Arkansas Legal Resource Navigator

26 U.S.C. § 7454 — Burden of proof in fraud, foundation man-

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

26 U.S.C. § 7454 — Burden of proof in fraud, foundation man-

Page 3919 TITLE 26—INTERNAL REVENUE CODE § 7454 or his delegate in the same manner before the Tax Court as he has heretofore been represented in proceedings before such Court. The taxpayer shall continue to be represented in accordance with the rules of practice prescribed by the Court. No qualified person shall be denied ad- mission to practice before the Tax Court be- cause of his failure to be a member of any pro- fession or calling. (Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 884; Pub. L. 86–368, § 2(a), Sept. 22, 1959, 73 Stat. 648; Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, § 1906(b)(13)(A), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1834.) Editorial Notes AMENDMENTS 1976—Pub. L. 94–455 struck out ‘‘or his delegate’’ after ‘‘Secretary’’. 1959—Pub. L. 86–368 substituted ‘‘Chief Counsel for the Internal Revenue Service or his delegate’’ for ‘‘As- sistant General Counsel of the Treasury Department serving as Chief Counsel of the Internal Revenue Serv- ice, or the delegate of such Chief Counsel,’’. Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1959 AMENDMENT Amendment by Pub. L. 86–368 effective when Chief Counsel for Internal Revenue Service first appointed pursuant to amendment of section 7801 of this title by Pub. L. 86–368 qualifies and takes office, see section 3 of Pub. L. 86–368, set out as a note under section 7801 of this title. § 7453. Rules of practice, procedure, and evi- dence Except in the case of proceedings conducted under section 7436(c) or 7463, the proceedings of the Tax Court and its divisions shall be con- ducted in accordance with such rules of practice and procedure (other than rules of evidence) as the Tax Court may prescribe and in accordance with the Federal Rules of Evidence. (Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 884; Pub. L. 91–172, title IX, §

Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 26 U.S.C. § 7454

Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.

Original supplied file — preserved unchanged

Download original Markdown file

File SHA-256: 92ad76919a9085f7e20253814e6ca37c7823dab6ba0de1a7449dd393357e83de. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.

Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.

Open the recorded source website ↗

Record provenance

Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:usc2024-a66997557304ec0dc41f12fa
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code-2024/title-26/section-7454-burden-of-proof-in-fraud-foundation-man--1382698785.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: 3ca1869484fb10425c4a8c2172fc9a6af4abc39fbd4e94e131fff62210b130b9

Source location: USCODE-2024-title26-subtitleF-chap76-subchapC-partII-sec7454.pdf

Stored source content

Page 3919 TITLE 26—INTERNAL REVENUE CODE § 7454 or his delegate in the same manner before the Tax Court as he has heretofore been represented in proceedings before such Court. The taxpayer shall continue to be represented in accordance with the rules of practice prescribed by the Court. No qualified person shall be denied ad- mission to practice before the Tax Court be- cause of his failure to be a member of any pro- fession or calling. (Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 884; Pub. L. 86–368, § 2(a), Sept. 22, 1959, 73 Stat. 648; Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, § 1906(b)(13)(A), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1834.) Editorial Notes AMENDMENTS 1976—Pub. L. 94–455 struck out ‘‘or his delegate’’ after ‘‘Secretary’’. 1959—Pub. L. 86–368 substituted ‘‘Chief Counsel for the Internal Revenue Service or his delegate’’ for ‘‘As- sistant General Counsel of the Treasury Department serving as Chief Counsel of the Internal Revenue Serv- ice, or the delegate of such Chief Counsel,’’. Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1959 AMENDMENT Amendment by Pub. L. 86–368 effective when Chief Counsel for Internal Revenue Service first appointed pursuant to amendment of section 7801 of this title by Pub. L. 86–368 qualifies and takes office, see section 3 of Pub. L. 86–368, set out as a note under section 7801 of this title. § 7453. Rules of practice, procedure, and evi- dence Except in the case of proceedings conducted under section 7436(c) or 7463, the proceedings of the Tax Court and its divisions shall be con- ducted in accordance with such rules of practice and procedure (other than rules of evidence) as the Tax Court may prescribe and in accordance with the Federal Rules of Evidence. (Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 884; Pub. L. 91–172, title IX, § 960(f), Dec. 30, 1969, 83 Stat. 734; Pub. L. 105–34, title XIV, § 1454(b)(3), Aug. 5, 1997, 111 Stat. 1057; Pub. L. 114–113, div. Q, title IV, § 425(a), Dec. 18, 2015, 129 Stat. 3125.) Editorial Notes REFERENCES IN TEXT The Federal Rules of Evidence, referred to in text, are set out in the Appendix to Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure. AMENDMENTS 2015—Pub. L. 114–113 substituted ‘‘the Federal Rules of Evidence’’ for ‘‘the rules of evidence applicable in trials without a jury in the United States District Court of the District of Columbia’’. 1997—Pub. L. 105–34 substituted ‘‘section 7436(c) or 7463’’ for ‘‘section 7463’’. 1969—Pub. L. 91–172 inserted reference to the excep- tion in the case of proceedings conducted under section 7463 of this title. Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries EFFECTIVE DATE OF 2015 AMENDMENT Pub. L. 114–113, div. Q, title IV, § 425(b), Dec. 18, 2015, 129 Stat. 3125, provided that: ‘‘The amendment made by this section [amending this section] shall apply to pro- ceedings commenced after the date of the enactment of this Act [Dec. 18, 2015] and, to the extent that it is just and practicable, to all proceedings pending on such date.’’ EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1969 AMENDMENT Amendment by Pub. L. 91–172 effective one year after Dec. 30, 1969, see section 962(e) of Pub. L. 91–172, set out as an Effective Date note under section 7463 of this title. TAX COURT RULE MAKING NOT AFFECTED Authority of Tax Court to prescribe rules under this section unaffected by amendments of title IV of Pub. L. 100–702, see section 405 of Pub. L. 100–702, set out as a note under section 2071 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judi- cial Procedure. § 7454. Burden of proof in fraud, foundation man- ager, and transferee cases (a) Fraud In any proceeding involving the issue whether the petitioner has been guilty of fraud with in- tent to evade tax, the burden of proof in respect of such issue shall be upon the Secretary. (b) Foundation managers In any proceeding involving the issue whether a foundation manager (as defined in section 4946(b)) has ‘‘knowingly’’ participated in an act of self-dealing (within the meaning of section 4941), participated in an investment which jeop- ardizes the carrying out of exempt purposes (within the meaning of section 4944), or agreed to the making of a taxable expenditure (within the meaning of section 4945), or whether the trustee of a trust described in section 501(c)(21) has ‘‘knowingly’’ participated in an act of self- dealing (within the meaning of section 4951) or agreed to the making of a taxable expenditure (within the meaning of section 4952), or whether an organization manager (as defined in section 4955(f)(2)) has ‘‘knowingly’’ agreed to the mak- ing of a political expenditure (within the mean- ing of section 4955), or whether an organization manager (as defined in section 4912(d)(2)) has ‘‘knowingly’’ agreed to the making of disquali- fying lobbying expenditures within the meaning of section 4912(b), or whether an organization manager (as defined in section 4958(f)(2)) has ‘‘knowingly’’ participated in an excess benefit transaction (as defined in section 4958(c)), the burden of proof in respect of such issue shall be upon the Secretary. (c) Cross reference For provisions relating to burden of proof as to transferee liability, see section 6902(a). (Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 884; Pub. L. 91–172, title I, § 101(j)(57), Dec. 30, 1969, 83 Stat. 532; Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, § 1906(b)(13)(A), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1834; Pub. L. 95–227, § 4(d)(7), Feb. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 23; Pub. L. 96–222, title I, § 108(b)(3)(B), Apr. 1, 1980, 94 Stat. 226; Pub. L. 100–203, title X, §§ 10712(c)(6), 10714(b), Dec. 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 1330–467, 1330–471; Pub. L. 104–168, title XIII, § 1311(c)(5), July 30, 1996, 110 Stat. 1478; Pub. L. 104–188, title I, § 1704(t)(43), Aug. 20, 1996, 110 Stat. 1889; Pub. L. 115–141, div. U, title IV, § 401(a)(329), Mar. 23, 2018, 132 Stat. 1200.) Page 3920 TITLE 26—INTERNAL REVENUE CODE § 7455 Editorial Notes AMENDMENTS 2018—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 115–141 substituted ‘‘4955),’’ for ‘‘4955),,’’. 1996—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 104–188 substituted ‘‘section 4955(f)(2)’’ for ‘‘section 4955(e)(2)’’. Pub. L. 104–168 inserted ‘‘or whether an organization manager (as defined in section 4958(f)(2)) has ‘know- ingly’ participated in an excess benefit transaction (as defined in section 4958(c)),’’ after ‘‘section 4912(b),’’. 1987—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 100–203, § 10714(b), sub- stituted ‘‘, or whether an organization manager (as de- fined in section 4912(d)(2)) has ‘knowingly’ agreed to the making of disqualifying lobbying expenditures within the meaning of section 4912(b), the burden of proof’’ for ‘‘the burden of proof’’. Pub. L. 100–203, § 10712(c)(6), substituted ‘‘or whether an organization manager (as defined in section 4955(e)(2)) has ‘knowingly’ agreed to the making of a political expenditure (within the meaning of section 4955), the burden of proof’’ for ‘‘the burden of proof’’. 1980—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 96–222 substituted ‘‘section 501(c)(21)’’ for ‘‘section 502(c)(21)’’. 1978—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 95–227 inserted provision re- lating to trustees of a trust described under section 502(c)(21) of this title. 1976—Subsecs. (a), (b). Pub. L. 94–455 struck out ‘‘or his delegate’’ after ‘‘Secretary’’. 1969—Pub. L. 91–172 inserted ‘‘, foundation manager’’ in section catchline. Subsecs (b), (c). Pub. L. 91–172 added subsec. (b) and redesignated former subsec. (b) as (c). Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1996 AMENDMENT Amendment by Pub. L. 104–168 applicable to excess benefit transactions occurring on or after Sept. 14, 1995, and not applicable to any benefit arising from a trans- action pursuant to any written contract which was binding on Sept. 13, 1995, and at all times thereafter be- fore such transaction occurred, see section 1311(d)(1), (2) of Pub. L. 104–168, set out as a note under section 4955 of this title. EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1987 AMENDMENT Amendment by section 10712(c)(6) of Pub. L. 100–203 applicable to taxable years beginning after Dec. 22, 1987, see section 10712(d) of Pub. L. 100–203, set out as an Effective Date note under section 4955 of this title. Amendment by section 10714(b) of Pub. L. 100–203 ap- plicable to taxable years beginning after Dec. 22, 1987, see section 10714(e) of Pub. L. 100–203, set out as an Ef- fective Date note under section 4912 of this title. EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1980 AMENDMENT Amendment by Pub. L. 96–222 effective as if included in the provisions of the Black Lung Benefits Revenue Act of 1977, Pub. L. 95–227, see section 108(b)(4) of Pub. L. 96–222, set out as a note under section 192 of this title. EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1978 AMENDMENT Amendment by Pub. L. 95–227 applicable with respect to contributions, acts, and expenditures made after Dec. 31, 1977, in and for taxable years beginning after such date, see section 4(f) of Pub. L. 95–227, set out as an Effective Date note under section 192 of this title. EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1969 AMENDMENT Amendment by Pub. L. 91–172 effective Jan. 1, 1970, see section 101(k)(1) of Pub. L. 91–172, set out as an Ef- fective Date note under section 4940 of this title. § 7455. Service of process The mailing by certified mail or registered mail of any pleading, decision, order, notice, or process in respect of proceedings before the Tax Court shall be held sufficient service of such pleading, decision, order, notice, or process. (Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 884; Pub. L. 85–866, title I, § 89(b), Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1665.) Editorial Notes AMENDMENTS 1958—Pub. L. 85–866 inserted ‘‘certified mail or’’ be- fore ‘‘registered mail’’. Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1958 AMENDMENT Amendment by Pub. L. 85–866 applicable only if mail- ing occurs after Sept. 2, 1958, see section 89(d) of Pub. L. 85–866, set out as a note under section 7502 of this title. § 7456. Administration of oaths and procurement of testimony (a) In general For the efficient administration of the func- tions vested in the Tax Court or any division thereof, any judge or special trial judge of the Tax Court, the clerk of the court or his deputies, as such, or any other employee of the Tax Court designated in writing for the purpose by the chief judge, may administer oaths, and any judge or special trial judge of the Tax Court may examine witnesses and require, by sub- poena ordered by the Tax Court or any division thereof and signed by the judge or special trial judge (or by the clerk of the Tax Court or by any other employee of the Tax Court when acting as deputy clerk)— (1) the attendance and testimony of wit- nesses, and the production of all necessary re- turns, books, papers, documents, correspond- ence, and other evidence, from any place in the United States at any designated place of hearing, or (2) the taking of a deposition before any des- ignated individual competent to administer oaths under this title. In the case of a deposi- tion the testimony shall be reduced to writing by the individual taking the deposition or under his direction and shall then be sub- scribed by the deponent. (b) Production of records in the case of foreign corporations, foreign trusts or estates and nonresident alien individuals The Tax Court or any division thereof, upon motion and notice by the Secretary, and upon good cause shown therefor, shall order any for- eign corporation, foreign trust or estate, or non- resident alien individual, who has filed a peti- tion with the Tax Court, to produce, or, upon satisfactory proof to the Tax Court or any of its divisions, that the petitioner is unable to produce, to make available to the Secretary, and, in either case, to permit the inspection, copying, or photographing of, such books, records, documents, memoranda, correspondence and other papers, wherever situated, as the Tax Court or any division thereof, may deem rel- evant to the proceedings and which are in the possession, custody or control of the petitioner, or of any person directly or indirectly under his

Cross-references

Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

26 U.S.C. § 7454 — Burden of proof in fraud, foundation man­ager, and transferee cases

**(a) Fraud** In any proceeding involving the issue whether the petitioner has been guilty of fraud with intent to evade tax, the burden of proof in respect of such issue shall be upon the Secretary. **(b) Foundation managers** In any proceeding involving the issue whether a foundation manager (as defined in section 4946(b)) has “knowingly” participated in an act of self-dealing (within the meaning of section 4941), participated in an investment which jeopardizes the carrying out of exempt purposes (within the meaning of section 4944), or agreed to the making of a taxable expenditure (within the meaning of section 4945), or whether the trustee of a trust described in section 501(c)(21) has “knowingly” participated in an act of self-dealing (within the meaning of section 4951) or agreed to the making of a taxable expenditure (within the meaning of section 4952), or whether an organization manager (as defined in section 4955(f)(2)) has “knowingly” agreed to the making of a political expenditure (within the meaning of section 4955), or whether an organization manager (as defined in section 4912(d)(2)) has “knowingly” agreed to the making of disqualifying lobbying expenditures within the meaning of section 4912(b), or whether an organization manager (as defined in section 4958(f)(2)) has “knowingly” participated in an excess benefit transaction (as defined in section 4958(c)), the burden of proof in respect of such issue shall be upon the Secretary. **(c) Cross reference** For provisions relating to burden of proof as to transferee liability, see section 6902(a).

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 26 U.S.C. § 7454

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.