Browse Arkansas Code titles and sections
28 U.S.C. § 1585 — Powers in law and equity
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 421
TITLE 28—JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE
§ 1602
1 So in original. Does not conform to section catchline.
TERMINATION OF SECTION
For termination of section by section 501(c) of
Pub. L. 100–449, see Effective and Termination
Dates note below.
Editorial Notes
REFERENCES IN TEXT
Section 777(f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, referred to in
text, is classified to section 1677f(f) of Title 19, Customs
Duties.
PRIOR PROVISIONS
A prior section 1584, added Pub. L. 96–417, title II,
§ 201, Oct. 10, 1980, 94 Stat. 1729, provided that if a civil
action within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Court of
International Trade was commenced in a district court
of the United States, the district court, in the interest
of justice, was to transfer such civil action to the Court
of International Trade, where such action would pro-
ceed as if it had been commenced in the Court of Inter-
national Trade in the first instance, and that if a civil
action within the exclusive jurisdiction of a district
court, a court of appeals, or the Court of Customs and
Patent Appeals was commenced in the Court of Inter-
national Trade, the Court of International Trade, in
the interest of justice, would transfer such civil action
to the appropriate district court or court of appeals or
to the Court of Customs and Patent Appeals where such
action was to proceed as if it had been commenced in
such court in the first instance, prior to repeal by Pub.
L. 97–164, title I, § 135, Apr. 2, 1982, 96 Stat. 41, effective
Oct. 1, 1982.
AMENDMENTS
2020—Pub. L. 116–113 substituted ‘‘Civil actions under
the United States-Canada Free-Trade Agreement or the
USMCA’’ for ‘‘Civil actions under the North American
Free Trade Agreement or the United States-Canada
Free-Trade Agreement’’ in section c
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 28 U.S.C. § 1585
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.
Original supplied file — preserved unchanged
Download original Markdown file
File SHA-256: c392c8165f439dcd6eef8921de299d646abf135e2548f84918ed239cb0849cc1. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.
Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.
Open the recorded source website ↗
Record provenance
Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:usc2024-a18fc7ac1f71f0da8d32e660
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code-2024/title-28/section-1585-powers-in-law-and-equity--fd31419f6a.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: c1636f38fb53e413efdabac63f607e70e5cabd31f96a408cd82ca0b5cfb5ce6c
Source location: USCODE-2024-title28-partIV-chap95-sec1585.pdf
Stored source content
Page 421
TITLE 28—JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE
§ 1602
1 So in original. Does not conform to section catchline.
TERMINATION OF SECTION
For termination of section by section 501(c) of
Pub. L. 100–449, see Effective and Termination
Dates note below.
Editorial Notes
REFERENCES IN TEXT
Section 777(f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, referred to in
text, is classified to section 1677f(f) of Title 19, Customs
Duties.
PRIOR PROVISIONS
A prior section 1584, added Pub. L. 96–417, title II,
§ 201, Oct. 10, 1980, 94 Stat. 1729, provided that if a civil
action within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Court of
International Trade was commenced in a district court
of the United States, the district court, in the interest
of justice, was to transfer such civil action to the Court
of International Trade, where such action would pro-
ceed as if it had been commenced in the Court of Inter-
national Trade in the first instance, and that if a civil
action within the exclusive jurisdiction of a district
court, a court of appeals, or the Court of Customs and
Patent Appeals was commenced in the Court of Inter-
national Trade, the Court of International Trade, in
the interest of justice, would transfer such civil action
to the appropriate district court or court of appeals or
to the Court of Customs and Patent Appeals where such
action was to proceed as if it had been commenced in
such court in the first instance, prior to repeal by Pub.
L. 97–164, title I, § 135, Apr. 2, 1982, 96 Stat. 41, effective
Oct. 1, 1982.
AMENDMENTS
2020—Pub. L. 116–113 substituted ‘‘Civil actions under
the United States-Canada Free-Trade Agreement or the
USMCA’’ for ‘‘Civil actions under the North American
Free Trade Agreement or the United States-Canada
Free-Trade Agreement’’ in section catchline.
1993—Pub. L. 103–182 amended section catchline gen-
erally, inserting ‘‘the North American Free Trade
Agreement or’’, and in text substituted ‘‘section 777(f)’’
for ‘‘section 777(d)’’.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 2020 AMENDMENT
Amendment by Pub. L. 116–113 effective on the date
on which the USMCA enters into force (July 1, 2020),
but not applicable to certain determinations under sec-
tion 1516a of Title 19, Customs Duties, or binational
panel reviews under NAFTA, see section 432 of Pub. L.
116–113, set out as a note under section 1516a of Title 19.
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1993 AMENDMENT
Amendment by Pub. L. 103–182 effective on the date
the North American Free Trade Agreement enters into
force with respect to the United States [Jan. 1, 1994],
but not applicable to any final determination described
in section 1516a(a)(1)(B) or (2)(B)(i), (ii), or (iii) of Title
19, Customs Duties, notice of which is published in the
Federal Register before such date, or to a determina-
tion described in section 1516a(a)(2)(B)(vi) of Title 19,
notice of which is received by the Government of Can-
ada or Mexico before such date, or to any binational
panel review under the United States-Canada Free-
Trade Agreement, or to any extraordinary challenge
arising out of any such review that was commenced be-
fore such date, see section 416 of Pub. L. 103–182, for-
merly set out as an Effective Date note under former
section 3431 of Title 19.
EFFECTIVE AND TERMINATION DATES
Section effective on date United States-Canada Free-
Trade Agreement enters into force (Jan. 1, 1989), and to
cease to have effect on date Agreement ceases to be in
force, see section 501(a), (c) of Pub. L. 100–449, set out
in a note under section 2112 of Title 19, Customs Duties.
EFFECT OF TERMINATION OF USMCA COUNTRY STATUS
For provisions relating to effect of termination of
USMCA country status on sections 401 to 432 of Pub. L.
116–113, see section 4601 of Title 19, Customs Duties.
§ 1585. Powers in law and equity
The Court of International Trade shall possess
all the powers in law and equity of, or as con-
ferred by statute upon, a district court of the
United States.
(Added Pub. L. 96–417, title II, § 201, Oct. 10, 1980,
94 Stat. 1730.)
CHAPTER 97—JURISDICTIONAL IMMUNITIES
OF FOREIGN STATES
Sec.
1602.
Findings and declaration of purpose.
1603.
Definitions.
1604.
Immunity of a foreign state from jurisdic-
tion.
1605.
General exceptions to the jurisdictional im-
munity of a foreign state.
1605A.
Terrorism exception to the jurisdictional im-
munity of a foreign state.
1605B.
Responsibility of foreign states for inter-
national
terrorism
against
the
United
States.
1606.
Extent of liability.
1607.
Counterclaims.
1608.
Service; time to answer default.1
1609.
Immunity from attachment and execution of
property of a foreign state.
1610.
Exceptions to the immunity from attachment
or execution.
1611.
Certain types of property immune from exe-
cution.
Editorial Notes
AMENDMENTS
2016—Pub. L. 114–222, § 3(b)(1), Sept. 28, 2016, 130 Stat.
853, added item 1605B.
2008—Pub. L. 110–181, div. A, title X, § 1083(a)(2), Jan.
28, 2008, 122 Stat. 341, added item 1605A.
§ 1602. Findings and declaration of purpose
The Congress finds that the determination by
United States courts of the claims of foreign
states to immunity from the jurisdiction of such
courts would serve the interests of justice and
would protect the rights of both foreign states
and litigants in United States courts. Under
international law, states are not immune from
the jurisdiction of foreign courts insofar as their
commercial activities are concerned, and their
commercial property may be levied upon for the
satisfaction of judgments rendered against them
in connection with their commercial activities.
Claims of foreign states to immunity should
henceforth be decided by courts of the United
States and of the States in conformity with the
principles set forth in this chapter.
(Added Pub. L. 94–583, § 4(a), Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat.
2892.)
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
EFFECTIVE DATE
Pub. L. 94–583, § 8, Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2898, provided
that: ‘‘This Act [enacting this chapter and section 1330
Cross-references
Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
The Court of International Trade shall possess all the powers in law and equity of, or as conferred by statute upon, a district court of the United States.
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 28 U.S.C. § 1585
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.