Browse Arkansas Code titles and sections
21 U.S.C. § 360e — Premarket approval
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 348
TITLE 21—FOOD AND DRUGS
§ 360e
out as notes under sections 379i and 379j–1 of this title]
shall take effect on October 1, 2022, or the date of the
enactment of this Act [Sept. 30, 2022], whichever is
later, except that fees under part 3 of subchapter C of
chapter VII of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
Act (21 U.S.C. 379i et seq.) shall be assessed for all sub-
missions listed in section 738(a)(2)(A) of such Act [21
U.S.C. 379j(a)(2)(A)] received on or after October 1, 2022,
regardless of the date of the enactment of this Act.’’
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 2017 AMENDMENT
Amendment by Pub. L. 115–52 effective Oct. 1, 2017,
with fees under subpart 3 of part C of subchapter VII of
this chapter to be assessed for all submissions listed in
section 379j(a)(2)(A) of this title received on or after
Oct. 1, 2017, see section 209 of Pub. L. 115–52, set out as
a note under section 379i of this title.
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1997 AMENDMENT
Amendment by Pub. L. 105–115 effective 90 days after
Nov. 21, 1997, except as otherwise provided, see section
501 of Pub. L. 105–115, set out as a note under section 321
of this title.
CONSTRUCTION OF 2016 AMENDMENT
Nothing in amendment by section 3044(b)(3) of Pub. L.
114–255 to be construed to restrict the prescribing of
antimicrobial drugs or other products, including drugs
approved under section 356(h) of this title, by health
care professionals, or to limit the practice of health
care, see section 3043 of Pub. L. 114–255, set out as a
note under section 356 of this title.
TERMINATION OF ADVISORY COMMITTEES
Advisory committees in existence on Jan. 5, 1973, to
terminate not later than the expiration of the 2-year
period following Jan. 5, 1973, and advisory committees
established after Jan. 5, 1973, to terminate not
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 21 U.S.C. § 360e
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.
Original supplied file — preserved unchanged
Download original Markdown file
File SHA-256: e8f724fbe1d3b6c53b0a93cf60775b2b6bf95a4f36b034412711d3aed56131a8. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.
Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.
Open the recorded source website ↗
Record provenance
Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:usc2024-948b803a6d2dd3de155077d9
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code-2024/title-21/section-360e-premarket-approval--29930b1368.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: 926f8c6aed759432dc03c1252ec45a73dfd0dcec30c7c93042ec3f52568d57b6
Source location: USCODE-2024-title21-chap9-subchapV-partA-sec360e.pdf
Stored source content
Page 348
TITLE 21—FOOD AND DRUGS
§ 360e
out as notes under sections 379i and 379j–1 of this title]
shall take effect on October 1, 2022, or the date of the
enactment of this Act [Sept. 30, 2022], whichever is
later, except that fees under part 3 of subchapter C of
chapter VII of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
Act (21 U.S.C. 379i et seq.) shall be assessed for all sub-
missions listed in section 738(a)(2)(A) of such Act [21
U.S.C. 379j(a)(2)(A)] received on or after October 1, 2022,
regardless of the date of the enactment of this Act.’’
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 2017 AMENDMENT
Amendment by Pub. L. 115–52 effective Oct. 1, 2017,
with fees under subpart 3 of part C of subchapter VII of
this chapter to be assessed for all submissions listed in
section 379j(a)(2)(A) of this title received on or after
Oct. 1, 2017, see section 209 of Pub. L. 115–52, set out as
a note under section 379i of this title.
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1997 AMENDMENT
Amendment by Pub. L. 105–115 effective 90 days after
Nov. 21, 1997, except as otherwise provided, see section
501 of Pub. L. 105–115, set out as a note under section 321
of this title.
CONSTRUCTION OF 2016 AMENDMENT
Nothing in amendment by section 3044(b)(3) of Pub. L.
114–255 to be construed to restrict the prescribing of
antimicrobial drugs or other products, including drugs
approved under section 356(h) of this title, by health
care professionals, or to limit the practice of health
care, see section 3043 of Pub. L. 114–255, set out as a
note under section 356 of this title.
TERMINATION OF ADVISORY COMMITTEES
Advisory committees in existence on Jan. 5, 1973, to
terminate not later than the expiration of the 2-year
period following Jan. 5, 1973, and advisory committees
established after Jan. 5, 1973, to terminate not later
than the expiration of the 2-year period beginning on
the date of their establishment, unless in the case of a
committee established by the President or an officer of
the Federal Government, such committee is renewed by
appropriate action prior to the expiration of such 2-
year period, or in the case of a committee established
by Congress, its duration is otherwise provided by law.
See section 1013 of Title 5, Government Organization
and Employees.
GUIDANCE
Pub. L. 114–255, div. A, title III, § 3053(b), Dec. 13, 2016,
130 Stat. 1125, provided that: ‘‘The Secretary of Health
and Human Services, acting through the Commissioner
of Food and Drugs, shall review and update, if nec-
essary, previously published guidance and standard op-
erating procedures identifying the principles for recog-
nizing standards, and for withdrawing the recognition
of standards, under section 514(c) of the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 360d(c)), taking into
account the experience with and reliance on a standard
by foreign regulatory authorities and the device indus-
try, and whether recognition of a standard will pro-
mote harmonization among regulatory authorities in
the regulation of devices.’’
REFERENCES IN OTHER LAWS TO GS–16, 17, OR 18 PAY
RATES
References in laws to the rates of pay for GS–16, 17,
or 18, or to maximum rates of pay under the General
Schedule, to be considered references to rates payable
under specified sections of Title 5, Government Organi-
zation and Employees, see section 529 [title I, § 101(c)(1)]
of Pub. L. 101–509, set out in a note under section 5376
of Title 5.
§ 360e. Premarket approval
(a) General requirement
A class III device—
(1) which is subject to an order issued under
subsection (b) (or a regulation promulgated
under such subsection prior to July 9, 2012); or
(2) which is a class III device because of sec-
tion 360c(f) of this title,
is required to have, unless exempt under section
360j(g) of this title, an approval under this sec-
tion of an application for premarket approval
or, as applicable, an approval under subsection
(c)(2) of a report seeking premarket approval.
(b) Order to require premarket approval
(1) In the case of a class III device which—
(A) was introduced or delivered for introduc-
tion into interstate commerce for commercial
distribution before May 28, 1976; or
(B) is (i) of a type so introduced or delivered,
and (ii) is substantially equivalent to another
device within that type,
the Secretary shall by administrative order fol-
lowing publication of a proposed order in the
Federal Register, a meeting of a device classi-
fication panel described in section 360c(b) of this
title, and consideration of comments from all af-
fected stakeholders, including patients, payors,
and providers, notwithstanding subchapter II of
chapter 5 of title 5, require that such device
have an approval under this section of an appli-
cation for premarket approval. Authority to
issue such administrative order shall not be del-
egated below the Director of the Center for De-
vices and Radiological Health, acting in con-
sultation with the Commissioner.
(2) A proposed order required under paragraph
(1) shall contain—
(A) the proposed order;
(B) proposed findings with respect to the de-
gree of risk of illness or injury designed to be
eliminated or reduced by requiring the device
to have an approved application for premarket
approval and the benefit to the public from
use of the device;
(C) opportunity for the submission of com-
ments on the proposed order and the proposed
findings; and
(D) opportunity to request a change in the
classification of the device based on new infor-
mation relevant to the classification of the de-
vice.
(3) After the expiration of the period for com-
ment on a proposed order and proposed findings
published under paragraph (2), consideration of
comments submitted on such proposed order and
findings, and a meeting of a device classification
panel described in section 360c(b) of this title,
the Secretary shall (A) issue an administrative
order under paragraph (1) and publish in the
Federal Register findings on the matters re-
ferred to in paragraph (2)(B), or (B) publish a no-
tice terminating the proceeding for the issuance
of the administrative order together with the
reasons for such termination. If a notice of ter-
mination is published, the Secretary shall (un-
less such notice is issued because the device is a
banned device under section 360f of this title)
initiate a proceeding under section 360c(e) of
this title to reclassify the device subject to the
proceeding terminated by such notice.
(c) Application for premarket approval
(1) Any person may file with the Secretary an
application for premarket approval for a class
Page 349
TITLE 21—FOOD AND DRUGS
§ 360e
III device. Such an application for a device shall
contain—
(A) full reports of all information, published
or known to or which should reasonably be
known to the applicant, concerning investiga-
tions which have been made to show whether
or not such device is safe and effective;
(B) a full statement of the components, in-
gredients, and properties and of the principle
or principles of operation, of such device;
(C) a full description of the methods used in,
and the facilities and controls used for, the
manufacture, processing, and, when relevant,
packing and installation of, such device;
(D) an identifying reference to any perform-
ance standard under section 360d of this title
which would be applicable to any aspect of
such device if it were a class II device, and ei-
ther adequate information to show that such
aspect of such device fully meets such per-
formance standard or adequate information to
justify any deviation from such standard;
(E) such samples of such device and of com-
ponents thereof as the Secretary may reason-
ably require, except that where the submission
of such samples is impracticable or unduly
burdensome, the requirement of this subpara-
graph may be met by the submission of com-
plete information concerning the location of
one or more such devices readily available for
examination and testing;
(F) specimens of the labeling proposed to be
used for such device;
(G) the certification required under section
282(j)(5)(B) of title 42 (which shall not be con-
sidered an element of such application); and
(H) such other information relevant to the
subject matter of the application as the Sec-
retary, with the concurrence of the appro-
priate panel under section 360c of this title,
may require.
(2)(A) Any person may file with the Secretary
a report seeking premarket approval for a class
III device referred to in subsection (a) that is a
reprocessed single-use device. Such a report
shall contain the following:
(i) The device name, including both the
trade or proprietary name and the common or
usual name.
(ii) The establishment registration number
of the owner or operator submitting the re-
port.
(iii) Actions taken to comply with perform-
ance standards under section 360d of this title.
(iv) Proposed labels, labeling, and adver-
tising sufficient to describe the device, its in-
tended use, and directions for use.
(v) Full reports of all information, published
or known to or which should be reasonably
known to the applicant, concerning investiga-
tions which have been made to show whether
or not the device is safe or effective.
(vi) A description of the device’s compo-
nents, ingredients, and properties.
(vii) A full description of the methods used
in, and the facilities and controls used for, the
reprocessing and packing of the device.
(viii) Such samples of the device that the
Secretary may reasonably require.
(ix) A financial certification or disclosure
statement or both, as required by part 54 of
title 21, Code of Federal Regulations.
(x) A statement that the applicant believes
to the best of the applicant’s knowledge that
all data and information submitted to the Sec-
retary are truthful and accurate and that no
material fact has been omitted in the report.
(xi) Any additional data and information, in-
cluding information of the type required in
paragraph (1) for an application under such
paragraph, that the Secretary determines is
necessary to determine whether there is rea-
sonable assurance of safety and effectiveness
for the reprocessed device.
(xii) Validation data described in section
360(o)(1)(A) of this title that demonstrates
that the reasonable assurance of the safety or
effectiveness of the device will remain after
the maximum number of times the device is
reprocessed as intended by the person submit-
ting such report.
(B) In the case of a class III device referred to
in subsection (a) that is a reprocessed single-use
device:
(i) Subparagraph (A) of this paragraph ap-
plies in lieu of paragraph (1).
(ii) Subject to clause (i), the provisions of
this section apply to a report under subpara-
graph (A) to the same extent and in the same
manner as such provisions apply to an applica-
tion under paragraph (1).
(iii) Each reference in other sections of this
chapter to an application under this section,
other than such a reference in section 379i or
379j of this title, shall be considered to be a
reference to a report under subparagraph (A).
(iv) Each reference in other sections of this
chapter to a device for which an application
under this section has been approved, or has
been denied, suspended, or withdrawn, other
than such a reference in section 379i or 379j of
this title, shall be considered to be a reference
to a device for which a report under subpara-
graph (A) has been approved, or has been de-
nied, suspended, or withdrawn, respectively.
(3) Upon receipt of an application meeting the
requirements set forth in paragraph (1), the Sec-
retary—
(A) may on the Secretary’s own initiative, or
(B) shall, upon the request of an applicant
unless the Secretary finds that the informa-
tion in the application which would be re-
viewed by a panel substantially duplicates in-
formation which has previously been reviewed
by a panel appointed under section 360c of this
title,
refer such application to the appropriate panel
under section 360c of this title for study and for
submission (within such period as he may estab-
lish) of a report and recommendation respecting
approval of the application, together with all
underlying data and the reasons or basis for the
recommendation. Where appropriate, the Sec-
retary shall ensure that such panel includes, or
consults with, one or more pediatric experts.
(4)(A) Prior to the submission of an applica-
tion under this subsection, the Secretary shall
accept and review any portion of the application
that the applicant and the Secretary agree is
complete, ready, and appropriate for review, ex-
cept that such requirement does not apply, and
the Secretary has discretion whether to accept
Page 350
TITLE 21—FOOD AND DRUGS
§ 360e
and review such portion, during any period in
which, under section 379j(g) of this title, the
Secretary does not have the authority to collect
fees under section 379j(a) of this title.
(B) Each portion of a submission reviewed
under subparagraph (A) and found acceptable by
the Secretary shall not be further reviewed after
receipt of an application that satisfies the re-
quirements of paragraph (1), unless a significant
issue of safety or effectiveness provides the Sec-
retary reason to review such accepted portion.
(C) Whenever the Secretary determines that a
portion of a submission under subparagraph (A)
is unacceptable, the Secretary shall, in writing,
provide to the applicant a description of any de-
ficiencies in such portion and identify the infor-
mation that is required to correct these defi-
ciencies, unless the applicant is no longer pur-
suing the application.
(5)(A) In requesting additional information
with respect to an application under this sec-
tion, the Secretary shall consider the least bur-
densome appropriate means necessary to dem-
onstrate a reasonable assurance of device safety
and effectiveness.
(B) For purposes of subparagraph (A), the term
‘‘necessary’’ means the minimum required infor-
mation that would support a determination by
the Secretary that an application provides a
reasonable assurance of the safety and effective-
ness of the device.
(C) For purposes of this paragraph, the Sec-
retary shall consider the role of postmarket in-
formation in determining the least burdensome
means of demonstrating a reasonable assurance
of device safety and effectiveness.
(D) Nothing in this paragraph alters the stand-
ards for premarket approval of a device.
(d) Action on application for premarket approval
(1)(A) As promptly as possible, but in no event
later than one hundred and eighty days after the
receipt of an application under subsection (c)
(except as provided in section 360j(l)(3)(D)(ii) of
this title or unless, in accordance with subpara-
graph (B)(i), an additional period as agreed upon
by the Secretary and the applicant), the Sec-
retary, after considering the report and rec-
ommendation submitted under paragraph (2) of
such subsection, shall—
(i) issue an order approving the application
if he finds that none of the grounds for deny-
ing approval specified in paragraph (2) of this
subsection applies; or
(ii) deny approval of the application if he
finds (and sets forth the basis for such finding
as part of or accompanying such denial) that
one or more grounds for denial specified in
paragraph (2) of this subsection apply.
In making the determination whether to ap-
prove or deny the application, the Secretary
shall rely on the conditions of use included in
the proposed labeling as the basis for deter-
mining whether or not there is a reasonable as-
surance of safety and effectiveness, if the pro-
posed labeling is neither false nor misleading. In
determining whether or not such labeling is
false or misleading, the Secretary shall fairly
evaluate all material facts pertinent to the pro-
posed labeling.
(B)(i) The Secretary may not enter into an
agreement to extend the period in which to take
action with respect to an application submitted
for a device subject to a regulation promulgated
under subsection (b) unless he finds that the
continued availability of the device is necessary
for the public health.
(ii) An order approving an application for a de-
vice may require as a condition to such approval
that the sale and distribution of the device be
restricted but only to the extent that the sale
and distribution of a device may be restricted
under a regulation under section 360j(e) of this
title.
(iii) The Secretary shall accept and review sta-
tistically valid and reliable data and any other
information
from
investigations
conducted
under the authority of regulations required by
section 360j(g) of this title to make a determina-
tion of whether there is a reasonable assurance
of safety and effectiveness of a device subject to
a pending application under this section if—
(I) the data or information is derived from
investigations of an earlier version of the de-
vice, the device has been modified during or
after the investigations (but prior to submis-
sion of an application under subsection (c))
and such a modification of the device does not
constitute a significant change in the design
or in the basic principles of operation of the
device that would invalidate the data or infor-
mation; or
(II) the data or information relates to a de-
vice approved under this section, is available
for use under this chapter, and is relevant to
the design and intended use of the device for
which the application is pending.
(2) The Secretary shall deny approval of an ap-
plication for a device if, upon the basis of the in-
formation submitted to the Secretary as part of
the application and any other information be-
fore him with respect to such device, the Sec-
retary finds that—
(A) there is a lack of a showing of reasonable
assurance that such device is safe under the
conditions of use prescribed, recommended, or
suggested in the proposed labeling thereof;
(B) there is a lack of a showing of reasonable
assurance that the device is effective under
the
conditions
of
use
prescribed,
rec-
ommended, or suggested in the proposed label-
ing thereof;
(C) the methods used in, or the facilities or
controls used for, the manufacture, proc-
essing, packing, or installation of such device
do not conform to the requirements of section
360j(f) of this title;
(D) based on a fair evaluation of all material
facts, the proposed labeling is false or mis-
leading in any particular; or
(E) such device is not shown to conform in
all respects to a performance standard in ef-
fect under section 360d of this title compliance
with which is a condition to approval of the
application and there is a lack of adequate in-
formation to justify the deviation from such
standard.
Any denial of an application shall, insofar as the
Secretary determines to be practicable, be ac-
companied by a statement informing the appli-
cant of the measures required to place such ap-
plication in approvable form (which measures
Page 351
TITLE 21—FOOD AND DRUGS
§ 360e
may include further research by the applicant in
accordance with one or more protocols pre-
scribed by the Secretary).
(3)(A)(i) The Secretary shall, upon the written
request of an applicant, meet with the appli-
cant, not later than 100 days after the receipt of
an application that has been filed as complete
under subsection (c), to discuss the review sta-
tus of the application.
(ii) The Secretary shall, in writing and prior
to the meeting, provide to the applicant a de-
scription of any deficiencies in the application
that, at that point, have been identified by the
Secretary based on an interim review of the en-
tire application and identify the information
that is required to correct those deficiencies.
(iii) The Secretary shall notify the applicant
promptly of—
(I) any additional deficiency identified in
the application, or
(II) any additional information required to
achieve completion of the review and final ac-
tion on the application,
that was not described as a deficiency in the
written description provided by the Secretary
under clause (ii).
(B) The Secretary and the applicant may, by
mutual consent, establish a different schedule
for a meeting required under this paragraph.
(4) An applicant whose application has been
denied approval may, by petition filed on or be-
fore the thirtieth day after the date upon which
he receives notice of such denial, obtain review
thereof in accordance with either paragraph (1)
or (2) of subsection (g), and any interested per-
son may obtain review, in accordance with para-
graph (1) or (2) of subsection (g), of an order of
the Secretary approving an application.
(5)(A)(i) Unless the change is consistent with a
predetermined change control plan approved
under section 360e–4 of this title, a supplemental
application shall be required for any change to
a device subject to an approved application
under this subsection that affects safety or ef-
fectiveness, unless such change is a modification
in a manufacturing procedure or method of man-
ufacturing and the holder of the approved appli-
cation submits a written notice to the Secretary
that describes in detail the change, summarizes
the data or information supporting the change,
and informs the Secretary that the change has
been made under the requirements of section
360j(f) of this title.
(ii) The holder of an approved application who
submits a notice under clause (i) with respect to
a manufacturing change of a device may dis-
tribute the device 30 days after the date on
which the Secretary receives the notice, unless
the Secretary within such 30-day period notifies
the holder that the notice is not adequate and
describes such further information or action
that is required for acceptance of such change. If
the Secretary notifies the holder that a supple-
mental application is required, the Secretary
shall review the supplement within 135 days
after the receipt of the supplement. The time
used by the Secretary to review the notice of
the manufacturing change shall be deducted
from the 135-day review period if the notice
meets appropriate content requirements for pre-
market approval supplements.
(B)(i) Subject to clause (ii), in reviewing a sup-
plement to an approved application, for an in-
cremental change to the design of a device that
affects safety or effectiveness, the Secretary
shall approve such supplement if—
(I) nonclinical data demonstrate that the de-
sign modification creates the intended addi-
tional capacity, function, or performance of
the device; and
(II) clinical data from the approved applica-
tion and any supplement to the approved ap-
plication provide a reasonable assurance of
safety and effectiveness for the changed de-
vice.
(ii) The Secretary may require, when nec-
essary, additional clinical data to evaluate the
design modification of the device to provide a
reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness.
(e) Withdrawal and temporary suspension of ap-
proval of application
(1) The Secretary shall, upon obtaining, where
appropriate, advice on scientific matters from a
panel or panels under section 360c of this title,
and after due notice and opportunity for infor-
mal hearing to the holder of an approved appli-
cation for a device, issue an order withdrawing
approval of the application if the Secretary
finds—
(A) that such device is unsafe or ineffective
under the conditions of use prescribed, rec-
ommended, or suggested in the labeling there-
of;
(B) on the basis of new information before
him with respect to such device, evaluated to-
gether with the evidence available to him
when the application was approved, that there
is a lack of a showing of reasonable assurance
that the device is safe or effective under the
conditions of use prescribed, recommended, or
suggested in the labeling thereof;
(C) that the application contained or was ac-
companied by an untrue statement of a mate-
rial fact;
(D) that the applicant (i) has failed to estab-
lish a system for maintaining records, or has
repeatedly or deliberately failed to maintain
records or to make reports, required by an ap-
plicable regulation under section 360i(a) of this
title, (ii) has refused to permit access to, or
copying or verification of, such records as re-
quired by section 374 of this title, or (iii) has
not complied with the requirements of section
360 of this title;
(E) on the basis of new information before
him with respect to such device, evaluated to-
gether with the evidence before him when the
application was approved, that the methods
used in, or the facilities and controls used for,
the manufacture, processing, packing, or in-
stallation of such device do not conform with
the requirements of section 360j(f) of this title
and were not brought into conformity with
such requirements within a reasonable time
after receipt of written notice from the Sec-
retary of nonconformity;
(F) on the basis of new information before
him, evaluated together with the evidence be-
fore him when the application was approved,
that the labeling of such device, based on a
fair evaluation of all material facts, is false or
Page 352
TITLE 21—FOOD AND DRUGS
§ 360e
misleading in any particular and was not cor-
rected within a reasonable time after receipt
of written notice from the Secretary of such
fact; or
(G) on the basis of new information before
him, evaluated together with the evidence be-
fore him when the application was approved,
that such device is not shown to conform in all
respects to a performance standard which is in
effect under section 360d of this title compli-
ance with which was a condition to approval of
the application and that there is a lack of ade-
quate information to justify the deviation
from such standard.
(2) The holder of an application subject to an
order issued under paragraph (1) withdrawing
approval of the application may, by petition
filed on or before the thirtieth day after the
date upon which he receives notice of such with-
drawal, obtain review thereof in accordance
with either paragraph (1) or (2) of subsection (g).
(3) If, after providing an opportunity for an in-
formal hearing, the Secretary determines there
is reasonable probability that the continuation
of distribution of a device under an approved ap-
plication would cause serious, adverse health
consequences or death, the Secretary shall by
order temporarily suspend the approval of the
application approved under this section. If the
Secretary issues such an order, the Secretary
shall proceed expeditiously under paragraph (1)
to withdraw such application.
(f) Product development protocol
(1) In the case of a class III device which is re-
quired to have an approval of an application
submitted under subsection (c), such device
shall be considered as having such an approval if
a notice of completion of testing conducted in
accordance with a product development protocol
approved under paragraph (4) has been declared
completed under paragraph (6).
(2) Any person may submit to the Secretary a
proposed product development protocol with re-
spect to a device. Such a protocol shall be ac-
companied by data supporting it. If, within thir-
ty days of the receipt of such a protocol, the
Secretary determines that it appears to be ap-
propriate to apply the requirements of this sub-
section to the device with respect to which the
protocol is submitted, the Secretary—
(A) may, at the initiative of the Secretary,
refer the proposed protocol to the appropriate
panel under section 360c of this title for its
recommendation respecting approval of the
protocol; or
(B) shall so refer such protocol upon the re-
quest of the submitter, unless the Secretary
finds that the proposed protocol and accom-
panying data which would be reviewed by such
panel substantially duplicate a product devel-
opment
protocol
and
accompanying
data
which have previously been reviewed by such a
panel.
(3) A proposed product development protocol
for a device may be approved only if—
(A) the Secretary determines that it is ap-
propriate to apply the requirements of this
subsection to the device in lieu of the require-
ment of approval of an application submitted
under subsection (c); and
(B) the Secretary determines that the pro-
posed protocol provides—
(i) a description of the device and the
changes which may be made in the device,
(ii) a description of the preclinical trials
(if any) of the device and a specification of
(I) the results from such trials to be required
before the commencement of clinical trials
of the device, and (II) any permissible vari-
ations in preclinical trials and the results
therefrom,
(iii) a description of the clinical trials (if
any) of the device and a specification of (I)
the results from such trials to be required
before the filing of a notice of completion of
the requirements of the protocol, and (II)
any permissible variations in such trials and
the results therefrom,
(iv) a description of the methods to be used
in, and the facilities and controls to be used
for, the manufacture, processing, and, when
relevant, packing and installation of the de-
vice,
(v) an identifying reference to any per-
formance standard under section 360d of this
title to be applicable to any aspect of such
device,
(vi) if appropriate, specimens of the label-
ing proposed to be used for such device,
(vii) such other information relevant to
the subject matter of the protocol as the
Secretary, with the concurrence of the ap-
propriate panel or panels under section 360c
of this title, may require, and
(viii) a requirement for submission of
progress
reports
and,
when
completed,
records of the trials conducted under the
protocol which records are adequate to show
compliance with the protocol.
(4) The Secretary shall approve or disapprove
a proposed product development protocol sub-
mitted under paragraph (2) within one hundred
and twenty days of its receipt unless an addi-
tional period is agreed upon by the Secretary
and the person who submitted the protocol. Ap-
proval of a protocol or denial of approval of a
protocol is final agency action subject to judi-
cial review under chapter 7 of title 5.
(5) At any time after a product development
protocol for a device has been approved pursuant
to paragraph (4), the person for whom the pro-
tocol was approved may submit a notice of com-
pletion—
(A) stating (i) his determination that the re-
quirements of the protocol have been fulfilled
and that, to the best of his knowledge, there is
no reason bearing on safety or effectiveness
why the notice of completion should not be-
come effective, and (ii) the data and other in-
formation upon which such determination was
made, and
(B) setting forth the results of the trials re-
quired by the protocol and all the information
required by subsection (c)(1).
(6)(A) The Secretary may, after providing the
person who has an approved protocol an oppor-
tunity for an informal hearing and at any time
prior to receipt of notice of completion of such
protocol, issue a final order to revoke such pro-
tocol if he finds that—
Page 353
TITLE 21—FOOD AND DRUGS
§ 360e
(i) such person has failed substantially to
comply with the requirements of the protocol,
(ii) the results of the trials obtained under
the protocol differ so substantially from the
results required by the protocol that further
trials cannot be justified, or
(iii) the results of the trials conducted under
the protocol or available new information do
not demonstrate that the device tested under
the protocol does not present an unreasonable
risk to health and safety.
(B) After the receipt of a notice of completion
of an approved protocol the Secretary shall,
within the ninety-day period beginning on the
date such notice is received, by order either de-
clare the protocol completed or declare it not
completed. An order declaring a protocol not
completed may take effect only after the Sec-
retary has provided the person who has the pro-
tocol opportunity for an informal hearing on the
order. Such an order may be issued only if the
Secretary finds—
(i) such person has failed substantially to
comply with the requirements of the protocol,
(ii) the results of the trials obtained under
the protocol differ substantially from the re-
sults required by the protocol, or
(iii) there is a lack of a showing of reason-
able assurance of the safety and effectiveness
of the device under the conditions of use pre-
scribed, recommended, or suggested in the pro-
posed labeling thereof.
(C) A final order issued under subparagraph
(A) or (B) shall be in writing and shall contain
the reasons to support the conclusions thereof.
(7) At any time after a notice of completion
has become effective, the Secretary may issue
an order (after due notice and opportunity for an
informal hearing to the person for whom the no-
tice is effective) revoking the approval of a de-
vice provided by a notice of completion which
has become effective as provided in subpara-
graph (B) if he finds that any of the grounds list-
ed in subparagraphs (A) through (G) of sub-
section (e)(1) of this section apply. Each ref-
erence in such subparagraphs to an application
shall be considered for purposes of this para-
graph as a reference to a protocol and the notice
of completion of such protocol, and each ref-
erence to the time when an application was ap-
proved shall be considered for purposes of this
paragraph as a reference to the time when a no-
tice of completion took effect.
(8) A person who has an approved protocol sub-
ject to an order issued under paragraph (6)(A) re-
voking such protocol, a person who has an ap-
proved protocol with respect to which an order
under paragraph (6)(B) was issued declaring that
the protocol had not been completed, or a person
subject to an order issued under paragraph (7)
revoking the approval of a device may, by peti-
tion filed on or before the thirtieth day after the
date upon which he receives notice of such
order, obtain review thereof in accordance with
either paragraph (1) or (2) of subsection (g).
(g) Review
(1) Upon petition for review of—
(A) an order under subsection (d) approving
or denying approval of an application or an
order under subsection (e) withdrawing ap-
proval of an application, or
(B) an order under subsection (f)(6)(A) revok-
ing an approved protocol, under subsection
(f)(6)(B) declaring that an approved protocol
has not been completed, or under subsection
(f)(7) revoking the approval of a device,
the Secretary shall, unless he finds the petition
to be without good cause or unless a petition for
review of such order has been submitted under
paragraph (2), hold a hearing, in accordance
with section 554 of title 5, on the order. The
panel or panels which considered the applica-
tion, protocol, or device subject to such order
shall designate a member to appear and testify
at any such hearing upon request of the Sec-
retary, the petitioner, or the officer conducting
the hearing, but this requirement does not pre-
clude any other member of the panel or panels
from appearing and testifying at any such hear-
ing. Upon completion of such hearing and after
considering the record established in such hear-
ing, the Secretary shall issue an order either af-
firming the order subject to the hearing or re-
versing such order and, as appropriate, approv-
ing or denying approval of the application, rein-
stating the application’s approval, approving
the protocol, or placing in effect a notice of
completion.
(2)(A) Upon petition for review of—
(i) an order under subsection (d) approving
or denying approval of an application or an
order under subsection (e) withdrawing ap-
proval of an application, or
(ii) an order under subsection (f)(6)(A) revok-
ing an approved protocol, under subsection
(f)(6)(B) declaring that an approved protocol
has not been completed, or under subsection
(f)(7) revoking the approval of a device,
the Secretary shall refer the application or pro-
tocol subject to the order and the basis for the
order to an advisory committee of experts estab-
lished pursuant to subparagraph (B) for a report
and recommendation with respect to the order.
The advisory committee shall, after independent
study of the data and information furnished to
it by the Secretary and other data and informa-
tion before it, submit to the Secretary a report
and recommendation, together with all under-
lying data and information and a statement of
the reasons or basis for the recommendation. A
copy of such report shall be promptly supplied
by the Secretary to any person who petitioned
for such referral to the advisory committee.
(B) The Secretary shall establish advisory
committees (which may not be panels under sec-
tion 360c of this title) to receive referrals under
subparagraph (A). The Secretary shall appoint
as members of any such advisory committee per-
sons qualified in the subject matter to be re-
ferred to the committee and of appropriately di-
versified professional backgrounds, except that
the Secretary may not appoint to such a com-
mittee any individual who is in the regular full-
time employ of the United States and engaged
in the administration of this chapter. Members
of an advisory committee (other than officers or
employees of the United States), while attend-
ing conferences or meetings of their committee
or otherwise serving at the request of the Sec-
Page 354
TITLE 21—FOOD AND DRUGS
§ 360e
retary, shall be entitled to receive compensation
at rates to be fixed by the Secretary, which
rates may not exceed the daily equivalent for
grade GS–18 of the General Schedule for each
day (including traveltime) they are so engaged;
and while so serving away from their homes or
regular places of business each member may be
allowed travel expenses, including per diem in
lieu of subsistence, as authorized by section 5703
of title 5 for persons in the Government service
employed intermittently. The Secretary shall
designate the chairman of an advisory com-
mittee from its members. The Secretary shall
furnish each advisory committee with clerical
and other assistance, and shall by regulation
prescribe the procedures to be followed by each
such committee in acting on referrals made
under subparagraph (A).
(C) The Secretary shall make public the report
and recommendation made by an advisory com-
mittee with respect to an application and shall
by order, stating the reasons therefor, either af-
firm the order referred to the advisory com-
mittee or reverse such order and, if appropriate,
approve or deny approval of the application, re-
instate the application’s approval, approve the
protocol, or place in effect a notice of comple-
tion.
(h) Service of orders
Orders of the Secretary under this section
shall be served (1) in person by any officer or
employee of the department designated by the
Secretary, or (2) by mailing the order by reg-
istered mail or certified mail addressed to the
applicant at his last known address in the
records of the Secretary.
(i) Revision
(1) Before December 1, 1995, the Secretary
shall by order require manufacturers of devices,
which were introduced or delivered for introduc-
tion into interstate commerce for commercial
distribution before May 28, 1976, and which are
subject to revision of classification under para-
graph (2), to submit to the Secretary a summary
of and citation to any information known or
otherwise available to the manufacturer re-
specting such devices, including adverse safety
or effectiveness information which has not been
submitted under section 360i of this title. The
Secretary may require the manufacturer to sub-
mit the adverse safety or effectiveness data for
which a summary and citation were submitted,
if such data are available to the manufacturer.
(2) After the issuance of an order under para-
graph (1) but before the date that is 2 years after
July 9, 2012, the Secretary shall issue an admin-
istrative order following publication of a pro-
posed order in the Federal Register, a meeting
of a device classification panel described in sec-
tion 360c(b) of this title, and consideration of
comments from all affected stakeholders, in-
cluding patients, payors, and providers, notwith-
standing subchapter II of chapter 5 of title 5, for
each device—
(A) which the Secretary has classified as a
class III device, and
(B) for which no administrative order has
been issued under subsection (b) (or no regula-
tion has been promulgated under such sub-
section prior to July 9, 2012),
revising the classification of the device so that
the device is classified into class I or class II,
unless the administrative order issued under
this paragraph requires the device to remain in
class III. In determining whether to revise the
classification of a device or to require a device
to remain in class III, the Secretary shall apply
the criteria set forth in section 360c(a) of this
title.
(3) The Secretary shall, as promptly as is rea-
sonably achievable, but not later than 12 months
after the effective date of the order requiring a
device to remain in class III, establish a sched-
ule for the issuance of an administrative order
under subsection (b) for each device which is
subject to the order requiring the device to re-
main in class III.
(June 25, 1938, ch. 675, § 515, as added Pub. L.
94–295, § 2, May 28, 1976, 90 Stat. 552; amended
Pub. L. 101–629, §§ 4(b)(1), 9(a), 18(c), Nov. 28, 1990,
104 Stat. 4515, 4521, 4528; Pub. L. 103–80, § 3(t),
Aug. 13, 1993, 107 Stat. 778; Pub. L. 105–115, title
II, §§ 201(b), 202, 205(c), 209(b), 216(b), Nov. 21, 1997,
111 Stat. 2334, 2338, 2341, 2349; Pub. L. 107–250,
title II, §§ 209, 210, title III, § 302(c), Oct. 26, 2002,
116 Stat. 1613, 1614, 1618; Pub. L. 108–214, § 2(d)(1),
Apr. 1, 2004, 118 Stat. 576; Pub. L. 110–85, title
VIII, § 801(b)(3)(D), Sept. 27, 2007, 121 Stat. 921;
Pub. L. 112–144, title II, § 203(g), title VI,
§ 608(b)(1), July 9, 2012, 126 Stat. 1006, 1056; Pub.
L. 114–255, div. A, title III, §§ 3051(c)(1), 3058(b),
3101(a)(2)(J), Dec. 13, 2016, 130 Stat. 1124, 1129,
1154; Pub. L. 115–52, title II, § 203(f)(2)(A), Aug. 18,
2017, 131 Stat. 1015; Pub. L. 117–328, div. FF, title
III, § 3308(b)(2), Dec. 29, 2022, 136 Stat. 5836.)
Editorial Notes
AMENDMENTS
2022—Subsec. (d)(5)(A)(i). Pub. L. 117–328 substituted
‘‘Unless the change is consistent with a predetermined
change control plan approved under section 360e–4 of
this title, a supplemental’’ for ‘‘A supplemental’’.
2017—Subsec. (c)(4)(A). Pub. L. 115–52 substituted
‘‘section 379j(g)’’ for ‘‘section 379j(h)’’.
2016—Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 114–255, § 3101(a)(2)(J),
substituted ‘‘subject to an order’’ for ‘‘subject to a an
order’’.
Subsec. (c)(5). Pub. L. 114–255, § 3058(b), added par. (5).
Subsec. (d)(5), (6). Pub. L. 114–255, § 3051(c)(1), redesig-
nated par. (6) as (5) and struck out former par. (5) which
read as follows: ‘‘In order to provide for more effective
treatment or diagnosis of life-threatening or irrevers-
ibly debilitating human diseases or conditions, the Sec-
retary shall provide review priority for devices—
‘‘(A) representing breakthrough technologies,
‘‘(B) for which no approved alternatives exist,
‘‘(C) which offer significant advantages over exist-
ing approved alternatives, or
‘‘(D) the availability of which is in the best interest
of the patients.’’
2012—Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 112–144, § 608(b)(1)(A), sub-
stituted ‘‘an order issued under subsection (b) (or a reg-
ulation promulgated under such subsection prior to
July 9, 2012)’’ for ‘‘regulation promulgated under sub-
section (b)’’.
Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 112–144, § 608(b)(1)(B)(i)(I), which
directed substitution of ‘‘Order’’ for ‘‘Regulation’’ in
the heading of par. (1) of subsec. (b), was executed by
making the substitution in the heading of subsec. (b),
to reflect the probable intent of Congress.
Subsec. (b)(1). Pub. L. 112–144, § 608(b)(1)(B)(i)(II), in
concluding provisions, substituted ‘‘by administrative
order following publication of a proposed order in the
Page 355
TITLE 21—FOOD AND DRUGS
§ 360e
Federal Register, a meeting of a device classification
panel described in section 360c(b) of this title, and con-
sideration of comments from all affected stakeholders,
including patients, payors, and providers, notwith-
standing subchapter II of chapter 5 of title 5’’ for ‘‘by
regulation, promulgated in accordance with this sub-
section’’ and inserted at end ‘‘Authority to issue such
administrative order shall not be delegated below the
Director of the Center for Devices and Radiological
Health, acting in consultation with the Commis-
sioner.’’
Subsec. (b)(2). Pub. L. 112–144, § 608(b)(1)(B)(ii), struck
out subpar. (A) designation after ‘‘(2)’’ and substituted
‘‘A proposed order required under paragraph (1) shall
contain—’’ for ‘‘A proceeding for the promulgation of a
regulation under paragraph (1) respecting a device shall
be initiated by the publication in the Federal Register
of a notice of proposed rulemaking. Such notice shall
contain—’’ in introductory provisions, redesignated cls.
(i) to (iv) as subpars. (A) to (D), respectively, sub-
stituted ‘‘order’’ for ‘‘regulation’’ in subpars. (A) and
(C), and struck out former subpar. (B) which read as
follows: ‘‘If, within fifteen days after publication of a
notice under subparagraph (A), the Secretary receives a
request for a change in the classification of a device, he
shall, within sixty days of the publication of such no-
tice and after consultation with the appropriate panel
under section 360c of this title, by order published in
the Federal Register, either deny the request for
change in classification or give notice of his intent to
initiate such a change under section 360c(e) of this
title.’’
Subsec. (b)(3). Pub. L. 112–144, § 608(b)(1)(B)(iii)(I), (II),
(IV), (V), substituted ‘‘proposed order’’ for ‘‘proposed
regulation’’ in two places, ‘‘paragraph (2),’’ for ‘‘para-
graph (2) and after’’, ‘‘(A) issue an administrative order
under paragraph (1)’’ for ‘‘(A) promulgate such regula-
tion’’, ‘‘paragraph (2)(B)’’ for ‘‘paragraph (2)(A)(ii)’’,
and ‘‘issuance of the administrative order’’ for ‘‘pro-
mulgation of the regulation’’.
Pub. L. 112–144, § 608(b)(1)(B)(iii)(III), which directed
insertion of ‘‘and a meeting of a device classification
panel described in section 360c(b) of this title,’’ after
‘‘such proposed regulation and findings,’’ was inserted
after ‘‘such proposed order and findings,’’ to reflect the
probable intent of Congress and amendment by Pub. L.
112–144, § 608(b)(1)(B)(iii)(I). See above.
Subsec. (b)(4). Pub. L. 112–144, § 608(b)(1)(B)(iv), struck
out par. (4) which read as follows: ‘‘The Secretary, upon
his own initiative or upon petition of an interested per-
son, may by regulation amend or revoke any regulation
promulgated under this subsection. A regulation to
amend or revoke a regulation under this subsection
shall be promulgated in accordance with the require-
ments prescribed by this subsection for the promulga-
tion of the regulation to be amended or revoked.’’
Subsec. (c)(4)(A). Pub. L. 112–144, § 203(g), substituted
‘‘379j(h)’’ for ‘‘379j(g)’’.
Subsec. (i)(2). Pub. L. 112–144, § 608(b)(1)(C)(i)(III), (IV),
in concluding provisions, substituted ‘‘administrative
order issued under this paragraph requires’’ for ‘‘regu-
lation requires’’ and struck out at end ‘‘Before the pub-
lication of a regulation requiring a device to remain in
class III or revising its classification, the Secretary
shall publish a proposed regulation respecting the clas-
sification of a device under this paragraph and provide
reasonable opportunity for the submission of comments
on any such regulation. No regulation requiring a de-
vice to remain in class III or revising its classification
may take effect before the expiration of 90 days from
the date of its publication in the Federal Register as a
proposed regulation.’’
Pub. L. 112–144, § 608(b)(1)(C)(i)(I), in introductory pro-
visions, substituted ‘‘the date that is 2 years after July
9, 2012’’ for ‘‘December 1, 1995’’ and ‘‘issue an adminis-
trative order following publication of a proposed order
in the Federal Register, a meeting of a device classi-
fication panel described in section 360c(b) of this title,
and consideration of comments from all affected stake-
holders, including patients, payors, and providers, not-
withstanding subchapter II of chapter 5 of title 5,’’ for
‘‘publish a regulation in the Federal Register’’.
Subsec. (i)(2)(B). Pub. L. 112–144, § 608(b)(1)(C)(i)(II),
substituted ‘‘administrative order has been issued
under subsection (b) (or no regulation has been promul-
gated under such subsection prior to July 9, 2012)’’ for
‘‘final regulation has been promulgated under sub-
section (b) of this section’’.
Subsec. (i)(3). Pub. L. 112–144, § 608(b)(1)(C)(ii), sub-
stituted ‘‘order requiring’’ for ‘‘regulation requiring’’
in two places and ‘‘issuance of an administrative order
under subsection (b)’’ for ‘‘promulgation of a subsection
(b) of this section regulation’’.
2007—Subsec. (c)(1)(G), (H). Pub. L. 110–85 added sub-
par. (G) and redesignated former subpar. (G) as (H).
2004—Subsec. (c)(3). Pub. L. 108–214, § 2(d)(1)(B),
amended directory language of Pub. L. 107–250, § 210.
See 2002 Amendment note below.
Pub. L. 108–214, § 2(d)(1)(A)(i), redesignated par. (3) re-
lating to acceptance and review of any portion of the
application prior to submission as (4).
Subsec. (c)(4). Pub. L. 108–214, § 2(d)(1)(A), redesig-
nated par. (3) relating to acceptance and review of any
portion of the application prior to submission as (4) and
substituted ‘‘unless a significant issue of safety’’ for
‘‘unless an issue of safety’’ in subpar. (B).
2002—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 107–250, § 302(c)(1), inserted
‘‘or, as applicable, an approval under subsection (c)(2)
of a report seeking premarket approval’’ before period
in concluding provisions.
Subsec. (c)(2). Pub. L. 107–250, § 302(c)(2)(B), added par.
(2). Former par. (2) redesignated (3).
Subsec. (c)(3). Pub. L. 107–250, § 302(c)(2)(A), redesig-
nated par. (2) relating to Secretary’s referral of appli-
cation to appropriate panel as (3).
Pub. L. 107–250, § 210, as amended by Pub. L. 108–214,
§ 2(d)(1)(B), inserted ‘‘Where appropriate, the Secretary
shall ensure that such panel includes, or consults with,
one or more pediatric experts.’’ at the end of the con-
cluding provisions of par. (3) as redesignated by Pub. L.
107–250, § 302(c)(2)(A).
Pub. L. 107–250, § 209, added par. (3) relating to accept-
ance and review of any portion of the application prior
to submission.
1997—Subsec. (d)(1)(A). Pub. L. 105–115, § 205(c)(1), in-
serted at end ‘‘In making the determination whether to
approve or deny the application, the Secretary shall
rely on the conditions of use included in the proposed
labeling as the basis for determining whether or not
there is a reasonable assurance of safety and effective-
ness, if the proposed labeling is neither false nor mis-
leading. In determining whether or not such labeling is
false or misleading, the Secretary shall fairly evaluate
all material facts pertinent to the proposed labeling.’’
Subsec. (d)(1)(B)(iii). Pub. L. 105–115, § 201(b), added cl.
(iii).
Subsec. (d)(3), (4). Pub. L. 105–115, § 202(1), 209(b),
added par. (3) and redesignated former par. (3) as (4).
Subsec. (d)(5). Pub. L. 105–115, § 202(2), added par. (5).
Subsec. (d)(6). Pub. L. 105–115, § 205(c)(2), added par.
(6).
Subsec. (f)(2). Pub. L. 105–115, § 216(b), substituted
‘‘the Secretary—’’ and subpars. (A) and (B) for ‘‘he shall
refer the proposed protocol to the appropriate panel
under section 360c of this title for its recommendation
respecting approval of the protocol.’’
1993—Subsec. (c)(2)(A). Pub. L. 103–80 struck out
‘‘refer such application’’ after ‘‘own initiative’’.
1990—Subsec. (c)(2). Pub. L. 101–629, § 18(c), sub-
stituted ‘‘the Secretary—’’ for ‘‘the Secretary shall’’
and added subpars. (A) and (B).
Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 101–629, § 9(a)(2), inserted ‘‘and
temporary suspension’’ after ‘‘Withdrawal’’ in heading.
Subsec. (e)(3). Pub. L. 101–629, § 9(a)(1), added par. (3).
Subsec. (i). Pub. L. 101–629, § 4(b)(1), added subsec. (i).
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 2017 AMENDMENT
Amendment by Pub. L. 115–52 effective Oct. 1, 2017,
with fees under subpart 3 of part C of subchapter VII of
Page 356
TITLE 21—FOOD AND DRUGS
§ 360e–1
this chapter to be assessed for all submissions listed in
section 379j(a)(2)(A) of this title received on or after
Oct. 1, 2017, see section 209 of Pub. L. 115–52, set out as
a note under section 379i of this title.
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 2012 AMENDMENT
Amendment by section 203(g) of Pub. L. 112–144 effec-
tive Oct. 1, 2012, with additional provision for assess-
ment of certain fees, see section 206 of Pub. L. 112–144,
set out as a note under section 379i of this title.
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1997 AMENDMENT
Amendment by Pub. L. 105–115 effective 90 days after
Nov. 21, 1997, except as otherwise provided, see section
501 of Pub. L. 105–115, set out as a note under section 321
of this title.
TERMINATION OF ADVISORY COMMITTEES
Advisory committees in existence on Jan. 5, 1973, to
terminate not later than the expiration of the 2-year
period following Jan. 5, 1973, and advisory committees
established after Jan. 5, 1973, to terminate not later
than the expiration of the 2-year period beginning on
the date of their establishment, unless in the case of a
committee established by the President or an officer of
the Federal Government, such committee is renewed by
appropriate action prior to the expiration of such 2-
year period, or in the case of a committee established
by Congress, its duration is otherwise provided by law.
See section 1013 of Title 5, Government Organization
and Employees.
REPORT ON CERTAIN DEVICES
Pub. L. 107–250, title II, § 205, Oct. 26, 2002, 116 Stat.
1612, directed the Secretary of Health and Human Serv-
ices, not later than one year after Oct. 26, 2002, to re-
port to the appropriate committees of Congress on the
timeliness and effectiveness of device premarket re-
views by centers other than the Center for Devices and
Radiological Health, including information on the
times required to log in and review original submis-
sions and supplements, times required to review manu-
facturers’ replies to submissions, times to approve or
clear such devices, and recommendations on improve-
ment of performance and reassignment of responsi-
bility for regulating such devices.
REFERENCES IN OTHER LAWS TO GS–16, 17, OR 18 PAY
RATES
References in laws to the rates of pay for GS–16, 17,
or 18, or to maximum rates of pay under the General
Schedule, to be considered references to rates payable
under specified sections of Title 5, Government Organi-
zation and Employees, see section 529 [title I, § 101(c)(1)]
of Pub. L. 101–509, set out in a note under section 5376
of Title 5.
§ 360e–1. Pediatric uses of devices
(a) New devices
(1) In general
A person that submits to the Secretary an
application under section 360j(m) of this title,
or an application (or supplement to an appli-
cation) or a product development protocol
under section 360e of this title, shall include in
the application or protocol the information
described in paragraph (2).
(2) Required information
The application or protocol described in
paragraph (1) shall include, with respect to the
device for which approval is sought and if
readily available—
(A) a description of any pediatric sub-
populations that suffer from the disease or
condition that the device is intended to
treat, diagnose, or cure; and
(B) the number of affected pediatric pa-
tients.
(3) Annual report
Not later than 18 months after September 27,
2007, and annually thereafter, the Secretary
shall submit to the Committee on Health,
Education, Labor, and Pensions of the Senate
and the Committee on Energy and Commerce
of the House of Representatives a report that
includes—
(A) the number of devices approved in the
year preceding the year in which the report
is submitted, for which there is a pediatric
subpopulation that suffers from the disease
or condition that the device is intended to
treat, diagnose, or cure;
(B) any information, based on a review of
data available to the Secretary, regarding
devices used in pediatric patients but not la-
beled for such use for which the Secretary
determines that approved pediatric labeling
could confer a benefit to pediatric patients;
(C) the number of pediatric devices that
receive a humanitarian use exemption under
section 360j(m) of this title;
(D) the number of devices approved in the
year preceding the year in which the report
is submitted, labeled for use in pediatric pa-
tients;
(E) the number of pediatric devices ap-
proved in the year preceding the year in
which the report is submitted, exempted
from a fee pursuant to section 379j(a)(2)(B)(v)
of this title;
(F) the review time for each device de-
scribed in subparagraphs (A), (C), (D), and
(E);
(G) the number of devices for which the
Secretary relied on data with respect to
adults to support a determination of a rea-
sonable assurance of safety and effectiveness
in pediatric patients; and
(H) the number of devices for which the
Secretary relied on data from one pediatric
subpopulation to support a determination of
a reasonable assurance of safety and effec-
tiveness in another pediatric subpopulation.
For the items described in this paragraph, such
report shall disaggregate the number of devices
by pediatric subpopulation.
(b) Determination of pediatric effectiveness
based on similar course of disease or condi-
tion or similar effect of device on adults
(1) In general
If the course of the disease or condition and
the effects of the device are sufficiently simi-
lar in adults and pediatric patients, the Sec-
retary may conclude that adult data may be
used to support a determination of a reason-
able assurance of effectiveness in pediatric
populations, as appropriate.
(2) Extrapolation between subpopulations
A study may not be needed in each pediatric
subpopulation if data from one subpopulation
can be extrapolated to another subpopulation.
Cross-references
Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a) Reasonable assurance of safe and effective performance; periodic evaluation**
(1) The special controls required by [section 360c(a)(1)(B) of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title21-section360c/a/1/B&num=0&edition=prelim) shall include performance standards for a class II device if the Secretary determines that a performance standard is necessary to provide reasonable assurance of the safety and effectiveness of the device. A class III device may also be considered a class II device for purposes of establishing a standard for the device under subsection (b) if the device has been reclassified as a class II device under an administrative order under [section 360c(e) of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title21-section360c/e&num=0&edition=prelim) (or a regulation promulgated under such section prior to July 9, 2012) but such order (or regulation) provides that the reclassification is not to take effect until the effective date of such a standard for the device.
(2) A performance standard established under subsection (b) for a device—
(A) shall include provisions to provide reasonable assurance of its safe and effective performance;
(B) shall, where necessary to provide reasonable assurance of its safe and effective performance, include—
(i) provisions respecting the construction, components, ingredients, and properties of the device and its compatibility with power systems and connections to such systems,
(ii) provisions for the testing (on a sample basis or, if necessary, on an individual basis) of the device or, if it is determined that no other more practicable means are available to the Secretary to assure the conformity of the device to the standard, provisions for
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 21 U.S.C. § 360d
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. The source passage cites 21 U.S.C. § 360d. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 344
TITLE 21—FOOD AND DRUGS
§ 360d
Editorial Notes
CODIFICATION
Section was enacted as part of the Food and Drug Ad-
ministration Safety and Innovation Act, and not as
part of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
which comprises this chapter.
§ 360d. Performance standards
(a) Reasonable assurance of safe and effective
performance; periodic evaluation
(1) The special controls required by section
360c(a)(1)(B) of this title shall include perform-
ance standards for a class II device if the Sec-
retary determines that a performance standard
is necessary to provide reasonable assurance of
the safety and effectiveness of the device. A
class III device may also be considered a class II
device for purposes of establishing a standard
for the device under subsection (b) if the device
has been reclassified as a class II device under
an administrative order under section 360c(e) of
this title (or a regulation promulgated under
such section prior to July 9, 2012) but such order
(or regulation) provides that the reclassification
is not to take effect until the effective date of
such a standard for the device.
(2) A performance standard established under
subsection (b) for a device—
(A) shall include provisions to provide rea-
sonable assurance of its safe and effective per-
formance;
(B) shall, where necessary to provide reason-
able assurance of its safe and effective per-
formance, include—
(i) provisions respecting the construction,
components, ingredients, and properties of
the device and its compatibility with power
systems and connections to such systems,
(ii) provisions for the testing (on a sample
basis or, if necessary, on an individual basis)
of the device or, if it is determined that no
other more practicable means are available
t
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 21 U.S.C. § 360d
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. The source passage cites 21 U.S.C. § 360d. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a) General requirement** A class III device—
(1) which is subject to an order issued under subsection (b) (or a regulation promulgated under such subsection prior to July 9, 2012); or
(2) which is a class III device because of [section 360c(f) of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title21-section360c/f&num=0&edition=prelim),
is required to have, unless exempt under [section 360j(g) of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title21-section360j/g&num=0&edition=prelim), an approval under this section of an application for premarket approval or, as applicable, an approval under subsection (c)(2) of a report seeking premarket approval.
**(b) Order to require premarket approval**
(1) In the case of a class III device which—
(A) was introduced or delivered for introduction into interstate commerce for commercial distribution before May 28, 1976; or
(B) is (i) of a type so introduced or delivered, and (ii) is substantially equivalent to another device within that type,
the Secretary shall by administrative order following publication of a proposed order in the Federal Register, a meeting of a device classification panel described in [section 360c(b) of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title21-section360c/b&num=0&edition=prelim), and consideration of comments from all affected stakeholders, including patients, payors, and providers, notwithstanding subchapter II of chapter 5 of title 5, require that such device have an approval under this section of an application for premarket approval. Authority to issue such administrative order shall not be delegated below the Director of the Center for Devices and Radiological Health, acting in consultation with the
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 21 U.S.C. § 360e
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
For purposes of this subpart:
(1) The term “premarket application” means—
(A) an application for approval of a device submitted under [section 360e(c) of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title21-section360e/c&num=0&edition=prelim) or [section 262 of title 42](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title42-section262&num=0&edition=prelim); or
(B) a product development protocol described in [section 360e(f) of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title21-section360e/f&num=0&edition=prelim).
Such term does not include a supplement, a premarket report, or a premarket notification submission.
(2) The term “premarket report” means a report submitted under [section 360e(c)(2) of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title21-section360e/c/2&num=0&edition=prelim).
(3) The term “premarket notification submission” means a report submitted under [section 360(k) of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title21-section360/k&num=0&edition=prelim).
(4)
(A) The term “supplement”, with respect to a panel-track supplement, a 180-day supplement, a real-time supplement, or an efficacy supplement, means a request to the Secretary to approve a change in a device for which—
(i) an application or report has been approved under [section 360e(d) of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title21-section360e/d&num=0&edition=prelim), or an application has been approved under [section 262 of title 42](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title42-section262&num=0&edition=prelim); or
(ii) a notice of completion has become effective under [section 360e(f) o
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 21 U.S.C. § 379i
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. The source passage cites 21 U.S.C. § 379i. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 545
TITLE 21—FOOD AND DRUGS
§ 379i
SUBPART 3—FEES RELATING TO DEVICES
§ 379i. Definitions
For purposes of this subpart:
(1)
The
term
‘‘premarket
application’’
means—
(A) an application for approval of a device
submitted under section 360e(c) of this title
or section 262 of title 42; or
(B) a product development protocol de-
scribed in section 360e(f) of this title.
Such term does not include a supplement, a
premarket report, or a premarket notification
submission.
(2) The term ‘‘premarket report’’ means a re-
port submitted under section 360e(c)(2) of this
title.
(3) The term ‘‘premarket notification sub-
mission’’ means a report submitted under sec-
tion 360(k) of this title.
(4)(A) The term ‘‘supplement’’, with respect
to a panel-track supplement, a 180-day supple-
ment, a real-time supplement, or an efficacy
supplement, means a request to the Secretary
to approve a change in a device for which—
(i) an application or report has been ap-
proved under section 360e(d) of this title, or
an application has been approved under sec-
tion 262 of title 42; or
(ii) a notice of completion has become ef-
fective under section 360e(f) of this title.
(B) The term ‘‘panel-track supplement’’
means a supplement to an approved premarket
application or premarket report under section
360e of this title that requests a significant
change in design or performance of the device,
or a new indication for use of the device, and
for which substantial clinical data are nec-
essary to provide a reasonable assurance of
safety and effectiveness.
(C) The term ‘‘180-day supplement’’ means a
supplement to an approved premarket applica-
tion or premarket report under section 360e of
this title that is not a panel-track supplement
and requests a significant change
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 21 U.S.C. § 379i
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. The source passage cites 21 U.S.C. § 379i. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a) Types of fees**
(1) **In general** — Beginning in fiscal year 2023, the Secretary shall assess and collect fees in accordance with this section.
(2) **Premarket application, premarket report, supplement, and submission fee, and annual fee for periodic reporting concerning a class III device**
(A) *In general* — Except as provided in subparagraph (B) and subsections (d) and (e), each person who submits any of the following, on or after October 1, 2022, shall be subject to a fee established under subsection (c) for the fiscal year involved in accordance with the following:
(i) A premarket application.
(ii) For a premarket report, a fee equal to the fee that applies under clause (i).
(iii) For a panel track supplement, a fee equal to 80 percent of the fee that applies under clause (i).
(iv) For a 180-day supplement, a fee equal to 15 percent of the fee that applies under clause (i).
(v) For a real-time supplement, a fee equal to 7 percent of the fee that applies under clause (i).
(vi) For a 30-day notice, a fee equal to 1.6 percent of the fee that applies under clause (i).
(vii) For an efficacy supplement, a fee equal to the fee that applies under clause (i).
(viii) For a premarket notification submission, a fee equal to 4.5 percent of the fee that applies under clause (i).
(ix) For a request for classification information, a fee equal to 1.35 percent of the fee that applies under clause (i).
(x) For periodic reporting concerning a class III device, an annual fee equal to 3.5 percent of the fee that applies under clause (i).
(xi) For a de novo classification request, a fee equal to 30 percent of the fee that applies under clause (i).
(B) *Exceptions*
(i) *Humanitarian device exemption* — An applicati
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 21 U.S.C. § 379j
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. The source passage cites 21 U.S.C. § 379j. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 549
TITLE 21—FOOD AND DRUGS
§ 379j
of fees paid for each such type of application or noti-
fication, from businesses with gross receipts or sales
from $0 to $100,000,000, with such businesses cat-
egorized in $10,000,000 intervals; and
‘‘(2) a certification by the Secretary that the
amounts appropriated for salaries and expenses of the
Food and Drug Administration for such fiscal year
and obligated by the Secretary for the performance of
any function relating to devices that is not for the
process for the review of device applications, as de-
fined in paragraph (5) [now (8)] of section 737 of the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 379i),
are not less than such amounts for fiscal year 2002
multiplied by the adjustment factor, as defined in
paragraph (7) [now (10)] of such section 737.’’
STUDY
Pub. L. 107–250, title I, § 104(b), Oct. 26, 2002, 116 Stat.
1601, directed the Secretary of Health and Human Serv-
ices to conduct a study for the purpose of making cer-
tain determinations regarding the medical device user-
fee program established under the amendment made by
section 102 of Pub. L. 107–250 and to submit a report to
Congress by Jan. 10, 2007.
CONSULTATION
Pub. L. 107–250, title I, § 105, Oct. 26, 2002, 116 Stat.
1601, provided that:
‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—In developing recommendations to
the Congress for the goals and plans for meeting the
goals for the process for the review of medical device
applications for fiscal years after fiscal year 2007, and
for the reauthorization of sections 737 and 738 of the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act [21 U.S.C. 379i,
379j], the Secretary of Health and Human Services (re-
ferred to in this section as the ‘Secretary’) shall con-
sult with the Committee on Energy and Commerce of
the House
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 21 U.S.C. § 379j
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. The source passage cites 21 U.S.C. § 379j. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.