Arkansas Legal Resource Navigator

6 U.S.C. § 665g — State and Local Cybersecurity Grant Pro-

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

6 U.S.C. § 665g — State and Local Cybersecurity Grant Pro-

Page 364 TITLE 6—DOMESTIC SECURITY § 665g (C) supporting the teaching of cybersecurity skills at the elementary and secondary education levels. (b) Requirements In carrying out CETAP, the Director shall— (1) ensure that the program— (A) creates and disseminates cybersecurity-focused curricula and career awareness materials appropriate for use at the elementary and secondary education lev- els; (B) conducts professional development ses- sions for teachers; (C) develops resources for the teaching of cybersecurity-focused curricula described in subparagraph (A); (D) provides direct student engagement op- portunities through camps and other pro- gramming; (E) engages with State educational agen- cies and local educational agencies to pro- mote awareness of the program and ensure that offerings align with State and local cur- ricula; (F) integrates with existing post-sec- ondary education and workforce develop- ment programs at the Department; (G) promotes and supports national stand- ards for elementary and secondary cyber education; (H) partners with cybersecurity and edu- cation stakeholder groups to expand out- reach; and (I) any other activity the Director deter- mines necessary to meet the purpose de- scribed in subsection (a)(2); and (2) enable the deployment of CETAP nation- wide, with special consideration for under- served populations or communities. (c) Briefings (1) In general Not later than 1 year after the establish- ment of CETAP, and annually thereafter, the Secretary shall brief the Committee on Home- land Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on Homeland Secu- rity of the House of Representatives on the program. (2) Contents Each briefing conducted under paragraph (1) shall include— (A) est

Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 6 U.S.C. § 665g

Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.

Original supplied file — preserved unchanged

Download original Markdown file

File SHA-256: e287118440c818cd8f4d883f99170afbbdfc48cd91f9023b9562321fbcc34980. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.

Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.

Open the recorded source website ↗

Record provenance

Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:usc2024-8f1722fb071f9391c7b5ab81
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code-2024/title-6/section-665g-state-and-local-cybersecurity-grant-pro--ca9efbd042.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: e45271eae2dc8a38b07b7fbd25b08a90e0cf0ce36ce627f389e67f4f6259d058

Source location: USCODE-2024-title6-chap1-subchapXVIII-partA-sec665g.pdf

Stored source content

Page 364 TITLE 6—DOMESTIC SECURITY § 665g (C) supporting the teaching of cybersecurity skills at the elementary and secondary education levels. (b) Requirements In carrying out CETAP, the Director shall— (1) ensure that the program— (A) creates and disseminates cybersecurity-focused curricula and career awareness materials appropriate for use at the elementary and secondary education lev- els; (B) conducts professional development ses- sions for teachers; (C) develops resources for the teaching of cybersecurity-focused curricula described in subparagraph (A); (D) provides direct student engagement op- portunities through camps and other pro- gramming; (E) engages with State educational agen- cies and local educational agencies to pro- mote awareness of the program and ensure that offerings align with State and local cur- ricula; (F) integrates with existing post-sec- ondary education and workforce develop- ment programs at the Department; (G) promotes and supports national stand- ards for elementary and secondary cyber education; (H) partners with cybersecurity and edu- cation stakeholder groups to expand out- reach; and (I) any other activity the Director deter- mines necessary to meet the purpose de- scribed in subsection (a)(2); and (2) enable the deployment of CETAP nation- wide, with special consideration for under- served populations or communities. (c) Briefings (1) In general Not later than 1 year after the establish- ment of CETAP, and annually thereafter, the Secretary shall brief the Committee on Home- land Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on Homeland Secu- rity of the House of Representatives on the program. (2) Contents Each briefing conducted under paragraph (1) shall include— (A) estimated figures on the number of students reached and teachers engaged; (B) information on outreach and engage- ment efforts, including the activities de- scribed in subsection (b)(1)(E); (C) information on any grants or coopera- tive agreements made pursuant to sub- section (e), including how any such grants or cooperative agreements are being used to en- hance cybersecurity education for under- served populations or communities; (D) information on new curricula offerings and teacher training platforms; and (E) information on coordination with post- secondary education and workforce develop- ment programs at the Department. (d) Mission promotion The Director may use appropriated amounts to purchase promotional and recognition items and marketing and advertising services to pub- licize and promote the mission and services of the Agency, support the activities of the Agen- cy, and to recruit and retain Agency personnel. (e) Grants and cooperative agreements The Director may award financial assistance in the form of grants or cooperative agreements to States, local governments, institutions of higher education (as such term is defined in sec- tion 1001 of title 20), nonprofit organizations, and other non-Federal entities as determined appropriate by the Director for the purpose of funding cybersecurity and infrastructure secu- rity education and training programs and initia- tives to— (1) carry out the purposes of CETAP; and (2) enhance CETAP to address the national shortfall of cybersecurity professionals. (Pub. L. 107–296, title XXII, § 2220, formerly § 2217, as added Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title XVII, § 1719(c), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4106; renumbered § 2220 and amended Pub. L. 117–81, div. A, title XV, § 1547(b)(1)(A)(vii), Dec. 27, 2021, 135 Stat. 2061; Pub. L. 117–263, div. G, title LXXI, § 7104, Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 3622.) Editorial Notes AMENDMENTS 2022—Subsec. (c)(2)(C) to (E). Pub. L. 117–263, § 7104(b), added subpar. (C) and redesignated former subpars. (C) and (D) as (D) and (E), respectively. Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 117–263, § 7104(a), added subsec. (e). 2021—Pub. L. 117–81 reenacted section catchline. § 665g. State and Local Cybersecurity Grant Pro- gram (a) Definitions In this section: (1) Cybersecurity Plan The term ‘‘Cybersecurity Plan’’ means a plan submitted by an eligible entity under subsection (e)(1). (2) Eligible entity The term ‘‘eligible entity’’ means a— (A) State; or (B) Tribal government. (3) Multi-entity group The term ‘‘multi-entity group’’ means a group of 2 or more eligible entities desiring a grant under this section. (4) Online service The term ‘‘online service’’ means any inter- net-facing service, including a website, email, virtual private network, or custom applica- tion. (5) Rural area The term ‘‘rural area’’ has the meaning given the term in section 5302 of title 49. (6) State and Local Cybersecurity Grant Pro- gram The term ‘‘State and Local Cybersecurity Grant Program’’ means the program estab- lished under subsection (b). (7) Tribal government The term ‘‘Tribal government’’ means the recognized governing body of any Indian or Page 365 TITLE 6—DOMESTIC SECURITY § 665g 1 So in original. The comma probably should not appear. Alaska Native Tribe, band, nation, pueblo, vil- lage, community, component band, or compo- nent reservation, that is individually identi- fied (including parenthetically) in the most re- cent list published pursuant to section 5131 of title 25. (b) Establishment (1) In general There is established within the Department a program to award grants to eligible entities to address cybersecurity risks and cybersecurity threats to information systems owned or operated by, or on behalf of, State, local, or Tribal governments. (2) Application An eligible entity desiring a grant under the State and Local Cybersecurity Grant Program shall submit to the Secretary an application at such time, in such manner, and containing such information as the Secretary may re- quire. (c) Administration The State and Local Cybersecurity Grant Pro- gram shall be administered in the same office of the Department that administers grants made under sections 604 and 605 of this title. (d) Use of funds An eligible entity that receives a grant under this section and a local government that re- ceives funds from a grant under this section, as appropriate, shall use the grant to— (1) implement the Cybersecurity Plan of the eligible entity; (2) develop or revise the Cybersecurity Plan of the eligible entity; (3) pay expenses directly relating to the ad- ministration of the grant, which shall not ex- ceed 5 percent of the amount of the grant; (4) assist with activities that address immi- nent cybersecurity threats, as confirmed by the Secretary, acting through the Director, to the information systems owned or operated by, or on behalf of, the eligible entity or a local government within the jurisdiction of the eligible entity; or (5) fund any other appropriate activity de- termined by the Secretary, acting through the Director. (e) Cybersecurity plans (1) In general An eligible entity applying for a grant under this section shall submit to the Secretary a Cybersecurity Plan for review in accordance with subsection (i). (2) Required elements A Cybersecurity Plan of an eligible entity shall— (A) incorporate, to the extent prac- ticable— (i) any existing plans of the eligible enti- ty to protect against cybersecurity risks and cybersecurity threats to information systems owned or operated by, or on behalf of, State, local, or Tribal governments; and (ii) if the eligible entity is a State, con- sultation and feedback from local govern- ments and associations of local govern- ments within the jurisdiction of the eligi- ble entity; (B) describe, to the extent practicable, how the eligible entity will— (i) manage, monitor, and track informa- tion systems, applications, and user ac- counts owned or operated by, or on behalf of, the eligible entity or, if the eligible en- tity is a State, local governments within the jurisdiction of the eligible entity, and the information technology deployed on those information systems, including leg- acy information systems and information technology that are no longer supported by the manufacturer of the systems or technology; (ii) monitor, audit, and,1 track network traffic and activity transiting or traveling to or from information systems, applica- tions, and user accounts owned or operated by, or on behalf of, the eligible entity or, if the eligible entity is a State, local gov- ernments within the jurisdiction of the eli- gible entity; (iii) enhance the preparation, response, and resiliency of information systems, ap- plications, and user accounts owned or op- erated by, or on behalf of, the eligible enti- ty or, if the eligible entity is a State, local governments within the jurisdiction of the eligible entity, against cybersecurity risks and cybersecurity threats; (iv) implement a process of continuous cybersecurity vulnerability assessments and threat mitigation practices prioritized by degree of risk to address cybersecurity risks and cybersecurity threats on infor- mation systems, applications, and user ac- counts owned or operated by, or on behalf of, the eligible entity or, if the eligible en- tity is a State, local governments within the jurisdiction of the eligible entity; (v) ensure that the eligible entity and, if the eligible entity is a State, local govern- ments within the jurisdiction of the eligi- ble entity, adopt and use best practices and methodologies to enhance cybersecurity, such as— (I) the practices set forth in the cybersecurity framework developed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology; (II) cyber chain supply chain risk man- agement best practices identified by the National Institute of Standards and Technology; and (III) knowledge bases of adversary tools and tactics; (vi) promote the delivery of safe, rec- ognizable, and trustworthy online services by the eligible entity and, if the eligible entity is a State, local governments with- in the jurisdiction of the eligible entity, including through the use of the .gov internet domain; (vii) ensure continuity of operations of the eligible entity and, if the eligible enti- Page 366 TITLE 6—DOMESTIC SECURITY § 665g ty is a State, local governments within the jurisdiction of the eligible entity, in the event of a cybersecurity incident, includ- ing by conducting exercises to practice re- sponding to a cybersecurity incident; (viii) use the National Initiative for Cybersecurity Education Workforce Framework for Cybersecurity developed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology to identify and mitigate any gaps in the cybersecurity workforces of the eligible entity and, if the eligible enti- ty is a State, local governments within the jurisdiction of the eligible entity, enhance recruitment and retention efforts for those workforces, and bolster the knowledge, skills, and abilities of personnel of the eli- gible entity and, if the eligible entity is a State, local governments within the juris- diction of the eligible entity, to address cybersecurity risks and cybersecurity threats, such as through cybersecurity hy- giene training; (ix) if the eligible entity is a State, en- sure continuity of communications and data networks within the jurisdiction of the eligible entity between the eligible en- tity and local governments within the ju- risdiction of the eligible entity in the event of an incident involving those com- munications or data networks; (x) assess and mitigate, to the greatest degree possible, cybersecurity risks and cybersecurity threats relating to critical infrastructure and key resources, the deg- radation of which may impact the per- formance of information systems within the jurisdiction of the eligible entity; (xi) enhance capabilities to share cyber threat indicators and related information between the eligible entity and— (I) if the eligible entity is a State, local governments within the jurisdic- tion of the eligible entity, including by expanding information sharing agree- ments with the Department; and (II) the Department; (xii) leverage cybersecurity services of- fered by the Department; (xiii) implement an information tech- nology and operational technology mod- ernization cybersecurity review process that ensures alignment between informa- tion technology and operational tech- nology cybersecurity objectives; (xiv) develop and coordinate strategies to address cybersecurity risks and cybersecurity threats in consultation with— (I) if the eligible entity is a State, local governments and associations of local governments within the jurisdic- tion of the eligible entity; and (II) as applicable— (aa) eligible entities that neighbor the jurisdiction of the eligible entity or, as appropriate, members of an In- formation Sharing and Analysis Orga- nization; and (bb) countries that neighbor the ju- risdiction of the eligible entity; (xv) ensure adequate access to, and par- ticipation in, the services and programs described in this subparagraph by rural areas within the jurisdiction of the eligible entity; and (xvi) distribute funds, items, services, capabilities, or activities to local govern- ments under subsection (n)(2)(A), including the fraction of that distribution the eligi- ble entity plans to distribute to rural areas under subsection (n)(2)(B); (C) assess the capabilities of the eligible entity relating to the actions described in subparagraph (B); (D) describe, as appropriate and to the ex- tent practicable, the individual responsibil- ities of the eligible entity and local govern- ments within the jurisdiction of the eligible entity in implementing the plan; (E) outline, to the extent practicable, the necessary resources and a timeline for im- plementing the plan; and (F) describe the metrics the eligible entity will use to measure progress towards— (i) implementing the plan; and (ii) reducing cybersecurity risks to, and identifying, responding to, and recovering from cybersecurity threats to, information systems owned or operated by, or on behalf of, the eligible entity or, if the eligible en- tity is a State, local governments within the jurisdiction of the eligible entity. (3) Discretionary elements In drafting a Cybersecurity Plan, an eligible entity may— (A) consult with the Multi-State Informa- tion Sharing and Analysis Center; (B) include a description of cooperative programs developed by groups of local gov- ernments within the jurisdiction of the eligi- ble entity to address cybersecurity risks and cybersecurity threats; and (C) include a description of programs pro- vided by the eligible entity to support local governments and owners and operators of critical infrastructure to address cybersecurity risks and cybersecurity threats. (f) Multi-entity grants (1) In general The Secretary may award grants under this section to a multi-entity group to support multi-entity efforts to address cybersecurity risks and cybersecurity threats to information systems within the jurisdictions of the eligible entities that comprise the multi-entity group. (2) Satisfaction of other requirements In order to be eligible for a multi-entity grant under this subsection, each eligible enti- ty that comprises a multi-entity group shall have— (A) a Cybersecurity Plan that has been re- viewed by the Secretary in accordance with subsection (i); and (B) a cybersecurity planning committee established in accordance with subsection (g). Page 367 TITLE 6—DOMESTIC SECURITY § 665g (3) Application (A) In general A multi-entity group applying for a multi- entity grant under paragraph (1) shall sub- mit to the Secretary an application at such time, in such manner, and containing such information as the Secretary may require. (B) Multi-entity project plan An application for a grant under this sec- tion of a multi-entity group under subpara- graph (A) shall include a plan describing— (i) the division of responsibilities among the eligible entities that comprise the multi-entity group; (ii) the distribution of funding from the grant among the eligible entities that comprise the multi-entity group; and (iii) how the eligible entities that com- prise the multi-entity group will work to- gether to implement the Cybersecurity Plan of each of those eligible entities. (g) Planning committees (1) In general An eligible entity that receives a grant under this section shall establish a cybersecurity planning committee to— (A) assist with the development, imple- mentation, and revision of the Cybersecurity Plan of the eligible entity; (B) approve the Cybersecurity Plan of the eligible entity; and (C) assist with the determination of effec- tive funding priorities for a grant under this section in accordance with subsections (d) and (j). (2) Composition A committee of an eligible entity estab- lished under paragraph (1) shall— (A) be comprised of representatives from— (i) the eligible entity; (ii) if the eligible entity is a State, coun- ties, cities, and towns within the jurisdic- tion of the eligible entity; and (iii) institutions of public education and health within the jurisdiction of the eligi- ble entity; and (B) include, as appropriate, representatives of rural, suburban, and high-population ju- risdictions. (3) Cybersecurity expertise Not less than one-half of the representatives of a committee established under paragraph (1) shall have professional experience relating to cybersecurity or information technology. (4) Rule of construction regarding existing planning committees Nothing in this subsection shall be con- strued to require an eligible entity to estab- lish a cybersecurity planning committee if the eligible entity has established and uses a multijurisdictional planning committee or commission that— (A) meets the requirements of this sub- section; or (B) may be expanded or leveraged to meet the requirements of this subsection, includ- ing through the formation of a cybersecurity planning subcommittee. (5) Rule of construction regarding control of information systems of eligible entities Nothing in this subsection shall be con- strued to permit a cybersecurity planning committee of an eligible entity that meets the requirements of this subsection to make deci- sions relating to information systems owned or operated by, or on behalf of, the eligible en- tity. (h) Special rule for Tribal governments With respect to any requirement under sub- section (e) or (g), the Secretary, in consultation with the Secretary of the Interior and Tribal governments, may prescribe an alternative sub- stantively similar requirement for Tribal gov- ernments if the Secretary finds that the alter- native requirement is necessary for the effective delivery and administration of grants to Tribal governments under this section. (i) Review of plans (1) Review as condition of grant (A) In general Subject to paragraph (3), before an eligible entity may receive a grant under this sec- tion, the Secretary, acting through the Di- rector, shall— (i) review the Cybersecurity Plan of the eligible entity, including any revised Cybersecurity Plans of the eligible entity; and (ii) determine that the Cybersecurity Plan reviewed under clause (i) satisfies the requirements under paragraph (2). (B) Duration of determination In the case of a determination under sub- paragraph (A)(ii) that a Cybersecurity Plan satisfies the requirements under paragraph (2), the determination shall be effective for the 2-year period beginning on the date of the determination. (C) Annual renewal Not later than 2 years after the date on which the Secretary determines under sub- paragraph (A)(ii) that a Cybersecurity Plan satisfies the requirements under paragraph (2), and annually thereafter, the Secretary, acting through the Director, shall— (i) determine whether the Cybersecurity Plan and any revisions continue to meet the criteria described in paragraph (2); and (ii) renew the determination if the Sec- retary, acting through the Director, makes a positive determination under clause (i). (2) Plan requirements In reviewing a Cybersecurity Plan of an eli- gible entity under this subsection, the Sec- retary, acting through the Director, shall en- sure that the Cybersecurity Plan— (A) satisfies the requirements of sub- section (e)(2); and (B) has been approved by— (i) the cybersecurity planning committee of the eligible entity established under subsection (g); and Page 368 TITLE 6—DOMESTIC SECURITY § 665g (ii) the Chief Information Officer, the Chief Information Security Officer, or an equivalent official of the eligible entity. (3) Exception Notwithstanding subsection (e) and para- graph (1) of this subsection, the Secretary may award a grant under this section to an eligible entity that does not submit a Cybersecurity Plan to the Secretary for review before Sep- tember 30, 2023, if the eligible entity certifies to the Secretary that— (A) the activities that will be supported by the grant are— (i) integral to the development of the Cybersecurity Plan of the eligible entity; or (ii) necessary to assist with activities de- scribed in subsection (d)(4), as confirmed by the Director; and (B) the eligible entity will submit to the Secretary a Cybersecurity Plan for review under this subsection by September 30, 2023. (4) Rule of construction Nothing in this subsection shall be con- strued to provide authority to the Secretary to— (A) regulate the manner by which an eligi- ble entity or local government improves the cybersecurity of the information systems owned or operated by, or on behalf of, the el- igible entity or local government; or (B) condition the receipt of grants under this section on— (i) participation in a particular Federal program; or (ii) the use of a specific product or tech- nology. (j) Limitations on uses of funds (1) In general Any entity that receives funds from a grant under this section may not use the grant— (A) to supplant State or local funds; (B) for any recipient cost-sharing con- tribution; (C) to pay a ransom; (D) for recreational or social purposes; or (E) for any purpose that does not address cybersecurity risks or cybersecurity threats on information systems owned or operated by, or on behalf of, the eligible entity that receives the grant or a local government within the jurisdiction of the eligible entity. (2) Compliance oversight In addition to any other remedy available, the Secretary may take such actions as are necessary to ensure that a recipient of a grant under this section uses the grant for the pur- poses for which the grant is awarded. (3) Rule of construction Nothing in paragraph (1)(A) shall be con- strued to prohibit the use of funds from a grant under this section awarded to a State, local, or Tribal government for otherwise per- missible uses under this section on the basis that the State, local, or Tribal government has previously used State, local, or Tribal funds to support the same or similar uses. (k) Opportunity to amend applications In considering applications for grants under this section, the Secretary shall provide appli- cants with a reasonable opportunity to correct any defects in those applications before making final awards, including by allowing applicants to revise a submitted Cybersecurity Plan. (l) Apportionment For fiscal year 2022 and each fiscal year there- after, the Secretary shall apportion amounts ap- propriated to carry out this section among eligi- ble entities as follows: (1) Baseline amount The Secretary shall first apportion— (A) 0.25 percent of such amounts to each of American Samoa, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, Guam, and the United States Virgin Islands; (B) 1 percent of such amounts to each of the remaining States; and (C) 3 percent of such amounts to Tribal governments. (2) Remainder The Secretary shall apportion the remainder of such amounts to States as follows: (A) 50 percent of such remainder in the ratio that the population of each State, bears to the population of all States; and (B) 50 percent of such remainder in the ratio that the population of each State that resides in rural areas, bears to the popu- lation of all States that resides in rural areas. (3) Apportionment among Tribal governments In determining how to apportion amounts to Tribal governments under paragraph (1)(C), the Secretary shall consult with the Secretary of the Interior and Tribal governments. (4) Multi-entity grants An amount received from a multi-entity grant awarded under subsection (f)(1) by a State or Tribal government that is a member of the multi-entity group shall qualify as an apportionment for the purpose of this sub- section. (m) Federal share (1) In general The Federal share of the cost of an activity carried out using funds made available with a grant under this section may not exceed— (A) in the case of a grant to an eligible en- tity— (i) for fiscal year 2022, 90 percent; (ii) for fiscal year 2023, 80 percent; (iii) for fiscal year 2024, 70 percent; and (iv) for fiscal year 2025, 60 percent; and (B) in the case of a grant to a multi-entity group— (i) for fiscal year 2022, 100 percent; (ii) for fiscal year 2023, 90 percent; (iii) for fiscal year 2024, 80 percent; and (iv) for fiscal year 2025, 70 percent. (2) Waiver (A) In general The Secretary may waive or modify the re- quirements of paragraph (1) if an eligible en- Page 369 TITLE 6—DOMESTIC SECURITY § 665g tity or multi-entity group demonstrates eco- nomic hardship. (B) Guidelines The Secretary shall establish and publish guidelines for determining what constitutes economic hardship for the purposes of this subsection. (C) Considerations In developing guidelines under subpara- graph (B), the Secretary shall consider, with respect to the jurisdiction of an eligible en- tity— (i) changes in rates of unemployment in the jurisdiction from previous years; (ii) changes in the percentage of individ- uals who are eligible to receive benefits under the supplemental nutrition assist- ance program established under the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 (7 U.S.C. 2011 et seq.) from previous years; and (iii) any other factors the Secretary con- siders appropriate. (3) Waiver for Tribal governments Notwithstanding paragraph (2), the Sec- retary, in consultation with the Secretary of the Interior and Tribal governments, may waive or modify the requirements of para- graph (1) for 1 or more Tribal governments if the Secretary determines that the waiver is in the public interest. (n) Responsibilities of grantees (1) Certification Each eligible entity or multi-entity group that receives a grant under this section shall certify to the Secretary that the grant will be used— (A) for the purpose for which the grant is awarded; and (B) in compliance with subsections (d) and (j). (2) Availability of funds to local governments and rural areas (A) In general Subject to subparagraph (C), not later than 45 days after the date on which an eligi- ble entity or multi-entity group receives a grant under this section, the eligible entity or multi-entity group shall, without impos- ing unreasonable or unduly burdensome re- quirements as a condition of receipt, obli- gate or otherwise make available to local governments within the jurisdiction of the eligible entity or the eligible entities that comprise the multi-entity group, consistent with the Cybersecurity Plan of the eligible entity or the Cybersecurity Plans of the eli- gible entities that comprise the multi-entity group— (i) not less than 80 percent of funds avail- able under the grant; (ii) with the consent of the local govern- ments, items, services, capabilities, or ac- tivities having a value of not less than 80 percent of the amount of the grant; or (iii) with the consent of the local govern- ments, grant funds combined with other items, services, capabilities, or activities having the total value of not less than 80 percent of the amount of the grant. (B) Availability to rural areas In obligating funds, items, services, capa- bilities, or activities to local governments under subparagraph (A), the eligible entity or eligible entities that comprise the multi- entity group shall ensure that rural areas within the jurisdiction of the eligible entity or the eligible entities that comprise the multi-entity group receive not less than— (i) 25 percent of the amount of the grant awarded to the eligible entity; (ii) items, services, capabilities, or ac- tivities having a value of not less than 25 percent of the amount of the grant award- ed to the eligible entity; or (iii) grant funds combined with other items, services, capabilities, or activities having the total value of not less than 25 percent of the grant awarded to the eligi- ble entity. (C) Exceptions This paragraph shall not apply to— (i) any grant awarded under this section that solely supports activities that are in- tegral to the development or revision of the Cybersecurity Plan of the eligible enti- ty; or (ii) the District of Columbia, the Com- monwealth of Puerto Rico, American Samoa, the Commonwealth of the North- ern Mariana Islands, Guam, the United States Virgin Islands, or a Tribal govern- ment. (3) Certifications regarding distribution of grant funds to local governments An eligible entity or multi-entity group shall certify to the Secretary that the eligible entity or multi-entity group has made the dis- tribution to local governments required under paragraph (2). (4) Extension of period (A) In general An eligible entity or multi-entity group may request in writing that the Secretary extend the period of time specified in para- graph (2) for an additional period of time. (B) Approval The Secretary may approve a request for an extension under subparagraph (A) if the Secretary determines the extension is nec- essary to ensure that the obligation and ex- penditure of grant funds align with the pur- pose of the State and Local Cybersecurity Grant Program. (5) Direct funding If an eligible entity does not make a dis- tribution to a local government required under paragraph (2) in a timely fashion, the local government may petition the Secretary to request the Secretary to provide funds di- rectly to the local government. (6) Limitation on construction A grant awarded under this section may not be used to acquire land or to construct, re- Page 370 TITLE 6—DOMESTIC SECURITY § 665g model, or perform alterations of buildings or other physical facilities. (7) Consultation in allocating funds An eligible entity applying for a grant under this section shall agree to consult the Chief Information Officer, the Chief Information Se- curity Officer, or an equivalent official of the eligible entity in allocating funds from a grant awarded under this section. (8) Penalties In addition to other remedies available to the Secretary, if an eligible entity violates a requirement of this subsection, the Secretary may— (A) terminate or reduce the amount of a grant awarded under this section to the eli- gible entity; or (B) distribute grant funds previously awarded to the eligible entity— (i) in the case of an eligible entity that is a State, directly to the appropriate local government as a replacement grant in an amount determined by the Secretary; or (ii) in the case of an eligible entity that is a Tribal government, to another Tribal government or Tribal governments as a re- placement grant in an amount determined by the Secretary. (o) Consultation with State, local, and Tribal rep- resentatives In carrying out this section, the Secretary shall consult with State, local, and Tribal rep- resentatives with professional experience relat- ing to cybersecurity, including representatives of associations representing State, local, and Tribal governments, to inform— (1) guidance for applicants for grants under this section, including guidance for Cybersecurity Plans; (2) the study of risk-based formulas required under subsection (q)(4); (3) the development of guidelines required under subsection (m)(2)(B); and (4) any modifications described in subsection (q)(2)(D). (p) Notification to Congress Not later than 3 business days before the date on which the Department announces the award of a grant to an eligible entity under this sec- tion, including an announcement to the eligible entity, the Secretary shall provide to the appro- priate congressional committees notice of the announcement. (q) Reports, study, and review (1) Annual reports by grant recipients (A) In general Not later than 1 year after the date on which an eligible entity receives a grant under this section for the purpose of imple- menting the Cybersecurity Plan of the eligi- ble entity, including an eligible entity that comprises a multi-entity group that receives a grant for that purpose, and annually there- after until 1 year after the date on which funds from the grant are expended or re- turned, the eligible entity shall submit to the Secretary a report that, using the metrics described in the Cybersecurity Plan of the eligible entity, describes the progress of the eligible entity in— (i) implementing the Cybersecurity Plan of the eligible entity; and (ii) reducing cybersecurity risks to, and identifying, responding to, and recovering from cybersecurity threats to, information systems owned or operated by, or on behalf of, the eligible entity or, if the eligible en- tity is a State, local governments within the jurisdiction of the eligible entity. (B) Absence of plan Not later than 1 year after the date on which an eligible entity that does not have a Cybersecurity Plan receives funds under this section, and annually thereafter until 1 year after the date on which funds from the grant are expended or returned, the eligible entity shall submit to the Secretary a report describing how the eligible entity obligated and expended grant funds to— (i) develop or revise a Cybersecurity Plan; or (ii) assist with the activities described in subsection (d)(4). (2) Annual reports to Congress Not less frequently than annually, the Sec- retary, acting through the Director, shall sub- mit to Congress a report on— (A) the use of grants awarded under this section; (B) the proportion of grants used to sup- port cybersecurity in rural areas; (C) the effectiveness of the State and Local Cybersecurity Grant Program; (D) any necessary modifications to the State and Local Cybersecurity Grant Pro- gram; and (E) any progress made toward— (i) developing, implementing, or revising Cybersecurity Plans; and (ii) reducing cybersecurity risks to, and identifying, responding to, and recovering from cybersecurity threats to, information systems owned or operated by, or on behalf of, State, local, or Tribal governments as a result of the award of grants under this section. (3) Public availability (A) In general The Secretary, acting through the Direc- tor, shall make each report submitted under paragraph (2) publicly available, including by making each report available on the website of the Agency. (B) Redactions In making each report publicly available under subparagraph (A), the Director may make redactions that the Director, in con- sultation with each eligible entity, deter- mines necessary to protect classified or other information exempt from disclosure under section 552 of title 5 (commonly re- ferred to as the ‘‘Freedom of Information Act’’). (4) Study of risk-based formulas (A) In general Not later than September 30, 2024, the Sec- retary, acting through the Director, shall Page 371 TITLE 6—DOMESTIC SECURITY § 665g submit to the appropriate congressional committees a study and legislative rec- ommendations on the potential use of a risk- based formula for apportioning funds under this section, including— (i) potential components that could be included in a risk-based formula, including the potential impact of those components on support for rural areas under this sec- tion; (ii) potential sources of data and infor- mation necessary for the implementation of a risk-based formula; (iii) any obstacles to implementing a risk-based formula, including obstacles that require a legislative solution; (iv) if a risk-based formula were to be implemented for fiscal year 2026, a rec- ommended risk-based formula for the State and Local Cybersecurity Grant Pro- gram; and (v) any other information that the Sec- retary, acting through the Director, deter- mines necessary to help Congress under- stand the progress towards, and obstacles to, implementing a risk-based formula. (B) Inapplicability of Paperwork Reduction Act The requirements of chapter 35 of title 44 (commonly referred to as the ‘‘Paperwork Reduction Act’’), shall not apply to any ac- tion taken to carry out this paragraph. (5) Tribal cybersecurity needs report Not later than 2 years after November 15, 2021, the Secretary, acting through the Direc- tor, shall submit to Congress a report that— (A) describes the cybersecurity needs of Tribal governments, which shall be deter- mined in consultation with the Secretary of the Interior and Tribal governments; and (B) includes any recommendations for ad- dressing the cybersecurity needs of Tribal governments, including any necessary modi- fications to the State and Local Cybersecurity Grant Program to better serve Tribal governments. (6) GAO review Not later than 3 years after November 15, 2021, the Comptroller General of the United States shall conduct a review of the State and Local Cybersecurity Grant Program, includ- ing— (A) the grant selection process of the Sec- retary; and (B) a sample of grants awarded under this section. (r) Authorization of appropriations (1) In general There are authorized to be appropriated for activities under this section— (A) for fiscal year 2022, $200,000,000; (B) for fiscal year 2023, $400,000,000; (C) for fiscal year 2024, $300,000,000; and (D) for fiscal year 2025, $100,000,000. (2) Transfers authorized (A) In general During a fiscal year, the Secretary or the head of any component of the Department that administers the State and Local Cybersecurity Grant Program may transfer not more than 5 percent of the amounts ap- propriated pursuant to paragraph (1) or other amounts appropriated to carry out the State and Local Cybersecurity Grant Pro- gram for that fiscal year to an account of the Department for salaries, expenses, and other administrative costs incurred for the management, administration, or evaluation of this section. (B) Additional appropriations Any funds transferred under subparagraph (A) shall be in addition to any funds appro- priated to the Department or the compo- nents described in subparagraph (A) for sala- ries, expenses, and other administrative costs. (s) Termination (1) In general Subject to paragraph (2), the requirements of this section shall terminate on September 30, 2025. (2) Exception The reporting requirements under sub- section (q) shall terminate on the date that is 1 year after the date on which the final funds from a grant under this section are expended or returned. (Pub. L. 107–296, title XXII, § 2220A, formerly § 2218, as added Pub. L. 117–58, div. G, title VI, § 70612(a), Nov. 15, 2021, 135 Stat. 1272; renum- bered § 2220A and amended Pub. L. 117–81, div. A, title XV, § 1547(b)(1)(A)(viii), Dec. 27, 2021, 135 Stat. 2061; Pub. L. 117–263, div. G, title LXXI, § 7143(b)(2)(K), Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 3660.) Editorial Notes REFERENCES IN TEXT The Food and Nutrition Act of 2008, referred to in subsec. (m)(2)(C)(ii), is Pub. L. 88–525, Aug. 31, 1964, 78 Stat. 703, which is classified generally to chapter 51 (§ 2011 et seq.) of Title 7, Agriculture. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 2011 of Title 7 and Tables. AMENDMENTS 2022—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 117–263, § 7143(b)(2)(K)(i), re- designated pars. (3), (4), and (8) to (12) as (1) to (7), re- spectively, and struck out former pars. (1), (2), and (5) to (7) which defined appropriate committees of Con- gress, cyber threat indicator, incident, information sharing and analysis organization, and information sys- tem, respectively. Subsec. (e)(2)(B)(xiv)(II)(aa). Pub. L. 117–263, § 7143(b)(2)(K)(ii), substituted ‘‘Information Sharing and Analysis Organization’’ for ‘‘information sharing and analysis organization’’. Subsec. (p). Pub. L. 117–263, § 7143(b)(2)(K)(iii), sub- stituted ‘‘appropriate congressional committees’’ for ‘‘appropriate committees of Congress’’. Subsec. (q)(4)(A). Pub. L. 117–263, § 7143(b)(2)(K)(iv), which directed amendment of subsec. (q)(4) by sub- stituting ‘‘appropriate congressional committees’’ for ‘‘appropriate committees of Congress’’ ‘‘in the matter preceding clause (i)’’, was executed by making the sub- stitution in the introductory provisions of subsec. (q)(4)(A), to reflect the probable intent of Congress. 2021—Pub. L. 117–81 reenacted section catchline. Page 372 TITLE 6—DOMESTIC SECURITY § 665h § 665h. National Cyber Exercise Program (a) Establishment of program (1) In general There is established in the Agency the Na- tional Cyber Exercise Program (referred to in this section as the ‘‘Exercise Program’’) to evaluate the National Cyber Incident Re- sponse Plan, and other related plans and strat- egies. (2) Requirements (A) In general The Exercise Program shall be— (i) based on current risk assessments, in- cluding credible threats, vulnerabilities, and consequences; (ii) designed, to the extent practicable, to simulate the partial or complete inca- pacitation of a government or critical in- frastructure network resulting from a cyber incident; (iii) designed to provide for the system- atic evaluation of cyber readiness and en- hance operational understanding of the cyber incident response system and rel- evant information sharing agreements; and (iv) designed to promptly develop after- action reports and plans that can quickly incorporate lessons learned into future op- erations. (B) Model exercise selection The Exercise Program shall— (i) include a selection of model exercises that government and private entities can readily adapt for use; and (ii) aid such governments and private en- tities with the design, implementation, and evaluation of exercises that— (I) conform to the requirements de- scribed in subparagraph (A); (II) are consistent with any applicable national, State, local, or Tribal strategy or plan; and (III) provide for systematic evaluation of readiness. (3) Consultation In carrying out the Exercise Program, the Director may consult with appropriate rep- resentatives from Sector Risk Management Agencies, the Office of the National Cyber Di- rector, cybersecurity research stakeholders, and Sector Coordinating Councils. (b) Definitions In this section: (1) State The term ‘‘State’’ means any State of the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Northern Mariana Islands, the United States Virgin Is- lands, Guam, American Samoa, and any other territory or possession of the United States. (2) Private entity The term ‘‘private entity’’ has the meaning given such term in section 1501 of this title. (c) Rule of construction Nothing in this section shall be construed to affect the authorities or responsibilities of the Administrator of the Federal Emergency Man- agement Agency pursuant to section 748 of this title. (Pub. L. 107–296, title XXII, § 2220B, as added Pub. L. 117–81, div. A, title XV, § 1547(a), Dec. 27, 2021, 135 Stat. 2059.) § 665i. CyberSentry program (a) Establishment There is established in the Agency a program, to be known as ‘‘CyberSentry’’, to provide con- tinuous monitoring and detection of cybersecurity risks to critical infrastructure en- tities that own or operate industrial control sys- tems that support national critical functions, upon request and subject to the consent of such owner or operator. (b) Activities The Director, through CyberSentry, shall— (1) enter into strategic partnerships with critical infrastructure owners and operators that, in the determination of the Director and subject to the availability of resources, own or operate regionally or nationally significant in- dustrial control systems that support national critical functions, in order to provide tech- nical assistance in the form of continuous monitoring of industrial control systems and the information systems that support such systems and detection of cybersecurity risks to such industrial control systems and other cybersecurity services, as appropriate, based on and subject to the agreement and consent of such owner or operator; (2) leverage sensitive or classified intel- ligence about cybersecurity risks regarding particular sectors, particular adversaries, and trends in tactics, techniques, and procedures to advise critical infrastructure owners and operators regarding mitigation measures and share information as appropriate; (3) identify cybersecurity risks in the infor- mation technology and information systems that support industrial control systems which could be exploited by adversaries attempting to gain access to such industrial control sys- tems, and work with owners and operators to remediate such vulnerabilities; (4) produce aggregated, anonymized analytic products, based on threat hunting and contin- uous monitoring and detection activities and partnerships, with findings and recommenda- tions that can be disseminated to critical in- frastructure owners and operators; and (5) support activities authorized in accord- ance with section 1501 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2022. (c) Privacy review Not later than 180 days after December 27, 2021, the Privacy Officer of the Agency under section 652(h) of this title shall— (1) review the policies, guidelines, and ac- tivities of CyberSentry for compliance with all applicable privacy laws, including such laws governing the acquisition, interception, reten- tion, use, and disclosure of communities; and (2) submit to the Committee on Homeland Security of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Homeland Security and

Cross-references

Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

6 U.S.C. § 665g — National asset database

**(a) Establishment** (1) **National asset database** — The Secretary shall establish and maintain a national database of each system or asset that— (A) the Secretary, in consultation with appropriate homeland security officials of the States, determines to be vital and the loss, interruption, incapacity, or destruction of which would have a negative or debilitating effect on the economic security, public health, or safety of the United States, any State, or any local government; or (B) the Secretary determines is appropriate for inclusion in the database. (2) **Prioritized critical infrastructure list** — In accordance with Homeland Security Presidential Directive–7, as in effect on January 1, 2007, the Secretary shall establish and maintain a single classified prioritized list of systems and assets included in the database under paragraph (1) that the Secretary determines would, if destroyed or disrupted, cause national or regional catastrophic effects. **(b) Use of database** The Secretary shall use the database established under subsection (a)(1) in the development and implementation of Department plans and programs as appropriate. **(c) Maintenance of database** (1) **In general** — The Secretary shall maintain and annually update the database established under subsection (a)(1) and the list established under subsection (a)(2), including— (A) establishing data collection guidelines and providing such guidelines to the appropriate homeland security official of each State; (B) regularly reviewing the guidelines established under subparagraph (A), including by consulting with the appropriate homeland security officials of States, to solicit feedback about the guidelines, as appropriate; (C) after providing the homeland security official of a State

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 6 U.S.C. § 665g

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

7 U.S.C. § 2011 — Congressional declaration of policy

It is declared to be the policy of Congress, in order to promote the general welfare, to safeguard the health and well-being of the Nation’s population by raising levels of nutrition among low-income households. Congress finds that the limited food purchasing power of low-income households contributes to hunger and malnutrition among members of such households. Congress further finds that increased utilization of food in establishing and maintaining adequate national levels of nutrition will promote the distribution in a beneficial manner of the Nation’s agricultural abundance and will strengthen the Nation’s agricultural economy, as well as result in more orderly marketing and distribution of foods. To alleviate such hunger and malnutrition, a supplemental nutrition assistance program is herein authorized which will permit low-income households to obtain a more nutritious diet through normal channels of trade by increasing food purchasing power for all eligible households who apply for participation.

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 7 U.S.C. § 2011

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. The source passage cites 7 U.S.C. § 2011. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

7 U.S.C. § 2011 — Congressional declaration of policy

Page 1226 TITLE 7—AGRICULTURE §§ 2009ee to 2009ee–3 SUBCHAPTER X—SEARCH GRANTS FOR SMALL COMMUNITIES §§ 2009ee to 2009ee–3. Repealed. Pub. L. 110–234, title VI, § 6002(b), May 22, 2008, 122 Stat. 1162, and Pub. L. 110–246, § 4(a), title VI, § 6002(b), June 18, 2008, 122 Stat. 1664, 1923 Section 2009ee, Pub. L. 107–171, title VI, § 6301, May 13, 2002, 116 Stat. 421, defined terms. Section 2009ee–1, Pub. L. 107–171, title VI, § 6302, May 13, 2002, 116 Stat. 422, related to SEARCH grant pro- gram. See section 1926 of this title. Section 2009ee–2, Pub. L. 107–171, title VI, § 6303, May 13, 2002, 116 Stat. 424, related to annual report on projects. Section 2009ee–3, Pub. L. 107–171, title VI, § 6304, May 13, 2002, 116 Stat. 424, related to funding. Editorial Notes CODIFICATION Pub. L. 110–234 and Pub. L. 110–246 repealed this sub- chapter. Pub. L. 110–234 was repealed by section 4(a) of Pub. L. 110–246. Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries EFFECTIVE DATE OF REPEAL Repeal of this subchapter and repeal of Pub. L. 110–234 by Pub. L. 110–246 effective May 22, 2008, the date of enactment of Pub. L. 110–234, see section 4 of Pub. L. 110–246, set out as an Effective Date note under section 8701 of this title. CHAPTER 51—SUPPLEMENTAL NUTRITION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM Sec. 2011. Congressional declaration of policy. 2012. Definitions. 2012a. Publicly operated community health centers. 2013. Establishment of supplemental nutrition as- sistance program. 2014. Eligible households. 2014a. Notice of change in State of residence of cer- tified household. 2015. Eligibility disqualifications. 2016. Issuance and use of program benefits. 2016a. EBT benefit fraud prevention. 2017. Value of allotment. 2018. Approval of retail food stores and wholesale

Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 7 U.S.C. § 2011

Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. The source passage cites 7 U.S.C. § 2011. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.