Browse Arkansas Code titles and sections
50 U.S.C. § 3329 — Intelligence community contracting
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 792
TITLE 50—WAR AND NATIONAL DEFENSE
§ 3326
(c) Intelligence community defined
In this section, the term ‘‘intelligence commu-
nity’’ has the meaning given that term in sec-
tion 3003(4) of this title.
(Pub. L. 106–120, title III, § 313, Dec. 3, 1999, 113
Stat. 1615.)
Editorial Notes
CODIFICATION
Section was formerly classified to section 403–8 of
this title prior to editorial reclassification and renum-
bering as this section.
§ 3326. Limitation of expenditure of funds appro-
priated for Department of Defense intel-
ligence programs
During the current fiscal year and hereafter,
none of the funds appropriated for intelligence
programs to the Department of Defense which
are transferred to another Federal agency for
execution shall be expended by the Department
of Defense in any fiscal year in excess of
amounts required for expenditure during such
fiscal year by the Federal agency to which such
funds are transferred.
(Pub. L. 102–172, title VIII, § 8089, Nov. 26, 1991,
105 Stat. 1193.)
Editorial Notes
CODIFICATION
Section was formerly classified as a note under sec-
tion 414 of this title prior to editorial reclassification
as this section.
§ 3327. Limitation on transfer of funds between
CIA and Department of Defense; congres-
sional notification required
During the current fiscal year and thereafter,
no funds may be made available through trans-
fer, reprogramming, or other means between the
Central Intelligence Agency and the Department
of Defense for any intelligence or special activ-
ity different from that previously justified to
the Congress unless the Director of Central In-
telligence or the Secretary of Defense has noti-
fied the House and Senate Appropriations Com-
mittees of the intent to make such funds avail-
able for such ac
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 50 U.S.C. § 3329
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.
Original supplied file — preserved unchanged
Download original Markdown file
File SHA-256: 64dca16d4b9ff9b18cb928cd5d5b37a11168a8a7df673498e5f731401b62c316. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.
Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.
Open the recorded source website ↗
Record provenance
Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:usc2024-8a6caa16c240c58edba36f7f
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code-2024/title-50/section-3329-intelligence-community-contracting--58de9f5cfb.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: 87063e695a7c9cf7a9cee1da868aa2ae6dcb67771b236a39eaaa62f75c6a44bc
Source location: USCODE-2024-title50-chap45-subchapII-sec3329.pdf
Stored source content
Page 792
TITLE 50—WAR AND NATIONAL DEFENSE
§ 3326
(c) Intelligence community defined
In this section, the term ‘‘intelligence commu-
nity’’ has the meaning given that term in sec-
tion 3003(4) of this title.
(Pub. L. 106–120, title III, § 313, Dec. 3, 1999, 113
Stat. 1615.)
Editorial Notes
CODIFICATION
Section was formerly classified to section 403–8 of
this title prior to editorial reclassification and renum-
bering as this section.
§ 3326. Limitation of expenditure of funds appro-
priated for Department of Defense intel-
ligence programs
During the current fiscal year and hereafter,
none of the funds appropriated for intelligence
programs to the Department of Defense which
are transferred to another Federal agency for
execution shall be expended by the Department
of Defense in any fiscal year in excess of
amounts required for expenditure during such
fiscal year by the Federal agency to which such
funds are transferred.
(Pub. L. 102–172, title VIII, § 8089, Nov. 26, 1991,
105 Stat. 1193.)
Editorial Notes
CODIFICATION
Section was formerly classified as a note under sec-
tion 414 of this title prior to editorial reclassification
as this section.
§ 3327. Limitation on transfer of funds between
CIA and Department of Defense; congres-
sional notification required
During the current fiscal year and thereafter,
no funds may be made available through trans-
fer, reprogramming, or other means between the
Central Intelligence Agency and the Department
of Defense for any intelligence or special activ-
ity different from that previously justified to
the Congress unless the Director of Central In-
telligence or the Secretary of Defense has noti-
fied the House and Senate Appropriations Com-
mittees of the intent to make such funds avail-
able for such activity.
(Pub. L. 103–139, title VIII, § 8107, Nov. 11, 1993,
107 Stat. 1464.)
Editorial Notes
CODIFICATION
Section was formerly classified as a note under sec-
tion 414 of this title prior to editorial reclassification
as this section.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
CHANGE OF NAME
Reference to the Director of Central Intelligence or
the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency in the
Director’s capacity as the head of the intelligence com-
munity deemed to be a reference to the Director of Na-
tional Intelligence. Reference to the Director of Cen-
tral Intelligence or the Director of the Central Intel-
ligence Agency in the Director’s capacity as the head of
the Central Intelligence Agency deemed to be a ref-
erence to the Director of the Central Intelligence Agen-
cy. See section 1081(a), (b) of Pub. L. 108–458, set out as
a note under section 3001 of this title.
SIMILAR PROVISIONS
Provisions similar to those in this section were con-
tained in the following prior appropriation acts:
Pub. L. 102–396, title IX, § 9014, Oct. 6, 1992, 106 Stat.
1903.
Pub. L. 102–172, title VIII, § 8014, Nov. 26, 1991, 105
Stat. 1174.
Pub. L. 101–511, title VIII, § 8015, Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat.
1878.
Pub. L. 101–165, title IX, § 9022, Nov. 21, 1989, 103 Stat.
1134.
Pub. L. 100–463, title VIII, § 8035, Oct. 1, 1988, 102 Stat.
2270–23.
Pub. L. 100–202, § 101(b) [title VIII, § 8037], Dec. 22, 1987,
101 Stat. 1329–43, 1329–68.
§ 3328. Study or plan of surrender; use of appro-
priations
No part of the funds appropriated in any act
shall be used to pay (1) any person, firm, or cor-
poration, or any combinations of persons, firms,
or corporations, to conduct a study or to plan
when and how or in what circumstances the
Government of the United States should sur-
render this country and its people to any foreign
power, (2) the salary or compensation of any em-
ployee or official of the Government of the
United States who proposes or contracts or who
has entered into contracts for the making of
studies or plans for the surrender by the Govern-
ment of the United States of this country and
its people to any foreign power in any event or
under any circumstances.
(Pub. L. 85–766, ch. XVI, § 1602, Aug. 27, 1958, 72
Stat. 884.)
Editorial Notes
CODIFICATION
Section was formerly classified to section 407 of this
title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering
as this section.
§ 3329. Intelligence community contracting
(a) In general
The Director of National Intelligence shall di-
rect that elements of the intelligence commu-
nity, whenever compatible with the national se-
curity interests of the United States and con-
sistent with the operational and security con-
cerns related to the conduct of intelligence ac-
tivities, and where fiscally sound, shall award
contracts in a manner that would maximize the
procurement of products in the United States.
(b) Intelligence community defined
In this section, the term ‘‘intelligence commu-
nity’’ has the meaning given that term in sec-
tion 3003(4) of this title.
(Pub. L. 102–183, title IV, § 403, Dec. 4, 1991, 105
Stat. 1267; Pub. L. 111–259, title VIII, § 810, Oct. 7,
2010, 124 Stat. 2750.)
Editorial Notes
CODIFICATION
Section was formerly classified to section 403–2 of
this title prior to editorial reclassification and renum-
bering as this section.
Page 793
TITLE 50—WAR AND NATIONAL DEFENSE
§ 3330
PRIOR PROVISIONS
Provisions similar to those in this section were con-
tained in the following prior authorization act: Pub. L.
102–88, title IV, § 404, Aug. 14, 1991, 105 Stat. 434.
AMENDMENTS
2010—Pub. L. 111–259 added subsec. (b), designated ex-
isting provisions as subsec. (a), inserted heading, sub-
stituted ‘‘Director of National Intelligence’’ for ‘‘Direc-
tor of Central Intelligence’’ and ‘‘intelligence commu-
nity’’ for ‘‘Intelligence Community’’, and struck out at
end ‘‘For purposes of this provision, the term ‘Intel-
ligence Community’ has the same meaning as set forth
in paragraph 3.4(f) of Executive Order 12333, dated De-
cember 4, 1981, or successor orders.’’
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
ENHANCED PROCUREMENT AUTHORITY TO MANAGE
SUPPLY CHAIN RISK
Pub. L. 112–87, title III, § 309, Jan. 3, 2012, 125 Stat.
1883, formerly set out as a note under this section, was
transferred to section 3334e of this title.
§ 3330. Reports to the intelligence community on
penetrations of networks and information
systems of certain contractors
(a) Procedures for reporting penetrations
The Director of National Intelligence shall es-
tablish procedures that require each cleared in-
telligence contractor to report to an element of
the intelligence community designated by the
Director for purposes of such procedures when a
network or information system of such con-
tractor that meets the criteria established pur-
suant to subsection (b) is successfully pene-
trated.
(b) Networks and information systems subject to
reporting
The Director of National Intelligence shall, in
consultation with appropriate officials, estab-
lish criteria for covered networks to be subject
to the procedures for reporting system penetra-
tions under subsection (a).
(c) Procedure requirements
(1) Rapid reporting
The procedures established pursuant to sub-
section (a) shall require each cleared intel-
ligence contractor to rapidly report to an ele-
ment of the intelligence community des-
ignated pursuant to subsection (a) of each suc-
cessful penetration of the network or informa-
tion systems of such contractor that meet the
criteria established pursuant to subsection (b).
Each such report shall include the following:
(A) A description of the technique or
method used in such penetration.
(B) A sample of the malicious software, if
discovered and isolated by the contractor,
involved in such penetration.
(C) A summary of information created by
or for such element in connection with any
program of such element that has been po-
tentially compromised due to such penetra-
tion.
(2) Access to equipment and information by in-
telligence community personnel
The procedures established pursuant to sub-
section (a) shall—
(A) include mechanisms for intelligence
community personnel to, upon request, ob-
tain access to equipment or information of a
cleared intelligence contractor necessary to
conduct forensic analysis in addition to any
analysis conducted by such contractor;
(B) provide that a cleared intelligence con-
tractor is only required to provide access to
equipment or information as described in
subparagraph (A) to determine whether in-
formation created by or for an element of
the intelligence community in connection
with any intelligence community program
was successfully exfiltrated from a network
or information system of such contractor
and, if so, what information was exfiltrated;
and
(C) provide for the reasonable protection of
trade secrets, commercial or financial infor-
mation, and information that can be used to
identify a specific person (other than the
name of the suspected perpetrator of the
penetration).
(3) Limitation on dissemination of certain in-
formation
The procedures established pursuant to sub-
section (a) shall prohibit the dissemination
outside the intelligence community of infor-
mation obtained or derived through such pro-
cedures that is not created by or for the intel-
ligence community except—
(A) with the approval of the contractor
providing such information;
(B) to the congressional intelligence com-
mittees or the Subcommittees on Defense of
the Committees on Appropriations of the
House of Representatives and the Senate for
such committees and such Subcommittees
to perform oversight; or
(C) to law enforcement agencies to inves-
tigate a penetration reported under this sec-
tion.
(d) Issuance of procedures and establishment of
criteria
(1) In general
Not later than 90 days after July 7, 2014, the
Director of National Intelligence shall estab-
lish the procedures required under subsection
(a) and the criteria required under subsection
(b).
(2) Applicability date
The requirements of this section shall apply
on the date on which the Director of National
Intelligence establishes the procedures re-
quired under this section.
(e) Coordination with the Secretary of Defense to
prevent duplicate reporting
Not later than 180 days after July 7, 2014, the
Director of National Intelligence and the Sec-
retary of Defense shall establish procedures to
permit a contractor that is a cleared intel-
ligence contractor and a cleared defense con-
tractor under section 941 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public
Law 112–239; 10 U.S.C. 2224 note) to submit a sin-
gle report that satisfies the requirements of this
section and such section 941 for an incident of
penetration of network or information system.
Cross-references
Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a) Defense Information Assurance Program.—** The Secretary of Defense shall carry out a program, to be known as the “Defense Information Assurance Program”, to protect and defend Department of Defense information, information systems, and information networks that are critical to the Department and the armed forces during day-to-day operations and operations in times of crisis.
**(b) Objectives of the Program.—** The objectives of the program shall be to provide continuously for the availability, integrity, authentication, confidentiality, nonrepudiation, and rapid restitution of information and information systems that are essential elements of the Defense Information Infrastructure.
**(c) Program Strategy.—** In carrying out the program, the Secretary shall develop a program strategy that encompasses those actions necessary to assure the readiness, reliability, continuity, and integrity of Defense information systems, networks, and infrastructure, including through compliance with subchapter II of chapter 35 of title 44, including through compliance with subchapter III of chapter 35 of title 44. The program strategy shall include the following:
(1) A vulnerability and threat assessment of elements of the defense and supporting nondefense information infrastructures that are essential to the operations of the Department and the armed forces.
(2) Development of essential information assurances technologies and programs.
(3) Organization of the Department, the armed forces, and supporting activities to defend against information warfare.
(4) Joint activities of the Department with other departments and agencies of the Government, State and local agencies, and elements of the national information infrastructure.
(5) The conduct of exercises, war games, simulatio
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 10 U.S.C. § 2224
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. The source passage cites 10 U.S.C. § 2224. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 1782
TITLE 10—ARMED FORCES
[§ 2223a
compliance of that infrastructure with such policies,
procedures, and practices, including automation of—
‘‘(A) management, operational, and technical
controls of every information system identified in
the inventory required under section 3505(c) of title
44, United States Code; and
‘‘(B) management, operational, and technical con-
trols relied on for evaluations under [former] sec-
tion 3545 of title 44, United States Code [see now 44
U.S.C. 3555].
‘‘(b) DEFINITIONS.—In this section:
‘‘(1) The term ‘information security incident’
means an occurrence that—
‘‘(A) actually or potentially jeopardizes the con-
fidentiality, integrity, or availability of an infor-
mation system or the information such system
processes, stores, or transmits; or
‘‘(B) constitutes a violation or imminent threat
of violation of security policies, security proce-
dures, or acceptable use policies with respect to an
information system.
‘‘(2) The term ‘information infrastructure’ means
the underlying framework, equipment, and software
that an information system and related assets rely on
to process, transmit, receive, or store information
electronically.
‘‘(3) The term ‘national security system’ has the
meaning given that term in [former] section 3542(b)(2)
of title 44, United States Code [see now 44 U.S.C.
3552(b)(6)].’’
[§ 2223a. Renumbered § 4571]
§ 2224. Defense Information Assurance Program
(a) DEFENSE
INFORMATION
ASSURANCE
PRO-
GRAM.—The Secretary of Defense shall carry out
a program, to be known as the ‘‘Defense Infor-
mation Assurance Program’’, to protect and de-
fend Department of Defense information, infor-
mation systems, and information networks that
are critical to the Department and the armed
forces during day-to-da
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 10 U.S.C. § 2224
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. The source passage cites 10 U.S.C. § 2224. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a) In general** The Director of National Intelligence shall direct that elements of the intelligence community, whenever compatible with the national security interests of the United States and consistent with the operational and security concerns related to the conduct of intelligence activities, and where fiscally sound, shall award contracts in a manner that would maximize the procurement of products in the United States.
**(b) Intelligence community defined** In this section, the term “intelligence community” has the meaning given that term in [section 3003(4) of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title50-section3003/4&num=0&edition=prelim).
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 50 U.S.C. § 3329
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.