Browse Arkansas Code titles and sections
10 U.S.C. § 1185 — Rights and procedures
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 1252
TITLE 10—ARMED FORCES
[§ 1183
when making the separation determination. The
Secretary of the military department shall re-
view the case to determine whether the reten-
tion recommendation of the board is clearly
contrary to the substantial weight of the evi-
dence in the record and whether the officer’s
conduct discredits the Service, adversely affects
good order and discipline, and adversely affects
the officer’s performance of duty.
(C) Exercise of authority to separate an officer
under this section shall be reserved for unusual
cases where such action is essential to the inter-
ests of justice, discipline, and proper adminis-
tration of the service.
(2) Authority to direct administrative separa-
tion after a board of inquiry’s recommendation
to retain an officer may only be delegated to a
civilian official within a military department
appointed by the President, by and with the ad-
vice and consent of the Senate. The least favor-
able characterization in such cases will be gen-
eral (under honorable conditions).
(3) An officer who is required to show cause for
retention on active duty under subsection (a) of
section 1181 of this title and who is determined
under paragraph (1) to have established that he
should be retained on active duty may not again
be required to show cause for retention on ac-
tive duty under such subsection within the one-
year period beginning on the date of that deter-
mination.
(4)(A) Subject to subparagraph (B), an officer
who is required to show cause for retention on
active duty under subsection (b) of section 1181
of this title and who is determined under para-
graph (1) to have established that he should be
retained on active duty may again be required
to show cause for retention at any time.
(B) An off
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 10 U.S.C. § 1185
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.
Original supplied file — preserved unchanged
Download original Markdown file
File SHA-256: 4fe4667b62a936da29c0249140b691051d00a404b9163b3213cc73e31d2b0448. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.
Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.
Open the recorded source website ↗
Record provenance
Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:usc2024-89c679e529f9d44896ff3615
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code-2024/title-10/section-1185-rights-and-procedures--9beb9815e6.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: 43f8198bf36485c3773de2a8bf7ecb5dc8f2058edebf792c0a0a874f710bd617
Source location: USCODE-2024-title10-subtitleA-partII-chap60-sec1185.pdf
Stored source content
Page 1252
TITLE 10—ARMED FORCES
[§ 1183
when making the separation determination. The
Secretary of the military department shall re-
view the case to determine whether the reten-
tion recommendation of the board is clearly
contrary to the substantial weight of the evi-
dence in the record and whether the officer’s
conduct discredits the Service, adversely affects
good order and discipline, and adversely affects
the officer’s performance of duty.
(C) Exercise of authority to separate an officer
under this section shall be reserved for unusual
cases where such action is essential to the inter-
ests of justice, discipline, and proper adminis-
tration of the service.
(2) Authority to direct administrative separa-
tion after a board of inquiry’s recommendation
to retain an officer may only be delegated to a
civilian official within a military department
appointed by the President, by and with the ad-
vice and consent of the Senate. The least favor-
able characterization in such cases will be gen-
eral (under honorable conditions).
(3) An officer who is required to show cause for
retention on active duty under subsection (a) of
section 1181 of this title and who is determined
under paragraph (1) to have established that he
should be retained on active duty may not again
be required to show cause for retention on ac-
tive duty under such subsection within the one-
year period beginning on the date of that deter-
mination.
(4)(A) Subject to subparagraph (B), an officer
who is required to show cause for retention on
active duty under subsection (b) of section 1181
of this title and who is determined under para-
graph (1) to have established that he should be
retained on active duty may again be required
to show cause for retention at any time.
(B) An officer who has been required to show
cause for retention on active duty under sub-
section (b) of section 1181 of this title and who
is thereafter retained on active duty may not
again be required to show cause for retention on
active duty under such subsection solely be-
cause of conduct which was the subject of the
previous proceedings, unless the findings or rec-
ommendations of the board of inquiry that con-
sidered his case are determined to have been ob-
tained by fraud or collusion.
(Added Pub. L. 96–513, title I, § 110, Dec. 12, 1980,
94 Stat. 2872; amended Pub. L. 105–261, div. A,
title V, § 503(b)(1), Oct. 17, 1998, 112 Stat. 2003;
Pub. L. 106–398, § 1 [[div. A], title X, § 1087(d)(2)],
Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1654, 1654A–292; Pub. L.
107–314, div. A, title V, § 506(a), Dec. 2, 2002, 116
Stat. 2534; Pub. L. 118–159, div. A, title V, § 508,
Dec. 23, 2024, 138 Stat. 1871.)
Editorial Notes
AMENDMENTS
2024—Subsec. (d)(1). Pub. L. 118–159, § 508(1), amended
par. (1) generally. Prior to amendment, par. (1) read as
follows: ‘‘If a board of inquiry determines that the offi-
cer has established that he should be retained on active
duty, the officer’s case is closed.’’
Subsec. (d)(2) to (4). Pub. L. 118–159, § 508(2), (3), added
par. (2) and redesignated former pars. (2) and (3) as (3)
and (4), respectively.
2002—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 107–314 designated existing
provisions as par. (1) and added par. (2).
2000—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 106–398 made technical cor-
rection to directory language of Pub. L. 105–261,
§ 503(b)(1). See 1998 Amendment note below.
1998—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 105–261, § 503(b)(1), as amend-
ed by Pub. L. 106–398, substituted ‘‘recommend to the
Secretary concerned that the officer not be retained on
active duty’’ for ‘‘send the record of its proceedings to
a board of review convened under section 1183 of this
title’’.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 2000 AMENDMENT
Pub. L. 106–398, § 1 [[div. A], title X, § 1087(d)], Oct. 30,
2000, 114 Stat. 1654, 1654A–292, provided that the amend-
ment made by section 1 [[div. A], title X, § 1087(d)(2)] is
effective Oct. 17, 1998, and as if included in the Strom
Thurmond National Defense Authorization Act for Fis-
cal Year 1999, Pub. L. 105–261, as enacted.
EFFECTIVE DATE
Section effective Sept. 15, 1981, but the authority to
prescribe regulations under this section effective on
Dec. 12, 1980, see section 701 of Pub. L. 96–513, set out as
an Effective Date of 1980 Amendment note under sec-
tion 101 of this title.
[§ 1183. Repealed. Pub. L. 105–261, div. A, title V,
§ 503(a), Oct. 17, 1998, 112 Stat. 2003]
Section, added Pub. L. 96–513, title I, § 110, Dec. 12,
1980, 94 Stat. 2873, related to convening and determina-
tions of boards of review.
§ 1184. Removal of officer: action by Secretary
upon recommendation of board of inquiry
The Secretary of the military department con-
cerned may remove an officer from active duty
if the removal of such officer from active duty is
recommended by a board of inquiry convened
under section 1182 of this title.
(Added Pub. L. 96–513, title I, § 110, Dec. 12, 1980,
94 Stat. 2874; amended Pub. L. 105–261, div. A,
title V, § 503(b)(2), (c)(1), Oct. 17, 1998, 112 Stat.
2003.)
Editorial Notes
AMENDMENTS
1998—Pub. L. 105–261 substituted ‘‘inquiry’’ for ‘‘re-
view’’ in section catchline and ‘‘board of inquiry con-
vened under section 1182 of this title’’ for ‘‘board of re-
view convened under section 1183 of this title’’ in text.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
EFFECTIVE DATE
Section effective Sept. 15, 1981, but the authority to
prescribe regulations under this section effective on
Dec. 12, 1980, see section 701 of Pub. L. 96–513, set out as
an Effective Date of 1980 Amendment note under sec-
tion 101 of this title.
§ 1185. Rights and procedures
(a) Under regulations prescribed by the Sec-
retary of Defense, each officer required under
section 1181 of this title to show cause for reten-
tion on active duty—
(1) shall be notified in writing, at least 30
days before the hearing of his case by a board
of inquiry, of the reasons for which he is being
required to show cause for retention on active
duty;
(2) shall be allowed a reasonable time, as de-
termined by the board of inquiry, to prepare
his showing of cause for his retention on ac-
tive duty;
Page 1253
TITLE 10—ARMED FORCES
§ 1187
(3) subject to subsection (c), shall be allowed
to appear in person and to be represented by
counsel at proceedings before the board of in-
quiry; and
(4) shall be allowed full access to, and shall
be furnished copies of, records relevant to his
case, except that the board of inquiry shall
withhold any record that the Secretary con-
cerned determines should be withheld in the
interest of national security.
(b) When a record is withheld under subsection
(a)(4), the officer whose case is under consider-
ation shall, to the extent that the interest of na-
tional security permits, be furnished a summary
of the record so withheld.
(c) The Secretary concerned may determine
that, in exceptional circumstances, the appear-
ance of an officer before the proceedings of a
board of inquiry may be via means other than in
person.
(Added Pub. L. 96–513, title I, § 110, Dec. 12, 1980,
94 Stat. 2874; amended Pub. L. 118–159, div. A,
title V, § 509(a), Dec. 23, 2024, 138 Stat. 1872.)
Editorial Notes
AMENDMENTS
2024—Subsec. (a)(3). Pub. L. 118–159, § 509(a)(1), sub-
stituted ‘‘subject to subsection (c), shall be’’ for ‘‘shall
be’’.
Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 118–159, § 509(a)(2), added subsec.
(c).
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
EFFECTIVE DATE
Section effective Sept. 15, 1981, but the authority to
prescribe regulations under this section effective on
Dec. 12, 1980, see section 701 of Pub. L. 96–513, set out as
an Effective Date of 1980 Amendment note under sec-
tion 101 of this title.
§ 1186. Officer considered for removal: voluntary
retirement or discharge
(a) At any time during proceedings under this
chapter with respect to the removal of an officer
from active duty, the Secretary of the military
department concerned may grant a request by
the officer—
(1) for voluntary retirement, if the officer is
qualified for retirement; or
(2) for discharge in accordance with sub-
section (b)(2).
(b) An officer removed from active duty under
section 1184 of this title shall—
(1) if eligible for voluntary retirement under
any provision of law on the date of such re-
moval, be retired in the grade and with the re-
tired pay for which he would be eligible if re-
tired under such provision; and
(2) if ineligible for voluntary retirement
under any provision of law on the date of such
removal—
(A) be honorably discharged in the grade
then held, in the case of an officer whose
case was brought under subsection (a) of sec-
tion 1181 of this title; or
(B) be discharged in the grade then held, in
the case of an officer whose case was brought
under subsection (b) of section 1181 of this
title.
(c) An officer who is discharged under sub-
section (b)(2) is entitled, if eligible therefor, to
separation pay under section 1174(a)(2) of this
title.
(Added Pub. L. 96–513, title I, § 110, Dec. 12, 1980,
94 Stat. 2874; amended Pub. L. 101–510, div. A,
title V, § 501(f)(1), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1550.)
Editorial Notes
AMENDMENTS
1990—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 101–510 substituted ‘‘section
1174(a)(2)’’ for ‘‘section 1174(b)’’.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
EFFECTIVE DATE
Section effective Sept. 15, 1981, but the authority to
prescribe regulations under this section effective on
Dec. 12, 1980, see section 701 of Pub. L. 96–513, set out as
an Effective Date of 1980 Amendment note under sec-
tion 101 of this title.
§ 1187. Officers eligible to serve on boards
(a) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in sub-
section (b), each board convened under this
chapter shall consist of officers appointed as fol-
lows:
(1) Each member of the board shall be an of-
ficer of the same armed force as the officer
being required to show cause for retention on
active duty.
(2) Each member of the board shall be in a
grade above major or lieutenant commander,
except that at least one member of the board
shall be in a grade above lieutenant colonel or
commander.
(3) Each member of the board shall be senior
in grade to any officer to be considered by the
board.
(b) RETIRED OFFICERS.—If qualified officers are
not available in sufficient numbers to comprise
a board convened under this chapter, the Sec-
retary of the military department concerned
shall complete the membership of the board by
appointing to the board retired officers of the
same armed force. A retired officer may be ap-
pointed to such a board only if the retired grade
of that officer—
(1) is above major or lieutenant commander
or, in the case of an officer to be the senior of-
ficer of the board, above lieutenant colonel or
commander; and
(2) is senior to the grade of any officer to be
considered by the board.
(c) INELIGIBILITY BY REASON OF PREVIOUS CON-
SIDERATION OF SAME OFFICER.—No person may be
a member of more than one board convened
under this chapter to consider the same officer.
(d) EXCLUSION FROM STRENGTH LIMITATION.—A
retired general or flag officer who is on active
duty for the purpose of serving on a board con-
vened under this chapter shall not, while so
serving, be counted against any limitation on
the number of general and flag officers who may
be on active duty.
(Added Pub. L. 96–513, title I, § 110, Dec. 12, 1980,
94 Stat. 2875; amended Pub. L. 106–65, div. A,
title V, § 504(a), Oct. 5, 1999, 113 Stat. 590; Pub. L.
110–417, [div. A], title V, § 505, Oct. 14, 2008, 122
Stat. 4434.)
Cross-references
Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a)** Under regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Defense, each officer required under [section 1181 of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title10-section1181&num=0&edition=prelim) to show cause for retention on active duty—
(1) shall be notified in writing, at least 30 days before the hearing of his case by a board of inquiry, of the reasons for which he is being required to show cause for retention on active duty;
(2) shall be allowed a reasonable time, as determined by the board of inquiry, to prepare his showing of cause for his retention on active duty;
(3) subject to subsection (c), shall be allowed to appear in person and to be represented by counsel at proceedings before the board of inquiry; and
(4) shall be allowed full access to, and shall be furnished copies of, records relevant to his case, except that the board of inquiry shall withhold any record that the Secretary concerned determines should be withheld in the interest of national security.
**(b)** When a record is withheld under subsection (a)(4), the officer whose case is under consideration shall, to the extent that the interest of national security permits, be furnished a summary of the record so withheld.
**(c)** The Secretary concerned may determine that, in exceptional circumstances, the appearance of an officer before the proceedings of a board of inquiry may be via means other than in person.
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 10 U.S.C. § 1185
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.