Browse Arkansas Code titles and sections
35 U.S.C. § 116 — Inventors
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 51
TITLE 35—PATENTS
§ 116
authorized to administer oaths in the foreign country
in which the applicant may be, whose authority is
proved by certificate of a diplomatic or consular officer
of the United States, or apostille of an official des-
ignated by a foreign country which, by treaty or con-
vention, accords like effect to apostilles of designated
officials in the United States, and such oath shall be
valid if it complies with the laws of the state or coun-
try where made. When the application is made as pro-
vided in this title by a person other than the inventor,
the oath may be so varied in form that it can be made
by him. For purposes of this section, a consular officer
shall include any United States citizen serving over-
seas, authorized to perform notarial functions pursuant
to section 1750 of the Revised Statutes, as amended (22
U.S.C. 4221).’’
1998—Pub. L. 105–277 inserted at end ‘‘For purposes of
this section, a consular officer shall include any United
States citizen serving overseas, authorized to perform
notarial functions pursuant to section 1750 of the Re-
vised Statutes, as amended (22 U.S.C. 4221).’’
1982—Pub. L. 97–247 substituted ‘‘is’’ for ‘‘shall be’’
after ‘‘whose authority’’, and inserted ‘‘, or apostille of
an official designated by a foreign country which, by
treaty or convention, accords like effect to apostilles of
designated officials in the United States’’.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 2013 AMENDMENT
Amendment by Pub. L. 112–274 effective Jan. 14, 2013,
and applicable to proceedings commenced on or after
such date, see section 1(n) of Pub. L. 112–274, set out as
a note under section 5 of this title.
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 2012 AMENDMENT
Amendment by Pub. L. 112–211 effective on the la
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 35 U.S.C. § 116
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.
Original supplied file — preserved unchanged
Download original Markdown file
File SHA-256: 4f08baf610519dce157566f42c897e7d95e5fb3404ccf2473401e9b5d2c0cbaf. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.
Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.
Open the recorded source website ↗
Record provenance
Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:usc2024-740aab03f78cdaefe13e423e
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code-2024/title-35/section-116-inventors--049abcfca1.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: 6901a4f54223faca3f501ff44a272a579182c0d555752b8e4ddd91a43b98efce
Source location: USCODE-2024-title35-partII-chap11-sec116.pdf
Stored source content
Page 51
TITLE 35—PATENTS
§ 116
authorized to administer oaths in the foreign country
in which the applicant may be, whose authority is
proved by certificate of a diplomatic or consular officer
of the United States, or apostille of an official des-
ignated by a foreign country which, by treaty or con-
vention, accords like effect to apostilles of designated
officials in the United States, and such oath shall be
valid if it complies with the laws of the state or coun-
try where made. When the application is made as pro-
vided in this title by a person other than the inventor,
the oath may be so varied in form that it can be made
by him. For purposes of this section, a consular officer
shall include any United States citizen serving over-
seas, authorized to perform notarial functions pursuant
to section 1750 of the Revised Statutes, as amended (22
U.S.C. 4221).’’
1998—Pub. L. 105–277 inserted at end ‘‘For purposes of
this section, a consular officer shall include any United
States citizen serving overseas, authorized to perform
notarial functions pursuant to section 1750 of the Re-
vised Statutes, as amended (22 U.S.C. 4221).’’
1982—Pub. L. 97–247 substituted ‘‘is’’ for ‘‘shall be’’
after ‘‘whose authority’’, and inserted ‘‘, or apostille of
an official designated by a foreign country which, by
treaty or convention, accords like effect to apostilles of
designated officials in the United States’’.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 2013 AMENDMENT
Amendment by Pub. L. 112–274 effective Jan. 14, 2013,
and applicable to proceedings commenced on or after
such date, see section 1(n) of Pub. L. 112–274, set out as
a note under section 5 of this title.
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 2012 AMENDMENT
Amendment by Pub. L. 112–211 effective on the later
of the date that is 1 year after Dec. 18, 2012, or the date
that the Geneva Act of the Hague Agreement Con-
cerning the International Registration of Industrial
Designs enters into force with respect to the United
States (May 13, 2015), and applicable only to certain ap-
plications filed on and after that effective date and pat-
ents issuing thereon, see section 103 of Pub. L. 112–211,
set out as a note under section 100 of this title.
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 2011 AMENDMENT
Amendment by Pub. L. 112–29 effective upon the expi-
ration of the 1-year period beginning on Sept. 16, 2011,
and applicable to any patent application that is filed
on or after that effective date, see section 4(e) of Pub.
L. 112–29, set out as a note under section 111 of this
title.
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1982 AMENDMENT
Amendment by Pub. L. 97–247 effective Aug. 27, 1982,
see section 17(a) of Pub. L. 97–247, set out as a note
under section 41 of this title.
§ 116. Inventors
(a) JOINT INVENTIONS.—When an invention is
made by two or more persons jointly, they shall
apply for patent jointly and each make the re-
quired oath, except as otherwise provided in this
title. Inventors may apply for a patent jointly
even though (1) they did not physically work to-
gether or at the same time, (2) each did not
make the same type or amount of contribution,
or (3) each did not make a contribution to the
subject matter of every claim of the patent.
(b) OMITTED INVENTOR.—If a joint inventor re-
fuses to join in an application for patent or can-
not be found or reached after diligent effort, the
application may be made by the other inventor
on behalf of himself and the omitted inventor.
The Director, on proof of the pertinent facts and
after such notice to the omitted inventor as he
prescribes, may grant a patent to the inventor
making the application, subject to the same
rights which the omitted inventor would have
had if he had been joined. The omitted inventor
may subsequently join in the application.
(c) CORRECTION OF ERRORS IN APPLICATION.—
Whenever through error a person is named in an
application for patent as the inventor, or
through error an inventor is not named in an ap-
plication, the Director may permit the applica-
tion to be amended accordingly, under such
terms as he prescribes.
(July 19, 1952, ch. 950, 66 Stat. 799; Pub. L. 97–247,
§ 6(a), Aug. 27, 1982, 96 Stat. 320; Pub. L. 98–622,
title I, § 104(a), Nov. 8, 1984, 98 Stat. 3384; Pub. L.
106–113,
div.
B,
§ 1000(a)(9)
[title
IV,
§ 4732(a)(10)(A)], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1536,
1501A–582; Pub. L. 107–273, div. C, title III,
§ 13206(b)(1)(B), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1906; Pub.
L. 112–29, § 20(a), Sept. 16, 2011, 125 Stat. 333.)
HISTORICAL AND REVISION NOTES
The first paragraph is implied in the present statutes,
and the part of the last paragraph relating to omission
of an erroneously joined inventor is in the Patent Of-
fice rules. The remainder is new and provides for the
correction of a mistake in erroneously joining a person
as inventor, and for filing an application when one of
several joint inventors cannot be found. This section is
ancillary to section 256.
Editorial Notes
AMENDMENTS
2011—Pub. L. 112–29 designated first to third pars. as
subsecs. (a) to (c), respectively, inserted headings, and,
in subsec. (c), struck out ‘‘and such error arose without
any deceptive intention on his part,’’ before ‘‘the Direc-
tor’’.
2002—Pub. L. 107–273 made technical correction to di-
rectory language of Pub. L. 106–113. See 1999 Amend-
ment note below.
1999—Pub. L. 106–113, as amended by Pub. L. 107–273,
substituted ‘‘Director’’ for ‘‘Commissioner’’ in two
places.
1984—Pub. L. 98–622 amended first par. generally,
striking out ‘‘and each sign the application’’ after
‘‘patent jointly’’ and inserting sentence beginning ‘‘In-
ventors may apply’’.
1982—Pub. L. 97–247 substituted ‘‘Inventors’’ for
‘‘Joint inventors’’ as section catchline, and substituted
‘‘through error a person is named in an application for
patent as the inventor, or through error an inventor is
not named in an application’’ for ‘‘a person is joined in
an application for patent as joint inventor through
error, or a joint inventor is not included in an applica-
tion through error’’.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 2011 AMENDMENT
Amendment by Pub. L. 112–29 effective upon the expi-
ration of the 1-year period beginning on Sept. 16, 2011,
and applicable to proceedings commenced on or after
that effective date, see section 20(l) of Pub. L. 112–29,
set out as a note under section 2 of this title.
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1999 AMENDMENT
Amendment by Pub. L. 106–113 effective 4 months
after Nov. 29, 1999, see section 1000(a)(9) [title IV, § 4731]
of Pub. L. 106–113, set out as a note under section 1 of
this title.
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1984 AMENDMENT
Amendment by Pub. L. 98–622 applicable to all United
States patents granted before, on, or after Nov. 8, 1984,
Page 52
TITLE 35—PATENTS
§ 117
and to all applications for United States patents pend-
ing on or filed after that date, except as otherwise pro-
vided, see section 106 of Pub. L. 98–622, set out as a note
under section 103 of this title.
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1982 AMENDMENT
Amendment by Pub. L. 97–247 effective six months
after Aug. 27, 1982, see section 17(c) of Pub. L. 97–247, set
out as an Effective Date note under section 294 of this
title.
§ 117. Death or incapacity of inventor
Legal representatives of deceased inventors
and of those under legal incapacity may make
application for patent upon compliance with the
requirements and on the same terms and condi-
tions applicable to the inventor.
(July 19, 1952, ch. 950, 66 Stat. 799.)
HISTORICAL AND REVISION NOTES
Based on Title 35, U.S.C., 1946 ed., § 46 (R.S. 4896,
amended (1) Feb. 28, 1899, ch. 227, 30 Stat. 915, (2) Mar.
3, 1903, ch. 1019, § 3, 32 Stat. 1225, 1226, (3) May 23, 1908,
ch. 188, 35 Stat. 245).
The language has been considerably simplified.
§ 118. Filing by other than inventor
A person to whom the inventor has assigned or
is under an obligation to assign the invention
may make an application for patent. A person
who otherwise shows sufficient proprietary in-
terest in the matter may make an application
for patent on behalf of and as agent for the in-
ventor on proof of the pertinent facts and a
showing that such action is appropriate to pre-
serve the rights of the parties. If the Director
grants a patent on an application filed under
this section by a person other than the inventor,
the patent shall be granted to the real party in
interest and upon such notice to the inventor as
the Director considers to be sufficient.
(July 19, 1952, ch. 950, 66 Stat. 799; Pub. L.
106–113,
div.
B,
§ 1000(a)(9)
[title
IV,
§ 4732(a)(10)(A)], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1536,
1501A–582; Pub. L. 107–273, div. C, title III,
§ 13206(b)(1)(B), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1906; Pub.
L. 112–29, § 4(b)(1), Sept. 16, 2011, 125 Stat. 296.)
HISTORICAL AND REVISION NOTES
This section is new and provides for the filing of an
application by another on behalf of the inventor in cer-
tain special hardship situations.
Editorial Notes
AMENDMENTS
2011—Pub. L. 112–29 amended section generally. Prior
to amendment, text read as follows: ‘‘Whenever an in-
ventor refuses to execute an application for patent, or
cannot be found or reached after diligent effort, a per-
son to whom the inventor has assigned or agreed in
writing to assign the invention or who otherwise shows
sufficient proprietary interest in the matter justifying
such action, may make application for patent on behalf
of and as agent for the inventor on proof of the perti-
nent facts and a showing that such action is necessary
to preserve the rights of the parties or to prevent irrep-
arable damage; and the Director may grant a patent to
such inventor upon such notice to him as the Director
deems sufficient, and on compliance with such regula-
tions as he prescribes.’’
2002—Pub. L. 107–273 made technical correction to di-
rectory language of Pub. L. 106–113. See 1999 Amend-
ment note below.
1999—Pub. L. 106–113, as amended by Pub. L. 107–273,
substituted ‘‘Director’’ for ‘‘Commissioner’’ in two
places.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 2011 AMENDMENT
Amendment by Pub. L. 112–29 effective upon the expi-
ration of the 1-year period beginning on Sept. 16, 2011,
and applicable to any patent application that is filed
on or after that effective date, see section 4(e) of Pub.
L. 112–29, set out as a note under section 111 of this
title.
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1999 AMENDMENT
Amendment by Pub. L. 106–113 effective 4 months
after Nov. 29, 1999, see section 1000(a)(9) [title IV, § 4731]
of Pub. L. 106–113, set out as a note under section 1 of
this title.
§ 119. Benefit of earlier filing date; right of pri-
ority
(a) An application for patent for an invention
filed in this country by any person who has, or
whose legal representatives or assigns have, pre-
viously regularly filed an application for a pat-
ent for the same invention in a foreign country
which affords similar privileges in the case of
applications filed in the United States or to citi-
zens of the United States, or in a WTO member
country, shall have the same effect as the same
application would have if filed in this country
on the date on which the application for patent
for the same invention was first filed in such
foreign country, if the application in this coun-
try is filed within 12 months from the earliest
date on which such foreign application was filed.
The Director may prescribe regulations, includ-
ing the requirement for payment of the fee spec-
ified in section 41(a)(7), pursuant to which the
12-month period set forth in this subsection may
be extended by an additional 2 months if the
delay in filing the application in this country
within the 12-month period was unintentional.
(b)(1) No application for patent shall be enti-
tled to this right of priority unless a claim is
filed in the Patent and Trademark Office, identi-
fying the foreign application by specifying the
application number on that foreign application,
the intellectual property authority or country
in or for which the application was filed, and the
date of filing the application, at such time dur-
ing the pendency of the application as required
by the Director.
(2) The Director may consider the failure of
the applicant to file a timely claim for priority
as a waiver of any such claim. The Director may
establish procedures, including the requirement
for payment of the fee specified in section
41(a)(7), to accept an unintentionally delayed
claim under this section.
(3) The Director may require a certified copy
of the original foreign application, specification,
and drawings upon which it is based, a trans-
lation if not in the English language, and such
other information as the Director considers nec-
essary. Any such certification shall be made by
the foreign intellectual property authority in
which the foreign application was filed and show
the date of the application and of the filing of
the specification and other papers.
(c) In like manner and subject to the same
conditions and requirements, the right provided
Cross-references
Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Every secretary of embassy or legation and consular officer is authorized, whenever he is required or deems it necessary or proper so to do, at the post, port, place, or within the limits of his embassy, legation, or consulate, to administer to or take from any person an oath, affirmation, affidavit, or deposition, and to perform any notarial act which any notary public is required or authorized by law to do within the United States. At any post, port, or place where there is no consular officer, the Secretary of State may authorize any other officer or employee of the United States Government who is a United States citizen serving overseas, including any contract employee of the United States Government, to perform such acts, and any such contractor so authorized shall not be considered to be a consular officer. Every such oath, affirmation, affidavit, deposition, and notarial act administered, sworn, affirmed, taken, had, or done, by or before any such officer, when certified under his hand and seal of office, shall be as valid, and of like force and effect within the United States, to all intents and purposes, as if administered, sworn, affirmed, taken, had, or done, by or before any other person within the United States duly authorized and competent thereto. If any person shall willfully and corruptly commit perjury, or by any means procure any person to commit perjury in any such oath, affirmation, affidavit, or deposition, within the intent and meaning of any Act of Congress now or hereafter made, such offender may be charged, proceeded against, tried, convicted, and dealt with in any district of the United States, in the same manner, in all respects, as if such offense had been committed in the United States, before any officer duly authorized therein to administ
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 22 U.S.C. § 4221
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. The source passage cites 22 U.S.C. § 4221. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 1565
TITLE 22—FOREIGN RELATIONS AND INTERCOURSE
§ 4221
charged for official services, and to designate
what shall be regarded as official services, be-
sides such as are expressly declared by law, in
the business of the several embassies, legations,
and consulates, and to adapt the same, by such
differences as may be necessary or proper, to
each embassy, legation, or consulate; and it
shall be the duty of all officers and persons con-
nected with such embassies, legations, and con-
sulates to collect for such official services such
and only such fees as may be prescribed for their
respective embassies, legations, and consulates,
and such rates or tariffs shall be reported annu-
ally to Congress.
(R.S. § 1745; Apr. 5, 1906, ch. 1366, § 3, 34 Stat. 100.)
Editorial Notes
CODIFICATION
R.S. § 1745 derived from act Aug. 18, 1856, ch. 127, § 16,
11 Stat. 57.
References to ‘‘commercial agencies’’ and ‘‘commer-
cial agency’’ were omitted in view of the abolition of
the grade of commercial agent by act Apr. 5, 1906.
Section was not enacted as part of the Foreign Serv-
ice Act of 1980 which comprises this chapter.
Section was formerly classified to section 1201 of this
title, and prior thereto to section 127 of this title.
Executive Documents
EX. ORD. NO. 10718. DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY TO
SECRETARY OF STATE
Ex. Ord. No. 10718, June 27, 1957, 22 F.R. 4632, provided:
SECTION 1. There is hereby delegated to the Secretary
of State the authority vested in the President by sec-
tion 1745 of the Revised Statutes of the United States
(22 U.S.C. 1201) [this section] to prescribe, from time to
time, the rates or tariffs of fees to be charged for offi-
cial services, and to designate what shall be regarded as
official services, besides such as are expressly dec
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 22 U.S.C. § 4221
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. The source passage cites 22 U.S.C. § 4221. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a) Joint Inventions.—** When an invention is made by two or more persons jointly, they shall apply for patent jointly and each make the required oath, except as otherwise provided in this title. Inventors may apply for a patent jointly even though (1) they did not physically work together or at the same time, (2) each did not make the same type or amount of contribution, or (3) each did not make a contribution to the subject matter of every claim of the patent.
**(b) Omitted Inventor.—** If a joint inventor refuses to join in an application for patent or cannot be found or reached after diligent effort, the application may be made by the other inventor on behalf of himself and the omitted inventor. The Director, on proof of the pertinent facts and after such notice to the omitted inventor as he prescribes, may grant a patent to the inventor making the application, subject to the same rights which the omitted inventor would have had if he had been joined. The omitted inventor may subsequently join in the application.
**(c) Correction of Errors in Application.—** Whenever through error a person is named in an application for patent as the inventor, or through error an inventor is not named in an application, the Director may permit the application to be amended accordingly, under such terms as he prescribes.
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 35 U.S.C. § 116
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.