Browse Arkansas Code titles and sections
10 U.S.C. § 126 — Transfer of funds and employees
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 145
TITLE 10—ARMED FORCES
§ 127
‘‘(A) Section 4025 of title 10, United States Code
(relating to prizes for advanced technology achieve-
ments).
‘‘(B) Section 217 of the National Defense Author-
ization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92;
10 U.S.C. 2222 note) (relating to science and tech-
nology activities to support business systems infor-
mation technology acquisition programs).
‘‘(C) Section 908 of the National Defense Author-
ization Act for Fiscal Year 2022 (Public Law 117–81;
10 U.S.C. 129a note) (relating to management inno-
vation activities).
‘‘(d) USE OF BEST PRACTICES.—In conducting the dem-
onstration required by subsection (a), the Secretary of
Defense shall leverage commercial best practices in
management and leading research in management and
data science.
‘‘(e) STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT DASHBOARD DEFINED.—
In this section, the term ‘strategic management dash-
board’ means a system for dynamically displaying
management metrics, performance goals, and other in-
formation necessary for Department of Defense leader-
ship to make strategic decisions related to the manage-
ment of the Department using modern, commercial
practices for data visualization and drawn from exist-
ing automated information systems available to the
Department.’’
IMPLEMENTING POLICIES, GUIDANCE, AND REPORTING
FRAMEWORK
Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title IX, § 911(b), Jan. 1, 2021,
134 Stat. 3801, provided that:
‘‘(1) SUBMITTAL TO CONGRESS.—Not later than March
1, 2022, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the
congressional defense committees [Committees on
Armed Services and Appropriations of the Senate and
the House of Representatives] a report setting forth the
policies, guidance, and reporting framework estab-
lished pursuant to subsection (c) of secti
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 10 U.S.C. § 126
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.
Original supplied file — preserved unchanged
Download original Markdown file
File SHA-256: 00aabadacc9c49f7b07357abc127b7228e2c251c390d74e4dace20648ce497ec. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.
Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.
Open the recorded source website ↗
Record provenance
Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:usc2024-6c15f70836f04a79b08573fe
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code-2024/title-10/section-126-transfer-of-funds-and-employees--f53fe9082b.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: e7efa24fd3fde7d9f46956c6256b112956be698b065b9d4660eb133e0afdcd9c
Source location: USCODE-2024-title10-subtitleA-partI-chap3-sec126.pdf
Stored source content
Page 145
TITLE 10—ARMED FORCES
§ 127
‘‘(A) Section 4025 of title 10, United States Code
(relating to prizes for advanced technology achieve-
ments).
‘‘(B) Section 217 of the National Defense Author-
ization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92;
10 U.S.C. 2222 note) (relating to science and tech-
nology activities to support business systems infor-
mation technology acquisition programs).
‘‘(C) Section 908 of the National Defense Author-
ization Act for Fiscal Year 2022 (Public Law 117–81;
10 U.S.C. 129a note) (relating to management inno-
vation activities).
‘‘(d) USE OF BEST PRACTICES.—In conducting the dem-
onstration required by subsection (a), the Secretary of
Defense shall leverage commercial best practices in
management and leading research in management and
data science.
‘‘(e) STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT DASHBOARD DEFINED.—
In this section, the term ‘strategic management dash-
board’ means a system for dynamically displaying
management metrics, performance goals, and other in-
formation necessary for Department of Defense leader-
ship to make strategic decisions related to the manage-
ment of the Department using modern, commercial
practices for data visualization and drawn from exist-
ing automated information systems available to the
Department.’’
IMPLEMENTING POLICIES, GUIDANCE, AND REPORTING
FRAMEWORK
Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title IX, § 911(b), Jan. 1, 2021,
134 Stat. 3801, provided that:
‘‘(1) SUBMITTAL TO CONGRESS.—Not later than March
1, 2022, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the
congressional defense committees [Committees on
Armed Services and Appropriations of the Senate and
the House of Representatives] a report setting forth the
policies, guidance, and reporting framework estab-
lished pursuant to subsection (c) of section 125a of title
10, United States Code (as added by subsection (a) of
this section).
‘‘(2) UPDATE.—Not later than 90 days after the date of
the submittal to Congress of the report required by sec-
tion 901(d) of this Act [10 U.S.C. 132a note], the Sec-
retary shall update the reporting framework referred to
in paragraph (1).’’
§ 126. Transfer of funds and employees
(a) When a function, power, or duty or an ac-
tivity of a department or agency of the Depart-
ment of Defense is transferred or assigned to an-
other department or agency of that department,
balances of appropriations that the Secretary of
Defense determines are available and needed to
finance or discharge that function, power, duty,
or activity, as the case may be, may, with the
approval of the President, be transferred to the
department or agency to which that function,
power, duty or activity, as the case may be, is
transferred, and used for any purpose for which
those appropriations were originally available.
Balances of appropriations so transferred shall—
(1) be credited to any applicable appropria-
tion account of the receiving department or
agency; or
(2) be credited to a new account that may be
established on the books of the Department of
the Treasury;
and be merged with the funds already credited
to that account and accounted for as one fund.
Balances of appropriations credited to an ac-
count under clause (1) are subject only to such
limitations as are specifically applicable to that
account. Balances of appropriations credited to
an account under clause (2) are subject only to
such limitations as are applicable to the appro-
priations from which they are transferred.
(b) When a function, power, or duty or an ac-
tivity of a department or agency of the Depart-
ment of Defense is transferred to another de-
partment or agency of that department, those
civilian employees of the department or agency
from which the transfer is made that the Sec-
retary of Defense determines are needed to per-
form that function, power, or duty, or for that
activity, as the case may be, may, with the ap-
proval of the President, be transferred to the de-
partment or agency to which that function,
power, duty, or activity, as the case may be, is
transferred. The authorized strength in civilian
employees of a department or agency from
which employees are transferred under this sec-
tion is reduced by the number of employees so
transferred. The authorized strength in civilian
employees of a department or agency to which
employees are transferred under this section is
increased by the number of employees so trans-
ferred.
(Added Pub. L. 87–651, title II, § 201(a), Sept. 7,
1962, 76 Stat. 516; amended Pub. L. 96–513, title V,
§ 511(2), Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 2920.)
HISTORICAL AND REVISION NOTES
Revised
section
Source (U.S. Code)
Source (Statutes at Large)
126(a) ......
126(b) ......
5:172f(a).
5:171n(a) (as applicable to
5:172f(a)).
5:172f (less (a)).
July 26, 1947, ch. 343,
§ 407; added Aug. 10,
1949, ch. 412, § 11 (21st
and 22d pars.), 63 Stat.
589.
July 26, 1947, ch. 343,
§ 308(a) (as applicable
to § 407), 61 Stat. 509.
In subsection (a), the words ‘‘under authority of law’’
are omitted as surplusage. The following substitutions
are made: ‘‘needed’’ for ‘‘necessary’’; ‘‘used’’ for ‘‘be
available for use by’’; and ‘‘those appropriations’’ for
‘‘said funds’’.
In subsection (b), 5 U.S.C. 172f(b) is restated to reflect
more clearly its purpose to authorize ‘‘transfers of per-
sonnel’’ (Senate Report No. 366, 81st Congress, p. 23).
Editorial Notes
AMENDMENTS
1980—Subsec. (b) Pub. L. 96–513 substituted ‘‘Presi-
dent’’ for ‘‘Director of the Bureau of the Budget’’.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1980 AMENDMENT
Amendment by Pub. L. 96–513 effective Dec. 12, 1980,
see section 701(b)(3) of Pub. L. 96–513, set out as a note
under section 101 of this title.
Executive Documents
DELEGATION OF FUNCTIONS
Authority of President under subsec. (a) of this sec-
tion to approve transfers of balances of appropriations
provided for therein delegated to Director of Office of
Management and Budget, see section 9(2) of Ex. Ord.
No. 11609, July 22, 1971, 36 F.R. 13747, set out as a note
under section 301 of Title 3, The President.
§ 127. Emergency and extraordinary expenses
(a) Subject to the limitations of subsection (c),
and within the limitation of appropriations
made for the purpose, the Secretary of Defense,
Cross-references
Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a)** When a function, power, or duty or an activity of a department or agency of the Department of Defense is transferred or assigned to another department or agency of that department, balances of appropriations that the Secretary of Defense determines are available and needed to finance or discharge that function, power, duty, or activity, as the case may be, may, with the approval of the President, be transferred to the department or agency to which that function, power, duty or activity, as the case may be, is transferred, and used for any purpose for which those appropriations were originally available. Balances of appropriations so transferred shall—
(1) be credited to any applicable appropriation account of the receiving department or agency; or
(2) be credited to a new account that may be established on the books of the Department of the Treasury;
and be merged with the funds already credited to that account and accounted for as one fund. Balances of appropriations credited to an account under clause (1) are subject only to such limitations as are specifically applicable to that account. Balances of appropriations credited to an account under clause (2) are subject only to such limitations as are applicable to the appropriations from which they are transferred.
**(b)** When a function, power, or duty or an activity of a department or agency of the Department of Defense is transferred to another department or agency of that department, those civilian employees of the department or agency from which the transfer is made that the Secretary of Defense determines are needed to perform that function, power, or duty, or for that activity, as the case may be, may, with the approval of the President, be transferred to the department or agency to which that function
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 10 U.S.C. § 126
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a) Policies and Procedures.—** The Secretary of Defense shall establish policies and procedures for determining the most appropriate and cost efficient mix of military, civilian, and contractor personnel to perform the mission of the Department of Defense.
**(b) Risk Mitigation Over Cost.—** In establishing the policies and procedures under subsection (a), the Secretary shall clearly provide that attainment of a Department of Defense workforce sufficiently sized and comprised of the appropriate mix of personnel necessary to carry out the mission of the Department and the core mission areas of the armed forces takes precedence over cost. The Secretary may not reduce the civilian workforce programmed full-time equivalent levels, or conduct any reductions or realignments that occur outside the normal programming process (including ad hoc, immediate, or unprogrammed changes) of 50 employees or more implemented before or after the submission of the annual budget request, unless the Secretary conducts an appropriate analysis of the impacts of such reductions on workload, military force structure, lethality, readiness, operational effectiveness, stress on the military force, and fully burdened costs.
**(c) Delegation of Responsibilities.—** The Secretary shall delegate responsibility for implementation of the policies and procedures established under subsection (a) as follows:
(1) The Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness shall have overall responsibility for guidance to implement such policies and procedures.
(2) The Secretaries of the military departments and the heads of the Defense Agencies shall have overall responsibility for the requirements determination, planning, programming, and budgeting for such policies and procedures. The Secretary of Def
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 10 U.S.C. § 129a
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. The source passage cites 10 U.S.C. § 129a. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 158
TITLE 10—ARMED FORCES
§ 129a
Stat. 2658, 2735; Pub. L. 105–85, div. A, title XI,
§ 1101, Nov. 18, 1997, 111 Stat. 1922; Pub. L. 106–65,
div. A, title X, § 1067(1), Oct. 5, 1999, 113 Stat. 774;
Pub. L. 112–81, div. A, title IX, § 932, Dec. 31, 2011,
125 Stat. 1543; Pub. L. 114–328, div. A, title XI,
§ 1101(a), (b)(1), Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2443; Pub.
L. 116–92, div. A, title XI, § 1103, Dec. 20, 2019, 133
Stat. 1596; Pub. L. 117–81, div. A, title XI, § 1102,
Dec. 27, 2021, 135 Stat. 1949.)
Editorial Notes
AMENDMENTS
2021—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 117–81, in first sentence,
substituted ‘‘solely’’ for ‘‘primarily’’ and, in second
sentence, struck out ‘‘solely’’ after ‘‘shall not be sub-
ject’’.
2019—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 116–92, § 1103(1), in first sen-
tence, substituted ‘‘each fiscal year primarily’’ for
‘‘each fiscal year’’, and in second sentence, substituted
‘‘The management of such personnel in any fiscal year
shall not be subject solely to any’’ for ‘‘Any’’ and
struck out ‘‘shall be developed on the basis of those fac-
tors and shall be subject to adjustment solely for rea-
sons of changed circumstances’’ after ‘‘number of em-
ployees’’.
Subsec. (c)(2)(A). Pub. L. 116–92, § 1103(2)(A), inserted
‘‘and associated cost’’ after ‘‘projected size’’.
Subsec. (c)(2)(B). Pub. L. 116–92, § 1103(2), inserted
‘‘and associated cost’’ after ‘‘projected size’’ in two
places and substituted ‘‘to reduce the overall costs of
the total force of military, civilian, and contract
workforces.’’ for ‘‘that have been taken to identify off-
setting reductions and avoid unnecessary overall
growth in the size of the civilian workforce.’’
2016—Pub. L. 114–328, § 1101(b)(1), amended section
catchline generally, substituting ‘‘Civilian personnel
management’’ for
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 10 U.S.C. § 129a
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. The source passage cites 10 U.S.C. § 129a. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a) Establishment.—**
(1) There is a Performance Improvement Officer of the Department of Defense, to be appointed by the Secretary of Defense from among the ranks of qualified individuals from the senior career civil service.
(2) The Performance Improvement Officer shall be appointed from among persons described in paragraph (1) who have an extensive management or business background and experience with managing large or complex organizations, organizational change management, or business transformation activities.
**(b) Deputy.—** The Performance Improvement Officer shall be supported by a Deputy who shall be appointed by the Secretary of Defense from among the ranks of qualified individuals from the senior career civil service. The Deputy shall be the first assistant to the Performance Improvement Officer and shall assist that Officer in the performance of the duties of that position and shall act for, and exercise the powers of, the Officer when that Officer dies, resigns, or is otherwise unable to perform the functions and duties of the office.
**(c) Duties and Responsibilities.—** Subject to the authority, direction, and control of the Secretary of Defense and the Deputy Secretary of Defense, the Performance Improvement Officer shall perform such duties, exercise such powers, and have such responsibilities as the Secretary or the Deputy Secretary may prescribe, including the following:
(1) Responsibility for updating and implementing the Strategic Management Plan of the Department of Defense required by section 904(d) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 10 U.S.C. note prec. 2201).
(2) Responsibility for chairing the Defense Performance Improvement Council (or any successor organization).
(3) Responsibility f
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 10 U.S.C. § 132a
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. The source passage cites 10 U.S.C. § 132a. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 185
TITLE 10—ARMED FORCES
§ 132a
1 So in original. Probably should be capitalized as ‘‘Perform-
ance Improvement Officer’’.
2 So in original. Probably should be ‘‘for’’.
§ 132a. Performance improvement officer 1
(a) ESTABLISHMENT.—
(1) There is a Performance Improvement Of-
ficer of the Department of Defense, to be ap-
pointed by the Secretary of Defense from
among the ranks of qualified individuals from
the senior career civil service.
(2) The Performance Improvement Officer
shall be appointed from among persons de-
scribed in paragraph (1) who have an extensive
management or business background and expe-
rience with managing large or complex organi-
zations, organizational change management,
or business transformation activities.
(b) DEPUTY.—The Performance Improvement
Officer shall be supported by a Deputy who shall
be appointed by the Secretary of Defense from
among the ranks of qualified individuals from
the senior career civil service. The Deputy shall
be the first assistant to the Performance Im-
provement Officer and shall assist that Officer
in the performance of the duties of that position
and shall act for, and exercise the powers of, the
Officer when that Officer dies, resigns, or is oth-
erwise unable to perform the functions and du-
ties of the office.
(c) DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES.—Subject to
the authority, direction, and control of the Sec-
retary of Defense and the Deputy Secretary of
Defense, the Performance Improvement Officer
shall perform such duties, exercise such powers,
and have such responsibilities as the Secretary
or the Deputy Secretary may prescribe, includ-
ing the following:
(1) Responsibility for updating and imple-
menting the Strategic Management Plan of
the Department of Defense required by section
904
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 10 U.S.C. § 132a
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. The source passage cites 10 U.S.C. § 132a. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a) Defense Business Processes Generally.—** The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that defense business processes are reviewed, and as appropriate revised, through business process reengineering to match best commercial practices, to the maximum extent practicable, so as to minimize customization of commercial business systems.
**(b) Defense Business Systems Generally.—** The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that each covered defense business system developed, deployed, and operated by the Department of Defense—
(1) supports efficient business processes that have been reviewed, and as appropriate revised, through business process reengineering;
(2) is integrated into a comprehensive defense business enterprise architecture;
(3) is managed in a manner that provides visibility into, and traceability of, expenditures for the system; and
(4) uses an acquisition and sustainment strategy that prioritizes the use of commercial software and business practices.
**(c) Issuance of Guidance.—**
(1) **Secretary of defense guidance.—** — The Secretary shall issue guidance to provide for the coordination of, and decision making for, the planning, programming, and control of investments in covered defense business systems.
(2) **Supporting guidance.—** — The Secretary shall direct the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment, and the Chief Information Officer of each of the military departments to issue and maintain supporting guidance, as appropriate and within their respective areas of responsibility, for the guidance of the Secretary issued under paragraph (1).
**(d) Guidance Elements.—** The guidance issued under subsection (c) shall include the following elements:
(1) Policy to ensure that
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 10 U.S.C. § 2222
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. The source passage cites 10 U.S.C. § 2222. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 1762
TITLE 10—ARMED FORCES
[§ 2221
days after the date on which such final regulations
are published.’’
PILOT
PROGRAMS
FOR
TESTING
PROGRAM
MANAGER
PERFORMANCE
OF PRODUCT SUPPORT OVERSIGHT RE-
SPONSIBILITIES FOR LIFE CYCLE OF ACQUISITION PRO-
GRAMS
Pub. L. 105–261, div. A, title VIII, § 816, Oct. 17, 1998,
112 Stat. 2088, authorized the Secretary of Defense to
designate 10 acquisition programs of the military de-
partments as pilot programs on program manager re-
sponsibility for product support and required report to
Congress by Feb. 1, 1999.
ENHANCED SYSTEM OF PERFORMANCE INCENTIVES
Pub. L. 103–355, title V, § 5001(b), Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat.
3350, provided that, within one year after Oct. 13, 1994,
the Secretary of Defense should review the incentives
and personnel actions available for encouraging excel-
lence in the management of defense acquisition pro-
grams and provide an enhanced system of incentives,
including pay for performance, to facilitate the
achievement of goals approved or defined pursuant to
subsec. (a) of this section.
RECOMMENDED LEGISLATION
Pub. L. 103–355, title V, § 5001(c), Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat.
3350, directed the Secretary of Defense, not later than
one year after Oct 13, 1994, to submit to Congress any
recommended legislation that the Secretary considered
necessary to carry out this section and otherwise to fa-
cilitate and enhance management of Department of De-
fense acquisition programs on the basis of performance.
[§ 2221. Repealed. Pub. L. 105–261, div. A, title IX,
§ 906(f)(1), Oct. 17, 1998, 112 Stat. 2096]
Section, added Pub. L. 104–106, div. A, title IX,
§ 914(a)(1), Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 412; amended Pub. L.
104–201, div. A, title X, § 1008(a), Sept. 23, 1996, 110 Stat.
2633; Pub. L. 105–85, div.
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 10 U.S.C. § 2222
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. The source passage cites 10 U.S.C. § 2222. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.