Browse Arkansas Code titles and sections
6 U.S.C. § 442 — Litigation management
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 225
TITLE 6—DOMESTIC SECURITY
§ 442
1 So in original. Probably should be ‘‘Sellers’’.
2 So in original. Probably should be ‘‘Government’’.
section 553 of title 5, as may be necessary to
carry out this part.
(Pub. L. 107–296, title VIII, § 862, Nov. 25, 2002, 116
Stat. 2238.)
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
SHORT TITLE
For short title of this part as the ‘‘Support Anti-ter-
rorism by Fostering Effective Technologies Act of 2002’’
or the ‘‘SAFETY Act’’, see section 861 of Pub. L.
107–296, set out as a Short Title note under section 101
of this title.
§ 442. Litigation management
(a) Federal cause of action
(1) In general
There shall exist a Federal cause of action
for claims arising out of, relating to, or result-
ing from an act of terrorism when qualified
anti-terrorism technologies have been de-
ployed in defense against or response or recov-
ery from such act and such claims result or
may result in loss to the Seller. The sub-
stantive law for decision in any such action
shall be derived from the law, including choice
of law principles, of the State in which such
acts of terrorism occurred, unless such law is
inconsistent with or preempted by Federal
law. Such Federal cause of action shall be
brought only for claims for injuries that are
proximately caused by sellers 1 that provide
qualified anti-terrorism technology to Federal
and non-Federal government 2 customers.
(2) Jurisdiction
Such appropriate district court of the
United States shall have original and exclu-
sive jurisdiction over all actions for any claim
for loss of property, personal injury, or death
arising out of, relating to, or resulting from an
act of terrorism when qualified anti-terrorism
technologies have been deployed in defense
against or response or
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 6 U.S.C. § 442
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.
Original supplied file — preserved unchanged
Download original Markdown file
File SHA-256: eeceb869a9bca1f64da3b6dca505eeeea987ad4b72734814d2633aa365216a2a. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.
Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.
Open the recorded source website ↗
Record provenance
Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:usc2024-5e45751cc9058289645dea8d
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code-2024/title-6/section-442-litigation-management--5999593127.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: d5f89d2c3fa732e7999dc35485ca9c9fdcb1ed1987076a27c5f1c899a78bf0a4
Source location: USCODE-2024-title6-chap1-subchapVIII-partG-sec442.pdf
Stored source content
Page 225
TITLE 6—DOMESTIC SECURITY
§ 442
1 So in original. Probably should be ‘‘Sellers’’.
2 So in original. Probably should be ‘‘Government’’.
section 553 of title 5, as may be necessary to
carry out this part.
(Pub. L. 107–296, title VIII, § 862, Nov. 25, 2002, 116
Stat. 2238.)
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
SHORT TITLE
For short title of this part as the ‘‘Support Anti-ter-
rorism by Fostering Effective Technologies Act of 2002’’
or the ‘‘SAFETY Act’’, see section 861 of Pub. L.
107–296, set out as a Short Title note under section 101
of this title.
§ 442. Litigation management
(a) Federal cause of action
(1) In general
There shall exist a Federal cause of action
for claims arising out of, relating to, or result-
ing from an act of terrorism when qualified
anti-terrorism technologies have been de-
ployed in defense against or response or recov-
ery from such act and such claims result or
may result in loss to the Seller. The sub-
stantive law for decision in any such action
shall be derived from the law, including choice
of law principles, of the State in which such
acts of terrorism occurred, unless such law is
inconsistent with or preempted by Federal
law. Such Federal cause of action shall be
brought only for claims for injuries that are
proximately caused by sellers 1 that provide
qualified anti-terrorism technology to Federal
and non-Federal government 2 customers.
(2) Jurisdiction
Such appropriate district court of the
United States shall have original and exclu-
sive jurisdiction over all actions for any claim
for loss of property, personal injury, or death
arising out of, relating to, or resulting from an
act of terrorism when qualified anti-terrorism
technologies have been deployed in defense
against or response or recovery from such act
and such claims result or may result in loss to
the Seller.
(b) Special rules
In an action brought under this section for
damages the following provisions apply:
(1) Punitive damages
No punitive damages intended to punish or
deter, exemplary damages, or other damages
not intended to compensate a plaintiff for ac-
tual losses may be awarded, nor shall any
party be liable for interest prior to the judg-
ment.
(2) Noneconomic damages
(A) In general
Noneconomic damages may be awarded
against a defendant only in an amount di-
rectly proportional to the percentage of re-
sponsibility of such defendant for the harm
to the plaintiff, and no plaintiff may recover
noneconomic damages unless the plaintiff
suffered physical harm.
(B) Definition
For purposes of subparagraph (A), the term
‘‘noneconomic damages’’ means damages for
losses for physical and emotional pain, suf-
fering, inconvenience, physical impairment,
mental anguish, disfigurement, loss of en-
joyment of life, loss of society and compan-
ionship, loss of consortium, hedonic dam-
ages, injury to reputation, and any other
nonpecuniary losses.
(c) Collateral sources
Any recovery by a plaintiff in an action under
this section shall be reduced by the amount of
collateral source compensation, if any, that the
plaintiff has received or is entitled to receive as
a result of such acts of terrorism that result or
may result in loss to the Seller.
(d) Government contractor defense
(1) In general
Should a product liability or other lawsuit
be filed for claims arising out of, relating to,
or resulting from an act of terrorism when
qualified anti-terrorism technologies approved
by the Secretary, as provided in paragraphs (2)
and (3) of this subsection, have been deployed
in defense against or response or recovery
from such act and such claims result or may
result in loss to the Seller, there shall be a re-
buttable presumption that the government
contractor defense applies in such lawsuit.
This presumption shall only be overcome by
evidence showing that the Seller acted fraudu-
lently or with willful misconduct in submit-
ting information to the Secretary during the
course of the Secretary’s consideration of such
technology under this subsection. This pre-
sumption of the government contractor de-
fense shall apply regardless of whether the
claim against the Seller arises from a sale of
the product to Federal Government or non-
Federal Government customers.
(2) Exclusive responsibility
The Secretary will be exclusively respon-
sible for the review and approval of anti-ter-
rorism technology for purposes of establishing
a government contractor defense in any prod-
uct liability lawsuit for claims arising out of,
relating to, or resulting from an act of ter-
rorism when qualified anti-terrorism tech-
nologies approved by the Secretary, as pro-
vided in this paragraph and paragraph (3),
have been deployed in defense against or re-
sponse or recovery from such act and such
claims result or may result in loss to the Sell-
er. Upon the Seller’s submission to the Sec-
retary for approval of anti-terrorism tech-
nology, the Secretary will conduct a com-
prehensive review of the design of such tech-
nology and determine whether it will perform
as intended, conforms to the Seller’s specifica-
tions, and is safe for use as intended. The Sell-
er will conduct safety and hazard analyses on
such technology and will supply the Secretary
with all such information.
(3) Certificate
For anti-terrorism technology reviewed and
approved by the Secretary, the Secretary will
issue a certificate of conformance to the Sell-
Page 226
TITLE 6—DOMESTIC SECURITY
§ 443
1 So in original.
er and place the anti-terrorism technology on
an Approved Product List for Homeland Secu-
rity.
(e) Exclusion
Nothing in this section shall in any way limit
the ability of any person to seek any form of re-
covery from any person, government, or other
entity that—
(1) attempts to commit, knowingly partici-
pates in, aids and abets, or commits any act of
terrorism, or any criminal act related to or re-
sulting from such act of terrorism; or
(2) participates in a conspiracy to commit
any such act of terrorism or any such criminal
act.
(Pub. L. 107–296, title VIII, § 863, Nov. 25, 2002, 116
Stat. 2239.)
§ 443. Risk management
(a) In general
(1) Liability insurance required
Any person or entity that sells or otherwise
provides a qualified anti-terrorism technology
to Federal and non-Federal Government cus-
tomers (‘‘Seller’’) shall obtain liability insur-
ance of such types and in such amounts as
shall be required in accordance with this sec-
tion and certified by the Secretary to satisfy
otherwise
compensable
third-party
claims
arising out of, relating to, or resulting from an
act of terrorism when qualified anti-terrorism
technologies have been deployed in defense
against or response or recovery from such act.
(2) Maximum amount
For the total claims related to 1 such act of
terrorism, the Seller is not required to obtain
liability insurance of more than the maximum
amount of liability insurance reasonably
available from private sources on the world
market at prices and terms that will not un-
reasonably distort the sales price of Seller’s
anti-terrorism technologies.
(3) Scope of coverage
Liability insurance obtained pursuant to
this subsection shall, in addition to the Seller,
protect the following, to the extent of their
potential liability for involvement in the man-
ufacture, qualification, sale, use, or operation
of qualified anti-terrorism technologies de-
ployed in defense against or response or recov-
ery from an act of terrorism:
(A) Contractors, subcontractors, suppliers,
vendors and customers of the Seller.
(B) Contractors, subcontractors, suppliers,
and vendors of the customer.
(4) Third party claims
Such liability insurance under this section
shall provide coverage against third party
claims arising out of, relating to, or resulting
from the sale or use of anti-terrorism tech-
nologies.
(b) Reciprocal waiver of claims
The Seller shall enter into a reciprocal waiver
of claims with its contractors, subcontractors,
suppliers, vendors and customers, and contrac-
tors and subcontractors of the customers, in-
volved in the manufacture, sale, use or oper-
ation of qualified anti-terrorism technologies,
under which each party to the waiver agrees to
be responsible for losses, including business
interruption losses, that it sustains, or for losses
sustained by its own employees resulting from
an activity resulting from an act of terrorism
when qualified anti-terrorism technologies have
been deployed in defense against or response or
recovery from such act.
(c) Extent of liability
Notwithstanding any other provision of law,
liability for all claims against a Seller arising
out of, relating to, or resulting from an act of
terrorism when qualified anti-terrorism tech-
nologies have been deployed in defense against
or response or recovery from such act and such
claims result or may result in loss to the Seller,
whether for compensatory or punitive damages
or for contribution or indemnity, shall not be in
an amount greater than the limits of liability
insurance coverage required to be maintained by
the Seller under this section.
(Pub. L. 107–296, title VIII, § 864, Nov. 25, 2002, 116
Stat. 2240.)
§ 444. Definitions
For purposes of this part, the following defini-
tions apply:
(1) Qualified anti-terrorism technology
For purposes of this part, the term ‘‘quali-
fied anti-terrorism technology’’ means any
product, equipment, service (including support
services), device, or technology (including in-
formation technology) designed, developed,
modified, or procured for the specific purpose
of preventing, detecting, identifying, or deter-
ring acts of terrorism or limiting the harm
such acts might otherwise cause, that is des-
ignated as such by the Secretary.
(2) Act of terrorism
(A) The term ‘‘act of terrorism’’ means any
act that the Secretary determines meets the
requirements under subparagraph (B), as such
requirements are further defined and specified
by the Secretary.
(B) REQUIREMENTS.—An act meets the re-
quirements of this subparagraph if the act—
(i) is unlawful;
(ii) causes harm to a person, property, or
entity, in the United States, or in the case of
a domestic United States air carrier or a
United States-flag vessel (or a vessel based
principally in the United States on which
United States income tax is paid and whose
insurance coverage is subject to regulation
in the United States), in or outside the
United States; and
(iii) uses or attempts to use instrumental-
ities, weapons or other methods designed or
intended to cause mass destruction, injury
or other loss to citizens or institutions of
the United States.
(3) Insurance carrier
The term ‘‘insurance carrier’’ means any
corporation, association, society, order, firm,
company, mutual,1 partnership, individual ag-
Cross-references
Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a) Temporary threshold amounts** For a procurement referred to in [section 422 of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title6-section422&num=0&edition=prelim) that is carried out in support of a humanitarian or peacekeeping operation or a contingency operation, the simplified acquisition threshold definitions shall be applied as if the amount determined under the exception provided for such an operation in those definitions were—
(1) in the case of a contract to be awarded and performed, or purchase to be made, inside the United States, $200,000; or
(2) in the case of a contract to be awarded and performed, or purchase to be made, outside the United States, $300,000.
**(b) Simplified acquisition threshold definitions** In this section, the term “simplified acquisition threshold definitions” means the following:
(1) [Section 134 of title 41](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title41-section134&num=0&edition=prelim).
(2) [Section 153 of title 41](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title41-section153&num=0&edition=prelim).
(3) [Section 3015 of title 10](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title10-section3015&num=0&edition=prelim).
**(c) Small business reserve** For a procurement carried out pursuant to subsection (a), [section 644(j) of title 15](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title15-section644/j&num=0&edition=prelim) shall be applied as if the maximum anticipated value identified therein is equal to the amounts referred to in subsection (a).
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 6 U.S.C. § 442
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.