Browse Arkansas Code titles and sections
10 U.S.C. § 1732 — Untitled legal text
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 1569
TITLE 10—ARMED FORCES
[§ 1732
Corps for the Department of Defense referred to in
[former] section 1731(a) of title 10, United States Code,
is terminated.’’
TENURE AND ACCOUNTABILITY OF PROGRAM MANAGERS
FOR PROGRAM DEFINITION PERIODS
Pub. L. 114–92, div. A, title VIII, § 826, Nov. 25, 2015, 129
Stat. 908, as amended by Pub. L. 114–328, div. A, title
VIII, § 862(a), Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2302; Pub. L. 116–92,
div. A, title IX, § 902(64), Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 1550, pro-
vided that:
‘‘(a) REVISED GUIDANCE REQUIRED.—Not later than 180
days after the date of the enactment of this Act [Nov.
25, 2015], the Secretary of Defense shall revise Depart-
ment of Defense guidance for major defense acquisition
programs to address the tenure and accountability of
program managers for the program definition period of
major defense acquisition programs.
‘‘(b) PROGRAM DEFINITION PERIOD.—For the purposes
of this section, the term ‘program definition period’,
with respect to a major defense acquisition program,
means the period beginning with initiation of the pro-
gram and ending with Milestone B approval (or Key De-
cision Point B approval in the case of a space program).
‘‘(c) RESPONSIBILITIES.—The revised guidance re-
quired by subsection (a) shall provide that the program
manager for the program definition period of a major
defense acquisition program is responsible for—
‘‘(1) bringing technologies to maturity and identi-
fying the manufacturing processes that will be need-
ed to carry out the program;
‘‘(2) ensuring continuing focus during program de-
velopment on meeting stated mission requirements
and other requirements of the Department of De-
fense;
‘‘(3) recommending trade-offs between program
cost, schedule, and performance for the life-cyc
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 10 U.S.C. § 1732
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.
Original supplied file — preserved unchanged
Download original Markdown file
File SHA-256: 2373d2c9689f5b9a222c7536c83199d794ec4d470ffd12b3be1468d5a34716c7. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.
Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.
Open the recorded source website ↗
Record provenance
Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:usc2024-5c6bf2dc275fb488f6e027e9
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code-2024/title-10/section-1732-untitled-legal-text--f5aec5e42b.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: 8b7448803dd9cbff326d6ee800cb300a2e908b62b937551276360ed6b92191e7
Source location: USCODE-2024-title10-subtitleA-partII-chap87-subchapIII-sec1732.pdf
Stored source content
Page 1569
TITLE 10—ARMED FORCES
[§ 1732
Corps for the Department of Defense referred to in
[former] section 1731(a) of title 10, United States Code,
is terminated.’’
TENURE AND ACCOUNTABILITY OF PROGRAM MANAGERS
FOR PROGRAM DEFINITION PERIODS
Pub. L. 114–92, div. A, title VIII, § 826, Nov. 25, 2015, 129
Stat. 908, as amended by Pub. L. 114–328, div. A, title
VIII, § 862(a), Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2302; Pub. L. 116–92,
div. A, title IX, § 902(64), Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 1550, pro-
vided that:
‘‘(a) REVISED GUIDANCE REQUIRED.—Not later than 180
days after the date of the enactment of this Act [Nov.
25, 2015], the Secretary of Defense shall revise Depart-
ment of Defense guidance for major defense acquisition
programs to address the tenure and accountability of
program managers for the program definition period of
major defense acquisition programs.
‘‘(b) PROGRAM DEFINITION PERIOD.—For the purposes
of this section, the term ‘program definition period’,
with respect to a major defense acquisition program,
means the period beginning with initiation of the pro-
gram and ending with Milestone B approval (or Key De-
cision Point B approval in the case of a space program).
‘‘(c) RESPONSIBILITIES.—The revised guidance re-
quired by subsection (a) shall provide that the program
manager for the program definition period of a major
defense acquisition program is responsible for—
‘‘(1) bringing technologies to maturity and identi-
fying the manufacturing processes that will be need-
ed to carry out the program;
‘‘(2) ensuring continuing focus during program de-
velopment on meeting stated mission requirements
and other requirements of the Department of De-
fense;
‘‘(3) recommending trade-offs between program
cost, schedule, and performance for the life-cycle of
the program;
‘‘(4) developing a business case for the program; and
‘‘(5) ensuring that appropriate information is avail-
able to the milestone decision authority to make a
decision on Milestone B approval (or Key Decision
Point B approval in the case of a space program), in-
cluding information necessary to make the certifi-
cation required by section 2366a of title 10, United
States Code [now 10 U.S.C. 4251].
‘‘(d) QUALIFICATIONS, RESOURCES, AND TENURE.—The
Secretary of Defense shall ensure that each program
manager for the program definition period of a major
defense acquisition program—
‘‘(1) has the appropriate management, engineering,
technical, and financial expertise needed to meet the
responsibilities assigned pursuant to subsection (c);
‘‘(2) is provided the resources and support (includ-
ing systems engineering expertise, cost-estimating
expertise, and software development expertise) need-
ed to meet such responsibilities; and
‘‘(3) is assigned to the program manager position
for such program until such time as such program re-
ceives Milestone B approval (or Key Decision Point B
approval in the case of a space program), unless re-
moved for cause or due to exceptional circumstances.
‘‘(e) WAIVER AUTHORITY.—The service acquisition ex-
ecutive, in the case of a major defense acquisition pro-
gram of a military department, or the Under Secretary
of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment, in the case
of a Defense-wide or Defense Agency major defense ac-
quisition program, may waive the requirement in para-
graph (3) of subsection (d) upon a determination that
the program definition period will take so long that it
would not be appropriate for a single individual to
serve as program manager for the entire period covered
by such paragraph.’’
TENURE AND ACCOUNTABILITY OF PROGRAM MANAGERS
FOR PROGRAM EXECUTION PERIODS
Pub. L. 114–92, div. A, title VIII, § 827, Nov. 25, 2015, 129
Stat. 909, as amended by Pub. L. 114–328, div. A, title
VIII, § 862(b), Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2302; Pub. L. 116–92,
div. A, title IX, § 902(65), Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 1550, pro-
vided that:
‘‘(a) REVISED GUIDANCE REQUIRED.—Not later than 180
days after the date of the enactment of this Act [Nov.
25, 2015], the Secretary of Defense shall revise Depart-
ment of Defense guidance for major defense acquisition
programs to address the tenure and accountability of
program managers for the program execution period of
major defense acquisition programs.
‘‘(b) PROGRAM EXECUTION PERIOD.—For purposes of
this section, the term ‘program execution period’, with
respect to a major defense acquisition program, means
the period beginning with Milestone B approval (or Key
Decision Point B approval in the case of a space pro-
gram) and ending with declaration of initial oper-
ational capability.
‘‘(c) RESPONSIBILITIES.—The revised guidance re-
quired by subsection (a) shall—
‘‘(1) require the program manager for the program
execution period of a major defense acquisition pro-
gram to enter into a performance agreement with the
manager’s immediate supervisor for such program
within six months of assignment, that—
‘‘(A) establishes expected parameters for the cost,
schedule, and performance of the program con-
sistent with the business case for the program;
‘‘(B) provides the commitment of the supervisor
to provide the level of funding and resources re-
quired to meet such parameters; and
‘‘(C) provides the assurance of the program man-
ager that such parameters are achievable and that
the program manager will be accountable for meet-
ing such parameters; and
‘‘(2) provide the program manager with the author-
ity to—
‘‘(A) consult on the addition of new program re-
quirements that would be inconsistent with the pa-
rameters established in the performance agreement
entered into pursuant to paragraph (1);
‘‘(B) recommend trade-offs between cost, sched-
ule, and performance, provided that such trade-offs
are consistent with the parameters established in
the performance agreement entered into pursuant
to paragraph (1); and
‘‘(C) develop such interim goals and milestones as
may be required to achieve the parameters estab-
lished in the performance agreement entered into
pursuant to paragraph (1).
‘‘(d) QUALIFICATIONS, RESOURCES, AND TENURE.—The
Secretary shall ensure that each program manager for
the program execution period of a defense acquisition
program—
‘‘(1) has the appropriate management, engineering,
technical, and financial expertise needed to meet the
responsibilities assigned pursuant to subsection (c);
‘‘(2) is provided the resources and support (includ-
ing systems engineering expertise, cost estimating
expertise, and software development expertise) need-
ed to meet such responsibilities; and
‘‘(3) is assigned to the program manager position
for such program during the program execution pe-
riod, unless removed for cause or due to exceptional
circumstances.
‘‘(e) WAIVER AUTHORITY.—The service acquisition ex-
ecutive, in the case of a major defense acquisition pro-
gram of a military department, or the Under Secretary
of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment, in the case
of a Defense-wide or Defense Agency major defense ac-
quisition program, may waive the requirement in para-
graph (3) of subsection (d) upon a determination that
the program execution period will take so long that it
would not be appropriate for a single individual to
serve as program manager for the entire program exe-
cution period.’’
[§ 1732. Repealed. Pub. L. 116–92, div. A, title VIII,
§ 861(j)(5), Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 1519]
Section, added Pub. L. 101–510, div. A, title XII,
§ 1202(a), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1644; amended Pub. L.
Page 1570
TITLE 10—ARMED FORCES
[§ 1733
102–484, div. A, title VIII, § 812(e)(1), Oct. 23, 1992, 106
Stat. 2451; Pub. L. 103–89, § 3(b)(3)(B), Sept. 30, 1993, 107
Stat. 982; Pub. L. 105–261, div. A, title VIII, § 811, Oct. 17,
1998, 112 Stat. 2086; Pub. L. 107–107, div. A, title VIII,
§ 824(b), title X, § 1048(e)(4), Dec. 28, 2001, 115 Stat. 1185,
1227; Pub. L. 108–136, div. A, title VIII, §§ 831(b)(2), (3),
832(b)(2), 833(2), Nov. 24, 2003, 117 Stat. 1549, 1550; Pub. L.
108–375, div. A, title VIII, § 812(a)(1), title X, § 1084(d)(14),
(h)(2), Oct. 28, 2004, 118 Stat. 2013, 2062, 2064; Pub. L.
109–163, div. A, title X, § 1056(c)(3), Jan. 6, 2006, 119 Stat.
3439; Pub. L. 116–92, div. A, title VIII, § 861(b)(2), (j)(4),
Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 1516, 1519, related to selection cri-
teria and procedures for membership in the Acquisition
Corps.
[§ 1733. Renumbered § 1731]
§ 1734. Career development
(a) THREE-YEAR ASSIGNMENT PERIOD.—(1) Ex-
cept as provided under subsection (b) and para-
graph (3), the Secretary of each military depart-
ment, acting through the service acquisition ex-
ecutive for that department, shall provide that
any person who is assigned to a critical acquisi-
tion position shall be assigned to the position
for not fewer than three years. Except as pro-
vided in subsection (d), the Secretary concerned
may not reassign a person from such an assign-
ment before the end of the three-year period.
(2) A person may not be assigned to a critical
acquisition position unless the person executes a
written agreement to remain on active duty (in
the case of a member of the armed forces) or to
remain in Federal service (in the case of an em-
ployee) in that position for at least three years.
The service obligation contained in such a writ-
ten agreement shall remain in effect unless and
until waived by the Secretary concerned under
subsection (b).
(3) The assignment period requirement of the
first sentence of paragraph (1) is waived for any
individual serving as a deputy program manager
if the individual is assigned to a critical acquisi-
tion position upon completion of the individ-
ual’s assignment as a deputy program manager.
(b) ASSIGNMENT PERIOD
FOR PROGRAM MAN-
AGERS.—(1) The Secretary of Defense shall pre-
scribe in regulations—
(A) a requirement that a program manager
and a deputy program manager (except as pro-
vided in paragraph (3)) of a major defense ac-
quisition program be assigned to the position
at least until completion of the major mile-
stone that occurs closest in time to the date
on which the person has served in the position
for four years; and
(B) a requirement that, to the maximum ex-
tent practicable, a program manager who is
the replacement for a reassigned program
manager arrive at the assignment location be-
fore the reassigned program manager leaves.
Except as provided in subsection (d), the Sec-
retary concerned may not reassign a program
manager or deputy program manager from such
an assignment until after such major milestone
has occurred.
(2) A person may not be assigned to a critical
acquisition position as a program manager or
deputy program manager of a major defense ac-
quisition program unless the person executes a
written agreement to remain on active duty (in
the case of a member of the armed forces) or to
remain in Federal service (in the case of an em-
ployee) in that position at least until comple-
tion of the first major milestone that occurs
closest in time to the date on which the person
has served in the position for four years. The
service obligation contained in such a written
agreement shall remain in effect unless and
until waived by the Secretary concerned under
subsection (d).
(3) The assignment period requirement under
subparagraph (A) of paragraph (1) is waived for
any individual serving as a deputy program
manager if the individual is assigned to a crit-
ical acquisition position upon completion of the
individual’s assignment as a deputy program
manager.
(c) MAJOR MILESTONE REGULATIONS.—(1) The
Secretary of Defense shall issue regulations de-
fining what constitutes major milestones for
purposes of this section. The service acquisition
executive of each military department shall es-
tablish major milestones at the beginning of a
major defense acquisition program consistent
with such regulations and shall use such mile-
stones to determine the assignment period for
program managers and deputy program man-
agers under subsection (b).
(2) The regulations shall require that major
milestones be clearly definable and measurable
events that mark the completion of a significant
phase in a major defense acquisition program
and that such milestones be the same as the
milestones contained in the baseline description
established for the program pursuant to section
4214(a) of this title. The Secretary shall require
that the major milestones as defined in the reg-
ulations be included in the Selected Acquisition
Report required for such program under section
4351 of this title.
(d) WAIVER OF ASSIGNMENT PERIOD.—(1) With
respect to a person assigned to a critical acqui-
sition position, the Secretary concerned may
waive the prohibition on reassignment of that
person (in subsection (a)(1) or (b)(1)) and the
service obligation in an agreement executed by
that person (under subsection (a)(2) or (b)(2)),
but only in exceptional circumstances in which
a waiver is necessary for reasons permitted in
regulations prescribed by the Secretary of De-
fense.
(2) With respect to each waiver granted under
this subsection, the service acquisition execu-
tive (or his delegate) shall set forth in a written
document the rationale for the decision to grant
the waiver.
(e) ROTATION POLICY.—(1) The Secretary of De-
fense shall establish a policy encouraging the
rotation of members of the acquisition work-
force serving in critical acquisition positions to
new assignments after completion of five years
of service in such positions, or, in the case of a
program manager, after completion of a major
program milestone, whichever is longer. Such
rotation policy shall be designed to ensure op-
portunities for career broadening assignments
and an infusion of new ideas into critical acqui-
sition positions.
(2) The Secretary of Defense shall establish a
procedure under which the assignment of each
person assigned to a critical acquisition position
shall be reviewed on a case-by-case basis for the
Cross-references
Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a) In General.—** A portfolio acquisition executive is the senior acquisition official designated by the component acquisition executive or the service acquisition executive of the military department concerned, as applicable, to lead a portfolio of capabilities, with authority for plans, budgets, and execution of programs assigned to the portfolio, including life-cycle management.
**(b) Reporting Relationships.—** To ensure streamlined accountability for management, the following relationships shall apply:
(1) Each program manager (as defined in [section 1737 of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title10-section1737&num=0&edition=prelim)) for a defense acquisition program shall report directly to the portfolio acquisition executive for such program unless otherwise directed by the component acquisition executive or service acquisition executive of the military department concerned (as applicable).
(2) Each portfolio acquisition executive shall report directly to the component acquisition executive or the service acquisition executive of the military department concerned (as applicable).
(3) The component acquisition executive or service acquisition executive of the military department concerned (as applicable) shall oversee the designation of, performance of, and resource allocation for all portfolio acquisition executives.
**(c) Responsibilities.—** For the defense acquisition programs assigned to a portfolio acquisition executive, such portfolio acquisition executive shall—
(1) ensure that activities carried out under such programs are aligned with, and are conducted in a manner that supports, the objectives of the defense acquisition system established pursuant to [section 3102 of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/vi
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 10 U.S.C. § 1732
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a) Responsibilities.—** Before granting Milestone A approval for a major defense acquisition program or a major subprogram, the milestone decision authority for the program or subprogram shall ensure that—
(1) information about the program or subprogram is sufficient to warrant entry of the program or subprogram into the risk reduction phase;
(2) the cost, schedule, technical feasibility, and performance trade-offs that have been made with regard to the program do not overly constrain future trade space; and
(3) there are sound plans for progression of the program or subprogram to the development phase.
**(b) Factors to Be Considered for Milestone a Approval.—** A major defense acquisition program or subprogram may not receive Milestone A approval or otherwise be initiated prior to Milestone B approval until the milestone decision authority confirms that the following factors were considered in the decision to grant Milestone A approval:
(1) The program or subprogram fulfills an approved requirements document.
(2) The program or subprogram has conducted appropriate market research.
(3) With respect to any identified areas of risk, there is a plan to reduce the risk.
(4) Planning for sustainment has been addressed.
(5) An analysis of alternatives has been performed consistent with study guidance developed by the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation, or in lieu of an analysis of alternatives, early experimentation with a combatant commander has been conducted.
(6) A life cycle cost estimate for the program or subprogram has been submitted by the component and that the level of resources required to complete the technology maturation and risk reduction phase of the program is sufficient for successful program execution.
(7) The program or subpro
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 10 U.S.C. § 4251
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. The source passage cites 10 U.S.C. § 4251. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 2716
TITLE 10—ARMED FORCES
§ 4251
major weapon system, or sustainment of a
major weapon system, negotiates a price for
technical data to be delivered under a contract
for
such
development,
production,
or
sustainment.
(Added Pub. L. 115–91, div. A, title VIII,
§ 835(a)(1), Dec. 12, 2017, 131 Stat. 1471, § 2439;
amended Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, § 867,
Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1901; renumbered § 4236,
Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title XVIII, § 1847(c)(3),
Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4254.)
Editorial Notes
AMENDMENTS
2021—Pub. L. 116–283 renumbered section 2439 of this
title as this section.
2018—Pub.
L.
115–232,
§ 867(4),
substituted
‘‘, production, or sustainment’’ for ‘‘or production’’ in
section catchline.
Pub. L. 115–232, § 867(1)–(3), inserted ‘‘, to the max-
imum extent practicable,’’ after ‘‘shall ensure’’ and
substituted ‘‘production of a major weapon system, or
sustainment of a major weapon system’’ for ‘‘or for the
production
of
a
major
weapon
system’’
and
‘‘, production, or sustainment’’ for ‘‘or production’’.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 2021 AMENDMENT
Amendment by Pub. L. 116–283 effective Jan. 1, 2022,
with additional provisions for delayed implementation
and applicability of existing law, see section 1801(d) of
Pub. L. 116–283, set out as a note preceding section 3001
of this title.
EFFECTIVE DATE
Pub. L. 115–91, div. A, title VIII, § 835(a)(3), Dec. 12,
2017, 131 Stat. 1471, provided that: ‘‘Section 2439 of title
10, United States Code [now 10 U.S.C. 4236], as added by
paragraph (1), shall apply with respect to any contract
for engineering and manufacturing development of a
major weapon system, or for the production of a major
weapon system, for which the contract solic
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 10 U.S.C. § 4251
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. The source passage cites 10 U.S.C. § 4251. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.