Browse Arkansas Code titles and sections
28 U.S.C. § 1929 — Extraordinary expenses not expressly au-
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 490
TITLE 28—JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE
§ 1928
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 957; Pub. L. 96–349,
§ 3, Sept. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 1156.)
HISTORICAL AND REVISION NOTES
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., § 829 (R.S. § 982).
Word ‘‘personally’’ was inserted upon authority of
Motion Picture Patents Co. v. Steiner et al., 1912, 201 F. 63,
119 C.C.A. 401. Reference to ‘‘proctor’’ was omitted as
covered by the revised section.
See definition of ‘‘court of the United States’’ in sec-
tion 451 of this title.
Changes were made in phraseology.
Editorial Notes
AMENDMENTS
1980—Pub. L. 96–349 substituted judicial authorization
to require attorneys to satisfy excess costs, expenses,
and attorneys’ fees reasonably incurred because of mul-
tiplication of proceedings for such prior authority to
impose liability for increased costs based on mul-
tiplication of proceedings.
§ 1928. Patent infringement action; disclaimer
not filed
Whenever a judgment is rendered for the
plaintiff in any patent infringement action in-
volving a part of a patent and it appears that
the patentee, in his specifications, claimed to
be, but was not, the original and first inventor
or discoverer of any material or substantial part
of the thing patented, no costs shall be included
in such judgment, unless the proper disclaimer
has been filed in the United States Patent and
Trademark Office prior to the commencement of
the action.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 957; Pub. L.
106–113, div. B, § 1000(a)(9) [title IV, § 4732(b)(17)],
Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1536, 1501A–585.)
HISTORICAL AND REVISION NOTES
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., § 821 (R.S. § 973).
Word ‘‘action’’ was substituted for ‘‘any suit at law
or in equity’’ to conform with Rule 2 of the Federal
Ru
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 28 U.S.C. § 1929
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.
Original supplied file — preserved unchanged
Download original Markdown file
File SHA-256: a7b56ed2714ed7c70733bcdd17c56bcb59f923c36f9c561405badd154f70703d. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.
Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.
Open the recorded source website ↗
Record provenance
Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:usc2024-5799e2dbf08daedf4960021b
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code-2024/title-28/section-1929-extraordinary-expenses-not-expressly-au--bae8af4fa6.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: 8743830b80df49ec21405260a52a764210d14eb779d88306dfe8ab7b221dedda
Source location: USCODE-2024-title28-partV-chap123-sec1929.pdf
Stored source content
Page 490
TITLE 28—JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE
§ 1928
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 957; Pub. L. 96–349,
§ 3, Sept. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 1156.)
HISTORICAL AND REVISION NOTES
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., § 829 (R.S. § 982).
Word ‘‘personally’’ was inserted upon authority of
Motion Picture Patents Co. v. Steiner et al., 1912, 201 F. 63,
119 C.C.A. 401. Reference to ‘‘proctor’’ was omitted as
covered by the revised section.
See definition of ‘‘court of the United States’’ in sec-
tion 451 of this title.
Changes were made in phraseology.
Editorial Notes
AMENDMENTS
1980—Pub. L. 96–349 substituted judicial authorization
to require attorneys to satisfy excess costs, expenses,
and attorneys’ fees reasonably incurred because of mul-
tiplication of proceedings for such prior authority to
impose liability for increased costs based on mul-
tiplication of proceedings.
§ 1928. Patent infringement action; disclaimer
not filed
Whenever a judgment is rendered for the
plaintiff in any patent infringement action in-
volving a part of a patent and it appears that
the patentee, in his specifications, claimed to
be, but was not, the original and first inventor
or discoverer of any material or substantial part
of the thing patented, no costs shall be included
in such judgment, unless the proper disclaimer
has been filed in the United States Patent and
Trademark Office prior to the commencement of
the action.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 957; Pub. L.
106–113, div. B, § 1000(a)(9) [title IV, § 4732(b)(17)],
Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1536, 1501A–585.)
HISTORICAL AND REVISION NOTES
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., § 821 (R.S. § 973).
Word ‘‘action’’ was substituted for ‘‘any suit at law
or in equity’’ to conform with Rule 2 of the Federal
Rules of Civil Procedure.
Words ‘‘or decree’’ were omitted after ‘‘judgment,’’
because a judgment under Rule 54(a) of the Federal
Rules of Civil Procedure by definition includes a de-
cree.
Changes were made in phraseology.
Editorial Notes
AMENDMENTS
1999—Pub. L. 106–113 substituted ‘‘United States Pat-
ent and Trademark Office’’ for ‘‘Patent Office’’.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1999 AMENDMENT
Amendment by Pub. L. 106–113 effective 4 months
after Nov. 29, 1999, see section 1000(a)(9) [title IV, § 4731]
of Pub. L. 106–113, set out as a note under section 1 of
Title 35, Patents.
§ 1929. Extraordinary expenses not expressly au-
thorized
Where the ministerial officers of the United
States incur extraordinary expense in executing
Acts of Congress, the payment of which is not
specifically provided for, the Attorney General
may allow the payment thereof.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 957.)
HISTORICAL AND REVISION NOTES
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., § 577 (R.S. § 846; Feb.
18, 1875, ch. 80, § 1, Stat. 318; May 28, 1896, ch. 252, § 13,
29 Stat. 183; May 27, 1908, ch. 200, § 1, 35 Stat. 375; Mar.
3, 1911, ch. 231, § 291, 36 Stat. 1167; Feb. 26, 1919, ch. 49,
§ 7, 40 Stat. 1182; Oct. 13, 1941, ch. 431, § 1, 55 Stat. 736).
Provision for payment of expenses under section 577
of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., from appropriations for ex-
penses of the judiciary was omitted as unnecessary.
Such expenses are carried in the Judiciary Appropria-
tion Acts and will continue without this provision.
The first sentence of said section 577 is incorporated
in section 551 of this title.
The qualifying phrase ‘‘under the special taxation of
the district court in which the said services have been
or shall be rendered, to be paid from the appropriation
for defraying the expenses of the Judiciary,’’ was omit-
ted, and the functions of allowing extraordinary ex-
penses was vested in the Attorney General instead of
the President. Neither the President nor the district
judge should be burdened with such duty since the At-
torney General only has the information upon which to
act.
Changes were made in phraseology.
§ 1930. Bankruptcy fees
(a) The parties commencing a case under title
11 shall pay to the clerk of the district court or
the clerk of the bankruptcy court, if one has
been certified pursuant to section 156(b) of this
title, the following filing fees:
(1) For a case commenced under—
(A) chapter 7 of title 11, $245, and
(B) chapter 13 of title 11, $235.
(2) For a case commenced under chapter 9 of
title 11, equal to the fee specified in paragraph
(3) for filing a case under chapter 11 of title 11.
The amount by which the fee payable under
this paragraph exceeds $300 shall be deposited
in the fund established under section 1931 of
this title.
(3) For a case commenced under chapter 11
of title 11 that does not concern a railroad, as
defined in section 101 of title 11, $1,167.
(4) For a case commenced under chapter 11
of title 11 concerning a railroad, as so defined,
$1,000.
(5) For a case commenced under chapter 12
of title 11, $200.
(6)(A) Except as provided in subparagraph
(B), in addition to the filing fee paid to the
clerk, a quarterly fee shall be paid to the
United States trustee, for deposit in the Treas-
ury, in each case under chapter 11 of title 11,
other than under subchapter V, for each quar-
ter (including any fraction thereof) until the
case is converted or dismissed, whichever oc-
curs first. The fee shall be $325 for each quar-
ter in which disbursements total less than
$15,000; $650 for each quarter in which disburse-
ments total $15,000 or more but less than
$75,000; $975 for each quarter in which disburse-
ments total $75,000 or more but less than
$150,000; $1,625 for each quarter in which dis-
bursements total $150,000 or more but less than
$225,000; $1,950 for each quarter in which dis-
bursements total $225,000 or more but less than
$300,000; $4,875 for each quarter in which dis-
bursements total $300,000 or more but less than
$1,000,000; $6,500 for each quarter in which dis-
bursements total $1,000,000 or more but less
than $2,000,000; $9,750 for each quarter in which
Cross-references
Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Where the ministerial officers of the United States incur extraordinary expense in executing Acts of Congress, the payment of which is not specifically provided for, the Attorney General may allow the payment thereof.
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 28 U.S.C. § 1929
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.