Arkansas Legal Resource Navigator

28 U.S.C. § 1498 — Patent and copyright cases

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

28 U.S.C. § 1498 — Patent and copyright cases

Page 411 TITLE 28—JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE § 1498 1 So in original. Probably should be ‘‘Notwithstanding’’. 1982—Pub. L. 97–164 substituted ‘‘United States Claims Court’’ for ‘‘Court of Claims’’. Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1992 AMENDMENT Amendment by Pub. L. 102–572 effective Oct. 29, 1992, see section 911 of Pub. L. 102–572, set out as a note under section 171 of this title. EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1982 AMENDMENT Amendment by Pub. L. 97–164 effective Oct. 1, 1982, see section 402 of Pub. L. 97–164, set out as a note under section 171 of this title. § 1496. Disbursing officers’ claims The United States Court of Federal Claims shall have jurisdiction to render judgment upon any claim by a disbursing officer of the United States or by his administrator or executor for relief from responsibility for loss, in line of duty, of Government funds, vouchers, records or other papers in his charge. (June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 941; Pub. L. 97–164, title I, § 133(c)(1), Apr. 2, 1982, 96 Stat. 40; Pub. L. 102–572, title IX, § 902(a)(1), Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4516.) HISTORICAL AND REVISION NOTES Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., § 250(3) (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, § 145, 36 Stat. 1136; June 10, 1921, ch. 18, § 304, 42 Stat. 24). Words ‘‘paymaster, quartermaster, commissary of subsistence, or other,’’ preceding ‘‘disbursing officer of the United States,’’ were omitted. See Henderson v. United States, 1907, 42 Ct.Cl. 449 and Hobbs v. United States, 1881, 17 Ct.Cl. 189, holding that the term ‘‘other disbursing officer’’ extends to any disbursing officer of the executive departments of the Government. Words ‘‘by capture or otherwise’’ were omitted as surplusage. Words ‘‘and for which such officer was and is hel

Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 28 U.S.C. § 1498

Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.

Original supplied file — preserved unchanged

Download original Markdown file

File SHA-256: e4d98249fdddf611d794e3834c443a80e60a08498a0df9706188b92551dd56ab. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.

Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.

Open the recorded source website ↗

Record provenance

Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:usc2024-5714b14f403f2409bec83aaa
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code-2024/title-28/section-1498-patent-and-copyright-cases--228afa1ffe.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: 8fd859e4d73f10a97d3cc750715cb28403b3e138239639c14831043485396d6e

Source location: USCODE-2024-title28-partIV-chap91-sec1498.pdf

Stored source content

Page 411 TITLE 28—JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE § 1498 1 So in original. Probably should be ‘‘Notwithstanding’’. 1982—Pub. L. 97–164 substituted ‘‘United States Claims Court’’ for ‘‘Court of Claims’’. Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1992 AMENDMENT Amendment by Pub. L. 102–572 effective Oct. 29, 1992, see section 911 of Pub. L. 102–572, set out as a note under section 171 of this title. EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1982 AMENDMENT Amendment by Pub. L. 97–164 effective Oct. 1, 1982, see section 402 of Pub. L. 97–164, set out as a note under section 171 of this title. § 1496. Disbursing officers’ claims The United States Court of Federal Claims shall have jurisdiction to render judgment upon any claim by a disbursing officer of the United States or by his administrator or executor for relief from responsibility for loss, in line of duty, of Government funds, vouchers, records or other papers in his charge. (June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 941; Pub. L. 97–164, title I, § 133(c)(1), Apr. 2, 1982, 96 Stat. 40; Pub. L. 102–572, title IX, § 902(a)(1), Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4516.) HISTORICAL AND REVISION NOTES Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., § 250(3) (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, § 145, 36 Stat. 1136; June 10, 1921, ch. 18, § 304, 42 Stat. 24). Words ‘‘paymaster, quartermaster, commissary of subsistence, or other,’’ preceding ‘‘disbursing officer of the United States,’’ were omitted. See Henderson v. United States, 1907, 42 Ct.Cl. 449 and Hobbs v. United States, 1881, 17 Ct.Cl. 189, holding that the term ‘‘other disbursing officer’’ extends to any disbursing officer of the executive departments of the Government. Words ‘‘by capture or otherwise’’ were omitted as surplusage. Words ‘‘and for which such officer was and is held re- sponsible,’’ at the end of section 250(3) of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., were omitted as surplusage. Changes were made in phraseology. Editorial Notes AMENDMENTS 1992—Pub. L. 102–572 substituted ‘‘United States Court of Federal Claims’’ for ‘‘United States Claims Court’’. 1982—Pub. L. 97–164 substituted ‘‘United States Claims Court’’ for ‘‘Court of Claims’’. Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1992 AMENDMENT Amendment by Pub. L. 102–572 effective Oct. 29, 1992, see section 911 of Pub. L. 102–572, set out as a note under section 171 of this title. EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1982 AMENDMENT Amendment by Pub. L. 97–164 effective Oct. 1, 1982, see section 402 of Pub. L. 97–164, set out as a note under section 171 of this title. § 1497. Oyster growers’ damages from dredging operations The United States Court of Federal Claims shall have jurisdiction to render judgment upon any claim for damages to oyster growers on pri- vate or leased lands or bottoms arising from dredging operations or use of other machinery and equipment in making river and harbor im- provements authorized by Act of Congress. (June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 941; Pub. L. 97–164, title I, § 133(c), Apr. 2, 1982, 96 Stat. 40; Pub. L. 102–572, title IX, § 902(a)(1), Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4516.) HISTORICAL AND REVISION NOTES Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., § 250a (Aug. 30, 1935, ch. 831, § 13, 49 Stat. 1049; July 13, 1943, ch. 231, 57 Stat. 553). The proviso at the end of section 250a of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., is incorporated in section 2501 of this title. Words ‘‘river and harbor improvements’’ were sub- stituted for ‘‘such improvements’’, in view of Dixon v. U.S., 103 Ct. Cl. 160, holding that words, ‘‘such improve- ments’’ were not limited to the specific improvements listed in the 1935 act, but applied to any river and har- bor improvements. Changes were made in phraseology. Editorial Notes AMENDMENTS 1992—Pub. L. 102–572 substituted ‘‘United States Court of Federal Claims’’ for ‘‘United States Claims Court’’. 1982—Pub. L. 97–164 substituted ‘‘growers’ ’’ for ‘‘growers,’’ in section catchline, and ‘‘United States Claims Court’’ for ‘‘Court of Claims’’ in text. Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1992 AMENDMENT Amendment by Pub. L. 102–572 effective Oct. 29, 1992, see section 911 of Pub. L. 102–572, set out as a note under section 171 of this title. EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1982 AMENDMENT Amendment by Pub. L. 97–164 effective Oct. 1, 1982, see section 402 of Pub. L. 97–164, set out as a note under section 171 of this title. § 1498. Patent and copyright cases (a) Whenever an invention described in and covered by a patent of the United States is used or manufactured by or for the United States without license of the owner thereof or lawful right to use or manufacture the same, the own- er’s remedy shall be by action against the United States in the United States Court of Fed- eral Claims for the recovery of his reasonable and entire compensation for such use and manu- facture. Reasonable and entire compensation shall include the owner’s reasonable costs, in- cluding reasonable fees for expert witnesses and attorneys, in pursuing the action if the owner is an independent inventor, a nonprofit organiza- tion, or an entity that had no more than 500 em- ployees at any time during the 5-year period preceding the use or manufacture of the pat- ented invention by or for the United States. Nothwithstanding 1 the preceding sentences, un- less the action has been pending for more than 10 years from the time of filing to the time that the owner applies for such costs and fees, rea- sonable and entire compensation shall not in- clude such costs and fees if the court finds that the position of the United States was substan- Page 412 TITLE 28—JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE § 1498 tially justified or that special circumstances make an award unjust. For the purposes of this section, the use or manufacture of an invention described in and covered by a patent of the United States by a contractor, a subcontractor, or any person, firm, or corporation for the Government and with the authorization or consent of the Government, shall be construed as use or manufacture for the United States. The court shall not award compensation under this section if the claim is based on the use or manufacture by or for the United States of any article owned, leased, used by, or in the posses- sion of the United States prior to July 1, 1918. A Government employee shall have the right to bring suit against the Government under this section except where he was in a position to order, influence, or induce use of the invention by the Government. This section shall not con- fer a right of action on any patentee or any as- signee of such patentee with respect to any in- vention discovered or invented by a person while in the employment or service of the United States, where the invention was related to the official functions of the employee, in cases in which such functions included research and de- velopment, or in the making of which Govern- ment time, materials or facilities were used. (b) Hereafter, whenever the copyright in any work protected under the copyright laws of the United States shall be infringed by the United States, by a corporation owned or controlled by the United States, or by a contractor, subcon- tractor, or any person, firm, or corporation act- ing for the Government and with the authoriza- tion or consent of the Government, the exclu- sive action which may be brought for such in- fringement shall be an action by the copyright owner against the United States in the Court of Federal Claims for the recovery of his reason- able and entire compensation as damages for such infringement, including the minimum stat- utory damages as set forth in section 504(c) of title 17, United States Code: Provided, That a Government employee shall have a right of ac- tion against the Government under this sub- section except where he was in a position to order, influence, or induce use of the copy- righted work by the Government: Provided, how- ever, That this subsection shall not confer a right of action on any copyright owner or any assignee of such owner with respect to any copy- righted work prepared by a person while in the employment or service of the United States, where the copyrighted work was prepared as a part of the official functions of the employee, or in the preparation of which Government time, material, or facilities were used: And provided further, That before such action against the United States has been instituted the appro- priate corporation owned or controlled by the United States or the head of the appropriate de- partment or agency of the Government, as the case may be, is authorized to enter into an agreement with the copyright owner in full set- tlement and compromise for the damages accru- ing to him by reason of such infringement and to settle the claim administratively out of available appropriations. Except as otherwise provided by law, no recov- ery shall be had for any infringement of a copy- right covered by this subsection committed more than three years prior to the filing of the complaint or counterclaim for infringement in the action, except that the period between the date of receipt of a written claim for compensa- tion by the Department or agency of the Gov- ernment or corporation owned or controlled by the United States, as the case may be, having authority to settle such claim and the date of mailing by the Government of a notice to the claimant that his claim has been denied shall not be counted as a part of the three years, un- less suit is brought before the last-mentioned date. (c) The provisions of this section shall not apply to any claim arising in a foreign country. (d) Hereafter, whenever a plant variety pro- tected by a certificate of plant variety protec- tion under the laws of the United States shall be infringed by the United States, by a corporation owned or controlled by the United States, or by a contractor, subcontractor, or any person, firm, or corporation acting for the Government, and with the authorization and consent of the Gov- ernment, the exclusive remedy of the owner of such certificate shall be by action against the United States in the Court of Federal Claims for the recovery of his reasonable and entire com- pensation as damages for such infringement: Provided, That a Government employee shall have a right of action against the Government under this subsection except where he was in a position to order, influence, or induce use of the protected plant variety by the Government: Pro- vided, however, That this subsection shall not confer a right of action on any certificate owner or any assignee of such owner with respect to any protected plant variety made by a person while in the employment or service of the United States, where such variety was prepared as a part of the official functions of the em- ployee, or in the preparation of which Govern- ment time, material, or facilities were used: And provided further, That before such action against the United States has been instituted, the ap- propriate corporation owned or controlled by the United States or the head of the appropriate agency of the Government, as the case may be, is authorized to enter into an agreement with the certificate owner in full settlement and compromise, for the damages accrued to him by reason of such infringement and to settle the claim administratively out of available appro- priations. (e) Subsections (b) and (c) of this section apply to exclusive rights in mask works under chapter 9 of title 17, and to exclusive rights in designs under chapter 13 of title 17, to the same extent as such subsections apply to copyrights. (June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 941; May 24, 1949, ch. 139, § 87, 63 Stat. 102; Oct. 31, 1951, ch. 655, § 50(c), 65 Stat. 727; July 17, 1952, ch. 930, 66 Stat. 757; Pub. L. 86–726, §§ 1, 4, Sept. 8, 1960, 74 Stat. 855, 856; Pub. L. 91–577, title III, § 143(d), Dec. 24, 1970, 84 Stat. 1559; Pub. L. 94–553, title I, § 105(c), Oct. 19, 1976, 90 Stat. 2599; Pub. L. 97–164, title I, § 133(d), Apr. 2, 1982, 96 Stat. 40; Pub. L. 100–702, title X, § 1020(a)(6), Nov. 19, 1988, 102 Stat. 4671; Pub. L. 102–572, title IX, § 902(a), Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4516; Pub. L. 104–308, § 1(a), Oct. 19, 1996, 110 Stat. 3814; Pub. L. 105–147, § 3, Dec. 16, 1997, 111 Page 413 TITLE 28—JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE § 1499 Stat. 2680; Pub. L. 105–304, title V, § 503(d), Oct. 28, 1998, 112 Stat. 2917.) HISTORICAL AND REVISION NOTES 1948 ACT Based on section 68 of title 35, U.S.C., 1940 ed., Pat- ents (June 25, 1910, ch. 423, 36 Stat. 851; July 1, 1918, ch. 114, 40 Stat. 705). Provisions contained in the second proviso of section 68 of title 35, U.S.C., 1940 ed., relating to right of the United States to any general or special defense avail- able to defendants in patent infringement suits were omitted as unnecessary. In the absence of statutory re- striction, any defense available to a private party is equally available to the United States. Changes in phraseology were made. 1949 ACT This amendment clarifies section 1498 of title 28, U.S.C., by restating its first paragraph to conform more closely with the original law. Editorial Notes REFERENCES IN TEXT Hereafter, referred to in subsec. (b), probably means the date of enactment of Pub. L. 86–726, which was ap- proved on Sept. 8, 1960. The copyright laws of the United States, referred to in subsec. (b), are classified generally to Title 17, Copy- rights. Hereafter, referred to in subsec. (d), probably means after the date of enactment of Pub. L. 91–577, which was approved on Dec. 24, 1970. AMENDMENTS 1998—Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 105–304 inserted ‘‘, and to exclusive rights in designs under chapter 13 of title 17,’’ after ‘‘title 17’’. 1997—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 105–147, § 3, substituted ‘‘ac- tion which may be brought for such infringement shall be an action by the copyright owner’’ for ‘‘remedy of the owner of such copyright shall be by action’’. 1996—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 104–308 inserted at end of first par. ‘‘Reasonable and entire compensation shall include the owner’s reasonable costs, including reason- able fees for expert witnesses and attorneys, in pur- suing the action if the owner is an independent inven- tor, a nonprofit organization, or an entity that had no more than 500 employees at any time during the 5-year period preceding the use or manufacture of the pat- ented invention by or for the United States. Nothwithstanding the preceding sentences, unless the action has been pending for more than 10 years from the time of filing to the time that the owner applies for such costs and fees, reasonable and entire compensa- tion shall not include such costs and fees if the court finds that the position of the United States was sub- stantially justified or that special circumstances make an award unjust.’’ 1992—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 102–572, § 902(a)(1), sub- stituted ‘‘United States Court of Federal Claims’’ for ‘‘United States Claims Court’’. Subsecs. (b), (d). Pub. L. 102–572, § 902(a)(2), sub- stituted ‘‘Court of Federal Claims’’ for ‘‘Claims Court’’. 1988—Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 100–702 added subsec. (e). 1982—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 97–168, § 133(d)(1), sub- stituted ‘‘United States Claims Court’’ for ‘‘Court of Claims’’. Subsecs. (b), (d). Pub. L. 97–164, § 133(d)(2), substituted ‘‘Claims Court’’ for ‘‘Court of Claims’’. 1976—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 94–553 substituted ‘‘section 504(c) of title 17’’ for ‘‘section 101(b) of title 17’’. 1970—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 91–577 added subsec. (d). 1960—Pub. L. 86–726, § 4, substituted ‘‘Patent and copyright cases’’ for ‘‘Patent cases’’ in section catch- line. Pub. L. 86–726, § 1, designated existing provisions as subsec. (a) and added subsecs. (b) and (c). 1952—Act July 17, 1952, allowed Government employ- ees to maintain patent suits against the United States in certain instances. 1951—Act Oct. 31, 1951, inserted second par. 1949—Act May 29, 1949, conformed first par. of section to original law. Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1996 AMENDMENT Pub. L. 104–308, § 1(b), Oct. 19, 1996, 110 Stat. 3814, pro- vided that: ‘‘The amendment made by subsection (a) [amending this section] shall apply to actions under section 1498(a) of title 28, United States Code, that are pending on, or brought on or after, the date of the en- actment of this Act [Oct. 19, 1996].’’ EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1992 AMENDMENT Amendment by Pub. L. 102–572 effective Oct. 29, 1992, see section 911 of Pub. L. 102–572, set out as a note under section 171 of this title. EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1982 AMENDMENT Amendment by Pub. L. 97–164 effective Oct. 1, 1982, see section 402 of Pub. L. 97–164, set out as a note under section 171 of this title. EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1976 AMENDMENT Amendment by Pub. L. 94–553 effective Jan. 1, 1978, see section 102 of Pub. L. 94–553, set out as an Effective Date note preceding section 101 of Title 17, Copyrights. EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1970 AMENDMENT Amendment by Pub. L. 91–577 effective Dec. 24, 1970, see section 141 of Pub. L. 91–577, set out as an Effective Date note under section 2321 of Title 7, Agriculture. WAIVER OF IMMUNITY FOR MEMBERS OF CONGRESS Pub. L. 86–726, § 2, Sept. 8, 1960, 74 Stat. 855, provided that: ‘‘Nothing in this Act [amending this section and section 2386 of Title 10, Armed Forces] shall be con- strued to in any way waive any immunity provided for Members of Congress under article I of section 6 of the Constitution of the United States.’’ § 1499. Liquidated damages withheld from con- tractors under chapter 37 of title 40 The United States Court of Federal Claims shall have jurisdiction to render judgment upon any claim for liquidated damages withheld from a contractor or subcontractor under section 3703 of title 40. (June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 942; Pub. L. 87–581, title II, § 202(a), Aug. 13, 1962, 76 Stat. 360; Pub. L. 97–164, title I, § 133(e)(1), (2)(A), Apr. 2, 1982, 96 Stat. 40, 41; Pub. L. 101–650, title III, § 325(b)(7), Dec. 1, 1990, 104 Stat. 5121; Pub. L. 102–572, title IX, § 902(a)(1), Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4516; Pub. L. 107–217, § 3(g)(3), Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1299; Pub. L. 109–284, § 4(2), Sept. 27, 2006, 120 Stat. 1211.) HISTORICAL AND REVISION NOTES Based on section 324 of title 40, U.S.C., 1940 ed., Public Buildings, Property and Works (June 19, 1912, ch. 174, § 1, 37 Stat. 137). This section contains only the jurisdictional provi- sion in the last clause of section 324 of title 40, U.S.C., 1940 ed. Changes in phraseology were made. Editorial Notes AMENDMENTS 2006—Pub. L. 109–284 substituted ‘‘chapter 37 of title 40’’ for ‘‘Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act’’ in section catchline.

Cross-references

Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

28 U.S.C. § 1498 — Patent and copyright cases

**(a)** Whenever an invention described in and covered by a patent of the United States is used or manufactured by or for the United States without license of the owner thereof or lawful right to use or manufacture the same, the owner’s remedy shall be by action against the United States in the United States Court of Federal Claims for the recovery of his reasonable and entire compensation for such use and manufacture. Reasonable and entire compensation shall include the owner’s reasonable costs, including reasonable fees for expert witnesses and attorneys, in pursuing the action if the owner is an independent inventor, a nonprofit organization, or an entity that had no more than 500 employees at any time during the 5-year period preceding the use or manufacture of the patented invention by or for the United States. Nothwithstanding 11 So in original. Probably should be “Notwithstanding”. the preceding sentences, unless the action has been pending for more than 10 years from the time of filing to the time that the owner applies for such costs and fees, reasonable and entire compensation shall not include such costs and fees if the court finds that the position of the United States was substantially justified or that special circumstances make an award unjust.For the purposes of this section, the use or manufacture of an invention described in and covered by a patent of the United States by a contractor, a subcontractor, or any person, firm, or corporation for the Government and with the authorization or consent of the Government, shall be construed as use or manufacture for the United States. The court shall not award compensation under this section if the claim is based on the use or manufacture by or for the United States of any article owned, leased, used by, or in t

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 28 U.S.C. § 1498

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.