Browse Arkansas Code titles and sections
28 U.S.C. § 1498 — Patent and copyright cases
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 411
TITLE 28—JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE
§ 1498
1 So in original. Probably should be ‘‘Notwithstanding’’.
1982—Pub. L. 97–164 substituted ‘‘United States
Claims Court’’ for ‘‘Court of Claims’’.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1992 AMENDMENT
Amendment by Pub. L. 102–572 effective Oct. 29, 1992,
see section 911 of Pub. L. 102–572, set out as a note
under section 171 of this title.
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1982 AMENDMENT
Amendment by Pub. L. 97–164 effective Oct. 1, 1982,
see section 402 of Pub. L. 97–164, set out as a note under
section 171 of this title.
§ 1496. Disbursing officers’ claims
The United States Court of Federal Claims
shall have jurisdiction to render judgment upon
any claim by a disbursing officer of the United
States or by his administrator or executor for
relief from responsibility for loss, in line of
duty, of Government funds, vouchers, records or
other papers in his charge.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 941; Pub. L. 97–164,
title I, § 133(c)(1), Apr. 2, 1982, 96 Stat. 40; Pub. L.
102–572, title IX, § 902(a)(1), Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat.
4516.)
HISTORICAL AND REVISION NOTES
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., § 250(3) (Mar. 3, 1911,
ch. 231, § 145, 36 Stat. 1136; June 10, 1921, ch. 18, § 304, 42
Stat. 24).
Words ‘‘paymaster, quartermaster, commissary of
subsistence, or other,’’ preceding ‘‘disbursing officer of
the United States,’’ were omitted. See Henderson v.
United States, 1907, 42 Ct.Cl. 449 and Hobbs v. United
States, 1881, 17 Ct.Cl. 189, holding that the term ‘‘other
disbursing officer’’ extends to any disbursing officer of
the executive departments of the Government.
Words ‘‘by capture or otherwise’’ were omitted as
surplusage.
Words ‘‘and for which such officer was and is hel
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 28 U.S.C. § 1498
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.
Original supplied file — preserved unchanged
Download original Markdown file
File SHA-256: e4d98249fdddf611d794e3834c443a80e60a08498a0df9706188b92551dd56ab. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.
Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.
Open the recorded source website ↗
Record provenance
Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:usc2024-5714b14f403f2409bec83aaa
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code-2024/title-28/section-1498-patent-and-copyright-cases--228afa1ffe.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: 8fd859e4d73f10a97d3cc750715cb28403b3e138239639c14831043485396d6e
Source location: USCODE-2024-title28-partIV-chap91-sec1498.pdf
Stored source content
Page 411
TITLE 28—JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE
§ 1498
1 So in original. Probably should be ‘‘Notwithstanding’’.
1982—Pub. L. 97–164 substituted ‘‘United States
Claims Court’’ for ‘‘Court of Claims’’.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1992 AMENDMENT
Amendment by Pub. L. 102–572 effective Oct. 29, 1992,
see section 911 of Pub. L. 102–572, set out as a note
under section 171 of this title.
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1982 AMENDMENT
Amendment by Pub. L. 97–164 effective Oct. 1, 1982,
see section 402 of Pub. L. 97–164, set out as a note under
section 171 of this title.
§ 1496. Disbursing officers’ claims
The United States Court of Federal Claims
shall have jurisdiction to render judgment upon
any claim by a disbursing officer of the United
States or by his administrator or executor for
relief from responsibility for loss, in line of
duty, of Government funds, vouchers, records or
other papers in his charge.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 941; Pub. L. 97–164,
title I, § 133(c)(1), Apr. 2, 1982, 96 Stat. 40; Pub. L.
102–572, title IX, § 902(a)(1), Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat.
4516.)
HISTORICAL AND REVISION NOTES
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., § 250(3) (Mar. 3, 1911,
ch. 231, § 145, 36 Stat. 1136; June 10, 1921, ch. 18, § 304, 42
Stat. 24).
Words ‘‘paymaster, quartermaster, commissary of
subsistence, or other,’’ preceding ‘‘disbursing officer of
the United States,’’ were omitted. See Henderson v.
United States, 1907, 42 Ct.Cl. 449 and Hobbs v. United
States, 1881, 17 Ct.Cl. 189, holding that the term ‘‘other
disbursing officer’’ extends to any disbursing officer of
the executive departments of the Government.
Words ‘‘by capture or otherwise’’ were omitted as
surplusage.
Words ‘‘and for which such officer was and is held re-
sponsible,’’ at the end of section 250(3) of title 28,
U.S.C., 1940 ed., were omitted as surplusage.
Changes were made in phraseology.
Editorial Notes
AMENDMENTS
1992—Pub. L. 102–572 substituted ‘‘United States
Court of Federal Claims’’ for ‘‘United States Claims
Court’’.
1982—Pub. L. 97–164 substituted ‘‘United States
Claims Court’’ for ‘‘Court of Claims’’.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1992 AMENDMENT
Amendment by Pub. L. 102–572 effective Oct. 29, 1992,
see section 911 of Pub. L. 102–572, set out as a note
under section 171 of this title.
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1982 AMENDMENT
Amendment by Pub. L. 97–164 effective Oct. 1, 1982,
see section 402 of Pub. L. 97–164, set out as a note under
section 171 of this title.
§ 1497. Oyster growers’ damages from dredging
operations
The United States Court of Federal Claims
shall have jurisdiction to render judgment upon
any claim for damages to oyster growers on pri-
vate or leased lands or bottoms arising from
dredging operations or use of other machinery
and equipment in making river and harbor im-
provements authorized by Act of Congress.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 941; Pub. L. 97–164,
title I, § 133(c), Apr. 2, 1982, 96 Stat. 40; Pub. L.
102–572, title IX, § 902(a)(1), Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat.
4516.)
HISTORICAL AND REVISION NOTES
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., § 250a (Aug. 30, 1935,
ch. 831, § 13, 49 Stat. 1049; July 13, 1943, ch. 231, 57 Stat.
553).
The proviso at the end of section 250a of title 28,
U.S.C., 1940 ed., is incorporated in section 2501 of this
title.
Words ‘‘river and harbor improvements’’ were sub-
stituted for ‘‘such improvements’’, in view of Dixon v.
U.S., 103 Ct. Cl. 160, holding that words, ‘‘such improve-
ments’’ were not limited to the specific improvements
listed in the 1935 act, but applied to any river and har-
bor improvements.
Changes were made in phraseology.
Editorial Notes
AMENDMENTS
1992—Pub. L. 102–572 substituted ‘‘United States
Court of Federal Claims’’ for ‘‘United States Claims
Court’’.
1982—Pub. L. 97–164 substituted ‘‘growers’ ’’ for
‘‘growers,’’ in section catchline, and ‘‘United States
Claims Court’’ for ‘‘Court of Claims’’ in text.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1992 AMENDMENT
Amendment by Pub. L. 102–572 effective Oct. 29, 1992,
see section 911 of Pub. L. 102–572, set out as a note
under section 171 of this title.
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1982 AMENDMENT
Amendment by Pub. L. 97–164 effective Oct. 1, 1982,
see section 402 of Pub. L. 97–164, set out as a note under
section 171 of this title.
§ 1498. Patent and copyright cases
(a) Whenever an invention described in and
covered by a patent of the United States is used
or manufactured by or for the United States
without license of the owner thereof or lawful
right to use or manufacture the same, the own-
er’s remedy shall be by action against the
United States in the United States Court of Fed-
eral Claims for the recovery of his reasonable
and entire compensation for such use and manu-
facture. Reasonable and entire compensation
shall include the owner’s reasonable costs, in-
cluding reasonable fees for expert witnesses and
attorneys, in pursuing the action if the owner is
an independent inventor, a nonprofit organiza-
tion, or an entity that had no more than 500 em-
ployees at any time during the 5-year period
preceding the use or manufacture of the pat-
ented invention by or for the United States.
Nothwithstanding 1 the preceding sentences, un-
less the action has been pending for more than
10 years from the time of filing to the time that
the owner applies for such costs and fees, rea-
sonable and entire compensation shall not in-
clude such costs and fees if the court finds that
the position of the United States was substan-
Page 412
TITLE 28—JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE
§ 1498
tially justified or that special circumstances
make an award unjust.
For the purposes of this section, the use or
manufacture of an invention described in and
covered by a patent of the United States by a
contractor, a subcontractor, or any person, firm,
or corporation for the Government and with the
authorization or consent of the Government,
shall be construed as use or manufacture for the
United States.
The court shall not award compensation under
this section if the claim is based on the use or
manufacture by or for the United States of any
article owned, leased, used by, or in the posses-
sion of the United States prior to July 1, 1918.
A Government employee shall have the right
to bring suit against the Government under this
section except where he was in a position to
order, influence, or induce use of the invention
by the Government. This section shall not con-
fer a right of action on any patentee or any as-
signee of such patentee with respect to any in-
vention discovered or invented by a person while
in the employment or service of the United
States, where the invention was related to the
official functions of the employee, in cases in
which such functions included research and de-
velopment, or in the making of which Govern-
ment time, materials or facilities were used.
(b) Hereafter, whenever the copyright in any
work protected under the copyright laws of the
United States shall be infringed by the United
States, by a corporation owned or controlled by
the United States, or by a contractor, subcon-
tractor, or any person, firm, or corporation act-
ing for the Government and with the authoriza-
tion or consent of the Government, the exclu-
sive action which may be brought for such in-
fringement shall be an action by the copyright
owner against the United States in the Court of
Federal Claims for the recovery of his reason-
able and entire compensation as damages for
such infringement, including the minimum stat-
utory damages as set forth in section 504(c) of
title 17, United States Code: Provided, That a
Government employee shall have a right of ac-
tion against the Government under this sub-
section except where he was in a position to
order, influence, or induce use of the copy-
righted work by the Government: Provided, how-
ever, That this subsection shall not confer a
right of action on any copyright owner or any
assignee of such owner with respect to any copy-
righted work prepared by a person while in the
employment or service of the United States,
where the copyrighted work was prepared as a
part of the official functions of the employee, or
in the preparation of which Government time,
material, or facilities were used: And provided
further, That before such action against the
United States has been instituted the appro-
priate corporation owned or controlled by the
United States or the head of the appropriate de-
partment or agency of the Government, as the
case may be, is authorized to enter into an
agreement with the copyright owner in full set-
tlement and compromise for the damages accru-
ing to him by reason of such infringement and
to settle the claim administratively out of
available appropriations.
Except as otherwise provided by law, no recov-
ery shall be had for any infringement of a copy-
right covered by this subsection committed
more than three years prior to the filing of the
complaint or counterclaim for infringement in
the action, except that the period between the
date of receipt of a written claim for compensa-
tion by the Department or agency of the Gov-
ernment or corporation owned or controlled by
the United States, as the case may be, having
authority to settle such claim and the date of
mailing by the Government of a notice to the
claimant that his claim has been denied shall
not be counted as a part of the three years, un-
less suit is brought before the last-mentioned
date.
(c) The provisions of this section shall not
apply to any claim arising in a foreign country.
(d) Hereafter, whenever a plant variety pro-
tected by a certificate of plant variety protec-
tion under the laws of the United States shall be
infringed by the United States, by a corporation
owned or controlled by the United States, or by
a contractor, subcontractor, or any person, firm,
or corporation acting for the Government, and
with the authorization and consent of the Gov-
ernment, the exclusive remedy of the owner of
such certificate shall be by action against the
United States in the Court of Federal Claims for
the recovery of his reasonable and entire com-
pensation as damages for such infringement:
Provided, That a Government employee shall
have a right of action against the Government
under this subsection except where he was in a
position to order, influence, or induce use of the
protected plant variety by the Government: Pro-
vided, however, That this subsection shall not
confer a right of action on any certificate owner
or any assignee of such owner with respect to
any protected plant variety made by a person
while in the employment or service of the
United States, where such variety was prepared
as a part of the official functions of the em-
ployee, or in the preparation of which Govern-
ment time, material, or facilities were used: And
provided further, That before such action against
the United States has been instituted, the ap-
propriate corporation owned or controlled by
the United States or the head of the appropriate
agency of the Government, as the case may be,
is authorized to enter into an agreement with
the certificate owner in full settlement and
compromise, for the damages accrued to him by
reason of such infringement and to settle the
claim administratively out of available appro-
priations.
(e) Subsections (b) and (c) of this section apply
to exclusive rights in mask works under chapter
9 of title 17, and to exclusive rights in designs
under chapter 13 of title 17, to the same extent
as such subsections apply to copyrights.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 941; May 24, 1949,
ch. 139, § 87, 63 Stat. 102; Oct. 31, 1951, ch. 655,
§ 50(c), 65 Stat. 727; July 17, 1952, ch. 930, 66 Stat.
757; Pub. L. 86–726, §§ 1, 4, Sept. 8, 1960, 74 Stat.
855, 856; Pub. L. 91–577, title III, § 143(d), Dec. 24,
1970, 84 Stat. 1559; Pub. L. 94–553, title I, § 105(c),
Oct. 19, 1976, 90 Stat. 2599; Pub. L. 97–164, title I,
§ 133(d), Apr. 2, 1982, 96 Stat. 40; Pub. L. 100–702,
title X, § 1020(a)(6), Nov. 19, 1988, 102 Stat. 4671;
Pub. L. 102–572, title IX, § 902(a), Oct. 29, 1992, 106
Stat. 4516; Pub. L. 104–308, § 1(a), Oct. 19, 1996, 110
Stat. 3814; Pub. L. 105–147, § 3, Dec. 16, 1997, 111
Page 413
TITLE 28—JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE
§ 1499
Stat. 2680; Pub. L. 105–304, title V, § 503(d), Oct.
28, 1998, 112 Stat. 2917.)
HISTORICAL AND REVISION NOTES
1948 ACT
Based on section 68 of title 35, U.S.C., 1940 ed., Pat-
ents (June 25, 1910, ch. 423, 36 Stat. 851; July 1, 1918, ch.
114, 40 Stat. 705).
Provisions contained in the second proviso of section
68 of title 35, U.S.C., 1940 ed., relating to right of the
United States to any general or special defense avail-
able to defendants in patent infringement suits were
omitted as unnecessary. In the absence of statutory re-
striction, any defense available to a private party is
equally available to the United States.
Changes in phraseology were made.
1949 ACT
This amendment clarifies section 1498 of title 28,
U.S.C., by restating its first paragraph to conform
more closely with the original law.
Editorial Notes
REFERENCES IN TEXT
Hereafter, referred to in subsec. (b), probably means
the date of enactment of Pub. L. 86–726, which was ap-
proved on Sept. 8, 1960.
The copyright laws of the United States, referred to
in subsec. (b), are classified generally to Title 17, Copy-
rights.
Hereafter, referred to in subsec. (d), probably means
after the date of enactment of Pub. L. 91–577, which was
approved on Dec. 24, 1970.
AMENDMENTS
1998—Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 105–304 inserted ‘‘, and to
exclusive rights in designs under chapter 13 of title 17,’’
after ‘‘title 17’’.
1997—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 105–147, § 3, substituted ‘‘ac-
tion which may be brought for such infringement shall
be an action by the copyright owner’’ for ‘‘remedy of
the owner of such copyright shall be by action’’.
1996—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 104–308 inserted at end of
first par. ‘‘Reasonable and entire compensation shall
include the owner’s reasonable costs, including reason-
able fees for expert witnesses and attorneys, in pur-
suing the action if the owner is an independent inven-
tor, a nonprofit organization, or an entity that had no
more than 500 employees at any time during the 5-year
period preceding the use or manufacture of the pat-
ented
invention
by
or
for
the
United
States.
Nothwithstanding the preceding sentences, unless the
action has been pending for more than 10 years from
the time of filing to the time that the owner applies for
such costs and fees, reasonable and entire compensa-
tion shall not include such costs and fees if the court
finds that the position of the United States was sub-
stantially justified or that special circumstances make
an award unjust.’’
1992—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 102–572, § 902(a)(1), sub-
stituted ‘‘United States Court of Federal Claims’’ for
‘‘United States Claims Court’’.
Subsecs. (b), (d). Pub. L. 102–572, § 902(a)(2), sub-
stituted ‘‘Court of Federal Claims’’ for ‘‘Claims Court’’.
1988—Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 100–702 added subsec. (e).
1982—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 97–168, § 133(d)(1), sub-
stituted ‘‘United States Claims Court’’ for ‘‘Court of
Claims’’.
Subsecs. (b), (d). Pub. L. 97–164, § 133(d)(2), substituted
‘‘Claims Court’’ for ‘‘Court of Claims’’.
1976—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 94–553 substituted ‘‘section
504(c) of title 17’’ for ‘‘section 101(b) of title 17’’.
1970—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 91–577 added subsec. (d).
1960—Pub. L. 86–726, § 4, substituted ‘‘Patent and
copyright cases’’ for ‘‘Patent cases’’ in section catch-
line.
Pub. L. 86–726, § 1, designated existing provisions as
subsec. (a) and added subsecs. (b) and (c).
1952—Act July 17, 1952, allowed Government employ-
ees to maintain patent suits against the United States
in certain instances.
1951—Act Oct. 31, 1951, inserted second par.
1949—Act May 29, 1949, conformed first par. of section
to original law.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1996 AMENDMENT
Pub. L. 104–308, § 1(b), Oct. 19, 1996, 110 Stat. 3814, pro-
vided that: ‘‘The amendment made by subsection (a)
[amending this section] shall apply to actions under
section 1498(a) of title 28, United States Code, that are
pending on, or brought on or after, the date of the en-
actment of this Act [Oct. 19, 1996].’’
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1992 AMENDMENT
Amendment by Pub. L. 102–572 effective Oct. 29, 1992,
see section 911 of Pub. L. 102–572, set out as a note
under section 171 of this title.
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1982 AMENDMENT
Amendment by Pub. L. 97–164 effective Oct. 1, 1982,
see section 402 of Pub. L. 97–164, set out as a note under
section 171 of this title.
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1976 AMENDMENT
Amendment by Pub. L. 94–553 effective Jan. 1, 1978,
see section 102 of Pub. L. 94–553, set out as an Effective
Date note preceding section 101 of Title 17, Copyrights.
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1970 AMENDMENT
Amendment by Pub. L. 91–577 effective Dec. 24, 1970,
see section 141 of Pub. L. 91–577, set out as an Effective
Date note under section 2321 of Title 7, Agriculture.
WAIVER OF IMMUNITY FOR MEMBERS OF CONGRESS
Pub. L. 86–726, § 2, Sept. 8, 1960, 74 Stat. 855, provided
that: ‘‘Nothing in this Act [amending this section and
section 2386 of Title 10, Armed Forces] shall be con-
strued to in any way waive any immunity provided for
Members of Congress under article I of section 6 of the
Constitution of the United States.’’
§ 1499. Liquidated damages withheld from con-
tractors under chapter 37 of title 40
The United States Court of Federal Claims
shall have jurisdiction to render judgment upon
any claim for liquidated damages withheld from
a contractor or subcontractor under section 3703
of title 40.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 942; Pub. L. 87–581,
title II, § 202(a), Aug. 13, 1962, 76 Stat. 360; Pub.
L. 97–164, title I, § 133(e)(1), (2)(A), Apr. 2, 1982, 96
Stat. 40, 41; Pub. L. 101–650, title III, § 325(b)(7),
Dec. 1, 1990, 104 Stat. 5121; Pub. L. 102–572, title
IX, § 902(a)(1), Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4516; Pub. L.
107–217, § 3(g)(3), Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1299; Pub.
L. 109–284, § 4(2), Sept. 27, 2006, 120 Stat. 1211.)
HISTORICAL AND REVISION NOTES
Based on section 324 of title 40, U.S.C., 1940 ed., Public
Buildings, Property and Works (June 19, 1912, ch. 174,
§ 1, 37 Stat. 137).
This section contains only the jurisdictional provi-
sion in the last clause of section 324 of title 40, U.S.C.,
1940 ed.
Changes in phraseology were made.
Editorial Notes
AMENDMENTS
2006—Pub. L. 109–284 substituted ‘‘chapter 37 of title
40’’ for ‘‘Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards
Act’’ in section catchline.
Cross-references
Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a)** Whenever an invention described in and covered by a patent of the United States is used or manufactured by or for the United States without license of the owner thereof or lawful right to use or manufacture the same, the owner’s remedy shall be by action against the United States in the United States Court of Federal Claims for the recovery of his reasonable and entire compensation for such use and manufacture. Reasonable and entire compensation shall include the owner’s reasonable costs, including reasonable fees for expert witnesses and attorneys, in pursuing the action if the owner is an independent inventor, a nonprofit organization, or an entity that had no more than 500 employees at any time during the 5-year period preceding the use or manufacture of the patented invention by or for the United States. Nothwithstanding 11 So in original. Probably should be “Notwithstanding”. the preceding sentences, unless the action has been pending for more than 10 years from the time of filing to the time that the owner applies for such costs and fees, reasonable and entire compensation shall not include such costs and fees if the court finds that the position of the United States was substantially justified or that special circumstances make an award unjust.For the purposes of this section, the use or manufacture of an invention described in and covered by a patent of the United States by a contractor, a subcontractor, or any person, firm, or corporation for the Government and with the authorization or consent of the Government, shall be construed as use or manufacture for the United States. The court shall not award compensation under this section if the claim is based on the use or manufacture by or for the United States of any article owned, leased, used by, or in t
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 28 U.S.C. § 1498
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.