Browse Arkansas Code titles and sections
50 U.S.C. § 4568 — Annual report on impact of offsets
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 1174
TITLE 50—WAR AND NATIONAL DEFENSE
§ 4568
Subsec. (d)(3). Pub. L. 113–172, § 2(4)(E), amended par.
(3) generally. Prior to amendment, par. (3) read as fol-
lows: ‘‘recommendations for legislation, regulations,
executive orders, or other action by the Federal Gov-
ernment necessary to improve the use of the authority
described in paragraph (1); and’’.
Subsec. (d)(4). Pub. L. 113–172, § 2(4)(F), substituted
‘‘the use of the priorities and allocations authorities in
this chapter;’’ for ‘‘all aspects of the authority de-
scribed in paragraph (1).’’
Subsec. (d)(5), (6). Pub. L. 113–172, § 2(4)(G), added pars.
(5) and (6).
2009—Pub. L. 111–67 amended section generally. Prior
to amendment, section related to defense industrial
base information system with regard to its establish-
ment, sources of information, strategic plan for devel-
oping comprehensive system, capabilities, and required
report on subcontractor and supplier base.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
EFFECTIVE DATE
Section deemed to have become effective Mar. 1, 1992,
see section 304 of Pub. L. 102–558, set out as an Effective
Date of 1992 Amendment note under section 4502 of this
title.
Executive Documents
DESIGNATING THE CHAIRPERSON OF THE DEFENSE
PRODUCTION ACT COMMITTEE
Memorandum of President of the United States, May
19, 2010, 75 F.R. 32087, provided:
Memorandum for the Secretary of Defense [and] the
Secretary of Homeland Security
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by section
722(b)(2) of the Defense Production Act of 1950, as
amended (section 11 of Public Law 111–67; 50 App. U.S.C.
2171) [now 50 U.S.C. 4567(b)(2)] (the ‘‘Act’’), I hereby des-
ignate the Secretary of Homeland Security and the
Secretary of Defense as rotating Chairpersons of the
Defense Product
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 50 U.S.C. § 4568
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.
Original supplied file — preserved unchanged
Download original Markdown file
File SHA-256: 1f3112cfe9cc0397c9e4cf24bb63d351c91d588cfdb6a054da4a06ee121e22a1. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.
Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.
Open the recorded source website ↗
Record provenance
Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:usc2024-4918859f1aa8c407e94b3876
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code-2024/title-50/section-4568-annual-report-on-impact-of-offsets--a69de94f3f.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: ff34a779658419853668220da07005a9e7e04bd82302be686bc96f2f74cab996
Source location: USCODE-2024-title50-chap55-subchapIII-sec4568.pdf
Stored source content
Page 1174
TITLE 50—WAR AND NATIONAL DEFENSE
§ 4568
Subsec. (d)(3). Pub. L. 113–172, § 2(4)(E), amended par.
(3) generally. Prior to amendment, par. (3) read as fol-
lows: ‘‘recommendations for legislation, regulations,
executive orders, or other action by the Federal Gov-
ernment necessary to improve the use of the authority
described in paragraph (1); and’’.
Subsec. (d)(4). Pub. L. 113–172, § 2(4)(F), substituted
‘‘the use of the priorities and allocations authorities in
this chapter;’’ for ‘‘all aspects of the authority de-
scribed in paragraph (1).’’
Subsec. (d)(5), (6). Pub. L. 113–172, § 2(4)(G), added pars.
(5) and (6).
2009—Pub. L. 111–67 amended section generally. Prior
to amendment, section related to defense industrial
base information system with regard to its establish-
ment, sources of information, strategic plan for devel-
oping comprehensive system, capabilities, and required
report on subcontractor and supplier base.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
EFFECTIVE DATE
Section deemed to have become effective Mar. 1, 1992,
see section 304 of Pub. L. 102–558, set out as an Effective
Date of 1992 Amendment note under section 4502 of this
title.
Executive Documents
DESIGNATING THE CHAIRPERSON OF THE DEFENSE
PRODUCTION ACT COMMITTEE
Memorandum of President of the United States, May
19, 2010, 75 F.R. 32087, provided:
Memorandum for the Secretary of Defense [and] the
Secretary of Homeland Security
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by section
722(b)(2) of the Defense Production Act of 1950, as
amended (section 11 of Public Law 111–67; 50 App. U.S.C.
2171) [now 50 U.S.C. 4567(b)(2)] (the ‘‘Act’’), I hereby des-
ignate the Secretary of Homeland Security and the
Secretary of Defense as rotating Chairpersons of the
Defense Production Act Committee (the ‘‘Committee’’).
The Chair shall rotate annually on April 1 of each year,
with the Secretary of Homeland Security hereby des-
ignated to serve as Chairperson of the Committee for
the remainder of this first term. The Secretary of
Homeland Security and the Secretary of Defense are di-
rected to formalize responsibilities for funding and ad-
ministratively supporting the Committee through
interagency agreement.
Furthermore, the Chairperson shall invite to each
meeting of the Committee all Members of the Com-
mittee as defined in section 722(b) of the Act [50 U.S.C.
4567(b)], and shall ensure that the reporting require-
ments of section 722(d) of the Act [50 U.S.C. 4567(d)] are
fulfilled.
The Secretary of Homeland Security is hereby au-
thorized and directed to publish this memorandum in
the Federal Register.
BARACK OBAMA.
§ 4568. Annual report on impact of offsets
(a) Report required
(1) In general
The President shall submit to the Com-
mittee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Af-
fairs of the Senate and the Committee on Fi-
nancial Services of the House of Representa-
tives, a detailed annual report on the impact
of offsets on the defense preparedness, indus-
trial competitiveness, employment, and trade
of the United States.
(2) Duties of the Secretary of Commerce
The Secretary of Commerce (hereafter in
this subsection referred to as the ‘‘Secretary’’)
shall—
(A) prepare the report required by para-
graph (1);
(B) consult with the Secretary of Defense,
the Secretary of the Treasury, the Secretary
of State, and the United States Trade Rep-
resentative in connection with the prepara-
tion of such report; and
(C) function as the President’s Executive
Agent for carrying out this section.
(b) Interagency studies and related data
(1) Purpose of report
Each report required under subsection (a)
shall identify the cumulative effects of offset
agreements on—
(A) the full range of domestic defense pro-
ductive capability (with special attention
paid to the firms serving as lower-tier sub-
contractors or suppliers); and
(B) the domestic defense technology base
as a consequence of the technology transfers
associated with such offset agreements.
(2) Use of data
Data developed or compiled by any agency
while conducting any interagency study or
other independent study or analysis shall be
made available to the Secretary to facilitate
the execution of the Secretary’s responsibil-
ities
with
respect
to
trade
offset
and
countertrade policy development.
(c) Notice of offset agreements
(1) In general
If a United States firm enters into a con-
tract for the sale of a weapon system or de-
fense-related item to a foreign country or for-
eign firm and such contract is subject to an
offset agreement exceeding $5,000,000 in value,
such firm shall furnish to the official des-
ignated in the regulations promulgated pursu-
ant to paragraph (2) information concerning
such sale.
(2) Regulations
The information to be furnished under para-
graph (1) shall be prescribed in regulations
promulgated by the Secretary. Such regula-
tions shall provide protection from public dis-
closure for such information, unless public dis-
closure is subsequently specifically authorized
by the firm furnishing the information.
(d) Contents of report
(1) In general
Each report under subsection (a) shall in-
clude—
(A) a net assessment of the elements of the
industrial base and technology base covered
by the report;
(B) recommendations for appropriate re-
medial action under the authority of this
chapter, or other law or regulations;
(C) a summary of the findings and rec-
ommendations of any interagency studies
conducted during the reporting period under
subsection (b);
(D) a summary of offset arrangements con-
cluded during the reporting period for which
information has been furnished pursuant to
subsection (c); and
(E) a summary and analysis of any bilat-
eral and multilateral negotiations relating
Page 1175
TITLE 50—WAR AND NATIONAL DEFENSE
§ 4568
to the use of offsets completed during the re-
porting period.
(2) Alternative findings or recommendations
Each report required under this section shall
include
any
alternative
findings
or
rec-
ommendations offered by any departmental
Secretary, agency head, or the United States
Trade Representative to the Secretary.
(e) Utilization of annual report in negotiations
The findings and recommendations of the re-
ports required by subsection (a), and any inter-
agency reports and analyses shall be considered
by representatives of the United States during
bilateral and multilateral negotiations to mini-
mize the adverse effects of offsets.
(Sept. 8, 1950, ch. 932, title VII, § 723, as added
Pub. L. 111–67, § 12(a), Sept. 30, 2009, 123 Stat.
2020.)
TERMINATION OF SECTION
For termination of section, see section 4564(a)
of this title.
Editorial Notes
REFERENCES IN TEXT
This chapter, referred to in subsec. (d)(1)(B), was in
the original ‘‘this Act’’, meaning act Sept. 8, 1950, ch.
932, 64 Stat. 798, known as the Defense Production Act
of 1950, which is classified principally to this chapter.
For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see
section 4501 of this title and Tables.
CODIFICATION
Section was formerly classified to section 2172 of the
former Appendix to this title prior to editorial reclassi-
fication and renumbering as this section.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
REPORT ON IMPACT OF OFFSETS ON DOMESTIC
CONTRACTORS AND LOWER TIER SUBCONTRACTORS
Pub. L. 108–195, § 7(a), Dec. 19, 2003, 117 Stat. 2894, as
amended by Pub. L. 111–67, § 12(b)(3), Sept. 30, 2009, 123
Stat. 2022, provided that:
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—As part of the annual report re-
quired under section 723(a) of the Defense Production
Act of 1950 [50 U.S.C. 4568(a)], the Secretary of Com-
merce (in this section referred to as the ‘Secretary’)
shall—
‘‘(A) detail the number of foreign contracts involv-
ing domestic contractors that use offsets, industrial
participation agreements, or similar arrangements
during the preceding 5-year period;
‘‘(B) calculate the aggregate, median, and mean
values of the contracts and the offsets, industrial par-
ticipation agreements, and similar arrangements dur-
ing the preceding 5-year period; and
‘‘(C) describe the impact of international or foreign
sales of United States defense products and related
offsets, industrial participation agreements, and
similar arrangements on domestic prime contractors
and, to the extent practicable, the first 3 tiers of do-
mestic contractors and subcontractors during the
preceding 5-year period in terms of domestic employ-
ment, including any job losses, on an annual basis.
‘‘(2) USE OF INTERNAL DOCUMENTS.—To the extent that
the Department of Commerce is already in possession
of relevant data, the Department shall use internal
documents or existing departmental records to carry
out paragraph (1).
‘‘(3) INFORMATION FROM NON-FEDERAL ENTITIES.—
‘‘(A) EXISTING INFORMATION.—In carrying out para-
graph (1), the Secretary shall only require a non-Fed-
eral entity to provide information that is available
through the existing data collection and reporting
systems of that non-Federal entity.
‘‘(B) FORMAT.—The Secretary may require a non-
Federal entity to provide information to the Sec-
retary in the same form that is already provided to
a foreign government in fulfilling an offset arrange-
ment, industrial participation agreement, or similar
arrangement.’’
[Pub. L. 111–67, § 12(b)(3), which directed amendment
of section 7(a) of the ‘‘Defense Production Act Amend-
ments of 2003 (50 U.S.C. App. 2099 note)’’ by striking
‘‘section 309(a) of the Defense Production Act of 1950 (50
U.S.C. App. 2099(a))’’ and inserting ‘‘section 723(a) of
the Defense Production Act of 1950’’, was executed to
section 7(a) of Pub. L. 108–195, the Defense Production
Act Reauthorization of 2003, set out above, to reflect
the probable intent of Congress.]
DEFENSE OFFSETS DISCLOSURE
Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, § 1000(a)(7) [div. B, title XII,
subtitle D], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1536, 1501A–500, pro-
vided that:
‘‘SEC. 1241. SHORT TITLE.
‘‘This subtitle may be cited as the ‘Defense Offsets
Disclosure Act of 1999’.
‘‘SEC. 1242. FINDINGS AND DECLARATION OF POL-
ICY.
‘‘(a) FINDINGS.—Congress makes the following find-
ings:
‘‘(1) A fair business environment is necessary to ad-
vance international trade, economic stability, and
development worldwide, is beneficial for American
workers and businesses, and is in the United States
national interest.
‘‘(2) In some cases, mandated offset requirements
can cause economic distortions in international de-
fense trade and undermine fairness and competitive-
ness, and may cause particular harm to small- and
medium-sized businesses.
‘‘(3) The use of offsets may lead to increasing de-
pendence on foreign suppliers for the production of
United States weapons systems.
‘‘(4) The offset demands required by some pur-
chasing countries, including some close allies of the
United States, equal or exceed the value of the base
contract they are intended to offset, mitigating much
of the potential economic benefit of the exports.
‘‘(5) Offset demands often unduly distort the prices
of defense contracts.
‘‘(6) In some cases, United States contractors are
required to provide indirect offsets which can nega-
tively impact nondefense industrial sectors.
‘‘(7) Unilateral efforts by the United States to pro-
hibit offsets may be impractical in the current era of
globalization and would severely hinder the competi-
tiveness of the United States defense industry in the
global market.
‘‘(8) The development of global standards to manage
and restrict demands for offsets would enhance
United States efforts to mitigate the negative impact
of offsets.
‘‘(b) DECLARATION OF POLICY.—It is the policy of the
United States to monitor the use of offsets in inter-
national defense trade, to promote fairness in such
trade, and to ensure that foreign participation in the
production of United States weapons systems does not
harm the economy of the United States.
‘‘SEC. 1243. DEFINITIONS.
‘‘In this subtitle:
‘‘(1) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES.—The
term ‘appropriate congressional committees’ means—
‘‘(A) the Committee on Foreign Relations of the
Senate; and
‘‘(B) the Committee on International Relations
[now Committee on Foreign Affairs] of the House of
Representatives.
‘‘(2) G–8.—The term ‘G–8’ means the group con-
sisting of France, Germany, Japan, the United King-
Page 1176
TITLE 50—WAR AND NATIONAL DEFENSE
§ 4568
dom, the United States, Canada, Italy, and Russia es-
tablished to facilitate economic cooperation among
the eight major economic powers.
‘‘(3) OFFSET.—The term ‘offset’ means the entire
range of industrial and commercial benefits provided
to foreign governments as an inducement or condi-
tion to purchase military goods or services, including
benefits such as coproduction, licensed production,
subcontracting, technology transfer, in-country pro-
curement, marketing and financial assistance, and
joint ventures.
‘‘(4) TRANSATLANTIC
ECONOMIC
PARTNERSHIP.—The
term ‘Transatlantic Economic Partnership’ means
the joint commitment made by the United States and
the European Union to reinforce their close relation-
ship through an initiative involving the intensifica-
tion and extension of multilateral and bilateral co-
operation and common actions in the areas of trade
and investment.
‘‘(5)
WASSENAAR
ARRANGEMENT.—The
term
‘Wassenaar Arrangement’ means the multilateral ex-
port control regime in which the United States par-
ticipates that seeks to promote transparency and re-
sponsibility with regard to transfers of conventional
armaments and sensitive dual-use items.
‘‘(6) WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION.—The term ‘World
Trade Organization’ means the organization estab-
lished pursuant to the WTO Agreement.
‘‘(7) WTO AGREEMENT.—The term ‘WTO Agreement’
means the Agreement Establishing the World Trade
Organization entered into on April 15, 1994.
‘‘SEC. 1244. SENSE OF CONGRESS.
‘‘It is the sense of Congress that—
‘‘(1) the executive branch should pursue efforts to
address trade fairness by establishing reasonable,
business-friendly standards for the use of offsets in
international business transactions between the
United States and its trading partners and competi-
tors;
‘‘(2) the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of
State, the Secretary of Commerce, and the United
States Trade Representative, or their designees,
should raise with other industrialized nations at
every suitable venue the need for transparency and
reasonable standards to govern the role of offsets in
international defense trade;
‘‘(3) the United States Government should enter
into discussions regarding the establishment of mul-
tilateral standards for the use of offsets in inter-
national defense trade through the appropriate multi-
lateral fora, including such organizations as the
Transatlantic Economic Partnership, the Wassenaar
Arrangement, the G–8, and the World Trade Organiza-
tion; and
‘‘(4) the United States Government, in entering into
the discussions described in paragraph (3), should
take into account the distortions produced by the
provision of other benefits and subsidies, such as ex-
port financing, by various countries to support de-
fense trade.
‘‘SEC. 1245. REPORTING OF OFFSET AGREEMENTS.
‘‘[Amended section 2776 of title 22.]
‘‘SEC. 1246. EXPANDED PROHIBITION ON INCENTIVE
PAYMENTS.
‘‘[Amended section 2779a of title 22.]
‘‘SEC. 1247. ESTABLISHMENT OF REVIEW COMMIS-
SION.
‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—There is established a National
Commission on the Use of Offsets in Defense Trade (in
this section referred to as the ‘Commission’) to address
all aspects of the use of offsets in international defense
trade.
‘‘(b) COMMISSION MEMBERSHIP.—Not later than 120
days after the date of enactment of this Act [Nov. 29,
1999], the President, with the concurrence of the Major-
ity and Minority Leaders of the Senate and the Speak-
er and Minority Leader of the House of Representa-
tives, shall appoint 11 individuals to serve as members
of the Commission. Commission membership shall in-
clude—
‘‘(1) representatives from the private sector, includ-
ing—
‘‘(A) one each from—
‘‘(i) a labor organization,
‘‘(ii) a United States defense manufacturing
company dependent on foreign sales,
‘‘(iii) a United States company dependent on
foreign sales that is not a defense manufacturer,
and
‘‘(iv) a United States company that specializes
in international investment, and
‘‘(B) two members from academia with widely
recognized expertise in international economics;
and
‘‘(2) five members from the executive branch, in-
cluding a member from—
‘‘(A) the Office of Management and Budget,
‘‘(B) the Department of Commerce,
‘‘(C) the Department of Defense,
‘‘(D) the Department of State, and
‘‘(E) the Department of Labor.
The member designated from the Office of Management
and Budget shall serve as Chairperson of the Commis-
sion. The President shall ensure that the Commission
is nonpartisan and that the full range of perspectives
on the subject of offsets in the defense industry is ade-
quately represented.
‘‘(c) DUTIES.—The Commission shall be responsible
for reviewing and reporting on—
‘‘(1) the full range of current practices by foreign
governments in requiring offsets in purchasing agree-
ments and the extent and nature of offsets offered by
United States and foreign defense industry contrac-
tors;
‘‘(2) the impact of the use of offsets on defense sub-
contractors and nondefense industrial sectors af-
fected by indirect offsets; and
‘‘(3) the role of offsets, both direct and indirect, on
domestic industry stability, United States trade com-
petitiveness and national security.
‘‘(d) COMMISSION REPORT.—Not later than 12 months
after the Commission is established, the Commission
shall submit a report to the appropriate congressional
committees. In addition to the items described under
subsection (c), the report shall include—
‘‘(1) an analysis of—
‘‘(A) the collateral impact of offsets on industry
sectors that may be different than those of the con-
tractor providing the offsets, including estimates of
contracts and jobs lost as well as an assessment of
damage to industrial sectors;
‘‘(B) the role of offsets with respect to competi-
tiveness of the United States defense industry in
international trade and the potential damage to the
ability of United States contractors to compete if
offsets were prohibited or limited; and
‘‘(C) the impact on United States national secu-
rity, and upon United States nonproliferation ob-
jectives, of the use of coproduction, subcontracting,
and technology transfer with foreign governments
or companies that results from fulfilling offset re-
quirements, with particular emphasis on the ques-
tion of dependency upon foreign nations for the
supply of critical components or technology;
‘‘(2) proposals for unilateral, bilateral, or multilat-
eral measures aimed at reducing any detrimental ef-
fects of offsets; and
‘‘(3) an identification of the appropriate executive
branch agencies to be responsible for monitoring the
use of offsets in international defense trade.
‘‘(e) PERIOD OF APPOINTMENT; VACANCIES.—Members
shall be appointed for the life of the Commission. Any
vacancy in the Commission shall not affect its powers,
but shall be filled in the same manner as the original
appointment.
‘‘(f) INITIAL MEETING.—Not later than 30 days after
the date on which all members of the Commission have
Page 1177
TITLE 50—WAR AND NATIONAL DEFENSE
§ 4568
been appointed, the Commission shall hold its first
meeting.
‘‘(g) MEETINGS.—The Commission shall meet at the
call of the Chairman.
‘‘(h) COMMISSION PERSONNEL MATTERS.—
‘‘(1) COMPENSATION OF MEMBERS.—Each member of
the Commission who is not an officer or employee of
the Federal Government shall be compensated at a
rate equal to the daily equivalent of the annual rate
of basic pay prescribed for level IV of the Executive
Schedule under section 5315 of title 5, United States
Code, for each day (including travel time) during
which such member is engaged in the performance of
the duties of the Commission. All members of the
Commission who are officers or employees of the
United States shall serve without compensation in
addition to that received for their services as officers
or employees of the United States.
‘‘(2) TRAVEL EXPENSES.—The members of the Com-
mission shall be allowed travel expenses, including
per diem in lieu of subsistence, at rates authorized
for employees of agencies under subchapter I of chap-
ter 57 of title 5, United States Code, while away from
their homes or regular places of business in the per-
formance of services for the Commission.
‘‘(3) STAFF.—
‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The Chairman of the Commis-
sion may, without regard to the civil service laws
and regulations, appoint and terminate an execu-
tive director and such other additional personnel as
may be necessary to enable the Commission to per-
form its duties. The employment of an executive di-
rector shall be subject to confirmation by the Com-
mission.
‘‘(B) COMPENSATION.—The Chairman of the Com-
mission may fix the compensation of the executive
director and other personnel without regard to the
provisions of chapter 51 and subchapter III of chap-
ter 53 of title 5, United States Code, relating to
classification of positions and General Schedule
pay rates, except that the rate of pay for the execu-
tive director and other personnel may not exceed
the rate payable for level V of the Executive Sched-
ule under section 5316 of such title.
‘‘(4) DETAIL OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES.—Any Fed-
eral Government employee may be detailed to the
Commission without reimbursement, and such detail
shall be without interruption or loss of civil service
status or privilege.
‘‘(5) PROCUREMENT OF TEMPORARY AND INTERMITTENT
SERVICES.—The Chairman of the Commission may
procure temporary and intermittent services under
section 3109(b) of title 5, United States Code, at rates
for individuals which do not exceed the daily equiva-
lent of the annual rate of basic pay prescribed for
level V of the Executive Schedule under section 5316
of such title.
‘‘(i) TERMINATION.—The Commission shall terminate
30 days after the transmission of the report from the
President as mandated in section 1248(b).
‘‘SEC. 1248. MULTILATERAL STRATEGY TO AD-
DRESS OFFSETS.
‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—The President shall initiate a re-
view to determine the feasibility of establishing, and
the most effective means of negotiating, a multilateral
treaty on standards for the use of offsets in inter-
national defense trade, with a goal of limiting all offset
transactions that are considered injurious to the econ-
omy of the United States.
‘‘(b) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 90 days after
the date on which the Commission submits the report
required under section 1247(d), the President shall sub-
mit to the appropriate congressional committees a re-
port containing the President’s determination pursuant
to subsection (a), and, if the President determines a
multilateral treaty is feasible or desirable, a strategy
for United States negotiation of such a treaty. One
year after the date the report is submitted under the
preceding sentence, and annually thereafter for 5 years,
the President shall submit to the appropriate congres-
sional committees a report detailing the progress to-
ward reaching such a treaty.
‘‘(c) REQUIRED INFORMATION.—The report required by
subsection (b) shall include—
‘‘(1) a description of the United States efforts to
pursue multilateral negotiations on standards for the
use of offsets in international defense trade;
‘‘(2) an evaluation of existing multilateral fora as
appropriate venues for establishing such negotia-
tions;
‘‘(3) a description on a country-by-country basis of
any United States efforts to engage in negotiations
to establish bilateral treaties or agreements with re-
spect to the use of offsets in international defense
trade; and
‘‘(4) an evaluation on a country-by-country basis of
any foreign government efforts to address the use of
offsets in international defense trade.
‘‘(d) COMPTROLLER
GENERAL
REVIEW.—The Comp-
troller General of the United States shall monitor and
periodically report to Congress on the progress in
reaching a multilateral treaty.’’
DECLARATION OF OFFSET POLICY
Pub. L. 102–558, title I, § 123, Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat.
4206, as amended by Pub. L. 108–195, § 7(c), Dec. 19, 2003,
117 Stat. 2895; Pub. L. 111–67, § 12(b)(1), Sept. 30, 2009, 123
Stat. 2022, provided that:
‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Recognizing that certain offsets
for military exports are economically inefficient and
market distorting, and mindful of the need to minimize
the adverse effects of offsets in military exports while
ensuring that the ability of United States firms to
compete for military export sales is not undermined, it
is the policy of the Congress that—
‘‘(1) no agency of the United States Government
shall encourage, enter directly into, or commit
United States firms to any offset arrangement in con-
nection with the sale of defense goods or services to
foreign governments;
‘‘(2) United States Government funds shall not be
used to finance offsets in security assistance trans-
actions, except in accordance with policies and proce-
dures that were in existence on March 1, 1992;
‘‘(3) nothing in this section shall prevent agencies
of the United States Government from fulfilling obli-
gations incurred through international agreements
entered into before March 1, 1992; and
‘‘(4) the decision whether to engage in offsets, and
the responsibility for negotiating and implementing
offset arrangements, reside with the companies in-
volved.
‘‘(b) PRESIDENTIAL APPROVAL
OF EXCEPTIONS.—It is
the policy of the Congress that the President may ap-
prove an exception to the policy stated in subsection
(a) after receiving the recommendation of the National
Security Council.
‘‘(c) NEGOTIATIONS.—
‘‘(1) INTERAGENCY TEAM.—
‘‘(A) IN
GENERAL.—It is the policy of Congress
that the President shall designate a chairman of an
interagency team comprised of the Secretary of
Commerce, Secretary of Defense, United States
Trade Representative, Secretary of Labor, and Sec-
retary of State to consult with foreign nations on
limiting the adverse effects of offsets in defense
procurement without damaging the economy or the
defense industrial base of the United States or
United States defense production or defense pre-
paredness.
‘‘(B) MEETINGS.—The President shall direct the
interagency team to meet on a quarterly basis.
‘‘(C) REPORTS.—The President shall direct the
interagency team to submit to Congress an annual
report, to be included as part of the report required
under section 723(a) of the Defense Production Act
of 1950 [50 U.S.C. 4568(a)], that describes the results
of the consultations of the interagency team under
subparagraph (A) and the meetings of the inter-
agency team under subparagraph (B).
Page 1178
TITLE 50—WAR AND NATIONAL DEFENSE
§ 4601
‘‘(2) RECOMMENDATIONS
FOR
MODIFICATIONS.—The
interagency team shall submit to the President any
recommendations for modifications of any existing or
proposed memorandum of understanding between of-
ficials acting on behalf of the United States and one
or more foreign countries (or any instrumentality of
a foreign country) relating to—
‘‘(A) research, development, or production of de-
fense equipment; or
‘‘(B) the reciprocal procurement of defense
items.’’
Executive Documents
DELEGATION OF FUNCTIONS
For directive to Secretary of Commerce to prepare
and submit annual report required by this section, see
section 702 of Ex. Ord. No. 13603, Mar. 16, 2012, 77 F.R.
16658, set out as a note under section 4553 of this title.
EX. ORD. NO. 13177. NATIONAL COMMISSION ON THE USE OF
OFFSETS IN DEFENSE TRADE AND PRESIDENT’S COUNCIL
ON THE USE OF OFFSETS IN COMMERCIAL TRADE
Ex. Ord. No. 13177, Dec. 4, 2000, 65 F.R. 76558, as
amended by Ex. Ord. No. 13316, § 3(f), Sept. 17, 2003, 68
F.R. 55256, provided:
By the authority vested in the President by the Con-
stitution and the laws of the United States of America,
including Public Law 106–113 [see Tables for classifica-
tion] and the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as
amended ([former] 5 U.S.C. App.) [see 5 U.S.C. 1001 et
seq.], and in order to implement section 1247 of Public
Law 106–113 (113 Stat. 1501A–502) [set out in a note
above] and to create a parallel ‘‘President’s Council on
the Use of Offsets in Commercial Trade,’’ it is hereby
ordered as follows:
SECTION
1. Membership. Pursuant to Public Law
106–113, the ‘‘National Commission on the Use of Offsets
in Defense Trade’’ (Commission) comprises 11 members
appointed by the President with the concurrence of the
Majority and Minority Leaders of the Senate and the
Speaker and the Minority Leader of the House of Rep-
resentatives. The Commission membership includes: (a)
representatives from the private sector, including one
each from (i) a labor organization, (ii) a United States
defense manufacturing company dependent on foreign
sales, (iii) a United States company dependent on for-
eign sales that is not a defense manufacturer, and (iv)
a United States company that specializes in inter-
national investment; (b) two members from academia
with widely recognized expertise in international eco-
nomics; and (c) five members from the executive
branch, including a member from the: (i) Office of Man-
agement and Budget, (ii) Department of Commerce,
(iii) Department of Defense, (iv) Department of State,
and (v) Department of Labor. The member from the Of-
fice of Management and Budget will serve as Chair-
person of the Commission and will appoint, and fix the
compensation of, the Executive Director of the Com-
mission.
SEC. 2. Duties. The Commission will be responsible for
reviewing and reporting on: (a) current practices by
foreign governments in requiring offsets in purchasing
agreements and the extent and nature of offsets offered
by United States and foreign defense industry contrac-
tors; (b) the impact of the use of offsets on defense sub-
contractors and nondefense industrial sectors affected
by indirect offsets; and (c) the role of offsets, both di-
rect and indirect, on domestic industry stability,
United States trade competitiveness, and national se-
curity.
SEC. 3. Commission Report. Not later than 12 months
after the Commission is established, it will report to
the appropriate congressional committees. In addition
to the items described in section 2 of this order, the re-
port will include: (a) an analysis of (i) the collateral
impact of offsets on industry sectors that may be dif-
ferent than those of the contractor paying offsets, in-
cluding estimates of contracts and jobs lost as well as
an assessment of damage to industrial sectors; (ii) the
role of offsets with respect to competitiveness of the
United States defense industry in international trade
and the potential damage to the ability of United
States contractors to compete if offsets were prohib-
ited or limited; and (iii) the impact on United States
national security, and upon United States nonprolifera-
tion objectives, of the use of co-production, subcon-
tracting, and technology transfer with foreign govern-
ments or companies, that results from fulfilling offset
requirements, with particular emphasis on the question
of dependency upon foreign nations for the supply of
critical components or technology; (b) proposals for
unilateral, bilateral, or multilateral measures aimed at
reducing any detrimental effects of offsets; and (c) an
identification of the appropriate executive branch
agencies to be responsible for monitoring the use of off-
sets in international defense trade.
SEC. 4. Administration, Compensation, and Termination.
(a) The Department of Defense will provide administra-
tive support and funding for the Commission and Fed-
eral Government employees may be detailed to the
Commission without reimbursement.
(b) Members of the Commission who are not officers
or employees of the Federal Government will be com-
pensated at a rate of basic pay prescribed for level IV
of the Executive Schedule under section 5315 of title 5,
United States Code, for each day (including travel
time) during which such member is engaged in perform-
ance of the duties of the Commission. Members of the
Commission who are officers or employees of the Fed-
eral Government will serve without compensation in
addition to that received for their services as officers
or employees of the Federal Government.
(c) Members of the Commission will be allowed travel
expenses, including per diem in lieu of subsistence,
under subchapter 1 of chapter 57 of title 5, United
States Code, while on business in the performance of
services for the Commission.
(d) The Commission will terminate 30 days after
transmitting the report required in section 1248(b) of
Public Law 106–113 (113 Stat. 1501A–505) [set out in a
note above].
[SECS. 5 to 8. Revoked effective Sept. 30, 2003, by Ex.
Ord. No. 13316, § 3(f), Sept. 17, 2003, 68 F.R. 55256.]
CHAPTER 56—EXPORT ADMINISTRATION
Sec.
4601 to 4610. Repealed.
4611.
Multilateral export control violations.
4612.
Missile proliferation control violations.
4613.
Chemical and biological weapons prolifera-
tion sanctions.
4614 to 4623. Repealed.
§ 4601. Repealed. Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title
XVII, § 1766(a), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 2232
Section, Pub. L. 96–72, § 2, Sept. 29, 1979, 93 Stat. 503;
Pub. L. 99–64, title I, § 102, July 12, 1985, 99 Stat. 120;
Pub. L. 103–199, title II, § 201(a), Dec. 17, 1993, 107 Stat.
2320, set forth Congressional findings with respect to
the Export Administration Act of 1979.
Section was formerly classified to section 2401 of the
former Appendix to this title prior to editorial reclassi-
fication and renumbering as this section.
A prior section 2401 of the former Appendix to this
title, Pub. L. 91–184, § 2, Dec. 30, 1969, 83 Stat. 841; Pub.
L. 92–412, title I, § 102, Aug. 29, 1972, 86 Stat. 644; Pub. L.
93–500, § 4(a), Oct. 29, 1974, 88 Stat. 1553, set forth find-
ings of Congress with respect to the Export Adminis-
tration Act of 1969, prior to the expiration of Pub. L.
91–184 on Sept. 30, 1979.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
SHORT TITLE OF 1985 AMENDMENT
Pub. L. 99–64, § 1, July 12, 1985, 99 Stat. 120, provided
that: ‘‘Titles I and II of this Act [enacting sections 4051
Cross-references
Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
In this chapter:
(1) **Administrator.—** — The term “Administrator” means the Administrator of General Services.
(2) **Advisory committee.—**
(A) *In general.—* — The term “advisory committee” means a committee, board, commission, council, conference, panel, task force, or other similar group, or any subcommittee or other subgroup thereof (hereafter in this paragraph referred to as “committee”) that is established or utilized to obtain advice or recommendations for the President or one or more agencies or officers of the Federal Government and that is—
(i) established by statute or reorganization plan;
(ii) established or utilized by the President; or
(iii) established or utilized by one or more agencies.
(B) *Exclusions.—* — The term “advisory committee” excludes—
(i) a committee that is composed wholly of full-time, or permanent part-time, officers or employees of the Federal Government; and
(ii) a committee that is created by the National Academy of Sciences or the National Academy of Public Administration.
(3) **Agency.—** — The term “agency” has the meaning given the term in [section 551 of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title5-section551&num=0&edition=prelim).
(4) **Presidential advisory committee.—** — The term “Presidential advisory committee” means an advisory committee that advises the President.
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 5 U.S.C. § 1001
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. The source passage cites 5 U.S.C. § 1001. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 246
TITLE 5—GOVERNMENT ORGANIZATION AND EMPLOYEES
[§ 913
amendment, or to a motion to postpone, or a
motion to proceed to the consideration of other
business. A motion to reconsider the vote by
which the motion is agreed to or disagreed to
shall not be in order. If a motion to proceed to
the consideration of the resolution is agreed to,
the resolution shall remain the unfinished busi-
ness of the respective House until disposed of.
(b) Debate on the resolution, and on all debat-
able motions and appeals in connection there-
with, shall be limited to not more than ten
hours, which shall be divided equally between
individuals favoring and individuals opposing
the resolution. A motion further to limit debate
is in order and not debatable. An amendment to,
or a motion to postpone, or a motion to proceed
to the consideration of other business, or a mo-
tion to recommit the resolution is not in order.
A motion to reconsider the vote by which the
resolution is passed or rejected shall not be in
order.
(c) Immediately following the conclusion of
the debate on the resolution with respect to a
reorganization plan, and a single quorum call at
the conclusion of the debate if requested in ac-
cordance with the rules of the appropriate
House, the vote on final passage of the resolu-
tion shall occur.
(d) Appeals from the decisions of the Chair re-
lating to the application of the rules of the Sen-
ate or the House of Representatives, as the case
may be, to the procedure relating to a resolu-
tion with respect to a reorganization plan shall
be decided without debate.
(e) If, prior to the passage by one House of a
resolution of that House, that House receives a
resolution with respect to the same reorganiza-
tion plan from the other House, then—
(1) the
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 5 U.S.C. § 1001
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. The source passage cites 5 U.S.C. § 1001. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a) In general** The Director of National Intelligence, in consultation with such other heads of elements of the intelligence community as the Director considers appropriate, shall provide support to and consult with the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, and other Federal agencies as appropriate when reviewing transactions relating to the acquisition of covered entities by foreign entities of concern, including attempts by the Government of the People’s Republic of China—
(1) to leverage and acquire biological data in the United States; and
(2) to leverage and acquire biological data outside the United States, including by providing economic support to the military, industrial, agricultural, or health care infrastructure of foreign countries.
**(b) Briefing** Not later than 90 days after December 18, 2025, the Director of National Intelligence shall brief the appropriate congressional committees on—
(1) a formal process for ensuring intelligence community support to Federal agencies relating to adversary acquisition of biological data, in compliance with Executive Order 14117 ([50 U.S.C. 1701](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title50-section1701&num=0&edition=prelim) note; relating to preventing access to Americans’ bulk sensitive personal data and United States Government-related data by countries of concern), or any successor order; and
(2) any additional resources or authorities needed to provide intelligence community support under subsection (b)(1).
**(c) Definitions** In this section:
(1) **Appropriate congressional committees** — The term “appropriate congressional committees” means—
(A) the congressional intelligence committees;
(B) the congressional defense commi
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 50 U.S.C. § 4567
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. The source passage cites 50 U.S.C. § 4567. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 1172
TITLE 50—WAR AND NATIONAL DEFENSE
§ 4566
the Assistant to the President for National Security
Affairs a report documenting the results of its review.
The report shall also include any resulting policy rec-
ommendations that the Committee considers necessary
to meet the evolving set of national security risks.
SEC. 5. Definitions. For purposes of this order, terms
shall have the same meanings ascribed to them in sec-
tion 721 and regulations promulgated by the Committee
under section 721.
SEC. 6. General Provisions. (a) Nothing in this order
shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:
(i) the authority granted by law to an executive de-
partment or agency, or the head thereof; or
(ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Man-
agement and Budget relating to budgetary, administra-
tive, or legislative proposals.
(b) This order shall be implemented consistent with
applicable law and subject to the availability of appro-
priations.
(c) This order is not intended to, and does not, affect
the requirements in section 721 relating to the scope of
the Committee’s jurisdiction.
(d) This order is not intended to, and does not, create
any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforce-
able at law or in equity by any party against the
United States, its departments, agencies, or entities,
its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.
J.R. BIDEN, JR.
INTERIM DIRECTIVE REGARDING DISPOSITION OF CERTAIN
MERGERS, ACQUISITIONS, AND TAKEOVERS
Memorandum of the President of the United States,
Oct. 26, 1988, 53 F.R. 43999, provided:
Memorandum for the Secretary of the Treasury
By virtue of the authority vested in me by the Con-
stitution and statutes of the United States, including
without limitation Section 301 of Title 3
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 50 U.S.C. § 4567
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. The source passage cites 50 U.S.C. § 4567. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a) In general** No entity controlled by a foreign government may merge with, acquire, or take over a company engaged in interstate commerce in the United States that—
(1) is performing a Department of Defense contract, or a Department of Energy contract under a national security program, that cannot be performed satisfactorily unless that company is given access to information in a proscribed category of information; or
(2) during the previous fiscal year, was awarded—
(A) Department of Defense prime contracts in an aggregate amount in excess of $500,000,000; or
(B) Department of Energy prime contracts under national security programs in an aggregate amount in excess of $500,000,000.
**(b) Inapplicability to certain cases** The limitation in subsection (a) shall not apply if a merger, acquisition, or takeover is not suspended or prohibited pursuant to [section 4565 of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title50-section4565&num=0&edition=prelim).
**(c) Definitions** In this section:
(1) The term “entity controlled by a foreign government” includes—
(A) any domestic or foreign organization or corporation that is effectively owned or controlled by a foreign government; and
(B) any individual acting on behalf of a foreign government,
as determined by the President.
(2) The term “proscribed category of information” means a category of information that—
(A) with respect to Department of Defense contracts—
(i) includes special access information;
(ii) is determined by the Secretary of Defense to include information the disclosure of which to an entity controlled by a foreign government is not in the national security interests of the United States; and
(iii) is defined in regulations prescribed by th
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 50 U.S.C. § 4568
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.