Browse Arkansas Code titles and sections
18 U.S.C. § 3507 — Special master at foreign deposition
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 778
TITLE 18—CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
§ 3505
menced, occurring after the date of its enactment [Oct.
15, 1970]. Paragraph (3) of subsection (a) of section 3504,
chapter 223, title 18, United States Code, shall not
apply to any proceeding in which all information to be
relied upon to establish inadmissibility was possessed
by the party making such claim and adduced in such
proceeding prior to such enactment.’’
§ 3505. Foreign records of regularly conducted
activity
(a)(1) In a criminal proceeding in a court of
the United States, a foreign record of regularly
conducted activity, or a copy of such record,
shall not be excluded as evidence by the hearsay
rule if a foreign certification attests that—
(A) such record was made, at or near the
time of the occurrence of the matters set
forth, by (or from information transmitted by)
a person with knowledge of those matters;
(B) such record was kept in the course of a
regularly conducted business activity;
(C) the business activity made such a record
as a regular practice; and
(D) if such record is not the original, such
record is a duplicate of the original;
unless the source of information or the method
or circumstances of preparation indicate lack of
trustworthiness.
(2) A foreign certification under this section
shall authenticate such record or duplicate.
(b) At the arraignment or as soon after the ar-
raignment as practicable, a party intending to
offer in evidence under this section a foreign
record of regularly conducted activity shall pro-
vide written notice of that intention to each
other party. A motion opposing admission in
evidence of such record shall be made by the op-
posing party and determined by the court before
trial. Failure by a party to file such motion be-
fore tria
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 18 U.S.C. § 3507
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.
Original supplied file — preserved unchanged
Download original Markdown file
File SHA-256: 55f2982d8b69867875b80c1e579b93ba2a059b0e12769b20d7ef4a7c340ee479. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.
Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.
Open the recorded source website ↗
Record provenance
Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:usc2024-414db12bab616bfa9aaf925a
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code-2024/title-18/section-3507-special-master-at-foreign-deposition--95e0bfa22b.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: dcb420a1e651cd173107d1d7ad5220224a731c3f63b7ed816d42106f89f50f67
Source location: USCODE-2024-title18-partII-chap223-sec3507.pdf
Stored source content
Page 778
TITLE 18—CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
§ 3505
menced, occurring after the date of its enactment [Oct.
15, 1970]. Paragraph (3) of subsection (a) of section 3504,
chapter 223, title 18, United States Code, shall not
apply to any proceeding in which all information to be
relied upon to establish inadmissibility was possessed
by the party making such claim and adduced in such
proceeding prior to such enactment.’’
§ 3505. Foreign records of regularly conducted
activity
(a)(1) In a criminal proceeding in a court of
the United States, a foreign record of regularly
conducted activity, or a copy of such record,
shall not be excluded as evidence by the hearsay
rule if a foreign certification attests that—
(A) such record was made, at or near the
time of the occurrence of the matters set
forth, by (or from information transmitted by)
a person with knowledge of those matters;
(B) such record was kept in the course of a
regularly conducted business activity;
(C) the business activity made such a record
as a regular practice; and
(D) if such record is not the original, such
record is a duplicate of the original;
unless the source of information or the method
or circumstances of preparation indicate lack of
trustworthiness.
(2) A foreign certification under this section
shall authenticate such record or duplicate.
(b) At the arraignment or as soon after the ar-
raignment as practicable, a party intending to
offer in evidence under this section a foreign
record of regularly conducted activity shall pro-
vide written notice of that intention to each
other party. A motion opposing admission in
evidence of such record shall be made by the op-
posing party and determined by the court before
trial. Failure by a party to file such motion be-
fore trial shall constitute a waiver of objection
to such record or duplicate, but the court for
cause shown may grant relief from the waiver.
(c) As used in this section, the term—
(1) ‘‘foreign record of regularly conducted
activity’’
means
a
memorandum,
report,
record, or data compilation, in any form, of
acts, events, conditions, opinions, or diag-
noses, maintained in a foreign country;
(2) ‘‘foreign certification’’ means a written
declaration made and signed in a foreign coun-
try by the custodian of a foreign record of reg-
ularly conducted activity or another qualified
person that, if falsely made, would subject the
maker to criminal penalty under the laws of
that country; and
(3) ‘‘business’’ includes business, institution,
association, profession, occupation, and call-
ing of every kind, whether or not conducted
for profit.
(Added Pub. L. 98–473, title II, § 1217(a), Oct. 12,
1984, 98 Stat. 2165.)
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
EFFECTIVE DATE
Pub. L. 98–473, title II, § 1220, Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat.
2167, provided that: ‘‘This part [part K (§§ 1217–1220) of
chapter XII of title II of Pub. L. 98–473, enacting this
section and sections 3292, 3506, and 3507 of this title and
amending section 3161 of this title] and the amend-
ments made by this part shall take effect thirty days
after the date of the enactment of this Act [Oct. 12,
1984].’’
§ 3506. Service of papers filed in opposition to of-
ficial request by United States to foreign gov-
ernment for criminal evidence
(a) Except as provided in subsection (b) of this
section, any national or resident of the United
States who submits, or causes to be submitted,
a pleading or other document to a court or other
authority in a foreign country in opposition to
an official request for evidence of an offense
shall serve such pleading or other document on
the Attorney General at the time such pleading
or other document is submitted.
(b) Any person who is a party to a criminal
proceeding in a court of the United States who
submits, or causes to be submitted, a pleading
or other document to a court or other authority
in a foreign country in opposition to an official
request for evidence of an offense that is a sub-
ject of such proceeding shall serve such pleading
or other document on the appropriate attorney
for the Government, pursuant to the Federal
Rules of Criminal Procedure, at the time such
pleading or other document is submitted.
(c) As used in this section, the term ‘‘official
request’’ means a letter rogatory, a request
under a treaty or convention, or any other re-
quest for evidence made by a court of the United
States or an authority of the United States hav-
ing criminal law enforcement responsibility, to
a court or other authority of a foreign country.
(Added Pub. L. 98–473, title II, § 1217(a), Oct. 12,
1984, 98 Stat. 2166.)
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
EFFECTIVE DATE
Section effective 30 days after Oct. 12, 1984, see sec-
tion 1220 of Pub. L. 98–473, set out as a note under sec-
tion 3505 of this title.
§ 3507. Special master at foreign deposition
Upon application of a party to a criminal case,
a United States district court before which the
case is pending may, to the extent permitted by
a foreign country, appoint a special master to
carry out at a deposition taken in that country
such duties as the court may direct, including
presiding at the deposition or serving as an advi-
sor on questions of United States law. Notwith-
standing any other provision of law, a special
master appointed under this section shall not
decide questions of privilege under foreign law.
The refusal of a court to appoint a special mas-
ter under this section, or of the foreign country
to permit a special master appointed under this
section to carry out a duty at a deposition in
that country, shall not affect the admissibility
in evidence of a deposition taken under the pro-
visions of the Federal Rules of Criminal Proce-
dure.
(Added Pub. L. 98–473, title II, § 1217(a), Oct. 12,
1984, 98 Stat. 2166.)
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
EFFECTIVE DATE
Section effective 30 days after Oct. 12, 1984, see sec-
tion 1220 of Pub. L. 98–473, set out as a note under sec-
tion 3505 of this title.
Page 779
TITLE 18—CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
§ 3509
§ 3508. Custody and return of foreign witnesses
(a) When the testimony of a person who is
serving a sentence, is in pretrial detention, or is
otherwise being held in custody, in a foreign
country, is needed in a State or Federal crimi-
nal proceeding, the Attorney General shall,
when he deems it appropriate in the exercise of
his discretion, have the authority to request the
temporary transfer of that person to the United
States for the purposes of giving such testi-
mony, to transport such person to the United
States in custody, to maintain the custody of
such person while he is in the United States, and
to return such person to the foreign country.
(b) Where the transfer to the United States of
a person in custody for the purposes of giving
testimony is provided for by treaty or conven-
tion, by this section, or both, that person shall
be returned to the foreign country from which
he is transferred. In no event shall the return of
such person require any request for extradition
or extradition proceedings, or proceedings under
the immigration laws.
(c) Where there is a treaty or convention be-
tween the United States and the foreign country
in which the witness is being held in custody
which provides for the transfer, custody and re-
turn of such witnesses, the terms and conditions
of that treaty shall apply. Where there is no
such treaty or convention, the Attorney General
may exercise the authority described in para-
graph (a) if both the foreign country and the
witness give their consent.
(Added Pub. L. 100–690, title VI, § 6484(a), Nov. 18,
1988, 102 Stat. 4384.)
§ 3509. Child victims’ and child witnesses’ rights
(a) DEFINITIONS.—For purposes of this sec-
tion—
(1) the term ‘‘adult attendant’’ means an
adult described in subsection (i) who accom-
panies a child throughout the judicial process
for the purpose of providing emotional sup-
port;
(2) the term ‘‘child’’ means a person who is
under the age of 18, who is or is alleged to be—
(A) a victim of a crime of physical abuse,
sexual abuse, or exploitation; or
(B) a witness to a crime committed
against another person;
(3) the term ‘‘child abuse’’ means the phys-
ical or mental injury, sexual abuse or exploi-
tation, or negligent treatment of a child;
(4) the term ‘‘physical injury’’ includes lac-
erations, fractured bones, burns, internal inju-
ries, severe bruising or serious bodily harm;
(5) the term ‘‘mental injury’’ means harm to
a child’s psychological or intellectual func-
tioning which may be exhibited by severe anx-
iety, depression, withdrawal or outward ag-
gressive behavior, or a combination of those
behaviors, which may be demonstrated by a
change in behavior, emotional response, or
cognition;
(6) the term ‘‘exploitation’’ means child por-
nography or child prostitution;
(7) the term ‘‘multidisciplinary child abuse
team’’ means a professional unit composed of
representatives from health, social service,
law enforcement, and legal service agencies to
coordinate the assistance needed to handle
cases of child abuse;
(8) the term ‘‘sexual abuse’’ includes the em-
ployment, use, persuasion, inducement, en-
ticement, or coercion of a child to engage in,
or assist another person to engage in, sexually
explicit conduct or the rape, molestation,
prostitution, or other form of sexual exploi-
tation of children, or incest with children;
(9) the term ‘‘sexually explicit conduct’’
means actual or simulated—
(A) sexual intercourse, including sexual
contact in the manner of genital-genital,
oral-genital, anal-genital, or oral-anal con-
tact, whether between persons of the same
or of opposite sex; sexual contact means the
intentional touching, either directly or
through clothing, of the genitalia, anus,
groin, breast, inner thigh, or buttocks of any
person with an intent to abuse, humiliate,
harass, degrade, or arouse or gratify sexual
desire of any person;
(B) bestiality;
(C) masturbation;
(D) lascivious exhibition of the genitals or
pubic area of a person or animal; or
(E) sadistic or masochistic abuse;
(10) the term ‘‘sex crime’’ means an act of
sexual abuse that is a criminal act;
(11) the term ‘‘negligent treatment’’ means
the failure to provide, for reasons other than
poverty, adequate food, clothing, shelter, or
medical care so as to seriously endanger the
physical health of the child; and
(12) the term ‘‘child abuse’’ does not include
discipline administered by a parent or legal
guardian to his or her child provided it is rea-
sonable in manner and moderate in degree and
otherwise does not constitute cruelty.
(b) ALTERNATIVES
TO
LIVE
IN-COURT
TESTI-
MONY.—
(1) CHILD’S LIVE TESTIMONY BY 2-WAY CLOSED
CIRCUIT TELEVISION.—
(A) In a proceeding involving an alleged of-
fense against a child, the attorney for the
Government, the child’s attorney, or a
guardian ad litem appointed under sub-
section (h) may apply for an order that the
child’s testimony be taken in a room outside
the courtroom and be televised by 2-way
closed circuit television. The person seeking
such an order shall apply for such an order
at least 7 days before the trial date, unless
the court finds on the record that the need
for such an order was not reasonably foresee-
able.
(B) The court may order that the testi-
mony of the child be taken by closed-circuit
television as provided in subparagraph (A) if
the court finds that the child is unable to
testify in open court in the presence of the
defendant, for any of the following reasons:
(i) The child is unable to testify because
of fear.
(ii) There is a substantial likelihood, es-
tablished by expert testimony, that the
child would suffer emotional trauma from
testifying.
(iii) The child suffers a mental or other
infirmity.
Cross-references
Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Upon application of a party to a criminal case, a United States district court before which the case is pending may, to the extent permitted by a foreign country, appoint a special master to carry out at a deposition taken in that country such duties as the court may direct, including presiding at the deposition or serving as an advisor on questions of United States law. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a special master appointed under this section shall not decide questions of privilege under foreign law. The refusal of a court to appoint a special master under this section, or of the foreign country to permit a special master appointed under this section to carry out a duty at a deposition in that country, shall not affect the admissibility in evidence of a deposition taken under the provisions of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 18 U.S.C. § 3507
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.