Browse Arkansas Code titles and sections
7 U.S.C. § 7782 — Establishment of program
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 2105
TITLE 7—AGRICULTURE
§ 7782
‘‘(2) PROJECT
REQUIREMENTS.—The demonstration
projects under paragraph (1) shall—
‘‘(A) be carried out over a time period and to a
scale designed to fully assess long-term manage-
ment strategies;
‘‘(B) implement salt cedar or Russian olive tree
control using 1 or more methods for each project in
order to assess the full range of control methods,
including—
‘‘(i) airborne application of herbicides;
‘‘(ii) mechanical removal; and
‘‘(iii) biocontrol methods, such as the use of
goats or insects;
‘‘(C) individually or in conjunction with other
demonstration projects, assess the effects of and ob-
stacles to combining multiple control methods and
determine optimal combinations of control meth-
ods;
‘‘(D) assess soil conditions resulting from salt
cedar and Russian olive tree infestation and means
to revitalize soils;
‘‘(E) define and implement appropriate final vege-
tative states and optimal revegetation methods,
with preference for self-maintaining vegetative
states and native vegetation, and taking into con-
sideration downstream impacts, wildfire potential,
and water savings;
‘‘(F) identify methods for preventing the re-
growth and reintroduction of salt cedar and Rus-
sian olive trees;
‘‘(G) monitor and document any water savings
from the control of salt cedar and Russian olive
trees, including impacts to both groundwater and
surface water;
‘‘(H) assess wildfire activity and management
strategies;
‘‘(I) assess changes in wildlife habitat;
‘‘(J) determine conditions under which removal of
biomass is appropriate (including optimal methods
for the disposal or use of biomass); and
‘‘(K) assess economic and other impacts associ-
ated with control methods and the restoration and
maintenance of land.
‘‘(f) D
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 7 U.S.C. § 7782
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.
Original supplied file — preserved unchanged
Download original Markdown file
File SHA-256: a61a5f0f3b7c8ac94e8fca70de589c9089b5884b7447ccd76587c0c18c7ec5ae. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.
Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.
Open the recorded source website ↗
Record provenance
Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:usc2024-40601d06dbc72ffe99638f3c
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code-2024/title-7/section-7782-establishment-of-program--30e7cf0853.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: 4d46c9fc580bcce76be6b66fa69e7ff9f0738e2d2b91b27ed4b958abf91a886e
Source location: USCODE-2024-title7-chap104-subchapV-sec7782.pdf
Stored source content
Page 2105
TITLE 7—AGRICULTURE
§ 7782
‘‘(2) PROJECT
REQUIREMENTS.—The demonstration
projects under paragraph (1) shall—
‘‘(A) be carried out over a time period and to a
scale designed to fully assess long-term manage-
ment strategies;
‘‘(B) implement salt cedar or Russian olive tree
control using 1 or more methods for each project in
order to assess the full range of control methods,
including—
‘‘(i) airborne application of herbicides;
‘‘(ii) mechanical removal; and
‘‘(iii) biocontrol methods, such as the use of
goats or insects;
‘‘(C) individually or in conjunction with other
demonstration projects, assess the effects of and ob-
stacles to combining multiple control methods and
determine optimal combinations of control meth-
ods;
‘‘(D) assess soil conditions resulting from salt
cedar and Russian olive tree infestation and means
to revitalize soils;
‘‘(E) define and implement appropriate final vege-
tative states and optimal revegetation methods,
with preference for self-maintaining vegetative
states and native vegetation, and taking into con-
sideration downstream impacts, wildfire potential,
and water savings;
‘‘(F) identify methods for preventing the re-
growth and reintroduction of salt cedar and Rus-
sian olive trees;
‘‘(G) monitor and document any water savings
from the control of salt cedar and Russian olive
trees, including impacts to both groundwater and
surface water;
‘‘(H) assess wildfire activity and management
strategies;
‘‘(I) assess changes in wildlife habitat;
‘‘(J) determine conditions under which removal of
biomass is appropriate (including optimal methods
for the disposal or use of biomass); and
‘‘(K) assess economic and other impacts associ-
ated with control methods and the restoration and
maintenance of land.
‘‘(f) DISPOSITION OF BIOMASS.—
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 1 year after the
date on which funds are made available to carry out
this Act, the Secretary, in cooperation with the Sec-
retary of Agriculture, shall complete an analysis of
economic means to use or dispose of biomass created
as a result of removal of salt cedar and Russian olive
trees.
‘‘(2) REQUIREMENTS.—The analysis shall—
‘‘(A) determine conditions under which removal
of biomass is economically viable;
‘‘(B) consider and build upon existing research by
the Department of Agriculture and other agencies
on beneficial uses of salt cedar and Russian olive
tree fiber; and
‘‘(C) consider economic development opportuni-
ties, including manufacture of wood products using
biomass resulting from demonstration projects
under subsection (e) as a means of defraying costs
of control.
‘‘(g) COSTS.—
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—With respect to projects and ac-
tivities carried out under this Act—
‘‘(A) the assessment under subsection (c) shall be
carried out at a cost of not more than $4,000,000;
‘‘(B) the identification and documentation of
long-term management strategies under subsection
(d)(1) and the provision of grants under subsection
(d)(2) shall be carried out at a cost of not more than
$2,000,000;
‘‘(C) each demonstration project under subsection
(e) shall be carried out at a Federal cost of not
more than $7,000,000 (including costs of planning,
design, implementation, maintenance, and moni-
toring); and
‘‘(D) the analysis under subsection (f) shall be
carried out at a cost of not more than $3,000,000.
‘‘(2) COST-SHARING.—
‘‘(A) IN
GENERAL.—The assessment under sub-
section (c), the identification and documentation of
long-term management strategies under subsection
(d), a demonstration project or portion of a dem-
onstration project under subsection (e) that is car-
ried out on Federal land, and the analysis under
subsection (f) shall be carried out at full Federal
expense.
‘‘(B) DEMONSTRATION
PROJECTS
CARRIED
OUT
ON
NON-FEDERAL LAND.—
‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—The Federal share of the costs
of any demonstration project funded under sub-
section (e) that is not carried out on Federal land
shall not exceed 75 percent.
‘‘(ii) FORM
OF
NON-FEDERAL
SHARE.—The non-
Federal share of the costs of a demonstration
project that is not carried out on Federal land
may be provided in the form of in-kind contribu-
tions, including services provided by a State
agency or any other public or private partner.
‘‘(h) COOPERATION.—In carrying out the assessment
under subsection (c), the demonstration projects under
subsection (e), and the analysis under subsection (f),
the Secretary shall cooperate with and use the exper-
tise of Federal agencies and the other entities specified
in subsection (e)(1) that are actively conducting re-
search on or implementing salt cedar and Russian olive
tree control activities.
‘‘(i) INDEPENDENT REVIEW.—The Secretary shall sub-
ject to independent review—
‘‘(1) the assessment under subsection (c);
‘‘(2) the identification and documentation of long-
term management strategies under subsection (d);
‘‘(3) the demonstration projects under subsection
(e); and
‘‘(4) the analysis under subsection (f).
‘‘(j) REPORTING.—
‘‘(1) IN
GENERAL.—The Secretary shall submit to
Congress an annual report that describes the results
of carrying out this Act, including a synopsis of any
independent review under subsection (I) [sic] and de-
tails of the manner and purposes for which funds are
expended.
‘‘(2) PUBLIC ACCESS.—The Secretary shall facilitate
public access to all information that results from
carrying out this Act.
‘‘(k) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—There are authorized to be appro-
priated to carry out this Act—
‘‘(A) $20,000,000 for fiscal year 2006; and
‘‘(B) $15,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2007
through 2010.
‘‘(2) ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS.—Not more than 15 per-
cent of amounts made available under paragraph (1)
shall be used to pay the administrative costs of car-
rying out the program established under subsection
(a).
‘‘(l) TERMINATION OF AUTHORITY.—This Act and the
authority provided by this Act terminate on the date
that is 5 years after the date of the enactment of this
Act [Oct. 11, 2006].’’
§ 7782. Establishment of program
(a) In general
The Secretary shall establish a program to
provide financial and technical assistance to
control or eradicate noxious weeds.
(b) Grants
Subject to the availability of appropriations
under section 7786(a) of this title, the Secretary
shall make grants under section 7783 of this title
to weed management entities for the control or
eradication of noxious weeds.
(c) Agreements
Subject to the availability of appropriations
under section 7786(b) of this title, the Secretary
Page 2106
TITLE 7—AGRICULTURE
§ 7783
shall enter into agreements under section 7784 of
this title with weed management entities to pro-
vide financial and technical assistance for the
control or eradication of noxious weeds.
(Pub. L. 106–224, title IV, § 453, as added Pub. L.
108–412, § 1, Oct. 30, 2004, 118 Stat. 2321.)
§ 7783. Grants to weed management entities
(a) Consultation and consent
In carrying out a grant under this subchapter,
the weed management entity and the Secretary
shall—
(1) if the activities funded under the grant
will take place on Federal land, consult with
the heads of the Federal agencies having juris-
diction over the land; or
(2) obtain the written consent of the non-
Federal landowner.
(b) Grant considerations
In determining the amount of a grant to a
weed management entity, the Secretary shall
consider—
(1) the severity or potential severity of the
noxious weed problem;
(2) the extent to which the Federal funds
will be used to leverage non-Federal funds to
address the noxious weed problem;
(3) the extent to which the weed manage-
ment entity has made progress in addressing
the noxious weeds problem; and
(4) other factors that the Secretary deter-
mines to be relevant.
(c) Use of grant funds; cost shares
(1) Use of grants
A weed management entity that receives a
grant under subsection (a) shall use the grant
funds to carry out a project authorized by sub-
section (d) for the control or eradication of a
noxious weed.
(2) Cost shares
(A) Federal cost share
The Federal share of the cost of carrying
out an authorized project under this section
exclusively on non-Federal land shall not ex-
ceed 50 percent.
(B) Form of non-Federal cost share
The non-Federal share of the cost of car-
rying out an authorized project under this
section may be provided in cash or in kind.
(d) Authorized projects
Projects funded by grants under this section
include the following:
(1) Education, inventories and mapping,
management, monitoring, methods develop-
ment, and other capacity building activities,
including the payment of the cost of personnel
and equipment that promote control or eradi-
cation of noxious weeds.
(2) Other activities to control or eradicate
noxious weeds or promote control or eradi-
cation of noxious weeds.
(e) Application
To be eligible to receive assistance under this
section, a weed management entity shall pre-
pare and submit to the Secretary an application
containing such information as the Secretary
shall by regulation require.
(f) Selection of projects
Projects funded under this section shall be se-
lected by the Secretary on a competitive basis,
taking into consideration the following:
(1) The severity of the noxious weed problem
or potential problem addressed by the project.
(2) The likelihood that the project will pre-
vent or resolve the problem, or increase
knowledge about resolving similar problems.
(3) The extent to which the Federal funds
will leverage non-Federal funds to address the
noxious
weed
problem
addressed
by
the
project.
(4) The extent to which the program will im-
prove the overall capacity of the United
States to address noxious weed control and
management.
(5) The extent to which the weed manage-
ment entity has made progress in addressing
noxious weed problems.
(6) The extent to which the project will pro-
vide a comprehensive approach to the control
or eradication of noxious weeds.
(7) The extent to which the project will re-
duce the total population of noxious weeds.
(8) The extent to which the project promotes
cooperation and participation between States
that have common interests in controlling and
eradicating noxious weeds.
(9) Other factors that the Secretary deter-
mines to be relevant.
(g) Regional, State, and local involvement
In determining which projects receive funding
under this section, the Secretary shall, to the
maximum extent practicable—
(1) rely on technical and merit reviews pro-
vided by regional, State, or local weed man-
agement experts; and
(2) give priority to projects that maximize
the involvement of State, local and, where ap-
plicable, Indian Tribe governments.
(h) Special consideration
The Secretary shall give special consideration
to States with approved weed management enti-
ties established by Indian Tribes and may pro-
vide an additional allocation to a State to meet
the particular needs and projects that the weed
management entity plans to address.
(Pub. L. 106–224, title IV, § 454, as added Pub. L.
108–412, § 1, Oct. 30, 2004, 118 Stat. 2321.)
§ 7784. Agreements
(a) Consultation and consent
In carrying out an agreement under this sec-
tion, the Secretary shall—
(1) if the activities funded under the agree-
ment will take place on Federal land, consult
with the heads of the Federal agencies having
jurisdiction over the land; or
(2) obtain the written consent of the non-
Federal landowner.
(b) Application of other laws
The Secretary may enter into agreements
under this section with weed management enti-
ties notwithstanding sections 6301 through 6309
Cross-references
Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a) Authority to transfer certain funds** In connection with an emergency in which a plant pest or noxious weed threatens any segment of the agricultural production of the United States, the Secretary may transfer from other appropriations or funds available to the agencies or corporations of the Department of Agriculture such amounts as the Secretary considers necessary to be available in the emergency for the arrest, control, eradication, and prevention of the spread of the plant pest or noxious weed and for related expenses.
**(b) Availability** Any funds transferred under this section shall remain available for such purposes without fiscal year limitation.
**(c) Secretarial discretion** The action of any officer, employee, or agent of the Secretary in carrying out this Act, including determining the amount of and making any payment authorized to be made under this chapter, shall not be subject to a review by any officer or employee of the Federal Government other than the Secretary or the designee of the Secretary.
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 7 U.S.C. § 7782
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.