Arkansas Legal Resource Navigator

43 U.S.C. § 422c — Proposals; submission; payment for cost of

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

43 U.S.C. § 422c — Proposals; submission; payment for cost of

Page 141 TITLE 43—PUBLIC LANDS § 422d Federal reclamation laws, or (v) any project for the rehabilitation and betterment of a project or distinct unit described in clauses (i), (ii), (iii), and (iv): Provided, That the estimated total cost of the project described in clause (i), (ii), (iii), (iv), or (v) does not exceed the maximum allow- able estimated total project cost as determined by subsection (f) hereof: Provided further, That a project described in clause (i), (ii), or (iii) may consist of existing facilities as distinct from newly constructed facilities, and funds made available pursuant to this subchapter may be utilized to acquire such facilities subject to a determination by the Secretary that such facili- ties meet standards of design and construction which he shall promulgate and that the cost of such existing facilities represent less than fifty per centum of the cost of the project. Nothing contained in this subchapter shall preclude the making of more than one loan or grant, or com- bined loan and grant, to an organization so long as no two such loans or grants, or combinations thereof, are for the same project, as herein de- fined. (e) The term ‘‘Secretary’’ shall mean the Sec- retary of the Interior. (f) The maximum allowable estimated total project cost of a proposal submitted during any given calendar year shall be determined by the Secretary using the Bureau of Reclamation composite construction cost index for January of that year with $15,000,000 as the January 1971 base. (Aug. 6, 1956, ch. 972, § 2, 70 Stat. 1044; Pub. L. 89–553, § 1(1), Sept. 2, 1966, 80 Stat. 376; Pub. L. 92–167, § 1(1), Nov. 24, 1971, 85 Stat. 488; Pub. L. 94–181, § 1(a), (b), Dec. 27, 1975, 89 Stat. 1049.) Editorial Notes REFERENCES IN TEXT A

Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 43 U.S.C. § 422c

Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.

Original supplied file — preserved unchanged

Download original Markdown file

File SHA-256: 6eadec72af8b798b0fa867a655c33dc64c14b47e9cfa5df03bfc2a973da71a25. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.

Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.

Open the recorded source website ↗

Record provenance

Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:usc2024-3db344a45b08b98e5194ed2b
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code-2024/title-43/section-422c-proposals-submission-payment-for-cost-of--6f57a789ed.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: e1f8c771f5a0df4a317815b25b0ef2db75f43dc477e290b1418b1e26975e94a8

Source location: USCODE-2024-title43-chap12-subchapIV-sec422c.pdf

Stored source content

Page 141 TITLE 43—PUBLIC LANDS § 422d Federal reclamation laws, or (v) any project for the rehabilitation and betterment of a project or distinct unit described in clauses (i), (ii), (iii), and (iv): Provided, That the estimated total cost of the project described in clause (i), (ii), (iii), (iv), or (v) does not exceed the maximum allow- able estimated total project cost as determined by subsection (f) hereof: Provided further, That a project described in clause (i), (ii), or (iii) may consist of existing facilities as distinct from newly constructed facilities, and funds made available pursuant to this subchapter may be utilized to acquire such facilities subject to a determination by the Secretary that such facili- ties meet standards of design and construction which he shall promulgate and that the cost of such existing facilities represent less than fifty per centum of the cost of the project. Nothing contained in this subchapter shall preclude the making of more than one loan or grant, or com- bined loan and grant, to an organization so long as no two such loans or grants, or combinations thereof, are for the same project, as herein de- fined. (e) The term ‘‘Secretary’’ shall mean the Sec- retary of the Interior. (f) The maximum allowable estimated total project cost of a proposal submitted during any given calendar year shall be determined by the Secretary using the Bureau of Reclamation composite construction cost index for January of that year with $15,000,000 as the January 1971 base. (Aug. 6, 1956, ch. 972, § 2, 70 Stat. 1044; Pub. L. 89–553, § 1(1), Sept. 2, 1966, 80 Stat. 376; Pub. L. 92–167, § 1(1), Nov. 24, 1971, 85 Stat. 488; Pub. L. 94–181, § 1(a), (b), Dec. 27, 1975, 89 Stat. 1049.) Editorial Notes REFERENCES IN TEXT Act of June 17, 1902, referred to in par. (b), is popu- larly known as the Reclamation Act, which is classified generally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 371 of this title and Tables. AMENDMENTS 1975—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 94–181, § 1(a), substituted provisions limiting the estimated cost of the project described in cls. (i), (ii), (iii), (iv), and (v) to the max- imum allowable estimated total project cost as deter- mined by subsection (f) of this section, for provisions limiting the estimated cost of such projects to $15,000,000, and inserted proviso relating to a project de- scribed in cl. (i), (ii), or (iii). Subsec. (f). Pub. L. 94–181, § 1(b), added subsec. (f). 1971—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 92–167 redefined the size and character of projects which are eligible for approval under the program, increasing money limitation from $1,000,000 to $15,000,000 and making projects eligible, without being only for irrigation, for single purpose ir- rigation, single purpose drainage, multiple purpose, a distinct unit of the foregoing, or rehabilitation of any of the foregoing. 1966—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 89–553 raised from $5,000,000 to $6,500,000 the maximum amount for a loan or grant for a particular project. Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries RETROACTIVE EFFECT OF 1966 AMENDMENT Pub. L. 89–553, § 2, Sept. 2, 1966, 80 Stat. 377, provided that: ‘‘Nothing contained in this Act [amending this section and sections 422d, 422e, 422h, and 422j of this title] shall be applicable to or affect in any way the terms on which any loan or grant has been made prior to the effective date of this Act [Sept. 2, 1966].’’ § 422c. Proposals; submission; payment for cost of examination Any organization desiring to avail itself of the benefits provided in this subchapter shall sub- mit a proposal therefor to the Secretary in such form and manner as he shall prescribe. Each such proposal shall be accompanied by a pay- ment of $5,000 to defray, in part, the cost of ex- amining the proposal. (Aug. 6, 1956, ch. 972, § 3, 70 Stat. 1044; Pub. L. 99–546, title III, § 303, Oct. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 3053.) Editorial Notes AMENDMENTS 1986—Pub. L. 99–546 substituted ‘‘$5,000’’ for ‘‘$1,000’’. § 422d. Contents of proposals (a) Plans and estimates; review by States; alloca- tion of capital costs Any proposal with respect to the construction of a project which has not theretofore been au- thorized for construction under the Federal rec- lamation laws shall set forth, among other things, a plan and estimated cost in detail com- parable to those included in preauthorization re- ports required for a Federal reclamation project; shall have been submitted for review by the States of the drainage basin in which the project is located in like manner as provided in section 701–1(c) of title 33, except that the review may be limited to the State or States in which the project is located if the proposal is one solely for rehabilitation and betterment of an existing project; and shall include a proposed allocation of capital costs to functions such that costs for facilities used for a single purpose shall be allo- cated to that purpose and costs for facilities used for more than one purpose shall be so allo- cated among the purposes served that each pur- pose will share equitably in the costs of such joint facilities. The costs of means and measures to prevent loss of and damage to fish and wild- life resources shall be considered as project costs and allocated as may be appropriate among project functions. (b) Lands and water rights; ownership; financing (1) Every such proposal shall include a show- ing that the organization already holds or can acquire all lands and interests in land (except public and other lands and interests in land owned by the United States which are within the administrative jurisdiction of the Secretary and subject to disposition by him) and rights, pursuant to applicable State law, to the use of water necessary for the successful construction, operation, and maintenance of the project and that it is ready, able, and willing to finance oth- erwise than by loan and grant of Federal funds such portion of the cost of the project (which portion shall include all costs of acquiring lands, interests in land, and rights to the use of water), except as provided in section 422e(b)(2) of this title as the Secretary shall have advised is proper in the circumstances.

Cross-references

Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

43 U.S.C. § 422c — Proposals; submission; payment for cost of examination

Any organization desiring to avail itself of the benefits provided in this subchapter shall submit a proposal therefor to the Secretary in such form and manner as he shall prescribe. Each such proposal shall be accompanied by a payment of $5,000 to defray, in part, the cost of examining the proposal.

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 43 U.S.C. § 422c

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.