Browse Arkansas Code titles and sections
42 U.S.C. § 12102 — Definition of disability
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 8239
TITLE 42—THE PUBLIC HEALTH AND WELFARE
§ 12102
people with a range of substantially limiting impair-
ments are not people with disabilities;
‘‘(7) in particular, the Supreme Court, in the case of
Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. Wil-
liams, 534 U.S. 184 (2002), interpreted the term ‘sub-
stantially limits’ to require a greater degree of limi-
tation than was intended by Congress; and
‘‘(8) Congress finds that the current Equal Employ-
ment Opportunity Commission ADA regulations de-
fining the term ‘substantially limits’ as ‘significantly
restricted’ are inconsistent with congressional in-
tent, by expressing too high a standard.
‘‘(b) PURPOSES.—The purposes of this Act [see Short
Title of 2008 Amendment note above] are—
‘‘(1) to carry out the ADA’s objectives of providing
‘a clear and comprehensive national mandate for the
elimination of discrimination’ and ‘clear, strong, con-
sistent, enforceable standards addressing discrimina-
tion’ by reinstating a broad scope of protection to be
available under the ADA;
‘‘(2) to reject the requirement enunciated by the
Supreme Court in Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc.,
527 U.S. 471 (1999) and its companion cases that
whether an impairment substantially limits a major
life activity is to be determined with reference to the
ameliorative effects of mitigating measures;
‘‘(3) to reject the Supreme Court’s reasoning in Sut-
ton v. United Air Lines, Inc., 527 U.S. 471 (1999) with
regard to coverage under the third prong of the defi-
nition of disability and to reinstate the reasoning of
the Supreme Court in School Board of Nassau County
v. Arline, 480 U.S. 273 (1987) which set forth a broad
view of the third prong of the definition of handicap
under the Rehabilitation Act of 1973;
‘‘(4) to re
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 42 U.S.C. § 12102
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.
Original supplied file — preserved unchanged
Download original Markdown file
File SHA-256: d8014cc51bf96fec6e5ba348e3c76570b76833b657b8821cfacb2054e9cb4a5a. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.
Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.
Open the recorded source website ↗
Record provenance
Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:usc2024-3c0835df65fa6d5411e9fa78
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code-2024/title-42/section-12102-definition-of-disability--747c4e9418.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: 3090c46a051e3f6f440e86a614e1cc7c52f62be29ce96660c099907f2457b6e8
Source location: USCODE-2024-title42-chap126-sec12102.pdf
Stored source content
Page 8239
TITLE 42—THE PUBLIC HEALTH AND WELFARE
§ 12102
people with a range of substantially limiting impair-
ments are not people with disabilities;
‘‘(7) in particular, the Supreme Court, in the case of
Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. Wil-
liams, 534 U.S. 184 (2002), interpreted the term ‘sub-
stantially limits’ to require a greater degree of limi-
tation than was intended by Congress; and
‘‘(8) Congress finds that the current Equal Employ-
ment Opportunity Commission ADA regulations de-
fining the term ‘substantially limits’ as ‘significantly
restricted’ are inconsistent with congressional in-
tent, by expressing too high a standard.
‘‘(b) PURPOSES.—The purposes of this Act [see Short
Title of 2008 Amendment note above] are—
‘‘(1) to carry out the ADA’s objectives of providing
‘a clear and comprehensive national mandate for the
elimination of discrimination’ and ‘clear, strong, con-
sistent, enforceable standards addressing discrimina-
tion’ by reinstating a broad scope of protection to be
available under the ADA;
‘‘(2) to reject the requirement enunciated by the
Supreme Court in Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc.,
527 U.S. 471 (1999) and its companion cases that
whether an impairment substantially limits a major
life activity is to be determined with reference to the
ameliorative effects of mitigating measures;
‘‘(3) to reject the Supreme Court’s reasoning in Sut-
ton v. United Air Lines, Inc., 527 U.S. 471 (1999) with
regard to coverage under the third prong of the defi-
nition of disability and to reinstate the reasoning of
the Supreme Court in School Board of Nassau County
v. Arline, 480 U.S. 273 (1987) which set forth a broad
view of the third prong of the definition of handicap
under the Rehabilitation Act of 1973;
‘‘(4) to reject the standards enunciated by the Su-
preme Court in Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Ken-
tucky, Inc. v. Williams, 534 U.S. 184 (2002), that the
terms ‘substantially’ and ‘major’ in the definition of
disability under the ADA ‘need to be interpreted
strictly to create a demanding standard for quali-
fying as disabled,’ and that to be substantially lim-
ited in performing a major life activity under the
ADA ‘an individual must have an impairment that
prevents or severely restricts the individual from
doing activities that are of central importance to
most people’s daily lives’;
‘‘(5) to convey congressional intent that the stand-
ard created by the Supreme Court in the case of Toy-
ota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. Wil-
liams, 534 U.S. 184 (2002) for ‘substantially limits’, and
applied by lower courts in numerous decisions, has
created an inappropriately high level of limitation
necessary to obtain coverage under the ADA, to con-
vey that it is the intent of Congress that the primary
object of attention in cases brought under the ADA
should be whether entities covered under the ADA
have complied with their obligations, and to convey
that the question of whether an individual’s impair-
ment is a disability under the ADA should not de-
mand extensive analysis; and
‘‘(6) to express Congress’ expectation that the Equal
Employment Opportunity Commission will revise
that portion of its current regulations that defines
the term ‘substantially limits’ as ‘significantly re-
stricted’ to be consistent with this Act, including the
amendments made by this Act.’’
STUDY BY GENERAL ACCOUNTING OFFICE OF EXISTING
DISABILITY-RELATED EMPLOYMENT INCENTIVES
Pub. L. 106–170, title III, § 303(a), Dec. 17, 1999, 113
Stat. 1903, provided that, as soon as practicable after
Dec. 17, 1999, the Comptroller General was to undertake
a study to assess existing tax credits and other dis-
ability-related employment incentives under the Amer-
icans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12101 et
seq.) and other Federal laws, specifically addressing the
extent to which such credits and other incentives
would encourage employers to hire and retain individ-
uals with disabilities; and that, not later than 3 years
after Dec. 17, 1999, the Comptroller General was to
transmit to the appropriate congressional committees
a written report presenting the results of the study and
any appropriate recommendations for legislative or ad-
ministrative changes.
§ 12102. Definition of disability
As used in this chapter:
(1) Disability
The term ‘‘disability’’ means, with respect
to an individual—
(A) a physical or mental impairment that
substantially limits one or more major life
activities of such individual;
(B) a record of such an impairment; or
(C) being regarded as having such an im-
pairment (as described in paragraph (3)).
(2) Major life activities
(A) In general
For purposes of paragraph (1), major life
activities include, but are not limited to,
caring for oneself, performing manual tasks,
seeing, hearing, eating, sleeping, walking,
standing, lifting, bending, speaking, breath-
ing, learning, reading, concentrating, think-
ing, communicating, and working.
(B) Major bodily functions
For purposes of paragraph (1), a major life
activity also includes the operation of a
major bodily function, including but not
limited to, functions of the immune system,
normal cell growth, digestive, bowel, blad-
der, neurological, brain, respiratory, cir-
culatory, endocrine, and reproductive func-
tions.
(3) Regarded as having such an impairment
For purposes of paragraph (1)(C):
(A) An individual meets the requirement
of ‘‘being regarded as having such an impair-
ment’’ if the individual establishes that he
or she has been subjected to an action pro-
hibited under this chapter because of an ac-
tual or perceived physical or mental impair-
ment whether or not the impairment limits
or is perceived to limit a major life activity.
(B) Paragraph (1)(C) shall not apply to im-
pairments that are transitory and minor. A
transitory impairment is an impairment
with an actual or expected duration of 6
months or less.
(4) Rules of construction regarding the defini-
tion of disability
The definition of ‘‘disability’’ in paragraph
(1) shall be construed in accordance with the
following:
(A) The definition of disability in this
chapter shall be construed in favor of broad
coverage of individuals under this chapter,
to the maximum extent permitted by the
terms of this chapter.
(B) The term ‘‘substantially limits’’ shall
be interpreted consistently with the findings
and purposes of the ADA Amendments Act of
2008.
(C) An impairment that substantially lim-
its one major life activity need not limit
other major life activities in order to be con-
sidered a disability.
Page 8240
TITLE 42—THE PUBLIC HEALTH AND WELFARE
§ 12103
(D) An impairment that is episodic or in
remission is a disability if it would substan-
tially limit a major life activity when ac-
tive.
(E)(i) The determination of whether an im-
pairment substantially limits a major life
activity shall be made without regard to the
ameliorative effects of mitigating measures
such as—
(I) medication, medical supplies, equip-
ment, or appliances, low-vision devices
(which do not include ordinary eyeglasses
or contact lenses), prosthetics including
limbs and devices, hearing aids and coch-
lear implants or other implantable hearing
devices, mobility devices, or oxygen ther-
apy equipment and supplies;
(II) use of assistive technology;
(III) reasonable accommodations or aux-
iliary aids or services; or
(IV) learned behavioral or adaptive neu-
rological modifications.
(ii) The ameliorative effects of the miti-
gating measures of ordinary eyeglasses or
contact lenses shall be considered in deter-
mining whether an impairment substan-
tially limits a major life activity.
(iii) As used in this subparagraph—
(I) the term ‘‘ordinary eyeglasses or con-
tact lenses’’ means lenses that are in-
tended to fully correct visual acuity or
eliminate refractive error; and
(II) the term ‘‘low-vision devices’’ means
devices that magnify, enhance, or other-
wise augment a visual image.
(Pub. L. 101–336, § 3, July 26, 1990, 104 Stat. 329;
Pub. L. 110–325, § 4(a), Sept. 25, 2008, 122 Stat.
3555.)
Editorial Notes
REFERENCES IN TEXT
This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original
‘‘this Act’’, meaning Pub. L. 101–336, July 26, 1990, 104
Stat. 327, which is classified principally to this chapter.
For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see
Short Title note set out under section 12101 of this title
and Tables.
The ADA Amendments Act of 2008, referred to in par.
(4)(B), is Pub. L. 110–325, Sept. 25, 2008, 122 Stat. 3553.
Section 2 of the Act, relating to the findings and pur-
poses of the Act, is set out as a note under section 12101
of this title. For complete classification of this Act to
the Code, see Short Title of 2008 Amendment note
under section 12101 of this title and Tables.
AMENDMENTS
2008—Pub. L. 110–325 amended section generally. Prior
to amendment, section consisted of pars. (1) to (3) de-
fining for purposes of this chapter ‘‘auxiliary aids and
services’’, ‘‘disability’’, and ‘‘State’’.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 2008 AMENDMENT
Amendment by Pub. L. 110–325 effective Jan. 1, 2009,
see section 8 of Pub. L. 110–325, set out as a note under
section 705 of Title 29, Labor.
§ 12103. Additional definitions
As used in this chapter:
(1) Auxiliary aids and services
The term ‘‘auxiliary aids and services’’ in-
cludes—
(A) qualified interpreters or other effective
methods of making aurally delivered mate-
rials available to individuals with hearing
impairments;
(B) qualified readers, taped texts, or other
effective methods of making visually deliv-
ered materials available to individuals with
visual impairments;
(C) acquisition or modification of equip-
ment or devices; and
(D) other similar services and actions.
(2) State
The term ‘‘State’’ means each of the several
States, the District of Columbia, the Common-
wealth of Puerto Rico, Guam, American
Samoa, the Virgin Islands of the United
States, the Trust Territory of the Pacific Is-
lands, and the Commonwealth of the Northern
Mariana Islands.’’.
(Pub. L. 101–336, § 4, as added Pub. L. 110–325,
§ 4(b), Sept. 25, 2008, 122 Stat. 3556.)
Editorial Notes
REFERENCES IN TEXT
This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original
‘‘this Act’’, meaning Pub. L. 101–336, July 26, 1990, 104
Stat. 327, which is classified principally to this chapter.
For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see
Short Title note set out under section 12101 of this title
and Tables.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
EFFECTIVE DATE
Section effective Jan. 1, 2009, see section 8 of Pub. L.
110–325, set out as an Effective Date of 2008 Amendment
note under section 705 of Title 29, Labor.
Executive Documents
TERMINATION OF TRUST TERRITORY OF THE PACIFIC
ISLANDS
For termination of Trust Territory of the Pacific Is-
lands, see note set out preceding section 1681 of Title
48, Territories and Insular Possessions.
SUBCHAPTER I—EMPLOYMENT
§ 12111. Definitions
As used in this subchapter:
(1) Commission
The term ‘‘Commission’’ means the Equal
Employment Opportunity Commission estab-
lished by section 2000e–4 of this title.
(2) Covered entity
The term ‘‘covered entity’’ means an em-
ployer, employment agency, labor organiza-
tion, or joint labor-management committee.
(3) Direct threat
The term ‘‘direct threat’’ means a signifi-
cant risk to the health or safety of others that
cannot be eliminated by reasonable accommo-
dation.
(4) Employee
The term ‘‘employee’’ means an individual
employed by an employer. With respect to em-
ployment in a foreign country, such term in-
cludes an individual who is a citizen of the
United States.
Cross-references
Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a) Homosexuality and bisexuality** For purposes of the definition of “disability” in section 12102(2) 11 See References in Text note below. of this title, homosexuality and bisexuality are not impairments and as such are not disabilities under this chapter.
**(b) Certain conditions** Under this chapter, the term “disability” shall not include—
(1) transvestism, transsexualism, pedophilia, exhibitionism, voyeurism, gender identity disorders not resulting from physical impairments, or other sexual behavior disorders;
(2) compulsive gambling, kleptomania, or pyromania; or
(3) psychoactive substance use disorders resulting from current illegal use of drugs.
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. The source passage cites 42 U.S.C. § 12101. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 8237
TITLE 42—THE PUBLIC HEALTH AND WELFARE
§ 12101
read as follows: ‘‘The plan shall accompany the Presi-
dent’s annual budget submission to the Congress.’’
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
TERMINATION OF REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
For termination, effective May 15, 2000, of provisions
of law requiring submittal to Congress of any annual,
semiannual, or other regular periodic report listed in
House Document No. 103–7 (in which reports required
under subsecs. (a) and (b) of this section are listed as
the 20th item on page 84 and the 19th item on page 86),
see section 3003 of Pub. L. 104–66, as amended, set out
as a note under section 1113 of Title 31, Money and Fi-
nance.
§ 12007. No antitrust immunity or defenses
Nothing in this chapter shall be deemed to
convey to any person, partnership, corporation,
or other entity immunity from civil or criminal
liability under any antitrust law or to create de-
fenses to actions under any antitrust law. As
used in this section, ‘‘antitrust laws’’ means
those Acts set forth in section 12 of title 15.
(Pub. L. 101–218, § 10, Dec. 11, 1989, 103 Stat. 1869.)
Editorial Notes
REFERENCES IN TEXT
This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original
‘‘this Act’’, meaning Pub. L. 101–218, Dec. 11, 1989, 103
Stat. 1859, known as the Renewable Energy and Energy
Efficiency Technology Competitiveness Act of 1989,
which is classified principally to this chapter. For com-
plete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short
Title note set out under section 12001 of this title and
Tables.
CHAPTER 126—EQUAL OPPORTUNITY FOR
INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES
Sec.
12101.
Findings and purpose.
12102.
Definition of disability.
12103.
Additional definitions.
SUBCHAPTER I—EMPLOYMENT
12111.
Definitions.
12112.
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. The source passage cites 42 U.S.C. § 12101. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Where appropriate and to the extent authorized by law, the use of alternative means of dispute resolution, including settlement negotiations, conciliation, facilitation, mediation, factfinding, minitrials, and arbitration, is encouraged to resolve disputes arising under this chapter.
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 42 U.S.C. § 12102
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.