Browse Arkansas Code titles and sections
49 U.S.C. § 60108 — Inspection and maintenance
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 1757
TITLE 49—TRANSPORTATION
§ 60108
ended September 30, 1978, and September 30, 1979’’ are
substituted for ‘‘last two . . . preceding November 30,
1979’’ for clarity.
In subsection (c), the words ‘‘the Federal grants-in-
aid provisions of’’, ‘‘for payments to aid in the conduct
of pipeline safety programs in accordance with para-
graph (1) of this subsection’’, and ‘‘with necessary ad-
justments on account of overpayments and underpay-
ments’’ are omitted as surplus.
In subsection (d)(1), before clause (A), the word ‘‘pre-
scribe’’ is substituted for ‘‘by regulation, provide for’’
and ‘‘establish by regulation’’ for consistency in the re-
vised title and with other titles of the United States
Code. In clause (C), the words ‘‘to receive a payment
under this section’’ are substituted for ‘‘in order to par-
ticipate in the pipeline safety grant program under this
subsection’’, and the words ‘‘under section 60105 or 60106
of this title’’ are substituted for ‘‘pursuant to either an
annual certification by a State agency or an agreement
relating to inspection between a State agency and the
Secretary’’, to eliminate unnecessary words.
In subsection (d)(2), before clause (A), the words
‘‘qualifications prescribed’’ are substituted for ‘‘regula-
tions’’ for clarity and consistency.
Editorial Notes
AMENDMENTS
2016—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 114–183, § 17(1), added subsec.
(b) and struck out former subsec. (b). Prior to amend-
ment, text read as follows: ‘‘After notifying and con-
sulting with a State authority, the Secretary may
withhold any part of a payment when the Secretary de-
cides that the authority is not carrying out satisfac-
torily a safety program or not acting satisfactorily as
an agent. The Secretary may pay an authority under
this section only
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 49 U.S.C. § 60108
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.
Original supplied file — preserved unchanged
Download original Markdown file
File SHA-256: a69f776f2c4cba94ef9a955ecf4be588394aa8f8fb1d714b1e77d13d3988f6b5. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.
Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.
Open the recorded source website ↗
Record provenance
Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:usc2024-37bae471a7cee35e79842b11
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code-2024/title-49/section-60108-inspection-and-maintenance--c3e5091a1e.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: 54bb83d692ffff5db1a4e3a53e1e16d3507f794bfbd6252e07862aeb4ff31f84
Source location: USCODE-2024-title49-subtitleVIII-chap601-sec60108.pdf
Stored source content
Page 1757
TITLE 49—TRANSPORTATION
§ 60108
ended September 30, 1978, and September 30, 1979’’ are
substituted for ‘‘last two . . . preceding November 30,
1979’’ for clarity.
In subsection (c), the words ‘‘the Federal grants-in-
aid provisions of’’, ‘‘for payments to aid in the conduct
of pipeline safety programs in accordance with para-
graph (1) of this subsection’’, and ‘‘with necessary ad-
justments on account of overpayments and underpay-
ments’’ are omitted as surplus.
In subsection (d)(1), before clause (A), the word ‘‘pre-
scribe’’ is substituted for ‘‘by regulation, provide for’’
and ‘‘establish by regulation’’ for consistency in the re-
vised title and with other titles of the United States
Code. In clause (C), the words ‘‘to receive a payment
under this section’’ are substituted for ‘‘in order to par-
ticipate in the pipeline safety grant program under this
subsection’’, and the words ‘‘under section 60105 or 60106
of this title’’ are substituted for ‘‘pursuant to either an
annual certification by a State agency or an agreement
relating to inspection between a State agency and the
Secretary’’, to eliminate unnecessary words.
In subsection (d)(2), before clause (A), the words
‘‘qualifications prescribed’’ are substituted for ‘‘regula-
tions’’ for clarity and consistency.
Editorial Notes
AMENDMENTS
2016—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 114–183, § 17(1), added subsec.
(b) and struck out former subsec. (b). Prior to amend-
ment, text read as follows: ‘‘After notifying and con-
sulting with a State authority, the Secretary may
withhold any part of a payment when the Secretary de-
cides that the authority is not carrying out satisfac-
torily a safety program or not acting satisfactorily as
an agent. The Secretary may pay an authority under
this section only when the authority ensures the Sec-
retary that it will provide the remaining costs of a
safety program and that the total State amount spent
for a safety program (excluding grants of the United
States Government) will at least equal the average
amount spent for gas and hazardous liquid safety pro-
grams for the 3 fiscal years prior to the fiscal year in
which the Secretary makes the payment, except when
the Secretary waives this requirement. For each of fis-
cal years 2012 and 2013, the Secretary shall grant such
a waiver to a State if the State can demonstrate an in-
ability to maintain or increase the required funding
share of its safety program at or above the level re-
quired by this subsection due to economic hardship in
that State. For fiscal year 2014, and each fiscal year
thereafter, the Secretary may grant such a waiver to a
State if the State can make the demonstration de-
scribed in the preceding sentence.’’
Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 114–183, § 17(2), added subsec. (e).
2012—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 112–90 inserted at end ‘‘For
each of fiscal years 2012 and 2013, the Secretary shall
grant such a waiver to a State if the State can dem-
onstrate an inability to maintain or increase the re-
quired funding share of its safety program at or above
the level required by this subsection due to economic
hardship in that State. For fiscal year 2014, and each
fiscal year thereafter, the Secretary may grant such a
waiver to a State if the State can make the demonstra-
tion described in the preceding sentence.’’
2006—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 109–468, § 2(c), substituted
‘‘not more than 80 percent’’ for ‘‘not more than 50 per-
cent’’ in introductory provisions.
Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 109–468, § 2(d), substituted ‘‘spent
for gas and hazardous liquid safety programs for the 3
fiscal years prior to the fiscal year in which the Sec-
retary makes the payment, except when the Secretary
waives this requirement.’’ for ‘‘spent—
‘‘(1) for a gas safety program, for the fiscal years
that ended June 30, 1967, and June 30, 1968; and
‘‘(2) for a hazardous liquid safety program, for the
fiscal years that ended September 30, 1978, and Sep-
tember 30, 1979.’’
1996—Pub. L. 104–304 substituted ‘‘State pipeline safe-
ty grants’’ for ‘‘State grants’’ in section catchline.
§ 60108. Inspection and maintenance
(a) PLANS.—(1) Each person owning or oper-
ating a gas pipeline facility or hazardous liquid
pipeline facility shall carry out a current writ-
ten plan (including any changes) for inspection
and maintenance of each facility used in the
transportation and owned or operated by the
person. A copy of the plan shall be kept at any
office of the person the Secretary of Transpor-
tation considers appropriate. The Secretary also
may require a person owning or operating a
pipeline facility subject to this chapter to file a
plan for inspection and maintenance for ap-
proval.
(2) If the Secretary or a State authority re-
sponsible for enforcing standards prescribed
under this chapter decides that a plan required
under paragraph (1) of this subsection is inad-
equate for safe operation, the Secretary or au-
thority shall require the person to revise the
plan. Revision may be required only after giving
notice and an opportunity for a hearing. A plan
required under paragraph (1) must be practicable
and designed to meet the need for pipeline safe-
ty, must meet the requirements of any regula-
tions promulgated under section 60102(q), and
must include terms designed to enhance the
ability to discover safety-related conditions de-
scribed in section 60102(h)(1) of this title. In de-
ciding on the adequacy of a plan, the Secretary
or authority shall consider—
(A) relevant available pipeline safety infor-
mation;
(B) the appropriateness of the plan for the
particular kind of pipeline transportation or
facility;
(C) the reasonableness of the plan;
(D) the extent to which the plan will con-
tribute to—
(i) public safety;
(ii) eliminating hazardous leaks and mini-
mizing releases of natural gas from pipeline
facilities; and
(iii) the protection of the environment;
and
(E) the extent to which the plan addresses
the replacement or remediation of pipelines
that are known to leak based on the material
(including
cast
iron,
unprotected
steel,
wrought iron, and historic plastics with
known issues), design, or past operating and
maintenance history of the pipeline.
(3) REVIEW OF PLANS.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 2 years after
the date of enactment of this subparagraph,
and not less frequently than once every 5
years thereafter, the Secretary or relevant
State authority with a certification in effect
under section 60105 shall review each plan de-
scribed in this subsection.
(B) CONTEXT OF REVIEW.—The Secretary may
conduct a review under this paragraph as an
element of the inspection of the operator car-
ried out by the Secretary under subsection (b).
(C) INADEQUATE PROGRAMS.—If the Secretary
determines that a plan reviewed under this
paragraph does not comply with the require-
ments of this chapter (including any regula-
tions promulgated under this chapter), has not
been adequately implemented, is inadequate
Page 1758
TITLE 49—TRANSPORTATION
§ 60108
for the safe operation of a pipeline facility, or
is otherwise inadequate, the Secretary may
conduct enforcement proceedings under this
chapter.
(b) INSPECTION
AND
TESTING.—(1) The Sec-
retary shall inspect and require appropriate
testing of a pipeline facility subject to this
chapter that is not covered by a certification
under section 60105 of this title or an agreement
under section 60106 of this title. The Secretary
shall decide on the frequency and type of inspec-
tion and testing under this subsection on a case-
by-case basis after considering the following:
(A) the location of the pipeline facility.
(B) the type, size, age, manufacturer, meth-
od of construction, construction material, and
condition of the pipeline facility.
(C) the nature and volume of material trans-
ported through the pipeline facility.
(D) the pressure at which that material is
transported.
(E) climatic, geologic, and seismic charac-
teristics (including soil characteristics) and
conditions of the area in which the pipeline fa-
cility is located.
(F) existing and projected population and de-
mographic characteristics of the area in which
the pipeline facility is located.
(G) for a hazardous liquid pipeline facility,
the proximity of the area in which the facility
is located to an area that is unusually sen-
sitive to environmental damage.
(H) the frequency of leaks.
(I) other factors the Secretary decides are
relevant to the safety of pipeline facilities.
(2) To the extent and in amounts provided in
advance in an appropriation law, the Secretary
shall decide on the frequency of inspection
under paragraph (1) of this subsection. The Sec-
retary may reduce the frequency of an inspec-
tion of a master meter system.
(3) Testing under this subsection shall use the
most appropriate technology practicable.
(c) PIPELINE
FACILITIES
OFFSHORE
AND
IN
OTHER WATERS.—(1) In this subsection—
(A) ‘‘abandoned’’ means permanently re-
moved from service.
(B) ‘‘pipeline facility’’ includes an under-
water abandoned pipeline facility.
(C) if a pipeline facility has no operator, the
most recent operator of the facility is deemed
to be the operator of the facility.
(2)(A) Not later than May 16, 1993, on the basis
of experience with the inspections under section
3(h)(1)(A) of the Natural Gas Pipeline Safety Act
of 1968 or section 203(l)(1)(A) of the Hazardous
Liquid Pipeline Safety Act of 1979, as appro-
priate, and any other information available to
the Secretary, the Secretary shall establish a
mandatory, systematic, and, where appropriate,
periodic inspection program of—
(i) all offshore pipeline facilities; and
(ii) any other pipeline facility crossing
under, over, or through waters where a sub-
stantial likelihood of commercial navigation
exists, if the Secretary decides that the loca-
tion of the facility in those waters could pose
a hazard to navigation or public safety.
(B) In prescribing standards to carry out sub-
paragraph (A) of this paragraph—
(i) the Secretary shall identify what is a haz-
ard to navigation with respect to an under-
water abandoned pipeline facility; and
(ii) for an underwater pipeline facility aban-
doned after October 24, 1992, the Secretary
shall include requirements that will lessen the
potential that the facility will pose a hazard
to navigation and shall consider the relation-
ship between water depth and navigational
safety and factors relevant to the local marine
environment.
(3)(A) The Secretary shall establish by regula-
tion a program requiring an operator of a pipe-
line facility described in paragraph (2) of this
subsection to report a potential or existing navi-
gational hazard involving that pipeline facility
to the Secretary through the appropriate Coast
Guard office.
(B) The operator of a pipeline facility de-
scribed in paragraph (2) of this subsection that
discovers any part of the pipeline facility that is
a hazard to navigation shall mark the location
of the hazardous part with a Coast-Guard-ap-
proved marine buoy or marker and immediately
shall notify the Secretary as provided by the
Secretary under subparagraph (A) of this para-
graph. A marine buoy or marker used under this
subparagraph is deemed a pipeline sign or right-
of-way marker under section 60123(c) of this
title.
(4)(A) The Secretary shall establish a standard
that each pipeline facility described in para-
graph (2) of this subsection that is a hazard to
navigation is buried not later than 6 months
after the date the condition of the facility is re-
ported to the Secretary. The Secretary may ex-
tend that 6-month period for a reasonable period
to ensure compliance with this paragraph.
(B) In prescribing standards for subparagraph
(A) of this paragraph for an underwater pipeline
facility abandoned after October 24, 1992, the
Secretary shall include requirements that will
lessen the potential that the facility will pose a
hazard to navigation and shall consider the rela-
tionship between water depth and navigational
safety and factors relevant to the local marine
environment.
(5)(A) Not later than October 24, 1994, the Sec-
retary shall establish standards on what is an
exposed offshore pipeline facility and what is a
hazard to navigation under this subsection.
(B) Not later than 6 months after the Sec-
retary establishes standards under subparagraph
(A) of this paragraph, or October 24, 1995, which-
ever occurs first, the operator of each offshore
pipeline
facility
not
described
in
section
3(h)(1)(A) of the Natural Gas Pipeline Safety Act
of 1968 or section 203(l)(1)(A) of the Hazardous
Liquid Pipeline Safety Act of 1979, as appro-
priate, shall inspect the facility and report to
the Secretary on any part of the facility that is
exposed or is a hazard to navigation. This sub-
paragraph applies only to a facility that is be-
tween the high water mark and the point at
which the subsurface is under 15 feet of water, as
measured from mean low water. An inspection
that occurred after October 3, 1989, may be used
for compliance with this subparagraph if the in-
spection conforms to the requirements of this
subparagraph.
(C) The Secretary may extend the time period
specified in subparagraph (B) of this paragraph
Page 1759
TITLE 49—TRANSPORTATION
§ 60108
for not more than 6 months if the operator of a
facility satisfies the Secretary that the operator
has made a good faith effort, with reasonable
diligence, but has been unable to comply by the
end of that period.
(6)(A) The operator of a pipeline facility aban-
doned after October 24, 1992, shall report the
abandonment to the Secretary in a way that
specifies whether the facility has been aban-
doned properly according to applicable United
States Government and State requirements.
(B) Not later than October 24, 1995, the oper-
ator of a pipeline facility abandoned before Oc-
tober 24, 1992, shall report to the Secretary rea-
sonably available information related to the fa-
cility, including information that a third party
possesses. The information shall include the lo-
cation, size, date, and method of abandonment,
whether the facility has been abandoned prop-
erly under applicable law, and other relevant in-
formation the Secretary may require. Not later
than April 24, 1994, the Secretary shall specify
how the information shall be reported. The Sec-
retary shall ensure that the Government main-
tains the information in a way accessible to ap-
propriate Government agencies and State au-
thorities.
(C) The Secretary shall request that a State
authority having information on a collision be-
tween a vessel and an underwater pipeline facil-
ity report the information to the Secretary in a
timely way and make a reasonable effort to
specify the location, date, and severity of the
collision. Chapter 35 of title 44 does not apply to
this subparagraph.
(7) The Secretary may not exempt from this
chapter an offshore hazardous liquid pipeline fa-
cility only because the pipeline facility trans-
fers hazardous liquid in an underwater pipeline
between a vessel and an onshore facility.
(8) If, after reviewing existing Federal and
State regulations for hazardous liquid gathering
lines located offshore in the United States, in-
cluding within the inlets of the Gulf of Mexico,
the Secretary determines it is appropriate, the
Secretary shall issue regulations, after notice
and an opportunity for a hearing, subjecting off-
shore hazardous liquid gathering lines and haz-
ardous liquid gathering lines located within the
inlets of the Gulf of Mexico to the same stand-
ards and regulations as other hazardous liquid
gathering lines. The regulations issued under
this paragraph shall not apply to production
pipelines or flow lines.
(d) REPLACING CAST IRON GAS PIPELINES.—(1)
The Secretary shall publish a notice on the
availability of industry guidelines, developed by
the Gas Piping Technology Committee, for re-
placing cast iron pipelines. Not later than 2
years after the guidelines become available, the
Secretary shall conduct a survey of gas pipeline
operators with cast iron pipe in their systems to
establish—
(A) the extent to which each operator has
adopted a plan for the safe management and
replacement of cast iron;
(B) the elements of the plan, including the
anticipated rate of replacement; and
(C) the progress that has been made.
(2) Chapter 35 of title 44 does not apply to the
conduct of the survey.
(3) This subsection does not prevent the Sec-
retary from developing Government guidelines
or standards for cast iron gas pipelines as the
Secretary considers appropriate.
(4) Not later than December 31, 2012, and every
2 years thereafter, the Secretary shall conduct a
follow-up survey to measure the progress that
owners and operators of pipeline facilities have
made in adopting and implementing their plans
for the safe management and replacement of
cast iron gas pipelines.
(e) IN GENERAL.—After the completion of a
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Admin-
istration pipeline safety inspection, the Admin-
istrator of such Administration, or the State au-
thority certified under section 60105 of title 49,
United States Code, to conduct such inspection,
shall—
(1) within 30 days, conduct a post-inspection
briefing with the owner or operator of the gas
or hazardous liquid pipeline facility inspected
outlining any concerns; and
(2) within 90 days, to the extent practicable,
provide the owner or operator with written
preliminary findings of the inspection.
(Pub. L. 103–272, § 1(e), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1312;
Pub. L. 104–304, §§ 6, 20(h), Oct. 12, 1996, 110 Stat.
3800, 3805; Pub. L. 112–90, §§ 7(a), 18(a), 21(c), Jan.
3, 2012, 125 Stat. 1910, 1916, 1917; Pub. L. 114–183,
§ 7(a), June 22, 2016, 130 Stat. 518; Pub. L. 116–260,
div. R, title I, § 114(a), Dec. 27, 2020, 134 Stat.
2230.)
HISTORICAL AND REVISION NOTES
Revised
Section
Source (U.S. Code)
Source (Statutes at Large)
60108(a)(1) ..
49 App.:1680(a) (1st,
2d sentences).
Aug. 12, 1968, Pub. L. 90–481,
§ 13(a), 82 Stat. 726; Oct.
11, 1976, Pub. L. 94–477, § 6,
90 Stat. 2075; Nov. 30, 1979,
Pub. L. 96–129, §§ 104(b),
105(a), 93 Stat. 992, 994;
Oct.
22,
1986,
Pub.
L.
99–516, § 3(a)(2), 100 Stat.
2966; Oct. 31, 1988, Pub. L.
100–561,
§ 108(a)(1),
102
Stat. 2808; Oct. 24, 1992,
Pub. L. 102–508, § 102(c),
106 Stat. 3291.
49 App.:2009(a) (1st,
2d sentences).
Nov. 30, 1979, Pub. L. 96–129,
§ 210(a), 93 Stat. 1011; Oct.
22, 1986, Pub. L. 99–516,
§ 3(b)(2), 100 Stat. 2966;
Oct.
31,
1988,
Pub.
L.
100–561, § 207(c), 102 Stat.
2812.
60108(a)(2) ..
49 App.:1680(a)
(3d–5th, last sen-
tences).
49 App.:2009(a) (3d
sentence 1st–18th
words, last sen-
tence).
49 App.:2009(b).
Nov. 30, 1979, Pub. L. 96–129,
§ 210(b), 93 Stat. 1012; Oct.
24, 1992, Pub. L. 102–508,
§ 202(c)(1), 106 Stat. 3301.
60108(a)(3) ..
49 App.:1680(a) (6th
sentence).
49 App.:2009(a) (3d
sentence 19th–last
words).
60108(b)(1) ..
49 App.:1680(b)(1)
(1st sentence), (2).
Aug. 12, 1968, Pub. L. 90–481,
82 Stat. 720, § 13(b); added
Oct.
31,
1988,
Pub.
L.
100–561,
§ 108(a)(2),
102
Stat. 2808.
49 App.:2009(d)(1)
(1st sentence), (2).
Nov. 30, 1979, Pub. L. 96–129,
93 Stat. 989, § 210(d); added
Oct.
31,
1988,
Pub.
L.
100–561, § 207(a), 102 Stat.
2811; Oct. 24, 1992, Pub. L.
102–508, § 202(c)(2) (related
to § 210(d)(2)(D)), 106 Stat.
3301.
60108(b)(2) ..
49 App.:1680(b)(1)
(2d, 3d sentences).
Page 1760
TITLE 49—TRANSPORTATION
§ 60108
HISTORICAL AND REVISION NOTES—CONTINUED
Revised
Section
Source (U.S. Code)
Source (Statutes at Large)
49 App.:2009(d)(1)
(2d, 3d sentences).
60108(b)(3) ..
49 App.:1680(b)(1)
(last sentence).
49 App.:2009(d)(1)
(last sentence).
60108(c)(1) ..
49 App.:1672(h)(6)(A),
(D).
Aug. 12, 1968, Pub. L. 90–481,
82
Stat.
720,
§ 3(h)(6);
added Oct. 24, 1992, Pub.
L. 102–508, § 117, 106 Stat.
3298.
49 App.:2002(l)(7)(A),
(D).
Nov. 30, 1979, Pub. L. 96–129,
93
Stat.
989,
§ 203(l)(7);
added Oct. 24, 1992, Pub.
L. 102–508, § 216, 106 Stat.
3306.
60108(c)
(2)(A).
49 App.:1672(h)(3).
Aug. 12, 1968, Pub. L. 90–481,
82 Stat. 720, § 3(h)(1)–(4);
added Nov. 16, 1990, Pub.
L. 101–599, § 1(a), 104 Stat.
3038; Oct. 24, 1992, Pub. L.
102–508,
§ 108(1)–(4),
106
Stat. 3293.
49 App.:2002(l)(3).
Nov. 30, 1979, Pub. L. 96–129,
93 Stat. 989, § 203(l)(1)–(4);
added Nov. 16, 1990, Pub.
L. 101–599, § 1(b), 104 Stat.
3039; Oct. 24, 1992, Pub. L.
102–508,
§ 207(1)–(4),
106
Stat. 3302.
60108(c)
(2)(B).
49 App.:1672(h)(6)
(B)(i), (ii) (related
to paragraph (3)).
49 App.:2002(l)(7)
(B)(i), (ii) (related
to paragraph (3)).
60108(c)(3) ..
49 App.:1672(h)(1),
(2).
49 App.:2002(l)(1), (2).
60108(c)
(4)(A).
49 App.:1672(h)(4).
49 App.:2002(l)(4).
60108(c)
(4)(B).
49 App.:1672(h)
(6)(B)(ii) (related
to paragraph (4)).
49 App.:2002(l)
(7)(B)(ii) (related
to paragraph (4)).
60108(c)(5) ..
49 App.:1672(h)(5).
Aug. 12, 1968, Pub. L. 90–481,
82
Stat.
720,
§ 3(h)(5);
added Oct. 24, 1992, Pub.
L.
102–508,
§ 108(5),
106
Stat. 3294.
49 App.:2002(l)(6).
Nov. 30, 1979, Pub. L. 96–129,
93 Stat. 989, § 203(l)(5), (6);
added Oct. 24, 1992, Pub.
L.
102–508,
§ 207(5),
106
Stat. 3302.
60108(c)(6) ..
49 App.:1672(h)(6)(C).
49 App.:2002(l)(7)(C).
60108(c)(7) ..
49 App.:2002(l)(5).
60108(d) ......
49 App.:1680(c).
Aug. 12, 1968, Pub. L. 90–481,
82 Stat. 720, § 13(c); added
Oct.
24,
1992,
Pub.
L.
102–508,
§ 107,
106
Stat.
3293.
In subsection (a)(1), the word ‘‘prepare’’ is omitted as
surplus. The words ‘‘or offices’’ are omitted because of
1:1. The words ‘‘in accordance with regulations pre-
scribed by the Secretary or appropriate State agency’’
in 49 App.:1680(a) (1st sentence), ‘‘in accordance with
regulations prescribed by the Secretary or, where a cer-
tification or agreement pursuant to section 2004 of this
Appendix is in effect, by the appropriate State agency’’
in 49 App.:2009(a) (1st sentence), and ‘‘by regulation’’
are omitted as surplus because of 49:322(a) and sections
60102–60105 of the revised title.
In subsection (a)(2), before clause (A), the words ‘‘the
Secretary or’’ are added for clarity. The words ‘‘at any
time’’ in 49 App.:1680(a) (3d sentence) are omitted as
surplus.
In subsection (a)(3), the word ‘‘appropriate’’ is omit-
ted as surplus.
In subsection (b)(1), before clause (A), the words ‘‘to
ensure the safety of such pipeline facilities’’ and ‘‘fac-
tors’’ are omitted as surplus. In clause (G), the words
‘‘if any’’ are omitted as surplus.
In subsection (b)(2), the text of 49 App.:1680(b)(1) (3d
sentence) and 2009(d)(1) (3d sentence) is omitted as ob-
solete.
In subsection (c)(1)(B), the words ‘‘except with re-
spect to the initial inspection required under paragraph
(1)’’ are omitted as obsolete.
In subsection (c)(1)(C), the word ‘‘current’’ is omitted
as surplus.
In subsection (c)(2)(B), before clause (i), the words ‘‘to
carry out’’ are substituted for ‘‘under’’ because the Sec-
retary
does
not
prescribe
regulations
under
49
App.:1672(h)(3) or 2002(l)(3).
In subsection (c)(3), the text of 49 App.:1672(h)(1) and
2002(l)(1) is omitted as executed.
In
subsection
(c)(4)(A),
the
text
of
49
App.:1672(h)(4)(A) and 2002(l)(4)(A) is omitted as obso-
lete.
In subsection (c)(5)(A), the words ‘‘for the purposes of
this paragraph’’ are omitted as surplus.
In subsection (c)(5)(C), the words ‘‘an additional pe-
riod of’’ and ‘‘and care’’ are omitted as surplus.
In subsection (c)(6)(C), the words ‘‘relating to coordi-
nation of Federal information policies’’ are omitted as
surplus.
In subsection (c)(7), the words ‘‘regulation under’’ are
omitted as surplus. The word ‘‘because’’ is substituted
for ‘‘on the basis of the fact that’’ to eliminate unnec-
essary words.
In subsection (d)(2), the words ‘‘(relating to coordina-
tion of Federal information policy)’’ are omitted as
surplus.
Editorial Notes
REFERENCES IN TEXT
The date of enactment of this subparagraph, referred
to in subsec. (a)(3)(A), is the date of enactment of Pub.
L. 116–260, which was approved Dec. 27, 2020.
Section 3(h)(1)(A) of the Natural Gas Pipeline Safety
Act of 1968, referred to in subsec. (c)(2)(A), (5)(B), is sec-
tion 3(h)(1)(A) of Pub. L. 90–481, which was classified to
section 1672(h)(1)(A) of former Title 49, Transportation,
prior to repeal by Pub. L. 103–272, § 7(b), July 5, 1994, 108
Stat. 1379. For further details, see Historical and Revi-
sion Notes above.
Section 203(l)(1)(A) of the Hazardous Liquid Pipeline
Safety Act of 1979, referred to in subsec. (c)(2)(A),
(5)(B), is section 203(l)(1)(A) of Pub. L. 96–129, which was
classified to section 2002(l)(1)(A) of former Title 49,
Transportation, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 103–272, § 7(b),
July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1379. For further details, see His-
torical and Revision Notes above.
AMENDMENTS
2020—Subsec. (a)(2). Pub. L. 116–260, § 114(a)(1)(A)(i), in
introductory provisions, inserted ‘‘, must meet the re-
quirements of any regulations promulgated under sec-
tion 60102(q),’’ after ‘‘the need for pipeline safety’’.
Subsec. (a)(2)(D), (E). Pub. L. 116–260, § 114(a)(1)(A)(ii),
(iii), added subpars. (D) and (E) and struck out former
subpar. (D) which read as follows: ‘‘the extent to which
the plan will contribute to public safety and the protec-
tion of the environment.’’
Subsec. (a)(3). Pub. L. 116–260, § 114(a)(1)(B), added par.
(3) and struck out former par. (3) which read as follows:
‘‘A plan required under this subsection shall be made
available to the Secretary or State authority on re-
quest under section 60117 of this title.’’
Subsec. (b)(1)(B). Pub. L. 116–260, § 114(a)(2), inserted
‘‘construction material,’’ after ‘‘method of construc-
tion,’’.
2016—Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 114–183 added subsec. (e).
2012—Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 112–90, § 18(a), substituted
‘‘a gas pipeline’’ for ‘‘an intrastate gas pipeline’’.
Subsec. (c)(8). Pub. L. 112–90, § 21(c), added par. (8).
Subsec. (d)(4). Pub. L. 112–90, § 7(a), added par. (4).
1996—Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 104–304, § 6(1), struck out
‘‘transporting gas or hazardous liquid or’’ after ‘‘Each
person’’ and ‘‘a person’’.
Subsec. (b)(2). Pub. L. 104–304, § 6(2), struck out after
first sentence ‘‘However, an inspection must occur at
least once every 2 years.’’
Page 1761
TITLE 49—TRANSPORTATION
§ 60108
Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 104–304, § 6(3), substituted ‘‘OTHER
WATERS’’ for ‘‘NAVIGABLE WATERS’’ in heading.
Subsec. (c)(2)(A)(ii). Pub. L. 104–304, § 6(4), added cl.
(ii) and struck out former cl. (ii) which read as follows:
‘‘any other pipeline facility crossing under, over, or
through navigable waters (as defined by the Secretary)
if the Secretary decides that the location of the facility
in those navigable waters could pose a hazard to navi-
gation or public safety.’’
Subsec. (c)(2)(B). Pub. L. 104–304, § 20(h)(1), substituted
‘‘standards’’ for ‘‘regulations’’ in introductory provi-
sions.
Subsec. (c)(4)(A). Pub. L. 104–304, § 20(h)(2), sub-
stituted ‘‘establish a standard’’ for ‘‘require by regula-
tion’’.
Subsecs. (c)(4)(B), (d)(3). Pub. L. 104–304, § 20(h)(1), sub-
stituted ‘‘standards’’ for ‘‘regulations’’.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
TRANSFER OF FUNCTIONS
For transfer of authorities, functions, personnel, and
assets of the Coast Guard, including the authorities
and functions of the Secretary of Transportation relat-
ing thereto, to the Department of Homeland Security,
and for treatment of related references, see sections
468(b), 551(d), 552(d), and 557 of Title 6, Domestic Secu-
rity, and the Department of Homeland Security Reor-
ganization Plan of November 25, 2002, as modified, set
out as a note under section 542 of Title 6.
DEADLINE
Pub. L. 116–260, div. R, title I, § 114(b), Dec. 27, 2020, 134
Stat. 2231, provided that: ‘‘Not later than 1 year after
the date of enactment of this Act [Dec. 27, 2020], each
pipeline operator shall update the inspection and main-
tenance plan prepared by the operator under section
60108(a) of title 49, United States Code, to address the
elements described in the amendments to that section
made by subsection (a).’’
INFORMATION-SHARING SYSTEM
Pub. L. 114–183, § 10, June 22, 2016, 130 Stat. 520, pro-
vided that:
‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the
date of the enactment of this Act [June 22, 2016], the
Secretary of Transportation shall convene a working
group to consider the development of a voluntary infor-
mation-sharing system to encourage collaborative ef-
forts to improve inspection information feedback and
information sharing with the purpose of improving gas
transmission and hazardous liquid pipeline facility in-
tegrity risk analysis.
‘‘(b) MEMBERSHIP.—The working group convened pur-
suant to subsection (a) shall include representatives
from—
‘‘(1) the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety
Administration;
‘‘(2) industry stakeholders, including operators of
pipeline facilities, inspection technology, coating,
and cathodic protection vendors, and pipeline inspec-
tion organizations;
‘‘(3) safety advocacy groups;
‘‘(4) research institutions;
‘‘(5) State public utility commissions or State offi-
cials responsible for pipeline safety oversight;
‘‘(6) State pipeline safety inspectors;
‘‘(7) labor representatives; and
‘‘(8) other entities, as determined appropriate by
the Secretary.
‘‘(c) CONSIDERATIONS.—The working group convened
pursuant to subsection (a) shall consider and provide
recommendations to the Secretary on—
‘‘(1) the need for, and the identification of, a system
to ensure that dig verification data are shared with
in-line inspection operators to the extent consistent
with the need to maintain proprietary and security-
sensitive data in a confidential manner to improve
pipeline safety and inspection technology;
‘‘(2) ways to encourage the exchange of pipeline in-
spection information and the development of ad-
vanced pipeline inspection technologies and enhanced
risk analysis;
‘‘(3) opportunities to share data, including dig
verification data between operators of pipeline facili-
ties and in-line inspector vendors to expand knowl-
edge of the advantages and disadvantages of the dif-
ferent types of in-line inspection technology and
methodologies;
‘‘(4) options to create a secure system that protects
proprietary data while encouraging the exchange of
pipeline inspection information and the development
of advanced pipeline inspection technologies and en-
hanced risk analysis;
‘‘(5) means and best practices for the protection of
safety- and security-sensitive information and propri-
etary information; and
‘‘(6) regulatory, funding, and legal barriers to shar-
ing the information described in paragraphs (1)
through (4).
‘‘(d) PUBLICATION.—The Secretary shall publish the
recommendations provided under subsection (c) on a
publicly available Web site of the Department of Trans-
portation.’’
NATIONWIDE INTEGRATED PIPELINE SAFETY
REGULATORY DATABASE
Pub. L. 114–183, § 11, June 22, 2016, 130 Stat. 521, pro-
vided that:
‘‘(a) REPORT.—Not later than 1 year after the date of
enactment of this Act [June 22, 2016], the Secretary of
Transportation shall submit to the Committee on
Transportation and Infrastructure and the Committee
on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representa-
tives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and
Transportation of the Senate a report on the feasibility
of establishing a national integrated pipeline safety
regulatory inspection database to improve communica-
tion and collaboration between the Pipeline and Haz-
ardous Materials Safety Administration and State
pipeline regulators.
‘‘(b) CONTENTS.—The report submitted under sub-
section (a) shall include—
‘‘(1) a description of any efforts underway to test a
secure information-sharing system for the purpose
described in subsection (a);
‘‘(2) a description of any progress in establishing
common standards for maintaining, collecting, and
presenting pipeline safety regulatory inspection data,
and a methodology for sharing the data;
‘‘(3) a description of any inadequacies or gaps in
State
and
Federal
inspection,
enforcement,
geospatial, or other pipeline safety regulatory inspec-
tion data;
‘‘(4) a description of the potential safety benefits of
a national integrated pipeline safety regulatory in-
spection database; and
‘‘(5) recommendations, including those of stake-
holders for how to implement a secure information-
sharing system that protects proprietary and secu-
rity sensitive information and data for the purpose
described in subsection (a).
‘‘(c) CONSULTATION.—In implementing this section,
the Secretary shall consult with stakeholders, includ-
ing each State authority operating under a certifi-
cation to regulate intrastate pipelines under section
60105 of title 49, United States Code.
‘‘(d) ESTABLISHMENT
OF DATABASE.—The Secretary
may establish, if appropriate, a national integrated
pipeline safety regulatory database—
‘‘(1) after submission of the report required under
subsection (a); or
‘‘(2) upon notification to the Committee on Trans-
portation and Infrastructure and the Committee on
Energy and Commerce of the House of Representa-
tives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and
Transportation of the Senate of the need to establish
such database prior to the submission of the report
under subsection (a).’’
Page 1762
TITLE 49—TRANSPORTATION
§ 60108
REPORT ON NATURAL GAS LEAK REPORTING
Pub. L. 114–183, § 29, June 22, 2016, 130 Stat. 532, pro-
vided that:
‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 1 year after the
date of the enactment of this Act [June 22, 2016], the
Administrator of the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration shall submit to Congress a re-
port on the metrics provided to the Pipeline and Haz-
ardous Materials Safety Administration and other Fed-
eral and State agencies related to lost and unaccounted
for natural gas from distribution pipelines and systems.
‘‘(b) ELEMENTS.—The report required under sub-
section (a) shall include the following elements:
‘‘(1) An examination of different reporting require-
ments or standards for lost and unaccounted for nat-
ural gas to different agencies, the reasons for any
such discrepancies, and recommendations for harmo-
nizing and improving the accuracy of reporting.
‘‘(2) An analysis of whether separate or alternative
reporting could better measure the amounts and
identify the location of lost and unaccounted for nat-
ural gas from natural gas distribution systems.
‘‘(3) A description of potential safety issues associ-
ated with natural gas that is lost and unaccounted
for from natural gas distribution systems.
‘‘(4) An assessment of whether alternate reporting
and measures will resolve any safety issues identified
under paragraph (3), including an analysis of the po-
tential impact, including potential savings, on rate
payers and end users of natural gas products of such
reporting and measures.
‘‘(c) CONSIDERATION OF RECOMMENDATIONS.—If the Ad-
ministrator determines that alternate reporting struc-
tures or recommendations included in the report re-
quired under subsection (a) would significantly improve
the reporting and measurement of lost and unac-
counted for gas and safety of natural gas distribution
systems, the Administrator shall, not later than 1 year
after making such determination, issue regulations, as
the Administrator determines appropriate, to imple-
ment the recommendations.’’
REVIEW OF STATE POLICIES RELATING TO NATURAL GAS
LEAKS
Pub. L. 114–183, § 30, June 22, 2016, 130 Stat. 533, pro-
vided that:
‘‘(a) REVIEW.—The Administrator of the Pipeline and
Hazardous Materials Safety Administration shall con-
duct a State-by-State review of State-level policies
that—
‘‘(1) encourage the repair and replacement of leak-
ing natural gas distribution pipelines or systems that
pose a safety threat, such as timelines to repair leaks
and limits on cost recovery from ratepayers; and
‘‘(2) may create barriers for entities to conduct
work to repair and replace leaking natural gas pipe-
lines or distribution systems.
‘‘(b) REPORT.—Not later than 1 year after the date of
the enactment of this Act [June 22, 2016], the Adminis-
trator shall submit to the Committee on Transpor-
tation and Infrastructure and the Committee on En-
ergy and Commerce of the House of Representatives
and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Trans-
portation of the Senate a report containing the find-
ings of the review conducted under subsection (a) and
recommendations on Federal or State policies or best
practices to improve safety by accelerating the repair
and replacement of natural gas pipelines or systems
that are leaking or releasing natural gas. The report
shall consider the potential impact, including potential
savings, of the implementation of such recommenda-
tions on ratepayers or end users of the natural gas
pipeline system.
‘‘(c) IMPLEMENTATION
OF RECOMMENDATIONS.—If the
Administrator determines that the recommendations
made under subsection (b) would significantly improve
pipeline safety, the Administrator shall, not later than
1 year after making such determination, and in coordi-
nation with the heads of other relevant agencies as ap-
propriate, issue regulations, as the Administrator de-
termines appropriate, to implement the recommenda-
tions.’’
LEAK DETECTION
Pub. L. 112–90, § 8, Jan. 3, 2012, 125 Stat. 1911, provided
that:
‘‘(a) LEAK DETECTION REPORT.—
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 1 year after the
date of enactment of this Act [Jan. 3, 2012], the Sec-
retary of Transportation shall submit to the Com-
mittee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of
the Senate and the Committee on Transportation and
Infrastructure and the Committee on Energy and
Commerce of the House of Representatives a report
on leak detection systems utilized by operators of
hazardous liquid pipeline facilities and transpor-
tation-related flow lines.
‘‘(2) CONTENTS.—The report shall include—
‘‘(A) an analysis of the technical limitations of
current leak detection systems, including the abil-
ity of the systems to detect ruptures and small
leaks that are ongoing or intermittent, and what
can be done to foster development of better tech-
nologies; and
‘‘(B) an analysis of the practicability of estab-
lishing technically, operationally, and economi-
cally feasible standards for the capability of such
systems to detect leaks, and the safety benefits and
adverse consequences of requiring operators to use
leak detection systems.
‘‘(b) RULEMAKING REQUIREMENTS.—
‘‘(1) REVIEW
PERIOD
DEFINED.—In this subsection,
the term ‘review period’ means the period beginning
on the date of enactment of this Act [Jan. 3, 2012] and
ending on the earlier of—
‘‘(A) the date that is 1 year after the date of com-
pletion of the report under subsection (a); or
‘‘(B) the date that is 2 years after the date of en-
actment of this Act.
‘‘(2) CONGRESSIONAL AUTHORITY.—In order to provide
Congress the necessary time to review the results of
the report required by subsection (a) and implement
appropriate recommendations, the Secretary, during
the review period, shall not issue final regulations de-
scribed in paragraph (3).
‘‘(3) STANDARDS.—As soon as practicable following
the review period, if the report required by subsection
(a) finds that it is practicable to establish tech-
nically, operationally, and economically feasible
standards for the capability of leak detection systems
to detect leaks, the Secretary shall issue final regula-
tions that—
‘‘(A) require operators of hazardous liquid pipe-
line facilities to use leak detection systems where
practicable; and
‘‘(B) establish technically, operationally, and eco-
nomically feasible standards for the capability of
such systems to detect leaks.
‘‘(4) SAVINGS CLAUSE.—
‘‘(A) IN
GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other
provision of this subsection, the Secretary, during
the review period, may issue final regulations de-
scribed in paragraph (3) if the Secretary determines
that a condition that poses a risk to public safety,
property, or the environment is present or an immi-
nent hazard exists and that the regulations will ad-
dress the risk or hazard.
‘‘(B) IMMINENT HAZARD DEFINED.—In subparagraph
(A), the term ‘imminent hazard’ means the exist-
ence of a condition related to pipelines or pipeline
operations that presents a substantial likelihood
that death, serious illness, severe personal injury,
or substantial endangerment to health, property, or
the environment may occur.’’
[Terms used in section 8 of Pub. L. 112–90, set out
above, have the meaning given those terms in this
chapter, see section 1(c)(1) of Pub. L. 112–90, set out as
a note under section 60101 of this title.]
Page 1763
TITLE 49—TRANSPORTATION
§ 60109
PIPELINE BRIDGE RISK STUDY
Pub. L. 107–355, § 25, Dec. 17, 2002, 116 Stat. 3011, re-
quired the Secretary of Transportation to conduct a
study to determine whether cable-suspension pipeline
bridges pose structural or other risks warranting par-
ticularized attention in connection with pipeline opera-
tors risk assessment programs and whether particular-
ized inspection standards need to be developed by the
Department of Transportation to recognize the peculiar
risks posed by such bridges and to transmit a report de-
tailing the results of the completed study within 2
years after Dec. 17, 2002.
STUDY OF UNDERWATER ABANDONED PIPELINE
FACILITIES
Pub. L. 102–508, title III, § 307, Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat.
3309, directed Secretary of Transportation, in consulta-
tion with State and other Federal agencies having au-
thority over underwater natural gas and hazardous liq-
uid pipeline facilities and with pipeline owners and op-
erators, fishing and maritime industries, and other af-
fected groups, to submit to Congress, not later than 3
years after Oct. 24, 1992, report and recommendations
on abandonment of such pipeline facilities, including
analysis of problems caused by such facilities, alter-
native methods to abandonment, as well as naviga-
tional, safety, economic, and environmental impacts
associated with abandonment, and further authorized
Secretary to require, based on findings of such study,
additional appropriate actions to prevent hazards to
navigation in connection with such facilities.
§ 60109. High-density population areas and envi-
ronmentally sensitive areas
(a) IDENTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS.—Not later
than October 24, 1994, the Secretary of Transpor-
tation shall prescribe standards that—
(1) establish criteria for identifying—
(A) by operators of gas pipeline facilities,
each gas pipeline facility (except a natural
gas distribution line) located in a high-den-
sity population area; and
(B) by operators of hazardous liquid pipe-
line facilities and gathering lines—
(i) each hazardous liquid pipeline facil-
ity, whether otherwise subject to this
chapter, that crosses waters where a sub-
stantial likelihood of commercial naviga-
tion exists or that is located in an area de-
scribed in the criteria as a high-density
population area; and
(ii) each hazardous liquid pipeline facil-
ity and gathering line, whether otherwise
subject to this chapter, located in an area
that the Secretary, in consultation with
the Administrator of the Environmental
Protection Agency, describes as unusually
sensitive to environmental damage if there
is a hazardous liquid pipeline accident; and
(2) provide that the identification be carried
out through the inventory required under sec-
tion 60102(e) of this title.
(b) AREAS TO BE INCLUDED AS UNUSUALLY SEN-
SITIVE.—When describing areas that are unusu-
ally sensitive to environmental damage if there
is a hazardous liquid pipeline accident, the Sec-
retary shall consider areas where a pipeline rup-
ture would likely cause permanent or long-term
environmental damage, including—
(1) locations near pipeline rights-of-way that
are critical to drinking water, including in-
take locations for community water systems
and critical sole source aquifer protection
areas; and
(2) locations near pipeline rights-of-way that
are part of the Great Lakes or have been iden-
tified as coastal beaches, certain coastal wa-
ters, critical wetlands, riverine or estuarine
systems, national parks, wilderness areas,
wildlife preservation areas or refuges, wild and
scenic rivers, or critical habitat areas for
threatened and endangered species.
(c) RISK ANALYSIS AND INTEGRITY MANAGEMENT
PROGRAMS.—
(1) REQUIREMENT.—Each operator of a gas
pipeline facility shall conduct an analysis of
the risks to each facility of the operator lo-
cated in an area identified pursuant to sub-
section (a)(1) and defined in chapter 192 of title
49, Code of Federal Regulations, including any
subsequent modifications, and shall adopt and
implement a written integrity management
program for such facility to reduce the risks.
(2) REGULATIONS.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 12 months
after the date of enactment of this sub-
section, the Secretary shall issue regula-
tions prescribing standards to direct an op-
erator’s conduct of a risk analysis and adop-
tion and implementation of an integrity
management program under this subsection.
The regulations shall require an operator to
conduct a risk analysis and adopt an integ-
rity management program within a time pe-
riod prescribed by the Secretary, ending not
later than 24 months after such date of en-
actment. Not later than 18 months after
such date of enactment, each operator of a
gas pipeline facility shall begin a baseline
integrity assessment described in paragraph
(3).
(B) AUTHORITY TO ISSUE REGULATIONS.—The
Secretary may satisfy the requirements of
this paragraph through the issuance of regu-
lations under this paragraph or under other
authority of law.
(3) MINIMUM
REQUIREMENTS
OF
INTEGRITY
MANAGEMENT
PROGRAMS.—An integrity man-
agement program required under paragraph (1)
shall include, at a minimum, the following re-
quirements:
(A) A baseline integrity assessment of
each of the operator’s facilities in areas
identified pursuant to subsection (a)(1) and
defined in chapter 192 of title 49, Code of
Federal Regulations, including any subse-
quent modifications, by internal inspection
device, pressure testing, direct assessment,
or an alternative method that the Secretary
determines would provide an equal or great-
er level of safety. The operator shall com-
plete such assessment not later than 10
years after the date of enactment of this
subsection. At least 50 percent of such facili-
ties shall be assessed not later than 5 years
after such date of enactment. The operator
shall prioritize such facilities for assessment
based on all risk factors, including any pre-
viously discovered defects or anomalies and
any history of leaks, repairs, or failures. The
operator shall ensure that assessments of fa-
cilities with the highest risks are given pri-
ority for completion and that such assess-
ments will be completed not later than 5
years after such date of enactment.
Cross-references
Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a) Plans.—**
(1) Each person owning or operating a gas pipeline facility or hazardous liquid pipeline facility shall carry out a current written plan (including any changes) for inspection and maintenance of each facility used in the transportation and owned or operated by the person. A copy of the plan shall be kept at any office of the person the Secretary of Transportation considers appropriate. The Secretary also may require a person owning or operating a pipeline facility subject to this chapter to file a plan for inspection and maintenance for approval.
(2) If the Secretary or a State authority responsible for enforcing standards prescribed under this chapter decides that a plan required under paragraph (1) of this subsection is inadequate for safe operation, the Secretary or authority shall require the person to revise the plan. Revision may be required only after giving notice and an opportunity for a hearing. A plan required under paragraph (1) must be practicable and designed to meet the need for pipeline safety, must meet the requirements of any regulations promulgated under section 60102(q), and must include terms designed to enhance the ability to discover safety-related conditions described in [section 60102(h)(1) of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title49-section60102/h/1&num=0&edition=prelim). In deciding on the adequacy of a plan, the Secretary or authority shall consider—
(A) relevant available pipeline safety information;
(B) the appropriateness of the plan for the particular kind of pipeline transportation or facility;
(C) the reasonableness of the plan;
(D) the extent to which the plan will contribute to—
(i) public safety;
(ii) eliminating hazardous leaks and minimizing releases of
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 49 U.S.C. § 60108
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.