Arkansas Legal Resource Navigator

6 U.S.C. § 195 — Office for Interoperability and Compat-

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

6 U.S.C. § 195 — Office for Interoperability and Compat-

Page 81 TITLE 6—DOMESTIC SECURITY § 195 1 See Change of Name note below. et, and the Department of State shall report to the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Trans- portation and the House of Representatives Committee on Energy and Commerce on— ‘‘(1) the status of the mechanism established by the President under section 7303(c) of the Intelligence Re- form and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 (6 U.S.C. 194(c)) for coordinating cross border interoperability issues between— ‘‘(A) the United States and Canada; and ‘‘(B) the United States and Mexico; ‘‘(2) the status of treaty negotiations with Canada and Mexico regarding the coordination of the re- banding of 800 megahertz radios, as required under the final rule of the Federal Communication Commis- sion in the ‘Private Land Mobile Services; 800 MHz Public Safety Interface Proceeding’ (WT Docket No. 02–55; ET Docket No. 00–258; ET Docket No. 95–18, RM–9498; RM–10024; FCC 04–168) including the status of any outstanding issues in the negotiations be- tween— ‘‘(A) the United States and Canada; and ‘‘(B) the United States and Mexico; ‘‘(3) communications between the Commission and the Department of State over possible amendments to the bilateral legal agreements and protocols that govern the coordination process for license applica- tions seeking to use channels and frequencies above Line A; ‘‘(4) the annual rejection rate for the last 5 years by the United States of applications for new channels and frequencies by Canadian private and public enti- ties; and ‘‘(5) any additional procedures and mechanisms that can be taken by the Commission to decrease the rejection rate for applications by United States pri- vate and public entities seeking licenses to use chan- nels and frequencies above Li

Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 6 U.S.C. § 195

Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.

Original supplied file — preserved unchanged

Download original Markdown file

File SHA-256: 50153261a550af183482a21b10e69e623edf4bedec87de8bc423c66711efd441. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.

Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.

Open the recorded source website ↗

Record provenance

Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:usc2024-36a0586c44db42c4b6833902
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code-2024/title-6/section-195-office-for-interoperability-and-compat--3671dbc319.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: 03f91ea83e438faaed0868fab2c852a92ea0d384822f0e2b1ab25561d5cf2f98

Source location: USCODE-2024-title6-chap1-subchapIII-sec195.pdf

Stored source content

Page 81 TITLE 6—DOMESTIC SECURITY § 195 1 See Change of Name note below. et, and the Department of State shall report to the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Trans- portation and the House of Representatives Committee on Energy and Commerce on— ‘‘(1) the status of the mechanism established by the President under section 7303(c) of the Intelligence Re- form and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 (6 U.S.C. 194(c)) for coordinating cross border interoperability issues between— ‘‘(A) the United States and Canada; and ‘‘(B) the United States and Mexico; ‘‘(2) the status of treaty negotiations with Canada and Mexico regarding the coordination of the re- banding of 800 megahertz radios, as required under the final rule of the Federal Communication Commis- sion in the ‘Private Land Mobile Services; 800 MHz Public Safety Interface Proceeding’ (WT Docket No. 02–55; ET Docket No. 00–258; ET Docket No. 95–18, RM–9498; RM–10024; FCC 04–168) including the status of any outstanding issues in the negotiations be- tween— ‘‘(A) the United States and Canada; and ‘‘(B) the United States and Mexico; ‘‘(3) communications between the Commission and the Department of State over possible amendments to the bilateral legal agreements and protocols that govern the coordination process for license applica- tions seeking to use channels and frequencies above Line A; ‘‘(4) the annual rejection rate for the last 5 years by the United States of applications for new channels and frequencies by Canadian private and public enti- ties; and ‘‘(5) any additional procedures and mechanisms that can be taken by the Commission to decrease the rejection rate for applications by United States pri- vate and public entities seeking licenses to use chan- nels and frequencies above Line A. ‘‘(b) UPDATED REPORTS TO BE FILED ON THE STATUS OF TREATY OF [SIC] NEGOTIATIONS.—The Federal Commu- nications Commission, in conjunction with the Depart- ment of Homeland Security, the Office of Management of Budget, and the Department of State shall contin- ually provide updated reports to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate and the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives on the status of treaty nego- tiations under subsection (a)(2) until the appropriate United States treaty has been revised with each of— ‘‘(1) Canada; and ‘‘(2) Mexico. ‘‘(c) INTERNATIONAL NEGOTIATIONS TO REMEDY SITUA- TION.—Not later than 90 days after the date of enact- ment of this Act [Aug. 3, 2007], the Secretary of the De- partment of State shall report to Congress on— ‘‘(1) the current process for considering applications by Canada for frequencies and channels by United States communities above Line A; ‘‘(2) the status of current negotiations to reform and revise such process; ‘‘(3) the estimated date of conclusion for such nego- tiations; ‘‘(4) whether the current process allows for auto- matic denials or dismissals of initial applications by the Government of Canada, and whether such denials or dismissals are currently occurring; and ‘‘(5) communications between the Department of State and the Federal Communications Commission pursuant to subsection (a)(3).’’ SUBMISSION OF REPORTS TO APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES Pub. L. 110–53, title XXII, § 2205, Aug. 3, 2007, 121 Stat. 543, provided that: ‘‘In addition to the committees spe- cifically enumerated to receive reports under this title [enacting provisions set out as note under this section, section 701 of this title, and section 247d–3a of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, and amending provi- sions set out as a note under section 309 of Title 47, Telecommunications], any report transmitted under the provisions of this title shall also be transmitted to the appropriate congressional committees (as defined in section 2(2) of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 101(2))).’’ REGIONAL MODEL STRATEGIC PLAN PILOT PROJECTS Pub. L. 108–458, title VII, § 7304, Dec. 17, 2004, 118 Stat. 3847, directed the Secretary of Homeland Security, not later than 90 days after Dec. 17, 2004, to establish not fewer than 2 pilot projects in high threat urban areas or regions likely to implement a national model stra- tegic plan in order to develop a regional strategic plan to foster interagency communication and coordinate the gathering of all Federal, State, and local first re- sponders in that area, consistent with the national strategic plan developed by the Department of Home- land Security, and to submit to Congress an interim re- port regarding the progress of the interagency commu- nications pilot projects 6 months after Dec. 17, 2004, and a final report 18 months after Dec. 17, 2004. § 195. Office for Interoperability and Compat- ibility (a) Clarification of responsibilities The Director of the Office for Interoperability and Compatibility shall— (1) assist the Secretary in developing and implementing the science and technology as- pects of the program described in subpara- graphs (D), (E), (F), and (G) of section 194(a)(1) of this title; (2) in coordination with the Federal Commu- nications Commission, the National Institute of Standards and Technology, and other Fed- eral departments and agencies with responsi- bility for standards, support the creation of national voluntary consensus standards for interoperable emergency communications; (3) establish a comprehensive research, de- velopment, testing, and evaluation program for improving interoperable emergency com- munications; (4) establish, in coordination with the Direc- tor for Emergency Communications,1 require- ments for interoperable emergency commu- nications capabilities, which shall be non- proprietary where standards for such capabili- ties exist, for all public safety radio and data communications systems and equipment pur- chased using homeland security assistance ad- ministered by the Department, excluding any alert and warning device, technology, or sys- tem; (5) carry out the Department’s responsibil- ities and authorities relating to research, de- velopment, testing, evaluation, or standards- related elements of the SAFECOM Program; (6) evaluate and assess new technology in real-world environments to achieve interoper- able emergency communications capabilities; (7) encourage more efficient use of existing resources, including equipment, to achieve interoperable emergency communications ca- pabilities; (8) test public safety communications sys- tems that are less prone to failure, support new nonvoice services, use spectrum more effi- ciently, and cost less than existing systems; (9) coordinate with the private sector to de- velop solutions to improve emergency commu- Page 82 TITLE 6—DOMESTIC SECURITY § 195a nications capabilities and achieve interoper- able emergency communications capabilities; and (10) conduct pilot projects, in coordination with the Director for Emergency Communica- tions,1 to test and demonstrate technologies, including data and video, that enhance— (A) the ability of emergency response pro- viders and relevant government officials to continue to communicate in the event of natural disasters, acts of terrorism, and other man-made disasters; and (B) interoperable emergency communica- tions capabilities. (b) Coordination The Director of the Office for Interoperability and Compatibility shall coordinate with the Di- rector for Emergency Communications 1 with re- spect to the SAFECOM program. (c) Sufficiency of resources The Secretary shall provide the Office for Interoperability and Compatibility the re- sources and staff necessary to carry out the re- sponsibilities under this section. (Pub. L. 107–296, title III, § 314, as added Pub. L. 109–295, title VI, § 672(a), Oct. 4, 2006, 120 Stat. 1441.) Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries CHANGE OF NAME Reference to Director for Emergency Communica- tions deemed to be a reference to Assistant Director for Emergency Communications, see section 2(c)(2) of Pub. L. 115–278, set out as a note under section 571 of this title. § 195a. Emergency communications interoper- ability research and development (a) In general The Under Secretary for Science and Tech- nology, acting through the Director of the Office for Interoperability and Compatibility, shall es- tablish a comprehensive research and develop- ment program to support and promote— (1) the ability of emergency response pro- viders and relevant government officials to continue to communicate in the event of nat- ural disasters, acts of terrorism, and other man-made disasters; and (2) interoperable emergency communica- tions capabilities among emergency response providers and relevant government officials, including by— (A) supporting research on a competitive basis, including through the Directorate of Science and Technology and Homeland Secu- rity Advanced Research Projects Agency; and (B) considering the establishment of a Cen- ter of Excellence under the Department of Homeland Security Centers of Excellence Program focused on improving emergency response providers’ communication capabili- ties. (b) Purposes The purposes of the program established under subsection (a) include— (1) supporting research, development, test- ing, and evaluation on emergency communica- tion capabilities; (2) understanding the strengths and weak- nesses of the public safety communications systems in use; (3) examining how current and emerging technology can make emergency response pro- viders more effective, and how Federal, State, local, and tribal government agencies can use this technology in a coherent and cost-effec- tive manner; (4) investigating technologies that could lead to long-term advancements in emergency communications capabilities and supporting research on advanced technologies and poten- tial systemic changes to dramatically improve emergency communications; and (5) evaluating and validating advanced tech- nology concepts, and facilitating the develop- ment and deployment of interoperable emer- gency communication capabilities. (c) Definitions For purposes of this section, the term ‘‘inter- operable’’, with respect to emergency commu- nications, has the meaning given the term in section 578 of this title. (Pub. L. 107–296, title III, § 315, as added Pub. L. 109–295, title VI, § 673(a), Oct. 4, 2006, 120 Stat. 1443.) § 195b. National Biosurveillance Integration Cen- ter (a) Establishment The Secretary, acting through the Assistant Secretary for the Countering Weapons of Mass Destruction Office, shall establish, operate, and maintain a National Biosurveillance Integration Center (referred to in this section as the ‘‘NBIC’’), which shall be headed by a Directing Officer, under an office or directorate of the De- partment that is in existence as of August 3, 2007. (b) Primary mission The primary mission of the NBIC is to— (1) enhance the capability of the Federal Government to— (A) rapidly identify, characterize, localize, and track a biological event of national con- cern by integrating and analyzing data re- lating to human health, animal, plant, food, and environmental monitoring systems (both national and international); and (B) disseminate alerts and other informa- tion to Member Agencies and, in coordina- tion with (and where possible through) Mem- ber Agencies, to agencies of State, local, and tribal governments, as appropriate, to en- hance the ability of such agencies to respond to a biological event of national concern; and (2) oversee development and operation of the National Biosurveillance Integration System. (c) Requirements The NBIC shall detect, as early as possible, a biological event of national concern that pre- sents a risk to the United States or the infra-

Cross-references

Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

6 U.S.C. § 101 — Cyber incident review

**(a) Activities** The Center shall— (1) receive, aggregate, analyze, and secure, using processes consistent with the processes developed pursuant to the Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act of 2015 ([6 U.S.C. 1501](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title6-section1501&num=0&edition=prelim) et seq.) reports from covered entities related to a covered cyber incident to assess the effectiveness of security controls, identify tactics, techniques, and procedures adversaries use to overcome those controls and other cybersecurity purposes, including to assess potential impact of cyber incidents on public health and safety and to enhance situational awareness of cyber threats across critical infrastructure sectors; (2) coordinate and share information with appropriate Federal departments and agencies to identify and track ransom payments, including those utilizing virtual currencies; (3) leverage information gathered about cyber incidents to— (A) enhance the quality and effectiveness of information sharing and coordination efforts with appropriate entities, including agencies, sector coordinating councils, Information Sharing and Analysis Organizations, State, local, Tribal, and territorial governments, technology providers, critical infrastructure owners and operators, cybersecurity and cyber incident response firms, and security researchers; and (B) provide appropriate entities, including sector coordinating councils, Information Sharing and Analysis Organizations, State, local, Tribal, and territorial governments, technology providers, cybersecurity and cyber incident response firms, and security researchers, with timely, actionable, and anonymized reports of cyber incident campaigns and trends, including, to the maximum extent practicable

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 6 U.S.C. § 101

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. The source passage cites 6 U.S.C. § 101. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

6 U.S.C. § 101 — Definitions

Page 6 TITLE 6—DOMESTIC SECURITY § 101 1 See References in Text note below. 2 So in original. A closing parenthesis probably should precede the period. Sec. 677f. Authorization of appropriations. 677g. Sunset. PART D—CYBER INCIDENT REPORTING 681. Definitions. 681a. Cyber incident review. 681b. Required reporting of certain cyber incidents. 681c. Voluntary reporting of other cyber incidents. 681d. Noncompliance with required reporting. 681e. Information shared with or provided to the Federal Government. 681f. Cyber Incident Reporting Council. 681g. Federal sharing of incident reports. § 101. Definitions In this chapter, the following definitions apply: (1) Each of the terms ‘‘American homeland’’ and ‘‘homeland’’ means the United States. (2) The term ‘‘appropriate congressional committee’’ means any committee of the House of Representatives or the Senate having legislative or oversight jurisdiction under the Rules of the House of Representatives or the Senate, respectively, over the matter con- cerned. (3) The term ‘‘assets’’ includes contracts, fa- cilities, property, records, unobligated or un- expended balances of appropriations, and other funds or resources (other than personnel). (4) The term ‘‘critical infrastructure’’ has the meaning given that term in section 5195c(e) of title 42. (5) The term ‘‘Department’’ means the De- partment of Homeland Security. (6) The term ‘‘emergency response pro- viders’’ includes Federal, State, and local gov- ernmental and nongovernmental emergency public safety, fire, law enforcement, emer- gency response, emergency medical (including hospital emergency facilities), and related per- sonnel, agencies, and authorities. (7) The term ‘‘EMP’’ means an electro- magnetic pulse caused by a nuclear

Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 6 U.S.C. § 101

Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. The source passage cites 6 U.S.C. § 101. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

6 U.S.C. § 194 — Homeland Security Advanced Research Projects Agency

**(a) Definitions** In this section: (1) **Fund** — The term “Fund” means the Acceleration Fund for Research and Development of Homeland Security Technologies established in subsection (c). (2) **Homeland security research** — The term “homeland security research” means research relevant to the detection of, prevention of, protection against, response to, attribution of, and recovery from homeland security threats, particularly acts of terrorism. (3) **HSARPA** — The term “HSARPA” means the Homeland Security Advanced Research Projects Agency established in subsection (b). (4) **Under Secretary** — The term “Under Secretary” means the Under Secretary for Science and Technology. **(b) Homeland Security Advanced Research Projects Agency** (1) **Establishment** — There is established the Homeland Security Advanced Research Projects Agency. (2) **Director** — HSARPA shall be headed by a Director, who shall be appointed by the Secretary. The Director shall report to the Under Secretary. (3) **Responsibilities** — The Director shall administer the Fund to award competitive, merit-reviewed grants, cooperative agreements or contracts to public or private entities, including businesses, federally funded research and development centers, and universities. The Director shall administer the Fund to— (A) support basic and applied homeland security research to promote revolutionary changes in technologies that would promote homeland security; (B) advance the development, testing and evaluation, and deployment of critical homeland security technologies; (C) accelerate the prototyping and deployment of technologies that would address homeland security vulnerabilities; and (D) conduct research and development for the purpose of advancing technology for the investigati

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 6 U.S.C. § 194

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. The source passage cites 6 U.S.C. § 194. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

6 U.S.C. § 194 — Enhancement of public safety communica-

Page 77 TITLE 6—DOMESTIC SECURITY § 194 text read as follows: ‘‘The Homeland Security Institute shall terminate 3 years after the effective date of this chapter.’’ § 193. Technology clearinghouse to encourage and support innovative solutions to enhance homeland security (a) Establishment of program The Secretary, acting through the Under Sec- retary for Science and Technology, shall estab- lish and promote a program to encourage tech- nological innovation in facilitating the mission of the Department (as described in section 111 of this title). (b) Elements of program The program described in subsection (a) shall include the following components: (1) The establishment of a centralized Fed- eral clearinghouse for information relating to technologies that would further the mission of the Department for dissemination, as appro- priate, to Federal, State, and local govern- ment and private sector entities for additional review, purchase, or use. (2) The issuance of announcements seeking unique and innovative technologies to advance the mission of the Department. (3) The establishment of a technical assist- ance team to assist in screening, as appro- priate, proposals submitted to the Secretary (except as provided in subsection (c)(2)) to as- sess the feasibility, scientific and technical merits, and estimated cost of such proposals, as appropriate. (4) The provision of guidance, recommenda- tions, and technical assistance, as appropriate, to assist Federal, State, and local government and private sector efforts to evaluate and im- plement the use of technologies described in paragraph (1) or (2). (5) The provision of information for persons seeking guidance on how to pursue proposals to develop or deploy technologies that would enhance homeland

Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 6 U.S.C. § 194

Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. The source passage cites 6 U.S.C. § 194. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

6 U.S.C. § 195 — Conduct of research, development, demonstration, testing and evaluation

**(a) In general** The Secretary, acting through the Under Secretary for Science and Technology, shall carry out the responsibilities under [section 182(4) of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title6-section182/4&num=0&edition=prelim) through both extramural and intramural programs. **(b) Extramural programs** (1) **In general** — The Secretary, acting through the Under Secretary for Science and Technology, shall operate extramural research, development, demonstration, testing, and evaluation programs so as to— (A) ensure that colleges, universities, private research institutes, and companies (and consortia thereof) from as many areas of the United States as practicable participate; (B) ensure that the research funded is of high quality, as determined through merit review processes developed under [section 182(14) of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title6-section182/14&num=0&edition=prelim); and (C) distribute funds through grants, cooperative agreements, and contracts. (2) **University-based centers for homeland security** (A) *Designation* — The Secretary, acting through the Under Secretary for Science and Technology, shall designate a university-based center or several university-based centers for homeland security. The purpose of the center or these centers shall be to establish a coordinated, university-based system to enhance the Nation’s homeland security. (B) *Criteria for designation* — Criteria for the designation of colleges or universities as a center for homeland security, shall include, but are not limited to, demonstrated expertise in— (i) The training of first responders. (ii) Responding to incidents involving weapons of mass destruction and biolog

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 6 U.S.C. § 195

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.