Browse Arkansas Code titles and sections
6 U.S.C. § 195 — Office for Interoperability and Compat-
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 81
TITLE 6—DOMESTIC SECURITY
§ 195
1 See Change of Name note below.
et, and the Department of State shall report to the
Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Trans-
portation and the House of Representatives Committee
on Energy and Commerce on—
‘‘(1) the status of the mechanism established by the
President under section 7303(c) of the Intelligence Re-
form and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 (6 U.S.C.
194(c)) for coordinating cross border interoperability
issues between—
‘‘(A) the United States and Canada; and
‘‘(B) the United States and Mexico;
‘‘(2) the status of treaty negotiations with Canada
and Mexico regarding the coordination of the re-
banding of 800 megahertz radios, as required under
the final rule of the Federal Communication Commis-
sion in the ‘Private Land Mobile Services; 800 MHz
Public Safety Interface Proceeding’ (WT Docket No.
02–55; ET Docket No. 00–258; ET Docket No. 95–18,
RM–9498; RM–10024; FCC 04–168) including the status
of any outstanding issues in the negotiations be-
tween—
‘‘(A) the United States and Canada; and
‘‘(B) the United States and Mexico;
‘‘(3) communications between the Commission and
the Department of State over possible amendments
to the bilateral legal agreements and protocols that
govern the coordination process for license applica-
tions seeking to use channels and frequencies above
Line A;
‘‘(4) the annual rejection rate for the last 5 years by
the United States of applications for new channels
and frequencies by Canadian private and public enti-
ties; and
‘‘(5) any additional procedures and mechanisms
that can be taken by the Commission to decrease the
rejection rate for applications by United States pri-
vate and public entities seeking licenses to use chan-
nels and frequencies above Li
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 6 U.S.C. § 195
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.
Original supplied file — preserved unchanged
Download original Markdown file
File SHA-256: 50153261a550af183482a21b10e69e623edf4bedec87de8bc423c66711efd441. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.
Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.
Open the recorded source website ↗
Record provenance
Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:usc2024-36a0586c44db42c4b6833902
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code-2024/title-6/section-195-office-for-interoperability-and-compat--3671dbc319.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: 03f91ea83e438faaed0868fab2c852a92ea0d384822f0e2b1ab25561d5cf2f98
Source location: USCODE-2024-title6-chap1-subchapIII-sec195.pdf
Stored source content
Page 81
TITLE 6—DOMESTIC SECURITY
§ 195
1 See Change of Name note below.
et, and the Department of State shall report to the
Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Trans-
portation and the House of Representatives Committee
on Energy and Commerce on—
‘‘(1) the status of the mechanism established by the
President under section 7303(c) of the Intelligence Re-
form and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 (6 U.S.C.
194(c)) for coordinating cross border interoperability
issues between—
‘‘(A) the United States and Canada; and
‘‘(B) the United States and Mexico;
‘‘(2) the status of treaty negotiations with Canada
and Mexico regarding the coordination of the re-
banding of 800 megahertz radios, as required under
the final rule of the Federal Communication Commis-
sion in the ‘Private Land Mobile Services; 800 MHz
Public Safety Interface Proceeding’ (WT Docket No.
02–55; ET Docket No. 00–258; ET Docket No. 95–18,
RM–9498; RM–10024; FCC 04–168) including the status
of any outstanding issues in the negotiations be-
tween—
‘‘(A) the United States and Canada; and
‘‘(B) the United States and Mexico;
‘‘(3) communications between the Commission and
the Department of State over possible amendments
to the bilateral legal agreements and protocols that
govern the coordination process for license applica-
tions seeking to use channels and frequencies above
Line A;
‘‘(4) the annual rejection rate for the last 5 years by
the United States of applications for new channels
and frequencies by Canadian private and public enti-
ties; and
‘‘(5) any additional procedures and mechanisms
that can be taken by the Commission to decrease the
rejection rate for applications by United States pri-
vate and public entities seeking licenses to use chan-
nels and frequencies above Line A.
‘‘(b) UPDATED REPORTS TO BE FILED ON THE STATUS OF
TREATY OF [SIC] NEGOTIATIONS.—The Federal Commu-
nications Commission, in conjunction with the Depart-
ment of Homeland Security, the Office of Management
of Budget, and the Department of State shall contin-
ually provide updated reports to the Committee on
Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate
and the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the
House of Representatives on the status of treaty nego-
tiations under subsection (a)(2) until the appropriate
United States treaty has been revised with each of—
‘‘(1) Canada; and
‘‘(2) Mexico.
‘‘(c) INTERNATIONAL NEGOTIATIONS TO REMEDY SITUA-
TION.—Not later than 90 days after the date of enact-
ment of this Act [Aug. 3, 2007], the Secretary of the De-
partment of State shall report to Congress on—
‘‘(1) the current process for considering applications
by Canada for frequencies and channels by United
States communities above Line A;
‘‘(2) the status of current negotiations to reform
and revise such process;
‘‘(3) the estimated date of conclusion for such nego-
tiations;
‘‘(4) whether the current process allows for auto-
matic denials or dismissals of initial applications by
the Government of Canada, and whether such denials
or dismissals are currently occurring; and
‘‘(5) communications between the Department of
State and the Federal Communications Commission
pursuant to subsection (a)(3).’’
SUBMISSION OF REPORTS TO APPROPRIATE
CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES
Pub. L. 110–53, title XXII, § 2205, Aug. 3, 2007, 121 Stat.
543, provided that: ‘‘In addition to the committees spe-
cifically enumerated to receive reports under this title
[enacting provisions set out as note under this section,
section 701 of this title, and section 247d–3a of Title 42,
The Public Health and Welfare, and amending provi-
sions set out as a note under section 309 of Title 47,
Telecommunications], any report transmitted under
the provisions of this title shall also be transmitted to
the appropriate congressional committees (as defined
in section 2(2) of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6
U.S.C. 101(2))).’’
REGIONAL MODEL STRATEGIC PLAN PILOT PROJECTS
Pub. L. 108–458, title VII, § 7304, Dec. 17, 2004, 118 Stat.
3847, directed the Secretary of Homeland Security, not
later than 90 days after Dec. 17, 2004, to establish not
fewer than 2 pilot projects in high threat urban areas
or regions likely to implement a national model stra-
tegic plan in order to develop a regional strategic plan
to foster interagency communication and coordinate
the gathering of all Federal, State, and local first re-
sponders in that area, consistent with the national
strategic plan developed by the Department of Home-
land Security, and to submit to Congress an interim re-
port regarding the progress of the interagency commu-
nications pilot projects 6 months after Dec. 17, 2004, and
a final report 18 months after Dec. 17, 2004.
§ 195. Office for Interoperability and Compat-
ibility
(a) Clarification of responsibilities
The Director of the Office for Interoperability
and Compatibility shall—
(1) assist the Secretary in developing and
implementing the science and technology as-
pects of the program described in subpara-
graphs (D), (E), (F), and (G) of section 194(a)(1)
of this title;
(2) in coordination with the Federal Commu-
nications Commission, the National Institute
of Standards and Technology, and other Fed-
eral departments and agencies with responsi-
bility for standards, support the creation of
national voluntary consensus standards for
interoperable emergency communications;
(3) establish a comprehensive research, de-
velopment, testing, and evaluation program
for improving interoperable emergency com-
munications;
(4) establish, in coordination with the Direc-
tor for Emergency Communications,1 require-
ments for interoperable emergency commu-
nications capabilities, which shall be non-
proprietary where standards for such capabili-
ties exist, for all public safety radio and data
communications systems and equipment pur-
chased using homeland security assistance ad-
ministered by the Department, excluding any
alert and warning device, technology, or sys-
tem;
(5) carry out the Department’s responsibil-
ities and authorities relating to research, de-
velopment, testing, evaluation, or standards-
related elements of the SAFECOM Program;
(6) evaluate and assess new technology in
real-world environments to achieve interoper-
able emergency communications capabilities;
(7) encourage more efficient use of existing
resources, including equipment, to achieve
interoperable emergency communications ca-
pabilities;
(8) test public safety communications sys-
tems that are less prone to failure, support
new nonvoice services, use spectrum more effi-
ciently, and cost less than existing systems;
(9) coordinate with the private sector to de-
velop solutions to improve emergency commu-
Page 82
TITLE 6—DOMESTIC SECURITY
§ 195a
nications capabilities and achieve interoper-
able emergency communications capabilities;
and
(10) conduct pilot projects, in coordination
with the Director for Emergency Communica-
tions,1 to test and demonstrate technologies,
including data and video, that enhance—
(A) the ability of emergency response pro-
viders and relevant government officials to
continue to communicate in the event of
natural disasters, acts of terrorism, and
other man-made disasters; and
(B) interoperable emergency communica-
tions capabilities.
(b) Coordination
The Director of the Office for Interoperability
and Compatibility shall coordinate with the Di-
rector for Emergency Communications 1 with re-
spect to the SAFECOM program.
(c) Sufficiency of resources
The Secretary shall provide the Office for
Interoperability
and
Compatibility
the
re-
sources and staff necessary to carry out the re-
sponsibilities under this section.
(Pub. L. 107–296, title III, § 314, as added Pub. L.
109–295, title VI, § 672(a), Oct. 4, 2006, 120 Stat.
1441.)
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
CHANGE OF NAME
Reference to Director for Emergency Communica-
tions deemed to be a reference to Assistant Director for
Emergency Communications, see section 2(c)(2) of Pub.
L. 115–278, set out as a note under section 571 of this
title.
§ 195a. Emergency communications interoper-
ability research and development
(a) In general
The Under Secretary for Science and Tech-
nology, acting through the Director of the Office
for Interoperability and Compatibility, shall es-
tablish a comprehensive research and develop-
ment program to support and promote—
(1) the ability of emergency response pro-
viders and relevant government officials to
continue to communicate in the event of nat-
ural disasters, acts of terrorism, and other
man-made disasters; and
(2) interoperable emergency communica-
tions capabilities among emergency response
providers and relevant government officials,
including by—
(A) supporting research on a competitive
basis, including through the Directorate of
Science and Technology and Homeland Secu-
rity Advanced Research Projects Agency;
and
(B) considering the establishment of a Cen-
ter of Excellence under the Department of
Homeland Security Centers of Excellence
Program focused on improving emergency
response providers’ communication capabili-
ties.
(b) Purposes
The purposes of the program established under
subsection (a) include—
(1) supporting research, development, test-
ing, and evaluation on emergency communica-
tion capabilities;
(2) understanding the strengths and weak-
nesses of the public safety communications
systems in use;
(3) examining how current and emerging
technology can make emergency response pro-
viders more effective, and how Federal, State,
local, and tribal government agencies can use
this technology in a coherent and cost-effec-
tive manner;
(4) investigating technologies that could
lead to long-term advancements in emergency
communications capabilities and supporting
research on advanced technologies and poten-
tial systemic changes to dramatically improve
emergency communications; and
(5) evaluating and validating advanced tech-
nology concepts, and facilitating the develop-
ment and deployment of interoperable emer-
gency communication capabilities.
(c) Definitions
For purposes of this section, the term ‘‘inter-
operable’’, with respect to emergency commu-
nications, has the meaning given the term in
section 578 of this title.
(Pub. L. 107–296, title III, § 315, as added Pub. L.
109–295, title VI, § 673(a), Oct. 4, 2006, 120 Stat.
1443.)
§ 195b. National Biosurveillance Integration Cen-
ter
(a) Establishment
The Secretary, acting through the Assistant
Secretary for the Countering Weapons of Mass
Destruction Office, shall establish, operate, and
maintain a National Biosurveillance Integration
Center (referred to in this section as the
‘‘NBIC’’), which shall be headed by a Directing
Officer, under an office or directorate of the De-
partment that is in existence as of August 3,
2007.
(b) Primary mission
The primary mission of the NBIC is to—
(1) enhance the capability of the Federal
Government to—
(A) rapidly identify, characterize, localize,
and track a biological event of national con-
cern by integrating and analyzing data re-
lating to human health, animal, plant, food,
and
environmental
monitoring
systems
(both national and international); and
(B) disseminate alerts and other informa-
tion to Member Agencies and, in coordina-
tion with (and where possible through) Mem-
ber Agencies, to agencies of State, local, and
tribal governments, as appropriate, to en-
hance the ability of such agencies to respond
to a biological event of national concern;
and
(2) oversee development and operation of the
National Biosurveillance Integration System.
(c) Requirements
The NBIC shall detect, as early as possible, a
biological event of national concern that pre-
sents a risk to the United States or the infra-
Cross-references
Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a) Activities** The Center shall—
(1) receive, aggregate, analyze, and secure, using processes consistent with the processes developed pursuant to the Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act of 2015 ([6 U.S.C. 1501](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title6-section1501&num=0&edition=prelim) et seq.) reports from covered entities related to a covered cyber incident to assess the effectiveness of security controls, identify tactics, techniques, and procedures adversaries use to overcome those controls and other cybersecurity purposes, including to assess potential impact of cyber incidents on public health and safety and to enhance situational awareness of cyber threats across critical infrastructure sectors;
(2) coordinate and share information with appropriate Federal departments and agencies to identify and track ransom payments, including those utilizing virtual currencies;
(3) leverage information gathered about cyber incidents to—
(A) enhance the quality and effectiveness of information sharing and coordination efforts with appropriate entities, including agencies, sector coordinating councils, Information Sharing and Analysis Organizations, State, local, Tribal, and territorial governments, technology providers, critical infrastructure owners and operators, cybersecurity and cyber incident response firms, and security researchers; and
(B) provide appropriate entities, including sector coordinating councils, Information Sharing and Analysis Organizations, State, local, Tribal, and territorial governments, technology providers, cybersecurity and cyber incident response firms, and security researchers, with timely, actionable, and anonymized reports of cyber incident campaigns and trends, including, to the maximum extent practicable
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 6 U.S.C. § 101
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. The source passage cites 6 U.S.C. § 101. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 6
TITLE 6—DOMESTIC SECURITY
§ 101
1 See References in Text note below.
2 So in original. A closing parenthesis probably should precede
the period.
Sec.
677f.
Authorization of appropriations.
677g.
Sunset.
PART D—CYBER INCIDENT REPORTING
681.
Definitions.
681a.
Cyber incident review.
681b.
Required reporting of certain cyber incidents.
681c.
Voluntary reporting of other cyber incidents.
681d.
Noncompliance with required reporting.
681e.
Information shared with or provided to the
Federal Government.
681f.
Cyber Incident Reporting Council.
681g.
Federal sharing of incident reports.
§ 101. Definitions
In this chapter, the following definitions
apply:
(1) Each of the terms ‘‘American homeland’’
and ‘‘homeland’’ means the United States.
(2) The term ‘‘appropriate congressional
committee’’ means any committee of the
House of Representatives or the Senate having
legislative or oversight jurisdiction under the
Rules of the House of Representatives or the
Senate, respectively, over the matter con-
cerned.
(3) The term ‘‘assets’’ includes contracts, fa-
cilities, property, records, unobligated or un-
expended balances of appropriations, and other
funds or resources (other than personnel).
(4) The term ‘‘critical infrastructure’’ has
the meaning given that term in section
5195c(e) of title 42.
(5) The term ‘‘Department’’ means the De-
partment of Homeland Security.
(6) The term ‘‘emergency response pro-
viders’’ includes Federal, State, and local gov-
ernmental and nongovernmental emergency
public safety, fire, law enforcement, emer-
gency response, emergency medical (including
hospital emergency facilities), and related per-
sonnel, agencies, and authorities.
(7) The term ‘‘EMP’’ means an electro-
magnetic pulse caused by a nuclear
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 6 U.S.C. § 101
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. The source passage cites 6 U.S.C. § 101. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a) Definitions** In this section:
(1) **Fund** — The term “Fund” means the Acceleration Fund for Research and Development of Homeland Security Technologies established in subsection (c).
(2) **Homeland security research** — The term “homeland security research” means research relevant to the detection of, prevention of, protection against, response to, attribution of, and recovery from homeland security threats, particularly acts of terrorism.
(3) **HSARPA** — The term “HSARPA” means the Homeland Security Advanced Research Projects Agency established in subsection (b).
(4) **Under Secretary** — The term “Under Secretary” means the Under Secretary for Science and Technology.
**(b) Homeland Security Advanced Research Projects Agency**
(1) **Establishment** — There is established the Homeland Security Advanced Research Projects Agency.
(2) **Director** — HSARPA shall be headed by a Director, who shall be appointed by the Secretary. The Director shall report to the Under Secretary.
(3) **Responsibilities** — The Director shall administer the Fund to award competitive, merit-reviewed grants, cooperative agreements or contracts to public or private entities, including businesses, federally funded research and development centers, and universities. The Director shall administer the Fund to—
(A) support basic and applied homeland security research to promote revolutionary changes in technologies that would promote homeland security;
(B) advance the development, testing and evaluation, and deployment of critical homeland security technologies;
(C) accelerate the prototyping and deployment of technologies that would address homeland security vulnerabilities; and
(D) conduct research and development for the purpose of advancing technology for the investigati
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 6 U.S.C. § 194
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. The source passage cites 6 U.S.C. § 194. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 77
TITLE 6—DOMESTIC SECURITY
§ 194
text read as follows: ‘‘The Homeland Security Institute
shall terminate 3 years after the effective date of this
chapter.’’
§ 193. Technology clearinghouse to encourage
and support innovative solutions to enhance
homeland security
(a) Establishment of program
The Secretary, acting through the Under Sec-
retary for Science and Technology, shall estab-
lish and promote a program to encourage tech-
nological innovation in facilitating the mission
of the Department (as described in section 111 of
this title).
(b) Elements of program
The program described in subsection (a) shall
include the following components:
(1) The establishment of a centralized Fed-
eral clearinghouse for information relating to
technologies that would further the mission of
the Department for dissemination, as appro-
priate, to Federal, State, and local govern-
ment and private sector entities for additional
review, purchase, or use.
(2) The issuance of announcements seeking
unique and innovative technologies to advance
the mission of the Department.
(3) The establishment of a technical assist-
ance team to assist in screening, as appro-
priate, proposals submitted to the Secretary
(except as provided in subsection (c)(2)) to as-
sess the feasibility, scientific and technical
merits, and estimated cost of such proposals,
as appropriate.
(4) The provision of guidance, recommenda-
tions, and technical assistance, as appropriate,
to assist Federal, State, and local government
and private sector efforts to evaluate and im-
plement the use of technologies described in
paragraph (1) or (2).
(5) The provision of information for persons
seeking guidance on how to pursue proposals
to develop or deploy technologies that would
enhance homeland
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 6 U.S.C. § 194
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. The source passage cites 6 U.S.C. § 194. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a) In general** The Secretary, acting through the Under Secretary for Science and Technology, shall carry out the responsibilities under [section 182(4) of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title6-section182/4&num=0&edition=prelim) through both extramural and intramural programs.
**(b) Extramural programs**
(1) **In general** — The Secretary, acting through the Under Secretary for Science and Technology, shall operate extramural research, development, demonstration, testing, and evaluation programs so as to—
(A) ensure that colleges, universities, private research institutes, and companies (and consortia thereof) from as many areas of the United States as practicable participate;
(B) ensure that the research funded is of high quality, as determined through merit review processes developed under [section 182(14) of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title6-section182/14&num=0&edition=prelim); and
(C) distribute funds through grants, cooperative agreements, and contracts.
(2) **University-based centers for homeland security**
(A) *Designation* — The Secretary, acting through the Under Secretary for Science and Technology, shall designate a university-based center or several university-based centers for homeland security. The purpose of the center or these centers shall be to establish a coordinated, university-based system to enhance the Nation’s homeland security.
(B) *Criteria for designation* — Criteria for the designation of colleges or universities as a center for homeland security, shall include, but are not limited to, demonstrated expertise in—
(i) The training of first responders.
(ii) Responding to incidents involving weapons of mass destruction and biolog
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 6 U.S.C. § 195
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.