Browse Arkansas Code titles and sections
28 U.S.C. § 2074 — Rules of procedure and evidence; submis-
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 505
TITLE 28—JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE
§ 2074
the Judicial Conference of the United States shall pre-
scribe in accordance with rule 9009 of the Federal Rules
of Bankruptcy Procedure [11 U.S.C. App.] official stand-
ard form disclosure statements and plans of reorganiza-
tion for small business debtors (as defined in section 101
of title 11, United States Code, as amended by this Act),
designed to achieve a practical balance between—
‘‘(1) the reasonable needs of the courts, the United
States trustee, creditors, and other parties in inter-
est for reasonably complete information; and
‘‘(2) economy and simplicity for debtors.’’
UNIFORM REPORTING RULES AND FORMS FOR SMALL
BUSINESS CASES
Pub. L. 109–8, title IV, § 435, Apr. 20, 2005, 119 Stat. 111,
provided that:
‘‘(a) PROPOSAL OF RULES AND FORMS.—The Judicial
Conference of the United States shall propose in ac-
cordance with section 2073 of title 28 of the United
States Code amended Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Pro-
cedure, and shall prescribe in accordance with rule 9009
of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure [11
U.S.C. App.] official bankruptcy forms, directing small
business debtors to file periodic financial and other re-
ports containing information, including information
relating to—
‘‘(1) the debtor’s profitability;
‘‘(2) the debtor’s cash receipts and disbursements;
and
‘‘(3) whether the debtor is timely filing tax returns
and paying taxes and other administrative expenses
when due.
‘‘(b) PURPOSE.—The rules and forms proposed under
subsection (a) shall be designed to achieve a practical
balance among—
‘‘(1) the reasonable needs of the bankruptcy court,
the United States trustee, creditors, and other par-
ties in interest for reasonably complete information;
‘‘(2) a small b
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 28 U.S.C. § 2074
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.
Original supplied file — preserved unchanged
Download original Markdown file
File SHA-256: f5aaa5e1db3a9990da99926305c691879af6873a00d9d49c161b9e63d99aed05. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.
Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.
Open the recorded source website ↗
Record provenance
Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:usc2024-31ac449b73bd88b4ba89a94e
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code-2024/title-28/section-2074-rules-of-procedure-and-evidence-submis--7d07e2c85a.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: 7437368a330c9f3640b2c2859fa18cf05e206547cf4145b5f8a52884e547bac9
Source location: USCODE-2024-title28-partV-chap131-sec2074.pdf
Stored source content
Page 505
TITLE 28—JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE
§ 2074
the Judicial Conference of the United States shall pre-
scribe in accordance with rule 9009 of the Federal Rules
of Bankruptcy Procedure [11 U.S.C. App.] official stand-
ard form disclosure statements and plans of reorganiza-
tion for small business debtors (as defined in section 101
of title 11, United States Code, as amended by this Act),
designed to achieve a practical balance between—
‘‘(1) the reasonable needs of the courts, the United
States trustee, creditors, and other parties in inter-
est for reasonably complete information; and
‘‘(2) economy and simplicity for debtors.’’
UNIFORM REPORTING RULES AND FORMS FOR SMALL
BUSINESS CASES
Pub. L. 109–8, title IV, § 435, Apr. 20, 2005, 119 Stat. 111,
provided that:
‘‘(a) PROPOSAL OF RULES AND FORMS.—The Judicial
Conference of the United States shall propose in ac-
cordance with section 2073 of title 28 of the United
States Code amended Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Pro-
cedure, and shall prescribe in accordance with rule 9009
of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure [11
U.S.C. App.] official bankruptcy forms, directing small
business debtors to file periodic financial and other re-
ports containing information, including information
relating to—
‘‘(1) the debtor’s profitability;
‘‘(2) the debtor’s cash receipts and disbursements;
and
‘‘(3) whether the debtor is timely filing tax returns
and paying taxes and other administrative expenses
when due.
‘‘(b) PURPOSE.—The rules and forms proposed under
subsection (a) shall be designed to achieve a practical
balance among—
‘‘(1) the reasonable needs of the bankruptcy court,
the United States trustee, creditors, and other par-
ties in interest for reasonably complete information;
‘‘(2) a small business debtor’s interest that required
reports be easy and inexpensive to complete; and
‘‘(3) the interest of all parties that the required re-
ports help such debtor to understand such debtor’s fi-
nancial condition and plan the [sic] such debtor’s fu-
ture.’’
§ 2074. Rules of procedure and evidence; submis-
sion to Congress; effective date
(a) The Supreme Court shall transmit to the
Congress not later than May 1 of the year in
which a rule prescribed under section 2072 is to
become effective a copy of the proposed rule.
Such rule shall take effect no earlier than De-
cember 1 of the year in which such rule is so
transmitted unless otherwise provided by law.
The Supreme Court may fix the extent such rule
shall apply to proceedings then pending, except
that the Supreme Court shall not require the ap-
plication of such rule to further proceedings
then pending to the extent that, in the opinion
of the court in which such proceedings are pend-
ing, the application of such rule in such pro-
ceedings would not be feasible or would work in-
justice, in which event the former rule applies.
(b) Any such rule creating, abolishing, or
modifying an evidentiary privilege shall have no
force or effect unless approved by Act of Con-
gress.
(Added Pub. L. 100–702, title IV, § 401(a), Nov. 19,
1988, 102 Stat. 4649.)
Editorial Notes
PRIOR PROVISIONS
A prior section 2074, act July 27, 1954, ch. 583, § 1, 68
Stat. 567, empowered the Supreme Court to prescribe
rules for review of decisions of the Tax Court of the
United States, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 89–773, § 2, Nov.
6, 1966, 80 Stat. 1323.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
EFFECTIVE DATE
Section effective Dec. 1, 1988, see section 407 of Pub.
L. 100–702, set out as an Effective Date of 1988 Amend-
ment note under section 2071 of this title.
AMENDMENT TO RULE 23 OF FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL
PROCEDURE; EFFECTIVE DATE
Pub. L. 109–2, § 7, Feb. 18, 2005, 119 Stat. 13, provided
that: ‘‘Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the
amendments to rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure, which are set forth in the order entered by
the Supreme Court of the United States on March 27,
2003, shall take effect on the date of enactment of this
Act [Feb. 18, 2005] or on December 1, 2003 (as specified
in that order), whichever occurs first.’’
MODIFICATION OF AMENDMENTS TO FEDERAL RULES OF
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE PROPOSED APRIL 29, 2002; EF-
FECTIVE DATE
Pub. L. 107–273, div. C, title I, § 11019(a), Nov. 2, 2002,
116 Stat. 1825, provided that: ‘‘The proposed amend-
ments to the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure that
are embraced by an order entered by the Supreme
Court of the United States on April 29, 2002, shall take
effect on December 1, 2002, as otherwise provided by
law, but with the amendments made in subsection (b)
[amending Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Criminal
Procedure].’’
MODIFICATION OF AMENDMENTS TO FEDERAL RULES OF
EVIDENCE PROPOSED APRIL 29, 1994; EFFECTIVE DATE
Pub. L. 103–322, title IV, § 40141, Sept. 13, 1994, 108
Stat. 1918, provided that:
‘‘(a) MODIFICATION
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENT.—The
proposed amendments to the Federal Rules of Evidence
that are embraced by an order entered by the Supreme
Court of the United States on April 29, 1994, shall take
effect on December 1, 1994, as otherwise provided by
law, but with the amendment made by subsection (b).
‘‘(b) RULE.—[Amended Rule 412 of the Federal Rules
of Evidence.]
‘‘(c) TECHNICAL AMENDMENT.—[Amended table of con-
tents for the Federal Rules of Evidence.]’’
MODIFICATION OF AMENDMENTS TO FEDERAL RULES OF
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE PROPOSED APRIL 29, 1994; EF-
FECTIVE DATE
Pub. L. 103–322, title XXIII, § 230101, Sept. 13, 1994, 108
Stat. 2077, provided that:
‘‘(a) MODIFICATION
OF PROPOSED AMENDMENTS.—The
proposed amendments to the Federal Rules of Criminal
Procedure which are embraced by an order entered by
the Supreme Court of the United States on April 29,
1994, shall take effect on December 1, 1994, as otherwise
provided by law, but with the following amendments:
‘‘(b) IN GENERAL.—[Amended Rule 32 of the Federal
Rules of Criminal Procedure.]
‘‘(c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by sub-
section (b) shall become effective on December 1, 1994.’’
AMENDMENTS TO CIVIL RULES PROPOSED APRIL 30, 1991
Pub. L. 102–198, § 11, Dec. 9, 1991, 105 Stat. 1626, pro-
vided that:
‘‘(a) TECHNICAL AMENDMENT.—Rule 15(c)(3) of the Fed-
eral Rules of Civil Procedure for the United States
Courts, as transmitted to the Congress by the Supreme
Court pursuant to section 2074 of title 28, United States
Code, to become effective on December 1, 1991, is
amended by striking ‘Rule 4(m)’ and inserting ‘Rule
4(j)’.
‘‘(b) AMENDMENT
TO FORMS.—Form 1–A, Notice of
Lawsuit and Request for Waiver of Service of Sum-
Page 506
TITLE 28—JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE
§ 2074
mons, and Form 1–B, Waiver of Service of Summons,
included in the transmittal by the Supreme Court de-
scribed in subsection (a), shall not be effective and
Form 18–A, Notice and Acknowledgment for Service by
Mail, abrogated by the Supreme Court in such trans-
mittal, effective December 1, 1991, shall continue in ef-
fect on or after that date.’’
AMENDMENTS TO CIVIL RULES PROPOSED APRIL 28, 1982
Pub. L. 97–462, § 5, Jan. 12, 1983, 96 Stat. 2530, provided
that: ‘‘The amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure [Rule 4], the effective date of which was de-
layed by the Act entitled ‘An Act to delay the effective
date of proposed amendments to rule 4 of the Federal
Rules of Civil Procedure’, approved August 2, 1982 (96
Stat. 246) [Pub. L. 97–227, see below], shall not take ef-
fect.’’
Pub. L. 97–227, Aug. 2, 1982, 96 Stat. 246, provided:
‘‘That notwithstanding the provisions of section 2072 of
title 28, United States Code, the amendments to rule 4
of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure as proposed by
the Supreme Court of the United States and trans-
mitted to the Congress by the Chief Justice on April 28,
1982, shall take effect on October 1, 1983, unless pre-
viously approved, disapproved, or modified by Act of
Congress.
‘‘SEC. 2. This Act shall be effective as of August 1,
1982, but shall not apply to the service of process that
takes place between August 1, 1982, and the date of en-
actment of this Act [Aug. 2, 1982].’’
AMENDMENTS TO CRIMINAL RULES AND RULES OF EVI-
DENCE PROPOSED APRIL 30, 1979; POSTPONEMENT
OF
EFFECTIVE DATE
Pub. L. 96–42, July 31, 1979, 93 Stat. 326, provided:
‘‘That notwithstanding any provision of section 3771 or
3772 of title 18 of the United States Code or of section
2072, 2075, or 2076 of title 28 of the United States Code
to the contrary—
‘‘(1) the amendments proposed by the United States
Supreme Court and transmitted by the Chief Justice
on April 30, 1979, to the Federal Rules of Criminal
Procedure affecting rules 11(e)(6), 17(h), 32(f), and
44(c), and adding new rules 26.2 and 32.1, and the
amendment so proposed and transmitted to the Fed-
eral Rules of Evidence affecting rule 410, shall not
take effect until December 1, 1980, or until and then
only to the extent approved by Act of Congress,
whichever is earlier; and
‘‘(2) the amendment proposed by the United States
Supreme Court and transmitted by the Chief Justice
on April 30, 1979, affecting rule 40 of the Federal Rules
of Criminal Procedure shall take effect on August 1,
1979, with the following amendments:
‘‘(A) In the matter designated as paragraph (1) of
subdivision (d), strike out ‘in accordance with Rule
32.1(a)’.
‘‘(B) In the matter designated as paragraph (2) of
subdivision (d), strike out ‘in accordance with Rule
32.1(a)(1)’.’’
APPROVAL AND EFFECTIVE DATE OF AMENDMENTS
PROPOSED APRIL 26, 1976
Pub. L. 95–78, § 1, July 30, 1977, 91 Stat. 319, provided:
‘‘That notwithstanding the first section of the Act en-
titled ‘An Act to delay the effective date of certain pro-
posed amendments to the Federal Rules of Criminal
Procedure and certain other rules promulgated by the
United States Supreme Court’ (Public Law 94–349, ap-
proved July 8, 1976) [90 Stat. 822] the amendments to
rules 6(e), 23, 24, 40.1, and 41(c)(2) of the Rules of Crimi-
nal Procedure for the United States district courts [set
out in the Appendix to Title 18, Crimes and Criminal
Procedure] which are embraced by the order entered by
the United States Supreme Court on April 26, 1976, shall
take effect only as provided in this Act [see section 4
of Pub. L. 95–78, set out below].’’
EFFECTIVE DATE OF PUB. L. 95–78
Pub. L. 95–78, § 4, July 30, 1977, 91 Stat. 322, provided
that:
‘‘(a) The first section of this Act [set out as a note
above] shall take effect on the date of the enactment of
this Act [July 30, 1977].
‘‘(b) Sections 2 and 3 of this Act [which amended sec-
tion 1446 of this title, approved proposed amendment of
rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure,
modified and approved proposed amendment of rules 6
and 41 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and
disapproved the proposed amendment of rule 24 of the
Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure and the proposed
addition of rule 40.1 of the Federal Rules of Criminal
Procedure] shall take effect October 1, 1977.’’
APPROVAL AND EFFECTIVE DATE OF RULES GOVERNING
SECTION 2254 CASES
AND SECTION 2255 PROCEEDINGS
FOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTS
Pub. L. 94–426, § 1, Sept. 28, 1976, 90 Stat. 1334, pro-
vided: ‘‘That the rules governing section 2254 cases in
the United States district courts and the rules gov-
erning section 2255 proceedings for the United States
district courts, as proposed by the United States Su-
preme Court, which were delayed by the Act entitled
‘An Act to delay the effective date of certain proposed
amendments to the Federal Rules of Criminal Proce-
dure and certain other rules promulgated by the United
States Supreme Court’ (Public Law 94–349), are ap-
proved with the amendments set forth in section 2 of
this Act and shall take effect as so amended, with re-
spect to petitions under section 2254 and motions under
section 2255 of title 28 of the United States Code filed
on or after February 1, 1977.’’
AMENDMENTS
TO
CRIMINAL
RULES
UNDER
SUPREME
COURT ORDER
OF APRIL 26, 1976; POSTPONEMENT
OF
EFFECTIVE DATE
Pub. L. 94–349, § 1, July 8, 1976, 90 Stat. 822, provided:
‘‘That, notwithstanding the provisions of sections 3771
and 3772 of title 18 of the United States Code the
amendments to rules 6(e), 23, 24, 40.1 and 41(c)(2) of the
Rules of Criminal Procedure for the United States dis-
trict courts which are embraced by the order entered
by the United States Supreme Court on April 26, 1976,
and which were transmitted to the Congress on or
about April 26, 1976, shall not take effect until August
1, 1977, or until and to the extent approved by Act of
Congress, whichever is earlier. The remainder of the
proposed amendments to the Federal Rules of Criminal
Procedure [rules 6(f), 41(a), (c)(1), and 50(b)] shall be-
come effective August 1, 1976, pursuant to law.’’
POSTPONEMENT
OF
EFFECTIVE
DATE
OF
PROPOSED
RULES
AND FORMS GOVERNING PROCEEDINGS UNDER
SECTIONS 2254 AND 2255 OF THIS TITLE
Pub. L. 94–349, § 2, July 8, 1976, 90 Stat. 822, provided:
‘‘That, notwithstanding the provisions of section 2072
of title 28 of the United States Code, the rules and
forms governing section 2254 [section 2254 of this title]
cases in the United States district courts and the rules
and forms governing section 2255 [section 2255 of this
title] proceedings in the United States district courts
which are embraced by the order entered by the United
States Supreme Court on April 26, 1976, and which were
transmitted to the Congress on or about April 26, 1976,
shall not take effect until thirty days after the ad-
journment sine die of the 94th Congress, or until and to
the extent approved by Act of Congress, whichever is
earlier.’’
APPROVAL AND EFFECTIVE DATE OF AMENDMENTS
PROPOSED APRIL 22, 1974
Pub. L. 94–64, § 2, July 31, 1975, 89 Stat. 370, provided
that: ‘‘The amendments proposed by the United States
Supreme Court to the Federal Rules of Criminal Proce-
dure [adding rules 12.1, 12.2, and 29.1 and amending rules
4, 9(a), 11, 12, 15, 16, 17(f), 20, 32(a), (c), and (e), and 43]
which are embraced in the order of that Court on April
22, 1974, are approved except as otherwise provided in
this Act [making further amendments to rules 4, 9(a),
11, 12, 12.1, 12.2, 15, 16, 17(f), 20, 32(a), (c), and (e), and 43]
Page 507
TITLE 28—JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE
[§ 2076
and shall take effect on December 1, 1975. Except with
respect to the amendment to Rule 11, insofar as it adds
Rule 11(e)(6), which shall take effect on August 1, 1975,
the amendments made by section 3 of this Act shall
also take effect on December 1, 1975.’’
APPROVAL AND EFFECTIVE DATE OF AMENDMENTS
PROPOSED NOVEMBER 20, 1972 AND DECEMBER 18, 1972
Pub. L. 93–595, § 3, Jan. 2, 1975, 88 Stat. 1949, provided
that: ‘‘The Congress expressly approves the amend-
ments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure [Rules
30(c), 32(c), 43, and 44.1] and the amendments to the
Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure [Rules 26, 26.1, and
28], which are embraced by the orders entered by the
Supreme Court of the United States on November 20,
1972, and December 18, 1972, and such amendments shall
take effect on the one hundred and eightieth day begin-
ning after the date of the enactment of this Act [Jan.
2, 1975].’’
AMENDMENTS
TO
CRIMINAL
RULES
UNDER
SUPREME
COURT ORDER
OF APRIL 22, 1974; POSTPONEMENT
OF
EFFECTIVE DATE UNTIL AUGUST 1, 1975
Pub. L. 93–361, July 30, 1974, 88 Stat. 397, provided:
‘‘That, notwithstanding the provisions of sections 3771
and 3772 of title 18 of the United States Code, the effec-
tive date of the proposed amendments to the Federal
Rules of Criminal Procedure which are embraced by the
order entered by the United States Supreme Court on
April 22, 1974, and which were transmitted to the Con-
gress by the Chief Justice on April 22, 1974, is postponed
until August 1, 1975.’’
CONGRESSIONAL
APPROVAL
REQUIREMENT
FOR
PRO-
POSED
RULES
OF
EVIDENCE
FOR
UNITED
STATES
COURTS
AND
AMENDMENTS
TO
FEDERAL
RULES
OF
CIVIL PROCEDURE AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE; SUSPEN-
SION OF EFFECTIVENESS OF SUCH RULES
Pub. L. 93–12, Mar. 30, 1973, 87 Stat. 9, provided: ‘‘That
notwithstanding any other provisions of law, the Rules
of Evidence for United States Courts and Magistrates,
the Amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Proce-
dure, and the Amendments to the Federal Rules of
Criminal Procedure, which are embraced by the orders
entered by the Supreme Court of the United States on
Monday, November 20, 1972, and Monday, December 18,
1972, shall have no force or effect except to the extent,
and with such amendments, as they may be expressly
approved by the Act of Congress.’’
§ 2075. Bankruptcy rules
The Supreme Court shall have the power to
prescribe by general rules, the forms of process,
writs, pleadings, and motions, and the practice
and procedure in cases under title 11.
Such rules shall not abridge, enlarge, or mod-
ify any substantive right.
The Supreme Court shall transmit to Congress
not later than May 1 of the year in which a rule
prescribed under this section is to become effec-
tive a copy of the proposed rule. The rule shall
take effect no earlier than December 1 of the
year in which it is transmitted to Congress un-
less otherwise provided by law.
The bankruptcy rules promulgated under this
section shall prescribe a form for the statement
required under section 707(b)(2)(C) of title 11 and
may provide general rules on the content of
such statement.
(Added Pub. L. 88–623, § 1, Oct. 3, 1964, 78 Stat.
1001; amended Pub. L. 95–598, title II, § 247, Nov.
6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2672; Pub. L. 103–394, title I,
§ 104(f), Oct. 22, 1994, 108 Stat. 4110; Pub. L. 109–8,
title XII, § 1232, Apr. 20, 2005, 119 Stat. 202.)
Editorial Notes
AMENDMENTS
2005—Pub. L. 109–8 inserted at end ‘‘The bankruptcy
rules promulgated under this section shall prescribe a
form
for
the
statement
required
under
section
707(b)(2)(C) of title 11 and may provide general rules on
the content of such statement.’’
1994—Pub. L. 103–394 amended third par. generally.
Prior to amendment, third par. read as follows: ‘‘Such
rules shall not take effect until they have been re-
ported to Congress by the Chief Justice at or after the
beginning of a regular session thereof but not later
than the first day of May and until the expiration of
ninety days after they have been thus reported.’’
1978—Pub. L. 95–598 substituted ‘‘in cases under title
11’’ for ‘‘under the Bankruptcy Act’’ and struck out
provisions directing that all laws in conflict with bank-
ruptcy rules be of no further force or effect after such
rules have taken effect.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 2005 AMENDMENT
Amendment by Pub. L. 109–8 effective 180 days after
Apr. 20, 2005, and not applicable with respect to cases
commenced under Title 11, Bankruptcy, before such ef-
fective date, except as otherwise provided, see section
1501 of Pub. L. 109–8, set out as a note under section 101
of Title 11.
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1994 AMENDMENT
Amendment by Pub. L. 103–394 effective Oct. 22, 1994,
and not applicable with respect to cases commenced
under Title 11, Bankruptcy, before Oct. 22, 1994, see sec-
tion 702 of Pub. L. 103–394, set out as a note under sec-
tion 101 of Title 11.
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1978 AMENDMENT
Amendment by Pub. L. 95–598 effective Nov. 6, 1978,
see section 402(d) of Pub. L. 95–598, set out as an Effec-
tive Date note preceding section 101 of Title 11, Bank-
ruptcy.
RULES PROMULGATED BY SUPREME COURT
Pub. L. 98–353, title III, § 320, July 10, 1984, 98 Stat. 357,
provided that: ‘‘The Supreme Court shall prescribe gen-
eral rules implementing the practice and procedure to
be followed under section 707(b) of title 11, United
States Code. Section 2075 of title 28, United States
Code, shall apply with respect to the general rules pre-
scribed under this section.’’
APPLICABILITY OF RULES TO CASES UNDER TITLE 11
Pub. L. 95–598, title IV, § 405(d), Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat.
2685, provided that: ‘‘The rules prescribed under section
2075 of title 28 of the United States Code and in effect
on September 30, 1979, shall apply to cases under title
11, to the extent not inconsistent with the amendments
made by this Act, or with this Act [see Tables for com-
plete classification of Pub. L. 95–598], until such rules
are repealed or superseded by rules prescribed and ef-
fective under such section, as amended by section 248
[247] of this Act.’’
ADDITIONAL RULEMAKING POWER
Pub. L. 95–598, title IV, § 410, Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2687,
provided that: ‘‘The Supreme Court may issue such ad-
ditional rules of procedure, consistent with Acts of
Congress, as may be necessary for the orderly transfer
of functions and records and the orderly transition to
the new bankruptcy court system created by this Act
[see Tables for complete classification of Pub. L.
95–598].’’
[§ 2076. Repealed. Pub. L. 100–702, title IV,
§ 401(c), Nov. 19, 1988, 102 Stat. 4650]
Section, added Pub. L. 93–595, § 2(a)(1), Jan. 2, 1975, 88
Stat. 1948; amended Pub. L. 94–149, § 2, Dec. 12, 1975, 89
Cross-references
Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a)** The Supreme Court shall transmit to the Congress not later than May 1 of the year in which a rule prescribed under section 2072 is to become effective a copy of the proposed rule. Such rule shall take effect no earlier than December 1 of the year in which such rule is so transmitted unless otherwise provided by law. The Supreme Court may fix the extent such rule shall apply to proceedings then pending, except that the Supreme Court shall not require the application of such rule to further proceedings then pending to the extent that, in the opinion of the court in which such proceedings are pending, the application of such rule in such proceedings would not be feasible or would work injustice, in which event the former rule applies.
**(b)** Any such rule creating, abolishing, or modifying an evidentiary privilege shall have no force or effect unless approved by Act of Congress.
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 28 U.S.C. § 2074
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.