Arkansas Legal Resource Navigator

15 U.S.C. § 1693q — Relation to State laws

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

15 U.S.C. § 1693q — Relation to State laws

Page 1666 TITLE 15—COMMERCE AND TRADE § 1693q 5301 of Title 12, Banks and Banking, which provided that the renumbering by Pub. L. 111–24 was effective 15 months after May 22, 2009, and the renumberings by Pub. L. 111–203 were effective 1 day after July 21, 2010. PRIOR PROVISIONS Two prior sections 921 of Pub. L. 90–321 were renum- bered section 922 and are classified to sections 1693q and 1693r of this title. Another prior section 921 of Pub. L. 90–321 was renum- bered section 923 and is classified as an Effective Date note under section 1693 of this title. AMENDMENTS 2010—Pub. L. 111–203, § 1084(1), substituted ‘‘Bureau’’ for ‘‘Board’’ wherever appearing. 1982—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 97–375 struck out require- ment that the Attorney General make a report on the same terms as the Board, and that such report also con- tain an analysis of the impact of this subchapter on the operation, workload, and efficiency of the Federal courts, and substituted ‘‘necessary and appropriate’’ for ‘‘necessary or appropriate’’. Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries EFFECTIVE DATE OF 2010 AMENDMENT Amendment by section 1084(1) of Pub. L. 111–203 effec- tive on the designated transfer date, see section 1100H of Pub. L. 111–203, set out as a note under section 552a of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees. § 1693q. Relation to State laws This subchapter does not annul, alter, or af- fect the laws of any State relating to electronic fund transfers, dormancy fees, inactivity charges or fees, service fees, or expiration dates of gift certificates, store gift cards, or general- use prepaid cards, except to the extent that those laws are inconsistent with the provisions of this subchapter, and then only to the extent of the inconsistency. A State law is n

Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 15 U.S.C. § 1693q

Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.

Original supplied file — preserved unchanged

Download original Markdown file

File SHA-256: 6ca98583a1f0988933823d036155a4b41f20a3f6570b225a0ff811df9af81152. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.

Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.

Open the recorded source website ↗

Record provenance

Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:usc2024-2cc908b6ab4b5e34a5efa6a4
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code-2024/title-15/section-1693q-relation-to-state-laws--188e6c90ed.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: 2907421e153d6de79d2f5856ff0ee10eb1202eae4d0697657277a103f2857979

Source location: USCODE-2024-title15-chap41-subchapVI-sec1693q.pdf

Stored source content

Page 1666 TITLE 15—COMMERCE AND TRADE § 1693q 5301 of Title 12, Banks and Banking, which provided that the renumbering by Pub. L. 111–24 was effective 15 months after May 22, 2009, and the renumberings by Pub. L. 111–203 were effective 1 day after July 21, 2010. PRIOR PROVISIONS Two prior sections 921 of Pub. L. 90–321 were renum- bered section 922 and are classified to sections 1693q and 1693r of this title. Another prior section 921 of Pub. L. 90–321 was renum- bered section 923 and is classified as an Effective Date note under section 1693 of this title. AMENDMENTS 2010—Pub. L. 111–203, § 1084(1), substituted ‘‘Bureau’’ for ‘‘Board’’ wherever appearing. 1982—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 97–375 struck out require- ment that the Attorney General make a report on the same terms as the Board, and that such report also con- tain an analysis of the impact of this subchapter on the operation, workload, and efficiency of the Federal courts, and substituted ‘‘necessary and appropriate’’ for ‘‘necessary or appropriate’’. Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries EFFECTIVE DATE OF 2010 AMENDMENT Amendment by section 1084(1) of Pub. L. 111–203 effec- tive on the designated transfer date, see section 1100H of Pub. L. 111–203, set out as a note under section 552a of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees. § 1693q. Relation to State laws This subchapter does not annul, alter, or af- fect the laws of any State relating to electronic fund transfers, dormancy fees, inactivity charges or fees, service fees, or expiration dates of gift certificates, store gift cards, or general- use prepaid cards, except to the extent that those laws are inconsistent with the provisions of this subchapter, and then only to the extent of the inconsistency. A State law is not incon- sistent with this subchapter if the protection such law affords any consumer is greater than the protection afforded by this subchapter. The Bureau shall, upon its own motion or upon the request of any financial institution, State, or other interested party, submitted in accordance with procedures prescribed in regulations of the Bureau, determine whether a State requirement is inconsistent or affords greater protection. If the Bureau determines that a State requirement is inconsistent, financial institutions shall incur no liability under the law of that State for a good faith failure to comply with that law, not- withstanding that such determination is subse- quently amended, rescinded, or determined by judicial or other authority to be invalid for any reason. This subchapter does not extend the ap- plicability of any such law to any class of per- sons or transactions to which it would not oth- erwise apply. (Pub. L. 90–321, title IX, § 922, formerly § 919, as added Pub. L. 95–630, title XX, § 2001, Nov. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 3741; renumbered § 920 and amended Pub. L. 111–24, title IV, §§ 401(1), 402, May 22, 2009, 123 Stat. 1751, 1754; renumbered § 921, renumbered § 922, and amended Pub. L. 111–203, title X, §§ 1073(a)(3), 1075(a)(1), 1084(1), July 21, 2010, 124 Stat. 2060, 2068, 2081.) Editorial Notes CODIFICATION Another section 922 of Pub. L. 90–321 is classified to section 1693r of this title. Renumbering of section 919 of Pub. L. 90–321 as sec- tion 920 by section 401(1) of Pub. L. 111–24 was executed prior to the renumberings of section 920 of Pub. L. 90–321 as section 921 and then as section 922 by sections 1073(a)(3) and 1075(a)(1) of Pub. L. 111–203 as the prob- able intent of Congress, notwithstanding section 403 of Pub. L. 111–24, set out as an Effective Date note under section 1693l–1 of this title and section 4 of Pub. L. 111–203, set out as an Effective Date note under section 5301 of Title 12, Banks and Banking, which provided that the renumbering by Pub. L. 111–24 was effective 15 months after May 22, 2009, and the renumberings by Pub. L. 111–203 were effective 1 day after July 21, 2010. PRIOR PROVISIONS A prior section 922 of Pub. L. 90–321 was renumbered section 923 and is classified as an Effective Date note under section 1693 of this title. AMENDMENTS 2010—Pub. L. 111–203, § 1084(1), substituted ‘‘Bureau’’ for ‘‘Board’’ wherever appearing. 2009—Pub. L. 111–24, § 402, inserted ‘‘dormancy fees, inactivity charges or fees, service fees, or expiration dates of gift certificates, store gift cards, or general- use prepaid cards,’’ after ‘‘electronic fund transfers,’’. Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries EFFECTIVE DATE OF 2010 AMENDMENT Amendment by section 1084(1) of Pub. L. 111–203 effec- tive on the designated transfer date, see section 1100H of Pub. L. 111–203, set out as a note under section 552a of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees. EFFECTIVE DATE OF 2009 AMENDMENT Amendment by Pub. L. 111–24 effective 15 months after May 22, 2009, see section 403 of Pub. L. 111–24, set out as an Effective Date note under section 1693l–1 of this title. § 1693r. Exemption for State regulation The Bureau shall by regulation exempt from the requirements of this subchapter any class of electronic fund transfers within any State if the Bureau determines that under the law of that State that class of electronic fund transfers is subject to requirements substantially similar to those imposed by this subchapter, and that there is adequate provision for enforcement. (Pub. L. 90–321, title IX, § 922, formerly § 920, as added Pub. L. 95–630, title XX, § 2001, Nov. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 3741; renumbered § 921, Pub. L. 111–24, title IV, § 401(1), May 22, 2009, 123 Stat. 1751; renumbered § 922 and amended Pub. L. 111–203, title X, §§ 1073(a)(3), 1084(1), July 21, 2010, 124 Stat. 2060, 2081.) Editorial Notes CODIFICATION Another section 922 of Pub. L. 90–321 is classified to section 1693q of this title. Renumbering of section 920 of Pub. L. 90–321 as sec- tion 921 by section 401(1) of Pub. L. 111–24 was executed prior to the renumbering of section 921 of Pub. L. 90–321 as section 922 by section 1073(a)(3) of Pub. L. 111–203 as the probable intent of Congress, notwithstanding sec- tion 403 of Pub. L. 111–24, set out as an Effective Date note under section 1693l–1 of this title and section 4 of

Cross-references

Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

15 U.S.C. § 1693q — Relation to State laws

This subchapter does not annul, alter, or affect the laws of any State relating to electronic fund transfers, dormancy fees, inactivity charges or fees, service fees, or expiration dates of gift certificates, store gift cards, or general-use prepaid cards, except to the extent that those laws are inconsistent with the provisions of this subchapter, and then only to the extent of the inconsistency. A State law is not inconsistent with this subchapter if the protection such law affords any consumer is greater than the protection afforded by this subchapter. The Bureau shall, upon its own motion or upon the request of any financial institution, State, or other interested party, submitted in accordance with procedures prescribed in regulations of the Bureau, determine whether a State requirement is inconsistent or affords greater protection. If the Bureau determines that a State requirement is inconsistent, financial institutions shall incur no liability under the law of that State for a good faith failure to comply with that law, notwithstanding that such determination is subsequently amended, rescinded, or determined by judicial or other authority to be invalid for any reason. This subchapter does not extend the applicability of any such law to any class of persons or transactions to which it would not otherwise apply.

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 15 U.S.C. § 1693q

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.