Browse Arkansas Code titles and sections
10 U.S.C. § 125a — Reform: improvement of efficacy and effi-
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 143
TITLE 10—ARMED FORCES
§ 125a
1055; Pub. L. 101–510, div. A, title XIII, § 1301(3),
Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1668; Pub. L. 113–291, div. A,
title X, § 1071(c)(1), Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3508;
Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, § 809(a), Aug.
13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1840; Pub. L. 116–283, div. A,
title IX, § 924(b)(3)(A), (b)(6), Jan. 1, 2021, 134
Stat. 3821, 3822.)
HISTORICAL AND REVISION NOTES
Revised
section
Source (U.S. Code)
Source (Statutes at Large)
125(a) ......
125(b) ......
125(c) ......
125(d) ......
5:171a(c)(1), (2).
5:171n(a) (as applicable to
5:171a(c)(1)).
5:171a(c)(5).
5:171n(a) (as applicable to
5:171a(c)(5)).
5:171a(c)(4).
5:171a(c)(6).
5:171n(a) (as applicable to
5:171a(c)(6)).
July 26, 1947, ch. 343,
§ 202(c)(1), (2), (4), (5),
(6); added Aug. 10, 1949,
ch. 412, § 5(3d, 4th, 6th,
7th, and 8th pars.); re-
stated Aug. 6, 1958,
Pub. L. 85–599, § 3(a),
(1st, 2d, 5th, 6th, and
7th pars.), 72 Stat. 514,
515.
July 26, 1947, ch. 343,
§ 308(a) (as applicable
to § 202(c)(1), (5), (6)), 61
Stat. 509.
In subsection (a), the following substitutions are
made: ‘‘Except as provided by subsections (b) and (c)’’
for ‘‘except as otherwise provided in this subsection’’;
‘‘vested . . . by law’’ for ‘‘established by law to be per-
formed by’’; ‘‘recommending’’ for ‘‘stating’’; ‘‘proposes’’
for ‘‘contemplates’’; and ‘‘the period’’ for ‘‘the thirty-
day period or the forty-day period’’. The words ‘‘on the
first day after’’ are inserted for clarity. The words ‘‘if
carried out’’ are omitted as surplusage.
In subsection (b), the words ‘‘Notwithstanding sub-
section (a)’’ are substituted for the words ‘‘Notwith-
standing other provisions of this subsection’’; and ‘‘Un-
less the President determines otherwise’’ for ‘‘subject
to t
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 10 U.S.C. § 125a
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.
Original supplied file — preserved unchanged
Download original Markdown file
File SHA-256: e07f239922f234b1e8ce34dba009190e4713f18e22933276560ac6ebc7700873. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.
Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.
Open the recorded source website ↗
Record provenance
Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:usc2024-2b08a10a8c9eb8794b94316d
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code-2024/title-10/section-125a-reform-improvement-of-efficacy-and-effi--5cccf97004.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: 1b27914d9e9f22546f8e8ee4f12771145774b44895e4123a517f64a7050d8644
Source location: USCODE-2024-title10-subtitleA-partI-chap3-sec125a.pdf
Stored source content
Page 143
TITLE 10—ARMED FORCES
§ 125a
1055; Pub. L. 101–510, div. A, title XIII, § 1301(3),
Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1668; Pub. L. 113–291, div. A,
title X, § 1071(c)(1), Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3508;
Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, § 809(a), Aug.
13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1840; Pub. L. 116–283, div. A,
title IX, § 924(b)(3)(A), (b)(6), Jan. 1, 2021, 134
Stat. 3821, 3822.)
HISTORICAL AND REVISION NOTES
Revised
section
Source (U.S. Code)
Source (Statutes at Large)
125(a) ......
125(b) ......
125(c) ......
125(d) ......
5:171a(c)(1), (2).
5:171n(a) (as applicable to
5:171a(c)(1)).
5:171a(c)(5).
5:171n(a) (as applicable to
5:171a(c)(5)).
5:171a(c)(4).
5:171a(c)(6).
5:171n(a) (as applicable to
5:171a(c)(6)).
July 26, 1947, ch. 343,
§ 202(c)(1), (2), (4), (5),
(6); added Aug. 10, 1949,
ch. 412, § 5(3d, 4th, 6th,
7th, and 8th pars.); re-
stated Aug. 6, 1958,
Pub. L. 85–599, § 3(a),
(1st, 2d, 5th, 6th, and
7th pars.), 72 Stat. 514,
515.
July 26, 1947, ch. 343,
§ 308(a) (as applicable
to § 202(c)(1), (5), (6)), 61
Stat. 509.
In subsection (a), the following substitutions are
made: ‘‘Except as provided by subsections (b) and (c)’’
for ‘‘except as otherwise provided in this subsection’’;
‘‘vested . . . by law’’ for ‘‘established by law to be per-
formed by’’; ‘‘recommending’’ for ‘‘stating’’; ‘‘proposes’’
for ‘‘contemplates’’; and ‘‘the period’’ for ‘‘the thirty-
day period or the forty-day period’’. The words ‘‘on the
first day after’’ are inserted for clarity. The words ‘‘if
carried out’’ are omitted as surplusage.
In subsection (b), the words ‘‘Notwithstanding sub-
section (a)’’ are substituted for the words ‘‘Notwith-
standing other provisions of this subsection’’; and ‘‘Un-
less the President determines otherwise’’ for ‘‘subject
to the determination of the President’’.
In subsection (c), the following substitutions are
made: ‘‘Notwithstanding subsection (a)’’ for ‘‘Notwith-
standing the provisions of paragraph (1) hereof’’; and
‘‘armed forces’’ for ‘‘services’’.
In subsection (d), the following substitutions are
made: ‘‘In subsection (a) (1)’’ for ‘‘within the meaning
of paragraph (1) hereof’’; and ‘‘considers’’ for ‘‘deems’’.
The words ‘‘advantageous to the Government in terms
of’’ are omitted as surplusage.
Editorial Notes
AMENDMENTS
2021—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 116–283 substituted ‘‘Marine
Corps, or Space Force’’ for ‘‘or Marine Corps’’ and
‘‘9062(c), or 9081’’ for ‘‘or 9062(c)’’.
2018—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 115–232 substituted ‘‘section
7062(b), 8062, 8063, or 9062(c)’’ for ‘‘section 3062(b), 5062,
5063, or 8062(c)’’.
2014—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 113–291 substituted ‘‘(50
U.S.C. 3002)’’ for ‘‘(50 U.S.C. 401)’’.
1990—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 101–510 struck out at end
‘‘However, notwithstanding any other provision of this
title or any other law, the Secretary of Defense shall
not direct or approve a plan to initiate or effect a sub-
stantial reduction or elimination of a major weapons
system until the Secretary of Defense has reported all
the pertinent details of the proposed action to the Con-
gress of the United States while the Congress is in ses-
sion.’’
1986—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 99–433, § 103(1), struck out
provision under which the Secretary of Defense could
substantially transfer, reassign, consolidate, or abolish
functions, powers, or duties vested in the Department
of Defense by law if the Secretary reported the details
of the proposed transfer, reassignment, consolidation,
or abolition to Congress and if Congress did not affirm-
atively reject the proposal.
Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 99–433, §§ 103(2), 514(c)(1), inserted
‘‘vested by law in the Department of Defense, or an of-
ficer, official, or agency thereof’’ and substituted ‘‘5062,
5063’’ for ‘‘5012, 5013’’.
Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 99–433, § 301(b)(1), struck out sub-
sec. (d) which read as follows: ‘‘In subsection (a)(1),
‘major combatant function, power, or duty’ does not in-
clude a supply or service activity common to more
than one military department. The Secretary of De-
fense shall, whenever he determines it will be more ef-
fective, economical, or efficient, provide for the per-
formance of such an activity by one agency or such
other organizations as he considers appropriate.’’
1984—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 98–525 substituted ‘‘section
2 of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 401)’’
for ‘‘section 401 of title 50’’.
1966—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 89–501 required the Sec-
retary of Defense to report to the Congress all the per-
tinent details regarding any substantial reduction or
elimination of a major weapons system before action
could be initiated or effected by the Department of De-
fense.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 2018 AMENDMENT
Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019,
with provision for the coordination of amendments and
special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800
of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section
3001 of this title.
RESOLUTIONS
RELATING
TO
TRANSFERS,
REASSIGN-
MENTS, CONSOLIDATIONS, OR ABOLITIONS
OF COMBAT-
ANT FUNCTIONS
Pub. L. 87–651, title III, § 303, Sept. 7, 1962, 76 Stat. 525,
provided that:
‘‘(a) For the purposes of this section, any resolution
reported to the Senate or the House of Representatives
pursuant to the provisions of section 125 of title 10,
United States Code, shall be treated for the purpose of
consideration by either House, in the same manner as
a resolution with respect to a reorganization plan re-
ported by a committee within the meaning of the Reor-
ganization Act of 1949 as in effect on July 1, 1958 (5
U.S.C. 133z and the following) [63 Stat. 203; 71 Stat. 611],
and shall be governed by the provisions applicable to
the consideration of any such resolution by either
House of the Congress as provided by sections 205 and
206 of that Act [63 Stat. 207].
‘‘(b) The provisions of this section are enacted by the
Congress—
‘‘(1) as an exercise of the rule-making power of the
Senate and the House of Representatives, respec-
tively, and as such they shall be considered as part of
the rules of each House, respectively, and supersede
other rules only to the extent that they are incon-
sistent therewith; and
‘‘(2) with full recognition of the constitutional
right of either House to change the rules (as far as re-
lating to the procedure in that House) at any time, in
the same manner and to the same extent as in the
case of any other rule of that House.’’
§ 125a. Reform: improvement of efficacy and effi-
ciency
(a) IN
GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense
shall take such action as is necessary to reform
the Department of Defense to improve the effi-
cacy and efficiency of the Department, and to
improve the ability of the Department to
prioritize among and assess the costs and bene-
fits of covered elements of reform.
(b) POLICY.—The Secretary shall develop a pol-
icy and issue guidance to implement reform
within the Department and to improve the abil-
ity of the Department to prioritize among and
assess the costs and benefits of covered elements
of reform.
(c) FRAMEWORK FOR REFORM.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than February 1,
2023, the Secretary shall establish policies,
Page 144
TITLE 10—ARMED FORCES
§ 125a
guidance, and a consistent reporting frame-
work to measure the progress of the Depart-
ment toward covered elements of reform, in-
cluding by establishing categories of reform,
consistent
metrics,
and
a
process
for
prioritization of reform activities.
(2) SCOPE.—The framework required by para-
graph (1) may address duties under the fol-
lowing:
(A) Section 125 of this title.
(B) Section 192 of this title.
(C) Section 2222 of this title.
(D) Section 1124 of title 31.
(E) Section 11319 of title 40.
(3) CONSULTATION.—The Secretary shall con-
sult with the Deputy Secretary of Defense, the
Performance Improvement Officer of the De-
partment of Defense, the Chief Data Officer of
the Department of Defense, the Chief Informa-
tion Officer of the Department of Defense, the
Director for Administration and Management
of the Department of Defense, and the finan-
cial managers of the military departments in
carrying out activities under this subsection.
(d) COVERED ELEMENTS OF REFORM.—For pur-
poses of this section and the policies, guidance,
and reporting framework required by subsection
(c), covered elements of reform may include the
following:
(1) Business systems modernization.
(2) Enterprise business operations process re-
engineering.
(3) Expanded and modernized collection,
management, dissemination, and visualization
of data to support decision-making at all lev-
els of the enterprise.
(4) Improvements in workforce training and
education and increasing capabilities of the
Department workforce to support and execute
reform activities and business processes.
(5) Improvements to decision-making proc-
esses to enable cost savings, cost avoidance, or
investments to develop process improvements.
(6) Development and implementation of a
uniform methodology for tracking and assess-
ing cost savings and cost avoidance from re-
form initiatives.
(7) Implementation of reform-focused re-
search to improve management and adminis-
trative science.
(8) Tracking and implementation of techno-
logical approaches to improve management
decision-making,
such
as
artificial
intel-
ligence tools.
(9) Such other elements as the Secretary
considers appropriate.
(e) ANNUAL REPORT.—At the same time the
budget of the President for a fiscal year is sub-
mitted to Congress pursuant to section 1105 of
title 31, the Secretary shall, using the policies,
guidance, and reporting framework required by
subsection (c), submit to the congressional de-
fense committees a report, including detailed
narrative justifications and tradeoff analyses
between options, on the actions of the Depart-
ment as follows:
(1) The activities, expenditures, and accom-
plishments carried out or made to effect re-
form under this section during the fiscal year
in which such budget is submitted.
(2) The proposed activities, expenditures,
and accomplishments to effect reform under
this section, and consistent with priorities es-
tablished by the Secretary, during the fiscal
year covered by such budget and each of the
four succeeding fiscal years.
(Added Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title IX, § 911(a)(1),
Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 3800; amended Pub. L.
117–263, div. A, title IX, § 911, Dec. 23, 2022, 136
Stat. 2750.)
Editorial Notes
AMENDMENTS
2022—Subsec. (c)(1). Pub. L. 117–263, § 911(1)(A), sub-
stituted ‘‘2023’’ for ‘‘2022’’.
Subsec. (c)(3). Pub. L. 117–263, § 911(1)(B), inserted
‘‘the Director for Administration and Management of
the Department of Defense,’’ after ‘‘the Chief Informa-
tion Officer of the Department of Defense,’’.
Subsec. (d)(6) to (9). Pub. L. 117–263, § 911(2), added
pars. (6) to (8) and redesignated former par. (6) as (9).
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT DASHBOARD DEMONSTRATION
Pub. L. 117–263, div. A, title IX, § 916, Dec. 23, 2022, 136
Stat. 2755, provided that:
‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than one year after the
date of the enactment of this Act [Dec. 23, 2022], the
Secretary of Defense shall conduct a demonstration of
a strategic management dashboard to automate the
data collection and data visualization of the primary
management goals of the Department of Defense.
‘‘(b) ELEMENTS.—The Secretary of Defense shall en-
sure that the strategic management dashboard dem-
onstrated under subsection (a) includes the following:
‘‘(1) The capability for real-time monitoring of the
performance of the Department of Defense in meeting
the management goals of the Department.
‘‘(2) An integrated analytics capability, including
the ability to dynamically add or upgrade new capa-
bilities when needed.
‘‘(3) Integration with the framework required by
subsection (c) of section 125a of title 10, United States
Code, for measuring the progress of the Department
toward covered elements of reform (as defined in sub-
section (d) of that section).
‘‘(4) Incorporation of the elements of the strategic
management plan required by section 904(d) of the
National Defense Authorization Act of Fiscal Year
2008 (Public Law 110–181; 10 U.S.C. note prec. 2201), as
derived from automated data feeds from existing in-
formation systems and databases.
‘‘(5) Incorporation of the elements of the most re-
cent annual performance plan of the Department re-
quired by section 1115(b) of title 31, United States
Code, and the most recent update on performance of
the Department required by section 1116 of that title.
‘‘(6) Use of artificial intelligence and machine
learning tools to improve decision making and as-
sessment relating to data analytics.
‘‘(7) Adoption of leading and lagging indicators for
key strategic management goals.
‘‘(c) AUTHORITIES.—
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—In conducting the demonstration
required by subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense
may use the authorities described in paragraph (2),
and such other authorities as the Secretary considers
appropriate—
‘‘(A) to help accelerate the development of inno-
vative technological or process approaches; and
‘‘(B) to attract new entrants to solve the data
management and visualization challenges of the
Department.
‘‘(2) AUTHORITIES
DESCRIBED.—The authorities de-
scribed in this paragraph are the authorities provided
under the following provisions of law:
Page 145
TITLE 10—ARMED FORCES
§ 127
‘‘(A) Section 4025 of title 10, United States Code
(relating to prizes for advanced technology achieve-
ments).
‘‘(B) Section 217 of the National Defense Author-
ization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92;
10 U.S.C. 2222 note) (relating to science and tech-
nology activities to support business systems infor-
mation technology acquisition programs).
‘‘(C) Section 908 of the National Defense Author-
ization Act for Fiscal Year 2022 (Public Law 117–81;
10 U.S.C. 129a note) (relating to management inno-
vation activities).
‘‘(d) USE OF BEST PRACTICES.—In conducting the dem-
onstration required by subsection (a), the Secretary of
Defense shall leverage commercial best practices in
management and leading research in management and
data science.
‘‘(e) STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT DASHBOARD DEFINED.—
In this section, the term ‘strategic management dash-
board’ means a system for dynamically displaying
management metrics, performance goals, and other in-
formation necessary for Department of Defense leader-
ship to make strategic decisions related to the manage-
ment of the Department using modern, commercial
practices for data visualization and drawn from exist-
ing automated information systems available to the
Department.’’
IMPLEMENTING POLICIES, GUIDANCE, AND REPORTING
FRAMEWORK
Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title IX, § 911(b), Jan. 1, 2021,
134 Stat. 3801, provided that:
‘‘(1) SUBMITTAL TO CONGRESS.—Not later than March
1, 2022, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the
congressional defense committees [Committees on
Armed Services and Appropriations of the Senate and
the House of Representatives] a report setting forth the
policies, guidance, and reporting framework estab-
lished pursuant to subsection (c) of section 125a of title
10, United States Code (as added by subsection (a) of
this section).
‘‘(2) UPDATE.—Not later than 90 days after the date of
the submittal to Congress of the report required by sec-
tion 901(d) of this Act [10 U.S.C. 132a note], the Sec-
retary shall update the reporting framework referred to
in paragraph (1).’’
§ 126. Transfer of funds and employees
(a) When a function, power, or duty or an ac-
tivity of a department or agency of the Depart-
ment of Defense is transferred or assigned to an-
other department or agency of that department,
balances of appropriations that the Secretary of
Defense determines are available and needed to
finance or discharge that function, power, duty,
or activity, as the case may be, may, with the
approval of the President, be transferred to the
department or agency to which that function,
power, duty or activity, as the case may be, is
transferred, and used for any purpose for which
those appropriations were originally available.
Balances of appropriations so transferred shall—
(1) be credited to any applicable appropria-
tion account of the receiving department or
agency; or
(2) be credited to a new account that may be
established on the books of the Department of
the Treasury;
and be merged with the funds already credited
to that account and accounted for as one fund.
Balances of appropriations credited to an ac-
count under clause (1) are subject only to such
limitations as are specifically applicable to that
account. Balances of appropriations credited to
an account under clause (2) are subject only to
such limitations as are applicable to the appro-
priations from which they are transferred.
(b) When a function, power, or duty or an ac-
tivity of a department or agency of the Depart-
ment of Defense is transferred to another de-
partment or agency of that department, those
civilian employees of the department or agency
from which the transfer is made that the Sec-
retary of Defense determines are needed to per-
form that function, power, or duty, or for that
activity, as the case may be, may, with the ap-
proval of the President, be transferred to the de-
partment or agency to which that function,
power, duty, or activity, as the case may be, is
transferred. The authorized strength in civilian
employees of a department or agency from
which employees are transferred under this sec-
tion is reduced by the number of employees so
transferred. The authorized strength in civilian
employees of a department or agency to which
employees are transferred under this section is
increased by the number of employees so trans-
ferred.
(Added Pub. L. 87–651, title II, § 201(a), Sept. 7,
1962, 76 Stat. 516; amended Pub. L. 96–513, title V,
§ 511(2), Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 2920.)
HISTORICAL AND REVISION NOTES
Revised
section
Source (U.S. Code)
Source (Statutes at Large)
126(a) ......
126(b) ......
5:172f(a).
5:171n(a) (as applicable to
5:172f(a)).
5:172f (less (a)).
July 26, 1947, ch. 343,
§ 407; added Aug. 10,
1949, ch. 412, § 11 (21st
and 22d pars.), 63 Stat.
589.
July 26, 1947, ch. 343,
§ 308(a) (as applicable
to § 407), 61 Stat. 509.
In subsection (a), the words ‘‘under authority of law’’
are omitted as surplusage. The following substitutions
are made: ‘‘needed’’ for ‘‘necessary’’; ‘‘used’’ for ‘‘be
available for use by’’; and ‘‘those appropriations’’ for
‘‘said funds’’.
In subsection (b), 5 U.S.C. 172f(b) is restated to reflect
more clearly its purpose to authorize ‘‘transfers of per-
sonnel’’ (Senate Report No. 366, 81st Congress, p. 23).
Editorial Notes
AMENDMENTS
1980—Subsec. (b) Pub. L. 96–513 substituted ‘‘Presi-
dent’’ for ‘‘Director of the Bureau of the Budget’’.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1980 AMENDMENT
Amendment by Pub. L. 96–513 effective Dec. 12, 1980,
see section 701(b)(3) of Pub. L. 96–513, set out as a note
under section 101 of this title.
Executive Documents
DELEGATION OF FUNCTIONS
Authority of President under subsec. (a) of this sec-
tion to approve transfers of balances of appropriations
provided for therein delegated to Director of Office of
Management and Budget, see section 9(2) of Ex. Ord.
No. 11609, July 22, 1971, 36 F.R. 13747, set out as a note
under section 301 of Title 3, The President.
§ 127. Emergency and extraordinary expenses
(a) Subject to the limitations of subsection (c),
and within the limitation of appropriations
made for the purpose, the Secretary of Defense,
Cross-references
Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a) In General.—** The Secretary of Defense shall take such action as is necessary to reform the Department of Defense to improve the efficacy and efficiency of the Department, and to improve the ability of the Department to prioritize among and assess the costs and benefits of covered elements of reform.
**(b) Policy.—** The Secretary shall develop a policy and issue guidance to implement reform within the Department and to improve the ability of the Department to prioritize among and assess the costs and benefits of covered elements of reform.
**(c) Framework for Reform.—**
(1) **In general.—** — Not later than February 1, 2023, the Secretary shall establish policies, guidance, and a consistent reporting framework to measure the progress of the Department toward covered elements of reform, including by establishing categories of reform, consistent metrics, and a process for prioritization of reform activities.
(2) **Scope.—** — The framework required by paragraph (1) may address duties under the following:
(A) [Section 125 of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title10-section125&num=0&edition=prelim).
(B) [Section 192 of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title10-section192&num=0&edition=prelim).
(C) [Section 2222 of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title10-section2222&num=0&edition=prelim).
(D) [Section 1124 of title 31](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title31-section1124&num=0&edition=prelim).
(E) [Section 11319 of title 40](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title40-section11319&num=0&edition=prelim).
(3) **Consultation.—** — The Secretary shall consult with the Deputy Secret
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 10 U.S.C. § 125a
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a) Policies and Procedures.—** The Secretary of Defense shall establish policies and procedures for determining the most appropriate and cost efficient mix of military, civilian, and contractor personnel to perform the mission of the Department of Defense.
**(b) Risk Mitigation Over Cost.—** In establishing the policies and procedures under subsection (a), the Secretary shall clearly provide that attainment of a Department of Defense workforce sufficiently sized and comprised of the appropriate mix of personnel necessary to carry out the mission of the Department and the core mission areas of the armed forces takes precedence over cost. The Secretary may not reduce the civilian workforce programmed full-time equivalent levels, or conduct any reductions or realignments that occur outside the normal programming process (including ad hoc, immediate, or unprogrammed changes) of 50 employees or more implemented before or after the submission of the annual budget request, unless the Secretary conducts an appropriate analysis of the impacts of such reductions on workload, military force structure, lethality, readiness, operational effectiveness, stress on the military force, and fully burdened costs.
**(c) Delegation of Responsibilities.—** The Secretary shall delegate responsibility for implementation of the policies and procedures established under subsection (a) as follows:
(1) The Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness shall have overall responsibility for guidance to implement such policies and procedures.
(2) The Secretaries of the military departments and the heads of the Defense Agencies shall have overall responsibility for the requirements determination, planning, programming, and budgeting for such policies and procedures. The Secretary of Def
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 10 U.S.C. § 129a
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. The source passage cites 10 U.S.C. § 129a. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 158
TITLE 10—ARMED FORCES
§ 129a
Stat. 2658, 2735; Pub. L. 105–85, div. A, title XI,
§ 1101, Nov. 18, 1997, 111 Stat. 1922; Pub. L. 106–65,
div. A, title X, § 1067(1), Oct. 5, 1999, 113 Stat. 774;
Pub. L. 112–81, div. A, title IX, § 932, Dec. 31, 2011,
125 Stat. 1543; Pub. L. 114–328, div. A, title XI,
§ 1101(a), (b)(1), Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2443; Pub.
L. 116–92, div. A, title XI, § 1103, Dec. 20, 2019, 133
Stat. 1596; Pub. L. 117–81, div. A, title XI, § 1102,
Dec. 27, 2021, 135 Stat. 1949.)
Editorial Notes
AMENDMENTS
2021—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 117–81, in first sentence,
substituted ‘‘solely’’ for ‘‘primarily’’ and, in second
sentence, struck out ‘‘solely’’ after ‘‘shall not be sub-
ject’’.
2019—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 116–92, § 1103(1), in first sen-
tence, substituted ‘‘each fiscal year primarily’’ for
‘‘each fiscal year’’, and in second sentence, substituted
‘‘The management of such personnel in any fiscal year
shall not be subject solely to any’’ for ‘‘Any’’ and
struck out ‘‘shall be developed on the basis of those fac-
tors and shall be subject to adjustment solely for rea-
sons of changed circumstances’’ after ‘‘number of em-
ployees’’.
Subsec. (c)(2)(A). Pub. L. 116–92, § 1103(2)(A), inserted
‘‘and associated cost’’ after ‘‘projected size’’.
Subsec. (c)(2)(B). Pub. L. 116–92, § 1103(2), inserted
‘‘and associated cost’’ after ‘‘projected size’’ in two
places and substituted ‘‘to reduce the overall costs of
the total force of military, civilian, and contract
workforces.’’ for ‘‘that have been taken to identify off-
setting reductions and avoid unnecessary overall
growth in the size of the civilian workforce.’’
2016—Pub. L. 114–328, § 1101(b)(1), amended section
catchline generally, substituting ‘‘Civilian personnel
management’’ for
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 10 U.S.C. § 129a
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. The source passage cites 10 U.S.C. § 129a. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a) Establishment.—**
(1) There is a Performance Improvement Officer of the Department of Defense, to be appointed by the Secretary of Defense from among the ranks of qualified individuals from the senior career civil service.
(2) The Performance Improvement Officer shall be appointed from among persons described in paragraph (1) who have an extensive management or business background and experience with managing large or complex organizations, organizational change management, or business transformation activities.
**(b) Deputy.—** The Performance Improvement Officer shall be supported by a Deputy who shall be appointed by the Secretary of Defense from among the ranks of qualified individuals from the senior career civil service. The Deputy shall be the first assistant to the Performance Improvement Officer and shall assist that Officer in the performance of the duties of that position and shall act for, and exercise the powers of, the Officer when that Officer dies, resigns, or is otherwise unable to perform the functions and duties of the office.
**(c) Duties and Responsibilities.—** Subject to the authority, direction, and control of the Secretary of Defense and the Deputy Secretary of Defense, the Performance Improvement Officer shall perform such duties, exercise such powers, and have such responsibilities as the Secretary or the Deputy Secretary may prescribe, including the following:
(1) Responsibility for updating and implementing the Strategic Management Plan of the Department of Defense required by section 904(d) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 10 U.S.C. note prec. 2201).
(2) Responsibility for chairing the Defense Performance Improvement Council (or any successor organization).
(3) Responsibility f
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 10 U.S.C. § 132a
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. The source passage cites 10 U.S.C. § 132a. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 185
TITLE 10—ARMED FORCES
§ 132a
1 So in original. Probably should be capitalized as ‘‘Perform-
ance Improvement Officer’’.
2 So in original. Probably should be ‘‘for’’.
§ 132a. Performance improvement officer 1
(a) ESTABLISHMENT.—
(1) There is a Performance Improvement Of-
ficer of the Department of Defense, to be ap-
pointed by the Secretary of Defense from
among the ranks of qualified individuals from
the senior career civil service.
(2) The Performance Improvement Officer
shall be appointed from among persons de-
scribed in paragraph (1) who have an extensive
management or business background and expe-
rience with managing large or complex organi-
zations, organizational change management,
or business transformation activities.
(b) DEPUTY.—The Performance Improvement
Officer shall be supported by a Deputy who shall
be appointed by the Secretary of Defense from
among the ranks of qualified individuals from
the senior career civil service. The Deputy shall
be the first assistant to the Performance Im-
provement Officer and shall assist that Officer
in the performance of the duties of that position
and shall act for, and exercise the powers of, the
Officer when that Officer dies, resigns, or is oth-
erwise unable to perform the functions and du-
ties of the office.
(c) DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES.—Subject to
the authority, direction, and control of the Sec-
retary of Defense and the Deputy Secretary of
Defense, the Performance Improvement Officer
shall perform such duties, exercise such powers,
and have such responsibilities as the Secretary
or the Deputy Secretary may prescribe, includ-
ing the following:
(1) Responsibility for updating and imple-
menting the Strategic Management Plan of
the Department of Defense required by section
904
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 10 U.S.C. § 132a
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. The source passage cites 10 U.S.C. § 132a. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a) Defense Business Processes Generally.—** The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that defense business processes are reviewed, and as appropriate revised, through business process reengineering to match best commercial practices, to the maximum extent practicable, so as to minimize customization of commercial business systems.
**(b) Defense Business Systems Generally.—** The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that each covered defense business system developed, deployed, and operated by the Department of Defense—
(1) supports efficient business processes that have been reviewed, and as appropriate revised, through business process reengineering;
(2) is integrated into a comprehensive defense business enterprise architecture;
(3) is managed in a manner that provides visibility into, and traceability of, expenditures for the system; and
(4) uses an acquisition and sustainment strategy that prioritizes the use of commercial software and business practices.
**(c) Issuance of Guidance.—**
(1) **Secretary of defense guidance.—** — The Secretary shall issue guidance to provide for the coordination of, and decision making for, the planning, programming, and control of investments in covered defense business systems.
(2) **Supporting guidance.—** — The Secretary shall direct the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment, and the Chief Information Officer of each of the military departments to issue and maintain supporting guidance, as appropriate and within their respective areas of responsibility, for the guidance of the Secretary issued under paragraph (1).
**(d) Guidance Elements.—** The guidance issued under subsection (c) shall include the following elements:
(1) Policy to ensure that
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 10 U.S.C. § 2222
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. The source passage cites 10 U.S.C. § 2222. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 1762
TITLE 10—ARMED FORCES
[§ 2221
days after the date on which such final regulations
are published.’’
PILOT
PROGRAMS
FOR
TESTING
PROGRAM
MANAGER
PERFORMANCE
OF PRODUCT SUPPORT OVERSIGHT RE-
SPONSIBILITIES FOR LIFE CYCLE OF ACQUISITION PRO-
GRAMS
Pub. L. 105–261, div. A, title VIII, § 816, Oct. 17, 1998,
112 Stat. 2088, authorized the Secretary of Defense to
designate 10 acquisition programs of the military de-
partments as pilot programs on program manager re-
sponsibility for product support and required report to
Congress by Feb. 1, 1999.
ENHANCED SYSTEM OF PERFORMANCE INCENTIVES
Pub. L. 103–355, title V, § 5001(b), Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat.
3350, provided that, within one year after Oct. 13, 1994,
the Secretary of Defense should review the incentives
and personnel actions available for encouraging excel-
lence in the management of defense acquisition pro-
grams and provide an enhanced system of incentives,
including pay for performance, to facilitate the
achievement of goals approved or defined pursuant to
subsec. (a) of this section.
RECOMMENDED LEGISLATION
Pub. L. 103–355, title V, § 5001(c), Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat.
3350, directed the Secretary of Defense, not later than
one year after Oct 13, 1994, to submit to Congress any
recommended legislation that the Secretary considered
necessary to carry out this section and otherwise to fa-
cilitate and enhance management of Department of De-
fense acquisition programs on the basis of performance.
[§ 2221. Repealed. Pub. L. 105–261, div. A, title IX,
§ 906(f)(1), Oct. 17, 1998, 112 Stat. 2096]
Section, added Pub. L. 104–106, div. A, title IX,
§ 914(a)(1), Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 412; amended Pub. L.
104–201, div. A, title X, § 1008(a), Sept. 23, 1996, 110 Stat.
2633; Pub. L. 105–85, div.
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 10 U.S.C. § 2222
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. The source passage cites 10 U.S.C. § 2222. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a) Sense of Congress** It is the sense of Congress that—
(1) the People’s Republic of China appears to be specifically targeting the Chinese-American community for intelligence purposes;
(2) such targeting carries a substantial risk that the loyalty of such Americans may be generally questioned and lead to unacceptable stereotyping, targeting, and racial profiling;
(3) the United States Government has a duty to warn and protect all Americans including those of Chinese descent from these intelligence efforts by the People’s Republic of China;
(4) the broad stereotyping, targeting, and racial profiling of Americans of Chinese descent is contrary to the values of the United States and reinforces the flawed narrative perpetuated by the People’s Republic of China that ethnically Chinese individuals worldwide have a duty to support the People’s Republic of China; and
(5) the United States efforts to combat the People’s Republic of China’s intelligence activities should actively safeguard and promote the constitutional rights of all Chinese Americans.
**(b) Report** On an annual basis, the Director of National Intelligence, acting through the Office of Civil Liberties, Privacy, and Transparency, in coordination with the civil liberties and privacy officers of the elements of the intelligence community, shall submit a report to the congressional intelligence committees containing—
(1) a review of how the policies, procedures, and practices of the intelligence community that govern the intelligence activities and operations targeting the People’s Republic of China affect policies, procedures, and practices relating to the privacy, civil liberties, and civil rights of Americans of Chinese descent who may be targets of espionage and influence operations by China; and
(2
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 50 U.S.C. § 3002
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. The source passage cites 50 U.S.C. § 3002. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 558
TITLE 50—WAR AND NATIONAL DEFENSE
§ 3002
as those required by FISA and Executive Order 12333.
This order is not intended to alter the rules applicable
to United States persons adopted pursuant to FISA,
Executive Order 12333, or other applicable law.
(f) This order shall apply to signals intelligence ac-
tivities consistent with the scope of PPD–28’s applica-
tion to such activities prior to PPD–28’s partial revoca-
tion by the national security memorandum issued con-
currently with this order. To implement this sub-
section, the head of each agency containing an element
of the Intelligence Community, in consultation with
the Attorney General and the Director, is hereby dele-
gated the authority to issue guidance, which may be
classified, as appropriate, as to the scope of application
of this order with respect to the element or elements of
the Intelligence Community within their agency. The
CLPO and the Data Protection Review Court, in car-
rying out the functions assigned to it under this order,
shall treat such guidance as authoritative and binding.
(g) Nothing in this order confers authority to declas-
sify or disclose classified national security information
except as authorized pursuant to Executive Order 13526
or any successor order. Consistent with the require-
ments of Executive Order 13526, the CLPO, the Data
Protection Review Court, and the special advocates
shall not have authority to declassify classified na-
tional security information, nor shall they disclose any
classified or otherwise privileged or protected informa-
tion except to authorized and appropriately cleared in-
dividuals who have a need to know the information.
(h) This order creates an entitlement to submit quali-
fying complaints to the CLPO and to obtain review of
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 50 U.S.C. § 3002
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. The source passage cites 50 U.S.C. § 3002. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
### Statutory Notes
#### Codification
Section 442a, comprising section 1102 of the National Security Act of 1947, act July 26, 1947, ch. 343, was editorially reclassified as [section 3232 of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title50-section3232&num=0&edition=prelim).
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 50 U.S.C. § 401
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. The source passage cites 50 U.S.C. § 401. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.