Arkansas Legal Resource Navigator

10 U.S.C. § 125a — Reform: improvement of efficacy and effi-

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

10 U.S.C. § 125a — Reform: improvement of efficacy and effi-

Page 143 TITLE 10—ARMED FORCES § 125a 1055; Pub. L. 101–510, div. A, title XIII, § 1301(3), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1668; Pub. L. 113–291, div. A, title X, § 1071(c)(1), Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3508; Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, § 809(a), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1840; Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title IX, § 924(b)(3)(A), (b)(6), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 3821, 3822.) HISTORICAL AND REVISION NOTES Revised section Source (U.S. Code) Source (Statutes at Large) 125(a) ...... 125(b) ...... 125(c) ...... 125(d) ...... 5:171a(c)(1), (2). 5:171n(a) (as applicable to 5:171a(c)(1)). 5:171a(c)(5). 5:171n(a) (as applicable to 5:171a(c)(5)). 5:171a(c)(4). 5:171a(c)(6). 5:171n(a) (as applicable to 5:171a(c)(6)). July 26, 1947, ch. 343, § 202(c)(1), (2), (4), (5), (6); added Aug. 10, 1949, ch. 412, § 5(3d, 4th, 6th, 7th, and 8th pars.); re- stated Aug. 6, 1958, Pub. L. 85–599, § 3(a), (1st, 2d, 5th, 6th, and 7th pars.), 72 Stat. 514, 515. July 26, 1947, ch. 343, § 308(a) (as applicable to § 202(c)(1), (5), (6)), 61 Stat. 509. In subsection (a), the following substitutions are made: ‘‘Except as provided by subsections (b) and (c)’’ for ‘‘except as otherwise provided in this subsection’’; ‘‘vested . . . by law’’ for ‘‘established by law to be per- formed by’’; ‘‘recommending’’ for ‘‘stating’’; ‘‘proposes’’ for ‘‘contemplates’’; and ‘‘the period’’ for ‘‘the thirty- day period or the forty-day period’’. The words ‘‘on the first day after’’ are inserted for clarity. The words ‘‘if carried out’’ are omitted as surplusage. In subsection (b), the words ‘‘Notwithstanding sub- section (a)’’ are substituted for the words ‘‘Notwith- standing other provisions of this subsection’’; and ‘‘Un- less the President determines otherwise’’ for ‘‘subject to t

Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 10 U.S.C. § 125a

Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.

Original supplied file — preserved unchanged

Download original Markdown file

File SHA-256: e07f239922f234b1e8ce34dba009190e4713f18e22933276560ac6ebc7700873. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.

Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.

Open the recorded source website ↗

Record provenance

Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:usc2024-2b08a10a8c9eb8794b94316d
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code-2024/title-10/section-125a-reform-improvement-of-efficacy-and-effi--5cccf97004.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: 1b27914d9e9f22546f8e8ee4f12771145774b44895e4123a517f64a7050d8644

Source location: USCODE-2024-title10-subtitleA-partI-chap3-sec125a.pdf

Stored source content

Page 143 TITLE 10—ARMED FORCES § 125a 1055; Pub. L. 101–510, div. A, title XIII, § 1301(3), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1668; Pub. L. 113–291, div. A, title X, § 1071(c)(1), Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3508; Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, § 809(a), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1840; Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title IX, § 924(b)(3)(A), (b)(6), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 3821, 3822.) HISTORICAL AND REVISION NOTES Revised section Source (U.S. Code) Source (Statutes at Large) 125(a) ...... 125(b) ...... 125(c) ...... 125(d) ...... 5:171a(c)(1), (2). 5:171n(a) (as applicable to 5:171a(c)(1)). 5:171a(c)(5). 5:171n(a) (as applicable to 5:171a(c)(5)). 5:171a(c)(4). 5:171a(c)(6). 5:171n(a) (as applicable to 5:171a(c)(6)). July 26, 1947, ch. 343, § 202(c)(1), (2), (4), (5), (6); added Aug. 10, 1949, ch. 412, § 5(3d, 4th, 6th, 7th, and 8th pars.); re- stated Aug. 6, 1958, Pub. L. 85–599, § 3(a), (1st, 2d, 5th, 6th, and 7th pars.), 72 Stat. 514, 515. July 26, 1947, ch. 343, § 308(a) (as applicable to § 202(c)(1), (5), (6)), 61 Stat. 509. In subsection (a), the following substitutions are made: ‘‘Except as provided by subsections (b) and (c)’’ for ‘‘except as otherwise provided in this subsection’’; ‘‘vested . . . by law’’ for ‘‘established by law to be per- formed by’’; ‘‘recommending’’ for ‘‘stating’’; ‘‘proposes’’ for ‘‘contemplates’’; and ‘‘the period’’ for ‘‘the thirty- day period or the forty-day period’’. The words ‘‘on the first day after’’ are inserted for clarity. The words ‘‘if carried out’’ are omitted as surplusage. In subsection (b), the words ‘‘Notwithstanding sub- section (a)’’ are substituted for the words ‘‘Notwith- standing other provisions of this subsection’’; and ‘‘Un- less the President determines otherwise’’ for ‘‘subject to the determination of the President’’. In subsection (c), the following substitutions are made: ‘‘Notwithstanding subsection (a)’’ for ‘‘Notwith- standing the provisions of paragraph (1) hereof’’; and ‘‘armed forces’’ for ‘‘services’’. In subsection (d), the following substitutions are made: ‘‘In subsection (a) (1)’’ for ‘‘within the meaning of paragraph (1) hereof’’; and ‘‘considers’’ for ‘‘deems’’. The words ‘‘advantageous to the Government in terms of’’ are omitted as surplusage. Editorial Notes AMENDMENTS 2021—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 116–283 substituted ‘‘Marine Corps, or Space Force’’ for ‘‘or Marine Corps’’ and ‘‘9062(c), or 9081’’ for ‘‘or 9062(c)’’. 2018—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 115–232 substituted ‘‘section 7062(b), 8062, 8063, or 9062(c)’’ for ‘‘section 3062(b), 5062, 5063, or 8062(c)’’. 2014—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 113–291 substituted ‘‘(50 U.S.C. 3002)’’ for ‘‘(50 U.S.C. 401)’’. 1990—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 101–510 struck out at end ‘‘However, notwithstanding any other provision of this title or any other law, the Secretary of Defense shall not direct or approve a plan to initiate or effect a sub- stantial reduction or elimination of a major weapons system until the Secretary of Defense has reported all the pertinent details of the proposed action to the Con- gress of the United States while the Congress is in ses- sion.’’ 1986—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 99–433, § 103(1), struck out provision under which the Secretary of Defense could substantially transfer, reassign, consolidate, or abolish functions, powers, or duties vested in the Department of Defense by law if the Secretary reported the details of the proposed transfer, reassignment, consolidation, or abolition to Congress and if Congress did not affirm- atively reject the proposal. Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 99–433, §§ 103(2), 514(c)(1), inserted ‘‘vested by law in the Department of Defense, or an of- ficer, official, or agency thereof’’ and substituted ‘‘5062, 5063’’ for ‘‘5012, 5013’’. Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 99–433, § 301(b)(1), struck out sub- sec. (d) which read as follows: ‘‘In subsection (a)(1), ‘major combatant function, power, or duty’ does not in- clude a supply or service activity common to more than one military department. The Secretary of De- fense shall, whenever he determines it will be more ef- fective, economical, or efficient, provide for the per- formance of such an activity by one agency or such other organizations as he considers appropriate.’’ 1984—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 98–525 substituted ‘‘section 2 of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 401)’’ for ‘‘section 401 of title 50’’. 1966—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 89–501 required the Sec- retary of Defense to report to the Congress all the per- tinent details regarding any substantial reduction or elimination of a major weapons system before action could be initiated or effected by the Department of De- fense. Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries EFFECTIVE DATE OF 2018 AMENDMENT Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title. RESOLUTIONS RELATING TO TRANSFERS, REASSIGN- MENTS, CONSOLIDATIONS, OR ABOLITIONS OF COMBAT- ANT FUNCTIONS Pub. L. 87–651, title III, § 303, Sept. 7, 1962, 76 Stat. 525, provided that: ‘‘(a) For the purposes of this section, any resolution reported to the Senate or the House of Representatives pursuant to the provisions of section 125 of title 10, United States Code, shall be treated for the purpose of consideration by either House, in the same manner as a resolution with respect to a reorganization plan re- ported by a committee within the meaning of the Reor- ganization Act of 1949 as in effect on July 1, 1958 (5 U.S.C. 133z and the following) [63 Stat. 203; 71 Stat. 611], and shall be governed by the provisions applicable to the consideration of any such resolution by either House of the Congress as provided by sections 205 and 206 of that Act [63 Stat. 207]. ‘‘(b) The provisions of this section are enacted by the Congress— ‘‘(1) as an exercise of the rule-making power of the Senate and the House of Representatives, respec- tively, and as such they shall be considered as part of the rules of each House, respectively, and supersede other rules only to the extent that they are incon- sistent therewith; and ‘‘(2) with full recognition of the constitutional right of either House to change the rules (as far as re- lating to the procedure in that House) at any time, in the same manner and to the same extent as in the case of any other rule of that House.’’ § 125a. Reform: improvement of efficacy and effi- ciency (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall take such action as is necessary to reform the Department of Defense to improve the effi- cacy and efficiency of the Department, and to improve the ability of the Department to prioritize among and assess the costs and bene- fits of covered elements of reform. (b) POLICY.—The Secretary shall develop a pol- icy and issue guidance to implement reform within the Department and to improve the abil- ity of the Department to prioritize among and assess the costs and benefits of covered elements of reform. (c) FRAMEWORK FOR REFORM.— (1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than February 1, 2023, the Secretary shall establish policies, Page 144 TITLE 10—ARMED FORCES § 125a guidance, and a consistent reporting frame- work to measure the progress of the Depart- ment toward covered elements of reform, in- cluding by establishing categories of reform, consistent metrics, and a process for prioritization of reform activities. (2) SCOPE.—The framework required by para- graph (1) may address duties under the fol- lowing: (A) Section 125 of this title. (B) Section 192 of this title. (C) Section 2222 of this title. (D) Section 1124 of title 31. (E) Section 11319 of title 40. (3) CONSULTATION.—The Secretary shall con- sult with the Deputy Secretary of Defense, the Performance Improvement Officer of the De- partment of Defense, the Chief Data Officer of the Department of Defense, the Chief Informa- tion Officer of the Department of Defense, the Director for Administration and Management of the Department of Defense, and the finan- cial managers of the military departments in carrying out activities under this subsection. (d) COVERED ELEMENTS OF REFORM.—For pur- poses of this section and the policies, guidance, and reporting framework required by subsection (c), covered elements of reform may include the following: (1) Business systems modernization. (2) Enterprise business operations process re- engineering. (3) Expanded and modernized collection, management, dissemination, and visualization of data to support decision-making at all lev- els of the enterprise. (4) Improvements in workforce training and education and increasing capabilities of the Department workforce to support and execute reform activities and business processes. (5) Improvements to decision-making proc- esses to enable cost savings, cost avoidance, or investments to develop process improvements. (6) Development and implementation of a uniform methodology for tracking and assess- ing cost savings and cost avoidance from re- form initiatives. (7) Implementation of reform-focused re- search to improve management and adminis- trative science. (8) Tracking and implementation of techno- logical approaches to improve management decision-making, such as artificial intel- ligence tools. (9) Such other elements as the Secretary considers appropriate. (e) ANNUAL REPORT.—At the same time the budget of the President for a fiscal year is sub- mitted to Congress pursuant to section 1105 of title 31, the Secretary shall, using the policies, guidance, and reporting framework required by subsection (c), submit to the congressional de- fense committees a report, including detailed narrative justifications and tradeoff analyses between options, on the actions of the Depart- ment as follows: (1) The activities, expenditures, and accom- plishments carried out or made to effect re- form under this section during the fiscal year in which such budget is submitted. (2) The proposed activities, expenditures, and accomplishments to effect reform under this section, and consistent with priorities es- tablished by the Secretary, during the fiscal year covered by such budget and each of the four succeeding fiscal years. (Added Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title IX, § 911(a)(1), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 3800; amended Pub. L. 117–263, div. A, title IX, § 911, Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 2750.) Editorial Notes AMENDMENTS 2022—Subsec. (c)(1). Pub. L. 117–263, § 911(1)(A), sub- stituted ‘‘2023’’ for ‘‘2022’’. Subsec. (c)(3). Pub. L. 117–263, § 911(1)(B), inserted ‘‘the Director for Administration and Management of the Department of Defense,’’ after ‘‘the Chief Informa- tion Officer of the Department of Defense,’’. Subsec. (d)(6) to (9). Pub. L. 117–263, § 911(2), added pars. (6) to (8) and redesignated former par. (6) as (9). Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT DASHBOARD DEMONSTRATION Pub. L. 117–263, div. A, title IX, § 916, Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 2755, provided that: ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act [Dec. 23, 2022], the Secretary of Defense shall conduct a demonstration of a strategic management dashboard to automate the data collection and data visualization of the primary management goals of the Department of Defense. ‘‘(b) ELEMENTS.—The Secretary of Defense shall en- sure that the strategic management dashboard dem- onstrated under subsection (a) includes the following: ‘‘(1) The capability for real-time monitoring of the performance of the Department of Defense in meeting the management goals of the Department. ‘‘(2) An integrated analytics capability, including the ability to dynamically add or upgrade new capa- bilities when needed. ‘‘(3) Integration with the framework required by subsection (c) of section 125a of title 10, United States Code, for measuring the progress of the Department toward covered elements of reform (as defined in sub- section (d) of that section). ‘‘(4) Incorporation of the elements of the strategic management plan required by section 904(d) of the National Defense Authorization Act of Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 10 U.S.C. note prec. 2201), as derived from automated data feeds from existing in- formation systems and databases. ‘‘(5) Incorporation of the elements of the most re- cent annual performance plan of the Department re- quired by section 1115(b) of title 31, United States Code, and the most recent update on performance of the Department required by section 1116 of that title. ‘‘(6) Use of artificial intelligence and machine learning tools to improve decision making and as- sessment relating to data analytics. ‘‘(7) Adoption of leading and lagging indicators for key strategic management goals. ‘‘(c) AUTHORITIES.— ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—In conducting the demonstration required by subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense may use the authorities described in paragraph (2), and such other authorities as the Secretary considers appropriate— ‘‘(A) to help accelerate the development of inno- vative technological or process approaches; and ‘‘(B) to attract new entrants to solve the data management and visualization challenges of the Department. ‘‘(2) AUTHORITIES DESCRIBED.—The authorities de- scribed in this paragraph are the authorities provided under the following provisions of law: Page 145 TITLE 10—ARMED FORCES § 127 ‘‘(A) Section 4025 of title 10, United States Code (relating to prizes for advanced technology achieve- ments). ‘‘(B) Section 217 of the National Defense Author- ization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 10 U.S.C. 2222 note) (relating to science and tech- nology activities to support business systems infor- mation technology acquisition programs). ‘‘(C) Section 908 of the National Defense Author- ization Act for Fiscal Year 2022 (Public Law 117–81; 10 U.S.C. 129a note) (relating to management inno- vation activities). ‘‘(d) USE OF BEST PRACTICES.—In conducting the dem- onstration required by subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall leverage commercial best practices in management and leading research in management and data science. ‘‘(e) STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT DASHBOARD DEFINED.— In this section, the term ‘strategic management dash- board’ means a system for dynamically displaying management metrics, performance goals, and other in- formation necessary for Department of Defense leader- ship to make strategic decisions related to the manage- ment of the Department using modern, commercial practices for data visualization and drawn from exist- ing automated information systems available to the Department.’’ IMPLEMENTING POLICIES, GUIDANCE, AND REPORTING FRAMEWORK Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title IX, § 911(b), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 3801, provided that: ‘‘(1) SUBMITTAL TO CONGRESS.—Not later than March 1, 2022, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees [Committees on Armed Services and Appropriations of the Senate and the House of Representatives] a report setting forth the policies, guidance, and reporting framework estab- lished pursuant to subsection (c) of section 125a of title 10, United States Code (as added by subsection (a) of this section). ‘‘(2) UPDATE.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the submittal to Congress of the report required by sec- tion 901(d) of this Act [10 U.S.C. 132a note], the Sec- retary shall update the reporting framework referred to in paragraph (1).’’ § 126. Transfer of funds and employees (a) When a function, power, or duty or an ac- tivity of a department or agency of the Depart- ment of Defense is transferred or assigned to an- other department or agency of that department, balances of appropriations that the Secretary of Defense determines are available and needed to finance or discharge that function, power, duty, or activity, as the case may be, may, with the approval of the President, be transferred to the department or agency to which that function, power, duty or activity, as the case may be, is transferred, and used for any purpose for which those appropriations were originally available. Balances of appropriations so transferred shall— (1) be credited to any applicable appropria- tion account of the receiving department or agency; or (2) be credited to a new account that may be established on the books of the Department of the Treasury; and be merged with the funds already credited to that account and accounted for as one fund. Balances of appropriations credited to an ac- count under clause (1) are subject only to such limitations as are specifically applicable to that account. Balances of appropriations credited to an account under clause (2) are subject only to such limitations as are applicable to the appro- priations from which they are transferred. (b) When a function, power, or duty or an ac- tivity of a department or agency of the Depart- ment of Defense is transferred to another de- partment or agency of that department, those civilian employees of the department or agency from which the transfer is made that the Sec- retary of Defense determines are needed to per- form that function, power, or duty, or for that activity, as the case may be, may, with the ap- proval of the President, be transferred to the de- partment or agency to which that function, power, duty, or activity, as the case may be, is transferred. The authorized strength in civilian employees of a department or agency from which employees are transferred under this sec- tion is reduced by the number of employees so transferred. The authorized strength in civilian employees of a department or agency to which employees are transferred under this section is increased by the number of employees so trans- ferred. (Added Pub. L. 87–651, title II, § 201(a), Sept. 7, 1962, 76 Stat. 516; amended Pub. L. 96–513, title V, § 511(2), Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 2920.) HISTORICAL AND REVISION NOTES Revised section Source (U.S. Code) Source (Statutes at Large) 126(a) ...... 126(b) ...... 5:172f(a). 5:171n(a) (as applicable to 5:172f(a)). 5:172f (less (a)). July 26, 1947, ch. 343, § 407; added Aug. 10, 1949, ch. 412, § 11 (21st and 22d pars.), 63 Stat. 589. July 26, 1947, ch. 343, § 308(a) (as applicable to § 407), 61 Stat. 509. In subsection (a), the words ‘‘under authority of law’’ are omitted as surplusage. The following substitutions are made: ‘‘needed’’ for ‘‘necessary’’; ‘‘used’’ for ‘‘be available for use by’’; and ‘‘those appropriations’’ for ‘‘said funds’’. In subsection (b), 5 U.S.C. 172f(b) is restated to reflect more clearly its purpose to authorize ‘‘transfers of per- sonnel’’ (Senate Report No. 366, 81st Congress, p. 23). Editorial Notes AMENDMENTS 1980—Subsec. (b) Pub. L. 96–513 substituted ‘‘Presi- dent’’ for ‘‘Director of the Bureau of the Budget’’. Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1980 AMENDMENT Amendment by Pub. L. 96–513 effective Dec. 12, 1980, see section 701(b)(3) of Pub. L. 96–513, set out as a note under section 101 of this title. Executive Documents DELEGATION OF FUNCTIONS Authority of President under subsec. (a) of this sec- tion to approve transfers of balances of appropriations provided for therein delegated to Director of Office of Management and Budget, see section 9(2) of Ex. Ord. No. 11609, July 22, 1971, 36 F.R. 13747, set out as a note under section 301 of Title 3, The President. § 127. Emergency and extraordinary expenses (a) Subject to the limitations of subsection (c), and within the limitation of appropriations made for the purpose, the Secretary of Defense,

Cross-references

Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

10 U.S.C. § 125a — Reform: improvement of efficacy and efficiency

**(a) In General.—** The Secretary of Defense shall take such action as is necessary to reform the Department of Defense to improve the efficacy and efficiency of the Department, and to improve the ability of the Department to prioritize among and assess the costs and benefits of covered elements of reform. **(b) Policy.—** The Secretary shall develop a policy and issue guidance to implement reform within the Department and to improve the ability of the Department to prioritize among and assess the costs and benefits of covered elements of reform. **(c) Framework for Reform.—** (1) **In general.—** — Not later than February 1, 2023, the Secretary shall establish policies, guidance, and a consistent reporting framework to measure the progress of the Department toward covered elements of reform, including by establishing categories of reform, consistent metrics, and a process for prioritization of reform activities. (2) **Scope.—** — The framework required by paragraph (1) may address duties under the following: (A) [Section 125 of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title10-section125&num=0&edition=prelim). (B) [Section 192 of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title10-section192&num=0&edition=prelim). (C) [Section 2222 of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title10-section2222&num=0&edition=prelim). (D) [Section 1124 of title 31](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title31-section1124&num=0&edition=prelim). (E) [Section 11319 of title 40](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title40-section11319&num=0&edition=prelim). (3) **Consultation.—** — The Secretary shall consult with the Deputy Secret

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 10 U.S.C. § 125a

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

10 U.S.C. § 129a — General policy for total force management

**(a) Policies and Procedures.—** The Secretary of Defense shall establish policies and procedures for determining the most appropriate and cost efficient mix of military, civilian, and contractor personnel to perform the mission of the Department of Defense. **(b) Risk Mitigation Over Cost.—** In establishing the policies and procedures under subsection (a), the Secretary shall clearly provide that attainment of a Department of Defense workforce sufficiently sized and comprised of the appropriate mix of personnel necessary to carry out the mission of the Department and the core mission areas of the armed forces takes precedence over cost. The Secretary may not reduce the civilian workforce programmed full-time equivalent levels, or conduct any reductions or realignments that occur outside the normal programming process (including ad hoc, immediate, or unprogrammed changes) of 50 employees or more implemented before or after the submission of the annual budget request, unless the Secretary conducts an appropriate analysis of the impacts of such reductions on workload, military force structure, lethality, readiness, operational effectiveness, stress on the military force, and fully burdened costs. **(c) Delegation of Responsibilities.—** The Secretary shall delegate responsibility for implementation of the policies and procedures established under subsection (a) as follows: (1) The Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness shall have overall responsibility for guidance to implement such policies and procedures. (2) The Secretaries of the military departments and the heads of the Defense Agencies shall have overall responsibility for the requirements determination, planning, programming, and budgeting for such policies and procedures. The Secretary of Def

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 10 U.S.C. § 129a

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. The source passage cites 10 U.S.C. § 129a. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

10 U.S.C. § 129a — General policy for total force management

Page 158 TITLE 10—ARMED FORCES § 129a Stat. 2658, 2735; Pub. L. 105–85, div. A, title XI, § 1101, Nov. 18, 1997, 111 Stat. 1922; Pub. L. 106–65, div. A, title X, § 1067(1), Oct. 5, 1999, 113 Stat. 774; Pub. L. 112–81, div. A, title IX, § 932, Dec. 31, 2011, 125 Stat. 1543; Pub. L. 114–328, div. A, title XI, § 1101(a), (b)(1), Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2443; Pub. L. 116–92, div. A, title XI, § 1103, Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 1596; Pub. L. 117–81, div. A, title XI, § 1102, Dec. 27, 2021, 135 Stat. 1949.) Editorial Notes AMENDMENTS 2021—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 117–81, in first sentence, substituted ‘‘solely’’ for ‘‘primarily’’ and, in second sentence, struck out ‘‘solely’’ after ‘‘shall not be sub- ject’’. 2019—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 116–92, § 1103(1), in first sen- tence, substituted ‘‘each fiscal year primarily’’ for ‘‘each fiscal year’’, and in second sentence, substituted ‘‘The management of such personnel in any fiscal year shall not be subject solely to any’’ for ‘‘Any’’ and struck out ‘‘shall be developed on the basis of those fac- tors and shall be subject to adjustment solely for rea- sons of changed circumstances’’ after ‘‘number of em- ployees’’. Subsec. (c)(2)(A). Pub. L. 116–92, § 1103(2)(A), inserted ‘‘and associated cost’’ after ‘‘projected size’’. Subsec. (c)(2)(B). Pub. L. 116–92, § 1103(2), inserted ‘‘and associated cost’’ after ‘‘projected size’’ in two places and substituted ‘‘to reduce the overall costs of the total force of military, civilian, and contract workforces.’’ for ‘‘that have been taken to identify off- setting reductions and avoid unnecessary overall growth in the size of the civilian workforce.’’ 2016—Pub. L. 114–328, § 1101(b)(1), amended section catchline generally, substituting ‘‘Civilian personnel management’’ for

Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 10 U.S.C. § 129a

Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. The source passage cites 10 U.S.C. § 129a. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

10 U.S.C. § 132a — Performance Improvement Officer

**(a) Establishment.—** (1) There is a Performance Improvement Officer of the Department of Defense, to be appointed by the Secretary of Defense from among the ranks of qualified individuals from the senior career civil service. (2) The Performance Improvement Officer shall be appointed from among persons described in paragraph (1) who have an extensive management or business background and experience with managing large or complex organizations, organizational change management, or business transformation activities. **(b) Deputy.—** The Performance Improvement Officer shall be supported by a Deputy who shall be appointed by the Secretary of Defense from among the ranks of qualified individuals from the senior career civil service. The Deputy shall be the first assistant to the Performance Improvement Officer and shall assist that Officer in the performance of the duties of that position and shall act for, and exercise the powers of, the Officer when that Officer dies, resigns, or is otherwise unable to perform the functions and duties of the office. **(c) Duties and Responsibilities.—** Subject to the authority, direction, and control of the Secretary of Defense and the Deputy Secretary of Defense, the Performance Improvement Officer shall perform such duties, exercise such powers, and have such responsibilities as the Secretary or the Deputy Secretary may prescribe, including the following: (1) Responsibility for updating and implementing the Strategic Management Plan of the Department of Defense required by section 904(d) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 10 U.S.C. note prec. 2201). (2) Responsibility for chairing the Defense Performance Improvement Council (or any successor organization). (3) Responsibility f

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 10 U.S.C. § 132a

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. The source passage cites 10 U.S.C. § 132a. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

10 U.S.C. § 132a — Performance improvement officer 1

Page 185 TITLE 10—ARMED FORCES § 132a 1 So in original. Probably should be capitalized as ‘‘Perform- ance Improvement Officer’’. 2 So in original. Probably should be ‘‘for’’. § 132a. Performance improvement officer 1 (a) ESTABLISHMENT.— (1) There is a Performance Improvement Of- ficer of the Department of Defense, to be ap- pointed by the Secretary of Defense from among the ranks of qualified individuals from the senior career civil service. (2) The Performance Improvement Officer shall be appointed from among persons de- scribed in paragraph (1) who have an extensive management or business background and expe- rience with managing large or complex organi- zations, organizational change management, or business transformation activities. (b) DEPUTY.—The Performance Improvement Officer shall be supported by a Deputy who shall be appointed by the Secretary of Defense from among the ranks of qualified individuals from the senior career civil service. The Deputy shall be the first assistant to the Performance Im- provement Officer and shall assist that Officer in the performance of the duties of that position and shall act for, and exercise the powers of, the Officer when that Officer dies, resigns, or is oth- erwise unable to perform the functions and du- ties of the office. (c) DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES.—Subject to the authority, direction, and control of the Sec- retary of Defense and the Deputy Secretary of Defense, the Performance Improvement Officer shall perform such duties, exercise such powers, and have such responsibilities as the Secretary or the Deputy Secretary may prescribe, includ- ing the following: (1) Responsibility for updating and imple- menting the Strategic Management Plan of the Department of Defense required by section 904

Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 10 U.S.C. § 132a

Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. The source passage cites 10 U.S.C. § 132a. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

10 U.S.C. § 2222 — Defense business systems: business process reengineering; enterprise architecture; management

**(a) Defense Business Processes Generally.—** The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that defense business processes are reviewed, and as appropriate revised, through business process reengineering to match best commercial practices, to the maximum extent practicable, so as to minimize customization of commercial business systems. **(b) Defense Business Systems Generally.—** The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that each covered defense business system developed, deployed, and operated by the Department of Defense— (1) supports efficient business processes that have been reviewed, and as appropriate revised, through business process reengineering; (2) is integrated into a comprehensive defense business enterprise architecture; (3) is managed in a manner that provides visibility into, and traceability of, expenditures for the system; and (4) uses an acquisition and sustainment strategy that prioritizes the use of commercial software and business practices. **(c) Issuance of Guidance.—** (1) **Secretary of defense guidance.—** — The Secretary shall issue guidance to provide for the coordination of, and decision making for, the planning, programming, and control of investments in covered defense business systems. (2) **Supporting guidance.—** — The Secretary shall direct the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment, and the Chief Information Officer of each of the military departments to issue and maintain supporting guidance, as appropriate and within their respective areas of responsibility, for the guidance of the Secretary issued under paragraph (1). **(d) Guidance Elements.—** The guidance issued under subsection (c) shall include the following elements: (1) Policy to ensure that

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 10 U.S.C. § 2222

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. The source passage cites 10 U.S.C. § 2222. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

10 U.S.C. § 2222 — Defense business systems: business proc-

Page 1762 TITLE 10—ARMED FORCES [§ 2221 days after the date on which such final regulations are published.’’ PILOT PROGRAMS FOR TESTING PROGRAM MANAGER PERFORMANCE OF PRODUCT SUPPORT OVERSIGHT RE- SPONSIBILITIES FOR LIFE CYCLE OF ACQUISITION PRO- GRAMS Pub. L. 105–261, div. A, title VIII, § 816, Oct. 17, 1998, 112 Stat. 2088, authorized the Secretary of Defense to designate 10 acquisition programs of the military de- partments as pilot programs on program manager re- sponsibility for product support and required report to Congress by Feb. 1, 1999. ENHANCED SYSTEM OF PERFORMANCE INCENTIVES Pub. L. 103–355, title V, § 5001(b), Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 3350, provided that, within one year after Oct. 13, 1994, the Secretary of Defense should review the incentives and personnel actions available for encouraging excel- lence in the management of defense acquisition pro- grams and provide an enhanced system of incentives, including pay for performance, to facilitate the achievement of goals approved or defined pursuant to subsec. (a) of this section. RECOMMENDED LEGISLATION Pub. L. 103–355, title V, § 5001(c), Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 3350, directed the Secretary of Defense, not later than one year after Oct 13, 1994, to submit to Congress any recommended legislation that the Secretary considered necessary to carry out this section and otherwise to fa- cilitate and enhance management of Department of De- fense acquisition programs on the basis of performance. [§ 2221. Repealed. Pub. L. 105–261, div. A, title IX, § 906(f)(1), Oct. 17, 1998, 112 Stat. 2096] Section, added Pub. L. 104–106, div. A, title IX, § 914(a)(1), Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 412; amended Pub. L. 104–201, div. A, title X, § 1008(a), Sept. 23, 1996, 110 Stat. 2633; Pub. L. 105–85, div.

Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 10 U.S.C. § 2222

Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. The source passage cites 10 U.S.C. § 2222. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

50 U.S.C. § 3002 — Report on best practices to protect privacy, civil liberties, and civil rights of Chinese Americans

**(a) Sense of Congress** It is the sense of Congress that— (1) the People’s Republic of China appears to be specifically targeting the Chinese-American community for intelligence purposes; (2) such targeting carries a substantial risk that the loyalty of such Americans may be generally questioned and lead to unacceptable stereotyping, targeting, and racial profiling; (3) the United States Government has a duty to warn and protect all Americans including those of Chinese descent from these intelligence efforts by the People’s Republic of China; (4) the broad stereotyping, targeting, and racial profiling of Americans of Chinese descent is contrary to the values of the United States and reinforces the flawed narrative perpetuated by the People’s Republic of China that ethnically Chinese individuals worldwide have a duty to support the People’s Republic of China; and (5) the United States efforts to combat the People’s Republic of China’s intelligence activities should actively safeguard and promote the constitutional rights of all Chinese Americans. **(b) Report** On an annual basis, the Director of National Intelligence, acting through the Office of Civil Liberties, Privacy, and Transparency, in coordination with the civil liberties and privacy officers of the elements of the intelligence community, shall submit a report to the congressional intelligence committees containing— (1) a review of how the policies, procedures, and practices of the intelligence community that govern the intelligence activities and operations targeting the People’s Republic of China affect policies, procedures, and practices relating to the privacy, civil liberties, and civil rights of Americans of Chinese descent who may be targets of espionage and influence operations by China; and (2

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 50 U.S.C. § 3002

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. The source passage cites 50 U.S.C. § 3002. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

50 U.S.C. § 3002 — Congressional declaration of purpose

Page 558 TITLE 50—WAR AND NATIONAL DEFENSE § 3002 as those required by FISA and Executive Order 12333. This order is not intended to alter the rules applicable to United States persons adopted pursuant to FISA, Executive Order 12333, or other applicable law. (f) This order shall apply to signals intelligence ac- tivities consistent with the scope of PPD–28’s applica- tion to such activities prior to PPD–28’s partial revoca- tion by the national security memorandum issued con- currently with this order. To implement this sub- section, the head of each agency containing an element of the Intelligence Community, in consultation with the Attorney General and the Director, is hereby dele- gated the authority to issue guidance, which may be classified, as appropriate, as to the scope of application of this order with respect to the element or elements of the Intelligence Community within their agency. The CLPO and the Data Protection Review Court, in car- rying out the functions assigned to it under this order, shall treat such guidance as authoritative and binding. (g) Nothing in this order confers authority to declas- sify or disclose classified national security information except as authorized pursuant to Executive Order 13526 or any successor order. Consistent with the require- ments of Executive Order 13526, the CLPO, the Data Protection Review Court, and the special advocates shall not have authority to declassify classified na- tional security information, nor shall they disclose any classified or otherwise privileged or protected informa- tion except to authorized and appropriately cleared in- dividuals who have a need to know the information. (h) This order creates an entitlement to submit quali- fying complaints to the CLPO and to obtain review of

Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 50 U.S.C. § 3002

Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. The source passage cites 50 U.S.C. § 3002. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

50 U.S.C. § 401 — Transferred

### Statutory Notes #### Codification Section 442a, comprising section 1102 of the National Security Act of 1947, act July 26, 1947, ch. 343, was editorially reclassified as [section 3232 of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title50-section3232&num=0&edition=prelim).

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 50 U.S.C. § 401

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. The source passage cites 50 U.S.C. § 401. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.