Browse Arkansas Code titles and sections
41 U.S.C. § 4712 — Enhancement of contractor protection
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 144
TITLE 41—PUBLIC CONTRACTS
§ 4711
(b)
REGULATIONS.—For
executive
agencies
other than the Department of Defense, the Fed-
eral Acquisition Regulation shall—
(1) require contractors to minimize the ex-
cessive use of subcontractors, or of tiers of
subcontractors, that add no or negligible
value; and
(2) ensure that neither a contractor nor a
subcontractor receives indirect costs or profit
on work performed by a lower-tier subcon-
tractor to which the higher-tier contractor or
subcontractor adds no or negligible value (but
not to limit charges for indirect costs and
profit based on the direct costs of managing
lower-tier subcontracts).
(c) COVERED CONTRACTS.—This section applies
to any cost-reimbursement type contract or
task or delivery order in an amount greater
than the simplified acquisition threshold (as de-
fined by section 134 of this title).
(d) RULE
OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this
section shall be construed as limiting the ability
of the Department of Defense to implement
more restrictive limitations on the tiering of
subcontractors.
(e) APPLICABILITY.—The Department of De-
fense shall continue to be subject to guidance on
limitations on tiering of subcontractors issued
by the Department of Defense pursuant to sec-
tion 852 of the John Warner National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public
Law 109–364, 10 U.S.C. 2324 note).
(Pub. L. 111–350, § 3, Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 3800.)
HISTORICAL AND REVISION NOTES
Revised
Section
Source (U.S. Code)
Source (Statutes at Large)
4710 ............
41:254b note.
Pub. L. 110–417, [div. A],
title VIII, § 866, Oct. 14,
2008, 122 Stat. 4551.
In subsection (b), the words ‘‘Not later than one year
after the date of the enactment of this Act’’ are omit-
ted because of sectio
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 41 U.S.C. § 4712
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.
Original supplied file — preserved unchanged
Download original Markdown file
File SHA-256: 0eadda714ec16dba5c991c1253c670b7d0f8ec85e372496e44a0722ae1975bc5. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.
Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.
Open the recorded source website ↗
Record provenance
Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:usc2024-283768165dc206f43547d8c4
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code-2024/title-41/section-4712-enhancement-of-contractor-protection--484877766f.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: 9e67b08aa27f8cd42793a2afa7b8e44ab0ddefa13daf1c92925de0290a034112
Source location: USCODE-2024-title41-subtitleI-divsnC-chap47-sec4712.pdf
Stored source content
Page 144
TITLE 41—PUBLIC CONTRACTS
§ 4711
(b)
REGULATIONS.—For
executive
agencies
other than the Department of Defense, the Fed-
eral Acquisition Regulation shall—
(1) require contractors to minimize the ex-
cessive use of subcontractors, or of tiers of
subcontractors, that add no or negligible
value; and
(2) ensure that neither a contractor nor a
subcontractor receives indirect costs or profit
on work performed by a lower-tier subcon-
tractor to which the higher-tier contractor or
subcontractor adds no or negligible value (but
not to limit charges for indirect costs and
profit based on the direct costs of managing
lower-tier subcontracts).
(c) COVERED CONTRACTS.—This section applies
to any cost-reimbursement type contract or
task or delivery order in an amount greater
than the simplified acquisition threshold (as de-
fined by section 134 of this title).
(d) RULE
OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this
section shall be construed as limiting the ability
of the Department of Defense to implement
more restrictive limitations on the tiering of
subcontractors.
(e) APPLICABILITY.—The Department of De-
fense shall continue to be subject to guidance on
limitations on tiering of subcontractors issued
by the Department of Defense pursuant to sec-
tion 852 of the John Warner National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public
Law 109–364, 10 U.S.C. 2324 note).
(Pub. L. 111–350, § 3, Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 3800.)
HISTORICAL AND REVISION NOTES
Revised
Section
Source (U.S. Code)
Source (Statutes at Large)
4710 ............
41:254b note.
Pub. L. 110–417, [div. A],
title VIII, § 866, Oct. 14,
2008, 122 Stat. 4551.
In subsection (b), the words ‘‘Not later than one year
after the date of the enactment of this Act’’ are omit-
ted because of section 6(f) of the bill. The word ‘‘shall’’
is substituted for the words ‘‘shall be amended’’ to re-
flect the permanence of the provision.
§ 4711. Linking of award and incentive fees to ac-
quisition outcomes
(a) DEFINITION.—In this section, the term ‘‘ex-
ecutive agency’’ has the same meaning given in
section 133 of this title.
(b) GUIDANCE
FOR
EXECUTIVE
AGENCIES
ON
LINKING OF AWARD AND INCENTIVE FEES TO AC-
QUISITION OUTCOMES.—The Federal Acquisition
Regulation shall provide executive agencies
other than the Department of Defense with in-
structions, including definitions, on the appro-
priate use of award and incentive fees in Federal
acquisition programs.
(c) ELEMENTS.—The regulations under sub-
section (b) shall—
(1) ensure that all new contracts using award
fees link the fees to acquisition outcomes
(which shall be defined in terms of program
cost, schedule, and performance);
(2) establish standards for identifying the
appropriate level of officials authorized to ap-
prove the use of award and incentive fees in
new contracts;
(3) provide guidance on the circumstances in
which contractor performance may be judged
to be ‘‘excellent’’ or ‘‘superior’’ and the per-
centage of the available award fee which con-
tractors should be paid for the performance;
(4) establish standards for determining the
percentage of the available award fee, if any,
which contractors should be paid for perform-
ance that is judged to be ‘‘acceptable’’, ‘‘aver-
age’’, ‘‘expected’’, ‘‘good’’, or ‘‘satisfactory’’;
(5) ensure that no award fee may be paid for
contractor performance that is judged to be
below satisfactory performance or perform-
ance that does not meet the basic require-
ments of the contract;
(6) provide specific direction on the cir-
cumstances, if any, in which it may be appro-
priate to roll over award fees that are not
earned in one award fee period to a subsequent
award fee period or periods;
(7) ensure consistent use of guidelines and
definitions relating to award and incentive
fees across the Federal Government;
(8) ensure that each executive agency—
(A) collects relevant data on award and in-
centive fees paid to contractors; and
(B) has mechanisms in place to evaluate
the data on a regular basis;
(9) include performance measures to evalu-
ate the effectiveness of award and incentive
fees as a tool for improving contractor per-
formance and achieving desired program out-
comes; and
(10) provide mechanisms for sharing proven
incentive strategies for the acquisition of dif-
ferent types of products and services among
contracting and program management offi-
cials.
(d) GUIDANCE FOR DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE.—
The Department of Defense shall continue to be
subject to guidance on award and incentive fees
issued by the Secretary of Defense pursuant to
section 814 of the John Warner National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public
Law 109–364, 10 U.S.C. 2302 note).
(Pub. L. 111–350, § 3, Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 3800.)
HISTORICAL AND REVISION NOTES
Revised
Section
Source (U.S. Code)
Source (Statutes at Large)
4711 ............
41:251 note.
Pub. L. 110–417, [div. A],
title VIII, § 867, Oct. 14,
2008, 122 Stat. 4551.
In subsection (b), the words ‘‘Not later than 1 year
after the date of the enactment of this Act’’ are omit-
ted because of section 6(f) of the bill. The words ‘‘shall
provide’’ are substituted for ‘‘shall be amended to pro-
vide’’ to reflect the permanence of the provision.
§ 4712. Enhancement of contractor protection
from reprisal for disclosure of certain infor-
mation
(a) PROHIBITION OF REPRISALS.—
(1) IN
GENERAL.—An employee of a con-
tractor, subcontractor, grantee, subgrantee, or
personal services contractor may not be dis-
charged, demoted, or otherwise discriminated
against as a reprisal for disclosing to a person
or body described in paragraph (2) information
that the employee reasonably believes is evi-
dence of gross mismanagement of a Federal
contract or grant, a gross waste of Federal
Page 145
TITLE 41—PUBLIC CONTRACTS
§ 4712
funds, an abuse of authority relating to a Fed-
eral contract or grant, a substantial and spe-
cific danger to public health or safety, or a
violation of law, rule, or regulation related to
a Federal contract (including the competition
for or negotiation of a contract) or grant.
(2) PERSONS AND BODIES COVERED.—The per-
sons and bodies described in this paragraph are
the persons and bodies as follows:
(A) A Member of Congress or a representa-
tive of a committee of Congress.
(B) An Inspector General.
(C) The Government Accountability Office.
(D) A Federal employee responsible for
contract or grant oversight or management
at the relevant agency.
(E) An authorized official of the Depart-
ment of Justice or other law enforcement
agency.
(F) A court or grand jury.
(G) A management official or other em-
ployee of the contractor, subcontractor,
grantee, subgrantee, or personal services
contractor who has the responsibility to in-
vestigate, discover, or address misconduct.
(3) RULES
OF
CONSTRUCTION.—For the pur-
poses of paragraph (1)—
(A) an employee who initiates or provides
evidence
of
contractor,
subcontractor,
grantee, subgrantee, or personal services
contractor misconduct in any judicial or ad-
ministrative proceeding relating to waste,
fraud, or abuse on a Federal contract or
grant shall be deemed to have made a disclo-
sure covered by such paragraph; and
(B) a reprisal described in paragraph (1) is
prohibited even if it is undertaken at the re-
quest of an executive branch official, unless
the request takes the form of a non-discre-
tionary directive and is within the authority
of the executive branch official making the
request.
(b) INVESTIGATION OF COMPLAINTS.—
(1) SUBMISSION OF COMPLAINT.—A person who
believes that the person has been subjected to
a reprisal prohibited by subsection (a) may
submit a complaint to the Inspector General
of the executive agency involved. Unless the
Inspector General determines that the com-
plaint is frivolous, fails to allege a violation of
the prohibition in subsection (a), or has pre-
viously been addressed in another Federal or
State judicial or administrative proceeding
initiated by the complainant, the Inspector
General shall investigate the complaint and,
upon completion of such investigation, submit
a report of the findings of the investigation to
the person, the contractor, subcontractor,
grantee, subgrantee, or personal services con-
tractor concerned, and the head of the agency.
(2) INSPECTOR GENERAL ACTION.—
(A) DETERMINATION OR SUBMISSION OF RE-
PORT ON FINDINGS.—Except as provided under
subparagraph (B), the Inspector General
shall make a determination that a com-
plaint is frivolous, fails to allege a violation
of the prohibition in subsection (a), or has
previously been addressed in another Fed-
eral or State judicial or administrative pro-
ceeding initiated by the complainant or sub-
mit a report under paragraph (1) within 180
days after receiving the complaint.
(B) EXTENSION OF TIME.—If the Inspector
General is unable to complete an investiga-
tion in time to submit a report within the
180-day period specified in subparagraph (A)
and the person submitting the complaint
agrees to an extension of time, the Inspector
General shall submit a report under para-
graph (1) within such additional period of
time, up to 180 days, as shall be agreed upon
between the Inspector General and the per-
son submitting the complaint.
(3) PROHIBITION ON DISCLOSURE.—The Inspec-
tor General may not respond to any inquiry or
disclose any information from or about any
person alleging the reprisal, except to the ex-
tent that such response or disclosure is—
(A) made with the consent of the person al-
leging the reprisal;
(B) made in accordance with the provisions
of section 552a of title 5 or as required by
any other applicable Federal law; or
(C) necessary to conduct an investigation
of the alleged reprisal.
(4) TIME LIMITATION.—A complaint may not
be brought under this subsection more than
three years after the date on which the alleged
reprisal took place.
(c) REMEDY AND ENFORCEMENT AUTHORITY.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 30 days after
receiving an Inspector General report pursu-
ant to subsection (b), the head of the executive
agency concerned shall determine whether
there is sufficient basis to conclude that the
contractor,
subcontractor,
grantee,
sub-
grantee, or personal services contractor con-
cerned has subjected the complainant to a re-
prisal prohibited by subsection (a) and shall
either issue an order denying relief or shall
take one or more of the following actions:
(A) Order the contractor, subcontractor,
grantee, subgrantee, or personal services
contractor to take affirmative action to
abate the reprisal.
(B) Order the contractor, subcontractor,
grantee, subgrantee, or personal services
contractor to reinstate the person to the po-
sition that the person held before the re-
prisal, together with compensatory damages
(including back pay), employment benefits,
and other terms and conditions of employ-
ment that would apply to the person in that
position if the reprisal had not been taken.
(C) Order the contractor, subcontractor,
grantee, subgrantee, or personal services
contractor to pay the complainant an
amount equal to the aggregate amount of all
costs and expenses (including attorneys’ fees
and expert witnesses’ fees) that were reason-
ably incurred by the complainant for, or in
connection with, bringing the complaint re-
garding the reprisal, as determined by the
head of the executive agency.
(D) Consider disciplinary or corrective ac-
tion against any official of the executive
agency, if appropriate.
(2) EXHAUSTION OF REMEDIES.—If the head of
an executive agency issues an order denying
Page 146
TITLE 41—PUBLIC CONTRACTS
§ 4712
1 So in original.
relief under paragraph (1) or has not issued an
order within 210 days after the submission of a
complaint under subsection (b), or in the case
of an extension of time under paragraph
(b)(2)(B), not later than 30 days after the expi-
ration of the extension of time, and there is no
showing that such delay is due to the bad faith
of the complainant, the complainant shall be
deemed to have exhausted all administrative
remedies with respect to the complaint, and
the complainant may bring a de novo action
at law or equity against the contractor, sub-
contractor, grantee, subgrantee, or personal
services contractor to seek compensatory
damages and other relief available under this
section in the appropriate district court of the
United States, which shall have jurisdiction
over such an action without regard to the
amount in controversy. Such an action shall,
at the request of either party to the action, be
tried by the court with a jury. An action under
this paragraph may not be brought more than
two years after the date on which remedies are
deemed to have been exhausted.
(3) ADMISSIBILITY OF EVIDENCE.—An Inspec-
tor General determination and an agency head
order denying relief under paragraph (2) shall
be admissible in evidence in any de novo ac-
tion at law or equity brought pursuant to this
subsection.
(4) ENFORCEMENT
OF
ORDERS.—Whenever a
person fails to comply with an order issued
under paragraph (1), the head of the executive
agency concerned shall file an action for en-
forcement of such order in the United States
district court for a district in which the re-
prisal was found to have occurred. In any ac-
tion brought under this paragraph, the court
may grant appropriate relief, including injunc-
tive relief, compensatory and exemplary dam-
ages, and attorney fees and costs. The person
upon whose behalf an order was issued may
also file such an action or join in an action
filed by the head of the executive agency.
(5) JUDICIAL REVIEW.—Any person adversely
affected or aggrieved by an order issued under
paragraph (1) may obtain review of the order’s
conformance with this subsection, and any
regulations issued to carry out this section, in
the United States court of appeals for a circuit
in which the reprisal is alleged in the order to
have occurred. No petition seeking such re-
view may be filed more than 60 days after
issuance of the order by the head of the execu-
tive agency. Review shall conform to chapter
7 of title 5. Filing such an appeal shall not act
to stay the enforcement of the order of the
head of an executive agency, unless a stay is
specifically entered by the court.
(6) BURDENS OF PROOF.—The legal burdens of
proof specified in section 1221(e) of title 5 shall
be controlling for the purposes of any inves-
tigation conducted by an Inspector General,
decision by the head of an executive agency,
or judicial or administrative proceeding to de-
termine whether discrimination prohibited
under this section has occurred.
(7) RIGHTS
AND
REMEDIES
NOT
WAIVABLE.—
The rights and remedies provided for in this
section may not be waived by any agreement,
policy, form, or condition of employment.
(d) NOTIFICATION OF EMPLOYEES.—The head of
each executive agency shall ensure that contrac-
tors, subcontractors, grantees, subgrantees, and
personal services contractors of the agency in-
form their employees in writing of the rights
and remedies provided under this section, in the
predominant native language of the workforce.
(e) CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this section
may be construed to authorize the discharge of,
demotion of, or discrimination against an em-
ployee for a disclosure other than a disclosure
protected by subsection (a) or to modify or dero-
gate from a right or remedy otherwise available
to the employee.
(f) EXCEPTIONS.—(1) This section shall not
apply to any element of the intelligence commu-
nity, as defined in section 3(4) of the National
Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 401a(4)).
(2) This section shall not apply to any disclo-
sure made by an employee of a contractor, sub-
contractor, grantee, subgrantee, or personal
services contractor of an element of the intel-
ligence community if such disclosure—
(A) relates to an activity of an element of
the intelligence community; or
(B) was discovered during contract, sub-
contract, grantee, subgrantee, or personal
services contractor services provided to an ele-
ment of the intelligence community.
(g) DEFINITIONS.—In this section:
(1) The term ‘‘abuse of authority’’ means an
arbitrary and capricious exercise of authority
that is inconsistent with the mission of the ex-
ecutive agency concerned or the successful
performance of a contract or grant of such
agency.
(2) The term ‘‘Inspector General’’ means an
Inspector General appointed under chapter 4 of
title 5 and any Inspector General that receives
funding from, or has oversight over contracts
or grants awarded for or on behalf of, the exec-
utive agency concerned.
(h) CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this section, or
the amendments made by this section,1 shall be
construed to provide any rights to disclose clas-
sified information not otherwise provided by
law.
(Added Pub. L. 112–239, div. A, title VIII,
§ 828(a)(1), Jan. 2, 2013, 126 Stat. 1837; amended
Pub. L. 113–66, div. A, title X, § 1091(e), Dec. 26,
2013, 127 Stat. 876; Pub. L. 114–261, § 1(a)(2), (3)(A),
Dec. 14, 2016, 130 Stat. 1362; Pub. L. 116–260, div.
U, title VIII, § 801, Dec. 27, 2020, 134 Stat. 2297;
Pub. L. 117–263, div. A, title VIII, § 807(b), Dec. 23,
2022, 136 Stat. 2704; Pub. L. 117–286, § 4(b)(74), Dec.
27, 2022, 136 Stat. 4351.)
Editorial Notes
AMENDMENTS
2022—Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 117–263, § 807(b)(1)(A), sub-
stituted ‘‘subgrantee,’’ for ‘‘or subgrantee’’.
Subsec. (a)(2)(G). Pub. L. 117–263, § 807(b)(1)(B), sub-
stituted ‘‘subgrantee, or personal services contractor’’
for ‘‘or subgrantee’’.
Subsec. (a)(3)(A). Pub. L. 117–263, § 807(b)(1)(C), sub-
stituted ‘‘subgrantee, or personal services contractor’’
for ‘‘or subgrantee’’.
Page 147
TITLE 41—PUBLIC CONTRACTS
§ 4713
Subsec. (b)(1). Pub. L. 117–263, § 807(b)(2), substituted
‘‘subgrantee, or personal services contractor con-
cerned’’ for ‘‘or subgrantee concerned’’.
Subsec. (c)(1). Pub. L. 117–263, § 807(b)(3)(A)(i), sub-
stituted ‘‘subgrantee, or personal services contractor
concerned’’ for ‘‘or subgrantee concerned’’ in introduc-
tory provisions.
Subsec. (c)(1)(A). Pub. L. 117–263, § 807(b)(3)(A)(ii), sub-
stituted ‘‘subgrantee, or personal services contractor’’
for ‘‘or subgrantee’’.
Subsec. (c)(1)(B). Pub. L. 117–263, § 807(b)(3)(A)(iii),
substituted ‘‘subgrantee, or personal services con-
tractor’’ for ‘‘or subgrantee’’.
Subsec. (c)(1)(C). Pub. L. 117–263, § 807(b)(3)(A)(iv), sub-
stituted ‘‘subgrantee, or personal services contractor’’
for ‘‘or subgrantee’’.
Subsec. (c)(1)(D). Pub. L. 117–263, § 807(b)(3)(A)(v),
added subpar. (D).
Subsec. (c)(2). Pub. L. 117–263, § 807(b)(3)(B), sub-
stituted ‘‘subgrantee, or personal services contractor’’
for ‘‘or subgrantee’’.
Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 117–263, § 807(b)(4), substituted
‘‘subgrantees, and personal services contractors’’ for
‘‘and subgrantees’’.
Subsec. (f)(2). Pub. L. 117–263, § 807(b)(5), substituted
‘‘subgrantee, or personal services contractor’’ for ‘‘or
subgrantee’’ in two places.
Subsec. (g)(2). Pub. L. 117–286 substituted ‘‘chapter 4
of title 5’’ for ‘‘the Inspector General Act of 1978’’.
2020—Subsec. (a)(2)(G). Pub. L. 116–260, § 801(1), sub-
stituted ‘‘grantee, or subgrantee’’ for ‘‘or grantee’’.
Subsec. (a)(3)(A). Pub. L. 116–260, § 801(2), substituted
‘‘contractor, subcontractor, grantee, or subgrantee’’ for
‘‘contractor, subcontractor, or grantee’’.
Subsec. (b)(1). Pub. L. 116–260, § 801(3), substituted
‘‘contractor, subcontractor, grantee, or subgrantee’’ for
‘‘contractor or grantee’’.
Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 116–260, § 801(4), substituted ‘‘con-
tractor, subcontractor, grantee, or subgrantee’’ for
‘‘contractor or grantee’’ wherever appearing.
Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 116–260, § 801(5), substituted
‘‘grantees, and subgrantees’’ for ‘‘and grantees’’.
Subsec. (f). Pub. L. 116–260, § 801(6), substituted
‘‘grantee, or subgrantee’’ for ‘‘or grantee’’ in two
places.
2016—Pub. L. 114–261, § 1(a)(3)(A)(i), substituted ‘‘En-
hancement’’ for ‘‘Pilot program for enhancement’’ in
section catchline.
Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 114–261, § 1(a)(2), substituted
‘‘grantee, or subgrantee or personal services con-
tractor’’ for ‘‘or grantee’’.
Subsec. (i). Pub. L. 114–261, § 1(a)(3)(A)(ii), struck out
subsec. (i). Text read as follows: ‘‘This section shall be
in effect for the four-year period beginning on the date
of that is 180 days after the date the enactment of this
section.’’
2013—Subsec. (i). Pub. L. 113–66 inserted ‘‘that is 180
days after the date’’ before ‘‘the enactment’’.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 2013 AMENDMENT
Pub. L. 112–239, div. A, title VIII, § 828(b), Jan. 2, 2013,
126 Stat. 1840, provided that:
‘‘(1) IN
GENERAL.—The amendments made by sub-
section (a) [enacting this section] shall take effect on
the date that is 180 days after the date of the enact-
ment of this Act [Jan. 2, 2013], and shall, during the pe-
riod section 4712 of title 41, United States Code, as
added by such subsection, is in effect, apply to—
‘‘(A) all contracts and grants awarded on or after
such date;
‘‘(B) all task orders entered on or after such date
pursuant to contracts awarded before, on, or after
such date; and
‘‘(C) all contracts awarded before such date that are
modified to include a contract clause providing for
the applicability of such amendments.
‘‘(2) REVISION OF FEDERAL ACQUISITION REGULATION.—
Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment
of this Act, the Federal Acquisition Regulation shall be
revised to implement the requirements arising under
the amendments made by this section [enacting this
section and amending sections 4310 and 4705 of this
title].
‘‘(3) INCLUSION
OF
CONTRACT
CLAUSE
IN
CONTRACTS
AWARDED BEFORE EFFECTIVE DATE.—At the time of any
major modification to a contract that was awarded be-
fore the date that is 180 days after the date of the en-
actment of this Act [Jan. 2, 2013], the head of the con-
tracting agency shall make best efforts to include in
the contract a contract clause providing for the appli-
cability of the amendments made by this section to the
contract.’’
§ 4713. Authorities relating to mitigating supply
chain risks in the procurement of covered ar-
ticles
(a) AUTHORITY.—Subject to subsection (b), the
head of an executive agency may carry out a
covered procurement action.
(b) DETERMINATION AND NOTIFICATION.—Except
as authorized by subsection (c) to address an ur-
gent national security interest, the head of an
executive agency may exercise the authority
provided in subsection (a) only after—
(1) obtaining a joint recommendation, in un-
classified or classified form, from the chief ac-
quisition officer and the chief information of-
ficer of the agency, or officials performing
similar functions in the case of executive
agencies that do not have such officials, which
includes a review of any risk assessment made
available by the executive agency identified
under section 1323(a)(3) of this title, that there
is a significant supply chain risk in a covered
procurement;
(2)
providing
notice
of
the
joint
rec-
ommendation described in paragraph (1) to
any source named in the joint recommenda-
tion advising—
(A) that a recommendation is being con-
sidered or has been obtained;
(B) to the extent consistent with the na-
tional security and law enforcement inter-
ests, of information that forms the basis for
the recommendation;
(C) that, within 30 days after receipt of the
notice, the source may submit information
and argument in opposition to the rec-
ommendation; and
(D) of the procedures governing the consid-
eration of the submission and the possible
exercise of the authority provided in sub-
section (a);
(3) making a determination in writing, in
unclassified or classified form, after consid-
ering any information submitted by a source
under paragraph (2) and in consultation with
the chief information security officer of the
agency, that—
(A) use of the authority under subsection
(a) is necessary to protect national security
by reducing supply chain risk;
(B) less intrusive measures are not reason-
ably available to reduce such supply chain
risk; and
(C) the use of such authorities will apply
to a single covered procurement or a class of
covered procurements, and otherwise speci-
fies the scope of the determination; and
(4) providing a classified or unclassified no-
tice of the determination made under para-
Cross-references
Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
### Statutory Notes
Section, act Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 127; Pub. L. 85–568, title III, § 301(b), July 29, 1958, 72 Stat. 432; Pub. L. 85–861, § 1(43A), Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1457; Pub. L. 96–513, title V, § 511(74), Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 2926; Pub. L. 98–369, div. B, title VII, § 2722(a), July 18, 1984, 98 Stat. 1186; Pub. L. 98–525, title XII, § 1211, Oct. 19, 1984, 98 Stat. 2589; Pub. L. 98–577, title V, § 504(b)(3), Oct. 30, 1984, 98 Stat. 3087; Pub. L. 99–661, div. A, title XIII, § 1343(a)(13), Nov. 14, 1986, 100 Stat. 3993; Pub. L. 100–26, § 7(k)(2), Apr. 21, 1987, 101 Stat. 284; Pub. L. 101–189, div. A, title VIII, § 853(b)(1), Nov. 29, 1989, 103 Stat. 1518; Pub. L. 102–25, title VII, § 701(d)(1), Apr. 6, 1991, 105 Stat. 113; Pub. L. 102–190, div. A, title VIII, § 805, Dec. 5, 1991, 105 Stat. 1417; Pub. L. 103–355, title I, § 1502, Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 3296; Pub. L. 104–106, div. D, title XLIII, § 4321(b)(3), Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 672; Pub. L. 104–201, div. A, title VIII, §§ 805(a)(1), 807(a), Sept. 23, 1996, 110 Stat. 2605, 2606; Pub. L. 105–85, div. A, title VIII, § 803(b), Nov. 18, 1997, 111 Stat. 1832; Pub. L. 107–217, § 3(b)(2), Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1295; Pub. L. 107–296, title XVII, § 1704(b)(1), Nov. 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 2314; Pub. L. 111–350, § 5(b)(8), Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 3842; Pub. L. 111–383, div. A, title VIII, § 866(g)(1), Jan. 7, 2011, 124 Stat. 4298; Pub. L. 113–291, div. A, title X, § 1071(a)(2), Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3504; Pub. L. 114–92, div. A, title VIII, § 815(b), Nov. 25, 2015, 129 Stat. 896; Pub. L. 115–91, div. A, title II, § 221, Dec. 12, 2017, 131 Stat. 1333; Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, § 836(c)(1), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1864; Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title XVIII, § 1806(a)(5), (6), (b)(2)–(6
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 10 U.S.C. § 2302
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. The source passage cites 10 U.S.C. § 2302. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 1869
TITLE 10—ARMED FORCES
[§ 2302d
extreme weather to ensure the ongoing avail-
ability of such lands to military personnel,
weapon systems, and equipment for testing
and training purposes.
(2) TRAINING AND EDUCATION ON SUSTAINMENT
OF LANDS.—The Secretary shall develop a pro-
gram of training and education for members of
the Armed Forces (including the reserve com-
ponents)
on
the
importance
of
the
sustainment of the lands of the military test-
ing and training ranges as described in para-
graph (1).
(3) INVESTMENT IN RESILIENCE OF LANDS.—The
Secretary shall use existing programs of the
Department, including the Readiness and En-
vironmental Protection Integration Program
of the Department (or such successor pro-
gram), to provide for investments determined
appropriate by the Secretary in the lands of
the military testing and training ranges, to in-
crease the resilience and adaptation of such
lands to the current and projected impacts of
extreme weather for testing and training pur-
poses in connection with current and projected
testing and training requirements in the
short- and long-term.
(f) USE OF CERTAIN TECHNOLOGIES.—The Sec-
retary shall take appropriate actions to increase
the use of low emission, emission-free, and net-
zero-emission energy technologies in the oper-
ations, programs, projects, and activities of the
Department, provided the use is cost effective
over the life-cycle of the investment.
(Added Pub. L. 117–81, div. A, title III, § 332(a),
Dec. 27, 2021, 135 Stat. 1637; amended Pub. L.
118–159, div. A, title XVII, § 1701(a)(28), Dec. 23,
2024, 138 Stat. 2204.)
Editorial Notes
AMENDMENTS
2024—Subsecs. (b) to (f). Pub. L. 118–159 redesignated
subsecs. (d) to (f) as (c) to (e), respectively, and the sec-
ond subsec
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 10 U.S.C. § 2302
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. The source passage cites 10 U.S.C. § 2302. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
### Statutory Notes
Section, added Pub. L. 99–145, title IX, § 911(a)(1), Nov. 8, 1985, 99 Stat. 682; amended Pub. L. 99–190, § 101(b) [title VIII, § 8112(a)], Dec. 19, 1985, 99 Stat. 1185, 1223; Pub. L. 100–26, § 7(k)(3), Apr. 21, 1987, 101 Stat. 284; Pub. L. 100–180, div. A, title VIII, § 805(a), Dec. 4, 1987, 101 Stat. 1126; Pub. L. 100–370, § 1(f)(2)(A), (3)(A), July 19, 1988, 102 Stat. 846; Pub. L. 100–456, div. A, title III, § 322(a), title VIII, §§ 826(a), 832(a), Sept. 29, 1988, 102 Stat. 1952, 2022, 2023; Pub. L. 100–463, title VIII, § 8105(a), Oct. 1, 1988, 102 Stat. 2270–36; Pub. L. 100–526, title I, § 106(a)(2), Oct. 24, 1988, 102 Stat. 2625; Pub. L. 100–700, § 8(b), Nov. 19, 1988, 102 Stat. 4636; Pub. L. 101–189, div. A, title III, § 311(a)(1), title VIII, § 853(a)(1), (b)(3), Nov. 29, 1989, 103 Stat. 1411, 1518; Pub. L. 101–510, div. A, title XIII, § 1301(10), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1668; Pub. L. 102–190, div. A, title III, § 346(a), Dec. 5, 1991, 105 Stat. 1346; Pub. L. 102–484, div. A, title VIII, § 818(a), title X, § 1052(26), title XIII, § 1352(b), Oct. 23, 1992, 106 Stat. 2457, 2500, 2559; Pub. L. 103–355, title II, § 2101(a)–(d), Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 3306–3308; Pub. L. 104–106, div. D, title XLIII, § 4321(a)(5), (b)(9), Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 671, 672; Pub. L. 105–85, div. A, title VIII, § 808(a), Nov. 18, 1997, 111 Stat. 1836; Pub. L. 105–261, div. A, title VIII, § 804(a), Oct. 17, 1998, 112 Stat. 2083; Pub. L. 111–350, § 5(b)(19), Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 3844; Pub. L. 112–81, div. A, title VIII, § 803(a), (b), Dec. 31, 2011, 125 Stat. 1485; Pub. L. 112–239, div. A, title VIII, § 827(g), Jan. 2, 2013, 126 Stat. 1836; Pub. L. 113–66, div. A, title VIII, § 811(a), Dec. 26, 2013, 127 Stat. 806; Pub. L. 113–67, div. A, title VII, § 702(a)(2), De
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 10 U.S.C. § 2324
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. The source passage cites 10 U.S.C. § 2324. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 1873
TITLE 10—ARMED FORCES
[§ 2324
Section 2321, added Pub. L. 98–525, title XII, § 1216(a),
Oct. 19, 1984, 98 Stat. 2597; amended Pub. L. 99–500
§ 101(c) [title X, § 953(b)], Oct. 18, 1986, 100 Stat. 1783–82,
1783–171, and Pub. L. 99–591, § 101(c) [title X, § 953(b)],
Oct. 30, 1986, 100 Stat. 3341–82, 3341–171; Pub. L. 99–661,
div. A, title IX, formerly title IV, § 953(b), Nov. 14, 1986,
100 Stat. 3951, renumbered title IX, Pub. L. 100–26, § 3(5),
Apr. 21, 1987, 101 Stat. 273, Pub. L. 100–26, § 7(a)(5), Apr.
21, 1987, 101 Stat. 276; Pub. L. 100–180, div. A, title XII,
§ 1231(6), Dec. 4, 1987, 101 Stat. 1160; Pub. L. 103–35, title
II, § 201(g)(4), May 31, 1993, 107 Stat. 100; Pub. L. 103–355,
title VIII, § 8106(b), Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 3393; Pub. L.
109–364, div. A, title VIII, § 802(b), Oct. 17, 2006, 120 Stat.
2313; Pub. L. 110–181, div. A, title VIII, § 815(a)(2), Jan.
28, 2008, 122 Stat. 223; Pub. L. 111–350, § 5(b)(18), Jan. 4,
2011, 124 Stat. 3844; Pub. L. 111–383, div. A, title VIII,
§ 824(c), Jan. 7, 2011, 124 Stat. 4269; Pub. L. 112–81, div. A,
title VIII, § 815(b), Dec. 31, 2011, 125 Stat. 1492; Pub. L.
113–291, div. A, title X, § 1071(a)(5), Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat.
3504; Pub. L. 114–92, div. A, title VIII, § 813(a), Nov. 25,
2015, 129 Stat. 891; Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII,
§§ 836(c)(8), 865, 866(a), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1866, 1901;
Pub. L. 116–92, div. A, title VIII, § 808(b), Dec. 20, 2019,
133 Stat. 1486; Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title X,
§ 1081(d)(4)(B)(ii), title XVIII, § 1833(h)(1), (i)(1), (j)(1),
(k), (l)(1), (m), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 3874, 4231–4233; Pub.
L. 117–81, div. A, title X, § 1081(a)(28), Dec. 27, 2021, 135
Stat. 1921, related to validation of proprietary data re-
strictions. See, generally
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 10 U.S.C. § 2324
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. The source passage cites 10 U.S.C. § 2324. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a) Prohibition of Reprisals.—**
(1) **In general.—** — An employee of a contractor, subcontractor, grantee, subgrantee, or personal services contractor may not be discharged, demoted, or otherwise discriminated against as a reprisal for disclosing to a person or body described in paragraph (2) information that the employee reasonably believes is evidence of gross mismanagement of a Federal contract or grant, a gross waste of Federal funds, an abuse of authority relating to a Federal contract or grant, a substantial and specific danger to public health or safety, or a violation of law, rule, or regulation related to a Federal contract (including the competition for or negotiation of a contract) or grant.
(2) **Persons and bodies covered.—** — The persons and bodies described in this paragraph are the persons and bodies as follows:
(A) A Member of Congress or a representative of a committee of Congress.
(B) An Inspector General.
(C) The Government Accountability Office.
(D) A Federal employee responsible for contract or grant oversight or management at the relevant agency.
(E) An authorized official of the Department of Justice or other law enforcement agency.
(F) A court or grand jury.
(G) A management official or other employee of the contractor, subcontractor, grantee, subgrantee, or personal services contractor who has the responsibility to investigate, discover, or address misconduct.
(3) **Rules of construction.—** — For the purposes of paragraph (1)—
(A) an employee who initiates or provides evidence of contractor, subcontractor, grantee, subgrantee, or personal services contractor misconduct in any judicial or administrative proceeding relating to waste, fraud, or abuse on a Federal contract or grant shall be deemed to have made a dis
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 41 U.S.C. § 4712
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
### Statutory Notes
#### Codification
Section 442b, comprising section 1103 of the National Security Act of 1947, act July 26, 1947, ch. 343, was editorially reclassified as [section 3233 of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title50-section3233&num=0&edition=prelim).
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 50 U.S.C. § 401a
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. The source passage cites 50 U.S.C. § 401a. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 69
TITLE 50—WAR AND NATIONAL DEFENSE
§ 401a
26, 1947, ch. 343, title II, § 205(a), 61 Stat. 501, related to
distribution of information.
A prior section 331, act Sept. 16, 1942, ch. 561, title III,
§ 301, as added Apr. 1, 1944, ch. 150, 58 Stat. 140, related
to establishment of United States War Ballot Commis-
sion and was repealed by act Apr. 19, 1946, ch. 142, 60
Stat. 96.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
ADDITIONAL REPEAL
Sections 321 to 331 were also repealed by act Aug. 10,
1956, ch. 1041, § 53, 70A Stat. 641.
§§ 332 to 340. Repealed. Apr. 19, 1946, ch. 142, 60
Stat. 96
Section 332, act Sept. 16, 1942, ch. 561, title III, § 302,
as added Apr. 1, 1944, ch. 150, 58 Stat. 140, related to per-
sons subject to this subchapter.
Section 333, act Sept. 16, 1942, ch. 561, title III, § 303,
as added Apr. 1, 1944, ch. 150, 58 Stat. 141, related to
Federal war ballots.
Section 334, act Sept. 16, 1942, ch. 561, title III, § 304,
as added Apr. 1, 1944, ch. 150, 58 Stat. 143, related to ad-
ministration of oaths.
Section 335, act Sept. 16, 1942, ch. 561, title III, § 305,
as added Apr. 1, 1944, ch. 150, 58 Stat. 143, related to ad-
ministration of this subchapter.
Section 336, act Sept. 16, 1942, ch. 561, title III, § 306,
as added Apr. 1, 1944, ch. 150, 58 Stat. 144, related to
lists of candidates.
Section 337, act Sept. 16, 1942, ch. 561, title III, § 307,
as added Apr. 1, 1944, ch. 150, 58 Stat. 144, related to dis-
tribution and collection of ballots.
Section 338, act Sept. 16, 1942, ch. 561, title III, § 308,
as added Apr. 1, 1944, ch. 150, 58 Stat. 145, related to
merchant marine ballots.
Section 339, act Sept. 16, 1942, ch. 561, title III, § 309,
as added Apr. 1, 1944, ch. 150, 58 Stat. 145, related to
transmission of ballots.
Se
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 50 U.S.C. § 401a
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. The source passage cites 50 U.S.C. § 401a. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.