35 U.S.C. § 145 — Civil action to obtain patent

Page 67 TITLE 35—PATENTS § 145 Editorial Notes AMENDMENTS 2002—Pub. L. 107–273 made technical correction to di- rectory language of Pub. L. 106–113. See 1999 Amend- ment note below. 1999—Pub. L. 106–113, as amended by Pub. L. 107–273, substituted ‘‘Director’’ for ‘‘Commissioner’’. 1984—Pub. L. 98–620 substituted provisions requiring the court to review the decision on the record before the Patent and Trademark Office and upon reaching a determination to issue its mandate and opinion to the Commissioner for provisions which required the court, on petition, to hear and determine the appeal on the evidence produced before the Patent and Trademark Office (with the decision to be confined to the points set forth in the reasons of appeal) and, upon its deter- mination, to return to the Commissioner a certificate of its proceedings and decision. 1982—Pub. L. 97–164 substituted ‘‘Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit’’ for ‘‘Court of Customs and Patent Appeals’’. 1975—Pub. L. 93–596 substituted ‘‘Patent and Trade- mark Office’’ for ‘‘Patent Office’’ in two places. Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1999 AMENDMENT Amendment by Pub. L. 106–113 effective 4 months after Nov. 29, 1999, see section 1000(a)(9) [title IV, § 4731] of Pub. L. 106–113, set out as a note under section 1 of this title. EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1984 AMENDMENT Amendment by Pub. L. 98–620 applicable to pro- ceedings pending in the Patent and Trademark Office on Nov. 8, 1984, and to appeals pending in the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit on such date, see section 414(c) of Pub. L. 98–620, set out as a note under section 142 of this title. EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1982 AMENDMENT Amendment by Pub. L. 97–164 effective Oct. 1, 1982, see section 402 of Pub. L. 97–164, set out as a note under section 171 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Proce- dure. EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1975 AMENDMENT Amendment by Pub. L. 93–596 effective Jan. 2, 1975, see section 4 of Pub. L. 93–596, set out as a note under section 1111 of Title 15, Commerce and Trade. § 145. Civil action to obtain patent An applicant dissatisfied with the decision of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board in an appeal under section 134(a) may, unless appeal has been taken to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, have remedy by civil action against the Director in the United States Dis- trict Court for the Eastern District of Virginia if commenced within such time after such deci- sion, not less than sixty days, as the Director appoints. The court may adjudge that such ap- plicant is entitled to receive a patent for his in- vention, as specified in any of his claims in- volved in the decision of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, as the facts in the case may ap- pear and such adjudication shall authorize the Director to issue such patent on compliance with the requirements of law. All the expenses of the proceedings shall be paid by the appli- cant. (July 19, 1952, ch. 950, 66 Stat. 803; Pub. L. 97–164, title I, § 163(a)(7), Apr. 2, 1982, 96 Stat. 49; Pub. L. 98–622, title II, § 203(b), Nov. 8, 1984, 98 Stat. 3387; Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, § 1000(a)(9) [title IV, §§ 4605(e), 4732(a)(10)(A)], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1536, 1501A–571, 1501A–582; Pub. L. 107–273, div. C, title III, § 13206(b)(1)(B), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1906; Pub. L. 112–29, §§ 3(j)(1), 9(a), 20(j), Sept. 16, 2011, 125 Stat. 290, 316, 335.) HISTORICAL AND REVISION NOTES Based on Title 35, U.S.C., 1946 ed., § 63 (R.S. 4915, amended (1) Mar. 2, 1927, ch. 273, § 11, 44 Stat. 1336, (2) Mar. 2, 1929, ch. 488, § 2(b), 45 Stat. 1476, (3) Aug. 5, 1939, ch. 451, § 4, 53 Stat. 1212). Bill in equity is changed to civil action and the sec- tion is restricted to exclude interferences which are covered by the next section. The time for filing the ac- tion is changed to the same as the time for appeal. The requirement for the applicant to file a copy of the deci- sion in the Patent Office is omitted. Language is changed. Editorial Notes AMENDMENTS 2011—Pub. L. 112–29, § 20(j), struck out ‘‘of this title’’ after ‘‘134(a)’’. Pub. L. 112–29, § 9(a), substituted ‘‘United States Dis- trict Court for the Eastern District of Virginia’’ for ‘‘United States District Court for the District of Co- lumbia’’. Pub. L. 112–29, § 3(j)(1), substituted ‘‘Patent Trial and Appeal Board’’ for ‘‘Board of Patent Appeals and Inter- ferences’’ in two places. 2002—Pub. L. 107–273 made technical correction to di- rectory language of Pub. L. 106–113, § 1000(a)(9) [title IV, § 4732(a)(10)(A)]. See 1999 Amendment note below. 1999—Pub. L. 106–113, § 1000(a)(9) [title IV, § 4732(a)(10)(A)], as amended by Pub. L. 107–273, sub- stituted ‘‘Director’’ for ‘‘Commissioner’’ wherever ap- pearing. Pub. L. 106–113, § 1000(a)(9) [title IV, § 4605(e)], inserted ‘‘(a)’’ after ‘‘section 134’’. 1984—Pub. L. 98–622 substituted ‘‘Patent Appeals and Interferences in an appeal under section 134 of this title may,’’ for ‘‘Appeals may’’ in first sentence and ‘‘Patent Appeals and Interferences’’ for ‘‘Appeals’’ in second sentence. 1982—Pub. L. 97–164 substituted ‘‘Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit’’ for ‘‘Court of Customs and Patent Appeals’’. Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries EFFECTIVE DATE OF 2011 AMENDMENT Amendment by section 3(j)(1) of Pub. L. 112–29 effec- tive upon the expiration of the 18-month period begin- ning on Sept. 16, 2011, and applicable to certain applica- tions for patent and any patents issuing thereon, see section 3(n) of Pub. L. 112–29, set out as an Effective Date of 2011 Amendment; Savings Provisions note under section 100 of this title. Amendment by section 9(a) of Pub. L. 112–29 effective Sept. 16, 2011, and applicable to any civil action com- menced on or after that date, see section 9(b) of Pub. L. 112–29, set out as a note under section 1071 of Title 15, Commerce and Trade. Amendment by section 20(j) of Pub. L. 112–29 effective upon the expiration of the 1-year period beginning on Sept. 16, 2011, and applicable to proceedings commenced on or after that effective date, see section 20(l) of Pub. L. 112–29, set out as a note under section 2 of this title. EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1999 AMENDMENT Amendment by section 1000(a)(9) [title IV, § 4605(e)] of Pub. L. 106–113 applicable to any reexamination filed in the United States Patent and Trademark Office on or after Nov. 2, 2002, see section 13202(d) of Pub. L. 107–273, set out as a note under section 134 of this title. Amendment by section 1000(a)(9) [title IV, § 4605(e)] of Pub. L. 106–113 effective Nov. 29, 1999, and applicable to Page 68 TITLE 35—PATENTS § 146 any patent issuing from an original application filed in the United States on or after that date, see section 1000(a)(9) [title IV, § 4608(a)] of Pub. L. 106–113, set out as a note under section 41 of this title. Amendment by section 1000(a)(9) [title IV, § 4732(a)(10)(A)] of Pub. L. 106–113 effective 4 months after Nov. 29, 1999, see section 1000(a)(9) [title IV, § 4731] of Pub. L. 106–113, set out as a note under section 1 of this title. EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1984 AMENDMENT Amendment by Pub. L. 98–622 effective three months after Nov. 8, 1984, see section 207 of Pub. L. 98–622, set out as a note under section 41 of this title. EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1982 AMENDMENT Amendment by Pub. L. 97–164 effective Oct. 1, 1982, see section 402 of Pub. L. 97–164, set out as a note under section 171 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Proce- dure. § 146. Civil action in case of derivation pro- ceeding Any party to a derivation proceeding dissatis- fied with the decision of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board on the derivation proceeding, may have remedy by civil action, if commenced with- in such time after such decision, not less than sixty days, as the Director appoints or as pro- vided in section 141, unless he has appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fed- eral Circuit, and such appeal is pending or has been decided. In such suits the record in the Patent and Trademark Office shall be admitted on motion of either party upon the terms and conditions as to costs, expenses, and the further cross-examination of the witnesses as the court imposes, without prejudice to the right of the parties to take further testimony. The testi- mony and exhibits of the record in the Patent and Trademark Office when admitted shall have the same effect as if originally taken and pro- duced in the suit. Such suit may be instituted against the party in interest as shown by the records of the Patent and Trademark Office at the time of the deci- sion complained of, but any party in interest may become a party to the action. If there be adverse parties residing in a plurality of dis- tricts not embraced within the same state, or an adverse party residing in a foreign country, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia shall have jurisdiction and may issue summons against the adverse parties directed to the marshal of any district in which any adverse party resides. Summons against ad- verse parties residing in foreign countries may be served by publication or otherwise as the court directs. The Director shall not be a nec- essary party but he shall be notified of the filing of the suit by the clerk of the court in which it is filed and shall have the right to intervene. Judgment of the court in favor of the right of an applicant to a patent shall authorize the Direc- tor to issue such patent on the filing in the Pat- ent and Trademark Office of a certified copy of the judgment and on compliance with the re- quirements of law. (July 19, 1952, ch. 950, 66 Stat. 803; Pub. L. 93–596, § 1, Jan. 2, 1975, 88 Stat. 1949; Pub. L. 97–164, title I, § 163(a)(7), Apr. 2, 1982, 96 Stat. 49; Pub. L. 98–622, title II, § 203(c), Nov. 8, 1984, 98 Stat. 3387; Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, § 1000(a)(9) [title IV, § 4732(a)(10)(A)], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1536, 1501A–582; Pub. L. 107–273, div. C, title III, § 13206(b)(1)(B), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1906; Pub. L. 112–29, §§ 3(j)(1), (2)(A), (4), 9(a), 20(j), Sept. 16, 2011, 125 Stat. 290, 316, 335.) HISTORICAL AND REVISION NOTES The first paragraph and parts of the second paragraph are based on Title 35, U.S.C., 1946 ed., § 63 (R.S. 4915, amended (1) Mar. 2, 1927, ch. 273, § 11, 44 Stat. 1336, (2) Mar. 2, 1929, ch. 488, § 2(b), 45 Stat. 1476, (3) Aug. 5, 1939, ch. 451, § 4, 53 Stat. 1212), limited to interferences and making some changes. The action is not restricted to applicants, but a patentee may also bring the action. The time for bringing the action is made the same as for appeals. In the second paragraph the first sentence is new and eliminates difficulties arising from unrecorded inter- ests. The second sentence is based on Title 35, U.S.C., 1946 ed., § 72a (Mar. 3, 1927, ch. 364, 44 Stat. 1394, reenacted Oct. 31, 1951, ch. 655, § 53a, 65 Stat. 728) with changes in language. The fourth sentence is new and prevents such suits from being filed against the Commissioner as a defend- ant; however, the Commissioner has the right to inter- vene. Language is changed. Editorial Notes AMENDMENTS 2011—Pub. L. 112–29, § 20(j), struck out ‘‘of this title’’ after ‘‘141’’. Pub. L. 112–29, § 9(a), substituted ‘‘United States Dis- trict Court for the Eastern District of Virginia’’ for ‘‘United States District Court for the District of Co- lumbia’’. Pub. L. 112–29, § 3(j)(1), (2)(A), (4), amended section catchline generally, substituting ‘‘Civil action in case of derivation proceeding’’ for ‘‘Civil action in case of interference’’, and substituted in text ‘‘a derivation proceeding’’ for ‘‘an interference’’, ‘‘Patent Trial and Appeal Board’’ for ‘‘Board of Patent Appeals and Inter- ferences’’, and ‘‘the derivation proceeding’’ for ‘‘the in- terference’’. 2002—Pub. L. 107–273 made technical correction to di- rectory language of Pub. L. 106–113. See 1999 Amend- ment note below. 1999—Pub. L. 106–113, as amended by Pub. L. 107–273, substituted ‘‘Director’’ for ‘‘Commissioner’’ wherever appearing. 1984—Pub. L. 98–622 substituted ‘‘Board of Patent Ap- peals and Interferences on the interference’’ for ‘‘board of patent interference on the question of priority’’. 1982—Pub. L. 97–164 substituted ‘‘Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit’’ for ‘‘Court of Customs and Patent Appeals’’. 1975—Pub. L. 93–596 substituted ‘‘Patent and Trade- mark Office’’ for ‘‘Patent Office’’ wherever appearing. Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries EFFECTIVE DATE OF 2011 AMENDMENT Amendment by section 3(j)(1), (2)(A), (4) of Pub. L. 112–29 effective upon the expiration of the 18-month pe- riod beginning on Sept. 16, 2011, and applicable to cer- tain applications for patent and any patents issuing thereon, see section 3(n) of Pub. L. 112–29, set out as an Effective Date of 2011 Amendment; Savings Provisions note under section 100 of this title. Amendment by section 9(a) of Pub. L. 112–29 effective Sept. 16, 2011, and applicable to any civil action com- menced on or after that date, see section 9(b) of Pub. L. 112–29, set out as a note under section 1071 of Title 15, Commerce and Trade. Amendment by section 20(j) of Pub. L. 112–29 effective upon the expiration of the 1-year period beginning on