Browse Arkansas Code titles and sections
10 U.S.C. § 4211 — Acquisition strategy
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 2708
TITLE 10—ARMED FORCES
§ 4211
VIII, § 834, Dec. 31, 2011, 125 Stat. 1506, directed the Sec-
retary of Defense to issue, not later than 180 days after
Jan. 7, 2011, comprehensive guidance on the manage-
ment of manufacturing risk in major defense acquisi-
tion programs and to ensure that the acquisition work-
force chapter of the annual strategic workforce plan re-
quired by former section 115b of this title included an
assessment of the critical manufacturing readiness
knowledge and skills needed in the acquisition work-
force and a plan of action for addressing any gaps in
such knowledge and skills.
CONGRESSIONAL NOTIFICATION OF CANCELLATION OF
MAJOR AUTOMATED INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Pub. L. 109–163, div. A, title VIII, § 806, Jan. 6, 2006, 119
Stat. 3373, which required notification to the Commit-
tees on Armed Services and Appropriations of the Sen-
ate and the House of Representatives prior to cancella-
tion of a major automated information system program
that had been fielded or approved to be fielded or mak-
ing a change that would significantly reduce the scope
of such a program, was repealed by Pub. L. 118–159, div.
A, title XVII, § 1701(g), Dec. 23, 2024, 138 Stat. 2207.
§ 4211. Acquisition strategy
(a) ACQUISITION
STRATEGY
REQUIRED.—There
shall be an acquisition strategy for each major
defense acquisition program and each major sys-
tem approved by a milestone decision authority.
(b) RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL.—For each acquisi-
tion strategy required by subsection (a), the
Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and
Sustainment, or the milestone decision author-
ity, when the milestone decision authority is
the service acquisition executive of the military
department that is managing the program, is re-
sponsible for issuing and maintain
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 10 U.S.C. § 4211
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.
Original supplied file — preserved unchanged
Download original Markdown file
File SHA-256: e05f4065283ea956d9befdf78584cef6ea5f26adf44cd401f095c420011b4770. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.
Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.
Open the recorded source website ↗
Record provenance
Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:usc2024-223cbae4e69c46b62957d719
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code-2024/title-10/section-4211-acquisition-strategy--f4b1e49269.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: 56870a22f4b4d522c2f071955050035bbfceea45db86b0b82a30e2460830edf3
Source location: USCODE-2024-title10-subtitleA-partV-subpartF-chap322-subchapI-sec4211.pdf
Stored source content
Page 2708
TITLE 10—ARMED FORCES
§ 4211
VIII, § 834, Dec. 31, 2011, 125 Stat. 1506, directed the Sec-
retary of Defense to issue, not later than 180 days after
Jan. 7, 2011, comprehensive guidance on the manage-
ment of manufacturing risk in major defense acquisi-
tion programs and to ensure that the acquisition work-
force chapter of the annual strategic workforce plan re-
quired by former section 115b of this title included an
assessment of the critical manufacturing readiness
knowledge and skills needed in the acquisition work-
force and a plan of action for addressing any gaps in
such knowledge and skills.
CONGRESSIONAL NOTIFICATION OF CANCELLATION OF
MAJOR AUTOMATED INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Pub. L. 109–163, div. A, title VIII, § 806, Jan. 6, 2006, 119
Stat. 3373, which required notification to the Commit-
tees on Armed Services and Appropriations of the Sen-
ate and the House of Representatives prior to cancella-
tion of a major automated information system program
that had been fielded or approved to be fielded or mak-
ing a change that would significantly reduce the scope
of such a program, was repealed by Pub. L. 118–159, div.
A, title XVII, § 1701(g), Dec. 23, 2024, 138 Stat. 2207.
§ 4211. Acquisition strategy
(a) ACQUISITION
STRATEGY
REQUIRED.—There
shall be an acquisition strategy for each major
defense acquisition program and each major sys-
tem approved by a milestone decision authority.
(b) RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL.—For each acquisi-
tion strategy required by subsection (a), the
Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and
Sustainment, or the milestone decision author-
ity, when the milestone decision authority is
the service acquisition executive of the military
department that is managing the program, is re-
sponsible for issuing and maintaining the re-
quirements for—
(1) the content of the strategy; and
(2) the review and approval process for the
strategy.
(c) CONSIDERATIONS.—(1) In issuing require-
ments for the content of an acquisition strategy
for a major defense acquisition program or
major system, the Under Secretary, or the mile-
stone decision authority, when the milestone de-
cision authority is the service acquisition execu-
tive of the military department that is man-
aging the program, shall ensure that—
(A) the strategy clearly describes the pro-
posed top-level business and technical man-
agement approach for the program or system,
in sufficient detail to allow the milestone de-
cision authority to assess the viability of the
proposed approach, the method of imple-
menting laws and policies, and program objec-
tives;
(B) the strategy contains a clear explanation
of how the strategy is designed to be imple-
mented with available resources, such as time,
funding, and management capacity;
(C) the strategy is tailored to address pro-
gram requirements and constraints; and
(D) the strategy considers the items listed in
paragraph (2).
(2) Each strategy shall, where appropriate,
consider the following:
(A) An approach that delivers required capa-
bility in increments, each depending on avail-
able mature technology, and that recognizes
up front the need for future capability im-
provements.
(B) Acquisition approach, including indus-
trial base considerations in accordance with
section 4820 of this title.
(C) Risk management, including such meth-
ods as competitive prototyping at the system,
subsystem, or component level.
(D) Business strategy, including measures to
ensure competition at the system and sub-
system level throughout the life-cycle of the
program or system in accordance with section
4324 of this title.
(E) Contracting strategy, including—
(i) contract type and how the type selected
relates to level of program risk in each ac-
quisition phase;
(ii) how the plans for the program or sys-
tem to reduce risk enable the use of fixed-
price elements in subsequent contracts and
the timing of the use of those fixed price ele-
ments;
(iii) market research; and
(iv) consideration of small business par-
ticipation.
(F) Intellectual property strategy in accord-
ance with sections 3771 through 3775 of this
title.
(G) International involvement, including
foreign military sales and cooperative oppor-
tunities, in accordance with section 2350a of
this title.
(H) Multiyear procurement in accordance
with section 3501 of this title.
(I) Integration of current intelligence assess-
ments into the acquisition process.
(J) Requirements related to logistics, main-
tenance, and sustainment in accordance with
sections 2464 and 2466 of this title.
(d) REVIEW.—(1) The milestone decision au-
thority shall review and approve, as appropriate,
the acquisition strategy for a major defense ac-
quisition program or major system at each of
the following times:
(A) Milestone A approval.
(B) The decision to release the request for
proposals for development of the program or
system.
(C) Milestone B approval.
(D) Each subsequent milestone.
(E) Review of any decision to enter into full-
rate production.
(F) When there has been—
(i) a significant change to the cost of the
program or system;
(ii) a critical change to the cost of the pro-
gram or system;
(iii) a significant change to the schedule of
the program or system; or
(iv) a significant change to the perform-
ance of the program or system.
(G) Any other time considered relevant by
the milestone decision authority.
(2) If the milestone decision authority revises
an acquisition strategy for a program or system
because of a change described in paragraph
(1)(F), the milestone decision authority shall
provide notice of the revision to the congres-
sional defense committees.
(e) DEFINITIONS.—In this section:
(1) The term ‘‘Milestone A approval’’ means
a decision to enter into technology matura-
Page 2709
TITLE 10—ARMED FORCES
§ 4212
tion and risk reduction pursuant to guidance
prescribed by the Secretary of Defense for the
management of Department of Defense acqui-
sition programs.
(2) The term ‘‘Milestone B approval’’ has the
meaning provided in section 4172(e)(7) of this
title.
(3) The term ‘‘milestone decision authority’’,
with respect to a major defense acquisition
program or major system, means the official
within the Department of Defense designated
with the overall responsibility and authority
for acquisition decisions for the program or
system, including authority to approve entry
of the program or system into the next phase
of the acquisition process.
(4) The term ‘‘management capacity’’, with
respect to a major defense acquisition pro-
gram or major system, means the capacity to
manage the program or system through the
use of highly qualified organizations and per-
sonnel with appropriate experience, knowl-
edge, and skills.
(5) The term ‘‘significant change to the
cost’’, with respect to a major defense acquisi-
tion program or major system, means a sig-
nificant cost growth threshold, as that term is
defined in section 4371(a)(2) of this title.
(6) The term ‘‘critical change to the cost’’,
with respect to a major defense acquisition
program or major system, means a critical
cost growth threshold, as that term is defined
in section 4371(a)(3) of this title.
(7) The term ‘‘significant change to the
schedule’’, with respect to a major defense ac-
quisition program or major system, means any
schedule delay greater than six months in a
reported event.
(Added Pub. L. 114–92, div. A, title VIII,
§ 821(a)(1), Nov. 25, 2015, 129 Stat. 897, § 2431a;
amended Pub. L. 114–328, div. A, title VIII, § 848,
Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2292; Pub. L. 115–91, div. A,
title X, § 1081(a)(39), Dec. 12, 2017, 131 Stat. 1596;
Pub. L. 116–92, div. A, title IX, § 902(70), Dec. 20,
2019, 133 Stat. 1551; renumbered § 4211 and amend-
ed Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title XVIII, § 1847(b)(1),
(2), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4253; Pub. L. 117–81, div.
A, title XVII, § 1701(s)(1), Dec. 27, 2021, 135 Stat.
2149; Pub. L. 118–159, div. A, title XVII,
§ 1701(a)(39), Dec. 23, 2024, 138 Stat. 2205.)
Editorial Notes
AMENDMENTS
2024—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 118–159, § 1701(a)(39)(B),
struck out ‘‘, each major automated information sys-
tem,’’ after ‘‘defense acquisition program’’.
Subsec. (c)(1). Pub. L. 118–159, § 1701(a)(39)(A), struck
out ‘‘, major automated information system,’’ after
‘‘defense acquisition program’’ in introductory provi-
sions.
Subsec. (c)(2)(H). Pub. L. 118–159, § 1701(a)(39)(C), sub-
stituted ‘‘section 3501 of this title’’ for ‘‘sections 3501
through 3511 of this title’’.
Subsecs. (d), (e). Pub. L. 118–159, § 1701(a)(39)(A),
struck out ‘‘, major automated information system,’’
after ‘‘defense acquisition program’’ wherever appear-
ing.
2021—Pub. L. 116–283, § 1847(b)(1)(A), renumbered sec-
tion 2431a of this title as this section.
Subsec. (c)(2)(B). Pub. L. 116–283, § 1847(b)(2), formerly
§ 1847(b)(2)(B), as redesignated and amended by Pub. L.
117–81, § 1701(s)(1), substituted ‘‘section 4820 of this
title’’ for ‘‘section 2440 of this title’’.
Subsec. (c)(2)(D). Pub. L. 116–283, § 1847(b)(1)(B)(i)(I),
substituted ‘‘section 4324’’ for ‘‘section 2337’’.
Subsec. (c)(2)(F). Pub. L. 116–283, § 1847(b)(1)(B)(i)(II),
substituted ‘‘sections 3771 through 3775’’ for ‘‘section
2320’’.
Subsec. (c)(2)(H). Pub. L. 116–283, § 1847(b)(1)(B)(i)(III),
substituted ‘‘sections 3501 through 3511’’ for ‘‘section
2306b’’.
Subsec. (c)(3). Pub. L. 116–283, § 1847(b)(2)(A), which di-
rected the transfer of section 2440 of this title to sub-
sec. (c)(3) of this section and substitution of ‘‘section
4811’’ for ‘‘section 2501’’ in text, was repealed by Pub. L.
117–81, § 1701(s)(1)(A).
Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 116–283, § 1847(b)(1)(C), which di-
rected amendment of subsec. (e) by striking pars. (1)
and (2) and redesignating pars. (3) to (10) as (1) to (8),
respectively, was executed by striking pars. (1) and (2)
and redesignating former pars. (3) to (9) as (1) to (7), re-
spectively, to reflect the probable intent of Congress,
as no par. (10) had been enacted. Prior to amendment,
pars. (1) and (2) defined ‘‘major defense acquisition pro-
gram’’ and ‘‘major system’’, respectively.
Subsec. (e)(4). Pub. L. 116–283, § 1847(b)(1)(B)(ii)(I), sub-
stituted ‘‘section 4172(e)(7)’’ for ‘‘section 2366(e)(7)’’.
Subsec. (e)(7). Pub. L. 116–283, § 1847(b)(1)(B)(ii)(II),
substituted ‘‘section 4371(a)(2)’’ for ‘‘section 2433(a)(4)’’.
Subsec. (e)(8). Pub. L. 116–283, § 1847(b)(1)(B)(ii)(III),
substituted ‘‘section 4371(a)(3)’’ for ‘‘section 2433(a)(5)’’.
2019—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 116–92 substituted ‘‘Under
Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment’’
for ‘‘Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Tech-
nology, and Logistics’’ in introductory provisions.
2017—Subsec. (d)(1). Pub. L. 115–91 inserted ‘‘(1)’’ be-
fore ‘‘The milestone’’.
2016—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 114–328, § 848(1), in introduc-
tory provisions, inserted ‘‘, or the milestone decision
authority, when the milestone decision authority is the
service acquisition executive of the military depart-
ment that is managing the program,’’ after ‘‘the Under
Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and
Logistics’’.
Subsec. (c)(1). Pub. L. 114–328, § 848(2)(A), in introduc-
tory provisions, inserted ‘‘, or the milestone decision
authority, when the milestone decision authority is the
service acquisition executive of the military depart-
ment that is managing the program,’’ after ‘‘the Under
Secretary’’.
Subsec. (c)(2)(C). Pub. L. 114–328, § 848(2)(B), struck
out ‘‘, in accordance with section 2431b of this title’’
before period at end.
Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 114–328, § 848(3), substituted ‘‘The’’
for ‘‘(1) Subject to the authority, direction, and control
of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition,
Technology, and Logistics, the’’ and, in par. (2), in-
serted ‘‘because of a change described in paragraph
(1)(F)’’ after ‘‘for a program or system’’.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 2021 AMENDMENT
Amendment by Pub. L. 117–81 applicable as if in-
cluded in the enactment of title XVIII of Pub. L. 116–283
as enacted, see section 1701(a)(2) of Pub. L. 117–81, set
out in a note preceding section 3001 of this title and
note below.
Amendment by Pub. L. 116–283 effective Jan. 1, 2022,
with additional provisions for delayed implementation
and applicability of existing law, see section 1801(d) of
Pub. L. 116–283, set out as a note preceding section 3001
of this title.
§ 4212. Risk management and mitigation in major
defense acquisition programs and major sys-
tems
(a) REQUIREMENT.—The Secretary of Defense
shall ensure that the initial acquisition strategy
(required under section 4211 of this title) ap-
proved by the milestone decision authority and
any subsequent revisions include the following:
Cross-references
Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a) Acquisition Strategy Required.—** There shall be an acquisition strategy for each major defense acquisition program and each major system approved by a decision authority.
**(b) Responsible Official.—** For each acquisition strategy required by subsection (a), the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment, or the decision authority, when the decision authority is the service acquisition executive of the military department that is managing the program, is responsible for issuing and maintaining the requirements for—
(1) the content of the strategy; and
(2) the review and approval process for the strategy.
**(c) Considerations.—**
(1) In issuing requirements for the content of an acquisition strategy for a major defense acquisition program or major system, the Under Secretary, or the decision authority, when the decision authority is the service acquisition executive of the military department that is managing the program, shall ensure that—
(A) the strategy clearly describes the proposed business case and capability management approach for the program or system, and to the maximum extent practicable, describes how capability requirements will be met through delivery of such program or system;
(B) the strategy contains a clear explanation of the resources, such as time, funding, and management capacity, necessary to meet capability requirements;
(C) the strategy is tailored to address program requirements and constraints; and
(D) the strategy considers the items listed in paragraph (2).
(2) Each strategy shall, where appropriate, consider the following:
(A) An approach that delivers required capabilities in increments, each depending on available mature technology, and that recognizes up front the need for future capability imp
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 10 U.S.C. § 4211
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.