Browse Arkansas Code titles and sections
21 U.S.C. § 1101 — Congressional findings
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 926
TITLE 21—FOOD AND DRUGS
§ 1101
Sec.
1102.
Congressional declaration of national policy.
1103, 1104. Repealed.
SUBCHAPTER II—DRUG ABUSE POLICY
COORDINATION
1111 to 1114. Repealed.
1115.
Notice relating to the control of dangerous
drugs.
1116 to 1155. Repealed or Omitted.
SUBCHAPTER III—NATIONAL DRUG ABUSE
STRATEGY
1161 to 1165. Repealed.
SUBCHAPTER IV—OTHER FEDERAL PROGRAMS
1171.
Drug abuse prevention function appropria-
tions.
1172 to 1176. Repealed, Transferred, or Omitted.
1177.
Special project grants and contracts.
1178.
Records and audit.
1179.
National Drug Abuse Training Center.
1180.
Transferred.
1181.
Contract authority.
SUBCHAPTER V—NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG
ABUSE
1191 to 1194. Transferred or Repealed.
SUBCHAPTER I—GENERAL PROVISIONS
§ 1101. Congressional findings
The Congress makes the following findings:
(1) Drug abuse is rapidly increasing in the
United States and now afflicts urban, subur-
ban, and rural areas of the Nation.
(2) Drug abuse seriously impairs individual,
as well as societal, health and well-being.
(3) Drug abuse, especially heroin addiction,
substantially contributes to crime.
(4) The adverse impact of drug abuse inflicts
increasing pain and hardship on individuals,
families, and communities and undermines our
institutions.
(5) Too little is known about drug abuse, es-
pecially the causes, and ways to treat and pre-
vent drug abuse.
(6) The success of Federal drug abuse pro-
grams and activities requires a recognition
that education, treatment, rehabilitation, re-
search, training, and law enforcement efforts
are interrelated.
(7) The effectiveness of efforts by State and
local governments and by the Federal Govern-
ment to control and treat drug abuse in the
United States has been ha
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 21 U.S.C. § 1101
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.
Original supplied file — preserved unchanged
Download original Markdown file
File SHA-256: e3b23f772a386fcc7357dbba5ea762594fe44e45a118583084e97506f804a612. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.
Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.
Open the recorded source website ↗
Record provenance
Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:usc2024-223ac66cee0db95d00bccfd9
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code-2024/title-21/section-1101-congressional-findings--147aa8b3ca.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: eb939b27f72daf0ffbd87038ef9c0c83ee29e6bafc1be58e8db65aa30d5a7d0f
Source location: USCODE-2024-title21-chap16-subchapI-sec1101.pdf
Stored source content
Page 926
TITLE 21—FOOD AND DRUGS
§ 1101
Sec.
1102.
Congressional declaration of national policy.
1103, 1104. Repealed.
SUBCHAPTER II—DRUG ABUSE POLICY
COORDINATION
1111 to 1114. Repealed.
1115.
Notice relating to the control of dangerous
drugs.
1116 to 1155. Repealed or Omitted.
SUBCHAPTER III—NATIONAL DRUG ABUSE
STRATEGY
1161 to 1165. Repealed.
SUBCHAPTER IV—OTHER FEDERAL PROGRAMS
1171.
Drug abuse prevention function appropria-
tions.
1172 to 1176. Repealed, Transferred, or Omitted.
1177.
Special project grants and contracts.
1178.
Records and audit.
1179.
National Drug Abuse Training Center.
1180.
Transferred.
1181.
Contract authority.
SUBCHAPTER V—NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG
ABUSE
1191 to 1194. Transferred or Repealed.
SUBCHAPTER I—GENERAL PROVISIONS
§ 1101. Congressional findings
The Congress makes the following findings:
(1) Drug abuse is rapidly increasing in the
United States and now afflicts urban, subur-
ban, and rural areas of the Nation.
(2) Drug abuse seriously impairs individual,
as well as societal, health and well-being.
(3) Drug abuse, especially heroin addiction,
substantially contributes to crime.
(4) The adverse impact of drug abuse inflicts
increasing pain and hardship on individuals,
families, and communities and undermines our
institutions.
(5) Too little is known about drug abuse, es-
pecially the causes, and ways to treat and pre-
vent drug abuse.
(6) The success of Federal drug abuse pro-
grams and activities requires a recognition
that education, treatment, rehabilitation, re-
search, training, and law enforcement efforts
are interrelated.
(7) The effectiveness of efforts by State and
local governments and by the Federal Govern-
ment to control and treat drug abuse in the
United States has been hampered by a lack of
coordination
among
the
States,
between
States and localities, among the Federal Gov-
ernment, States and localities, and through-
out the Federal establishment.
(8) Control of drug abuse requires the devel-
opment of a comprehensive, coordinated long-
term Federal strategy that encompasses both
effective law enforcement against illegal drug
traffic and effective health programs to reha-
bilitate victims of drug abuse.
(9) The increasing rate of drug abuse con-
stitutes a serious and continuing threat to na-
tional health and welfare, requiring an imme-
diate and effective response on the part of the
Federal Government.
(10) Although the Congress observed a sig-
nificant apparent reduction in the rate of in-
crease of drug abuse during the three-year pe-
riod subsequent to March 21, 1972, and in cer-
tain areas of the country apparent temporary
reductions in its incidence, the increase and
spread of heroin consumption since 1974, and
the continuing abuse of other dangerous drugs,
clearly indicate the need for effective, ongo-
ing, and highly visible Federal leadership in
the formation and execution of a comprehen-
sive, coordinated drug abuse policy.
(11) Shifts in the usage of various drugs and
in the Nation’s demographic composition re-
quire a Federal strategy to adjust the focus of
drug abuse programs to meet new needs and
priorities on a cost-effective basis.
(12) The growing extent of drug abuse indi-
cates an urgent need for prevention and inter-
vention programs designed to reach the gen-
eral population and members of high risk pop-
ulations such as youth, women, and the elder-
ly.
(13) Effective control of drug abuse requires
high-level
coordination
of
Federal
inter-
national and domestic activities relating to
both supply of, and demand for, commonly
abused drugs.
(14) Local governments with high concentra-
tions of drug abuse should be actively involved
in the planning and coordination of efforts to
combat drug abuse.
(Pub. L. 92–255, title I, § 101, Mar. 21, 1972, 86
Stat. 66; Pub. L. 94–237, § 1, Mar. 19, 1976, 90 Stat.
241; Pub. L. 96–181, § 2, Jan. 2, 1980, 93 Stat. 1309.)
Editorial Notes
AMENDMENTS
1980—Pars. (11) to (14). Pub. L. 96–181 added pars. (11)
to (14).
1976—Par. (10). Pub. L. 94–237 added par. (10).
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
SHORT TITLE OF 1980 AMENDMENT
Pub. L. 96–181, § 1(a), Jan. 2, 1980, 93 Stat. 1309, pro-
vided that: ‘‘This Act [enacting sections 1111 to 1117 and
1181 of this title, amending this section, sections 1102,
1162, 1164, 1176, 1177, 1180, and 1191 to 1193 of this title,
and sections 218, 300l–2, 300m–3, and 3733 of Title 42, The
Public Health and Welfare, omitting sections 1118 to
1120 and 1131 to 1133 of this title, enacting provisions
set out as notes under this section and section 1193 of
this title, and amending provisions set out as a note
below] may be cited as the ‘Drug Abuse Prevention,
Treatment, and Rehabilitation Amendments of 1979’.’’
SHORT TITLE OF 1978 AMENDMENT
Pub. L. 95–461, § 1, Oct. 14, 1978, 92 Stat. 1268, provided
that: ‘‘This Act [enacting section 1194 of this title,
amending sections 1172, 1176, 1177, 1192, and 1193 of this
title, enacting a provision set out as a note under sec-
tion 1172 of this title and amending a provision set out
as a note under section 242 of Title 42, The Public
Health and Welfare] may be cited as the ‘Drug Abuse
Prevention and Treatment Amendments of 1978’.’’
SHORT TITLE
Pub. L. 92–255, § 1, Mar. 21, 1972, 86 Stat. 65, as amend-
ed by Pub. L. 96–181, § 15(a), Jan. 2, 1980, 93 Stat. 1316,
provided that: ‘‘This Act [enacting this chapter, and
amending sections 5313, 5315, and 5316 of Title 5, Gov-
ernment Organization and Employees, and sections 218,
246, 257, 2684, 2688a, 2688k, 2688n–1, and 2688t of Title 42,
The Public Health and Welfare] may be cited as the
‘Drug Abuse Prevention, Treatment, and Rehabilita-
tion Act’.’’
Page 927
TITLE 21—FOOD AND DRUGS
§§ 1111 to 1114
REFERENCES TO DRUG ABUSE OFFICE AND TREATMENT
ACT OF 1972
Pub. L. 96–181, § 15(b), Jan. 2, 1980, 93 Stat. 1316, pro-
vided in part that: ‘‘Whenever reference is made in any
other Federal law, regulation, ruling, or order to the
Drug Abuse Office and Treatment Act of 1972, the ref-
erence shall be considered to be made to the Drug
Abuse Prevention, Treatment, and Rehabilitation
Act.’’
§ 1102. Congressional declaration of national pol-
icy
The Congress declares that it is the policy of
the United States and the purpose of this chap-
ter to focus the comprehensive resources of the
Federal Government and bring them to bear on
drug abuse with the objective of significantly re-
ducing the incidence, as well as the social and
personal costs, of drug abuse in the United
States, and to develop and assure the implemen-
tation of a comprehensive, coordinated long-
term Federal strategy to combat drug abuse. To
reach these goals, the Congress further declares
that it is the policy of the United States and the
purpose of this chapter to meet the problems of
drug abuse through—
(1) comprehensive Federal, State, and local
planning for, and effective use of, Federal as-
sistance to States and to community-based
programs to meet the urgent needs of special
populations, in coordination with all other
governmental and nongovernmental sources of
assistance;
(2) the development and support of commu-
nity-based prevention programs;
(3) the development and encouragement of
effective occupational prevention and treat-
ment programs within the Government and in
cooperation with the private sector; and
(4) increased Federal commitment to re-
search into the behavioral and biomedical eti-
ology of, the treatment of, and the mental and
physical health and social and economic con-
sequences of, drug abuse.
(Pub. L. 92–255, title I, § 102, Mar. 21, 1972, 86
Stat. 66; Pub. L. 94–237, § 2, Mar. 19, 1976, 90 Stat.
241; Pub. L. 96–181, § 3, Jan. 2, 1980, 93 Stat. 1309.)
Editorial Notes
REFERENCES IN TEXT
This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original
‘‘this Act’’, meaning Pub. L. 92–255, Mar. 21, 1972, 86
Stat. 65, known as the Drug Abuse Prevention, Treat-
ment, and Rehabilitation Act, which comprises this
chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the
Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1101 of
this title and Tables.
AMENDMENTS
1980—Pub. L. 96–181 inserted additional declarations
of policy prescribing methods and programs by which
the goals are to be reached.
1976—Pub. L. 94–237 substituted ‘‘objective of signifi-
cantly reducing the incidence, as well as the social and
personal costs, of drug abuse in the United States, and
to develop and assure the implementation of’’ for ‘‘im-
mediate objective of significantly reducing the inci-
dence of drug abuse in the United States within the
shortest possible period of time, and to develop’’.
§ 1103.
Repealed.
Pub.
L.
100–690,
title
I,
§ 1007(c)(1), Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4187
Section, Pub. L. 92–255, title I, § 103, Mar. 21, 1972, 86
Stat. 67; Pub. L. 94–237, §§ 3, 4(a), Mar. 19, 1976, 90 Stat.
241, defined ‘‘drug abuse prevention function’’, ‘‘drug
traffic prevention function’’, and ‘‘drug abuse func-
tion’’.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
EFFECTIVE DATE OF REPEAL
Repeal effective Jan. 21, 1989, see section 1012 of Pub.
L. 100–690.
§ 1104. Repealed. Pub. L. 94–237, § 4(c)(1), Mar. 19,
1976, 90 Stat. 244
Section, Pub. L. 92–255, title I, § 104, Mar. 21, 1972, 86
Stat. 67, provided, effective June 30, 1975, that the Spe-
cial Action Office for Drug Abuse Prevention, each of
the positions in the Office of Director, Deputy Director,
and Assistant Director, and the National Advisory
Council for Drug Abuse Prevention were abolished and
former subchapter II of this chapter was repealed.
SUBCHAPTER II—DRUG ABUSE POLICY
COORDINATION
§§ 1111 to 1114. Repealed. Pub. L. 100–690, title I,
§ 1007(c)(1), Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4187
Section 1111, Pub. L. 92–255, title II, § 201, as added
Pub. L. 96–181, § 4, Jan. 2, 1980, 93 Stat. 1310; amended
Pub. L. 98–473, title II, § 1306, Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 2170,
related to concentration of Federal effort in drug abuse
prevention.
A prior section 1111, Pub. L. 92–255, title II, § 201, as
added Pub. L. 94–237, § 4(b), Mar. 19, 1976, 90 Stat. 242,
which provided for the establishment of the Office of
Drug Abuse Policy, was omitted in the general revision
of this subchapter by Pub. L. 96–181, § 4, Jan. 2, 1980, 93
Stat. 1309. Previously, the Office of Drug Abuse Policy
was abolished and the functions of the Office and its Di-
rector were transferred to the President by sections 3
and 5 of Reorg. Plan No. 1 of 1977, effective Mar. 27, 1978,
as provided by Ex. Ord. No. 12045, Mar. 27, 1978, 43 F.R.
13347, set out as notes preceding section 101 of Title 3,
The President.
Another prior section 1111, Pub. L. 92–255, title II,
§ 201, Mar. 21, 1972, 86 Stat. 67, which provided for the es-
tablishment of the Special Action Office for Drug
Abuse Prevention, was repealed by Pub. L. 92–255, title
I, § 104, Mar. 21, 1972, 86 Stat. 67, eff. June 30, 1975.
Section 1112, Pub. L. 92–255, title II, § 202, as added
Pub. L. 96–181, § 4, Jan. 2, 1980, 93 Stat. 1310, related to
designation of a representative to direct activities re-
quired by this subchapter.
A prior section 1112, Pub. L. 92–255, title II, § 202, as
added Pub. L. 94–237, § 4(b), Mar. 19, 1976, 90 Stat. 242;
amended Pub. L. 95–83, title III, § 311(d), Aug. 1, 1977, 91
Stat. 398, which provided for the appointment of the Di-
rector of the Office of Drug Abuse Policy, was omitted
in the general revision of this subchapter by Pub. L.
96–181, § 4, Jan. 2, 1980, 93 Stat. 1309.
Another prior section 1112, Pub. L. 92–255, title II,
§ 202, Mar. 21, 1972, 86 Stat. 68, which provided for the
appointment of a Director of the Special Action Office
for Drug Abuse Prevention, was repealed by Pub. L.
92–255, title I, § 104, Mar. 21, 1972, 86 Stat. 67, eff. June
30, 1975.
Section 1113, Pub. L. 92–255, title II, § 203, as added
Pub. L. 96–181, § 4, Jan. 2, 1980, 93 Stat. 1310, related to
employment of officers and employees.
A prior section 1113, Pub. L. 92–255, title II, § 203, as
added Pub. L. 94–237, § 4(b), Mar. 19, 1976, 90 Stat. 242,
which provided for the appointment and functions of
Deputy Director of the Office of Drug Abuse Policy,
was omitted in the general revision of this subchapter
by Pub. L. 96–181, § 4, Jan. 2, 1980, 93 Stat. 1309.
Another prior section 1113, Pub. L. 92–255, title II,
§ 203, Mar. 21, 1972, 86 Stat. 68, which provided for the
appointment of a Deputy Director of the Special Office
for Drug Abuse Prevention, was repealed by Pub. L.
Cross-references
Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
The Congress makes the following findings:
(1) Drug abuse is rapidly increasing in the United States and now afflicts urban, suburban, and rural areas of the Nation.
(2) Drug abuse seriously impairs individual, as well as societal, health and well-being.
(3) Drug abuse, especially heroin addiction, substantially contributes to crime.
(4) The adverse impact of drug abuse inflicts increasing pain and hardship on individuals, families, and communities and undermines our institutions.
(5) Too little is known about drug abuse, especially the causes, and ways to treat and prevent drug abuse.
(6) The success of Federal drug abuse programs and activities requires a recognition that education, treatment, rehabilitation, research, training, and law enforcement efforts are interrelated.
(7) The effectiveness of efforts by State and local governments and by the Federal Government to control and treat drug abuse in the United States has been hampered by a lack of coordination among the States, between States and localities, among the Federal Government, States and localities, and throughout the Federal establishment.
(8) Control of drug abuse requires the development of a comprehensive, coordinated long-term Federal strategy that encompasses both effective law enforcement against illegal drug traffic and effective health programs to rehabilitate victims of drug abuse.
(9) The increasing rate of drug abuse constitutes a serious and continuing threat to national health and welfare, requiring an immediate and effective response on the part of the Federal Government.
(10) Although the Congress observed a significant apparent reduction in the rate of increase of drug abuse during the three-year period subsequent to March 21, 1972, and in certain areas of the country apparent te
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 21 U.S.C. § 1101
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.