Browse Arkansas Code titles and sections
39 U.S.C. § 3622 — Modern rate regulation
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 101
TITLE 39—POSTAL SERVICE
§ 3622
Pub. L. 103–31, § 8(h)(4), May 20, 1993, 107 Stat. 86,
added item 3629.
SUBCHAPTER I—PROVISIONS RELATING TO
MARKET-DOMINANT PRODUCTS
Editorial Notes
PRIOR PROVISIONS
A prior subchapter I of this chapter consisted of sec-
tions 3601 to 3604, prior to amendment by Pub. L.
109–435, title VI, § 601(a)(2), (3), Dec. 20, 2006, 120 Stat.
3238, 3239, which struck out the subchapter heading
‘‘POSTAL RATE COMMISSION’’ and sections 3601 and
3602 and renumbered sections 3603 and 3604 as sections
503 and 504 of this title, respectively, and transferred
those sections to chapter 5 of this title.
Section 3601, Pub. L. 91–375, Aug. 12, 1970, 84 Stat. 759;
Pub. L. 94–421, § 3(a), Sept. 24, 1976, 90 Stat. 1304; Pub. L.
103–123, title VII, § 708(c), Oct. 28, 1993, 107 Stat. 1273, re-
lated to establishment of the Postal Rate Commission.
Section 3602, Pub. L. 91–375, Aug. 12, 1970, 84 Stat. 759,
related to terms of office of the Commissioners of the
Postal Rate Commission.
AMENDMENTS
2006—Pub. L. 109–435, title II, § 201(c), Dec. 20, 2006, 120
Stat. 3205, redesignated subchapter II of this chapter as
this subchapter and substituted ‘‘PROVISIONS RE-
LATING TO MARKET-DOMINANT PRODUCTS’’ for
‘‘PERMANENT RATES AND CLASSES OF MAIL’’ in
subchapter heading.
§ 3621. Applicability; definitions
(a)
APPLICABILITY.—This
subchapter
shall
apply with respect to—
(1) first-class mail letters and sealed parcels;
(2) first-class mail cards;
(3) periodicals;
(4) standard mail;
(5) single-piece parcel post;
(6) media mail;
(7) bound printed matter;
(8) library mail;
(9) special services; and
(10) single-piece international mail,
subject to any changes the Postal Regulatory
Commission may make under section 3642.
(b) RULE OF CONSTRU
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 39 U.S.C. § 3622
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.
Original supplied file — preserved unchanged
Download original Markdown file
File SHA-256: 883b63cbff680c397d258786327571d20f8c5f16c66cfd964bc25f72de03efe5. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.
Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.
Open the recorded source website ↗
Record provenance
Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:usc2024-20086239e464b9f4787a24dd
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code-2024/title-39/section-3622-modern-rate-regulation--e0fc744b3a.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: e2686da0ed1ceebfde937bd8f63589a960e3bd3209cad289cc817497a11daf47
Source location: USCODE-2024-title39-partIV-chap36-subchapI-sec3622.pdf
Stored source content
Page 101
TITLE 39—POSTAL SERVICE
§ 3622
Pub. L. 103–31, § 8(h)(4), May 20, 1993, 107 Stat. 86,
added item 3629.
SUBCHAPTER I—PROVISIONS RELATING TO
MARKET-DOMINANT PRODUCTS
Editorial Notes
PRIOR PROVISIONS
A prior subchapter I of this chapter consisted of sec-
tions 3601 to 3604, prior to amendment by Pub. L.
109–435, title VI, § 601(a)(2), (3), Dec. 20, 2006, 120 Stat.
3238, 3239, which struck out the subchapter heading
‘‘POSTAL RATE COMMISSION’’ and sections 3601 and
3602 and renumbered sections 3603 and 3604 as sections
503 and 504 of this title, respectively, and transferred
those sections to chapter 5 of this title.
Section 3601, Pub. L. 91–375, Aug. 12, 1970, 84 Stat. 759;
Pub. L. 94–421, § 3(a), Sept. 24, 1976, 90 Stat. 1304; Pub. L.
103–123, title VII, § 708(c), Oct. 28, 1993, 107 Stat. 1273, re-
lated to establishment of the Postal Rate Commission.
Section 3602, Pub. L. 91–375, Aug. 12, 1970, 84 Stat. 759,
related to terms of office of the Commissioners of the
Postal Rate Commission.
AMENDMENTS
2006—Pub. L. 109–435, title II, § 201(c), Dec. 20, 2006, 120
Stat. 3205, redesignated subchapter II of this chapter as
this subchapter and substituted ‘‘PROVISIONS RE-
LATING TO MARKET-DOMINANT PRODUCTS’’ for
‘‘PERMANENT RATES AND CLASSES OF MAIL’’ in
subchapter heading.
§ 3621. Applicability; definitions
(a)
APPLICABILITY.—This
subchapter
shall
apply with respect to—
(1) first-class mail letters and sealed parcels;
(2) first-class mail cards;
(3) periodicals;
(4) standard mail;
(5) single-piece parcel post;
(6) media mail;
(7) bound printed matter;
(8) library mail;
(9) special services; and
(10) single-piece international mail,
subject to any changes the Postal Regulatory
Commission may make under section 3642.
(b) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Mail matter re-
ferred to in subsection (a) shall, for purposes of
this subchapter, be considered to have the mean-
ing given to such mail matter under the mail
classification schedule.
(Added Pub. L. 109–435, title II, § 201(a), Dec. 20,
2006, 120 Stat. 3200.)
Editorial Notes
PRIOR PROVISIONS
A prior section 3621, Pub. L. 91–375, Aug. 12, 1970, 84
Stat. 760, authorized the Governors to fix rates and
classes, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 109–435, title II,
§ 201(a), Dec. 20, 2006, 120 Stat. 3200.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
RATEMAKING LIMITATIONS
Pub. L. 103–123, title VII, § 704(b)(2), Oct. 28, 1993, 107
Stat. 1270, provided that:
‘‘(A) IN
GENERAL.—Except as provided in subpara-
graph (B), rates of postage may not be established,
under subchapter II [now I] of chapter 36 of title 39,
United States Code, in a manner designed to allow the
United States Postal Service to receive through reve-
nues any portion of the additional revenues (referred to
in section 2401(d) of such title, as amended by para-
graph (1)(E)) for which amounts are authorized to be
appropriated under such section 2401(d).
‘‘(B) EXCEPTION.—If Congress fails to appropriate an
amount authorized under section 2401(d) of title 39,
United States Code (as amended by paragraph (1)(E)),
rates for the various classes of mail may be adjusted in
accordance with the provisions of subchapter II [now I]
of chapter 36 of such title (excluding section 3627 there-
of) such that the resulting increase in revenues will
equal the amount that Congress so failed to appro-
priate.’’
§ 3622. Modern rate regulation
(a) AUTHORITY GENERALLY.—The Postal Regu-
latory Commission shall, within 18 months after
the date of enactment of this section, by regula-
tion establish (and may from time to time
thereafter by regulation revise) a modern sys-
tem for regulating rates and classes for market-
dominant products.
(b) OBJECTIVES.—Such system shall be de-
signed to achieve the following objectives, each
of which shall be applied in conjunction with the
others:
(1) To maximize incentives to reduce costs
and increase efficiency.
(2) To create predictability and stability in
rates.
(3) To maintain high quality service stand-
ards established under section 3691.
(4) To allow the Postal Service pricing flexi-
bility.
(5) To assure adequate revenues, including
retained earnings, to maintain financial sta-
bility.
(6) To reduce the administrative burden and
increase the transparency of the ratemaking
process.
(7) To enhance mail security and deter ter-
rorism.
(8) To establish and maintain a just and rea-
sonable schedule for rates and classifications,
however the objective under this paragraph
shall not be construed to prohibit the Postal
Service from making changes of unequal mag-
nitude within, between, or among classes of
mail.
(9) To allocate the total institutional costs
of the Postal Service appropriately between
market-dominant and competitive products.
(c) FACTORS.—In establishing or revising such
system, the Postal Regulatory Commission shall
take into account—
(1) the value of the mail service actually
provided each class or type of mail service to
both the sender and the recipient, including
but not limited to the collection, mode of
transportation, and priority of delivery;
(2) the requirement that each class of mail
or type of mail service bear the direct and in-
direct postal costs attributable to each class
or type of mail service through reliably identi-
fied causal relationships plus that portion of
all other costs of the Postal Service reason-
ably assignable to such class or type;
(3) the effect of rate increases upon the gen-
eral public, business mail users, and enter-
prises in the private sector of the economy en-
gaged in the delivery of mail matter other
than letters;
Page 102
TITLE 39—POSTAL SERVICE
§ 3622
(4) the available alternative means of send-
ing and receiving letters and other mail mat-
ter at reasonable costs;
(5) the degree of preparation of mail for de-
livery into the postal system performed by the
mailer and its effect upon reducing costs to
the Postal Service;
(6) simplicity of structure for the entire
schedule and simple, identifiable relationships
between the rates or fees charged the various
classes of mail for postal services;
(7) the importance of pricing flexibility to
encourage increased mail volume and oper-
ational efficiency;
(8) the relative value to the people of the
kinds of mail matter entered into the postal
system and the desirability and justification
for special classifications and services of mail;
(9) the importance of providing classifica-
tions with extremely high degrees of reli-
ability and speed of delivery and of providing
those that do not require high degrees of reli-
ability and speed of delivery;
(10) the desirability of special classifications
for both postal users and the Postal Service in
accordance with the policies of this title, in-
cluding agreements between the Postal Serv-
ice and postal users, when available on public
and reasonable terms to similarly situated
mailers, that—
(A) either—
(i) improve the net financial position of
the Postal Service through reducing Post-
al Service costs or increasing the overall
contribution to the institutional costs of
the Postal Service; or
(ii) enhance the performance of mail
preparation, processing, transportation, or
other functions; and
(B) do not cause unreasonable harm to the
marketplace.
(11) the educational, cultural, scientific, and
informational value to the recipient of mail
matter;
(12) the need for the Postal Service to in-
crease its efficiency and reduce its costs, in-
cluding infrastructure costs, to help maintain
high quality, affordable postal services;
(13) the value to the Postal Service and post-
al users of promoting intelligent mail and of
secure, sender-identified mail; and
(14) the policies of this title as well as such
other factors as the Commission determines
appropriate.
(d) REQUIREMENTS.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The system for regulating
rates and classes for market-dominant prod-
ucts shall—
(A) include an annual limitation on the
percentage changes in rates to be set by the
Postal Regulatory Commission that will be
equal to the change in the Consumer Price
Index for All Urban Consumers unadjusted
for seasonal variation over the most recent
available 12-month period preceding the date
the Postal Service files notice of its inten-
tion to increase rates;
(B) establish a schedule whereby rates,
when necessary and appropriate, would
change at regular intervals by predictable
amounts;
(C) not later than 45 days before the imple-
mentation of any adjustment in rates under
this section, including adjustments made
under subsection (c)(10)—
(i) require the Postal Service to provide
public notice of the adjustment;
(ii) provide an opportunity for review by
the Postal Regulatory Commission;
(iii) provide for the Postal Regulatory
Commission to notify the Postal Service of
any noncompliance of the adjustment with
the limitation under subparagraph (A); and
(iv) require the Postal Service to respond
to the notice provided under clause (iii)
and describe the actions to be taken to
comply with the limitation under subpara-
graph (A);
(D) establish procedures whereby the Post-
al Service may adjust rates not in excess of
the annual limitations under subparagraph
(A); and
(E) notwithstanding any limitation set
under subparagraphs (A) and (C), and pro-
vided there is not sufficient unused rate au-
thority under paragraph (2)(C), establish
procedures whereby rates may be adjusted
on an expedited basis due to either extraor-
dinary or exceptional circumstances, pro-
vided that the Commission determines, after
notice and opportunity for a public hearing
and comment, and within 90 days after any
request by the Postal Service, that such ad-
justment is reasonable and equitable and
necessary to enable the Postal Service,
under best practices of honest, efficient, and
economical management, to maintain and
continue the development of postal services
of the kind and quality adapted to the needs
of the United States.
(2) LIMITATIONS.—
(A) CLASSES OF MAIL.—Except as provided
under subparagraph (C), the annual limita-
tions under paragraph (1)(A) shall apply to a
class of mail, as defined in the Domestic
Mail Classification Schedule as in effect on
the date of enactment of the Postal Ac-
countability and Enhancement Act.
(B) ROUNDING OF RATES AND FEES.—Nothing
in this subsection shall preclude the Postal
Service from rounding rates and fees to the
nearest whole integer, if the effect of such
rounding does not cause the overall rate in-
crease for any class to exceed the Consumer
Price Index for All Urban Consumers.
(C) USE OF UNUSED RATE AUTHORITY.—
(i) DEFINITION.—In this subparagraph,
the term ‘‘unused rate adjustment author-
ity’’ means the difference between—
(I) the maximum amount of a rate ad-
justment that the Postal Service is au-
thorized to make in any year subject to
the annual limitation under paragraph
(1); and
(II) the amount of the rate adjustment
the Postal Service actually makes in
that year.
(ii) AUTHORITY.—Subject to clause (iii),
the Postal Service may use any unused
rate adjustment authority for any of the 5
years following the year such authority
occurred.
Page 103
TITLE 39—POSTAL SERVICE
[§§ 3623 to 3625
(iii) LIMITATIONS.—In exercising the au-
thority under clause (ii) in any year, the
Postal Service—
(I) may use unused rate adjustment au-
thority from more than 1 year;
(II) may use any part of the unused
rate adjustment authority from any
year;
(III) shall use the unused rate adjust-
ment authority from the earliest year
such authority first occurred and then
each following year; and
(IV) for any class or service, may not
exceed the annual limitation under para-
graph (1) by more than 2 percentage
points.
(3) REVIEW.—Ten years after the date of en-
actment of the Postal Accountability and En-
hancement Act and as appropriate thereafter,
the Commission shall review the system for
regulating rates and classes for market-domi-
nant products established under this section
to determine if the system is achieving the ob-
jectives in subsection (b), taking into account
the factors in subsection (c). If the Commis-
sion determines, after notice and opportunity
for public comment, that the system is not
achieving the objectives in subsection (b), tak-
ing into account the factors in subsection (c),
the Commission may, by regulation, make
such modification or adopt such alternative
system for regulating rates and classes for
market-dominant products as necessary to
achieve the objectives.
(e) WORKSHARE DISCOUNTS.—
(1) DEFINITION.—In this subsection, the term
‘‘workshare discount’’ refers to rate discounts
provided
to
mailers
for
the
presorting,
prebarcoding, handling, or transportation of
mail, as further defined by the Postal Regu-
latory Commission under subsection (a).
(2) SCOPE.—The Postal Regulatory Commis-
sion shall ensure that such discounts do not
exceed the cost that the Postal Service avoids
as a result of workshare activity, unless—
(A) the discount is—
(i) associated with a new postal service,
a change to an existing postal service, or
with a new work share initiative related to
an existing postal service; and
(ii) necessary to induce mailer behavior
that furthers the economically efficient
operation of the Postal Service and the
portion of the discount in excess of the
cost that the Postal Service avoids as a re-
sult of the workshare activity will be
phased out over a limited period of time;
(B) the amount of the discount above costs
avoided—
(i) is necessary to mitigate rate shock;
and
(ii) will be phased out over time;
(C) the discount is provided in connection
with subclasses of mail consisting exclu-
sively of mail matter of educational, cul-
tural, scientific, or informational value; or
(D) reduction or elimination of the dis-
count would impede the efficient operation
of the Postal Service.
(3) LIMITATION.—Nothing in this subsection
shall require that a work share discount be re-
duced or eliminated if the reduction or elimi-
nation of the discount would—
(A) lead to a loss of volume in the affected
category or subclass of mail and reduce the
aggregate contribution to the institutional
costs of the Postal Service from the cat-
egory or subclass subject to the discount
below what it otherwise would have been if
the discount had not been reduced or elimi-
nated; or
(B) result in a further increase in the rates
paid by mailers not able to take advantage
of the discount.
(4) REPORT.—Whenever the Postal Service
establishes a workshare discount rate, the
Postal Service shall, at the time it publishes
the workshare discount rate, submit to the
Postal Regulatory Commission a detailed re-
port that—
(A) explains the Postal Service’s reasons
for establishing the rate;
(B) sets forth the data, economic analyses,
and other information relied on by the Post-
al Service to justify the rate; and
(C) certifies that the discount will not ad-
versely affect rates or services provided to
users of postal services who do not take ad-
vantage of the discount rate.
(f) TRANSITION RULE.—For the 1-year period
beginning on the date of enactment of this sec-
tion, rates and classes for market-dominant
products shall remain subject to modification in
accordance with the provisions of this chapter
and section 407, as such provisions were last in
effect before the date of enactment of this sec-
tion. Proceedings initiated to consider a request
for a recommended decision filed by the Postal
Service during that 1-year period shall be com-
pleted in accordance with subchapter II of chap-
ter 36 of this title and implementing regula-
tions, as in effect before the date of enactment
of this section.
(Added Pub. L. 109–435, title II, § 201(a), Dec. 20,
2006, 120 Stat. 3201.)
Editorial Notes
REFERENCES IN TEXT
The date of enactment of this section and the date of
enactment of the Postal Accountability and Enhance-
ment Act, referred to in subsecs. (a), (d)(2)(A), (3), and
(f), are the date of enactment of Pub. L. 109–435, which
was approved Dec. 20, 2006.
PRIOR PROVISIONS
A prior section 3622, Pub. L. 91–375, Aug. 12, 1970, 84
Stat. 760; Pub. L. 94–421, § 10, Sept. 24, 1976, 90 Stat. 1311;
Pub. L. 105–241, § 5, Sept. 28, 1998, 112 Stat. 1573; Pub. L.
106–384, § 1(a), Oct. 27, 2000, 114 Stat. 1460, related to
rates and fees, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 109–435, title
II, § 201(a), Dec. 20, 2006, 120 Stat. 3200.
[§§ 3623 to 3625. Repealed. Pub. L. 109–435, title
II, § 201(b), Dec. 20, 2006, 120 Stat. 3205]
Section 3623, Pub. L. 91–375, Aug. 12, 1970, 84 Stat. 761;
Pub. L. 94–421, § 8, Sept. 24, 1976, 90 Stat. 1310, related to
mail classification.
Section 3624, Pub. L. 91–375, Aug. 12, 1970, 84 Stat. 761;
Pub. L. 94–421, § 5(a), Sept. 24, 1976, 90 Stat. 1306, related
Cross-references
Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a) Authority Generally.—** The Postal Regulatory Commission shall, within 18 months after the date of enactment of this section, by regulation establish (and may from time to time thereafter by regulation revise) a modern system for regulating rates and classes for market-dominant products.
**(b) Objectives.—** Such system shall be designed to achieve the following objectives, each of which shall be applied in conjunction with the others:
(1) To maximize incentives to reduce costs and increase efficiency.
(2) To create predictability and stability in rates.
(3) To maintain high quality service standards established under section 3691.
(4) To allow the Postal Service pricing flexibility.
(5) To assure adequate revenues, including retained earnings, to maintain financial stability.
(6) To reduce the administrative burden and increase the transparency of the ratemaking process.
(7) To enhance mail security and deter terrorism.
(8) To establish and maintain a just and reasonable schedule for rates and classifications, however the objective under this paragraph shall not be construed to prohibit the Postal Service from making changes of unequal magnitude within, between, or among classes of mail.
(9) To allocate the total institutional costs of the Postal Service appropriately between market-dominant and competitive products.
**(c) Factors.—** In establishing or revising such system, the Postal Regulatory Commission shall take into account—
(1) the value of the mail service actually provided each class or type of mail service to both the sender and the recipient, including but not limited to the collection, mode of transportation, and priority of delivery;
(2) the requirement that each class of mail or type of mail service bear the direct and indirect postal
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 39 U.S.C. § 3622
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.