28 U.S.C. § 1738A — Full faith and credit given to child cus-

Page 448 TITLE 28—JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE § 1736 court of the United States, the clerk of such court and the United States attorney for the dis- trict shall take the steps necessary to restore such records or files, under the direction of the judges of such court. (June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 946.) HISTORICAL AND REVISION NOTES Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §§ 685, 686 (R.S. §§ 903, 904; Jan. 31, 1879, ch. 39, §§ 2, 3, 20 Stat. 277). A provision of section 686 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., relating to allowances to clerks and United States at- torneys for their services, and disbursements incidental to restoring lost records under such section was deleted as obsolete, in view of sections 508, 509, and 604 of this title, placing such officers on a salary basis and pro- viding for their expenses. Words ‘‘And in all cases where any of the files, pa- pers, or records of any court of the United States have been or shall be lost or destroyed, the files, records and papers which, pursuant to law, may have been or may be restored or supplied in place of such records, files, and papers, shall have the same force and effect, to all intents and purposes, as the originals thereof would have been entitled to,’’ at the end of section 685 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., were omitted as fully covered by the remainder of this section and by section 1734 of this title. Words ‘‘or agency of the United States’’ were sub- stituted for ‘‘of the Government’’ so as to eliminate any possible ambiguity as to the scope of this section. See definitive section 451 of this title. The phrase ‘‘so far as the judges of such courts re- spectively shall deem it essential to the interests of the United States that such records and files be restored or supplied,’’ was omitted as unnecessary. Changes were made in phraseology. § 1736. Congressional Journals Extracts from the Journals of the Senate and the House of Representatives, and from the Ex- ecutive Journal of the Senate when the injunc- tion of secrecy is removed, certified by the Sec- retary of the Senate or the Clerk of the House of Representatives shall be received in evidence with the same effect as the originals would have. (June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 947.) HISTORICAL AND REVISION NOTES Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., § 676 (R.S. § 895). Changes in phraseology were made. § 1737. Copy of officer’s bond Any person to whose custody the bond of any officer of the United States has been committed shall, on proper request and payment of the fee allowed by any Act of Congress, furnish certified copies thereof, which shall be prima facie evi- dence in any court of the execution, filing and contents of the bond. (June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 947.) HISTORICAL AND REVISION NOTES Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §§ 326, 499, 513, and 514 (R.S. §§ 783, 795; Feb. 22, 1875, ch. 95, § 3, 18 Stat. 333; Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §§ 220, 291, 36 Stat. 1152, 1167). Sections 326, 499, 513, and 514 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., were consolidated. They related to the bonds of particular officers, namely the Clerk of the Supreme Court, the United States marshals, and the clerks of the district courts. The revised section eliminates all inconsistent provisions of such sections. The requirement that certified copies be furnished is new. The other provisions of sections 326, 499, 513, and 514 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., are now incorporated in sec- tions 544 and 952 of this title. Changes were made in phraseology. § 1738. State and Territorial statutes and judicial proceedings; full faith and credit The Acts of the legislature of any State, Terri- tory, or Possession of the United States, or cop- ies thereof, shall be authenticated by affixing the seal of such State, Territory or Possession thereto. The records and judicial proceedings of any court of any such State, Territory or Possession, or copies thereof, shall be proved or admitted in other courts within the United States and its Territories and Possessions by the attestation of the clerk and seal of the court annexed, if a seal exists, together with a certificate of a judge of the court that the said attestation is in proper form. Such Acts, records and judicial proceedings or copies thereof, so authenticated, shall have the same full faith and credit in every court within the United States and its Territories and Posses- sions as they have by law or usage in the courts of such State, Territory or Possession from which they are taken. (June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 947.) HISTORICAL AND REVISION NOTES Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., § 687 (R.S. § 905). Words ‘‘Possession of the United States’’ were sub- stituted for ‘‘of any country subject to the jurisdiction of the United States’’. Words ‘‘or copies thereof’’ were added in three places. Copies have always been used to prove statutes and ju- dicial proceedings under section 687 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed. The added words will cover expressly such use. Words ‘‘and its Territories and Possessions’’ were added in two places so as to make this section and sec- tion 1739 of this title uniform, the basic section of the latter having provided that nonjudicial records or books of any State, Territory, or ‘‘country subject to the jurisdiction of the United States’’ should be admit- ted in any court or office in any other State, Territory, or ‘‘such country.’’ Words ‘‘a judge of the court’’ were substituted for ‘‘the judge, chief justice or presiding magistrate’’ with- out change of substance. At the beginning of the last paragraph, words ‘‘Such Acts’’ were substituted for ‘‘And the said’’. This follows the language of Article IV, section 1 of the Constitu- tion. For additional provisions as to authentication, see Rule 44 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Changes were made in phraseology. § 1738A. Full faith and credit given to child cus- tody determinations (a) The appropriate authorities of every State shall enforce according to its terms, and shall not modify except as provided in subsections (f), (g), and (h) of this section, any custody deter- mination or visitation determination made con- sistently with the provisions of this section by a court of another State. (b) As used in this section, the term— (1) ‘‘child’’ means a person under the age of eighteen; (2) ‘‘contestant’’ means a person, including a parent or grandparent, who claims a right to custody or visitation of a child; Page 449 TITLE 28—JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE § 1738A (3) ‘‘custody determination’’ means a judg- ment, decree, or other order of a court pro- viding for the custody of a child, and includes permanent and temporary orders, and initial orders and modifications; (4) ‘‘home State’’ means the State in which, immediately preceding the time involved, the child lived with his parents, a parent, or a per- son acting as parent, for at least six consecu- tive months, and in the case of a child less than six months old, the State in which the child lived from birth with any of such per- sons. Periods of temporary absence of any of such persons are counted as part of the six- month or other period; (5) ‘‘modification’’ and ‘‘modify’’ refer to a custody or visitation determination which modifies, replaces, supersedes, or otherwise is made subsequent to, a prior custody or visita- tion determination concerning the same child, whether made by the same court or not; (6) ‘‘person acting as a parent’’ means a per- son, other than a parent, who has physical custody of a child and who has either been awarded custody by a court or claims a right to custody; (7) ‘‘physical custody’’ means actual posses- sion and control of a child; (8) ‘‘State’’ means a State of the United States, the District of Columbia, the Common- wealth of Puerto Rico, or a territory or posses- sion of the United States; and (9) ‘‘visitation determination’’ means a judg- ment, decree, or other order of a court pro- viding for the visitation of a child and in- cludes permanent and temporary orders and initial orders and modifications. (c) A child custody or visitation determination made by a court of a State is consistent with the provisions of this section only if— (1) such court has jurisdiction under the law of such State; and (2) one of the following conditions is met: (A) such State (i) is the home State of the child on the date of the commencement of the proceeding, or (ii) had been the child’s home State within six months before the date of the commencement of the proceeding and the child is absent from such State be- cause of his removal or retention by a con- testant or for other reasons, and a contest- ant continues to live in such State; (B)(i) it appears that no other State would have jurisdiction under subparagraph (A), and (ii) it is in the best interest of the child that a court of such State assume jurisdic- tion because (I) the child and his parents, or the child and at least one contestant, have a significant connection with such State other than mere physical presence in such State, and (II) there is available in such State sub- stantial evidence concerning the child’s present or future care, protection, training, and personal relationships; (C) the child is physically present in such State and (i) the child has been abandoned, or (ii) it is necessary in an emergency to protect the child because the child, a sibling, or parent of the child has been subjected to or threatened with mistreatment or abuse; (D)(i) it appears that no other State would have jurisdiction under subparagraph (A), (B), (C), or (E), or another State has declined to exercise jurisdiction on the ground that the State whose jurisdiction is in issue is the more appropriate forum to determine the custody or visitation of the child, and (ii) it is in the best interest of the child that such court assume jurisdiction; or (E) the court has continuing jurisdiction pursuant to subsection (d) of this section. (d) The jurisdiction of a court of a State which has made a child custody or visitation deter- mination consistently with the provisions of this section continues as long as the require- ment of subsection (c)(1) of this section con- tinues to be met and such State remains the res- idence of the child or of any contestant. (e) Before a child custody or visitation deter- mination is made, reasonable notice and oppor- tunity to be heard shall be given to the contest- ants, any parent whose parental rights have not been previously terminated and any person who has physical custody of a child. (f) A court of a State may modify a determina- tion of the custody of the same child made by a court of another State, if— (1) it has jurisdiction to make such a child custody determination; and (2) the court of the other State no longer has jurisdiction, or it has declined to exercise such jurisdiction to modify such determination. (g) A court of a State shall not exercise juris- diction in any proceeding for a custody or visi- tation determination commenced during the pendency of a proceeding in a court of another State where such court of that other State is ex- ercising jurisdiction consistently with the provi- sions of this section to make a custody or visita- tion determination. (h) A court of a State may not modify a visita- tion determination made by a court of another State unless the court of the other State no longer has jurisdiction to modify such deter- mination or has declined to exercise jurisdiction to modify such determination. (Added Pub. L. 96–611, § 8(a), Dec. 28, 1980, 94 Stat. 3569; amended Pub. L. 105–374, § 1, Nov. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 3383; Pub. L. 106–386, div. B, title III, § 1303(d), Oct. 28, 2000, 114 Stat. 1512.) Editorial Notes AMENDMENTS 2000—Subsec. (c)(2)(C)(ii). Pub. L. 106–386 substituted ‘‘the child, a sibling, or parent of the child’’ for ‘‘he’’. 1998—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 105–374, § 1(a), substituted ‘‘subsections (f), (g), and (h) of this section, any cus- tody determination or visitation determination’’ for ‘‘subsection (f) of this section, any child custody deter- mination’’. Subsec. (b)(2). Pub. L. 105–374, § 1(b), inserted ‘‘or grandparent’’ after ‘‘parent’’. Subsec. (b)(3). Pub. L. 105–374, § 1(c), struck out ‘‘or visitation’’ after ‘‘for the custody’’. Subsec. (b)(5). Pub. L. 105–374, § 1(d), substituted ‘‘cus- tody or visitation determination’’ for ‘‘custody deter- mination’’ in two places. Subsec. (b)(9). Pub. L. 105–374, § 1(e), added par. (9). Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 105–374, § 1(f), substituted ‘‘cus- tody or visitation determination’’ for ‘‘custody deter- mination’’ in introductory provisions. Subsec. (c)(2)(D)(i). Pub. L. 105–374, § 1(g), inserted ‘‘or visitation’’ after ‘‘determine the custody’’. Page 450 TITLE 28—JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE § 1738B Subsecs. (d), (e). Pub. L. 105–374, § 1(h), (i), substituted ‘‘custody or visitation determination’’ for ‘‘custody de- termination’’. Subsec. (g). Pub. L. 105–374, § 1(j), which directed sub- stitution of ‘‘custody or visitation determination’’ for ‘‘custody determination’’, was executed by making the substitution in two places to reflect the probable intent of Congress. Subsec. (h). Pub. L. 105–374, § 1(k), added subsec. (h). Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries REPORT ON EFFECTS OF PARENTAL KIDNAPING LAWS IN DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CASES Pub. L. 106–386, div. B, title III, § 1303(a)–(c), Oct. 28, 2000, 114 Stat. 1512, provided that: ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—The Attorney General shall— ‘‘(1) conduct a study of Federal and State laws re- lating to child custody, including custody provisions in protection orders, the Uniform Child Custody Ju- risdiction and Enforcement Act adopted by the Na- tional Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws in July 1997, the Parental Kidnaping Pre- vention Act of 1980 [see Short Title of 1980 Amend- ments note set out under section 1305 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare] and the amendments made by that Act, and the effect of those laws on child custody cases in which domestic violence is a factor; and ‘‘(2) submit to Congress a report describing the re- sults of that study, including the effects of imple- menting or applying model State laws, and the rec- ommendations of the Attorney General to reduce the incidence or pattern of violence against women or of sexual assault of the child. ‘‘(b) SUFFICIENCY OF DEFENSES.—In carrying out sub- section (a) with respect to the Parental Kidnaping Pre- vention Act of 1980 and the amendments made by that Act, the Attorney General shall examine the suffi- ciency of defenses to parental abduction charges avail- able in cases involving domestic violence, and the bur- dens and risks encountered by victims of domestic vio- lence arising from jurisdictional requirements of that Act and the amendments made by that Act. ‘‘(c) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There is au- thorized to be appropriated to carry out this section $200,000 for fiscal year 2001.’’ [For definitions of ‘‘domestic violence’’ and ‘‘sexual assault’’ as used in section 1303(a)–(c) of Pub. L. 106–386, set out above, see section 1002 of Pub. L. 106–386, set out as a note under section 10447 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.] CONGRESSIONAL FINDINGS AND DECLARATION OF PURPOSE Pub. L. 96–611, § 7, Dec. 28, 1980, 94 Stat. 3568, provided that: ‘‘(a) The Congress finds that— ‘‘(1) there is a large and growing number of cases annually involving disputes between persons claim- ing rights of custody and visitation of children under the laws, and in the courts, of different States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and the territories and possessions of the United States; ‘‘(2) the laws and practices by which the courts of those jurisdictions determine their jurisdiction to de- cide such disputes, and the effect to be given the deci- sions of such disputes by the courts of other jurisdic- tions, are often inconsistent and conflicting; ‘‘(3) those characteristics of the law and practice in such cases, along with the limits imposed by a Fed- eral system on the authority of each such jurisdic- tion to conduct investigations and take other actions outside its own boundaries, contribute to a tendency of parties involved in such disputes to frequently re- sort to the seizure, restraint, concealment, and inter- state transportation of children, the disregard of court orders, excessive relitigation of cases, obtain- ing of conflicting orders by the courts of various ju- risdictions, and interstate travel and communication that is so expensive and time consuming as to disrupt their occupations and commercial activities; and ‘‘(4) among the results of those conditions and ac- tivities are the failure of the courts of such jurisdic- tions to give full faith and credit to the judicial pro- ceedings of the other jurisdictions, the deprivation of rights of liberty and property without due process of law, burdens on commerce among such jurisdictions and with foreign nations, and harm to the welfare of children and their parents and other custodians. ‘‘(b) For those reasons it is necessary to establish a national system for locating parents and children who travel from one such jurisdiction to another and are concealed in connection with such disputes, and to es- tablish national standards under which the courts of such jurisdictions will determine their jurisdiction to decide such disputes and the effect to be given by each such jurisdiction to such decisions by the courts of other such jurisdictions. ‘‘(c) The general purposes of sections 6 to 10 of this Act [enacting this section and section 663 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, amending sections 654 and 655 Title 42, and enacting provisions set out as notes under this section, sections 663 and 1305 of Title 42, and section 1073 of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure] are to— ‘‘(1) promote cooperation between State courts to the end that a determination of custody and visita- tion is rendered in the State which can best decide the case in the interest of the child; ‘‘(2) promote and expand the exchange of informa- tion and other forms of mutual assistance between States which are concerned with the same child; ‘‘(3) facilitate the enforcement of custody and visi- tation decrees of sister States; ‘‘(4) discourage continuing interstate controversies over child custody in the interest of greater stability of home environment and of secure family relation- ships for the child; ‘‘(5) avoid jurisdictional competition and conflict between State courts in matters of child custody and visitation which have in the past resulted in the shifting of children from State to State with harmful effects on their well-being; and ‘‘(6) deter interstate abductions and other unilat- eral removals of children undertaken to obtain cus- tody and visitation awards.’’ STATE COURT PROCEEDINGS FOR CUSTODY DETERMINA- TIONS; PRIORITY TREATMENT; FEES, COSTS, AND OTHER EXPENSES Pub. L. 96–611, § 8(c), Dec. 28, 1980, 94 Stat. 3571, pro- vided that: ‘‘In furtherance of the purposes of section 1738A of title 28, United States Code, as added by sub- section (a) of this section, State courts are encouraged to— ‘‘(1) afford priority to proceedings for custody de- terminations; and ‘‘(2) award to the person entitled to custody or visi- tation pursuant to a custody determination which is consistent with the provisions of such section 1738A, necessary travel expenses, attorneys’ fees, costs of private investigations, witness fees or expenses, and other expenses incurred in connection with such cus- tody determination in any case in which— ‘‘(A) a contestant has, without the consent of the person entitled to custody or visitation pursuant to a custody determination which is consistent with the provisions of such section 1738A, (i) wrongfully removed the child from the physical custody of such person, or (ii) wrongfully retained the child after a visit or other temporary relinquishment of physical custody; or ‘‘(B) the court determines it is appropriate.’’ § 1738B. Full faith and credit for child support orders (a) GENERAL RULE.—The appropriate authori- ties of each State—