Arkansas Legal Resource Navigator

50 U.S.C. § 3364 — Assignment of responsibilities relating to

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

50 U.S.C. § 3364 — Assignment of responsibilities relating to

Page 846 TITLE 50—WAR AND NATIONAL DEFENSE § 3364 § 3364. Assignment of responsibilities relating to analytic integrity (a) Assignment of responsibilities For purposes of carrying out section 3024(h) of this title, the Director of National Intelligence shall, not later than 180 days after December 17, 2004, assign an individual or entity to be respon- sible for ensuring that finished intelligence products produced by any element or elements of the intelligence community are timely, objec- tive, independent of political considerations, based upon all sources of available intelligence, and employ the standards of proper analytic tradecraft. (b) Responsibilities (1) The individual or entity assigned responsi- bility under subsection (a)— (A) may be responsible for general oversight and management of analysis and production, but may not be directly responsible for, or in- volved in, the specific production of any fin- ished intelligence product; (B) shall perform, on a regular basis, de- tailed reviews of finished intelligence product or other analytic products by an element or elements of the intelligence community cov- ering a particular topic or subject matter; (C) shall be responsible for identifying on an annual basis functional or topical areas of analysis for specific review under subpara- graph (B); and (D) upon completion of any review under subparagraph (B), may draft lessons learned, identify best practices, or make recommenda- tions for improvement to the analytic tradecraft employed in the production of the reviewed product or products. (2) Each review under paragraph (1)(B) should— (A) include whether the product or products concerned were based on all sources of avail- able intelligence, properly describe the quality and

Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 50 U.S.C. § 3364

Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.

Original supplied file — preserved unchanged

Download original Markdown file

File SHA-256: d136ea76d4391eece4d7f4a4a2395bd758dbc536b80a52283845fa79e7d56fc0. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.

Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.

Open the recorded source website ↗

Record provenance

Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:usc2024-1b15b67dc3bece381e8f5217
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code-2024/title-50/section-3364-assignment-of-responsibilities-relating-to--05920052d7.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: ce58562991088bcf59ec8aaa82a641e010c2e21ad3b3dc582481f1586251606d

Source location: USCODE-2024-title50-chap45-subchapIV-sec3364.pdf

Stored source content

Page 846 TITLE 50—WAR AND NATIONAL DEFENSE § 3364 § 3364. Assignment of responsibilities relating to analytic integrity (a) Assignment of responsibilities For purposes of carrying out section 3024(h) of this title, the Director of National Intelligence shall, not later than 180 days after December 17, 2004, assign an individual or entity to be respon- sible for ensuring that finished intelligence products produced by any element or elements of the intelligence community are timely, objec- tive, independent of political considerations, based upon all sources of available intelligence, and employ the standards of proper analytic tradecraft. (b) Responsibilities (1) The individual or entity assigned responsi- bility under subsection (a)— (A) may be responsible for general oversight and management of analysis and production, but may not be directly responsible for, or in- volved in, the specific production of any fin- ished intelligence product; (B) shall perform, on a regular basis, de- tailed reviews of finished intelligence product or other analytic products by an element or elements of the intelligence community cov- ering a particular topic or subject matter; (C) shall be responsible for identifying on an annual basis functional or topical areas of analysis for specific review under subpara- graph (B); and (D) upon completion of any review under subparagraph (B), may draft lessons learned, identify best practices, or make recommenda- tions for improvement to the analytic tradecraft employed in the production of the reviewed product or products. (2) Each review under paragraph (1)(B) should— (A) include whether the product or products concerned were based on all sources of avail- able intelligence, properly describe the quality and reliability of underlying sources, properly caveat and express uncertainties or confidence in analytic judgments, properly distinguish between underlying intelligence and the as- sumptions and judgments of analysts, and in- corporate, where appropriate, alternative analyses; and (B) ensure that the analytic methodologies, tradecraft, and practices used by the element or elements concerned in the production of the product or products concerned meet the stand- ards set forth in subsection (a). (3) Information drafted under paragraph (1)(D) should, as appropriate, be included in analysis teaching modules and case studies for use throughout the intelligence community. (c) Annual briefings Not later than February 1 each year, the Di- rector of National Intelligence shall provide to the congressional intelligence committees, the heads of the relevant elements of the intel- ligence community, and the heads of analytic training departments a briefing with a descrip- tion, and the associated findings, of each review under subsection (b)(1)(B) during such year. (d) Congressional intelligence committees de- fined In this section, the term ‘‘congressional intel- ligence committees’’ means— (1) the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate; and (2) the Permanent Select Committee on In- telligence of the House of Representatives. (Pub. L. 108–458, title I, § 1019, Dec. 17, 2004, 118 Stat. 3671; Pub. L. 116–92, div. E, title LVII, § 5701(b), Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 2159; Pub. L. 118–159, div. F, title LXIX, § 6901(b), Dec. 23, 2024, 138 Stat. 2516.) Editorial Notes CODIFICATION Section was formerly classified to section 403–1a of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renum- bering as this section. AMENDMENTS 2024—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 118–159 substituted ‘‘Feb- ruary 1’’ for ‘‘December 1’’. 2019—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 116–92 substituted ‘‘brief- ings’’ for ‘‘reports’’ in heading and ‘‘provide to the con- gressional intelligence committees, the heads of the relevant elements of the intelligence community, and the heads of analytic training departments a briefing with’’ for ‘‘submit to the congressional intelligence committees, the heads of the relevant elements of the intelligence community, and the heads of analytic training departments a report containing’’ in text. Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries EFFECTIVE DATE For Determination by President that section take ef- fect on Apr. 21, 2005, see Memorandum of President of the United States, Apr. 21, 2005, 70 F.R. 23925, set out as a note under section 3001 of this title. Section effective not later than six months after Dec. 17, 2004, except as otherwise expressly provided, see sec- tion 1097(a) of Pub. L. 108–458, set out in an Effective Date of 2004 Amendment; Transition Provisions note under section 3001 of this title. ANNUAL TRAINING REQUIREMENT AND REPORT REGARDING ANALYTIC STANDARDS Pub. L. 117–263, div. F, title LXIII, § 6312, Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 3510, provided that: ‘‘(a) POLICY FOR TRAINING PROGRAM REQUIRED.—Con- sistent with sections 1019 and 1020 of the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 [Pub. L. 108–458] (50 U.S.C. 3364 and 3364 note), the Director of National Intelligence shall issue a policy that requires each head of an element of the intelligence community, that has not already done so, to create, before the date that is 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act [Dec. 23, 2022], an annual training program on the standards set forth in Intelligence Community Direc- tive 203, Analytic Standards (or successor directive). ‘‘(b) CONDUCT OF TRAINING.—Training required pursu- ant to the policy required by subsection (a) may be con- ducted in conjunction with other required annual train- ing programs conducted by the element of the intel- ligence community concerned. ‘‘(c) CERTIFICATION OF COMPLETION OF TRAINING.— Each year, each head of an element of the intelligence community shall submit to the congressional intel- ligence committees a certification as to whether all of the analysts of that element have completed the train- ing required pursuant to the policy required by sub- section (a) and if the analysts have not, an explanation of why the training has not been completed. ‘‘(d) REPORTS.— Page 847 TITLE 50—WAR AND NATIONAL DEFENSE § 3365 ‘‘(1) ANNUAL REPORT.—In conjunction with each briefing provided under section 1019(c) of the Intel- ligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 (50 U.S.C. 3364(c)), the Director shall submit to the congressional intelligence committees, the Com- mittee on Appropriations of the Senate, and the Com- mittee on Appropriations of the House of Representa- tives a report on the number and themes of compli- ance incidents reported to intelligence community analytic ombudspersons relating to the standards set forth in Intelligence Community Directive 203 (relat- ing to analytic standards), or successor directive. ‘‘(2) REPORT ON PERFORMANCE EVALUATION.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the head of analysis at each element of the intelligence community that conducts all-source analysis shall submit to the congressional intel- ligence committees, the Committee on Appropria- tions of the Senate, and the Committee on Appropria- tions of the House of Representatives a report de- scribing how compliance with the standards set forth in Intelligence Community Directive 203 (relating to analytic standards), or successor directive, is consid- ered in the performance evaluations and consider- ation for merit pay, bonuses, promotions, and any other personnel actions for analysts within the ele- ment. ‘‘(e) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this section shall be construed to prohibit the Director from pro- viding training described in this section as a service of common concern. ‘‘(f) SUNSET.—This section shall cease to be effective on the date that is 5 years after the date of the enact- ment of this Act [Dec. 23, 2022].’’ [For definitions of ‘‘intelligence community’’ and ‘‘congressional intelligence committees’’ as used in sec- tion 6312 of Pub. L. 117–263, set out above, see section 6002 of Pub. L. 117–263, set out as a note under section 3003 of this title.] SAFEGUARD OF OBJECTIVITY IN INTELLIGENCE ANALYSIS Pub. L. 108–458, title I, § 1020, Dec. 17, 2004, 118 Stat. 3672, provided that: ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the effective date of this Act [probably means the effective date of title I of Pub. L. 108–458, see Effective Date of 2004 Amendment; Transition Provisions note set out under section 3001 of this title], the Director of Na- tional Intelligence shall identify an individual within the Office of the Director of National Intelligence who shall be available to analysts within the Office of the Director of National Intelligence to counsel, conduct arbitration, offer recommendations, and, as appro- priate, initiate inquiries into real or perceived prob- lems of analytic tradecraft or politicization, biased re- porting, or lack of objectivity in intelligence analysis. ‘‘(b) REPORT.—Not later than 270 days after the effec- tive date of this Act, the Director of National Intel- ligence shall provide a report to the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representa- tives on the implementation of subsection (a).’’ § 3365. Foreign intelligence information (1) In general Notwithstanding any other provision of law, it shall be lawful for foreign intelligence or coun- terintelligence (as defined in section 3003 of this title) or foreign intelligence information ob- tained as part of a criminal investigation to be disclosed to any Federal law enforcement, intel- ligence, protective, immigration, national de- fense, or national security official in order to as- sist the official receiving that information in the performance of his official duties. Any Fed- eral official who receives information pursuant to this provision may use that information only as necessary in the conduct of that person’s offi- cial duties subject to any limitations on the un- authorized disclosure of such information. Con- sistent with the responsibility of the Director of Central Intelligence to protect intelligence sources and methods, and the responsibility of the Attorney General to protect sensitive law enforcement information, it shall be lawful for information revealing a threat of actual or po- tential attack or other grave hostile acts of a foreign power or an agent of a foreign power, do- mestic or international sabotage, domestic or international terrorism, or clandestine intel- ligence gathering activities by an intelligence service or network of a foreign power or by an agent of a foreign power, within the United States or elsewhere, obtained as part of a crimi- nal investigation to be disclosed to any appro- priate Federal, State, local, or foreign govern- ment official for the purpose of preventing or re- sponding to such a threat. Any official who re- ceives information pursuant to this provision may use that information only as necessary in the conduct of that person’s official duties sub- ject to any limitations on the unauthorized dis- closure of such information, and any State, local, or foreign official who receives informa- tion pursuant to this provision may use that in- formation only consistent with such guidelines as the Attorney General and Director of Central Intelligence shall jointly issue. (2) Definition In this section, the term ‘‘foreign intelligence information’’ means— (A) information, whether or not concerning a United States person, that relates to the ability of the United States to protect against— (i) actual or potential attack or other grave hostile acts of a foreign power or an agent of a foreign power; (ii) sabotage or international terrorism by a foreign power or an agent of a foreign power; or (iii) clandestine intelligence activities by an intelligence service or network of a for- eign power or by an agent of a foreign power; or (B) information, whether or not concerning a United States person, with respect to a for- eign power or foreign territory that relates to— (i) the national defense or the security of the United States; or (ii) the conduct of the foreign affairs of the United States. (Pub. L. 107–56, title II, § 203(d), Oct. 26, 2001, 115 Stat. 281; Pub. L. 107–296, title VIII, § 897(a), Nov. 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 2257; Pub. L. 117–347, title III, § 323(a)(1)(A), Jan. 5, 2023, 136 Stat. 6206.) Editorial Notes CODIFICATION Section was formerly classified to section 403–5d of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renum- bering as this section. AMENDMENTS 2023—Par. (1). Pub. L. 117–347, § 323(a)(1)(A), repealed Pub. L. 107–296, § 897(a). See 2002 Amendment note below.

Cross-references

Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

50 U.S.C. § 3364 — Assignment of responsibilities relating to analytic integrity

**(a) Assignment of responsibilities** For purposes of carrying out [section 3024(g) of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title50-section3024/g&num=0&edition=prelim), the Director of National Intelligence shall, not later than 180 days after December 17, 2004, assign an individual or entity to be responsible for ensuring that finished intelligence products produced by any element or elements of the intelligence community are timely, objective, independent of political considerations, based upon all sources of available intelligence, and employ the standards of proper analytic tradecraft. **(b) Responsibilities** (1) The individual or entity assigned responsibility under subsection (a)— (A) may be responsible for general oversight and management of analysis and production, but may not be directly responsible for, or involved in, the specific production of any finished intelligence product; (B) shall perform, on a regular basis, detailed reviews of finished intelligence product or other analytic products by an element or elements of the intelligence community covering a particular topic or subject matter; (C) shall be responsible for identifying on an annual basis functional or topical areas of analysis for specific review under subparagraph (B); and (D) upon completion of any review under subparagraph (B), may draft lessons learned, identify best practices, or make recommendations for improvement to the analytic tradecraft employed in the production of the reviewed product or products. (2) Each review under paragraph (1)(B) should— (A) include whether the product or products concerned were based on all sources of available intelligence, properly describe the quality and reliability of underlying sources, properly c

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 50 U.S.C. § 3364

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.