Arkansas Legal Resource Navigator

22 U.S.C. § 4866 — Security training for personnel assigned

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

22 U.S.C. § 4866 — Security training for personnel assigned

Page 1635 TITLE 22—FOREIGN RELATIONS AND INTERCOURSE § 4867 ment or agency to the extent that the Secretary of State determines that such department or agency has not provided to the Department of State the full amount of funding required under paragraph (1), not- withstanding any authorization and appropriation of relevant funds by Congress. ‘‘(3) EXCLUSION.—For purposes of this subsection ‘agency’ does not include the Marine Security Guard.’’ OBLIGATIONS AND EXPENDITURES Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, § 1000(a)(7) [div. A, title VI, § 605], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1536, 1501A–453, as amended by Pub. L. 112–74, div. I, title VII, § 7034(n), Dec. 23, 2011, 125 Stat. 1217, provided that: ‘‘(a) REPORT AND PRIORITY OF OBLIGATIONS.— ‘‘(1) REPORT.—Not later than February 1 of the year 2000 and each of the four subsequent years, the Sec- retary of State shall submit a classified report to the appropriate congressional committees identifying each diplomatic facility or each diplomatic or con- sular post composed of such facilities that is a pri- ority for replacement or for any major security en- hancement because of its vulnerability to terrorist attack (by reason of the terrorist threat and the cur- rent condition of the facility). The report shall list such facilities in groups of 20. The groups shall be ranked in order from most vulnerable to least vulner- able to such an attack. ‘‘(2) PRIORITY ON USE OF FUNDS.— ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in subpara- graph (B), funds authorized to be appropriated by section 604 [set out as a note above] for a particular project may be used only for those facilities which are listed in the first four groups described in para- graph (1). ‘‘(B) EXCEPTION.—Funds authorized to be made available by section 604 may on

Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 22 U.S.C. § 4866

Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.

Original supplied file — preserved unchanged

Download original Markdown file

File SHA-256: 08c100956bfd0b234791f37faeae2252449189f9af4a428f465d124feecaff85. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.

Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.

Open the recorded source website ↗

Record provenance

Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:usc2024-1a74f3cef495606403e26903
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code-2024/title-22/section-4866-security-training-for-personnel-assigned--a7f94715df.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: 56c9981303171be32abf89e740e01697c0ee43b0ea48ee75ddcb68adcdb94487

Source location: USCODE-2024-title22-chap58-subchapIV-sec4866.pdf

Stored source content

Page 1635 TITLE 22—FOREIGN RELATIONS AND INTERCOURSE § 4867 ment or agency to the extent that the Secretary of State determines that such department or agency has not provided to the Department of State the full amount of funding required under paragraph (1), not- withstanding any authorization and appropriation of relevant funds by Congress. ‘‘(3) EXCLUSION.—For purposes of this subsection ‘agency’ does not include the Marine Security Guard.’’ OBLIGATIONS AND EXPENDITURES Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, § 1000(a)(7) [div. A, title VI, § 605], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1536, 1501A–453, as amended by Pub. L. 112–74, div. I, title VII, § 7034(n), Dec. 23, 2011, 125 Stat. 1217, provided that: ‘‘(a) REPORT AND PRIORITY OF OBLIGATIONS.— ‘‘(1) REPORT.—Not later than February 1 of the year 2000 and each of the four subsequent years, the Sec- retary of State shall submit a classified report to the appropriate congressional committees identifying each diplomatic facility or each diplomatic or con- sular post composed of such facilities that is a pri- ority for replacement or for any major security en- hancement because of its vulnerability to terrorist attack (by reason of the terrorist threat and the cur- rent condition of the facility). The report shall list such facilities in groups of 20. The groups shall be ranked in order from most vulnerable to least vulner- able to such an attack. ‘‘(2) PRIORITY ON USE OF FUNDS.— ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in subpara- graph (B), funds authorized to be appropriated by section 604 [set out as a note above] for a particular project may be used only for those facilities which are listed in the first four groups described in para- graph (1). ‘‘(B) EXCEPTION.—Funds authorized to be made available by section 604 may only be used for facili- ties which are not in the first 4 groups described in paragraph (1), if the Congress authorizes or appro- priates funds for such a diplomatic facility or the Secretary of State notifies the appropriate congres- sional committees that such funds will be used for a facility in accordance with the procedures appli- cable to a reprogramming of funds under section 34(a) of the State Department Basic Authorities Act of 1956 (22 U.S.C. 2706(a)). ‘‘(b) PROHIBITION ON TRANSFER OF FUNDS.—None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by section 604 may be transferred to any other account.’’ DEFINITIONS For definitions of the terms ‘‘Secretary’’ and ‘‘appro- priate congressional committees’’ used in this section and in section 1000(a)(7) [div. A, title VI, § 605] of Pub. L. 106–113, set out as a note above, see section 1000(a)(7) [§ 3] of Pub. L. 106–113, set out as a note under section 2651 of this title. Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, § 1000(a)(7) [div. A, title VI, § 603], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1536, 1501A–452, as amended by Pub. L. 117–263, div. I, title XCIII, § 9301(d), Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 3880, provided that: ‘‘In this title [enact- ing this section, amending section 4831 of this title, and enacting provisions set out as notes above], the terms ‘United States diplomatic facility’ and ‘diplomatic fa- cility’ mean any chancery, consulate, or other office that— ‘‘(1) is considered by the Secretary of State to be diplomatic or consular premises, consistent with the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, done at Vienna April 18, 1961, and the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations, done at Vienna April 24, 1963, and was notified to the host government as such; or ‘‘(2) is otherwise subject to a publicly available bi- lateral agreement with the host government (con- tained in the records of the United States Depart- ment of State) that recognizes the official status of the United States Government personnel present at the facility.’’ Executive Documents DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY Memorandum of President of the United States, July 17, 2000, 65 F.R. 45511, provided: Memorandum for the Secretary of Defense By the authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United States of America, I hereby del- egate to the Secretary of Defense the responsibility of the President, under section 606 of the Foreign Rela- tions Authorization Act for Fiscal Years 2000 and 2001 (Public Law 106–113) [22 U.S.C. 4865], to submit the re- quired report to the Congress. You are hereby authorized and directed to publish this delegation in the Federal Register. WILLIAM J. CLINTON. § 4866. Security training for personnel assigned to a high risk, high threat post (a) In general Individuals assigned permanently to or who are in long-term temporary duty status as des- ignated by the Secretary of State at a high risk, high threat post shall receive security training described in subsection (b) on a mandatory basis in order to prepare such individuals for living and working at such posts. (b) Security training described Security training referred to in subsection (a)— (1) is training to improve basic knowledge and skills; and (2) may include— (A) an ability to recognize, avoid, and re- spond to potential terrorist situations, in- cluding a complex attack; (B) conducting surveillance detection; (C) providing emergency medical care; (D) ability to detect the presence of impro- vised explosive devices; (E) minimal firearms familiarization; and (F) defensive driving maneuvers. (c) Effective date The requirements of this section shall take ef- fect upon December 16, 2016. (d) Definitions In this section and section 4867 of this title: (1) Complex attack The term ‘‘complex attack’’ has the meaning given such term by the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, as follows: ‘‘An attack con- ducted by multiple hostile elements which em- ploy at least two distinct classes of weapon systems (i.e., indirect fire and direct fire, im- provised explosive devices, and surface to air fire).’’. (2) High risk, high threat post The term ‘‘high risk, high threat post’’ has the meaning given such term in section 4803 of this title. (Pub. L. 99–399, title IV, § 416, as added Pub. L. 114–323, title I, § 121(a), Dec. 16, 2016, 130 Stat. 1913.) § 4867. Security management training for offi- cials assigned to a high risk, high threat post (a) In general Officials described in subsection (c) who are assigned to a high risk, high threat post shall

Cross-references

Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

22 U.S.C. § 2706 — Reprograming of funds; notice requirements

**(a) In general** Unless the Committee on International Relations and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Foreign Relations and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate are notified fifteen days in advance of the proposed reprograming, funds appropriated for the Department of State shall not be available for obligation or expenditure through any reprograming of funds— (1) which creates new programs; (2) which eliminates a program, project, or activity; (3) which increases funds or personnel by any means for any project or activity for which funds have been denied or restricted by the Congress; (4) which relocates an office or employees; (5) which reorganizes offices, programs, or activities; (6) which involves contracting out functions which had been performed by Federal employees; or (7) which involves a reprograming in excess of $1,000,000 or 10 per centum, whichever is less, and which (A) augments existing programs, projects, or activities, (B) reduces by 10 per centum or more the funding for any existing program, project, activity, or personnel approved by the Congress, or (C) results from any general savings from a reduction in personnel which would result in a change in existing programs, activities, or projects approved by the Congress. **(b) Final 15 days in which funds available** Funds appropriated for the Department of State may not be available for obligation or expenditure through any reprogramming described in subsection (a) during the period which is the last 15 days in which such funds are available unless notice of such reprogramming is made before such period. **(c) Waiver** The Secretary of State may waive the notification requirement of subsection (a), if the Secretary determines that fa

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 22 U.S.C. § 2706

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. The source passage cites 22 U.S.C. § 2706. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

22 U.S.C. § 2706 — Reprograming of funds; notice require-

Page 1137 TITLE 22—FOREIGN RELATIONS AND INTERCOURSE § 2706a to repeal by Pub. L. 102–138, title I, § 111(1), Oct. 28, 1991, 105 Stat. 654. AMENDMENTS 1998—Par. (2). Pub. L. 105–277 inserted at end ‘‘For purposes of this paragraph, the term ‘consular officer’ includes any United States citizen employee of the De- partment of State who is designated by the Secretary of State to adjudicate nationality abroad pursuant to such regulations as the Secretary may prescribe.’’ Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries RECORD OF PLACE OF BIRTH FOR TAIWANESE- AMERICANS Pub. L. 103–236, title I, § 132, Apr. 30, 1994, 108 Stat. 395, as amended by Pub. L. 103–415, § 1(r), Oct. 25, 1994, 108 Stat. 4302, provided that: ‘‘For purposes of the registra- tion of birth or certification of nationality or issuance of a passport of a United States citizen born in Taiwan, the Secretary of State shall permit the place of birth to be recorded as Taiwan.’’ § 2706. Reprograming of funds; notice require- ments (a) In general Unless the Committee on International Rela- tions and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives and the Com- mittee on Foreign Relations and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate are notified fif- teen days in advance of the proposed repro- graming, funds appropriated for the Department of State shall not be available for obligation or expenditure through any reprograming of funds— (1) which creates new programs; (2) which eliminates a program, project, or activity; (3) which increases funds or personnel by any means for any project or activity for which funds have been denied or restricted by the Congress; (4) which relocates an office or employees; (5) which reorganizes offices, programs, or activities; (6) which

Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 22 U.S.C. § 2706

Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. The source passage cites 22 U.S.C. § 2706. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

22 U.S.C. § 4865 — Security requirements for United States diplomatic facilities

**(a) In general** The following security requirements shall apply with respect to United States diplomatic facilities and specified personnel: (1) **Threat assessment** (A) *Emergency Action Plan* — The Emergency Action Plan (EAP) of each United States mission shall address a range of threats, including that of large explosive attacks from vehicles and from complex attacks (as such term is defined in [section 4866 of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title22-section4866&num=0&edition=prelim)), and the safety of employees during such an explosive attack or such a complex attack. Such plan shall be reviewed and updated annually. (B) *Security Environment Threat List* — The Security Environment Threat List shall contain a section that addresses potential acts of international terrorism against United States diplomatic facilities based on threat identification criteria that emphasize the threat of transnational terrorism and include the local security environment, host government support, and other relevant factors such as cultural realities. Such plan shall be reviewed and updated every six months. (2) **Site selection** (A) *In general* — In selecting a site for any new United States diplomatic facility abroad in a location that has certain minimum ratings under the Security Environment Threat List as determined by the Secretary in his or her discretion, the Secretary shall ensure that all United States Government personnel at the post (except those under the command of an area military commander, personnel of the Peace Corps, and personnel of any other type or category of facility that the Secretary may identify) will be located on the site. (B) *Waiver authority* (i) *In general* — Subject to clause (ii), the Se

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 22 U.S.C. § 4865

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. The source passage cites 22 U.S.C. § 4865. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

22 U.S.C. § 4865 — Security requirements for United States

Page 1629 TITLE 22—FOREIGN RELATIONS AND INTERCOURSE § 4865 1998—Subsec. (c)(3). Pub. L. 105–277, § 2210(1), amended par. (3) generally. Prior to amendment, par. (3) read as follows: ‘‘in evaluating and scoring proposals for such contracts, award not less than 60 percent of the total points on the basis of technical factors and subfac- tors;’’. Subsec. (c)(5). Pub. L. 105–277, § 2210(2), inserted ‘‘and’’ at end. Subsec. (c)(6). Pub. L. 105–277, § 2210(3), substituted pe- riod for ‘‘; and’’ at end. Subsec. (c)(7). Pub. L. 105–277, § 2210(4), struck out par. (7) which read as follows: ‘‘give preference to United States persons and qualified United States joint ven- ture persons where such persons are price competitive to the non-United States persons bidding on the con- tract, are properly licensed by the host government, and are otherwise qualified to carry out all the terms of the contract.’’ 1994—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 103–236, § 141(1), added pars. (2) to (5), redesignated former pars. (2) and (3) as (6) and (7), respectively, and in par. (6) struck out ‘‘due to their distance from the post’’ after ‘‘evaluation process’’. Subsec. (d)(1)(D). Pub. L. 103–236, § 141(2)(A), sub- stituted ‘‘or’’ for ‘‘and’’. Subsec. (d)(4). Pub. L. 103–236, § 141(2)(B)–(D), added par. (4). Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries STRENGTHENING OVERSIGHT Pub. L. 115–31, div. J, title VII, § 7004(i), May 5, 2017, 131 Stat. 618, provided that: ‘‘Funds appropriated by this Act [div. J of Pub. L. 115–31, 131 Stat. 589, see Ta- bles for classification] and prior Acts making appro- priations for the Department of State, foreign oper- ations, and related programs under the heading ‘Diplo- matic and Consular Programs’ for Worldwide Security Protection shall be made available t

Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 22 U.S.C. § 4865

Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. The source passage cites 22 U.S.C. § 4865. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

22 U.S.C. § 4866 — Security training for personnel assigned to a high risk, high threat post

**(a) In general** Individuals assigned permanently to or who are in long-term temporary duty status as designated by the Secretary of State at a high risk, high threat post shall receive security training described in subsection (b) on a mandatory basis in order to prepare such individuals for living and working at such posts. **(b) Security training described** Security training referred to in subsection (a)— (1) is training to improve basic knowledge and skills; and (2) may include— (A) an ability to recognize, avoid, and respond to potential terrorist situations, including a complex attack; (B) conducting surveillance detection; (C) providing emergency medical care; (D) ability to detect the presence of improvised explosive devices; (E) minimal firearms familiarization; and (F) defensive driving maneuvers. **(c) Effective date** The requirements of this section shall take effect upon December 16, 2016. **(d) Definitions** In this section and [section 4867 of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title22-section4867&num=0&edition=prelim): (1) **Complex attack** — The term “complex attack” has the meaning given such term by the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, as follows: “An attack conducted by multiple hostile elements which employ at least two distinct classes of weapon systems (i.e., indirect fire and direct fire, improvised explosive devices, and surface to air fire).”. (2) **High risk, high threat post** — The term “high risk, high threat post” has the meaning given such term in [section 4803 of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title22-section4803&num=0&edition=prelim).

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 22 U.S.C. § 4866

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.