Browse Arkansas Code titles and sections
28 U.S.C. § 255 — Three-judge trials
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 104
TITLE 28—JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE
§ 254
This section contains a part of section 296 of title 28,
U.S.C., 1940 ed. Other provisions of such section are in-
corporated in sections 251, 252, 254, 456, 1581, 2071, 2639,
and 2640 of this title.
Provision respecting recommendations for appoint-
ment, promotions, or otherwise affecting such clerical
force, was omitted as unnecessary in view of section 871
of this title.
The second paragraph is partly new and conforms
with similar provisions of section 136(e) of this title, re-
lating to the chief judges of district courts.
The term ‘‘chief judge’’ was substituted for ‘‘pre-
siding judge.’’ (See Reviser’s Note under section 136 of
this title.)
Changes were made in phraseology and arrangement.
Editorial Notes
AMENDMENTS
1996—Pub. L. 104–317 struck out ‘‘; precedence of
judges’’ after ‘‘chief judge’’ in section catchline and
struck out subsecs. (d) and (e) which read as follows:
‘‘(d) Whenever the chief judge is unable to perform
the duties of his office or the office is vacant, his pow-
ers and duties shall devolve upon the judge next in
precedence who is able to act, until such disability is
removed or another chief judge is appointed and duly
qualified.
‘‘(e) The chief judge shall have precedence and shall
preside at any session which he attends. Other judges
shall have precedence and shall preside according to
the seniority of their commissions. Judges whose com-
missions bear the same date shall have precedence ac-
cording to seniority in age.’’
1980—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 96–417 redesignated the Cus-
toms Court as the Court of International Trade.
1970—Pub. L. 91–271 reorganized existing provisions
into lettered subsecs. (a) to (e) and made minor changes
in phraseology.
1959—Pub. L.
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 28 U.S.C. § 255
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.
Original supplied file — preserved unchanged
Download original Markdown file
File SHA-256: 2099945c5f697f331d05896df2bc96a5d95bccce1923e8e404b9584391e4e09f. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.
Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.
Open the recorded source website ↗
Record provenance
Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:usc2024-11b0d424c43327d7b1c6c6c5
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code-2024/title-28/section-255-three-judge-trials--498b22647d.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: 98eb68d0a279c54caf7174df1604291e5699e362bac6e399a68fc2fd33eebf2b
Source location: USCODE-2024-title28-partI-chap11-sec255.pdf
Stored source content
Page 104
TITLE 28—JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE
§ 254
This section contains a part of section 296 of title 28,
U.S.C., 1940 ed. Other provisions of such section are in-
corporated in sections 251, 252, 254, 456, 1581, 2071, 2639,
and 2640 of this title.
Provision respecting recommendations for appoint-
ment, promotions, or otherwise affecting such clerical
force, was omitted as unnecessary in view of section 871
of this title.
The second paragraph is partly new and conforms
with similar provisions of section 136(e) of this title, re-
lating to the chief judges of district courts.
The term ‘‘chief judge’’ was substituted for ‘‘pre-
siding judge.’’ (See Reviser’s Note under section 136 of
this title.)
Changes were made in phraseology and arrangement.
Editorial Notes
AMENDMENTS
1996—Pub. L. 104–317 struck out ‘‘; precedence of
judges’’ after ‘‘chief judge’’ in section catchline and
struck out subsecs. (d) and (e) which read as follows:
‘‘(d) Whenever the chief judge is unable to perform
the duties of his office or the office is vacant, his pow-
ers and duties shall devolve upon the judge next in
precedence who is able to act, until such disability is
removed or another chief judge is appointed and duly
qualified.
‘‘(e) The chief judge shall have precedence and shall
preside at any session which he attends. Other judges
shall have precedence and shall preside according to
the seniority of their commissions. Judges whose com-
missions bear the same date shall have precedence ac-
cording to seniority in age.’’
1980—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 96–417 redesignated the Cus-
toms Court as the Court of International Trade.
1970—Pub. L. 91–271 reorganized existing provisions
into lettered subsecs. (a) to (e) and made minor changes
in phraseology.
1959—Pub. L. 86–243 required the chief judge to super-
vise the fiscal affairs and clerical force of the court,
with the approval of the court.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1980 AMENDMENT
Amendment by Pub. L. 96–417 effective Nov. 1, 1980,
and applicable with respect to civil actions pending on
or commenced on or after such date, see section 701(a)
of Pub. L. 96–417, set out as a note under section 251 of
this title.
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1970 AMENDMENT
Amendment by Pub. L. 91–271 effective Oct. 1, 1970,
see section 122 of Pub. L. 91–271, set out as a note under
section 256 of this title.
SAVINGS PROVISION
Amendment by Pub. L. 86–243 not to deprive Customs
Court [now Court of International Trade] officers or
employees of any rights, privileges, or civil service sta-
tus, see section 4 of Pub. L. 86–243, set out as a note
under section 871 of this title.
§ 254. Single-judge trials
Except as otherwise provided in section 255 of
this title, the judicial power of the Court of
International Trade with respect to any action,
suit or proceeding shall be exercised by a single
judge, who may preside alone and hold a regular
or special session of court at the same time
other sessions are held by other judges.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 900; May 24, 1949,
ch. 139, § 66, 63 Stat. 99; Pub. L. 91–271, title I,
§ 106, June 2, 1970, 84 Stat. 277; Pub. L. 96–417,
title V, § 501(4), Oct. 10, 1980, 94 Stat. 1742.)
HISTORICAL AND REVISION NOTES
1948 ACT
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., § 296 (Mar. 3, 1911,
ch. 231, 187(a), as added Oct. 10, 1940, ch. 843, § 1, 54 Stat.
1101).
This section contains a part of section 296 of title 28,
U.S.C., 1940 ed. Other provisions of such section are in-
corporated in sections 251, 252, 253, 456, 1581, 2071, 2639,
and 2640 of this title.
Words ‘‘when in the opinion of such division or judge
the ends of justice so require,’’ which followed the
phrase ‘‘grant a rehearing or retrial,’’ were omitted as
surplusage.
The term ‘‘chief judge’’ was substituted for ‘‘pre-
siding judge.’’ (See reviser’s note under section 136 of
this title.)
The phrase ‘‘petitions for remission of additional du-
ties’’ was added to the first paragraph at the suggestion
of the court to conform to existing practice.
Reappraisement appeals are heard by a single judge
and reviewed by a division. (See sections 2631 and 2636
of this title.)
The provision of section 296 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940
ed., that the presiding judge shall designate one of the
three judges of a division to preside over such division
was omitted as in conflict with section 253 of this title
(also taken from section 296 of title 28 U.S.C., 1940 ed.),
which provides that judges shall preside according to
the seniority of their commissions. The latter provision
is in accord with present practice.
Changes were made in arrangement and phraseology.
1949 ACT
This amendment clarifies section 254 of title 28,
U.S.C., by restoring language of the original law.
Editorial Notes
PRIOR PROVISIONS
Provisions similar to those relating to the assign-
ment of judges to hear and determine cases, and provi-
sions similar to those authorizing the chief judge to
designate judges to hear and determine cases within
the jurisdiction of the United States, formerly con-
tained in this section, are covered by sections 255 and
256 of this title, respectively.
AMENDMENTS
1980—Pub. L. 96–417 redesignated the Customs Court
as the Court of International Trade.
1970—Pub. L. 91–271 substituted in section catchline
‘‘Single-judge trials’’ for ‘‘Divisions; powers and assign-
ments’’ and substituted provisions in text requiring the
judicial power of the Customs Court with respect to
any action, suit, or proceeding to be exercised by a sin-
gle judge, for provisions setting forth the powers of the
chief judge of the Customs Court with respect to the or-
ganization of such Court into divisions, and the assign-
ment of judges to hear and determine pending cases.
1949—Act May 24, 1949, inserted ‘‘to hear or’’ before
‘‘to hear and determine’’ in third par.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1980 AMENDMENT
Amendment by Pub. L. 96–417 effective Nov. 1, 1980,
and applicable with respect to civil actions pending on
or commenced on or after such date, see section 701(a)
of Pub. L. 96–417, set out as a note under section 251 of
this title.
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1970 AMENDMENT
Amendment by Pub. L. 91–271 effective Oct. 1, 1970,
see section 122 of Pub. L. 91–271, set out as a note under
section 256 of this title.
§ 255. Three-judge trials
(a) Upon application of any party to a civil ac-
tion, or upon his own initiative, the chief judge
Page 105
TITLE 28—JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE
§ 257
of the Court of International Trade shall des-
ignate any three judges of the court to hear and
determine any civil action which the chief judge
finds: (1) raises an issue of the constitutionality
of an Act of Congress, a proclamation of the
President or an Executive order; or (2) has broad
or significant implications in the administra-
tion or interpretation of the customs laws.
(b) A majority of the three judges designated
may hear and determine the civil action and all
questions pending therein.
(Added Pub. L. 91–271, title I, § 108, June 2, 1970,
84 Stat. 277; amended Pub. L. 96–417, title V,
§ 501(5), Oct. 10, 1980, 94 Stat. 1742.)
Editorial Notes
PRIOR PROVISIONS
A prior section 255 was renumbered section 257 of this
title.
AMENDMENTS
1980—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 96–417 redesignated the Cus-
toms Court as the Court of International Trade.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1980 AMENDMENT
Amendment by Pub. L. 96–417 effective Nov. 1, 1980,
and applicable with respect to civil actions pending on
or commenced on or after such date, see section 701(a)
of Pub. L. 96–417, set out as a note under section 251 of
this title.
EFFECTIVE DATE
Section effective Oct. 1, 1970, see section 122 of Pub.
L. 91–271, set out as a note under section 256 of this
title.
§ 256. Trials at ports other than New York
(a) The chief judge may designate any judge or
judges of the court to proceed, together with
necessary assistants, to any port or to any place
within the jurisdiction of the United States to
preside at a trial or hearing at the port or place.
(b) Upon application of a party or upon his
own initiative, and upon a showing that the in-
terests of economy, efficiency, and justice will
be served, the chief judge may issue an order au-
thorizing a judge of the court to preside in an
evidentiary hearing in a foreign country whose
laws do not prohibit such a hearing: Provided,
however, That an interlocutory appeal may be
taken from such an order pursuant to the provi-
sions of section 1292(d)(1) of this title, and the
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal
Circuit may, in its discretion, consider the ap-
peal.
(Added Pub. L. 91–271, title I, § 109, June 2, 1970,
84 Stat. 277; amended Pub. L. 97–164, title I, § 107,
Apr. 2, 1982, 96 Stat. 28.)
Editorial Notes
AMENDMENTS
1982—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 97–164 substituted ‘‘section
1292(d)(1) of this title, and the United States Court of
Appeals for the Federal Circuit may, in its discretion,
consider the appeal’’ for ‘‘section 1541(b) of this title,
subject to the discretion of the Court of Customs and
Patent Appeals as set forth in that section’’.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1982 AMENDMENT
Amendment by Pub. L. 97–164 effective Oct. 1, 1982,
see section 402 of Pub. L. 97–164, set out as a note under
section 171 of this title.
EFFECTIVE DATE
Pub. L. 91–271, title I, § 122, June 2, 1970, 84 Stat. 281,
provided that:
‘‘(a) This title [see Short Title of 1970 Amendment
note set out under section 1 of this title] shall become
effective on October 1, 1970, and shall thereafter apply
to all actions and proceedings in the Customs Court
and the Court of Customs and Patent Appeals except
those involving merchandise entered before the effec-
tive date for which trial has commenced by such effec-
tive date.
‘‘(b) An appeal for reappraisement timely filed with
the Bureau of Customs before the effective date, but as
to which trial has not commenced by such date, shall
be deemed to have had a summons timely and properly
filed under this title. When the judgment or order of
the United States Customs Court has become final in
this appeal, the papers shall be returned to the appro-
priate customs officer to decide any remaining matters
relating to the entry in accordance with section 500 of
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended [section 1500 of Title
19, Customs Duties]. A protest or summons filed after
final decision on an appeal for reappraisement shall not
include issues which were raised or could have been
raised on the appeal for reappraisement.
‘‘(c) A protest timely filed with the Bureau of Cus-
toms before the effective date of enactment of this Act
[June 2, 1970], which is disallowed before that date, and
as to which trial has not commenced by such date,
shall be deemed to have had a summons timely and
properly filed under this title.
‘‘(d) All other provisions of this Act [see Short Title
notes set out under section 1 of this title and section
1500 of Title 19] shall apply to appeals and disallowed
protests deemed to have had summonses timely and
properly filed under this section.’’
§ 257. Publication of decisions
All decisions of the Court of International
Trade shall be preserved and open to inspection.
The court shall forward copies of each decision
to the Secretary of the Treasury or his designee
and to the appropriate customs officer for the
district in which the case arose. The Secretary
shall publish weekly such decisions as he or the
court may designate and abstracts of all other
decisions.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 900, § 255; renum-
bered § 257 and amended Pub. L. 91–271, title I,
§ 107, June 2, 1970, 84 Stat. 277; Pub. L. 96–417,
title V, § 501(6), Oct. 10, 1980, 94 Stat. 1742.)
HISTORICAL AND REVISION NOTES
Based on section 1519 of title 19, U.S.C., 1940 ed., Cus-
toms Duties (June 17, 1930, ch. 497, title IV, § 519, 46
Stat. 739).
Changes in phraseology were made.
Editorial Notes
AMENDMENTS
1980—Pub. L. 96–417 redesignated the Customs Court
as the Court of International Trade.
1970—Pub. L. 91–271 inserted ‘‘or his designee’’ after
‘‘Secretary of the Treasury,’’ and substituted ‘‘to the
appropriate customs officer’’ for ‘‘the collector’’.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1980 AMENDMENT
Amendment by Pub. L. 96–417 effective Nov. 1, 1980,
and applicable with respect to civil actions pending on
Cross-references
Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a)** Upon application of any party to a civil action, or upon his own initiative, the chief judge of the Court of International Trade shall designate any three judges of the court to hear and determine any civil action which the chief judge finds: (1) raises an issue of the constitutionality of an Act of Congress, a proclamation of the President or an Executive order; or (2) has broad or significant implications in the administration or interpretation of the customs laws.
**(b)** A majority of the three judges designated may hear and determine the civil action and all questions pending therein.
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 28 U.S.C. § 255
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.