Browse Arkansas Code titles and sections
15 U.S.C. § 1692p — Exception for certain bad check enforce-
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 1643
TITLE 15—COMMERCE AND TRADE
§ 1692p
added by Pub. L. 95–109, set out as a note under section
1692 of this title.
§ 1692o. Exemption for State regulation
The Bureau shall by regulation exempt from
the requirements of this subchapter any class of
debt collection practices within any State if the
Bureau determines that under the law of that
State that class of debt collection practices is
subject to requirements substantially similar to
those imposed by this subchapter, and that
there is adequate provision for enforcement.
(Pub. L. 90–321, title VIII, § 817, as added Pub. L.
95–109, Sept. 20, 1977, 91 Stat. 883; amended Pub.
L. 111–203, title X, § 1089(1), July 21, 2010, 124
Stat. 2092.)
Editorial Notes
AMENDMENTS
2010—Pub. L. 111–203 substituted ‘‘Bureau’’ for ‘‘Com-
mission’’ in two places.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 2010 AMENDMENT
Amendment by Pub. L. 111–203 effective on the des-
ignated transfer date, see section 1100H of Pub. L.
111–203, set out as a note under section 552a of Title 5,
Government Organization and Employees.
EFFECTIVE DATE
Section effective upon the expiration of six months
after Sept. 20, 1977, see section 819 of Pub. L. 90–321, as
added by Pub. L. 95–109, set out as a note under section
1692 of this title.
§ 1692p. Exception for certain bad check enforce-
ment programs operated by private entities
(a) In general
(1) Treatment of certain private entities
Subject to paragraph (2), a private entity
shall be excluded from the definition of a debt
collector, pursuant to the exception provided
in section 1692a(6) of this title, with respect to
the operation by the entity of a program de-
scribed in paragraph (2)(A) under a contract
described in paragraph (2)(B).
(2) Conditions o
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 15 U.S.C. § 1692p
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.
Original supplied file — preserved unchanged
Download original Markdown file
File SHA-256: 448593690e6f04bb02be542e2e311281a6b74992f96cd16de40c31d261d95bd7. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.
Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.
Open the recorded source website ↗
Record provenance
Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:usc2024-10dfbded40109388542a9fdb
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code-2024/title-15/section-1692p-exception-for-certain-bad-check-enforce--e58526e86d.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: 68104546f2599591e6bf75f0564934a6ed6399962382c8231dd2d4cda716238d
Source location: USCODE-2024-title15-chap41-subchapV-sec1692p.pdf
Stored source content
Page 1643
TITLE 15—COMMERCE AND TRADE
§ 1692p
added by Pub. L. 95–109, set out as a note under section
1692 of this title.
§ 1692o. Exemption for State regulation
The Bureau shall by regulation exempt from
the requirements of this subchapter any class of
debt collection practices within any State if the
Bureau determines that under the law of that
State that class of debt collection practices is
subject to requirements substantially similar to
those imposed by this subchapter, and that
there is adequate provision for enforcement.
(Pub. L. 90–321, title VIII, § 817, as added Pub. L.
95–109, Sept. 20, 1977, 91 Stat. 883; amended Pub.
L. 111–203, title X, § 1089(1), July 21, 2010, 124
Stat. 2092.)
Editorial Notes
AMENDMENTS
2010—Pub. L. 111–203 substituted ‘‘Bureau’’ for ‘‘Com-
mission’’ in two places.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 2010 AMENDMENT
Amendment by Pub. L. 111–203 effective on the des-
ignated transfer date, see section 1100H of Pub. L.
111–203, set out as a note under section 552a of Title 5,
Government Organization and Employees.
EFFECTIVE DATE
Section effective upon the expiration of six months
after Sept. 20, 1977, see section 819 of Pub. L. 90–321, as
added by Pub. L. 95–109, set out as a note under section
1692 of this title.
§ 1692p. Exception for certain bad check enforce-
ment programs operated by private entities
(a) In general
(1) Treatment of certain private entities
Subject to paragraph (2), a private entity
shall be excluded from the definition of a debt
collector, pursuant to the exception provided
in section 1692a(6) of this title, with respect to
the operation by the entity of a program de-
scribed in paragraph (2)(A) under a contract
described in paragraph (2)(B).
(2) Conditions of applicability
Paragraph (1) shall apply if—
(A) a State or district attorney estab-
lishes, within the jurisdiction of such State
or district attorney and with respect to al-
leged bad check violations that do not in-
volve a check described in subsection (b), a
pretrial diversion program for alleged bad
check offenders who agree to participate vol-
untarily in such program to avoid criminal
prosecution;
(B) a private entity, that is subject to an
administrative support services contract
with a State or district attorney and oper-
ates under the direction, supervision, and
control of such State or district attorney,
operates the pretrial diversion program de-
scribed in subparagraph (A); and
(C) in the course of performing duties dele-
gated to it by a State or district attorney
under the contract, the private entity re-
ferred to in subparagraph (B)—
(i) complies with the penal laws of the
State;
(ii) conforms with the terms of the con-
tract and directives of the State or district
attorney;
(iii) does not exercise independent pros-
ecutorial discretion;
(iv) contacts any alleged offender re-
ferred to in subparagraph (A) for purposes
of participating in a program referred to in
such paragraph—
(I) only as a result of any determina-
tion by the State or district attorney
that probable cause of a bad check viola-
tion under State penal law exists, and
that contact with the alleged offender
for purposes of participation in the pro-
gram is appropriate; and
(II) the alleged offender has failed to
pay the bad check after demand for pay-
ment, pursuant to State law, is made for
payment of the check amount;
(v) includes as part of an initial written
communication with an alleged offender a
clear and conspicuous statement that—
(I) the alleged offender may dispute
the validity of any alleged bad check
violation;
(II) where the alleged offender knows,
or has reasonable cause to believe, that
the alleged bad check violation is the re-
sult of theft or forgery of the check,
identity theft, or other fraud that is not
the result of the conduct of the alleged
offender, the alleged offender may file a
crime report with the appropriate law
enforcement agency; and
(III) if the alleged offender notifies the
private entity or the district attorney in
writing, not later than 30 days after
being contacted for the first time pursu-
ant to clause (iv), that there is a dispute
pursuant to this subsection, before fur-
ther restitution efforts are pursued, the
district attorney or an employee of the
district attorney authorized to make
such a determination makes a deter-
mination that there is probable cause to
believe that a crime has been com-
mitted; and
(vi) charges only fees in connection with
services under the contract that have been
authorized by the contract with the State
or district attorney.
(b) Certain checks excluded
A check is described in this subsection if the
check involves, or is subsequently found to in-
volve—
(1) a postdated check presented in connec-
tion with a payday loan, or other similar
transaction, where the payee of the check
knew that the issuer had insufficient funds at
the time the check was made, drawn, or deliv-
ered;
(2) a stop payment order where the issuer
acted in good faith and with reasonable cause
in stopping payment on the check;
(3) a check dishonored because of an adjust-
ment to the issuer’s account by the financial
Page 1644
TITLE 15—COMMERCE AND TRADE
§ 1693
1 See References in Text note below.
2 So in original. There are two pars. designated ‘‘(4)’’ and no
par. (3).
institution holding such account without pro-
viding notice to the person at the time the
check was made, drawn, or delivered;
(4) a check for partial payment of a debt
where the payee had previously accepted par-
tial payment for such debt;
(5) a check issued by a person who was not
competent, or was not of legal age, to enter
into a legal contractual obligation at the time
the check was made, drawn, or delivered; or
(6) a check issued to pay an obligation aris-
ing from a transaction that was illegal in the
jurisdiction of the State or district attorney
at the time the check was made, drawn, or de-
livered.
(c) Definitions
For purposes of this section, the following
definitions shall apply:
(1) State or district attorney
The term ‘‘State or district attorney’’ means
the chief elected or appointed prosecuting at-
torney in a district, county (as defined in sec-
tion 2 of title 1), municipality, or comparable
jurisdiction, including State attorneys general
who act as chief elected or appointed pros-
ecuting attorneys in a district, county (as so
defined), municipality or comparable jurisdic-
tion, who may be referred to by a variety of ti-
tles such as district attorneys, prosecuting at-
torneys, commonwealth’s attorneys, solici-
tors, county attorneys, and state’s attorneys,
and who are responsible for the prosecution of
State crimes and violations of jurisdiction-
specific local ordinances.
(2) Check
The term ‘‘check’’ has the same meaning as
in section 5002(6) of title 12.
(3) Bad check violation
The term ‘‘bad check violation’’ means a
violation of the applicable State criminal law
relating to the writing of dishonored checks.
(Pub. L. 90–321, title VIII, § 818, as added Pub. L.
109–351, title VIII, § 801(a)(2), Oct. 13, 2006, 120
Stat. 2004.)
SUBCHAPTER VI—ELECTRONIC FUND
TRANSFERS
§ 1693. Congressional findings and declaration of
purpose
(a) Rights and liabilities undefined
The Congress finds that the use of electronic
systems to transfer funds provides the potential
for substantial benefits to consumers. However,
due to the unique characteristics of such sys-
tems, the application of existing consumer pro-
tection legislation is unclear, leaving the rights
and liabilities of consumers, financial institu-
tions, and intermediaries in electronic fund
transfers undefined.
(b) Purposes
It is the purpose of this subchapter to provide
a basic framework establishing the rights, li-
abilities, and responsibilities of participants in
electronic fund and remittance transfer sys-
tems. The primary objective of this subchapter,
however, is the provision of individual consumer
rights.
(Pub. L. 90–321, title IX, § 902, as added Pub. L.
95–630, title XX, § 2001, Nov. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 3728;
amended Pub. L. 111–203, title X, § 1073(a)(1), July
21, 2010, 124 Stat. 2060.)
Editorial Notes
AMENDMENTS
2010—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 111–203 inserted ‘‘and remit-
tance’’ after ‘‘electronic fund’’.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 2010 AMENDMENT
Amendment by Pub. L. 111–203 effective 1 day after
July 21, 2010, except as otherwise provided, see section
4 of Pub. L. 111–203, set out as an Effective Date note
under section 5301 of Title 12, Banks and Banking.
EFFECTIVE DATE
Pub. L. 90–321, title IX, § 923, formerly § 921, as added
by Pub. L. 95–630, title XX, § 2001, Nov. 10, 1978, 92 Stat.
3741, renumbered § 922, Pub. L. 111–24, title IV, § 401(1),
May 22, 2009, 123 Stat. 1751; renumbered § 923, Pub. L.
111–203, title X, § 1073(a)(3), July 21, 2010, 124 Stat. 2060,
provided that: ‘‘This title [enacting this subchapter]
takes effect upon the expiration of eighteen months
from the date of its enactment [Nov. 10, 1978], except
that sections 909 and 911 [sections 1693g, 1693i of this
title] take effect upon the expiration of ninety days
after the date of enactment.’’
[Pub. L. 111–203, § 1073(a)(3), which directed renum-
bering of section 922 of Pub. L. 90–321 as section 923 ef-
fective 1 day after July 21, 2010, was executed after the
renumbering of section 921 of Pub. L. 90–321 as section
922 by Pub. L. 111–24, § 401(1), effective 15 months after
May 22, 2009, to reflect the probable intent of Congress.]
SHORT TITLE
This subchapter known as the ‘‘Electronic Fund
Transfer Act’’, see Short Title note set out under sec-
tion 1601 of this title.
§ 1693a. Definitions
As used in this subchapter—
(1) the term ‘‘accepted card or other means
of access’’ means a card, code, or other means
of access to a consumer’s account for the pur-
pose of initiating electronic fund transfers
when the person to whom such card or other
means of access was issued has requested and
received or has signed or has used, or author-
ized another to use, such card or other means
of access for the purpose of transferring
money between accounts or obtaining money,
property, labor, or services;
(2) the term ‘‘account’’ means a demand de-
posit, savings deposit, or other asset account
(other than an occasional or incidental credit
balance in an open end credit plan as defined
in section 1602(i) 1 of this title), as described in
regulations of the Bureau, established pri-
marily for personal, family, or household pur-
poses, but such term does not include an ac-
count held by a financial institution pursuant
to a bona fide trust agreement;
(4) 2 the term ‘‘Board’’ means the Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve System;
(4) 2 the term ‘‘Bureau’’ means the Bureau of
Consumer Financial Protection;
Cross-references
Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a) In general**
(1) **Treatment of certain private entities** — Subject to paragraph (2), a private entity shall be excluded from the definition of a debt collector, pursuant to the exception provided in [section 1692a(6) of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title15-section1692a/6&num=0&edition=prelim), with respect to the operation by the entity of a program described in paragraph (2)(A) under a contract described in paragraph (2)(B).
(2) **Conditions of applicability** — Paragraph (1) shall apply if—
(A) a State or district attorney establishes, within the jurisdiction of such State or district attorney and with respect to alleged bad check violations that do not involve a check described in subsection (b), a pretrial diversion program for alleged bad check offenders who agree to participate voluntarily in such program to avoid criminal prosecution;
(B) a private entity, that is subject to an administrative support services contract with a State or district attorney and operates under the direction, supervision, and control of such State or district attorney, operates the pretrial diversion program described in subparagraph (A); and
(C) in the course of performing duties delegated to it by a State or district attorney under the contract, the private entity referred to in subparagraph (B)—
(i) complies with the penal laws of the State;
(ii) conforms with the terms of the contract and directives of the State or district attorney;
(iii) does not exercise independent prosecutorial discretion;
(iv) contacts any alleged offender referred to in subparagraph (A) for purposes of participating in a program referred to in such paragraph—
(I) only as a result of any determination by the State or distr
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 15 U.S.C. § 1692p
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.