Browse Arkansas Code titles and sections
15 U.S.C. § 15a — Suits by United States; amount of recovery;
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 23
TITLE 15—COMMERCE AND TRADE
§ 15c
after July 7, 1955. Section 77 of act Aug. 27, 1894, was re-
pealed
by
Pub.
L.
107–273,
div.
C,
title
IV,
§§ 14102(c)(1)(A), 14103, Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1921, 1922,
effective Nov. 2, 2002, and applicable only with respect
to cases commenced on or after Nov. 2, 2002.
AMENDMENTS
1982—Pub. L. 97–393 designated existing provisions as
subsec. (a), inserted ‘‘Except as provided in subsection
(b),’’, and added subsecs. (b) and (c).
1980—Pub. L. 96–349 inserted provisions respecting
award of prejudgment interest including considerations
for the court in determining whether an award is just
under the circumstances.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1980 AMENDMENT
Pub. L. 96–349, § 4(b), Sept. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 1157, pro-
vided that: ‘‘The amendments made by this section
[amending this section and sections 15a and 15c of this
title] shall apply only with respect to actions com-
menced after the date of the enactment of this Act
[Sept 12, 1980].’’
§ 15a. Suits by United States; amount of recovery;
prejudgment interest
Whenever the United States is hereafter in-
jured in its business or property by reason of
anything forbidden in the antitrust laws it may
sue therefor in the United States district court
for the district in which the defendant resides or
is found or has an agent, without respect to the
amount in controversy, and shall recover three-
fold the damages by it sustained and the cost of
suit. The court may award under this section,
pursuant to a motion by the United States
promptly made, simple interest on actual dam-
ages for the period beginning on the date of
service of the pleading of the United States set-
ting forth a claim under the antitrust laws and
ending
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 15 U.S.C. § 15a
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.
Original supplied file — preserved unchanged
Download original Markdown file
File SHA-256: f7bc8f15ad1874cb501890c51de3f07de1d25beb3af4105c61e076bb7db68706. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.
Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.
Open the recorded source website ↗
Record provenance
Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:usc2024-0ed01e065d9ede7e18ff99d3
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code-2024/title-15/section-15a-suits-by-united-states-amount-of-recovery--5f3762a746.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: 79ec4f769687e6b045545a74b7e9438e5097208def1c83a61d19f5e15c73d3c3
Source location: USCODE-2024-title15-chap1-sec15a.pdf
Stored source content
Page 23
TITLE 15—COMMERCE AND TRADE
§ 15c
after July 7, 1955. Section 77 of act Aug. 27, 1894, was re-
pealed
by
Pub.
L.
107–273,
div.
C,
title
IV,
§§ 14102(c)(1)(A), 14103, Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1921, 1922,
effective Nov. 2, 2002, and applicable only with respect
to cases commenced on or after Nov. 2, 2002.
AMENDMENTS
1982—Pub. L. 97–393 designated existing provisions as
subsec. (a), inserted ‘‘Except as provided in subsection
(b),’’, and added subsecs. (b) and (c).
1980—Pub. L. 96–349 inserted provisions respecting
award of prejudgment interest including considerations
for the court in determining whether an award is just
under the circumstances.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1980 AMENDMENT
Pub. L. 96–349, § 4(b), Sept. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 1157, pro-
vided that: ‘‘The amendments made by this section
[amending this section and sections 15a and 15c of this
title] shall apply only with respect to actions com-
menced after the date of the enactment of this Act
[Sept 12, 1980].’’
§ 15a. Suits by United States; amount of recovery;
prejudgment interest
Whenever the United States is hereafter in-
jured in its business or property by reason of
anything forbidden in the antitrust laws it may
sue therefor in the United States district court
for the district in which the defendant resides or
is found or has an agent, without respect to the
amount in controversy, and shall recover three-
fold the damages by it sustained and the cost of
suit. The court may award under this section,
pursuant to a motion by the United States
promptly made, simple interest on actual dam-
ages for the period beginning on the date of
service of the pleading of the United States set-
ting forth a claim under the antitrust laws and
ending on the date of judgment, or for any
shorter period therein, if the court finds that
the award of such interest for such period is just
in the circumstances. In determining whether
an award of interest under this section for any
period is just in the circumstances, the court
shall consider only—
(1) whether the United States or the oppos-
ing party, or either party’s representative,
made motions or asserted claims or defenses
so lacking in merit as to show that such party
or representative acted intentionally for delay
or otherwise acted in bad faith;
(2) whether, in the course of the action in-
volved, the United States or the opposing
party, or either party’s representative, vio-
lated any applicable rule, statute, or court
order providing for sanctions for dilatory be-
havior or otherwise providing for expeditious
proceedings;
(3) whether the United States or the oppos-
ing party, or either party’s representative, en-
gaged in conduct primarily for the purpose of
delaying the litigation or increasing the cost
thereof; and
(4) whether the award of such interest is nec-
essary to compensate the United States ade-
quately for the injury sustained by the United
States.
(Oct. 15, 1914, ch. 323, § 4A, as added July 7, 1955,
ch. 283, § 1, 69 Stat. 282; amended Pub. L. 96–349,
§ 4(a)(2), Sept. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 1156; Pub. L.
101–588, § 5, Nov. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 2880.)
Editorial Notes
REFERENCES IN TEXT
The antitrust laws, referred to in text, are defined in
section 12 of this title.
AMENDMENTS
1990—Pub. L. 101–588 substituted ‘‘threefold the’’ for
‘‘actual’’.
1980—Pub. L. 96–349 inserted provisions respecting
award of prejudgment interest including considerations
for the court in determining whether an award is just
under the circumstances.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1980 AMENDMENT
Amendment by Pub. L. 96–349 applicable only with re-
spect to actions commenced after Sept. 12, 1980, see sec-
tion 4(b) of Pub. L. 96–349, set out as a note under sec-
tion 15 of this title.
EFFECTIVE DATE
Section effective six months after July 7, 1955, see
note set out under section 15b of this title.
§ 15b. Limitation of actions
Any action to enforce any cause of action
under section 15, 15a, or 15c of this title shall be
forever barred unless commenced within four
years after the cause of action accrued. No cause
of action barred under existing law on the effec-
tive date of this Act shall be revived by this Act.
(Oct. 15, 1914, ch. 323, § 4B, as added July 7, 1955,
ch. 283, § 1, 69 Stat. 283; amended Pub. L. 94–435,
title III, § 302(1), Sept. 30, 1976, 90 Stat. 1396.)
Editorial Notes
REFERENCES IN TEXT
The effective date of this Act, referred to in text,
probably refers to the effective date of act July 7, 1955,
ch. 283, 69 Stat. 282, which was six months after July 7,
1955.
This Act, referred to in text, probably refers to act
July 7, 1955.
AMENDMENTS
1976—Pub. L. 94–435 substituted ‘‘section 15, 15a, or
15c’’ for ‘‘sections 15 or 15a’’.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
EFFECTIVE DATE
Act July 7, 1955, ch. 283, § 4, 69 Stat. 283, provided:
‘‘This Act [enacting this section and section 15a of this
title, amending section 16 of this title, and repealing
provisions set out as a note under section 15 of this
title] shall take effect six months after its enactment
[July 7, 1955].’’
§ 15c. Actions by State attorneys general
(a) Parens patriae; monetary relief; damages;
prejudgment interest
(1) Any attorney general of a State may bring
a civil action in the name of such State, as
parens patriae on behalf of natural persons re-
siding in such State, in any district court of the
United States having jurisdiction of the defend-
ant, to secure monetary relief as provided in
Cross-references
Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Whenever the United States is hereafter injured in its business or property by reason of anything forbidden in the antitrust laws it may sue therefor in the United States district court for the district in which the defendant resides or is found or has an agent, without respect to the amount in controversy, and shall recover threefold the damages by it sustained and the cost of suit. The court may award under this section, pursuant to a motion by the United States promptly made, simple interest on actual damages for the period beginning on the date of service of the pleading of the United States setting forth a claim under the antitrust laws and ending on the date of judgment, or for any shorter period therein, if the court finds that the award of such interest for such period is just in the circumstances. In determining whether an award of interest under this section for any period is just in the circumstances, the court shall consider only—
(1) whether the United States or the opposing party, or either party’s representative, made motions or asserted claims or defenses so lacking in merit as to show that such party or representative acted intentionally for delay or otherwise acted in bad faith;
(2) whether, in the course of the action involved, the United States or the opposing party, or either party’s representative, violated any applicable rule, statute, or court order providing for sanctions for dilatory behavior or otherwise providing for expeditious proceedings;
(3) whether the United States or the opposing party, or either party’s representative, engaged in conduct primarily for the purpose of delaying the litigation or increasing the cost thereof; and
(4) whether the award of such interest is necessary to compensate the United States adequately for the inju
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 15 U.S.C. § 15a
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.