Browse Arkansas Code titles and sections
10 U.S.C. § 950d — Interlocutory appeals by the United
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 870
TITLE 10—ARMED FORCES
§ 950c
graph may be taken only after consideration of
any matters submitted by the accused under
subsection (b) or after the time for submitting
such matters expires, whichever is earlier.
(C) In taking action under this paragraph, the
convening authority may, in the sole discretion
of the convening authority, approve, disapprove,
commute, or suspend the sentence in whole or in
part. The convening authority may not increase
a sentence beyond that which is found by the
military commission.
(4) The convening authority shall serve on the
accused or on defense counsel notice of any ac-
tion taken by the convening authority under
this subsection.
(d) ORDER OF REVISION OR REHEARING.—(1) Sub-
ject to paragraphs (2) and (3), the convening au-
thority of a military commission under this
chapter may, in the sole discretion of the con-
vening authority, order a proceeding in revision
or a rehearing.
(2)(A) Except as provided in subparagraph (B),
a proceeding in revision may be ordered by the
convening authority if—
(i) there is an apparent error or omission in
the record; or
(ii) the record shows improper or incon-
sistent action by the military commission
with respect to the findings or sentence that
can be rectified without material prejudice to
the substantial rights of the accused.
(B) In no case may a proceeding in revision—
(i) reconsider a finding of not guilty of a
specification or a ruling which amounts to a
finding of not guilty;
(ii) reconsider a finding of not guilty of any
charge, unless there has been a finding of
guilty under a specification laid under that
charge, which sufficiently alleges a violation;
or
(iii) increase the severity of the sentence un-
less the sentence prescribed for the offense is
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 10 U.S.C. § 950d
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.
Original supplied file — preserved unchanged
Download original Markdown file
File SHA-256: 88ba48b3ff172475f4db842bb98a91375baa3a471ae5b1bd06fb8cb7a14dbc66. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.
Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.
Open the recorded source website ↗
Record provenance
Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:usc2024-0bb999bb5ad39346d581a53c
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code-2024/title-10/section-950d-interlocutory-appeals-by-the-united--360b34e1f8.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: 072488b7fcd48eee1d15a7b19b97529c6a91e86dbfd4ce319f5306cacd28dbd9
Source location: USCODE-2024-title10-subtitleA-partII-chap47A-subchapVII-sec950d.pdf
Stored source content
Page 870
TITLE 10—ARMED FORCES
§ 950c
graph may be taken only after consideration of
any matters submitted by the accused under
subsection (b) or after the time for submitting
such matters expires, whichever is earlier.
(C) In taking action under this paragraph, the
convening authority may, in the sole discretion
of the convening authority, approve, disapprove,
commute, or suspend the sentence in whole or in
part. The convening authority may not increase
a sentence beyond that which is found by the
military commission.
(4) The convening authority shall serve on the
accused or on defense counsel notice of any ac-
tion taken by the convening authority under
this subsection.
(d) ORDER OF REVISION OR REHEARING.—(1) Sub-
ject to paragraphs (2) and (3), the convening au-
thority of a military commission under this
chapter may, in the sole discretion of the con-
vening authority, order a proceeding in revision
or a rehearing.
(2)(A) Except as provided in subparagraph (B),
a proceeding in revision may be ordered by the
convening authority if—
(i) there is an apparent error or omission in
the record; or
(ii) the record shows improper or incon-
sistent action by the military commission
with respect to the findings or sentence that
can be rectified without material prejudice to
the substantial rights of the accused.
(B) In no case may a proceeding in revision—
(i) reconsider a finding of not guilty of a
specification or a ruling which amounts to a
finding of not guilty;
(ii) reconsider a finding of not guilty of any
charge, unless there has been a finding of
guilty under a specification laid under that
charge, which sufficiently alleges a violation;
or
(iii) increase the severity of the sentence un-
less the sentence prescribed for the offense is
mandatory.
(3) A rehearing may be ordered by the con-
vening authority if the convening authority dis-
approves the findings and sentence and states
the reasons for disapproval of the findings. If the
convening authority disapproves the finding and
sentence and does not order a rehearing, the
convening authority shall dismiss the charges.
A rehearing as to the findings may not be or-
dered by the convening authority when there is
a lack of sufficient evidence in the record to
support the findings. A rehearing as to the sen-
tence may be ordered by the convening author-
ity if the convening authority disapproves the
sentence.
(Added Pub. L. 111–84, div. A, title XVIII, § 1802,
Oct. 28, 2009, 123 Stat. 2599; amended Pub. L.
113–291, div. A, title X, § 1071(f)(10), Dec. 19, 2014,
128 Stat. 3510.)
Editorial Notes
PRIOR PROVISIONS
A prior section 950b, added Pub. L. 109–366, § 3(a)(1),
Oct. 17, 2006, 120 Stat. 2618, related to review by the con-
vening authority, prior to the general amendment of
this chapter by Pub. L. 111–84.
AMENDMENTS
2014—Subsec. (b)(2)(A). Pub. L. 113–291 substituted
‘‘given’’ for ‘‘give’’.
§ 950c. Appellate referral; waiver or withdrawal
of appeal
(a) AUTOMATIC REFERRAL FOR APPELLATE RE-
VIEW.—Except as provided in subsection (b), in
each case in which the final decision of a mili-
tary commission under this chapter (as ap-
proved by the convening authority) includes a
finding of guilty, the convening authority shall
refer the case to the United States Court of
Military Commission Review. Any such referral
shall be made in accordance with procedures
prescribed under regulations of the Secretary.
(b) WAIVER OF RIGHT OF REVIEW.—(1) Except in
a case in which the sentence as approved under
section 950b of this title extends to death, an ac-
cused may file with the convening authority a
statement expressly waiving the right of the ac-
cused to appellate review by the United States
Court of Military Commission Review under sec-
tion 950f of this title of the final decision of the
military commission under this chapter.
(2) A waiver under paragraph (1) shall be
signed by both the accused and a defense coun-
sel.
(3) A waiver under paragraph (1) must be filed,
if at all, within 10 days after notice of the action
is served on the accused or on defense counsel
under section 950b(c)(4) of this title. The con-
vening authority, for good cause, may extend
the period for such filing by not more than 30
days.
(c) WITHDRAWAL OF APPEAL.—Except in a case
in which the sentence as approved under section
950b of this title extends to death, the accused
may withdraw an appeal at any time.
(d) EFFECT
OF
WAIVER
OR
WITHDRAWAL.—A
waiver of the right to appellate review or the
withdrawal of an appeal under this section bars
review under section 950f of this title.
(Added Pub. L. 111–84, div. A, title XVIII, § 1802,
Oct. 28, 2009, 123 Stat. 2600.)
Editorial Notes
PRIOR PROVISIONS
A prior section 950c, added Pub. L. 109–366, § 3(a)(1),
Oct. 17, 2006, 120 Stat. 2620, related to appellate referral
and waiver or withdrawal of appeal, prior to the gen-
eral amendment of this chapter by Pub. L. 111–84.
§ 950d. Interlocutory appeals by the United
States
(a) INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL.—Except as pro-
vided in subsection (b), in a trial by military
commission under this chapter, the United
States may take an interlocutory appeal to the
United States Court of Military Commission Re-
view of any order or ruling of the military
judge—
(1) that terminates proceedings of the mili-
tary commission with respect to a charge or
specification;
(2) that excludes evidence that is substantial
proof of a fact material in the proceeding;
(3) that relates to a matter under subsection
(c) or (d) of section 949d of this title; or
Page 871
TITLE 10—ARMED FORCES
§ 950f
(4) that, with respect to classified informa-
tion—
(A) authorizes the disclosure of such infor-
mation;
(B) imposes sanctions for nondisclosure of
such information; or
(C) refuses a protective order sought by
the United States to prevent the disclosure
of such information.
(b) LIMITATION.—The United States may not
appeal under subsection (a) an order or ruling
that is, or amounts to, a finding of not guilty by
the military commission with respect to a
charge or specification.
(c) SCOPE OF APPEAL RIGHT WITH RESPECT TO
CLASSIFIED
INFORMATION.—The United States
has the right to appeal under paragraph (4) of
subsection (a) whenever the military judge en-
ters an order or ruling that would require the
disclosure of classified information, without re-
gard to whether the order or ruling appealed
from was entered under this chapter, another
provision of law, a rule, or otherwise. Any such
appeal may embrace any preceding order, ruling,
or reasoning constituting the basis of the order
or ruling that would authorize such disclosure.
(d) TIMING AND ACTION ON INTERLOCUTORY AP-
PEALS RELATING TO CLASSIFIED INFORMATION.—
(1) APPEAL
TO
BE
EXPEDITED.—An appeal
taken pursuant to paragraph (4) of subsection
(a) shall be expedited by the United States
Court of Military Commission Review.
(2) APPEALS BEFORE TRIAL.—If such an appeal
is taken before trial, the appeal shall be taken
within 10 days after the order or ruling from
which the appeal is made and the trial shall
not commence until the appeal is decided.
(3) APPEALS DURING TRIAL.—If such an appeal
is taken during trial, the military judge shall
adjourn the trial until the appeal is decided,
and the court of appeals—
(A) shall hear argument on such appeal
within 4 days of the adjournment of the trial
(excluding weekends and holidays);
(B) may dispense with written briefs other
than the supporting materials previously
submitted to the military judge;
(C) shall render its decision within four
days of argument on appeal (excluding week-
ends and holidays); and
(D) may dispense with the issuance of a
written opinion in rendering its decision.
(e) NOTICE AND TIMING OF OTHER APPEALS.—
The United States shall take an appeal of an
order or ruling under subsection (a), other than
an appeal under paragraph (4) of that subsection,
by filing a notice of appeal with the military
judge within 5 days after the date of the order or
ruling.
(f) METHOD OF APPEAL.—An appeal under this
section shall be forwarded, by means specified in
regulations prescribed by the Secretary of De-
fense, directly to the United States Court of
Military Commission Review.
(g) APPEALS COURT TO ACT ONLY WITH RE-
SPECT TO MATTER OF LAW.—In ruling on an ap-
peal under paragraph (1), (2), or (3) of subsection
(a), the appeals court may act only with respect
to matters of law.
(h) SUBSEQUENT APPEAL RIGHTS
OF ACCUSED
NOT AFFECTED.—An appeal under paragraph (4)
of subsection (a), and a decision on such appeal,
shall not affect the right of the accused, in a
subsequent appeal from a judgment of convic-
tion, to claim as error reversal by the military
judge on remand of a ruling appealed from dur-
ing trial.
(Added Pub. L. 111–84, div. A, title XVIII, § 1802,
Oct. 28, 2009, 123 Stat. 2601.)
Editorial Notes
PRIOR PROVISIONS
A prior section 950d, added Pub. L. 109–366, § 3(a)(1),
Oct. 17, 2006, 120 Stat. 2620, related to appeal by the
United States, prior to the general amendment of this
chapter by Pub. L. 111–84.
§ 950e. Rehearings
(a) COMPOSITION OF MILITARY COMMISSION FOR
REHEARING.—Each rehearing under this chapter
shall take place before a military commission
under this chapter composed of members who
were not members of the military commission
which first heard the case.
(b) SCOPE OF REHEARING.—(1) Upon a rehear-
ing—
(A) the accused may not be tried for any of-
fense of which the accused was found not
guilty by the first military commission; and
(B) no sentence in excess of or more than the
original sentence may be imposed unless—
(i) the sentence is based upon a finding of
guilty of an offense not considered upon the
merits in the original proceedings; or
(ii) the sentence prescribed for the offense
is mandatory.
(2) Upon a rehearing, if the sentence approved
after the first military commission was in ac-
cordance with a pretrial agreement and the ac-
cused at the rehearing changes his plea with re-
spect to the charges or specifications upon
which the pretrial agreement was based, or oth-
erwise does not comply with pretrial agreement,
the sentence as to those charges or specifica-
tions may include any punishment not in excess
of that lawfully adjudged at the first military
commission.
(Added Pub. L. 111–84, div. A, title XVIII, § 1802,
Oct. 28, 2009, 123 Stat. 2602.)
Editorial Notes
PRIOR PROVISIONS
A prior section 950e, added Pub. L. 109–366, § 3(a)(1),
Oct. 17, 2006, 120 Stat. 2621, related to rehearings, prior
to the general amendment of this chapter by Pub. L.
111–84.
§ 950f. Review by United States Court of Military
Commission Review
(a) ESTABLISHMENT.—There is a court of record
to be known as the ‘‘United States Court of
Military Commission Review’’ (in this section
referred to as the ‘‘Court’’). The Court shall con-
sist of one or more panels, each composed of not
less than three judges on the Court. For the pur-
pose of reviewing decisions of military commis-
sions under this chapter, the Court may sit in
panels or as a whole, in accordance with rules
prescribed by the Secretary of Defense.
Cross-references
Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a) Interlocutory Appeal.—** Except as provided in subsection (b), in a trial by military commission under this chapter, the United States may take an interlocutory appeal to the United States Court of Military Commission Review of any order or ruling of the military judge—
(1) that terminates proceedings of the military commission with respect to a charge or specification;
(2) that excludes evidence that is substantial proof of a fact material in the proceeding;
(3) that relates to a matter under subsection (c) or (d) of [section 949d of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title10-section949d&num=0&edition=prelim); or
(4) that, with respect to classified information—
(A) authorizes the disclosure of such information;
(B) imposes sanctions for nondisclosure of such information; or
(C) refuses a protective order sought by the United States to prevent the disclosure of such information.
**(b) Limitation.—** The United States may not appeal under subsection (a) an order or ruling that is, or amounts to, a finding of not guilty by the military commission with respect to a charge or specification.
**(c) Scope of Appeal Right With Respect to Classified Information.—** The United States has the right to appeal under paragraph (4) of subsection (a) whenever the military judge enters an order or ruling that would require the disclosure of classified information, without regard to whether the order or ruling appealed from was entered under this chapter, another provision of law, a rule, or otherwise. Any such appeal may embrace any preceding order, ruling, or reasoning constituting the basis of the order or ruling that would authorize such disclosure.
**(d) Timing and Action on Interlocutory Appeals Relating to Classified Inf
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 10 U.S.C. § 950d
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.