Browse Arkansas Code titles and sections
35 U.S.C. § 312 — Petitions
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 126
TITLE 35—PATENTS
§ 312
the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual
Property and Director of the United States Patent and
Trademark Office to submit to Congress a report on
possible inequities of certain inter partes reexamina-
tion proceedings no later than 5 years after Nov. 29,
1999.
§ 312. Petitions
(a) REQUIREMENTS
OF
PETITION.—A petition
filed under section 311 may be considered only
if—
(1) the petition is accompanied by payment
of the fee established by the Director under
section 311;
(2) the petition identifies all real parties in
interest;
(3) the petition identifies, in writing and
with particularity, each claim challenged, the
grounds on which the challenge to each claim
is based, and the evidence that supports the
grounds for the challenge to each claim, in-
cluding—
(A) copies of patents and printed publica-
tions that the petitioner relies upon in sup-
port of the petition; and
(B) affidavits or declarations of supporting
evidence and opinions, if the petitioner re-
lies on expert opinions;
(4) the petition provides such other informa-
tion as the Director may require by regula-
tion; and
(5) the petitioner provides copies of any of
the documents required under paragraphs (2),
(3), and (4) to the patent owner or, if applica-
ble, the designated representative of the pat-
ent owner.
(b) PUBLIC AVAILABILITY.—As soon as prac-
ticable after the receipt of a petition under sec-
tion 311, the Director shall make the petition
available to the public.
(Added Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, § 1000(a)(9) [title
IV, § 4604(a)], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1536,
1501A–568; amended Pub. L. 107–273, div. C, title
III, §§ 13105(a), 13202(a)(2), (c)(1), Nov. 2, 2002, 116
Stat. 1900–1902; Pub. L. 112–29, § 6(a), (c)(3)(A)(i),
Sept. 16, 2011
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 35 U.S.C. § 312
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.
Original supplied file — preserved unchanged
Download original Markdown file
File SHA-256: 2685ed4bdece681e775ac606302dcb4bc21b305f86b9ea314b4562bd0cbdc26b. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.
Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.
Open the recorded source website ↗
Record provenance
Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:usc2024-0571c8cd8882d9c5fabf704b
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code-2024/title-35/section-312-petitions--be4df81bed.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: 27e4af16861c80c7430297282414c4686bef4ae30cda1982919f92a783f02047
Source location: USCODE-2024-title35-partIII-chap31-sec312.pdf
Stored source content
Page 126
TITLE 35—PATENTS
§ 312
the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual
Property and Director of the United States Patent and
Trademark Office to submit to Congress a report on
possible inequities of certain inter partes reexamina-
tion proceedings no later than 5 years after Nov. 29,
1999.
§ 312. Petitions
(a) REQUIREMENTS
OF
PETITION.—A petition
filed under section 311 may be considered only
if—
(1) the petition is accompanied by payment
of the fee established by the Director under
section 311;
(2) the petition identifies all real parties in
interest;
(3) the petition identifies, in writing and
with particularity, each claim challenged, the
grounds on which the challenge to each claim
is based, and the evidence that supports the
grounds for the challenge to each claim, in-
cluding—
(A) copies of patents and printed publica-
tions that the petitioner relies upon in sup-
port of the petition; and
(B) affidavits or declarations of supporting
evidence and opinions, if the petitioner re-
lies on expert opinions;
(4) the petition provides such other informa-
tion as the Director may require by regula-
tion; and
(5) the petitioner provides copies of any of
the documents required under paragraphs (2),
(3), and (4) to the patent owner or, if applica-
ble, the designated representative of the pat-
ent owner.
(b) PUBLIC AVAILABILITY.—As soon as prac-
ticable after the receipt of a petition under sec-
tion 311, the Director shall make the petition
available to the public.
(Added Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, § 1000(a)(9) [title
IV, § 4604(a)], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1536,
1501A–568; amended Pub. L. 107–273, div. C, title
III, §§ 13105(a), 13202(a)(2), (c)(1), Nov. 2, 2002, 116
Stat. 1900–1902; Pub. L. 112–29, § 6(a), (c)(3)(A)(i),
Sept. 16, 2011, 125 Stat. 300, 305.)
Editorial Notes
AMENDMENTS
2011—Pub. L. 112–29, § 6(a), amended section generally.
Prior to amendment, section related to determination
of issue by Director.
Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 112–29, § 6(c)(3)(A)(i)(I), sub-
stituted ‘‘the information presented in the request
shows that there is a reasonable likelihood that the re-
quester would prevail with respect to at least 1 of the
claims challenged in the request,’’ for ‘‘a substantial
new question of patentability affecting any claim of
the patent concerned is raised by the request,’’ and ‘‘A
showing that there is a reasonable likelihood that the
requester would prevail with respect to at least 1 of the
claims challenged in the request’’ for ‘‘The existence of
a substantial new question of patentability’’.
Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 112–29, § 6(c)(3)(A)(i)(II), sub-
stituted ‘‘the showing required by subsection (a) has
not been made,’’ for ‘‘no substantial new question of
patentability has been raised,’’.
2002—Pub. L. 107–273, § 13202(c)(1), made technical cor-
rection to directory language of Pub. L. 106–113, which
enacted this section.
Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 107–273, § 13202(a)(2)(A), struck out
second sentence which read as follows: ‘‘On the Direc-
tor’s initiative, and at any time, the Director may de-
termine whether a substantial new question of patent-
ability is raised by patents and publications.’’
Pub. L. 107–273, § 13105(a), inserted at end ‘‘The exist-
ence of a substantial new question of patentability is
not precluded by the fact that a patent or printed pub-
lication was previously cited by or to the Office or con-
sidered by the Office.’’
Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 107–273, § 13202(a)(2)(B), struck out
‘‘, if any’’ after ‘‘third-party requester’’.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 2011 AMENDMENT
Amendment by section 6(a) of Pub. L. 112–29 effective
upon the expiration of the 1-year period beginning on
Sept. 16, 2011, and applicable to any patent issued be-
fore, on, or after that effective date, with provisions for
graduated implementation, see section 6(c)(2) of Pub. L.
112–29, set out as a note under section 311 of this title.
Pub. L. 112–29, § 6(c)(3)(B), (C), Sept. 16, 2011, 125 Stat.
305, provided that:
‘‘(B) APPLICATION.—The amendments made by this
paragraph [amending this section and section 313 of
this title]—
‘‘(i) shall take effect on the date of the enactment
of this Act [Sept. 16, 2011]; and
‘‘(ii) shall apply to requests for inter partes reexam-
ination that are filed on or after such date of enact-
ment, but before the effective date set forth in para-
graph (2)(A) of this subsection [set out as a note
under section 311 of this title].
‘‘(C) CONTINUED APPLICABILITY OF PRIOR PROVISIONS.—
The provisions of chapter 31 of title 35, United States
Code, as amended by this paragraph [amending this sec-
tion and section 313 of this title], shall continue to
apply to requests for inter partes reexamination that
are filed before the effective date set forth in paragraph
(2)(A) as if subsection (a) [enacting section 319 of this
title and amending this section and sections 312 to 318
of this title] had not been enacted.’’
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 2002 AMENDMENT
Amendment by section 13105(a) of Pub. L. 107–273 ap-
plicable with respect to any determination of the Di-
rector of the United States Patent and Trademark Of-
fice that is made on or after Nov. 2, 2002, see section
13105(b) of Pub. L. 107–273, set out as a note under sec-
tion 303 of this title.
EFFECTIVE DATE
Section effective Nov. 29, 1999, and applicable to any
patent issuing from an original application filed in the
United States on or after that date, see section
1000(a)(9) [title IV, § 4608(a)] of Pub. L. 106–113, set out
as an Effective Date of 1999 Amendment note under sec-
tion 41 of this title.
§ 313. Preliminary response to petition
If an inter partes review petition is filed under
section 311, the patent owner shall have the
right to file a preliminary response to the peti-
tion, within a time period set by the Director,
that sets forth reasons why no inter partes re-
view should be instituted based upon the failure
of the petition to meet any requirement of this
chapter.
(Added Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, § 1000(a)(9) [title
IV, § 4604(a)], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1536,
1501A–568; amended Pub. L. 107–273, div. C, title
III, § 13202(c)(1), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1902; Pub.
L. 112–29, § 6(a), (c)(3)(A)(ii), Sept. 16, 2011, 125
Stat. 300, 305.)
Cross-references
Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a) Requirements of Petition.—** A petition filed under section 311 may be considered only if—
(1) the petition is accompanied by payment of the fee established by the Director under section 311;
(2) the petition identifies all real parties in interest;
(3) the petition identifies, in writing and with particularity, each claim challenged, the grounds on which the challenge to each claim is based, and the evidence that supports the grounds for the challenge to each claim, including—
(A) copies of patents and printed publications that the petitioner relies upon in support of the petition; and
(B) affidavits or declarations of supporting evidence and opinions, if the petitioner relies on expert opinions;
(4) the petition provides such other information as the Director may require by regulation; and
(5) the petitioner provides copies of any of the documents required under paragraphs (2), (3), and (4) to the patent owner or, if applicable, the designated representative of the patent owner.
**(b) Public Availability.—** As soon as practicable after the receipt of a petition under section 311, the Director shall make the petition available to the public.
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 35 U.S.C. § 312
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.