Browse Arkansas Code titles and sections
40 U.S.C. § 8301 — Definition
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
In this chapter, the term “Washington metropolitan region” includes the District of Columbia, the counties of Montgomery and Prince Georges in Maryland, and the counties of Arlington and Fairfax and the cities of Alexandria and Falls Church in Virginia.
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 40 U.S.C. § 8301
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.
Original supplied file — preserved unchanged
Download original Markdown file
File SHA-256: 06ae27589796f3e72fd8661f5f92462423e3b3f3545fb8fdabe902cb2d94e3a6. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.
Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.
Open the recorded source website ↗
Record provenance
Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:record_usc_da225b7a44b11ec559f415e8
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code/title-40/section-8301-in-this-chapter-the-term-washington-metropolitan-region-includes-the-dis--d0c80059f8.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: 5b8402c4f646ac0c634f4e80274d2ca85235e9068368ce74835f150e1cdbe755
Source location: Title 40, Chapter 83, § 8301; chapter-083-washington-metropolitan-region-development.md
Stored source content
In this chapter, the term “Washington metropolitan region” includes the District of Columbia, the counties of Montgomery and Prince Georges in Maryland, and the counties of Arlington and Fairfax and the cities of Alexandria and Falls Church in Virginia.
Cross-references
Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a) Office of Director of National Intelligence** There is an Office of the Director of National Intelligence.
**(b) Function** The function of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence is to assist the Director of National Intelligence in carrying out the duties and responsibilities of the Director under this Act and other applicable provisions of law, and to carry out such other duties as may be prescribed by the President or by law.
**(c) Composition** The Office of the Director of National Intelligence is composed of the following:
(1) The Director of National Intelligence.
(2) The Principal Deputy Director of National Intelligence.
(3) Any Deputy Director of National Intelligence appointed under [section 3026 of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title50-section3026&num=0&edition=prelim).
(4) The National Intelligence Council.
(5) The National Intelligence Management Council.
(6) The General Counsel.
(7) The Civil Liberties Protection Officer.
(8) The Director of Science and Technology.
(9) The Director of the National Counterintelligence and Security Center.
(10) The Chief Information Officer of the Intelligence Community.
(11) The Inspector General of the Intelligence Community.
(12) The Director of the National Counterterrorism Center.
(13) The Director of the National Counter Proliferation Center.11 See Change of Name note below.
(14) The Chief Financial Officer of the Intelligence Community.
(15) Such other offices and officials as may be established by law or the Director may establish or designate in the Office.
**(d) Staff**
(1) To assist the Director of National Intelligence in fulfilling the duties and responsibilities of the Director, the Director shall employ and utilize in the Office
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 50 U.S.C. § 3031
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Incoming connection: Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 189
TITLE 40—PUBLIC BUILDINGS, PROPERTY, AND WORKS
§ 8304
In this section, the words ‘‘the Director of the Office
of Personnel Management and the examinations pro-
vided for in sections 3304 and 3305 of title 5’’ are sub-
stituted for ‘‘said commission and said examinations’’
in section 4 of the Act of January 16, 1883, because of
section 102 of Reorganization Plan No. 2 of 1978 (eff.
Jan. 1, 1979, 92 Stat. 3783) and section 7(b) of the Act of
September 6, 1966 (Public Law 89–554, 80 Stat. 631), the
first section of which enacted Title 5, United States
Code. The words ‘‘Administrator of General Services’’
are substituted for ‘‘Secretary of the Interior’’ [subse-
quently changed to ‘‘Civil Service Commission’’ be-
cause of section 1 (1st complete par. on p. 642) of the
Act of May 29, 1920 (ch. 214, 41 Stat. 642)] because of sec-
tions 1 and 2 of Reorganization Plan No. 18 of 1950 (eff.
July 1, 1950, 64 Stat. 1270).
CHAPTER 83—WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN
REGION DEVELOPMENT
Sec.
8301.
Definition.
8302.
Necessity for coordination in the develop-
ment of the Washington metropolitan re-
gion.
8303.
Declaration of policy of coordinated develop-
ment and management.
8304.
Priority projects.
§ 8301. Definition
In this chapter, the term ‘‘Washington metro-
politan region’’ includes the District of Colum-
bia, the counties of Montgomery and Prince
Georges in Maryland, and the counties of Ar-
lington and Fairfax and the cities of Alexandria
and Falls Church in Virginia.
(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1210.)
HISTORICAL AND REVISION NOTES
Revised
Section
Source (U.S. Code)
Source (Statutes at Large)
8301 ............
40:135.
Pub. L. 86–527, § 6, June 27,
1960, 74 Stat. 224.
§ 8302. Necessity for coordination in the develop-
ment of the Was
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 40 U.S.C. § 8301
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.