Browse Arkansas Code titles and sections
28 U.S.C. § 1738C — Certain acts, records, and proceedings and the effect thereof
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a) In General.—** No person acting under color of State law may deny—
(1) full faith and credit to any public act, record, or judicial proceeding of any other State pertaining to a marriage between 2 individuals, on the basis of the sex, race, ethnicity, or national origin of those individuals; or
(2) a right or claim arising from such a marriage on the basis that such marriage would not be recognized under the law of that State on the basis of the sex, race, ethnicity, or national origin of those individuals.
**(b) Enforcement by Attorney General.—** The Attorney General may bring a civil action in the appropriate United States district court against any person who violates subsection (a) for declaratory and injunctive relief.
**(c) Private Right of Action.—** Any person who is harmed by a violation of subsection (a) may bring a civil action in the appropriate United States district court against the person who violated such subsection for declaratory and injunctive relief.
**(d) State Defined.—** In this section, the term “State” has the meaning given such term under [section 7 of title 1](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title1-section7&num=0&edition=prelim).
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 28 U.S.C. § 1738C
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.
Original supplied file — preserved unchanged
Download original Markdown file
File SHA-256: 2d3b318e60f16fa0ee390ed556771a3a79fe4b924494023c3fdea085b8cf8575. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.
Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.
Open the recorded source website ↗
Record provenance
Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:record_usc_cb7ed7bf5c27eac0db625bf2
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code/title-28/section-1738c-certain-acts-records-and-proceedings-and-the-effect-thereof--8b274793f3.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: 10cfd4a903af71af4e91ae669456129da204fe0e448448b9ffc74e8cf5c547df
Source location: Title 28, Chapter 115, § 1738C; chapter-115-evidence-documentary.md
Stored source content
**(a) In General.—** No person acting under color of State law may deny—
(1) full faith and credit to any public act, record, or judicial proceeding of any other State pertaining to a marriage between 2 individuals, on the basis of the sex, race, ethnicity, or national origin of those individuals; or
(2) a right or claim arising from such a marriage on the basis that such marriage would not be recognized under the law of that State on the basis of the sex, race, ethnicity, or national origin of those individuals.
**(b) Enforcement by Attorney General.—** The Attorney General may bring a civil action in the appropriate United States district court against any person who violates subsection (a) for declaratory and injunctive relief.
**(c) Private Right of Action.—** Any person who is harmed by a violation of subsection (a) may bring a civil action in the appropriate United States district court against the person who violated such subsection for declaratory and injunctive relief.
**(d) State Defined.—** In this section, the term “State” has the meaning given such term under [section 7 of title 1](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title1-section7&num=0&edition=prelim).
Cross-references
Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a)** For the purposes of any Federal law, rule, or regulation in which marital status is a factor, an individual shall be considered married if that individual’s marriage is between 2 individuals and is valid in the State where the marriage was entered into or, in the case of a marriage entered into outside any State, if the marriage is between 2 individuals and is valid in the place where entered into and the marriage could have been entered into in a State.
**(b)** In this section, the term “State” means a State, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, or any other territory or possession of the United States.
**(c)** For purposes of subsection (a), in determining whether a marriage is valid in a State or the place where entered into, if outside of any State, only the law of the jurisdiction applicable at the time the marriage was entered into may be considered.
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 1 U.S.C. § 7
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
In determining the meaning of any Act of Congress, unless the context indicates otherwise—
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 1 U.S.C. § 1
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Incoming connection: Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 453
TITLE 28—JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE
§ 1739
‘‘(A) encourage noncustodial parents to relocate
outside the States where their children and the cus-
todial parents reside to avoid the jurisdiction of the
courts of such States, resulting in an increase in
the amount of interstate travel and communication
required to establish and collect on child support
orders and a burden on custodial parents that is ex-
pensive, time consuming, and disruptive of occupa-
tions and commercial activity;
‘‘(B) contribute to the pressing problem of rel-
atively low levels of child support payments in
interstate cases and to inequities in child support
payments levels that are based solely on the non-
custodial parent’s choice of residence;
‘‘(C) encourage a disregard of court orders result-
ing in massive arrearages nationwide;
‘‘(D) allow noncustodial parents to avoid the pay-
ment of regularly scheduled child support payments
for extensive periods of time, resulting in substan-
tial hardship for the children for whom support is
due and for their custodians; and
‘‘(E) lead to the excessive relitigation of cases
and to the establishment of conflicting orders by
the courts of various jurisdictions, resulting in con-
fusion, waste of judicial resources, disrespect for
the courts, and a diminution of public confidence in
the rule of law; and
‘‘(4) among the results of the conditions described
in this subsection are—
‘‘(A) the failure of the courts of the States to give
full faith and credit to the judicial proceedings of
the other States;
‘‘(B) the deprivation of rights of liberty and prop-
erty without due process of law;
‘‘(C) burdens on commerce among the States; and
‘‘(D) harm to the welfare of children and their
parents and other custodians.
‘‘(b) STA
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 28 U.S.C. § 1738C
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.