Browse Arkansas Code titles and sections

15 U.S.C. § 7002 — Exemption to preemption

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

15 U.S.C. § 7002 — Exemption to preemption

**(a) In general** A State statute, regulation, or other rule of law may modify, limit, or supersede the provisions of [section 7001 of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title15-section7001&num=0&edition=prelim) with respect to State law only if such statute, regulation, or rule of law— (1) constitutes an enactment or adoption of the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act as approved and recommended for enactment in all the States by the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws in 1999, except that any exception to the scope of such Act enacted by a State under section 3(b)(4) of such Act shall be preempted to the extent such exception is inconsistent with this subchapter or subchapter II, or would not be permitted under paragraph (2)(A)(ii) of this subsection; or (2) (A) specifies the alternative procedures or requirements for the use or acceptance (or both) of electronic records or electronic signatures to establish the legal effect, validity, or enforceability of contracts or other records, if— (i) such alternative procedures or requirements are consistent with this subchapter and subchapter II; and (ii) such alternative procedures or requirements do not require, or accord greater legal status or effect to, the implementation or application of a specific technology or technical specification for performing the functions of creating, storing, generating, receiving, communicating, or authenticating electronic records or electronic signatures; and (B) if enacted or adopted after June 30, 2000, makes specific reference to this chapter. **(b) Exceptions for actions by States as market participants** Subsection (a)(2)(A)(ii) shall not apply to the statutes, regulations, or other rules of law governing

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 15 U.S.C. § 7002

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.

Original supplied file — preserved unchanged

Download original Markdown file

File SHA-256: 2fccb8fcd45d9afbc2abb2eea20ec5b05b5a818cded9f00966984fb0104c0dd3. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.

Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.

Open the recorded source website ↗

Record provenance

Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:record_usc_c94b0fc738a516b8139b5168
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code/title-15/section-7002-exemption-to-preemption--2c84b0fee7.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: 9c833c3fcaf7f07daf4e36c302b72a9b2daade21640433f2c245a1ef815837a7

Source location: Title 15, Chapter 96, § 7002; chapter-096-electronic-signatures-in-global-and-national-commerce.md

Stored source content

Cross-references

Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

15 U.S.C. § 7001 — General rule of validity

**(a) In general** Notwithstanding any statute, regulation, or other rule of law (other than this subchapter and subchapter II), with respect to any transaction in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce— (1) a signature, contract, or other record relating to such transaction may not be denied legal effect, validity, or enforceability solely because it is in electronic form; and (2) a contract relating to such transaction may not be denied legal effect, validity, or enforceability solely because an electronic signature or electronic record was used in its formation. **(b) Preservation of rights and obligations** This subchapter does not— (1) limit, alter, or otherwise affect any requirement imposed by a statute, regulation, or rule of law relating to the rights and obligations of persons under such statute, regulation, or rule of law other than a requirement that contracts or other records be written, signed, or in nonelectronic form; or (2) require any person to agree to use or accept electronic records or electronic signatures, other than a governmental agency with respect to a record other than a contract to which it is a party. **(c) Consumer disclosures** (1) **Consent to electronic records** — Notwithstanding subsection (a), if a statute, regulation, or other rule of law requires that information relating to a transaction or transactions in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce be provided or made available to a consumer in writing, the use of an electronic record to provide or make available (whichever is required) such information satisfies the requirement that such information be in writing if— (A) the consumer has affirmatively consented to such use and has not withdrawn such consent; (B) the consumer, prior to consenting, is provided wi

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 15 U.S.C. § 7001

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

15 U.S.C. § 7002 — Exemption to preemption

Page 2306 TITLE 15—COMMERCE AND TRADE § 7002 signature may not be held liable for any defi- ciency in the electronic procedures agreed to by the parties under that contract if— (1) the agent or broker has not engaged in negligent, reckless, or intentional tortious conduct; (2) the agent or broker was not involved in the development or establishment of such electronic procedures; and (3) the agent or broker did not deviate from such procedures. (Pub. L. 106–229, title I, § 101, June 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 464.) Editorial Notes REFERENCES IN TEXT This chapter, referred to in subsec. (c)(2)(B), was in the original ‘‘this Act’’, meaning Pub. L. 106–229, June 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 464, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note below and Tables. For the effective date of this subchapter, referred to in subsec. (c)(5), see Effective Date note below. Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries EFFECTIVE DATE Pub. L. 106–229, title I, § 107, June 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 473, provided that: ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in subsection (b), this title [enacting this subchapter] shall be effec- tive on October 1, 2000. ‘‘(b) EXCEPTIONS.— ‘‘(1) RECORD RETENTION.— ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Subject to subparagraph (B), this title [enacting this subchapter] shall be effec- tive on March 1, 2001, with respect to a requirement that a record be retained imposed by— ‘‘(i) a Federal statute, regulation, or other rule of law, or ‘‘(ii) a State statute, regulation, or other rule of law administered or promulgated by a State regu- latory agency. ‘‘(B) DELAYED EFFECT FOR PENDING RULEMAKINGS.—If on March 1, 2001, a Federal regu- latory agency or State regulatory agency has an- nounced, proposed, or

Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 15 U.S.C. § 7002

Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.