Browse Arkansas Code titles and sections

25 U.S.C. § 955 — Omitted

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

25 U.S.C. § 955 — Omitted

### Statutory Notes #### Codification Section, Pub. L. 86–339, § 5, Sept. 21, 1959, 73 Stat. 604; Pub. L. 100–581, title II, § 216, Nov. 1, 1988, 102 Stat. 2941, which related to tax exemptions for equalization allotments and cash payments received in lieu thereof, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 25 U.S.C. § 955

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.

Original supplied file — preserved unchanged

Download original Markdown file

File SHA-256: 91e5266b10296948542d0c28bdeea1ac15569d83bafcf96a943d954a25663f06. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.

Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.

Open the recorded source website ↗

Record provenance

Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:record_usc_c54eefe0c67e0769845afdff
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code/title-25/section-955-omitted--27c28d4874.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: c405bd6d81779e637e587257819bd1b9bcc31a19d9811eabf28b0ace7db79565

Source location: Title 25, Chapter 14, § 955; chapter-014-miscellaneous.md

Stored source content

Cross-references

Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

25 U.S.C. § 162a — Deposit of tribal funds in banks; bond or collateral security; investments; collections from irrigation projects; affirmative action required

**(a) Deposit of tribal trust funds in banks** The Secretary of the Interior is hereby authorized in his discretion, and under such rules and regulations as he may prescribe, to withdraw from the United States Treasury and to deposit in banks to be selected by him the common or community funds of any Indian tribe which are, or may hereafter be, held in trust by the United States and on which the United States is not obligated by law to pay interest at higher rates than can be procured from the banks. The said Secretary is also authorized, under such rules and regulations as he may prescribe, to withdraw from the United States Treasury and to deposit in banks to be selected by him the funds held in trust by the United States for the benefit of individual Indians: Provided, That no individual Indian money shall be deposited in any bank until the bank shall have agreed to pay interest thereon at a reasonable rate, subject, however, to the regulations of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System in the case of member banks, and of the Board of Directors of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation in the case of insured nonmember banks, except that the payment of interest may be waived in the discretion of the Secretary of the Interior on any deposit which is payable on demand: Provided further, That no tribal or individual Indian money shall be deposited in any bank until the bank shall have furnished an acceptable bond or pledged collateral security therefor in the form of any public-debt obligations of the United States and any bonds, notes, or other obligations which are unconditionally guaranteed as to both interest and principal by the United States, except that no such bond or collateral shall be required to be furnished by any such bank which is entitled

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 25 U.S.C. § 162a

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Incoming connection: Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

25 U.S.C. § 955 — Omitted

Page 186 TITLE 25—INDIANS § 953 Band alive on Sept. 21, 1959, who had not yet received an allotment of land to be given such an allotment and provided for no further allotments of land to be made thereafter, was omitted from the Code as being of spe- cial and not general application. § 953. Omitted Editorial Notes CODIFICATION Section, Pub. L. 86–339, § 3, Sept. 21, 1959, 73 Stat. 602; Pub. L. 105–308, § 4(a), Oct. 30, 1998, 112 Stat. 2934, which related to determination of value of unallotted and al- lotted lands and equalization of value of allotments and designated certain lands not subject to allotment as tribal reserves, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application. § 954. Omitted Editorial Notes CODIFICATION Section, Pub. L. 86–339, § 4, Sept. 21, 1959, 73 Stat. 604; Pub. L. 90–597, Oct. 17, 1968, 82 Stat. 1164, which related to powers and duties of guardians, conservators, and other fiduciaries, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application. § 955. Omitted Editorial Notes CODIFICATION Section, Pub. L. 86–339, § 5, Sept. 21, 1959, 73 Stat. 604; Pub. L. 100–581, title II, § 216, Nov. 1, 1988, 102 Stat. 2941, which related to tax exemptions for equalization allot- ments and cash payments received in lieu thereof, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not gen- eral application. § 956. Omitted Editorial Notes CODIFICATION Section, Pub. L. 86–339, § 6, Sept. 21, 1959, 73 Stat. 604, which related to claims against allotments, was omit- ted from the Code as being of special and not general application. § 957. Omitted Editorial Notes CODIFICATION Section, Pub. L. 86–339, § 7, Sept. 21, 1959, 73 Stat. 605, which provided that allotments in accordance with the provisions o

Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 25 U.S.C. § 955

Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.