Arkansas Legal Resource Navigator

21 U.S.C. § 360n — Priority review to encourage treatments for tropical diseases

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

21 U.S.C. § 360n — Priority review to encourage treatments for tropical diseases

**(a) Definitions** In this section: (1) **Priority review** — The term “priority review”, with respect to a human drug application as defined in [section 379g(1) of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title21-section379g/1&num=0&edition=prelim), means review and action by the Secretary on such application not later than 6 months after receipt by the Secretary of such application, as described in the Manual of Policies and Procedures of the Food and Drug Administration and goals identified in the letters described in section 101(c) of the Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act of 2007. (2) **Priority review voucher** — The term “priority review voucher” means a voucher issued by the Secretary to the sponsor of a tropical disease product application that entitles the holder of such voucher to priority review of a single human drug application submitted under [section 355(b)(1) of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title21-section355/b/1&num=0&edition=prelim) or [section 262 of title 42](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title42-section262&num=0&edition=prelim) after the date of approval of the tropical disease product application. (3) **Tropical disease** — The term “tropical disease” means any of the following: (A) Tuberculosis. (B) Malaria. (C) Blinding trachoma. (D) Buruli Ulcer. (E) Cholera. (F) Dengue/dengue haemorrhagic fever. (G) Dracunculiasis (guinea-worm disease). (H) Fascioliasis. (I) Human African trypanosomiasis. (J) Leishmaniasis. (K) Leprosy. (L) Lymphatic filariasis. (M) Onchocerciasis. (N) Schistosomiasis. (O) Soil transmitted helmithiasis. (P) Yaws. (Q) Filovirus Diseases. (R) Zika Virus Dise

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 21 U.S.C. § 360n

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.

Original supplied file — preserved unchanged

Download original Markdown file

File SHA-256: 2282907782c71f45565b95391e2fa4357c58664834521d1df36e5abb82c2b8ed. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.

Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.

Open the recorded source website ↗

Record provenance

Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:record_usc_c3f2e958560a21116413cc85
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code/title-21/section-360n-priority-review-to-encourage-treatments-for-tropical-diseases--6a518201f2.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: 9172f13f86b349f9262f39eae77976d8d9f4a550a9add90bfa6298934c7f2253

Source location: Title 21, Chapter 9, § 360n; chapter-009-federal-food-drug-and-cosmetic-act.md

Stored source content

**(a) Definitions** In this section: (1) **Priority review** — The term “priority review”, with respect to a human drug application as defined in [section 379g(1) of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title21-section379g/1&num=0&edition=prelim), means review and action by the Secretary on such application not later than 6 months after receipt by the Secretary of such application, as described in the Manual of Policies and Procedures of the Food and Drug Administration and goals identified in the letters described in section 101(c) of the Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act of 2007. (2) **Priority review voucher** — The term “priority review voucher” means a voucher issued by the Secretary to the sponsor of a tropical disease product application that entitles the holder of such voucher to priority review of a single human drug application submitted under [section 355(b)(1) of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title21-section355/b/1&num=0&edition=prelim) or [section 262 of title 42](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title42-section262&num=0&edition=prelim) after the date of approval of the tropical disease product application. (3) **Tropical disease** — The term “tropical disease” means any of the following: (A) Tuberculosis. (B) Malaria. (C) Blinding trachoma. (D) Buruli Ulcer. (E) Cholera. (F) Dengue/dengue haemorrhagic fever. (G) Dracunculiasis (guinea-worm disease). (H) Fascioliasis. (I) Human African trypanosomiasis. (J) Leishmaniasis. (K) Leprosy. (L) Lymphatic filariasis. (M) Onchocerciasis. (N) Schistosomiasis. (O) Soil transmitted helmithiasis. (P) Yaws. (Q) Filovirus Diseases. (R) Zika Virus Disease. (S) Any other infectious disease for which there is no significant market in developed nations and that disproportionately affects poor and marginalized populations, designated by order of the Secretary. (4) **Tropical disease product application** — The term “tropical disease product application” means an application that— (A) is a human drug application as defined in [section 379g(1) of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title21-section379g/1&num=0&edition=prelim)— (i) for prevention or treatment of a tropical disease; (ii) the Secretary deems eligible for priority review; (iii) that contains reports of one or more new clinical investigations (other than bioavailability studies) that are essential to the approval of the application and conducted or sponsored by the sponsor of such application; and (iv) that contains an attestation from the sponsor of the application that such reports were not submitted as part of an application for marketing approval or licensure by a regulatory authority in India, Brazil, Thailand, or any country that is a member of the Pharmaceutical Inspection Convention or the Pharmaceutical Inspection Cooperation Scheme prior to September 27, 2007.11 So in original. The period probably should be a semicolon. (B) is approved after September 27, 2007, by the Secretary for use in the prevention, detection, or treatment of a tropical disease; and (C) is for— (i) a human drug, no active moiety (as defined by the Secretary in section 314.3 of title 21, Code of Federal Regulations (or any successor regulations)) of which has been approved in any other application under [section 355(b)(1) of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title21-section355/b/1&num=0&edition=prelim); or (ii) a biological product, no active ingredient of which has been approved in any other application under [section 262 of title 42](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title42-section262&num=0&edition=prelim). **(b) Priority review voucher** (1) **In general** — The Secretary shall award a priority review voucher to the sponsor of a tropical disease product application upon approval by the Secretary of such tropical disease product application. (2) **Transferability** — The sponsor of a tropical disease product that receives a priority review voucher under this section may transfer (including by sale) the entitlement to such voucher to a sponsor of a human drug for which an application under [section 355(b)(1) of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title21-section355/b/1&num=0&edition=prelim) or [section 262 of title 42](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title42-section262&num=0&edition=prelim) will be submitted after the date of the approval of the tropical disease product application. There is no limit on the number of times a priority review voucher may be transferred before such voucher is used. (3) **Limitation** (A) *No award for prior approved application* — A sponsor of a tropical disease product may not receive a priority review voucher under this section if the tropical disease product application was submitted to the Secretary prior to September 27, 2007. (B) *One-year waiting period* — The Secretary shall issue a priority review voucher to the sponsor of a tropical disease product no earlier than the date that is 1 year after September 27, 2007. (4) **Notification** — The sponsor of a human drug application shall notify the Secretary not later than 90 days prior to submission of the human drug application that is the subject of a priority review voucher of an intent to submit the human drug application, including the date on which the sponsor intends to submit the application. Such notification shall be a legally binding commitment to pay for the user fee to be assessed in accordance with this section. **(c) Priority review user fee** (1) **In general** — The Secretary shall establish a user fee program under which a sponsor of a human drug application that is the subject of a priority review voucher shall pay to the Secretary a fee determined under paragraph (2). Such fee shall be in addition to any fee required to be submitted by the sponsor under subchapter VII. (2) **Fee amount** — The amount of the priority review user fee shall be determined each fiscal year by the Secretary and based on the average cost incurred by the agency in the review of a human drug application subject to priority review in the previous fiscal year. (3) **Annual fee setting** — The Secretary shall establish, before the beginning of each fiscal year beginning after September 30, 2007, for that fiscal year, the amount of the priority review user fee. (4) **Payment** (A) *In general* — The priority review user fee required by this subsection shall be due upon the submission of a human drug application under [section 355(b)(1) of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title21-section355/b/1&num=0&edition=prelim) or [section 262 of title 42](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title42-section262&num=0&edition=prelim) for which the priority review voucher is used. (B) *Complete application* — An application described under subparagraph (A) for which the sponsor requests the use of a priority review voucher shall be considered incomplete if the fee required by this subsection and all other applicable user fees are not paid in accordance with the Secretary’s procedures for paying such fees. (C) *No waivers, exemptions, reductions, or refunds* — The Secretary may not grant a waiver, exemption, reduction, or refund of any fees due and payable under this section. (5) **Offsetting collections** — Fees collected pursuant to this subsection for any fiscal year— (A) shall be deposited and credited as offsetting collections to the account providing appropriations to the Food and Drug Administration; and (B) shall not be collected for any fiscal year except to the extent provided in advance in appropriation Acts.

Cross-references

Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

21 U.S.C. § 379g — Definitions

For purposes of this subpart: (1) The term “human drug application” means an application for— (A) approval of a new drug submitted under [section 355(b) of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title21-section355/b&num=0&edition=prelim), or (B) licensure of a biological product under subsection (a) of [section 262 of title 42](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title42-section262&num=0&edition=prelim). Such term does not include a supplement to such an application, does not include an application with respect to whole blood or a blood component for transfusion, does not include an application with respect to a bovine blood product for topical application licensed before September 1, 1992, does not include an application with respect to an allergenic extract product licensed before October 1, 2022, does not include an application with respect to a standardized allergenic extract product submitted pursuant to a notification to the applicant from the Secretary regarding the existence of a potency test that measures the allergenic activity of an allergenic extract product licensed by the applicant before October 1, 2022, does not include an application with respect to an in vitro diagnostic biologic product licensed under [section 262 of title 42](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title42-section262&num=0&edition=prelim), does not include an application with respect to a large volume parenteral drug product approved before September 1, 1992, does not include an application for a licensure of a biological product for further manufacturing use only, and does not include an application or supplement submitted by a State or Federal Government entity for a drug that is not distribute

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 21 U.S.C. § 379g

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

42 U.S.C. § 262 — Regulation of biological products

**(a) Biologics license** (1) No person shall introduce or deliver for introduction into interstate commerce any biological product unless— (A) a biologics license under this subsection or subsection (k) is in effect for the biological product; and (B) each package of the biological product is plainly marked with— (i) the proper name of the biological product contained in the package; (ii) the name, address, and applicable license number of the manufacturer of the biological product; and (iii) the expiration date of the biological product. (2) (A) The Secretary shall establish, by regulation, requirements for the approval, suspension, and revocation of biologics licenses. (B) *Pediatric studies.—* — A person that submits an application for a license under this paragraph shall submit to the Secretary as part of the application any assessments required under section 505B of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act [[21 U.S.C. 355c](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title21-section355c&num=0&edition=prelim)]. (C) The Secretary shall approve a biologics license application— (i) on the basis of a demonstration that— (I) the biological product that is the subject of the application is safe, pure, and potent; and (II) the facility in which the biological product is manufactured, processed, packed, or held meets standards designed to assure that the biological product continues to be safe, pure, and potent; and (ii) if the applicant (or other appropriate person) consents to the inspection of the facility that is the subject of the application, in accordance with subsection (c). (D) *Postmarket studies and clinical trials; labeling; risk evaluation and mitigation strategy.—* — A person that sub

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 42 U.S.C. § 262

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

21 U.S.C. § 301 — Short title

This chapter may be cited as the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 21 U.S.C. § 301

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Incoming connection: Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

21 U.S.C. § 360n — Priority review to encourage treatments

Page 389 TITLE 21—FOOD AND DRUGS § 360n 1 So in original. The period probably should be a semicolon. States shall submit to the Committee on Commerce [now Committee on Energy and Commerce] of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Labor and Human Resources [now Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions] of the Sen- ate a report describing the extent to which the pro- gram of accreditation required by the amendment made by subsection (a) [enacting this section] has been implemented. ‘‘(B) EVALUATION OF PROGRAM.—Not later than 6 months prior to the date on which, pursuant to sub- section (c) of section 523 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act [21 U.S.C. 360m(c)] (as added by sub- section (a)), the authority provided under subsection (a) of such section will terminate, the Comptroller General shall submit to the Committee on Commerce [now Committee on Energy and Commerce] of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Labor and Human Resources [now Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions] of the Sen- ate a report describing the use of accredited persons under such section 523, including an evaluation of the extent to which such use assisted the Secretary in carrying out the duties of the Secretary under such Act [21 U.S.C. 301 et seq.] with respect to devices, and the extent to which such use promoted actions which are contrary to the purposes of such Act. ‘‘(2) INCLUSION OF CERTAIN DEVICES WITHIN PROGRAM.— Not later than 3 years after the date of the enactment of this Act [Nov. 21, 1997], the Secretary of Health and Human Services shall submit to the Committee on Commerce of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Labor and Human Resources [now Com- mittee on Health, Education, Labor, and P

Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 21 U.S.C. § 360n

Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.