Browse Arkansas Code titles and sections

22 U.S.C. § 2678 — Reduction in earmarks if appropriations are less than authorizations

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

22 U.S.C. § 2678 — Reduction in earmarks if appropriations are less than authorizations

If the amount appropriated (or made available in the event of a sequestration order issued pursuant to the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 (Public Law 99–177; [[2 U.S.C. 900](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title2-section900&num=0&edition=prelim) et seq.])) for a fiscal year pursuant to any authorization of appropriations provided by an Act other than an appropriation Act is less than the authorization amount and a provision of that Act provides that a specified amount of the authorization amount shall be available only for a certain purpose, then the amount so specified shall be deemed to be reduced for that fiscal year to the amount which bears the same ratio to the specified amount as the amount appropriated (or made available in the event of sequestration) bears to the authorization amount.

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 22 U.S.C. § 2678

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.

Original supplied file — preserved unchanged

Download original Markdown file

File SHA-256: 5437b61c39cf64e2419f2a77fe89d13fb38818970640a22638f80ab6e0cfd676. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.

Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.

Open the recorded source website ↗

Record provenance

Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:record_usc_9011f928c1762a7655c69641
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code/title-22/section-2678-reduction-in-earmarks-if-appropriations-are-less-than-authorizations--68b72fe5f4.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: a6bfde215068fd6c2601501c3b6cbd5828950f8d322fcdba902d59a5817271b9

Source location: Title 22, Chapter 38, § 2678; chapter-038-department-of-state.md

Stored source content

Cross-references

Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

2 U.S.C. § 661 — Provisions relating to House of Representatives

**(a) Enforcement in House of Representatives** It shall not be in order in the House of Representatives to consider a rule or order that waives the application of [section 658d of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title2-section658d&num=0&edition=prelim). **(b) Disposition of points of order** (1) **Application to House of Representatives** — This subsection shall apply only to the House of Representatives. (2) **Threshold burden** — In order to be cognizable by the Chair, a point of order under [section 658d of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title2-section658d&num=0&edition=prelim) or subsection (a) of this section must specify the precise language on which it is premised. (3) **Question of consideration** — As disposition of points of order under [section 658d of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title2-section658d&num=0&edition=prelim) or subsection (a) of this section, the Chair shall put the question of consideration with respect to the proposition that is the subject of the points of order. (4) **Debate and intervening motions** — A question of consideration under this section shall be debatable for 10 minutes by each Member initiating a point of order and for 10 minutes by an opponent on each point of order, but shall otherwise be decided without intervening motion except one that the House adjourn or that the Committee of the Whole rise, as the case may be. (5) **Effect on amendment in order as original text** — The disposition of the question of consideration under this subsection with respect to a bill or joint resolution shall be considered also to determine the question of consideration under this subsection with respect to an amendm

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 2 U.S.C. § 661

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

2 U.S.C. § 900 — Statement of budget enforcement through sequestration; definitions

**(a) Omitted** **(b) General statement of budget enforcement through sequestration** This subchapter provides for budget enforcement as called for in House Concurrent Resolution 84 (105th Congress, 1st session). **(c) Definitions** As used in this subchapter: (1) The terms “budget authority”, “new budget authority”, “outlays”, and “deficit” have the meanings given to such terms in section 3 of the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 [[2 U.S.C. 622](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title2-section622&num=0&edition=prelim)] and “discretionary spending limit” shall mean the amounts specified in [section 901 of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title2-section901&num=0&edition=prelim). (2) The terms “sequester” and “sequestration” refer to or mean the cancellation of budgetary resources provided by discretionary appropriations or direct spending law. (3) The term “breach” means, for any fiscal year, the amount (if any) by which new budget authority or outlays for that year (within a category of discretionary appropriations) is above that category’s discretionary spending limit for new budget authority or outlays for that year, as the case may be. (4) (A) The term “nonsecurity category” means all discretionary appropriations not included in the security category defined in subparagraph (B). (B) The term “security category” includes discretionary appropriations associated with agency budgets for the Department of Defense, the Department of Homeland Security, the Department of Veterans Affairs, the National Nuclear Security Administration, the intelligence community management account (95–0401–0–1–054), and all budget accounts in budget function 150 (international affairs). (C

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 2 U.S.C. § 900

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

2 U.S.C. § 621 — Treatment of deposit insurance and agencies and other insurance programs

**(a) In general** This subchapter shall not apply to the credit or insurance activities of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, National Credit Union Administration, Resolution Trust Corporation, Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, National Flood Insurance, National Insurance Development Fund, Crop Insurance, or Tennessee Valley Authority. **(b) Study** The Director and the Director of the Congressional Budget Office shall each study whether the accounting for Federal deposit insurance programs should be on a cash basis on the same basis as loan guarantees, or on a different basis. Each Director shall report findings and recommendations to the President and the Congress on or before May 31, 1991. **(c) Access to data** For the purposes of subsection (b), the Office of Management and Budget and the Congressional Budget Office shall have access to all agency data that may facilitate these studies.

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 2 U.S.C. § 621

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

42 U.S.C. § 911 — Budgetary treatment of trust fund operations

**(a)** The receipts and disbursements of the Federal Old-Age and Survivors Insurance Trust Fund and the Federal Disability Insurance Trust Fund and the taxes imposed under sections 1401 and 3101 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 shall not be included in the totals of the budget of the United States Government as submitted by the President or of the congressional budget and shall be exempt from any general budget limitation imposed by statute on expenditures and net lending (budget outlays) of the United States Government. **(b)** No provision of law enacted after December 12, 1985 (other than a provision of an appropriation Act that appropriated funds authorized under this chapter as in effect on December 12, 1985) may provide for payments from the general fund of the Treasury to any Trust Fund specified in subsection (a) or for payments from any such Trust Fund to the general fund of the Treasury.

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 42 U.S.C. § 911

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

2 U.S.C. § 900 — Statement of budget enforcement through

Page 232 TITLE 2—THE CONGRESS § 900 (2) Qualification An individual, organization, institution, or business may qualify for an award under this section only if such individual, organization, institution, or business— (A) is nominated to the Majority or Minor- ity Leader of the Senate or to the Speaker or the Minority Leader of the House of Rep- resentatives by a member of the Senate or the House of Representatives; (B) permits a rigorous evaluation by the Office of Technology Assessment of the way in which such individual, organization, insti- tution, or business has demonstrated excel- lence in promoting United States industrial competitiveness; and (C) meets such other requirements as the selection panel determines to be appropriate to achieve the objectives of this section. (3) Evaluation An evaluation of each nominee shall be con- ducted by the Office of Technology Assess- ment. The Office of Technology Assessment shall work with the selection panel to estab- lish appropriate procedures for evaluating nominees. (4) Panel review The selection panel shall review the Office of Technology Assessment’s evaluation of each nominee and may, based on those evaluations, recommend 1 award winner for each year for each category described in subsection (b)(1) to the Majority and Minority Leaders of the Sen- ate and the Speaker and the Minority Leader of the House of Representatives. (d) Presentation of award (1) In general The Majority and Minority Leaders of the Senate and the Speaker and the Minority Leader of the House of Representatives shall make the award to an individual and an orga- nization, institution, or business that has demonstrated excellence in promoting United States industrial competitiveness in the inter- national marketplace t

Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 2 U.S.C. § 900

Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. The source passage cites 2 U.S.C. § 900. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

22 U.S.C. § 2678 — Reduction in earmarks if appropriations

Page 1115 TITLE 22—FOREIGN RELATIONS AND INTERCOURSE § 2679a with travel of personnel outside the continental United States, including travel of dependents and transportation of personal effects, house- hold goods, or automobiles of such personnel shall be available for such expenses when any part of such travel or transportation begins in one fiscal year pursuant to travel orders issued in that year, notwithstanding the fact that such travel or transportation may not be completed during that same fiscal year. (Aug. 1, 1956, ch. 841, title I, § 10, 70 Stat. 891; re- numbered title I, Pub. L. 97–241, title II, § 202(a), Aug. 24, 1982, 96 Stat. 282.) Editorial Notes CODIFICATION Section was formerly classified to section 170o of Title 5 prior to the general revision and enactment of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, by Pub. L. 89–554, § 1, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 378. § 2678. Reduction in earmarks if appropriations are less than authorizations If the amount appropriated (or made available in the event of a sequestration order issued pur- suant to the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 (Public Law 99–177; [2 U.S.C. 900 et seq.])) for a fiscal year pursuant to any authorization of appropriations provided by an Act other than an appropriation Act is less than the authorization amount and a provision of that Act provides that a specified amount of the authorization amount shall be available only for a certain purpose, then the amount so specified shall be deemed to be reduced for that fiscal year to the amount which bears the same ratio to the specified amount as the amount ap- propriated (or made available in the event of se- questration) bears to the authorization amount. (Aug. 1, 1956, ch. 841, title I, §

Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 22 U.S.C. § 2678

Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.