Arkansas Legal Resource Navigator

23 U.S.C. § 130 — Railway-highway crossings

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

23 U.S.C. § 130 — Railway-highway crossings

**(a)** Subject to section 120 and subsection (b) of this section, the entire cost of construction of projects for the elimination of hazards of railway-highway crossings, including the separation or protection of grades at crossings, the reconstruction of existing railroad grade crossing structures, the relocation of highways to eliminate grade crossings, and projects at grade crossings to eliminate hazards posed by blocked grade crossings due to idling trains, may be paid from sums apportioned in accordance with [section 104 of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title23-section104&num=0&edition=prelim). In any case when the elimination of the hazards of a railway-highway crossing can be effected by the relocation of a portion of a railway at a cost estimated by the Secretary to be less than the cost of such elimination by one of the methods mentioned in the first sentence of this section, then the entire cost of such relocation project, subject to section 120 and subsection (b) of this section, may be paid from sums apportioned in accordance with [section 104 of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title23-section104&num=0&edition=prelim). **(b)** The Secretary may classify the various types of projects involved in the elimination of hazards of railway-highway crossings, and may set for each such classification a percentage of the costs of construction which shall be deemed to represent the net benefit to the railroad or railroads for the purpose of determining the railroad’s share of the cost of construction. The percentage so determined shall in no case exceed 10 per centum. The Secretary shall determine the appropriate classification of each project. **(c)** Any railroad involved in a proje

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 23 U.S.C. § 130

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.

Original supplied file — preserved unchanged

Download original Markdown file

File SHA-256: 0de237046225417e953c1f4086e4dc02ecccd5e6905539123ddd5633fad1dea6. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.

Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.

Open the recorded source website ↗

Record provenance

Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:record_usc_8ccb2900a05884c1ddd7a034
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code/title-23/section-130-railway-highway-crossings--692ab2448d.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: ae823ea3414f338493b1e25a319dd600da13541797ec2ddcbd31ec8df5112e02

Source location: Title 23, Chapter 1, § 130; chapter-001-federal-aid-highways.md

Stored source content

**(a)** Subject to section 120 and subsection (b) of this section, the entire cost of construction of projects for the elimination of hazards of railway-highway crossings, including the separation or protection of grades at crossings, the reconstruction of existing railroad grade crossing structures, the relocation of highways to eliminate grade crossings, and projects at grade crossings to eliminate hazards posed by blocked grade crossings due to idling trains, may be paid from sums apportioned in accordance with [section 104 of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title23-section104&num=0&edition=prelim). In any case when the elimination of the hazards of a railway-highway crossing can be effected by the relocation of a portion of a railway at a cost estimated by the Secretary to be less than the cost of such elimination by one of the methods mentioned in the first sentence of this section, then the entire cost of such relocation project, subject to section 120 and subsection (b) of this section, may be paid from sums apportioned in accordance with [section 104 of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title23-section104&num=0&edition=prelim). **(b)** The Secretary may classify the various types of projects involved in the elimination of hazards of railway-highway crossings, and may set for each such classification a percentage of the costs of construction which shall be deemed to represent the net benefit to the railroad or railroads for the purpose of determining the railroad’s share of the cost of construction. The percentage so determined shall in no case exceed 10 per centum. The Secretary shall determine the appropriate classification of each project. **(c)** Any railroad involved in a project for the elimination of hazards of railway-highway crossings paid for in whole or in part from sums made available for expenditure under this title, or prior Acts, shall be liable to the United States for the net benefit to the railroad determined under the classification of such project made pursuant to subsection (b) of this section. Such liability to the United States may be discharged by direct payment to the State transportation department of the State in which the project is located, in which case such payment shall be credited to the cost of the project. Such payment may consist in whole or in part of materials and labor furnished by the railroad in connection with the construction of such project. If any such railroad fails to discharge such liability within a six-month period after completion of the project, it shall be liable to the United States for its share of the cost, and the Secretary shall request the Attorney General to institute proceedings against such railroad for the recovery of the amount for which it is liable under this subsection. The Attorney General is authorized to bring such proceedings on behalf of the United States, in the appropriate district court of the United States, and the United States shall be entitled in such proceedings to recover such sums as it is considered and adjudged by the court that such railroad is liable for in the premises. Any amounts recovered by the United States under this subsection shall be credited to miscellaneous receipts. **(d) Survey and Schedule of Projects.—** Each State shall conduct and systematically maintain a survey of all highways to identify those railroad crossings which may require separation, relocation, or protective devices, and establish and implement a schedule of projects for this purpose. At a minimum, such a schedule shall provide signs for all railway-highway crossings. **(e) Funds for Railway-Highway Grade Crossings.—** (1) **In general.—** (A) *Set aside.—* — Before making an apportionment under section 104(b)(3) for a fiscal year, the Secretary shall set aside, from amounts made available to carry out the highway safety improvement program under section 148 for such fiscal year, for the elimination of hazards, the installation of protective devices at railway-highway crossings, the replacement of functionally obsolete warning devices, and as described in subparagraph (B), not less than $245,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2022 through 2026. (B) *Reducing trespassing fatalities and injuries.—* — A State may use funds set aside under subparagraph (A) for projects to reduce pedestrian fatalities and injuries from trespassing at grade crossings. (C) *Obligation availability.—* — Sums set aside each fiscal year under subparagraph (A) shall be available for obligation in the same manner as funds apportioned under section 104(b)(1). (2) **Special rule.—** — If a State demonstrates to the satisfaction of the Secretary that the State has met all its needs for installation of protective devices at railway-highway crossings, the State may use funds made available by this section for other highway safety improvement program purposes. **(f) Apportionment.—** (1) **Formula.—** — Fifty percent of the funds set aside to carry out this section pursuant to subsection (e)(1) shall be apportioned to the States in accordance with the formula set forth in section 104(b)(3)(A) as in effect on the day before the date of enactment of the MAP–21, and 50 percent of such funds shall be apportioned to the States in the ratio that total public railway-highway crossings in each State bears to the total of such crossings in all States. (2) **Minimum apportionment.—** — Notwithstanding paragraph (1), each State shall receive a minimum of one-half of 1 percent of the funds apportioned under paragraph (1). (3) **Federal share.—** — The Federal share payable on account of any project financed with funds set aside to carry out this section shall be 100 percent of the cost thereof. **(g) Annual Report.—** (1) **In general.—** — Not later than August 31 of each year, each State shall submit a report to the Administrator of the Federal Highway Administration that describes— (A) the progress being made to implement the railway-highway crossings program authorized under this section; and (B) the effectiveness of the improvements made as a result of such implementation. (2) **Contents.—** — Each report submitted pursuant to paragraph (1) shall contain an assessment of— (A) the costs of the various treatments employed by the State to implement the railway-highway crossings program; and (B) the effectiveness of such treatments, as measured by the accident experience at the locations that received such treatments. (3) **Coordination.—** — Not later than 30 days after the Federal Highway Administration’s acceptance of each report submitted pursuant to paragraph (1), the Administrator of the Federal Highway Administration shall make such report available to the Administrator of the Federal Railroad Administration. **(h) Use of Funds for Matching.—** Funds authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section may be used to provide a local government with funds to be used on a matching basis when State funds are available which may only be spent when the local government produces matching funds for the improvement of railway-highway crossings. **(i) Incentive Payments for At-Grade Crossing Closures.—** (1) **In general.—** — Notwithstanding any other provision of this section and subject to paragraphs (2) and (3), a State may, from sums available to the State under this section, make incentive payments to local governments in the State upon the permanent closure by such governments of public at-grade railway-highway crossings under the jurisdiction of such governments. (2) **Incentive payments by railroads.—** — A State may not make an incentive payment under paragraph (1) to a local government with respect to the closure of a crossing unless the railroad owning the tracks on which the crossing is located makes an incentive payment to the government with respect to the closure. (3) **Amount of state payment.—** — The amount of the incentive payment payable to a local government by a State under paragraph (1) with respect to a crossing may not exceed the lesser of— (A) the amount of the incentive payment paid to the government with respect to the crossing by the railroad concerned under paragraph (2); or (B) $100,000. (4) **Use of state payments.—** — A local government receiving an incentive payment from a State under paragraph (1) shall use the amount of the incentive payment for transportation safety improvements. **(j) Bicycle Safety.—** In carrying out projects under this section, a State shall take into account bicycle safety. **(k) Expenditure of Funds.—** Not more than 8 percent of funds apportioned to a State to carry out this section may be used by the State for compilation and analysis of data in support of activities carried out under subsection (g). **(l) National Crossing Inventory.—** (1) **Initial reporting of crossing information.—** — Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of the Rail Safety Improvement Act of 2008 or within 6 months of a new crossing becoming operational, whichever occurs later, each State shall report to the Secretary of Transportation current information, including information about warning devices and signage, as specified by the Secretary, concerning each previously unreported public crossing located within its borders. (2) **Periodic updating of crossing information.—** — On a periodic basis beginning not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of the Rail Safety Improvement Act of 2008 and on or before September 30 of every year thereafter, or as otherwise specified by the Secretary, each State shall report to the Secretary current information, including information about warning devices and signage, as specified by the Secretary, concerning each public crossing located within its borders.

Cross-references

Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

23 U.S.C. § 307 — Repealed. Pub. L. 105–178, title V, § 5119(b), June 9, 1998, 112 Stat. 452]

### Statutory Notes Section, Pub. L. 85–767, Aug. 27, 1958, 72 Stat. 913; Pub. L. 87–866, § 11, Oct. 23, 1962, 76 Stat. 1148; Pub. L. 88–157, § 6, Oct. 24, 1963, 77 Stat. 277; Pub. L. 89–564, title I, § 103, Sept. 9, 1966, 80 Stat. 735; Pub. L. 91–605, title I, §§ 115(c), 126, 136(c), Dec. 31, 1970, 84 Stat. 1723, 1729, 1735; Pub. L. 93–87, title I, § 151, Aug. 13, 1973, 87 Stat. 276; Pub. L. 96–470, title I, § 112(b)(2), Oct. 19, 1980, 94 Stat. 2239; Pub. L. 97–424, title I, §§ 156(a), (b), (d), 160(a), Jan. 6, 1983, 96 Stat. 2134, 2135; Pub. L. 100–17, title I, §§ 128, 129, 133(b)(17), Apr. 2, 1987, 101 Stat. 167, 169, 172; Pub. L. 102–240, title VI, §§ 6001, 6005, Dec. 18, 1991, 105 Stat. 2162, 2170; Pub. L. 103–429, § 3(10), Oct. 31, 1994, 108 Stat. 4378; Pub. L. 104–59, title III, § 325(d), Nov. 28, 1995, 109 Stat. 592, related to research and planning. #### Intelligent Transportation Systems Pub. L. 102–240, title VI, pt. B, Dec. 18, 1991, 105 Stat. 2189, as amended by Pub. L. 102–388, title IV, § 404, Oct. 6, 1992, 106 Stat. 1564; Pub. L. 104–59, title III, § 338(a), (b), (c)(2), Nov. 28, 1995, 109 Stat. 603, 604; Pub. L. 105–130, § 5(d), Dec. 1, 1997, 111 Stat. 2557, related to Intelligent Transportation Systems Act of 1991, including provisions relating to establishment and scope of program, general authorities and requirements, strategic plan, implementation, and report to Congress, technical, planning, and operational testing project assistance, applications of technology, commercial motor vehicle safety technology, funding, and definitions, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 105–178, title V, § 5213, June 9, 1998, 112 Stat. 463. See Pub. L. 105–178, title V, §§ 5201–5213, June 9, 1998, 112 Stat. 452–463, set out as a note under [section 502 of this title](https://

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 23 U.S.C. § 307

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

23 U.S.C. § 120 — Federal share payable

**(a) Interstate System Projects.—** (1) **In general.—** — Except as otherwise provided in this chapter, the Federal share payable on account of any project on the Interstate System (including a project to add high occupancy vehicle lanes and a project to add auxiliary lanes but excluding a project to add any other lanes) shall be 90 percent of the total cost thereof, plus a percentage of the remaining 10 percent of such cost in any State containing unappropriated and unreserved public lands and nontaxable Indian lands, individual and tribal, exceeding 5 percent of the total area of all lands therein, equal to the percentage that the area of such lands in such State is of its total area; except that such Federal share payable on any project in any State shall not exceed 95 percent of the total cost of such project. (2) **State-determined lower federal share.—** — In the case of any project subject to paragraph (1), a State may determine a lower Federal share than the Federal share determined under such paragraph. **(b) Other Projects.—** Except as otherwise provided in this title, the Federal share payable on account of any project or activity carried out under this title (other than a project subject to subsection (a)) shall be— (1) 80 percent of the cost thereof, except that in the case of any State containing nontaxable Indian lands, individual and tribal, and public domain lands (both reserved and unreserved) exclusive of national forests and national parks and monuments, exceeding 5 percent of the total area of all lands therein, the Federal share, for purposes of this chapter, shall be increased by a percentage of the remaining cost equal to the percentage that the area of all such lands in such State, is of its total area; or (2) 80 percent of the cost ther

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 23 U.S.C. § 120

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

23 U.S.C. § 104 — Apportionment

**(a) Administrative Expenses.—** (1) **In general.—** — There is authorized to be appropriated from the Highway Trust Fund (other than the Mass Transit Account) to be made available to the Secretary for administrative expenses of the Federal Highway Administration— (A) $490,964,697 for fiscal year 2022; (B) $500,783,991 for fiscal year 2023; (C) $510,799,671 for fiscal year 2024; (D) $521,015,664 for fiscal year 2025; and (E) $531,435,977 for fiscal year 2026. (2) **Purposes.—** — The amounts authorized to be appropriated by this subsection shall be used— (A) to administer the provisions of law to be funded from appropriations for the Federal-aid highway program and programs authorized under chapter 2; (B) to make transfers of such sums as the Secretary determines to be appropriate to the Appalachian Regional Commission for administrative activities associated with the Appalachian development highway system; and (C) to reimburse, as appropriate, the Office of Inspector General of the Department of Transportation for the conduct of annual audits of financial statements in accordance with [section 3521 of title 31](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title31-section3521&num=0&edition=prelim). (3) **Availability.—** — The amounts made available under paragraph (1) shall remain available until expended. **(b) Division Among Programs of State’s Share of Base Apportionment.—** The Secretary shall distribute the amount of the base apportionment apportioned to a State for a fiscal year under subsection (c) among the national highway performance program, the surface transportation block grant program, the highway safety improvement program, the congestion mitigation and air quality improvement program, the national highway fr

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 23 U.S.C. § 104

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

5 U.S.C. § 5313 — Positions at level II

Level II of the Executive Schedule applies to the following positions, for which the annual rate of basic pay shall be the rate determined with respect to such level under chapter 11 of title 2, as adjusted by [section 5318 of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title5-section5318&num=0&edition=prelim):

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 5 U.S.C. § 5313

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

23 U.S.C. § 101 — Definitions and declaration of policy

**(a) Definitions.—** In this title, the following definitions apply: (1) **Apportionment.—** — The term “apportionment” includes unexpended apportionments made under prior authorization laws. (2) **Asset management.—** — The term “asset management” means a strategic and systematic process of operating, maintaining, and improving physical assets, with a focus on both engineering and economic analysis based upon quality information, to identify a structured sequence of maintenance, preservation, repair, rehabilitation, and replacement actions that will achieve and sustain a desired state of good repair over the lifecycle of the assets at minimum practicable cost. (3) **Carpool project.—** — The term “carpool project” means any project to encourage the use of carpools and vanpools, including provision of carpooling opportunities to the elderly and individuals with disabilities, systems for locating potential riders and informing them of carpool opportunities, acquiring vehicles for carpool use, designating existing highway lanes as preferential carpool highway lanes, providing related traffic control devices, designating existing facilities for use for preferential parking for carpools, and real-time ridesharing projects, such as projects where drivers, using an electronic transfer of funds, recover costs directly associated with the trip provided through the use of location technology to quantify those direct costs, subject to the condition that the cost recovered does not exceed the cost of the trip provided. (4) **Construction.—** — The term “construction” means the supervising, inspecting, actual building, and incurrence of all costs incidental to the construction or reconstruction of a highway or any project eligible for assistance under this title, including bon

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 23 U.S.C. § 101

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

23 U.S.C. § 401 — Authority of the Secretary

The Secretary is authorized and directed to assist and cooperate with other Federal departments and agencies, State and local governments, private industry, and other interested parties, to increase highway safety. For the purposes of this chapter, the term “State” means any one of the fifty States, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands.

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 23 U.S.C. § 401

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Incoming connection: Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

49 U.S.C. § 20167 — Reports on highway-rail grade crossing safety

**(a) Report.—** Not later than 4 years after the date by which States are required to submit State highway-rail grade crossing action plans under section 11401(b) of the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act ([49 U.S.C. 22907](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title49-section22907&num=0&edition=prelim) note), the Administrator of the Federal Railroad Administration, in consultation with the Administrator of the Federal Highway Administration, shall submit a report to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives that summarizes the State highway-rail grade crossing action plans, including— (1) an analysis and evaluation of each State railway-highway crossings program under [section 130 of title 23](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title23-section130&num=0&edition=prelim), including— (A) compliance with section 11401 of the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act and [section 130(g) of title 23](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title23-section130/g&num=0&edition=prelim); and (B) the specific strategies identified by each State to improve safety at highway-rail grade crossings, including crossings with multiple accidents or incidents; (2) the progress of each State in implementing its State highway-rail grade crossings action plan; (3) the number of highway-rail grade crossing projects undertaken pursuant to [section 130 of title 23](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title23-section130&num=0&edition=prelim), including the distribution of such projects by cost range, road system, nature of treatment, and subsequent accident experience at

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 49 U.S.C. § 20167

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Incoming connection: Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

49 U.S.C. § 22705 — Content

**(a) In General.—** Each State rail plan shall, at a minimum, contain the following: (1) An inventory of the existing overall rail transportation system and rail services and facilities within the State and an analysis of the role of rail transportation within the State’s surface transportation system. (2) A review of all rail lines within the State, including proposed high-speed rail corridors and significant rail line segments not currently in service. (3) A statement of the State’s passenger rail service objectives, including minimum service levels, for rail transportation routes in the State. (4) A general analysis of rail’s transportation, economic, and environmental impacts in the State, including congestion mitigation, trade and economic development, air quality, land-use, energy-use, and community impacts. (5) A long-range rail investment program for current and future freight and passenger infrastructure in the State that meets the requirements of subsection (b). (6) A statement of public financing issues for rail projects and service in the State, including a list of current and prospective public capital and operating funding resources, public subsidies, State taxation, and other financial policies relating to rail infrastructure development. (7) An identification of rail infrastructure issues within the State that reflects consultation with all relevant stakeholders. (8) A review of major passenger and freight intermodal rail connections and facilities within the State, including seaports, and prioritized options to maximize service integration and efficiency between rail and other modes of transportation within the State. (9) A review of publicly funded projects within the State to improve rail transportation safety and security, including all maj

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 49 U.S.C. § 22705

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Incoming connection: Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

49 U.S.C. § 22907 — Consolidated rail infrastructure and safety improvements

**(a) General Authority.—** The Secretary may make grants under this section to an eligible recipient to assist in financing the cost of improving passenger and freight rail transportation systems in terms of safety, efficiency, or reliability. **(b) Eligible Recipients.—** The following entities are eligible to receive a grant under this section: (1) A State (including the District of Columbia). (2) A group of States. (3) An Interstate Compact. (4) A public agency or publicly chartered authority established by 1 or more States. (5) A political subdivision of a State. (6) Amtrak or another rail carrier that provides intercity rail passenger transportation (as rail carrier and intercity rail passenger transportation are defined in section 24102). (7) A Class II railroad or Class III railroad (as those terms are defined in section 20102). (8) An association representing 1 or more railroads described in paragraph (7). (9) A federally recognized Indian Tribe. (10) Any rail carrier or rail equipment manufacturer in partnership with at least 1 of the entities described in paragraphs (1) through (5). (11) The Transportation Research Board and any entity with which it contracts in the development of rail-related research, including cooperative research programs. (12) A University transportation center engaged in rail-related research. (13) A non-profit labor organization representing a class or craft of employees of rail carriers or rail carrier contractors. **(c) Eligible Projects.—** The following projects are eligible to receive grants under this section: (1) Deployment of railroad safety technology, including positive train control and rail integrity inspection systems. (2) A capital project as defined in section 22901(2), except that a project shall not be

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 49 U.S.C. § 22907

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Incoming connection: Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

23 U.S.C. § 130 — Railway-highway crossings

Page 156 TITLE 23—HIGHWAYS § 130 ‘‘(10) INTERSTATE SYSTEM DEFINED.—In this sub- section, the term ‘Interstate System’ has the meaning such term has under section 101 of title 23, United States Code.’’ CONTINUATION OF EXISTING AGREEMENTS Pub. L. 102–240, title I, § 1012(d), Dec. 18, 1991, 105 Stat. 1939, provided that: ‘‘Unless modified under section 129(a)(6) [now 129(a)(5)] of such title [this title], as amended by subsection (a) of this section, agreements entered into under section 119(e) or 129 of such title be- fore the effective date of this title [Dec. 18, 1991] and in effect on the day before such effective date shall con- tinue in effect on and after such effective date in ac- cordance with the provisions of such agreement and such section 119(e) or 129.’’ CONSTRUCTION OF FERRY BOATS AND FERRY TERMINAL FACILITIES Pub. L. 102–240, title I, § 1064, Dec. 18, 1991, 105 Stat. 2005, as amended by Pub. L. 102–388, title III, § 332, Oct. 6, 1992, 106 Stat. 1550; Pub. L. 105–178, title I, § 1207(b), June 9, 1998, 112 Stat. 185, which directed the Secretary to carry out a program for construction of ferry boats and ferry terminal facilities in accordance with section 129(c) of this title, was repealed by Pub. L. 109–59, title I, § 1801(c), Aug. 10, 2005, 119 Stat. 1456. See section 147 of this title. STUDY TO DETERMINE EXTENT OF BONDED INDEBTED- NESS OF STATES FOR CONSTRUCTION OF TOLL ROADS INCORPORATED INTO INTERSTATE SYSTEM Pub. L. 95–599, title I, § 164, Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2721, as amended by Pub. L. 96–106, § 16, Nov. 19, 1979, 93 Stat. 798, directed Secretary of Transportation to report not later than July 1, 1980, respecting extent of outstanding bonded indebtedness for each State as of Jan. 1, 1979, incurred by each State or public a

Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 23 U.S.C. § 130

Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.