Arkansas Legal Resource Navigator

33 U.S.C. § 2320 — Mitigation banks and in-lieu fee arrangements

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

33 U.S.C. § 2320 — Mitigation banks and in-lieu fee arrangements

(1) **In general** — Not later than 180 days after December 16, 2016, the Secretary shall issue implementation guidance that provides for the consideration in water resources development feasibility studies of the entire amount of potential in-kind credits available at mitigation banks approved by the Secretary and in-lieu fee programs with an approved service area that includes the location of the projected impacts of the water resources development project. (2) **Requirements** — All potential mitigation bank and in-lieu fee credits that meet the criteria under paragraph (1) shall be considered a reasonable alternative for planning purposes if— (A) the applicable mitigation bank— (i) has an approved mitigation banking instrument; and (ii) has completed a functional analysis of the potential credits using the approved Corps of Engineers certified habitat assessment model specific to the region; and (B) the Secretary determines that the use of such banks or in-lieu fee programs provide reasonable assurance that the statutory (and regulatory) mitigation requirements for a water resources development project are met, including monitoring or demonstrating mitigation success. (3) **Effect** — Nothing in this subsection— (A) modifies or alters any requirement for a water resources development project to comply with applicable laws or regulations, including [section 2283 of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title33-section2283&num=0&edition=prelim); or (B) shall be construed as to limit mitigation alternatives or require the use of mitigation banks or in-lieu fee programs.

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 33 U.S.C. § 2320

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.

Original supplied file — preserved unchanged

Download original Markdown file

File SHA-256: 4aa9c0c0723bce450ad254cce1cbba06144392c9342e4562f7939db3605952f9. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.

Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.

Open the recorded source website ↗

Record provenance

Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:record_usc_8a67399b997a99d99e7f81fb
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code/title-33/section-2320-mitigation-banks-and-in-lieu-fee-arrangements--322fc83c36.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: 7697ff07955fb928cd93ba97986a77679b3cd299549d107c77a893b9b1c5c882

Source location: Title 33, Chapter 36, § 2320; chapter-036-water-resources-development.md

Stored source content

(1) **In general** — Not later than 180 days after December 16, 2016, the Secretary shall issue implementation guidance that provides for the consideration in water resources development feasibility studies of the entire amount of potential in-kind credits available at mitigation banks approved by the Secretary and in-lieu fee programs with an approved service area that includes the location of the projected impacts of the water resources development project. (2) **Requirements** — All potential mitigation bank and in-lieu fee credits that meet the criteria under paragraph (1) shall be considered a reasonable alternative for planning purposes if— (A) the applicable mitigation bank— (i) has an approved mitigation banking instrument; and (ii) has completed a functional analysis of the potential credits using the approved Corps of Engineers certified habitat assessment model specific to the region; and (B) the Secretary determines that the use of such banks or in-lieu fee programs provide reasonable assurance that the statutory (and regulatory) mitigation requirements for a water resources development project are met, including monitoring or demonstrating mitigation success. (3) **Effect** — Nothing in this subsection— (A) modifies or alters any requirement for a water resources development project to comply with applicable laws or regulations, including [section 2283 of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title33-section2283&num=0&edition=prelim); or (B) shall be construed as to limit mitigation alternatives or require the use of mitigation banks or in-lieu fee programs.

Cross-references

Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

33 U.S.C. § 2201 — Prior project authorization

In any case in which a project under the jurisdiction of the Secretary is budgeted under a different business line than the business line under which the project was originally authorized, the Secretary shall ensure that the project is carried out in accordance with any requirements that apply to the business line under which the project was originally authorized.

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 33 U.S.C. § 2201

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

33 U.S.C. § 2283 — Review of resiliency assessments

**(a) Resiliency assessment** (1) **In general** — Not later than 180 days after December 27, 2020, and in conjunction with the development of procedures under [section 1962–4 of title 42](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title42-section1962–4&num=0&edition=prelim), the Secretary is directed to review, and where appropriate, revise the existing planning guidance documents and regulations of the Corps of Engineers on the assessment of the effects of sea level rise or inland flooding on future water resources development projects to ensure that such guidance documents and regulations are based on the best available, peer-reviewed science and data on the current and future effects of sea level rise or inland flooding on relevant communities. (2) **Coordination** — In carrying out this subsection, the Secretary shall— (A) coordinate the review with the Engineer Research and Development Center, other Federal and State agencies, and other relevant entities; and (B) to the maximum extent practicable and where appropriate, utilize data provided to the Secretary by such agencies. **(b) Assessment of benefits from addressing sea level rise and inland flooding resiliency in feasibility reports** (1) **In general** — Upon the request of a non-Federal interest, in carrying out a feasibility study for a project for flood risk mitigation, hurricane and storm damage risk reduction, or ecosystem restoration under [section 2282 of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title33-section2282&num=0&edition=prelim), the Secretary shall consider whether the need for the project is predicated upon or exacerbated by conditions related to sea level rise or inland flooding. (2) **Addressing sea level rise and inland flooding

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 33 U.S.C. § 2283

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

33 U.S.C. § 2320 — Protection of recreational and commercial

Page 808 TITLE 33—NAVIGATION AND NAVIGABLE WATERS § 2320 ‘‘(B) not later than 2 years after the date of enact- ment of this Act, submit to Congress a report that— ‘‘(i) summarizes the results of the audit required by subparagraph (A); ‘‘(ii) includes an assessment of whether existing practices for managing and reviewing project oper- ations could result in greater efficiencies that would enable the Corps of Engineers to better pre- pare for, contain, and respond to flood, storm, and drought conditions; and ‘‘(iii) includes recommendations for improving the review of project operations to improve the effi- ciency and effectiveness of such operations and to better achieve authorized purposes while enhancing overall project benefits. ‘‘(4) INTERAGENCY AND COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS.— The Secretary may enter into interagency agreements with other Federal agencies and cooperative agree- ments with non-Federal entities to carry out this sub- section and reviews of project operations or activities resulting from those reviews. ‘‘(5) FUNDING.— ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary may use to carry out this subsection, including any reviews of project operations identified in the plan developed under paragraph (2)(B)(ii)(I)(dd), amounts made available to the Secretary. ‘‘(B) FUNDING FROM OTHER SOURCES.—The Secretary may accept and expend amounts from non-Federal entities and other Federal agencies to carry out this subsection and reviews of project operations or ac- tivities resulting from those reviews. ‘‘(6) EFFECT OF SUBSECTION.— ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Nothing in this subsection changes the authorized purpose of any Corps of Engi- neers dam or reservoir. ‘‘(B) ADMINISTRATION.—The Secretary may carry out any recommendations and activities under this subsection pursu

Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 33 U.S.C. § 2320

Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.