Browse Arkansas Code titles and sections
42 U.S.C. § 1962–2 — Prohibition on Great Lakes diversions
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a) Congressional findings and declarations** The Congress finds and declares that—
(1) the Great Lakes are a most important natural resource to the eight Great Lakes States and two Canadian provinces, providing water supply for domestic and industrial use, clean energy through hydropower production, an efficient transportation mode for moving products into and out of the Great Lakes region, and recreational uses for millions of United States and Canadian citizens;
(2) the Great Lakes need to be carefully managed and protected to meet current and future needs within the Great Lakes basin and Canadian provinces;
(3) any new diversions of Great Lakes water for use outside of the Great Lakes basin will have significant economic and environmental impacts, adversely affecting the use of this resource by the Great Lakes States and Canadian provinces; and
(4) four of the Great Lakes are international waters and are defined as boundary waters in the Boundary Waters Treaty of 1909 between the United States and Canada, and as such any new diversion of Great Lakes water in the United States would affect the relations of the Government of the United States with the Government of Canada.
**(b) Congressional declaration of purpose and policy** It is therefore declared to be the purpose and policy of the Congress in this section—
(1) to take immediate action to protect the limited quantity of water available from the Great Lakes system for use by the Great Lakes States and in accordance with the Boundary Waters Treaty of 1909;
(2) to encourage the Great Lakes States, in consultation with the Provinces of Ontario and Quebec, to develop and implement a mechanism that provides a common conservation standard embodying the principles of water conservation and resource improvement
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 42 U.S.C. § 1962–2
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.
Original supplied file — preserved unchanged
Download original Markdown file
File SHA-256: 3cef9d8c20808e0fd40e290103eb40e1677a9be7e233a1f81d7f51008af809c1. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.
Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.
Record provenance
Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:record_usc_8588f541cd73880ba749fa7d
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code/title-42/section-19622-prohibition-on-great-lakes-diversions--f053ecec50.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: 93194e42ad90ffb1ad381f543a74fce9c3f30d9d5b49196c73206a593fae2236
Source location: Title 42, Chapter 19B, § 1962–2; chapter-19b-water-resources-planning.md
Stored source content
**(a) Congressional findings and declarations** The Congress finds and declares that—
(1) the Great Lakes are a most important natural resource to the eight Great Lakes States and two Canadian provinces, providing water supply for domestic and industrial use, clean energy through hydropower production, an efficient transportation mode for moving products into and out of the Great Lakes region, and recreational uses for millions of United States and Canadian citizens;
(2) the Great Lakes need to be carefully managed and protected to meet current and future needs within the Great Lakes basin and Canadian provinces;
(3) any new diversions of Great Lakes water for use outside of the Great Lakes basin will have significant economic and environmental impacts, adversely affecting the use of this resource by the Great Lakes States and Canadian provinces; and
(4) four of the Great Lakes are international waters and are defined as boundary waters in the Boundary Waters Treaty of 1909 between the United States and Canada, and as such any new diversion of Great Lakes water in the United States would affect the relations of the Government of the United States with the Government of Canada.
**(b) Congressional declaration of purpose and policy** It is therefore declared to be the purpose and policy of the Congress in this section—
(1) to take immediate action to protect the limited quantity of water available from the Great Lakes system for use by the Great Lakes States and in accordance with the Boundary Waters Treaty of 1909;
(2) to encourage the Great Lakes States, in consultation with the Provinces of Ontario and Quebec, to develop and implement a mechanism that provides a common conservation standard embodying the principles of water conservation and resource improvement for making decisions concerning the withdrawal and use of water from the Great Lakes Basin;
(3) to prohibit any diversion of Great Lakes water by any State, Federal agency, or private entity for use outside the Great Lakes basin unless such diversion is approved by the Governor of each of the Great Lakes States; and
(4) to prohibit any Federal agency from undertaking any studies that would involve the transfer of Great Lakes water for any purpose for use outside the Great Lakes basin.
**(c) “Great Lakes State” defined** As used in this section, the term “Great Lakes State” means each of the States of Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio, Pennsylvania, New York, and Wisconsin.
**(d) Approval by Governors for diversion of water** No water shall be diverted or exported from any portion of the Great Lakes within the United States, or from any tributary within the United States of any of the Great Lakes, for use outside the Great Lakes basin unless such diversion or export is approved by the Governor of each of the Great Lake 11 So in original. Probably should be “Lakes”. States.
**(e) Approval of Governors for diversion studies** No Federal agency may undertake any study, or expend any Federal funds to contract for any study, of the feasibility of diverting water from any portion of the Great Lakes within the United States, or from any tributary within the United States of any of the Great Lakes, for use outside the Great Lakes basin, unless such study or expenditure is approved by the Governor of each of the Great Lakes States. The prohibition of the preceding sentence shall not apply to any study or data collection effort performed by the Corps of Engineers or other Federal agency under the direction of the International Joint Commission in accordance with the Boundary Waters Treaty of 1909.
**(f) Previously authorized diversions** This section shall not apply to any diversion of water from any of the Great Lakes which is authorized on November 17, 1986.
Cross-references
Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a) Definitions** In this section:
(1) **Indian tribe** — The terms “Indian tribe” and “Indian Tribe” have the meanings given the terms “Indian tribe” has the meaning given the term 11 So in original. in [section 5304 of title 25](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title25-section5304&num=0&edition=prelim).
(2) **Inter-tribal consortium** — The term “inter-tribal consortium” has the meaning given the term in [section 3202 of title 25](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title25-section3202&num=0&edition=prelim).
(3) **Tribal organization** — The term “Tribal organization” has the meaning given the term in [section 5304 of title 25](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title25-section5304&num=0&edition=prelim).
**(b) Program**
(1) **In general** — In cooperation with Indian tribes, inter-tribal consortiums, Tribal organizations, and the heads of other Federal agencies, the Secretary may carry out water-related planning activities, or activities relating to the study, design, and construction of water resources development projects, that—
(A) will substantially benefit Indian tribes, inter-tribal consortiums, or Tribal organizations; and
(B) are located primarily within Indian country (as defined in [section 1151 of title 18](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title18-section1151&num=0&edition=prelim), and including lands that are within the jurisdictional area of an Oklahoma Indian tribe, as determined by the Secretary of the Interior, and are recognized by the Secretary of the Interior as eligible for trust land status under part 151 of title 25, Code of Federal Regulations) or in proximity to Alaska Native villages.
(2) **Authorized activities** — An activ
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 33 U.S.C. § 2281
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Incoming connection: Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a) Model development** The Secretary, in collaboration with other Federal and State agencies, National Laboratories, and nonprofit research institutions (including institutions of higher education and centers and laboratories focused on economics or water resources), shall develop, update, and maintain economic, hydraulic, and hydrologic models, including models for compound flooding, for use in the planning, design formulation, modification, and operation of water resources development projects and water resources planning.
**(b) Coordination and use of models and data** In carrying out subsection (a), to the extent practicable, the Secretary shall—
(1) work with the non-Federal interest for a water resources development project to identify existing relevant economic, hydraulic, and hydrologic models and data;
(2) utilize, where appropriate, economic, hydraulic, and hydrologic models and data provided to the Secretary by the agencies, laboratories, and institutions described in subsection (a); and
(3) upon written request by a non-Federal interest for a project, provide to the non-Federal interest draft or working economic, hydraulic, and hydrologic models, and any data generated by such models with respect to the project, not later than 30 days after receiving such request; and
(4) in accordance with [section 2342 of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title33-section2342&num=0&edition=prelim), make final economic, hydraulic, and hydrologic models, and any data generated by such models, available to the public, as quickly as practicable, but not later than 30 days after receiving a written request for such models or data.
**(c) Limitation** Nothing in this section may be construed to compel or authorize the disclosure of d
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 33 U.S.C. § 2283b
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Incoming connection: Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a) In general** The Secretary may carry out studies and projects to—
(1) reduce flood and hurricane and storm damage hazards; or
(2) restore the natural functions and values of rivers and shorelines throughout the United States.
**(b) Studies and projects**
(1) **Authority**
(A) *Studies* — In carrying out subsection (a), the Secretary may carry out studies to identify appropriate measures for—
(i) the reduction of flood and hurricane and storm damage hazards, including measures for erosion mitigation and bank stabilization; or
(ii) the conservation and restoration of the natural functions and values of rivers and shorelines.
(B) *Projects* — Subject to subsection (f)(2), in carrying out subsection (a), the Secretary may design and implement projects described in subsection (a).
(2) **Consultation and coordination** — The studies and projects carried out under this section shall be conducted, to the maximum extent practicable, in consultation and coordination with the Federal Emergency Management Agency and other appropriate Federal agencies, and in consultation and coordination with appropriate State and local agencies and tribes.
(3) **Nonstructural approaches** — The studies and projects shall emphasize, to the maximum extent practicable and appropriate, nonstructural approaches to preventing or reducing flood and hurricane and storm damages, including the use of natural features or nature-based features.
(4) **Participation** — The studies and projects shall be conducted, to the maximum extent practicable, in cooperation with State and local agencies and tribes to ensure the coordination of local flood and hurricane and storm damage reduction or riverine, shoreline, and wetland restoration studies with projects that conserve, restore, and m
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 33 U.S.C. § 2335
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Incoming connection: Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.