Browse Arkansas Code titles and sections

10 U.S.C. § 2228 — Office of Corrosion Policy and Oversight

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

10 U.S.C. § 2228 — Office of Corrosion Policy and Oversight

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 10 U.S.C. § 2228

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.

Original supplied file — preserved unchanged

Download original Markdown file

File SHA-256: d25222b416a5ebc83d97bec8a18b528169a092512fd5317ee9422eb261d91fa2. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.

Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.

Open the recorded source website ↗

Record provenance

Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:record_usc_74be993c4ab2db50e2d681a6
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code/title-10/section-2228-office-of-corrosion-policy-and-oversight--14d5dcb2f5.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: ffec1b27497517ba03fea0109e950cf9ca8391ae020943c092ba609c79df7103

Source location: Title 10, Chapter 131, § 2228; chapter-131-planning-and-coordination.md

Stored source content

**(a) Office and Director.—** (1) There is an Office of Corrosion Policy and Oversight within the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment. (2) The Office shall be headed by a Director of Corrosion Policy and Oversight, who shall be assigned to such position by the Under Secretary from among civilian employees of the Department of Defense with the qualifications described in paragraph (3). The Director is responsible in the Department of Defense to the Secretary of Defense (after the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment) for the prevention and mitigation of corrosion of the military equipment and infrastructure of the Department of Defense. (3) In order to qualify to be assigned to the position of Director, an individual shall— (A) have management expertise in, and professional experience with, corrosion project and policy implementation, including an understanding of the effects of corrosion policies on infrastructure; research, development, test, and evaluation; and maintenance; and (B) have an understanding of Department of Defense budget formulation and execution, policy formulation, and planning and program requirements. (4) The Secretary of Defense shall designate the position of Director as a critical acquisition position under [section 1731 of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title10-section1731&num=0&edition=prelim). **(b) Duties.—** (1) The Director of Corrosion Policy and Oversight (in this section referred to as the “Director”) shall oversee and coordinate efforts throughout the Department of Defense to prevent and mitigate corrosion of the military equipment and infrastructure of the Department. The duties under this paragraph shall include the duties specified in paragraphs (2) through (5). (2) The Director shall develop and recommend any policy guidance on the prevention and mitigation of corrosion to be issued by the Secretary of Defense. (3) The Director shall review the programs and funding levels proposed by the Secretary of each military department during the annual internal Department of Defense budget review process as those programs and funding proposals relate to programs and funding for the prevention and mitigation of corrosion and shall submit to the Secretary of Defense recommendations regarding those programs and proposed funding levels. (4) The Director shall provide oversight and coordination of the efforts within the Department of Defense to prevent or mitigate corrosion during— (A) the design, acquisition, and maintenance of military equipment; and (B) the design, construction, and maintenance of infrastructure. (5) The Director shall monitor acquisition practices within the Department of Defense— (A) to ensure that the use of corrosion prevention technologies and the application of corrosion prevention treatments are fully considered during research and development in the acquisition process; and (B) to ensure that, to the extent determined appropriate for each acquisition program, such technologies and treatments are incorporated into that program, particularly during the engineering and design phases of the acquisition process. (6) The Director shall ensure that contractors of the Department of Defense carrying out activities for the prevention and mitigation of corrosion of the military equipment and infrastructure of the Department of Defense employ for such activities a substantial number of individuals who have completed, or who are currently enrolled in, a qualified training program. **(c) Additional Authorities for Director.—** The Director is authorized to— (1) develop, update, and coordinate corrosion training with the Defense Acquisition University; (2) participate in the process within the Department of Defense for the development of relevant directives and instructions; (3) interact directly with the corrosion prevention industry, trade associations, other government corrosion prevention agencies, academic research and educational institutions, and scientific organizations engaged in corrosion prevention, including the National Academy of Sciences; and (4) require that any training or professional development activities for military personnel or civilian employees of the Department of Defense for the prevention and mitigation of corrosion of the military equipment and infrastructure of the Department of Defense are conducted under a qualified training program that trains and certifies individuals in meeting corrosion control standards that are recognized industry-wide. **(d) Long-Term Strategy.—** (1) The Secretary of Defense shall develop and implement a long-term strategy to reduce corrosion and the effects of corrosion on the military equipment and infrastructure of the Department of Defense. (2) The strategy under paragraph (1) shall include the following: (A) Expansion of the emphasis on corrosion prevention and mitigation within the Department of Defense to include coverage of infrastructure. (B) Application uniformly throughout the Department of Defense of requirements and criteria for the testing and certification of new corrosion-prevention technologies for equipment and infrastructure with similar characteristics, similar missions, or similar operating environments. (C) Implementation of programs, including supporting databases, to ensure that a focused and coordinated approach is taken throughout the Department of Defense to collect, review, validate, and distribute information on proven methods and products that are relevant to the prevention of corrosion of military equipment and infrastructure. (D) Establishment of a coordinated research and development program for the prevention and mitigation of corrosion for new and existing military equipment and infrastructure that includes a plan to transition new corrosion prevention technologies into operational systems, including through the establishment of memoranda of agreement, joint funding agreements, public-private partnerships, university research and education centers, and other cooperative research agreements. (3) The strategy shall include, for the matters specified in paragraph (2), the following: (A) Policy guidance. (B) Performance measures and milestones. (C) An assessment of the necessary personnel and funding necessary to accomplish the long-term strategy. **(e) Report.—** (1) For each budget for a fiscal year, beginning with the budget for fiscal year 2009 and ending with the budget for fiscal year 2022, the Secretary of Defense shall submit, with the defense budget materials, a report on the following: (A) Funding requirements for the long-term strategy developed under subsection (d). (B) The estimated composite return on investment achieved by implementing the strategy, and documented in the assessments by the Department of Defense of completed corrosion projects and activities. (C) For the fiscal year covered by the report and the preceding fiscal year, the funds requested in the budget compared to the funding requirements. (D) If the full amount of funding requirements is not requested in the budget, the reasons for not including the full amount and a description of the impact on readiness, logistics, and safety of not fully funding required corrosion prevention and mitigation activities. (E) For the fiscal year preceding the fiscal year covered by the report, the amount of funds requested in the budget for each project or activity described in subsection (d) compared to the funding requirements for the project or activity. (F) For the fiscal year preceding the fiscal year covered by the report, a description of the specific amount of funds used for military corrosion projects, the Technical Corrosion Collaboration program, and other corrosion-related activities. (2) (A) Each report under this section shall include, in an annex to the report, a summary of the most recent report required by subparagraph (B). (B) Not later than December 31 of each year, through December 31, 2020, the corrosion control and prevention executive of a military department shall submit to the Director of Corrosion Policy and Oversight a report containing recommendations pertaining to the corrosion control and prevention program of the military department. Such report shall include recommendations for the funding levels necessary for the executive to carry out the duties of the executive under this section. The report required under this subparagraph shall— (i) provide a summary of key accomplishments, goals, and objectives of the corrosion control and prevention program of the military department; and (ii) include the performance measures used to ensure that the corrosion control and prevention program achieved the goals and objectives described in clause (i). **(f) Definitions.—** In this section: (1) The term “corrosion” means the deterioration of a material or its properties due to a reaction of that material with its chemical environment. (2) The term “military equipment” includes all weapon systems, weapon platforms, vehicles, and munitions of the Department of Defense, and the components of such items. (3) The term “infrastructure” includes all buildings, structures, airfields, port facilities, surface and subterranean utility systems, heating and cooling systems, fuel tanks, pavements, and bridges. (4) The term “budget”, with respect to a fiscal year, means the budget for that fiscal year that is submitted to Congress by the President under [section 1105(a) of title 31](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title31-section1105/a&num=0&edition=prelim). (5) The term “defense budget materials”, with respect to a fiscal year, means the materials submitted to Congress by the Secretary of Defense in support of the budget for that fiscal year. (6) The term “qualified training program” means a training program in corrosion control, mitigation, and prevention that is— (A) offered or accredited by an organization that sets industry corrosion standards; or (B) an industrial coatings applicator training program registered under the Act of August 16, 1937 (popularly known as the “National Apprenticeship Act”; [29 U.S.C. 50](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title29-section50&num=0&edition=prelim) et seq.).

Cross-references

Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

29 U.S.C. § 50 — Promotion of labor standards of apprenticeship

The Secretary of Labor is authorized and directed to formulate and promote the furtherance of labor standards necessary to safeguard the welfare of apprentices, to extend the application of such standards by encouraging the inclusion thereof in contracts of apprenticeship, to bring together employers and labor for the formulation of programs of apprenticeship, to cooperate with State agencies engaged in the formulation and promotion of standards of apprenticeship, and to cooperate with the Secretary of Education in accordance with [section 17 of title 20](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title20-section17&num=0&edition=prelim). For the purposes of this chapter the term “State” shall include the District of Columbia.

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 29 U.S.C. § 50

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

5 U.S.C. § 6382 — Leave requirement

**(a)** (1) Subject to section 6383 and subsection (d)(2) of this section, an employee shall be entitled to a total of 12 administrative workweeks of leave during any 12-month period for one or more of the following: (A) Because of the birth of a son or daughter of the employee and in order to care for such son or daughter. (B) Because of the placement of a son or daughter with the employee for adoption or foster care. (C) In order to care for the spouse, or a son, daughter, or parent, of the employee, if such spouse, son, daughter, or parent has a serious health condition. (D) Because of a serious health condition that makes the employee unable to perform the functions of the employee’s position. (E) Because of any qualifying exigency arising out of the fact that the spouse, or a son, daughter, or parent of the employee is on covered active duty (or has been notified of an impending call or order to covered active duty) in the Armed Forces. (2) The entitlement to leave under subparagraph (A) or (B) of paragraph (1) based on the birth or placement of a son or daughter shall expire at the end of the 12-month period beginning on the date of such birth or placement. (3) Subject to section 6383, an employee who is the spouse, son, daughter, parent, or next of kin of a covered servicemember shall be entitled to a total of 26 administrative workweeks of leave during a 12-month period to care for the servicemember. The leave described in this paragraph shall only be available during a single 12-month period. (4) Subject to subsection (d)(2), during the single 12-month period described in paragraph (3), an employee shall be entitled to a combined total of 26 administrative workweeks of leave under paragraphs (1) and (3). Nothing in this paragraph shall be con

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 5 U.S.C. § 6382

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

10 U.S.C. § 1731 — Critical acquisition positions

**(a) Designation of Critical Acquisition Positions.—** (1) The Secretary of Defense shall designate the acquisition positions in the Department of Defense that are critical acquisition positions. Such positions shall include the following: (A) Any acquisition position which— (i) in the case of employees, is required to be filled by an employee in a senior position in the National Security Personnel System, as determined in accordance with guidelines prescribed by the Secretary, or in the Senior Executive Service; or (ii) in the case of members of the armed forces, is required to be filled by a commissioned officer of the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, or Space Force who is serving in the grade of lieutenant colonel, or, in the case of the Navy, commander, or a higher grade. (B) Other selected acquisition positions not covered by subparagraph (A), including the following: (i) Portfolio acquisition executive. (ii) Program manager of a major defense acquisition program (as defined in [section 4201 of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title10-section4201&num=0&edition=prelim)) or of a significant nonmajor defense acquisition program (as defined in [section 1737(a)(3) of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title10-section1737/a/3&num=0&edition=prelim)). (iii) Deputy program manager of a major defense acquisition program. (iv) Product support manager. (C) Any other acquisition position of significant responsibility in which the primary duties are supervisory or management duties. (2) The Secretary shall periodically publish a list of the positions designated under this subsection. **(b) Promotion Rate for Officers in the Acquisition Workforce.—** The Se

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 10 U.S.C. § 1731

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

10 U.S.C. § 2228 — Office of Corrosion Policy and Oversight

Page 1812 TITLE 10—ARMED FORCES § 2224a 1 See References in Text note below. fense committees [Committees on Armed Services and Appropriations of the Senate and the House of Rep- resentatives] a report on the strategy required by sub- section (a). The report shall include the following: ‘‘(1) A description of the current status of the strat- egy required by subsection (a) and of the implementa- tion of the strategy, including a description of the role of the strategy in the risk management by the Department regarding the supply chain and in oper- ational planning for cyber security. ‘‘(2) A description of the risks, if any, that the De- partment will accept in the strategy due to limita- tions on funds or other applicable constraints.’’ INSTITUTE FOR DEFENSE COMPUTER SECURITY AND INFORMATION PROTECTION Pub. L. 106–398, § 1 [[div. A], title IX, § 921], Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1654, 1654A–233, provided that: ‘‘(a) ESTABLISHMENT.—The Secretary of Defense shall establish an Institute for Defense Computer Security and Information Protection. ‘‘(b) MISSION.—The Secretary shall require the insti- tute— ‘‘(1) to conduct research and technology develop- ment that is relevant to foreseeable computer and network security requirements and information as- surance requirements of the Department of Defense with a principal focus on areas not being carried out by other organizations in the private or public sector; and ‘‘(2) to facilitate the exchange of information re- garding cyberthreats, technology, tools, and other relevant issues. ‘‘(c) CONTRACTOR OPERATION.—The Secretary shall enter into a contract with a not-for-profit entity, or a consortium of not-for-profit entities, to organize and operate the institute. The Secretary shall use competi- tive procedu

Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 10 U.S.C. § 2228

Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

29 U.S.C. § 50 — Promotion of labor standards of apprentice-

Page 26 TITLE 29—LABOR §§ 49m, 49n Subsec. (e)(2)(G). Pub. L. 105–277, § 101(f) [title VIII, § 403(a)(1)(B)], and Pub. L. 105–332, § 5(b)(1)(B), amended subpar. (G) identically, substituting ‘‘comple- mentarity’’ for ‘‘complementary’’. Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries EFFECTIVE DATE OF 2018 AMENDMENT Amendment by Pub. L. 115–224 effective July 1, 2019, see section 4 of Pub. L. 115–224, set out as a note under section 2301 of Title 20, Education. EFFECTIVE DATE OF 2014 AMENDMENT Amendment by Pub. L. 113–128 effective on the first day of the first full program year after July 22, 2014 (July 1, 2015), see section 506 of Pub. L. 113–128, set out as an Effective Date note under section 3101 of this title. EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1998 AMENDMENTS Pub. L. 105–332, § 5(b)(2), Oct. 31, 1998, 112 Stat. 3127, provided that: ‘‘The amendments made by paragraph (1) [amending this section] take effect July 2, 1999.’’ Pub. L. 105–277, div. A, § 101(f) [title VIII, § 403(a)(2)], Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–337, 2681–416, provided that: ‘‘The amendments made by paragraph (1) [amending this section] take effect on July 2, 1999.’’ EFFECTIVE DATE Section effective July 1, 1999, see section 311 of Pub. L. 105–220, formerly set out as an Effective Date of 1998 Amendment note under section 49a of this title. §§ 49m, 49n. Omitted Editorial Notes CODIFICATION Section 49m, Pub. L. 88–136, title I, Oct. 11, 1963, 77 Stat. 225, relating to payments to States for adminis- trative expenses for their unemployment compensation law and their public employment offices, was from the Department of Labor Appropriation Act, 1964, and was not repeated in the Department of Labor Appropriation Act of 1965. Similar provisions were contained in the following prior appropriat

Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 29 U.S.C. § 50

Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. The source passage cites 29 U.S.C. § 50. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.