Browse Arkansas Code titles and sections

15 U.S.C. § 28 — Repealed. Pub. L. 98–620, title IV, § 402(11), Nov. 8, 1984, 98 Stat. 3358

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

15 U.S.C. § 28 — Repealed. Pub. L. 98–620, title IV, § 402(11), Nov. 8, 1984, 98 Stat. 3358

### Statutory Notes Section, acts Feb. 11, 1903, ch. 544, § 1, 32 Stat. 823; June 25, 1910, ch. 428, 36 Stat. 854; Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, § 291, 36 Stat. 1167; Apr. 6, 1942, ch. 210, § 1, 56 Stat. 198; June 25, 1948, ch. 646, § 32(a), 62 Stat. 991; May 24, 1949, ch. 139, § 127, 63 Stat. 107; Dec. 21, 1974, Pub. L. 93–528, § 4, 88 Stat. 1708, related to expedition of actions by the United States involving general public importance. #### Effective Date of Repeal Repeal not applicable to cases pending on Nov. 8, 1984, see section 403 of Pub. L. 98–620, set out as an Effective Date note under [section 1657 of Title 28](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title28-section1657&num=0&edition=prelim), Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 15 U.S.C. § 28

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.

Original supplied file — preserved unchanged

Download original Markdown file

File SHA-256: b5cf0614be0830de55f83ef8d39317d5e2de6b836582c0eea0f357ccf793a0b9. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.

Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.

Open the recorded source website ↗

Record provenance

Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:record_usc_6a58bc1f691eacd827830d25
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code/title-15/section-28-repealed-pub-l-98620-title-iv-402-11-nov-8-1984-98-stat-3358--d59007452b.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: a471d8131b9cc906ccfefc0f160c4561831a1ee01751eeacdc24486a0faa78a9

Source location: Title 15, Chapter 1, § 28; chapter-001-monopolies-and-combinations-in-restraint-of-trade.md

Stored source content

Cross-references

Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

28 U.S.C. § 1657 — Priority of civil actions

**(a)** Notwithstanding any other provision of law, each court of the United States shall determine the order in which civil actions are heard and determined, except that the court shall expedite the consideration of any action brought under chapter 153 or [section 1826 of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title28-section1826&num=0&edition=prelim), any action for temporary or preliminary injunctive relief, or any other action if good cause therefor is shown. For purposes of this subsection, “good cause” is shown if a right under the Constitution of the United States or a Federal Statute (including rights under [section 552 of title 5](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title5-section552&num=0&edition=prelim)) would be maintained in a factual context that indicates that a request for expedited consideration has merit. **(b)** The Judicial Conference of the United States may modify the rules adopted by the courts to determine the order in which civil actions are heard and determined, in order to establish consistency among the judicial circuits.

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 28 U.S.C. § 1657

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

28 U.S.C. § 1253 — Direct appeals from decisions of three-judge courts

Except as otherwise provided by law, any party may appeal to the Supreme Court from an order granting or denying, after notice and hearing, an interlocutory or permanent injunction in any civil action, suit or proceeding required by any Act of Congress to be heard and determined by a district court of three judges.

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 28 U.S.C. § 1253

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Incoming connection: Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

28 U.S.C. § 2284 — Three-judge court; when required; composition; procedure

**(a)** A district court of three judges shall be convened when otherwise required by Act of Congress, or when an action is filed challenging the constitutionality of the apportionment of congressional districts or the apportionment of any statewide legislative body. **(b)** In any action required to be heard and determined by a district court of three judges under subsection (a) of this section, the composition and procedure of the court shall be as follows: (1) Upon the filing of a request for three judges, the judge to whom the request is presented shall, unless he determines that three judges are not required, immediately notify the chief judge of the circuit, who shall designate two other judges, at least one of whom shall be a circuit judge. The judges so designated, and the judge to whom the request was presented, shall serve as members of the court to hear and determine the action or proceeding. (2) If the action is against a State, or officer or agency thereof, at least five days’ notice of hearing of the action shall be given by registered or certified mail to the Governor and attorney general of the State. (3) A single judge may conduct all proceedings except the trial, and enter all orders permitted by the rules of civil procedure except as provided in this subsection. He may grant a temporary restraining order on a specific finding, based on evidence submitted, that specified irreparable damage will result if the order is not granted, which order, unless previously revoked by the district judge, shall remain in force only until the hearing and determination by the district court of three judges of an application for a preliminary injunction. A single judge shall not appoint a master, or order a reference, or hear and determine any application for a prel

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 28 U.S.C. § 2284

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Incoming connection: Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

15 U.S.C. § 28 — Repealed. Pub. L. 98–620, title IV, § 402(11),

Page 42 TITLE 15—COMMERCE AND TRADE § 27 generally to chapter 32 (§ 1291 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Ta- bles. CODIFICATION Another section 27 of act Oct. 15, 1914, ch. 323, was re- numbered section 28 and is classified to section 27 of this title. Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries PURPOSE Pub. L. 105–297, § 2, Oct. 27, 1998, 112 Stat. 2824, pro- vided that: ‘‘It is the purpose of this legislation to state that major league baseball players are covered under the antitrust laws (i.e., that major league baseball players will have the same rights under the antitrust laws as do other professional athletes, e.g., football and basketball players), along with a provision that makes it clear that the passage of this Act [enacting this sec- tion and provisions set out as a note under section 1 of this title] does not change the application of the anti- trust laws in any other context or with respect to any other person or entity.’’ § 27. Effect of partial invalidity If any clause, sentence, paragraph, or part of this Act shall, for any reason, be adjudged by any court of competent jurisdiction to be in- valid, such judgment shall not affect, impair, or invalidate the remainder thereof, but shall be confined in its operation to the clause, sentence, paragraph, or part thereof directly involved in the controversy in which such judgment shall have been rendered. (Oct. 15, 1914, ch. 323, § 28, formerly § 26, 38 Stat. 740; renumbered § 27, Pub. L. 96–493, § 2, Dec. 2, 1980, 94 Stat. 2568; renumbered § 28, Pub. L. 107–273, div. C, title IV, § 14102(d), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1922.) Editorial Notes REFERENCES IN TEXT This Act, referred to in text, is act Oct. 15, 1914, ch. 323, 38 Stat. 730, know

Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 15 U.S.C. § 28

Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.