Arkansas Legal Resource Navigator

47 U.S.C. § 763 — General criteria to ensure a pro-competitive privatization of INTELSAT and Inmarsat

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

47 U.S.C. § 763 — General criteria to ensure a pro-competitive privatization of INTELSAT and Inmarsat

The President and the Commission shall secure a pro-competitive privatization of INTELSAT and Inmarsat that meets the criteria set forth in this section and sections 763a through 763c 11 See References in Text note below. of this title. In securing such privatizations, the following criteria shall be applied as licensing criteria for purposes of part A: (1) **Dates for privatization** — Privatization shall be obtained in accordance with the criteria of this subchapter of— (A) INTELSAT as soon as practicable, but no later than April 1, 2001; and (B) Inmarsat as soon as practicable, but no later than July 1, 2000. (2) **Independence** — The privatized successor entities and separated entities of INTELSAT and Inmarsat shall operate as independent commercial entities, and have a pro-competitive ownership structure. The successor entities and separated entities of INTELSAT and Inmarsat shall conduct an initial public offering in accordance with paragraph (5) to achieve such independence. Such offering shall substantially dilute the aggregate ownership of such entities by such signatories or former signatories. In determining whether a public offering attains such substantial dilution, the Commission shall take into account the purposes and intent, privatization criteria, and other provisions of this subchapter, as well as market conditions. No intergovernmental organization, including INTELSAT or Inmarsat, shall have— (A) an ownership interest in INTELSAT or the successor or separated entities of INTELSAT; or (B) more than minimal ownership interest in Inmarsat or the successor or separated entities of Inmarsat. (3) **Termination of privileges and immunities** — The preferential treatment of INTELSAT and Inmarsat shall not be extended to any successor entity o

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 47 U.S.C. § 763

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.

Original supplied file — preserved unchanged

Download original Markdown file

File SHA-256: 8233ddd5663eae360c3db970b7b2ab9737df129f1dc74acf6863ad52eeebab72. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.

Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.

Open the recorded source website ↗

Record provenance

Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:record_usc_65b213dd5ff4315929cc75b1
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code/title-47/section-763-general-criteria-to-ensure-a-pro-competitive-privatization-of-intelsat-a--8305505cb2.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: 0a48f06cfac056df9d0f904b54f9dab51123da07acbdcf0d7f79ee43aa5b09ae

Source location: Title 47, Chapter 6, § 763; chapter-006-communications-satellite-system.md

Stored source content

The President and the Commission shall secure a pro-competitive privatization of INTELSAT and Inmarsat that meets the criteria set forth in this section and sections 763a through 763c 11 See References in Text note below. of this title. In securing such privatizations, the following criteria shall be applied as licensing criteria for purposes of part A: (1) **Dates for privatization** — Privatization shall be obtained in accordance with the criteria of this subchapter of— (A) INTELSAT as soon as practicable, but no later than April 1, 2001; and (B) Inmarsat as soon as practicable, but no later than July 1, 2000. (2) **Independence** — The privatized successor entities and separated entities of INTELSAT and Inmarsat shall operate as independent commercial entities, and have a pro-competitive ownership structure. The successor entities and separated entities of INTELSAT and Inmarsat shall conduct an initial public offering in accordance with paragraph (5) to achieve such independence. Such offering shall substantially dilute the aggregate ownership of such entities by such signatories or former signatories. In determining whether a public offering attains such substantial dilution, the Commission shall take into account the purposes and intent, privatization criteria, and other provisions of this subchapter, as well as market conditions. No intergovernmental organization, including INTELSAT or Inmarsat, shall have— (A) an ownership interest in INTELSAT or the successor or separated entities of INTELSAT; or (B) more than minimal ownership interest in Inmarsat or the successor or separated entities of Inmarsat. (3) **Termination of privileges and immunities** — The preferential treatment of INTELSAT and Inmarsat shall not be extended to any successor entity or separated entity of INTELSAT or Inmarsat. Such preferential treatment includes— (A) privileged or immune treatment by national governments; (B) privileges or immunities or other competitive advantages of the type accorded INTELSAT and Inmarsat and their signatories through the terms and operation of the INTELSAT Agreement and the associated Headquarters Agreement and the Inmarsat Convention; and (C) preferential access to orbital locations. Access to new, or renewal of access to, orbital locations shall be subject to the legal or regulatory processes of a national government that applies due diligence requirements intended to prevent the warehousing of orbital locations. (4) **Prevention of expansion during transition** — During the transition period prior to privatization under this subchapter, INTELSAT and Inmarsat shall be precluded from expanding into additional services. (5) **Conversion to stock corporations** — Any successor entity or separated entity created out of INTELSAT or Inmarsat shall be a national corporation or similar accepted commercial structure, subject to the laws of the nation in which incorporated, as follows: (A) An initial public offering of securities of any successor entity or separated entity— (i) shall be conducted, for the successor entities of INTELSAT, on or about June 30, 2005, except that the Commission may extend this deadline in consideration of market conditions and relevant business factors relating to the timing of an initial public offering, but such extensions shall not permit such offering to be conducted later than December 31, 2005; and (ii) shall be conducted, for the successor entities of Inmarsat, not later than June 30, 2005, except that the Commission may extend this deadline to not later than December 31, 2004. (B) The shares of any successor entities and separated entities shall be listed for trading on one or more major stock exchanges with transparent and effective securities regulation. (C) A majority of the members of the board of directors of any successor entity or separated entity shall not be directors, employees, officers, or managers or otherwise serve as representatives of any signatory or former signatory. No member of the board of directors of any successor or separated entity shall be a director, employee, officer or manager of any intergovernmental organization remaining after the privatization. (D) Any successor entity or separated entity shall— (i) have a board of directors with a fiduciary obligation; (ii) have no officers or managers who are officers or managers of any signatories or former signatories; and (iii) have no directors, officers, or managers who hold such positions in any intergovernmental organization. (E) Any transactions or other relationships between or among any successor entity, separated entity, INTELSAT, or Inmarsat shall be conducted on an arm’s length basis. (F) Notwithstanding subparagraphs (A) and (B), a successor entity may be deemed a national corporation and may forgo an initial public offering and public securities listing and still achieve the purposes of this section if— (i) the successor entity certifies to the Commission that— (I) the successor entity has achieved substantial dilution of the aggregate amount of signatory or former signatory financial interest in such entity; (II) any signatories and former signatories that retain a financial interest in such successor entity do not possess, together or individually, effective control of such successor entity; and (III) no intergovernmental organization has any ownership interest in a successor entity of INTELSAT or more than a minimal ownership interest in a successor entity of Inmarsat; (ii) the successor entity provides such financial and other information to the Commission as the Commission may require to verify such certification; and (iii) the Commission determines, after notice and comment, that the successor entity is in compliance with such certification. (G) For purposes of subparagraph (F), the term “substantial dilution” means that a majority of the financial interests in the successor entity is no longer held or controlled, directly or indirectly, by signatories or former signatories. (6) **Regulatory treatment** — Any successor entity or separated entity created after March 17, 2000, shall apply through the appropriate national licensing authorities for international frequency assignments and associated orbital registrations for all satellites. (7) **Competition policies in domiciliary country** — Any successor entity or separated entity shall be subject to the jurisdiction of a nation or nations that— (A) have effective laws and regulations that secure competition in telecommunications services; (B) are signatories of the World Trade Organization Basic Telecommunications Services Agreement; and (C) have a schedule of commitments in such Agreement that includes non-discriminatory market access to their satellite markets.

Cross-references

Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

47 U.S.C. § 763c — Space segment capacity of the GMDSS

The United States shall preserve the space segment capacity of the GMDSS. This section is not intended to alter the status that the GMDSS would otherwise have under United States laws and regulations of the International Telecommunication Union with respect to spectrum, orbital locations, or other operational parameters, or to be a barrier to competition for the provision of GMDSS services.

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 47 U.S.C. § 763c

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

47 U.S.C. § 763b — Repealed. Pub. L. 109–34, § 2, July 12, 2005, 119 Stat. 377

### Statutory Notes Section, Pub. L. 87–624, title VI, § 623, as added Pub. L. 106–180, § 3, Mar. 17, 2000, 114 Stat. 53, related to specific criteria for INTELSAT separated entities.

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 47 U.S.C. § 763b

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

47 U.S.C. § 701 — Omitted

### Statutory Notes #### Codification Section, Pub. L. 87–624, title I, § 102, Aug. 31, 1962, 76 Stat. 419, which related to Congressional declaration of policy and purpose, ceased to be effective Apr. 15, 2005, pursuant to [section 765d(4) of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title47-section765d/4&num=0&edition=prelim). #### Short Title of 2003 Amendment Pub. L. 108–39, § 1, June 30, 2003, 117 Stat. 835, provided that: “This Act [amending [section 763 of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title47-section763&num=0&edition=prelim)] may be cited as the ‘ORBIT Technical Corrections Act of 2003’.” #### Short Title of 2000 Amendment Pub. L. 106–180, § 1, Mar. 17, 2000, 114 Stat. 48, provided that: “This Act [enacting subchapter VI of this chapter] may be cited as the ‘Open-market Reorganization for the Betterment of International Telecommunications Act’ or the ‘ORBIT Act’.” #### Short Title Pub. L. 87–624, title I, § 101, Aug. 31, 1962, 76 Stat. 419, provided that: “This Act [enacting this chapter] may be cited as the ‘Communications Satellite Act of 1962’.” Pub. L. 87–624, title V, § 501, as added by Pub. L. 95–564, Nov. 1, 1978, 92 Stat. 2392, provided that: “This title [enacting subchapter V of this chapter] may be cited as the ‘International Maritime Satellite Telecommunications Act’.” #### Stylistic Consistency Pub. L. 103–414, title III, § 303(f), Oct. 25, 1994, 108 Stat. 4296, provided that: “The Communications Act of 1934 [[47 U.S.C. 151](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title47-section151&num=0&edition=prelim) et seq.] and the Communications Satellite Act of 1962 [[47 U.S.C. 701](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title47-section70

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 47 U.S.C. § 701

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Incoming connection: Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

47 U.S.C. § 763a — Specific criteria for INTELSAT

In securing the privatizations required by [section 763 of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title47-section763&num=0&edition=prelim), the following additional criteria with respect to INTELSAT privatization shall be applied as licensing criteria for purposes of part A: (1) **11 So in original. No par. (2) has been enacted. Technical coordination under intelsat agreements.—** — Technical coordination shall not be used to impair competition or competitors, and shall be conducted under International Telecommunication Union procedures and not under Article XIV(d) of the INTELSAT Agreement.

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 47 U.S.C. § 763a

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Incoming connection: Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

8 U.S.C. § 1101 — Definitions

**(a)** As used in this chapter— (1) The term “administrator” means the official designated by the Secretary of State pursuant to [section 1104(b) of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title8-section1104/b&num=0&edition=prelim). (2) The term “advocates” includes, but is not limited to, advises, recommends, furthers by overt act, and admits belief in. (3) The term “alien” means any person not a citizen or national of the United States. (4) The term “application for admission” has reference to the application for admission into the United States and not to the application for the issuance of an immigrant or nonimmigrant visa. (5) The term “Attorney General” means the Attorney General of the United States. (6) The term “border crossing identification card” means a document of identity bearing that designation issued to an alien who is lawfully admitted for permanent residence, or to an alien who is a resident in foreign contiguous territory, by a consular officer or an immigration officer for the purpose of crossing over the borders between the United States and foreign contiguous territory in accordance with such conditions for its issuance and use as may be prescribed by regulations. Such regulations shall provide that (A) each such document include a biometric identifier (such as the fingerprint or handprint of the alien) that is machine readable and (B) an alien presenting a border crossing identification card is not permitted to cross over the border into the United States unless the biometric identifier contained on the card matches the appropriate biometric characteristic of the alien. (7) The term “clerk of court” means a clerk of a naturalization court. (8) The terms “Commissioner” and “Deputy Commissioner” mean the Co

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 8 U.S.C. § 1101

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Incoming connection: Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

47 U.S.C. § 763 — General criteria to ensure a pro-competi-

Page 357 TITLE 47—TELECOMMUNICATIONS § 763 paragraph (B) in a manner that will, or is reasonably likely to, result in limitation, denial, or revocation of authority for non- core services that are used by and required for a national security agency or law en- forcement department or agency of the United States, or used by and required for, and otherwise in the public interest, any other Department or Agency of the United States to protect the health and safety of the public. Such services may be obtained by the United States directly from INTELSAT, Inmarsat, or a successor entity, or indirectly through COMSAT, or authorized carriers or distributors of the successor entity. (D) Rule of construction Nothing in this subsection is intended to preclude the Commission from acting upon applications of INTELSAT, Inmarsat, or their successor entities prior to the latest date set out in section 763(5)(A) of this title, including such actions as may be necessary for the United States to become the licens- ing jurisdiction for INTELSAT, but the Commission shall condition a grant of au- thority pursuant to this subsection upon compliance with sections 763 and 763a of this title. (2) Criteria for competition test In making the determination required by paragraph (1), the Commission shall use the li- censing criteria in sections 763, 763a, and 763c 1 of this title, and shall determine that competi- tion in the telecommunications markets of the United States will be harmed unless the Commission finds that the privatization re- ferred to in paragraph (1) is consistent with such criteria. (3) Clarification: competitive safeguards In making its licensing decisions under this subsection, the Commission shall consider whether users of non-core services prov

Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 47 U.S.C. § 763

Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.