Browse Arkansas Code titles and sections
50 U.S.C. § 3107 — Critical cost growth in major systems
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a) Reassessment of major system** If the Director of National Intelligence determines under [section 3101(d) of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title50-section3101/d&num=0&edition=prelim) that the total acquisition cost of a major system has increased by a percentage equal to or greater than the critical cost growth threshold for the major system, the Director shall—
(1) determine the root cause or causes of the critical cost growth, in accordance with applicable statutory requirements, policies, procedures, and guidance; and
(2) carry out an assessment of—
(A) the projected cost of completing the major system if current requirements are not modified;
(B) the projected cost of completing the major system based on reasonable modification of such requirements;
(C) the rough order of magnitude of the costs of any reasonable alternative system or capability; and
(D) the need to reduce funding for other systems due to the growth in cost of the major system.
**(b) Presumption of termination**
(1) After conducting the reassessment required by subsection (a) with respect to a major system, the Director shall terminate the major system unless the Director submits to Congress a Major System Congressional Report containing a certification in accordance with paragraph (2) and the information described in paragraph (3). The Director shall submit such Major System Congressional Report and certification not later than 90 days after the date the Director receives the relevant major system cost report under subsection (b) or (c) of [section 3101 of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title50-section3101&num=0&edition=prelim).
(2) A certification described by this paragraph with respect to a
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 50 U.S.C. § 3107
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.
Original supplied file — preserved unchanged
Download original Markdown file
File SHA-256: fe66f37f09d97377d7f0e39f812831e5fc28212bb20ea64b167953f5edbfd97e. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.
Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.
Open the recorded source website ↗
Record provenance
Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:record_usc_4f212da6b9358d76e0ce9d18
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code/title-50/section-3107-critical-cost-growth-in-major-systems--1bac8f2017.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: 2eb4d0871dd65980b24dc3b9e96cf69a73c44bec2d901d2149ead811d9749cdf
Source location: Title 50, Chapter 44, § 3107; chapter-044-national-security.md
Stored source content
**(a) Reassessment of major system** If the Director of National Intelligence determines under [section 3101(d) of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title50-section3101/d&num=0&edition=prelim) that the total acquisition cost of a major system has increased by a percentage equal to or greater than the critical cost growth threshold for the major system, the Director shall—
(1) determine the root cause or causes of the critical cost growth, in accordance with applicable statutory requirements, policies, procedures, and guidance; and
(2) carry out an assessment of—
(A) the projected cost of completing the major system if current requirements are not modified;
(B) the projected cost of completing the major system based on reasonable modification of such requirements;
(C) the rough order of magnitude of the costs of any reasonable alternative system or capability; and
(D) the need to reduce funding for other systems due to the growth in cost of the major system.
**(b) Presumption of termination**
(1) After conducting the reassessment required by subsection (a) with respect to a major system, the Director shall terminate the major system unless the Director submits to Congress a Major System Congressional Report containing a certification in accordance with paragraph (2) and the information described in paragraph (3). The Director shall submit such Major System Congressional Report and certification not later than 90 days after the date the Director receives the relevant major system cost report under subsection (b) or (c) of [section 3101 of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title50-section3101&num=0&edition=prelim).
(2) A certification described by this paragraph with respect to a major system is a written certification that—
(A) the continuation of the major system is essential to the national security;
(B) there are no alternatives to the major system that will provide acceptable capability to meet the intelligence requirement at less cost;
(C) the new estimates of the total acquisition cost have been determined by the Director to be reasonable;
(D) the major system is a higher priority than other systems whose funding must be reduced to accommodate the growth in cost of the major system; and
(E) the management structure for the major system is adequate to manage and control the total acquisition cost.
(3) A Major System Congressional Report accompanying a written certification under paragraph (2) shall include, in addition to the requirements of [section 3101(e) of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title50-section3101/e&num=0&edition=prelim), the root cause analysis and assessment carried out pursuant to subsection (a), the basis for each determination made in accordance with subparagraphs (A) through (E) of paragraph (2), and a description of all funding changes made as a result of the growth in the cost of the major system, including reductions made in funding for other systems to accommodate such cost growth, together with supporting documentation.
**(c) Actions if major system not terminated** If the Director elects not to terminate a major system pursuant to subsection (b), the Director shall—
(1) restructure the major system in a manner that addresses the root cause or causes of the critical cost growth, as identified pursuant to subsection (a), and ensures that the system has an appropriate management structure as set forth in the certification submitted pursuant to subsection (b)(2)(E);
(2) rescind the most recent Milestone approval for the major system;
(3) require a new Milestone approval for the major system before taking any action to enter a new contract, exercise an option under an existing contract, or otherwise extend the scope of an existing contract under the system, except to the extent determined necessary by the Milestone Decision Authority, on a nondelegable basis, to ensure that the system may be restructured as intended by the Director without unnecessarily wasting resources;
(4) establish a revised current Baseline Estimate for the major system based upon an updated cost estimate; and
(5) conduct regular reviews of the major system.
**(d) Actions if major system terminated** If a major system is terminated pursuant to subsection (b), the Director shall submit to Congress a written report setting forth—
(1) an explanation of the reasons for terminating the major system;
(2) the alternatives considered to address any problems in the major system; and
(3) the course the Director plans to pursue to meet any intelligence requirements otherwise intended to be met by the major system.
**(e) Form of report** Any report or certification required to be submitted under this section may be submitted in a classified form.
**(f) Waiver**
(1) The Director may waive the requirements of subsections (d)(2), (e), and (g) of [section 3101 of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title50-section3101&num=0&edition=prelim) and subsections (a)(2), (b), (c), and (d) of this section with respect to a major system if the Director determines that at least 90 percent of the amount of the current Baseline Estimate for the major system has been expended.
(2)
(A) If the Director grants a waiver under paragraph (1) with respect to a major system, the Director shall submit to the congressional intelligence committees written notice of the waiver that includes—
(i) the information described in [section 3101(f) of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title50-section3101/f&num=0&edition=prelim); and
(ii) if the current total acquisition cost of the major system has increased by a percentage equal to or greater than the critical cost growth threshold—
(I) a determination of the root cause or causes of the critical cost growth, as described in subsection (a)(1); and
(II) a certification that includes the elements described in subparagraphs (A), (B), and (E) of subsection (b)(2).
(B) The Director shall submit the written notice required by subparagraph (A) not later than 90 days after the date that the Director receives a major system cost report under subsection (b) or (c) of [section 3101 of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title50-section3101&num=0&edition=prelim) that indicates that the total acquisition cost for the major system has increased by a percentage equal to or greater than the significant cost growth threshold or critical cost growth threshold.
**(g) Definitions** In this section, the terms “cost estimate”, “critical cost growth threshold”, “current Baseline Estimate”, “major system”, and “total acquisition cost” have the meaning given those terms in [section 3101(a) of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title50-section3101/a&num=0&edition=prelim).
Cross-references
Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a)**
(1) The transfer of a defense article or defense service, or the anticipated transfer in any fiscal year of any aggregation of defense articles or defense services, exceeding $1,000,000 in value by an intelligence agency to a recipient outside that agency shall be considered a significant anticipated intelligence activity for the purpose of this subchapter.
(2) Paragraph (1) does not apply if—
(A) the transfer is being made to a department, agency, or other entity of the United States (so long as there will not be a subsequent retransfer of the defense articles or defense services outside the United States Government in conjunction with an intelligence or intelligence-related activity); or
(B) the transfer—
(i) is being made pursuant to authorities contained in part II of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 [[22 U.S.C. 2301](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title22-section2301&num=0&edition=prelim) et seq.], the Arms Export Control Act [[22 U.S.C. 2751](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title22-section2751&num=0&edition=prelim) et seq.], title 10 (including a law enacted pursuant to [section 8677(a) of title 10](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title10-section8677/a&num=0&edition=prelim)), or chapters 1 to 11 of title 40 and division C (except sections 3302, 3307(e), 3501(b), 3509, 3906, 4710, and 4711) of subtitle I of title 41, and
(ii) is not being made in conjunction with an intelligence or intelligence-related activity.
(3) An intelligence agency may not transfer any defense articles or defense services outside the agency in conjunction with any intelligence or intelligence-related activity for which funds were denied by the Congress.
**(b)** As used in thi
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 50 U.S.C. § 3101
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
The head of each element of the intelligence community shall annually submit to the congressional intelligence committees—
(1) a certification that, to the best of the knowledge of the head of such element—
(A) the head of such element is in full compliance with the requirements of this subchapter; and
(B) any information required to be submitted by the head of such element under this chapter before the date of the submission of such certification has been properly submitted; or
(2) if the head of such element is unable to submit a certification under paragraph (1), a statement—
(A) of the reasons the head of such element is unable to submit such a certification;
(B) describing any information required to be submitted by the head of such element under this chapter before the date of the submission of such statement that has not been properly submitted; and
(C) that the head of such element will submit such information as soon as possible after the submission of such statement.
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 50 U.S.C. § 3112
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Incoming connection: Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
### Statutory Notes
#### Codification
Section 415d, comprising section 508 of the National Security Act of 1947, act July 26, 1947, ch. 343, was editorially reclassified as [section 3107 of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title50-section3107&num=0&edition=prelim).
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 50 U.S.C. § 422
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Incoming connection: Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 690
TITLE 50—WAR AND NATIONAL DEFENSE
§ 3107
‘‘(2) The Secretary of Defense or the Secretary of En-
ergy may carry out any consultation required by this
subsection through an official of the Department of De-
fense or the Department of Energy, as the case may be,
designated by such Secretary for that purpose.
‘‘(b) SUBMITTAL.—Any report, review, study, or plan
referred to in subsection (a) shall be submitted, in addi-
tion to any other committee of Congress specified for
submittal in the provision concerned, to the following
committees or subcommittees of Congress, as appro-
priate:
‘‘(1) The Committee on Armed Services, the Sub-
committee on Defense of the Committee on Appro-
priations, and the Select Committee on Intelligence
of the Senate.
‘‘(2) The Committee on Armed Services, the Sub-
committee on Defense of the Committee on Appro-
priations, and the Permanent Select Committee on
Intelligence of the House of Representatives.’’
Similar provisions were contained in the following
prior acts:
Pub. L. 108–177, title I, § 107, Dec. 13, 2003, 117 Stat.
2604.
Pub. L. 107–306, title I, § 109, Nov. 27, 2002, 116 Stat.
2389.
Pub. L. 107–108, title V, § 505, Dec. 28, 2001, 115 Stat.
1406.
DEADLINE FOR SUBMITTAL OF VARIOUS OVERDUE
REPORTS
Pub. L. 107–306, title VIII, § 801, Nov. 27, 2002, 116 Stat.
2418, provided that certain overdue reports that the Di-
rector of Central Intelligence has sole or primary re-
sponsibility to present to Congress must be submitted
to Congress no later than 180 days after Nov. 27, 2002, or
amounts available to the Director to carry out the
functions and duties of the Director’s Office would be
reduced by 1⁄3.
§ 3107. Certification of compliance with oversight
requirements
The head of each element of the intelligence
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 50 U.S.C. § 3107
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.