Browse Arkansas Code titles and sections
6 U.S.C. § 565 — 5-year technology investment plan
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a) In general** The Administrator shall—
(1) not later than 180 days after December 18, 2014, develop and submit to Congress a strategic 5-year technology investment plan, that may include a classified addendum to report sensitive transportation security risks, technology vulnerabilities, or other sensitive security information; and
(2) to the extent possible, publish the Plan in an unclassified format in the public domain.
**(b) Consultation** The Administrator shall develop the Plan in consultation with—
(1) the Under Secretary for Management;
(2) the Under Secretary for Science and Technology;
(3) the Chief Information Officer; and
(4) the aviation industry stakeholder advisory committee established by the Administrator.
**(c) Approval** The Administrator may not publish the Plan under subsection (a)(2) until it has been approved by the Secretary.
**(d) Contents of Plan** The Plan shall include—
(1) an analysis of transportation security risks and the associated capability gaps that would be best addressed by security-related technology, including consideration of the most recent quadrennial homeland security review under [section 347 of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title6-section347&num=0&edition=prelim);
(2) a set of security-related technology acquisition needs that—
(A) is prioritized based on risk and associated capability gaps identified under paragraph (1); and
(B) includes planned technology programs and projects with defined objectives, goals, timelines, and measures;
(3) an analysis of current and forecast trends in domestic and international passenger travel;
(4) an identification of currently deployed security-related technologies that are at or near the end of their lifecycles;
(5) an ide
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 6 U.S.C. § 565
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.
Original supplied file — preserved unchanged
Download original Markdown file
File SHA-256: 21259b2e531d6507a5e5795974d3e12019c0ac97221ee2340390f546e5dbe2a8. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.
Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.
Open the recorded source website ↗
Record provenance
Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:record_usc_42fbe0537db4cd4a587e4489
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code/title-6/section-565-5-year-technology-investment-plan--395cf795d3.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: fa27652831e2d1d45631bb0589472ca08f31d32860e86c82f5e29afe47da804c
Source location: Title 6, Chapter 1, § 565; chapter-001-homeland-security-organization.md
Stored source content
**(a) In general** The Administrator shall—
(1) not later than 180 days after December 18, 2014, develop and submit to Congress a strategic 5-year technology investment plan, that may include a classified addendum to report sensitive transportation security risks, technology vulnerabilities, or other sensitive security information; and
(2) to the extent possible, publish the Plan in an unclassified format in the public domain.
**(b) Consultation** The Administrator shall develop the Plan in consultation with—
(1) the Under Secretary for Management;
(2) the Under Secretary for Science and Technology;
(3) the Chief Information Officer; and
(4) the aviation industry stakeholder advisory committee established by the Administrator.
**(c) Approval** The Administrator may not publish the Plan under subsection (a)(2) until it has been approved by the Secretary.
**(d) Contents of Plan** The Plan shall include—
(1) an analysis of transportation security risks and the associated capability gaps that would be best addressed by security-related technology, including consideration of the most recent quadrennial homeland security review under [section 347 of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title6-section347&num=0&edition=prelim);
(2) a set of security-related technology acquisition needs that—
(A) is prioritized based on risk and associated capability gaps identified under paragraph (1); and
(B) includes planned technology programs and projects with defined objectives, goals, timelines, and measures;
(3) an analysis of current and forecast trends in domestic and international passenger travel;
(4) an identification of currently deployed security-related technologies that are at or near the end of their lifecycles;
(5) an identification of test, evaluation, modeling, and simulation capabilities, including target methodologies, rationales, and timelines necessary to support the acquisition of the security-related technologies expected to meet the needs under paragraph (2);
(6) an identification of opportunities for public-private partnerships, small and disadvantaged company participation, intragovernment collaboration, university centers of excellence, and national laboratory technology transfer;
(7) an identification of the Administration’s acquisition workforce needs for the management of planned security-related technology acquisitions, including consideration of leveraging acquisition expertise of other Federal agencies;
(8) an identification of the security resources, including information security resources, that will be required to protect security-related technology from physical or cyber theft, diversion, sabotage, or attack;
(9) an identification of initiatives to streamline the Administration’s acquisition process and provide greater predictability and clarity to small, medium, and large businesses, including the timeline for testing and evaluation;
(10) an assessment of the impact to commercial aviation passengers;
(11) a strategy for consulting airport management, air carrier representatives, and Federal security directors whenever an acquisition will lead to the removal of equipment at airports, and how the strategy for consulting with such officials of the relevant airports will address potential negative impacts on commercial passengers or airport operations; and
(12) in consultation with the National Institutes of Standards and Technology, an identification of security-related technology interface standards, in existence or if implemented, that could promote more interoperable passenger, baggage, and cargo screening systems.
**(e) Leveraging the private sector** To the extent possible, and in a manner that is consistent with fair and equitable practices, the Plan shall—
(1) leverage emerging technology trends and research and development investment trends within the public and private sectors;
(2) incorporate private sector input, including from the aviation industry stakeholder advisory committee established by the Administrator, through requests for information, industry days, and other innovative means consistent with the Federal Acquisition Regulation; and
(3) in consultation with the Under Secretary for Science and Technology, identify technologies in existence or in development that, with or without adaptation, are expected to be suitable to meeting mission needs.
**(f) Disclosure** The Administrator shall include with the Plan a list of nongovernment persons that contributed to the writing of the Plan.
**(g) Update and report** The Administrator shall, in collaboration with relevant industry and government stakeholders, annually submit to Congress in an appendix to the budget request and publish in an unclassified format in the public domain—
(1) an update of the Plan;
(2) a report on the extent to which each security-related technology acquired by the Administration since the last issuance or update of the Plan is consistent with the planned technology programs and projects identified under subsection (d)(2) for that security-related technology; and
(3) information about acquisitions completed during the fiscal year preceding the fiscal year during which the report is submitted.
**(h) Additional update requirements** Updates and reports under subsection (g) shall—
(1) be prepared in consultation with—
(A) the persons described in subsection (b); and
(B) the Surface Transportation Security Advisory Committee established under [section 204 of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title6-section204&num=0&edition=prelim); and
(2) include—
(A) information relating to technology investments by the Transportation Security Administration and the private sector that the Department supports with research, development, testing, and evaluation for aviation, including air cargo, and surface transportation security;
(B) information about acquisitions completed during the fiscal year preceding the fiscal year during which the report is submitted;
(C) information relating to equipment of the Transportation Security Administration that is in operation after the end of the life-cycle of the equipment specified by the manufacturer of the equipment; and
(D) to the extent practicable, a classified addendum to report sensitive transportation security risks and associated capability gaps that would be best addressed by security-related technology described in subparagraph (A).
**(i) Notice of covered changes to plan**
(1) **Notice required** — The Administrator shall submit to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate and the Committee on Homeland Security of the House of Representatives notice of any covered change to the Plan not later than 90 days after the date that the covered change is made.
(2) **Definition of covered change** — In this subsection, the term “covered change” means—
(A) an increase or decrease in the dollar amount allocated to the procurement of a technology; or
(B) an increase or decrease in the number of a technology.
Cross-references
Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a) Findings** Congress finds the following:
(1) Members of the Armed Forces of the United States defend the freedom and security of our Nation.
(2) Members of the Armed Forces of the United States have lost their lives while battling the evils of terrorism around the world.
(3) Personnel of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) charged with the responsibility of covert observation of terrorists around the world are often put in harm’s way during their service to the United States.
(4) Personnel of the Central Intelligence Agency have also lost their lives while battling the evils of terrorism around the world.
(5) Employees of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and other Federal agencies charged with domestic protection of the United States put their lives at risk on a daily basis for the freedom and security of our Nation.
(6) United States military personnel, CIA personnel, FBI personnel, and other Federal agents in the service of the United States are patriots of the highest order.
(7) CIA officer Johnny Micheal Spann became the first American to give his life for his country in the War on Terrorism declared by President George W. Bush following the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001.
(8) Johnny Micheal Spann left behind a wife and children who are very proud of the heroic actions of their patriot father.
(9) Surviving dependents of members of the Armed Forces of the United States who lose their lives as a result of terrorist attacks or military operations abroad receive a $6,000 death benefit, plus a small monthly benefit.
(10) The current system of compensating spouses and children of American patriots is inequitable and needs improvement.
**(b) Designation of Johnny Micheal Spann Patriot Trusts** Any charitable corporation, fund, foundati
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 6 U.S.C. § 347
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a) In general** In furtherance of domestic preparedness and response, the Secretary, acting through the Under Secretary for Science and Technology, and in consultation with other relevant executive agencies, relevant State, local, and tribal governments, and relevant owners and operators of critical infrastructure, shall, to the extent practicable, conduct research and development to mitigate the consequences of threats of EMP and GMD.
**(b) Scope** The scope of the research and development under subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1) An objective scientific analysis—
(A) evaluating the risks to critical infrastructure from a range of threats of EMP and GMD; and
(B) which shall—
(i) be conducted in conjunction with the Office of Intelligence and Analysis; and
(ii) include a review and comparison of the range of threats and hazards facing critical infrastructure of the electrical grid.
(2) Determination of the critical utilities and national security assets and infrastructure that are at risk from threats of EMP and GMD.
(3) An evaluation of emergency planning and response technologies that would address the findings and recommendations of experts, including those of the Commission to Assess the Threat to the United States from Electromagnetic Pulse Attack, which shall include a review of the feasibility of rapidly isolating one or more portions of the electrical grid from the main electrical grid.
(4) An analysis of technology options that are available to improve the resiliency of critical infrastructure to threats of EMP and GMD, including an analysis of neutral current blocking devices that may protect high-voltage transmission lines.
(5) The restoration and recovery capabilities of critical infrastructure under differing levels of d
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 6 U.S.C. § 204
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 282
TITLE 6—DOMESTIC SECURITY
§ 565
1 So in original. Probably should be preceded by ‘‘a’’.
(1) Information on how existing Administra-
tion solicitation, testing, evaluation, piloting,
acquisition, and procurement processes impact
the Administrator’s ability to acquire from
the security technology industry marketplace,
including small business innovators that have
not previously provided technology to the Ad-
ministration, innovative technologies or capa-
bilities with the potential to enhance trans-
portation security.
(2) Specific actions that the Administrator
will take, including modifications to the proc-
esses described in paragraph (1), to foster di-
versification within the security technology
industry marketplace.
(3) Projected timelines for implementing the
actions described in paragraph (2).
(4) Plans for how the Administrator could, to
the extent practicable, assist a small business
innovator periodically during such processes,
including when such an innovator lacks ade-
quate resources to participate in such proc-
esses, to facilitate an advanced transportation
security technology or capability being devel-
oped and acquired by the Administrator.
(5) An assessment of the feasibility of
partnering with an organization described in
section 501(c)(3) of title 26 and exempt from
tax under section 501(a) of title 26 to provide
venture capital to businesses, particularly
small business innovators, for commercializa-
tion of innovative transportation security
technologies that are expected to be ready for
commercialization in the near term and with-
in 36 months.
(c) Feasibility assessment
In conducting the feasibility assessment under
subsection (b)(5), the Administrator shall con-
sider the following:
(1) Establishing an organiz
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 6 U.S.C. § 565
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.