Browse Arkansas Code titles and sections
5 U.S.C. § 705 — Relief pending review
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
When an agency finds that justice so requires, it may postpone the effective date of action taken by it, pending judicial review. On such conditions as may be required and to the extent necessary to prevent irreparable injury, the reviewing court, including the court to which a case may be taken on appeal from or on application for certiorari or other writ to a reviewing court, may issue all necessary and appropriate process to postpone the effective date of an agency action or to preserve status or rights pending conclusion of the review proceedings.
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 5 U.S.C. § 705
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.
Original supplied file — preserved unchanged
Download original Markdown file
File SHA-256: 9b7b072449d8cc8cc62652f10e460c8e71a3ddee35d6d3ea60e8698f1e24f2de. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.
Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.
Open the recorded source website ↗
Record provenance
Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:record_usc_42b9594e0a291ddcaf79ad60
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code/title-5/section-705-relief-pending-review--8d9bd83425.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: a00021e296aac34348c0a75bd2cd77728c13adcc14aa93d801f3638a9c016445
Source location: Title 5, Chapter 7, § 705; chapter-007-judicial-review.md
Stored source content
When an agency finds that justice so requires, it may postpone the effective date of action taken by it, pending judicial review. On such conditions as may be required and to the extent necessary to prevent irreparable injury, the reviewing court, including the court to which a case may be taken on appeal from or on application for certiorari or other writ to a reviewing court, may issue all necessary and appropriate process to postpone the effective date of an agency action or to preserve status or rights pending conclusion of the review proceedings.
Cross-references
Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a) Rulemaking**
(1) **In general** — Whenever in the judgment of the Commission such action will promote the objectives of this chapter by avoiding or resolving uncertainty as to its application, the Commission may by regulation declare to be a hazardous substance, for the purposes of this chapter, any substance or mixture of substances, which it finds meets the requirements of [section 1261(f)(1)(A) of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title15-section1261/f/1/A&num=0&edition=prelim).
(2) **Procedure** — Proceedings for the issuance, amendment, or repeal of regulations under this subsection and the admissibility of the record of such proceedings in other proceedings, shall be governed by the provisions of subsections (f) through (i) of this section.
**(b) Reasonable variations or additional label requirements** If the Commission finds that the requirements of [section 1261(p)(1) of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title15-section1261/p/1&num=0&edition=prelim) are not adequate for the protection of the public health and safety in view of the special hazard presented by any particular hazardous substance, it may by regulation establish such reasonable variations or additional label requirements as it finds necessary for the protection of the public health and safety; and any such hazardous substance intended, or packaged in a form suitable, for use in the household or by children, which fails to bear a label in accordance with such regulations shall be deemed to be a misbranded hazardous substance.
**(c) Exemption from requirements by regulation** If the Commission finds that, because of the size of the package involved or because of the minor hazard presented by the substance contained
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 15 U.S.C. § 1262
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Incoming connection: Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a) Final Commission orders; persons aggrieved; petition; record; findings; affirmance, modification, enforcement, or setting aside of orders; remand to adduce additional evidence**
(1) A person aggrieved by a final order of the Commission entered pursuant to this chapter may obtain review of the order in the United States Court of Appeals for the circuit in which he resides or has his principal place of business, or for the District of Columbia Circuit, by filing in such court, within sixty days after the entry of the order, a written petition requesting that the order be modified or set aside in whole or in part.
(2) A copy of the petition shall be transmitted forthwith by the clerk of the court to a member of the Commission or an officer designated by the Commission for that purpose. Thereupon the Commission shall file in the court the record on which the order complained of is entered, as provided in [section 2112 of title 28](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title28-section2112&num=0&edition=prelim) and the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.
(3) On the filing of the petition, the court has jurisdiction, which becomes exclusive on the filing of the record, to affirm or modify and enforce or to set aside the order in whole or in part.
(4) The findings of the Commission as to the facts, if supported by substantial evidence, are conclusive.
(5) If either party applies to the court for leave to adduce additional evidence and shows to the satisfaction of the court that the additional evidence is material and that there was reasonable ground for failure to adduce it before the Commission, the court may remand the case to the Commission for further proceedings, in whatever manner and on whatever conditions the court considers appropria
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 15 U.S.C. § 78y
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Incoming connection: Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 230
TITLE 5—GOVERNMENT ORGANIZATION AND EMPLOYEES
§ 705
vides that the action meanwhile is inoperative,
for an appeal to superior agency authority.
(Pub. L. 89–554, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 392.)
HISTORICAL AND REVISION NOTES
Derivation
U.S. Code
Revised Statutes and
Statutes at Large
..................
5 U.S.C. 1009(c).
June 11, 1946, ch. 324, § 10(c),
60 Stat. 243.
Standard changes are made to conform with the defi-
nitions applicable and the style of this title as outlined
in the preface of this report.
§ 705. Relief pending review
When an agency finds that justice so requires,
it may postpone the effective date of action
taken by it, pending judicial review. On such
conditions as may be required and to the extent
necessary to prevent irreparable injury, the re-
viewing court, including the court to which a
case may be taken on appeal from or on applica-
tion for certiorari or other writ to a reviewing
court, may issue all necessary and appropriate
process to postpone the effective date of an
agency action or to preserve status or rights
pending conclusion of the review proceedings.
(Pub. L. 89–554, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 393.)
HISTORICAL AND REVISION NOTES
Derivation
U.S. Code
Revised Statutes and
Statutes at Large
..................
5 U.S.C. 1009(d).
June 11, 1946, ch. 324, § 10(d),
60 Stat. 243.
Standard changes are made to conform with the defi-
nitions applicable and the style of this title as outlined
in the preface of this report.
§ 706. Scope of review
To the extent necessary to decision and when
presented, the reviewing court shall decide all
relevant questions of law, interpret constitu-
tional and statutory provisions, and determine
the meaning or applicability of the terms of an
agency action. The reviewing court s
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 5 U.S.C. § 705
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.